Fourier's Series - Professor Raymond Flood

[@dybydx31]

Respected Sir, Your research is outstanding and I am amazingly impressed the way you present your lectures. The mathematical humour element inducted by you in your talk is worth mentioning .All lectures of yours are flawlessly presented. I like your pronunciation. Keep enlightening us with your knowledge and wisdom.Thank you.

[@andrewbudiman1310]

romanticism of the analytic...i dig it

[@akashninave5001]

Respectful work proffesor 😇

[@VikasNiranjanBellary]

It is a such a simple idea and such a powerful one.

[@adrianasgari1150]

At around 20:00 doesn't he mean sin(u) and not cos(u)?

[@AleksandarKospenda]

Adrian Asgari The square function is a cosine it is also shifted by a fourth of a period to the right.

[@FlockOfHawks]

The vertical at the left *suggests* it is the y-axis , and the graph then indeed implies a sin , not a cos . There's no real difference between them of course : they are eachother at ±π/2 phase .

[@eccesignumrex4482]

I don't have a Hadron?

[@qcislander]

You have to ask?

[@Eduardo-cr8ri]

nice talk

[@alexboone9114]

Bravo

[@eccesignumrex4482]

I have a Hadron -

[@eccesignumrex4482]

Ah, my Hadron is in some sort of super-state in the comment section, i see.

[@qcislander]

3 years so far, and not lepton, I gather?

[@PierreSoubourou]

that is so typical: the lecture mostly treats Anglo-Saxon scientists, Lord Kelvin, Thompson. Fourier is some guy trying to make a way through French Revolution, happened to make important math that helps solve problems posed by famous British scientists...

[@qcislander]

Not TOO far from the truth, Pierre... but... In my engineering education, there were only three people (four?) whose work in basic ("basic" is a silly misleading word... can I say "fundamental?) math or physics forms the huge contribution they made and mostly didn't know themselves the revolutions of thought caused in result. I say "perhaps four", because Newton and Leibniz both created "the calculus" as we know its fundamentals and its basic notations to pass its ideas along. (and without both we wouldn't have made it workable for many years, perhaps decades, after we got it and stopped the quibble). The histories of Laplace, Fourier, and even Descartes, Mandelbrot, Fermat aren't recognized everywhere for what contributions they made. So what? Every one of them is dead, and much of the world honours their lives and what they made of them. They don't call them "Frenchmen" any more than they call Einstein or Heisenberg "Germans". Wanna be nationalist about whose *science* you're ready to give a "pass" to? I bloody well hope NOT.

[@PierreSoubourou]

typical : a conference on a foreign scientist, but that only speaks (and praises) about Anglo-Saxon scientist. Fourier is a nobody trying to make a way through French Revolution, that build upon Lord Kelvin and Thompson, that made some mathematics useful for problems posed by Great British scientists

[@greywolf271]

what fucking planet are you on idiot ? Did you even understand what was said about Fourier's life ? That the French state almost had him beheaded ?

[@ida.wendigo]

Professor Flood did not do a great job. This was boring. And the sound he makes with his mouth is annoying af. He is just reading about Fourier, I can google myself and read those things. 👎