Frank Turek - Session 2 - Does God Exist? (Part 1)

[@silviyapancheva]

Absolutely brilliant! I’m so upset I didn’t know about this event two years ago.

[@kennethgee2004]

so now that you have had this information for three years now, how has it impacted your life and/or behavior?

[@binoyandpinay777]

The Lord has given Frank so much knowledge and wisdom in this area. Thoroughly enjoying and noting this. Thank you Jesus, you got every possible subject we can imagine/ think of Covered.

[@Cloud03-]

I don't know how true he is, but he is one of the greatest speaker of all time

[@Peekaboo-Kitty]

How do you know he's the "greatest speaking of ALL time" if you don't know if he's correct or not?

[@IBenZik]

Amen! Lord the heavens sing your praise!

[@Resenbrink]

yeah he already knows

[@rvgaming1860]

The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament showeth his handiwork

[@hensonpedroleon7787]

Indeed!

[@neoplasma1]

Yet he still talks about stars billions of light years away and gravity haha. That’s how strong The indoctrination is in grained in even the strongest minds.

[@virtuosyc]

@@neoplasma1 True, he really seems believe that but to be fair he would lose the ears of non-believers immediatly and if they continue searching they will see that the globe can't be it. In the end it doesn't really matter what you believe about the shape of the earth, it's more important to find Jesus.

[@chadrasmussen6127]

Amen

[@royglenn2487]

Blah blah blah

[@bakari60]

my favourite apologetic

[@johnyfragopski7468]

This person is a genius

[@christianmarcusdills1224]

Yes he is. I’ve learned a lot from him. He’s definitely been an inspiration to get me started on researching and studying the Bible a lot more. He’s awesome! Very funny and makes things very easy to understand

[@IIrandhandleII]

Lol

[@donnyh3497]

Frank is a conman who knows that half of his words are either lies or intentional misrepresentation of current science

[@brianmabasa5251]

​@@IIrandhandleII Whats so funny?

[@IIrandhandleII]

@@brianmabasa5251 frank turek a genius lol yes very funny.

[@hwd71]

45:00. Never thought I'd write that Stephen Colbert is a genius for out smarting Lawrence Krauss.

[@courtneywanma7809]

Exceptional ❤️🙏🏽

[@Andy-lu6sx]

Short answer: duh

[@hensonpedroleon7787]

Yep!

[@happilysecular2323]

In the absence of facts and logic, just make a pathetic attempt to pretend that it’s obvious.

[@stutteringdisciple1919]

If you can’t watch the hour long video I’ll save you the time. The answer is yes.

[@therick363]

Is that a yes in your opinion and beliefs or a yes fact of reality?

[@BlacksmithTWD]

@@therick363 Unless you happen to believe this OP is Frank Turek, he is obviously merely conveying the conclusion Frank draws in the video, though he probably agrees with this conclusion. So in that sense it's a fact of reality, you can watch the full video to make sure this is actually the conclusion Frank derrives at in this video.

[@therick363]

@@BlacksmithTWD but Frank doesn’t prove a god

[@BlacksmithTWD]

@@therick363 Of course not, so far I've only observed proof within the realm of mathematics. Sciences on the other hand require evidence rather than proof to determine and compare probabilities. General philosophy has even less restrictions on reason. This happens to be a topic of the last category as theology is another branch of philosophy than science is.

[@xandrix]

Glory to the Almighty God. Nothing can describe how awesome You are!

[@daniel7316]

Evolution

[@JolinHard]

Amazing! Praise the Lord.

[@David34981]

Why does that guy need so much praise? Is he compensating for something?

[@JolinHard]

@@David34981 Thats a good question. I guess my best answer would be that God doesnt need our praise and us humans give him praise because we like to appreciate him

[@GodSoLoved.Yeshua]

Absolutely God is amazing, he deserves all our praise. 🥳👏👑✝️

[@petesmits6335]

Thank you so much Frank, I know it's all true and you do a great job of reminding and explaining to us why, God bless you!

[@jeffandsherriefranzwa8970]

Krauss gave himself away when he referred to "supernatural shenanigans".

[@davidvandewater1402]

That was the Word of God! Woosh and there was no answer possible any more. The theory was vaporated in milliseconds. Beautiful!

[@buck_maize111]

I didn't know isis crucify children.. I had to look it up. 😭😭😨 My heart is shattered to pieces!

[@moonchild1758]

@Beren c Isis is pure evil; they must be destroyed!

