Foundationalism

[@emale03]

Dr. Bonevac sets the bar for great teaching and understanding!

[@michaelsinclair604]

Thank you for doing these videos. You're allowing people to access university-level knowledge for free.

[@jorgevianademoraes8885]

The more complex philosophical questions seem like child's play in Professor Daniel's explanation. Excellent lecture !!!

[@averagejohnson3985]

He has a great verbal cadence for teaching

[@keylupveintisiete7552]

Thanks a lot! This is a beacon of light in the darkness of our current situation.

[@WebHackmd]

darkness of your situation? I'm doing fine.

[@Terry-nr5qn]

Great for you, I dont know if you have heard, but there is a raging pandemic going on with millions dead

[@robertotandoi4224]

Very well done, Professor ! If I don't get it wrong, the ultimate foundation lies in a form of empirical realism.

[@MSA-uj7cp]

Wow, really high quality explanation and teaching. Thank you.

[@aritraadey1258]

Thanks a lot..

[@modestoarreola]

Thanks for yor videos Don Daniel, i love thems.

[@Metaphist]

I love these videos!

[@robertstevens1287]

An interesting thing is that the outsideness of a justifier can make it monolithic, impregnable, if its outsideness is used as evidence for it's validity, in rhetoric. Furthermore, a fundamental justifier's unknownness blurs all knowledge built upon, because it's impossible to know the veracity of an unknown thing.

[@Renegen1]

really well explained

[@alittax]

12:53 If perception is the basis of knowledge, then would two people with different sense organs create two completely different kinds of math and logic? That just doesn't sound right. Why can't Descartes' clear and distinct perceptions play the role of the ultimate justifiers? Because clear and distinct perceptions themselves are elements of the domain of knowledge (because they are pieces of knowledge), and we need at least one element outside the domain of knowledge?

[@lt4376]

Fundamentals vs Foundationalism?

[@averagejohnson3985]

5:41 Poland 1939 Colorized