Francesca Gino Claims Innocence

[@Danny.Hatcher]

Thank you for watching. Comments are welcomed and encouraged - what do you think? I heart comments I have seen, and reply to those KZbin notifies me off. FEEDBACK: 2:42 Should say "seventy" 3:21 Table from Appendix 2 from source 6 KEY COMMENTS: US system is innocent until proven guilty so Francesca isn't claiming innocence because that assumes she is guilty - @PinoyMN

[@davidjulitz7446]

What really concerns me is, that it is possible to write a research paper and successfully publishing it in a high impact journal, with such a messy excel sheet as a basis. Looks to me that such "high impact" researchers are even not able to use excel correctly?

[@controlledsingularity8084]

Trust the science! Meanwhile the science:

[@davidp.7620]

Resesrch quality control isn't about method, it's about contacts and references

[@AvgJane19]

No literally because WHERE ARE THE STANDARDS

[@drumstep9135]

Basic excel competency is frequently shockingly lacking in places where it's really needed in government and industry as well. And really a lot of those use cases should be using a different tool, but that requires someone to actually know what's available/possible and make the effort to get competent useful training for their employees through the bureaucratic hell.

[@JP-wx6uh]

Exactly

[@JP-wx6uh]

SHE'S VERY CLEARLY NOT INNOCENT. AND NOW IT HAS BEEN FOUND THAT SHE COMMITTED PLAGIARISM FROM A PAPER SHE PUBLISHED IN 2016.

[@Danny.Hatcher]

Yes, I am keeping my eye on the developments 👀

[@arofhoof]

Well if you are responsible for the integrity of the data it doesnt matter if you did the fraud or not… you are responsible for it. Welcome to accountability.

[@Danny.Hatcher]

Agreed.

[@edwardjones856]

You did misunberstand how the data was sorted

[@EvilWeiRamirez]

This story makes me so sad. I'm a private chef, and this woman was working on creativity. I actually have a lot of experience giving people tools to think creatively. I actually reached out to her to work with her. My sister did her post doc at Harvard, so it was easy to get in touch with her. And then this happened ... And so ... Yeah ... Not gonna happen anymore.

[@AL_1991]

lmao sure

[@shoshanakirya-ziraba8216]

How is such crappy data a part of a prestigious project? 😅 Here I was thinking that I'm not Ivy League material!

Not with that attitude.

[@AceOnBase1]

There’s a bunch of new evidence, and it came to light that there is plagiarism in her books.

[@Danny.Hatcher]

I have seen the discussions 👀

[@ParDiss-e4i]

It was the same indian guy.

[@PinoyMN]

In the U.S. judicial system, one is "presumed" innocent until proven otherwise. Your framing of a "claim" to innocence is a common unintended fallacy, typical of those unfamiliar with the system. This is a crucial distinction to grasp, not just mere wordplay, since the idea of one's need to claim innocence implies that we operate in a world where guilt is presumed, unless proved otherwise. While that is often a harsh reality of a punitive mindset (that manifests in law), as an ethical and legal framework it deserves fierce opposition if we envision a just society.

[@Danny.Hatcher]

Great point! Thank you.

[@vicenteignaciodiaz7012]

The video in itself is very good, but I feel like the caricature from the thumbnail has too many polygons, to the point it looks like Francesca Gino was made of wrinkles xD. I don't know if you can tune down that, because some other of your thumbnails have the same problem, and that makes it so the faces don't really look like the people they are portraying. Greetings from Chile!

[@stanleyklein524]

The other three questionable papers. Full stop.