[@daniel1fullerton]

All religion is pure evil

[@2fast2block]

@@daniel1fullerton, well look who's here, the dumbass who can only do word farts and never back up what you say with evidence. Hey, I'm still waiting for you admitting you are wrong twice, and for your apology. Remember? Sure you do. You LOVE being a dumbass. ---------------------------------------------- 2fast2block 3 hours ago @Daniel Fuller "This is probably the dumbest comment I've ever read." Then you didn't read your own comment. "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5 ---------------------------------------- 2fast2block 1 hour ago @Daniel Fuller "As expected, you have no idea. Time and space are dimensions." Tim said in his first comment, "Yes space time and matter were created simultaneously, because if you had matter and time but no space where would you put it? If you had matter and space but no time when would you put it?" You said, "This is probably the dumbest comment I've ever read." Now, to the topic I proved you wrong. You don't like that so you cry like a spoiled baby, "As expected, you have no idea. Time and space are dimensions." You did NEVER dispute the physics that you cannot have one without the other and I showed that and you IGNORE that. In your dumbass mind you think everyone is a dumbass like you and think it was not noticed how you ignored the clear evidence against you. Now, you're latest crap, "As expected, you have no idea. Time and space are dimensions." Dimensions how? What dumbass claims dimensions just being there with no explanation of how could there be dimensions? Oh, a dumbass like you. Hold on, there's more stupid word farting from this freak dumbass, "Very simple. I have no idea what you are going on about "god of nothing" You proved yourself about a dumbass on what Tim said and how you responded by me showing you the physics of what Tim said. Now, you do NOT understand even BASIC physics. So I'll have to teach your dumb ass again. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. Now, try to stay with the topic as you tell me "You need to be put on medication.", and give me your science to counter mine. Tell me how dimensions are just there. Give the physics for it that show me wrong. And don't forget, it will be "Very simple" simple for you. Come on, dumbass, give me a laugh. And dumbass, face reality, your god IS the god of nothing. So shove that up your ass and see if it reaches your head way up there too.

[@royglenn2487]

Yes isis is one fucked up religion, much like all the others, if you don’t believe me read up on a thing called history.

[@themexicanwhostoleyourjob2678]

@@royglenn2487 Guess who else didn't like religion and religious people? Jesus Christ. God and religion are 2 different things, but us humans will find a way to corrupt everything and use it for evil means.

[@trommelbiel]

God, please cause me to be humble.

[@richardwilliams473]

Frank Turek can speculate all he wants but the fact of the matter is that all of the questions of God and Life itself will be answered when we die.

[@David34981]

Not necessarily. If you die and there is no afterlife, no questions are really answered. No one's the wiser. The dead person doesn't know anything, because they're dead. The survivors don't know anything either.

[@danmahalo]

Awesome!!

[@Kolevrott]

How can they can calculate de "expantion" if the dimensions are so hard to calculate for the same expantion reason?

[@kristofftaylovoski60]

54:45 Flunking Science does not make you a bad Christian, just an incompetent one. Salvation is Pass/Fail, not graded on a curve. And that is the most re-assuring observation I can proffer today.

[@walterobermuller4017]

Brilliant indeed, I absolutely like it, but consider what the Apostle Paul said in 1 Corinthians 2 ... I did not come with eloquence or superior wisdom... My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirits power, so that your faith might not rest on men´s wisdom, but on God´s power.

[@paratrond]

Wow! ❤👍🌹

[@Grey-Elder]

This dude is so tense!

[@inspiredme7030]

That Lawrence part is fun tho

[@navodmudannayaka3345]

Very Interesting Video..😊

[@pauls.6360]

Stay tuned for Session 3: Does God exist in your pastor's soiled diaper, or is that only an overloaded collection plate? (Part 99)

[@hwd71]

I have always had a negative gut reaction to the concept of “consensus science.” But Michael Crichton explains it best when he said: I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. And he continues: Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What are relevant are reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period.

[@ronaldlindeman6136]

This is so not true. Michael Crichton is not someone to take Science advice from. Okay, he is smart, getting both a Medical degree and a Law degree if I remember right. And he wrote all those books. But let us say that someone says that the Earth revolves around the Sun. Is that consensus? How about Physics, Force = Mass x Acceleration. Or any of the other consensus laws that Physics has come up with. Michael Crichton wrote stupid stuff in that Global Warming book. Just nuts. He did die from cancer sometime after that. Maybe he could explain himself better. But I have read from Scientists who just did not understand what he was getting at, he sure did sound like some crackpot, not good thinking at all.

