Denavit - Hartenberg (DH) Tables For Robotic Systems - Direct Kinematics II

[@rickykuek7128]

So nice , this 2 hours playlist completes my University whole semester's lecture, with even more, clear explanation compare to my lecturer, so like it when I find it in my revision week

[@snehashishbanerjee2575]

Any clearn and lovely explanation, other than this is impossible! Can't appreciate enough :) EXCELLENT lecture!

[@viktor7879]

Wow man such an excellent lecture! So simple yet so effective!

[@BassemAlaaEdineAhmed]

That’s a lot of effort really! It is sad that it does not hit the number of views it deserves. I wish you luck and I hope you don’t get discouraged 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼

[@thatsengineering5235]

Thank you very much

[@ashutoshsharma2129]

Thanks a lot I have my exam tomorrow and this will surely help

[@dimension01]

Thanks very much, underrated channel

[@mugunthan2357]

Precise and neat explanation ❤️ thanks

[@dr.vikassisodia7960]

bro your videos on basic of robotics are awesome.... please keep making videos....

[@CyrusGates]

Great explanation clear and concise

[@arindajohnson8306]

Very effective. Im sure going to ace my Robotics course this semester

[@Mohammed-rq5og]

Amazing video, well explained !!

[@ashutoshnirala2565]

V v useful. Thankyou for going through an example.

[@tonystark2408]

Was very well explaned.

[@javadhatami9106]

very good explanation. thanks!

[@072janaa3]

Clear cut explanation thank you ✨✨✨

[@ayushfake]

U r genius thanks for such a lovely video

[@런하-o7l]

It helped me a lot in my assignment. Thank you very much!!!!!!!!❤️

[@thatsengineering5235]

Glad it helped, all the best

[@jasperwong9083]

Clear explanation...thank you

[@sravanthikunchapu9390]

Excellent explanation keep going sir...

[@ahqrfgaming]

Excellent work bro.🖤🖤🔥

[@srihari1672]

Nice explanation 👌👌

[@vishnurajiv99]

Very well and easily explained. Thank you very much, your video has helped me with my exam preparation. I have a small question though. At 10:06 in the box, you have mentioned d(i) and theta(i) to be with respect to z(i). Shouldn't it be z(i-1)?

[@NYXSriLanka]

Thank you sooo much🎉

[@kedardarasamerh8678]

Thank you very much!!!

[@yaced14]

Would be great, if you create a video with a more complex robot (including intersections).

[@snehashishbanerjee2575]

And, now how can I convert the table into transformation matrices? Could you plz suggest any material sir?

[@jaswanths1193]

i have one example problem, will you be able to solve and post answers for it?

[@Doakley_42]

now what wuldve you have done if d1 want included in the drawing? would di for axis 1 just be 0?

[@SavedbyHim]

I looked at this so many times now and I find the (i) variable confusing. For the first line: The definition for a(i-1) is Distance from Z(i) to Z(i+1) measured along the X axis. This would make Z(i) =1 and Z(i+1) = Z2 because i=1. Yet we are looking at the Z0 and Z1 axis? Why do we not describe the Y-axis at all?

[@miaz20]

because there is no variable in y-axis

[@AB-pi8tv]

Thank You brooo

[@shamssalehin2376]

hello mate...keep it up.

[@splitscreenstatus6811]

make one full video on DH table and transformation where value of ai-1 somethings like a1,a2 and value of di is like d1,d2 and angle alpha consists of -90 degree or +90 degree

[@angel25003]

hola profe, queria preguntarle como se acomodaria la tabla DH si hubiera una articulacion rotacional auxiliar, en otras palabras simples uniones donde no va un actuador, estan ahi solo para apoyar en el movimiento, un ejemplo seria el robot que escribe la hora, saludos

[@magdgamil8892]

u r the best

[@lihanilhan7413]

teta i for the last should be 90+teta 3. Proffesor is it correct?

[@durgadasreji3678]

good job🥰🥰

[@Ahmad-ht6pt]

Mannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn, you just saved me from getting an F tommorrow. kabskbjdjkadkkjadfnadfj

[@pchanio]

Why on EARTH would one use the SAME SYMBOL for link length and link twist? (Latin a and Greek α alpha)

[@Albatros17859]

Ελα ντε και εμένα με μπερδευε στην αρχή.

[@connorhennig4777]

calm down brother

[@MexicanRoboticsEngineer]

I love you

[@procodecamp2044]

Finalize the example you have started

[@williamhuang5329]

Hanzhen harmonic drive gear , robot gear joint, over 30 years experience

[@demonheart6627]

「コンテンツを調整する必要があります」、

[@georgiamachado7764]

CovidImages need to be invested more than half19

[@erikbeier9515]

This video is simply wrong in many areas... revolute => di = 0 ? this is false. prismatic => theta i = 0 ? this is also false. Also, is there no effort to discuss axis labelling? this is literally half of what DH is about... there is no way to obtain the parameters properly without first correctly labelling the diagram. Nice try, but overly simplified. For example, z0 cannot be arbitrarily chosen like it is here. It must point in the direction of joint 1...

[@Power_DC_Official]

Looks I am not the only one to spot errors in this video.

[@adventuresofriaz87]

the labellings were done in his previous video. As for the di and theta i, I don't know if they are correct, I myself am attempting to understand this topic

[@connorhennig4777]

Direct Kinematics II, II means part 2, there was a part 1 describing how to label axes. Also, z0 is pointing directly to joint 1. Try to pay a bit more attention before tearing someones video down. Why dont you explain to us why those first two things are false?

[@dhruvshah8762]

We are all here to learn... what are the corrections that you suggest and please share any additional resources.

[@RuwanthaPushpika]

thank you very much !!!