Frame Assignment For Robotic Manipulators - Direct Kinematics I

[@cerenbirben9096]

Your way of explaining is so effective that I notice details that I never understood before. Thanks a lot for your effort.

[@ooiziyu358]

this is a lot better than my lecturer omg. Thanks, you saved my final exam

[@taherpatrawala3427]

Thank you brother, it was clear as crystal.

[@lekhrajdewangan8491]

You explained in a very simple way than books thank you sir!

[@andriiboryshkevych6124]

God bless you for making this video!

[@Shivshankar-xd3br]

you simplified it in a very good way super cool

[@ibrahimawad-k3k]

such a savior

[@Weminan]

Thanks lot. Your explanation made it make sense

[@AirAdventurer194]

This is priceless; thank you!

[@king_gomer]

Very good explanation. Thanks

[@TatharNuar]

@2:45 Shouldn't this be N+1 links, including the ground link and the open link on the opposite end? Grubler's formula wouldn't work otherwise.

[@humayonnaseer7225]

brother you nailed it thankyou💝

[@Chekuthan0101]

Great explanation

[@brokenEngineerMathAndPhysics]

Very simple explanation. Thank you

[@abdulmanankhalid8994]

Sir make videos on inverse kinematics please

[@sleephourofmotivatwakeupas6512]

The best video s9 far

[@Gotenham]

very well explained thank you!

[@Talha80777]

good explanation

[@NYXSriLanka]

Thank you soo much❤🎉 very clear and helpful

[@p09notankumar42]

good bro , that is engineering

[@HariRA-jn5wd]

if two lines are intersecting it is obvious the lie in same plane so there's no 2 planes ....its only one and you take the normal to that plane.

[@Power_DC_Official]

Yes, simplicity is the key for newcomers.

[@NilofarSaleem-u6k]

Point 5. why are you applying left hand rule, while its written right hand rule should be applied. ?

[@RESC_Eng]

Why did you use LHR not RHR for frame {0} , does it make sense ?

[@Saisankeerth760]

Its easier for us to imagine

[@seasnek7024]

@@Saisankeerth760 that's only for magnetism along a wire

[@iamyouu]

how did you choose frame of the tool? and how to incorporate spherical joints?

[@TR7H]

I'm sorry but assigning the x-axes with the planes make no sense to me.. How can you ever have an unambiguous plane if you'r only requirement is that the z axel is contained in it? And more over, even if that is solved by requiring the two planes of adjacent axes to be on the same plane, the normal still has two possible directions. Am I missing something?

[@Andrew-kg2es]

Came to the comments for this!

[@dhruvshah8762]

I viewed this page to understand what is going on: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-hand_rule. I hope this helps

[@Thilina_sanjaya]

Thanks👍

[@cook9256]

The 5th step is the right-hand rule but the picture is for LHR?

[@thatsengineering5235]

The 5th step is to assign the Y axis. As the X and Z axes are already known the Y axis is assigned mutually perpendicular to them. The rule used is Flemings left hand rule and the picture shows that. Practically, three mutually perpendicular directions. Hope that clarified any doubts.

[@Power_DC_Official]

@@thatsengineering5235 It does not clarify doubts. Your explanation in steps 5 and 6 is super confusing. Up until that point you are talking about RHR and suddenly you use LHR and also mention you can shuffle axes around with no explanation whatsoever. "As the X and Z axes are already known the Y axis is assigned mutually perpendicular to them." - this can be applied with both RHR and LHR, the latter pointing Y-axis in negative direction. Step 5 clearly states "satisfy RHR" yet frame {0} satisfies LHR. Again, super confusing.

[@ct96]

@@Power_DC_Official You should use the RHR for coordinate frames, Flemings' left hand rule is to do with current and force in a wire nothing to do with coordinate frames. The directions of the axes come from the vector cross products i x j = k, j x k = i, k x i = j where i,j and k are unit vectors in the x,y and z directions.

[@seasnek7024]

@@thatsengineering5235 Flemming's Left Hand Rule is to do with the force along a current-carrying wire when subjected to a magnetic field...this is not correct!

[@seasnek7024]

2:45 Should be n+1 links 13:24 You shouldn't be using the Left Hand Rule. That is for Flemming's Rule when doing magnetism and force vectors along a current-carrying wire.

[@arafatasghar372]

Isn't Right Hand Rule followed for assigning the y-axis?

[@opiritetariah]

Thank you

[@Groveish]

Don't screw joints also have one DOF?

[@abdulrehmanraja9311]

have you explained inverse kinematics? I have exam in 36 hours and I need to understand that too...

[@zainashraf6474]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGrOqZugaseFbNk hope it helps

[@pvmilk]

left-hand rule?

[@adimalik7028]

Aren't the links n+1?

[@anupks3303]

Y-axis assigned based on the right-hand rule, not the left-hand rule. Please don't mislead viewers

[@thatsengineering5235]

As per the convention used, the Z-axis is assigned based on the RHR. This may differ based on a different convention.

[@sweg5989]

@@thatsengineering5235 in the video: "5. Assign the Yi axis to complete a right hand coordinate system." But then you use left hand rules?

[@coral-m]

thsnks

[@abdulmanankhalid8994]

Manipulator Dinamics

[@vimalbolozubankesri8996]

n joints means n+1 links correct that ig thats mistake

[@Alireza-kw6fj]

I really didn't understand how to find x axis

[@mshirazbaig6055]

I wonder why do you use left hand rule. When everyone else use right hand rule. The best videos are those of angla sodeman. I wonder why every one tries to invent the wheel his own way.

[@Power_DC_Official]

Great course with a really bad example. The robot in example should also have perpendicular axis of movement not only parallel axes.

[@LearningOdysse]

your videos 🥵