[@user-hw8ct4ly1u]

I wish he would slow down his lectures. I can hardly comprehend his teachings.

[@dalesemurath7841]

The slide as I can see it is showing the second planet.

[@youtubeaccount5153]

Excellent. One small detail. In that picture, those weren’t all stars. Probably most were not stars. Those were galaxies. Each full of billions of not trillions of stars.

[@sly33]

God-Level Creation and Design 🙌🙏‼️ String Theory provides evidence that the very essence of everything is vibrational strings AKA strings of sound energy proving that it ALL came from the Voice of God ‼️🙏🙌 God's Voice is the very Catalyst that brought everything into existence ‼️🙏🙌

[@jacquelineharris6124]

If god exists outside of space and time than how could he do anything if time is required to preform an action?

[@sly33]

@@jacquelineharris6124 God created space and time AND He can come into space and time to interact with His Creation, there's nothing stopping Him from doing that. If God couldn't enter into space and time then He would not be God.

[@jacquelineharris6124]

@@sly33 i don't think you understand my question.

[@jacquelineharris6124]

@@sly33 can an action take place without time?

[@sly33]

@@jacquelineharris6124 Yes, an action can take place inside or outside of time. God is not restricted by time, either in or out, and can take action regardless.

[@jonathanturek5846]

Yesssss ! Music to my doct in arch bach o sci engineer bach business admin AA in art Mind

[@thirdmonkeyent]

I don't like when we say there was nothing before the universe. Because there wasn't even an existence for nothing to be a thing in. So it's actually less than nothing. It's an incomprehensible nothing.

[@thirdmonkeyent]

@@unlimitedlyintelligentspirit yeah. I know. I want arguing against God. But in our realm the was non-existence. Good is a spiritual being. He created space, time, and matter.

[@elohimelyonistruth6551]

Magical is the only word that can attempt to explain.

[@yazminalvarez432]

And magic doesn't exist

[@derekardito2032]

And is magic real?, The answer is NO.

[@kielhawkins9529]

Kraus talking about empty space weighing something. This would indicate then that it isn't truly empty. However, prior to the big bang, you would necessarily have true emptiness as matter space and time did not exist at all. So what he observes now as "empty space" would necessarily not be the same thing as "empty space" prior to the big bang. Thats like highschool level logic.

[@guillermocanamo9363]

SOMEDAY ALL THE PEOPLE WHO DID NOT BELIEVE IN GOD THEY’RE CRYING WHEN THE TRIBULATIONS AND DISASTERS COME HORRENDOUSLY

[@adespoja]

But until then - you will be food for worms just like everyone else. Get over it.

[@daniel1fullerton]

This is why christianity needs to go.

[@ThyNam3less]

@@daniel1fullerton lol that wont change anything. 🤣

[@daniel1fullerton]

@@ThyNam3less that would eliminate the nonsensical hysteria inducing lies created by christians

[@nickcalma222]

@@daniel1fullerton lol its more reasonable than atheism.

[@Kolevrott]

Look for the creator within you because he lives in all of his sons and daughters. That is why is the temple of The Spirit.

[@joachim595]

the woman at 6:35 doesn't look very happy about what Turek's saying

[@francischewe3196]

Great stuff!!!

[@shanieloemraw2990]

In the beginning huh. An old book knows the truth(torah)

[@ani.astro444]

Revelation 1:8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega,” says the Lord God, “who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.”

[@royglenn2487]

You are preaching to the Choir, Try talking to someone who cant sing. I mean have a session with a crowd that has questions, You have an arena filled with believers, even I could go on stage with a crew like that and get applause.

[@MrCaribKaraoke]

He does this on many college campuses...like hundreds

[@garretts431]

i thought colbert was being facetious and not to be taken seriously in this video?

[@manacondamuffmangler4232]

Those can be arguments for panthiesm

[@kristofftaylovoski60]

yeah, nobody is not going to admit that..

[@sethharvill4624]

In a way, if God can be anywhere at anytime, bring omniscient then he is the God of the universe, just not the actual universe. Colossians 1:16

[@nickcalma222]

sure but pantheistic religions don't have evidence that line up with their book or something while the monotheistic religions like the bible and jesus is true and there is evidence behind that.

