Internalism

[@agnosticmonkey7308]

You and Gregory B. Sadler are wonderful teachers, I aspire to be like you guys someday.

[@Junjokar]

This format and camera setup with the board is really great!

[@odinfranklin2656]

instaBlaster.

[@malenchki]

Thank you so much for thisss. I love your videoss so muchh.

[@PhiloofAlexandria]

Glad you like them!

[@Garretts1201]

Thanks goat, you make epistemology understandable

[@ryrez4478]

great explanation. great job and thank you

[@Florianuus]

Beautifully and simplisticaally explained. Thank you very much, subscribed!

[@joelwest5541]

Just found your channel... amazing thank you!

[@Nubia594]

I love your teachings.......

[@otomeauthor]

The cat is a good sidekick 🐈

[@JerryPenna]

I'm partial to the idea of contextualist epistemology. Context matters in so many situations, if not all. I came across the third idea of epistemology called contextualism. I'd appreciate hearing you talk about this lesser know theory of knowledge. M

[@kallianpublico7517]

What then to make of quantum mechanics and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in regards to the observation of "fundamental" particles? What is light?

[@th3ist]

Good content @Daniel Bonevac but you need to turn of your auto focus on the camera and do a manual setup

[@PhiloofAlexandria]

Thanks for the tip. I've noticed that how well it works depends a lot on how far I am from the camera, how much I move, and how much things in the background move.

[@nightfurylove7775]

has anyone found the follow up video for this?

[@qwerpasdf]

This is fascinating! I am not philosopher this is just interesting to me, but I recently read a paper titled "is justified true belief knowledge?" which is claimed (from what I've read about it) to disprove that justified true belief is knowledge. But I don't seem to understand this paper well. Perhaps if you saw this comment and wanted to you could point me in the right direction. Also, this would imply that, although not incorrect in their assumption of "internalism," the internalists would need to find a different idea to substitute the definition of the warrant, right? Sorry if this is convoluted. Great video though.

[@PhiloofAlexandria]

I'm going to be doing a separate video on the Gettier problem-watch for it next week!

[@chad969]

Is it possible to be an internalist and believe in non-inferential justification?

[@ronron9019]

(18:10) Is perception considered only as a mental state? So if your eyes are faulty, the shirt is actually blue, but you are perceiving green; an internalist would still consider you justified for believing the shirt is green?

[@PhiloofAlexandria]

Great question! I think the answer is yes. It wouldn't count as knowledge, because it's not true, but it would be justified.

[@ronron9019]

@@PhiloofAlexandria Thanks for clarifying. Great video!