[@jameswells9749]

The guy on the Colbert show? I can see God falling off his throne laughing on the floor.

[@berenc7619]

God makes.foolish those who think they are wise , gotta love it 😁😎

[@commandericeman8588]

I rewound it three times and I still didn't get the joke.

[@ImJordanHubbard-qg9qt]

22:10 is not true. I am a Christian but Einstein didn't divide by zero. Einstein introduced the cosmological constant (Λ) into his field equations of general relativity to allow for a static universe, as he believed in an eternal and unchanging cosmos at the time.

[@flixpix9984]

wow Stephen Cobert owned that physicist

[@shivam9633]

Duniya me koi shashwat satya nahi hai, Satya kewal ashtayi cheez hoti hai Jo samay aane pe hi apne rup me sahi saabit hoti hai, usi rakar bhagwan bhi sabko nahi mil sakta. Wo bhi kewal ek asthai hai aur anukul samay aane pe hi mil pata hai, na hi ved shashwat hai aur na hi samay chakra!

[@atulofau9006]

45:19 Colbert has debunked all of his theory. Hahaha he laughed, but he did not realize that Colbert was schooling him about logic

[@StandForTruth205]

Yes space time and matter were created simultaneously, because if you had matter and time but no space where would you put it? If you had matter and space but no time when would you put it?

[@daniel1fullerton]

This is probably the dumbest comment I've ever read.

[@2fast2block]

@@daniel1fullerton "This is probably the dumbest comment I've ever read." Then you didn't read your own comment. "A vacuum, to us, is a space with no matter in it. As a practical matter though, it's really a space with very little matter in it. You might already know that it's REALLY hard to get all the matter out of any space" from: education.jlab.org/qa/vacuum_02.html "Relativistic-quantum-field-theoretical vacuum states - no less than giraffes or refrigerators or solar systems - are particular arrangements of elementary physical stuff."- from: www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/books/review/a-universe-from-nothing-by-lawrence-m-krauss.html?_r=0 "That makes Matter = Energy; Energy = Space; Space = Time. Therefore matter, energy, space and time are all interchangeable characteristics, which implies strongly that they are all forms of one thing." from: medium.com/@alasdairf/are-matter-energy-time-space-all-interchangeable-e2dbf7d411e5

[@daniel1fullerton]

@@2fast2block tell me what is space and what is time?

[@2fast2block]

@@daniel1fullerton "tell me what is space and what is time?" Space is what you take up for no reason. You are nothing from your god of nothing. You just take up space. Time is what is wasted on you. You're a nothing from your god of nothing. Nothing gets through to you. All that matters to a nothing of you is that you worship your god of nothing. I proved you wrong. Since you have no substance and are a nothing from your god of nothing, you don't counter with science from something, you offer nothing. You live for nothing. A total waste. It's what YOU want. The atheist/agnostic god. I HATE your god. the god of nothing. Your god claims to have given us the universe, fine-tuning of the universe for life, life from non-life, information for life before and after it began, the laws of nature, etc, etc, when we know that your god of nothing can do nothing. Your god of nothing has nothing to offer and its followers only offer nothing of evidence for their god of nothing. That makes them nothing of importance but the followers of the god of nothing are so delusional that they think they do have something to offer to defend their god of nothing.

[@daniel1fullerton]

@@2fast2block As expected, you have no idea. Time and space are dimensions. 4 dimensions. Very simple. I have no idea what you are going on about "god of nothing" lmao. You need to be put on medication.

[@michelangelope830]

I was religious and atheist and I claim I have discovered the nature of God, and atheists have explained to me what is atheism, because I don't know yet, almost infinite times. Which means atheists have defended an idea without any arguments deceiving their innocent and vulnerable children always. I am a poet that writes prose to be understood better, all my work is poetry. Humanity are living a lie for obvious reasons for anyone interested in the truth. Would you understand and tell your innocent and vulnerable children what I said to you? Why? They would understand an injustice is being committed. The greatest knowledge of all time is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist.

[@jacquelineharris6124]

If god exists outside of space and time than how could he do anything if time is required for an action to take place? He would be eternally locked in stasis. I've been asking this question for a year now and have yet to get a coherent answer....

[@roddycavin4600]

Strange because I've read scientists describe nature as such.' Exists outside of the universe. Can influence but cannot be influenced by the universe.'

[@roddycavin4600]

@@unlimitedlyintelligentspirit I didn't say' he cannot be influenced ' I said that's how science describes nature as it cannot be influenced. God can do what he wishes.

[@ashwilliams5843]

14:38 ... I would wonder why it would have to be red and blue . . . why not any other color ? .... also ... why would blue mean approaching and red receding ? .... I remember seeing pictures of things taken in outer space and they were in color and somebody said they added that color ... now . . . I am not sure what this means about color in space ...... but today scientist believe or promote ideas that are crazy so it is hard to trust them ... they can be bought , intimidated and or otherwise motivated to lie or be silent about the truth .

[@jirelbyu]

The red/blue shifts has to do with the doppler effect caused by the change in light's wavelength from the stars we observe in the sky. Light from the stars moving away have a longer wavelength, and based of the spectrum of visible light, red is the color that has the largest wavelength of light. Blue has the shortest wavelength, that is why if stars are coming toward us, the light we receive from them have shorter wavelengths :D. Also yeah it is true that a lot of imagery of outerspace has been color-added for illustrative purposes. Because the actual telescopic photographs were taken by infrared if I'm not wrong (for some). The adding of color in that sense is just to help us imagine what they look really like. We cannot know for sure sometimes, but that is besides the point anyway. It's for illustration hehe. As for the red/blue shifts when observed directly by telescope, that is not meant for illustration, but what is actually observed and that is is showing us that the doppler effect is in effect.

[@allysondoerfler8688]

I had no idea that Colbert could actually be funny,

[@A___T785]

its non-sense if you do not understand...

[@kristofftaylovoski60]

The graphic @1:57 with your Three Frank Turek Curated World View's and 31:05 Past/Future Frank Turek Timelines are utter bullshit, and I personally apologize for it.

[@maxspringer01]

can you explain what's BS about the timeline at 31:05?

[@kristofftaylovoski60]

@@maxspringer01 Let us let the Good Doctor answer the question.....1,2,3....go!!!!

[@zeddicuszorrander3599]

On 27:30. Frank Turek says, "Whatever created space, time, and matter can't be made of space, time, and matter." Well, (1) if they are creations, then the creator wouldn't be made of them, otherwise they would not be creations, by definition. But ignoring that, by him making this claim, that would leave us to infer he had some insight into how to create these things, which he obviously does not. So, it's a pretty meaningless thing to claim. I can't both tell you how to start a fire and not have knowledge to start a fire, with the exception I accidentally get the answer right, of course, but you understand my point. You can't propose a answer you don't have. Yet Frank Turek pretends he can. You can't tell me, in any reliable sense that fork lifts can't pick up objects if you don't know how fork lifts work.

[@gage2787]

Yeah, but God created all this from nothing. he created the rules, he didn't need a rulebook

[@2fast2block]

"But ignoring that, by him making this claim, that would leave us to infer he had some insight into how to create these things, which he obviously does not." He's not ignoring but claiming it had to be superantural. You may want to try thinking for a change. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

[@matthewfontes3331]

Jesus is the way and the truth and the life. It's all and only about Jesus

[@nickcalma222]

amen

[@KingLoDaTruth]

46:15

[@ACuriousChild]

Mr Hubble deduced based on the phenomenon of redshift that "galaxies" - according to this THEORY, which cannot be RELIABLY extrapolated beyond the setting it is based upon (lab) - are moving away. Which - THE THEORY OF REDSHIFT applied to "galaxies" (themselves only theories) - is not PROVABLE at all. The "redshift theory" has to remain a working theory within SPACE AND TIME. As by existing in space and time one cannot leave it, because as soon as one leaves space and time one cannot prove it within space and time anymore. YAHWEH has created SPACE AND TIME out of HIMSELF, through HIMSELF and for HIS OWN PURPOSES! SOLI DEO GLORIA!

[@mariorudnicki7527]

Turek ar u croatian descent

[@dreamlanddon]

Atheistic Genesis, Chapter 1, verse 1: In the beginning there was nothing, and, the nothing created everything out of nothing. Lo and behold, because it makes no sense at all.. ha ha ha ha ha ha

[@valentinogal781]

2. 1 Corinthians 3:19-20 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God, since it is written: He catches the wise in their craftiness; and again, The Lord knows that the reasonings of the wise are meaningless. 6. Psalm 10:4-7 With haughty arrogance, the wicked “God will not seek justice. He always presumes “There is no God. Their ways always seem prosperous. Your judgments are on high, far away from them. They scoff at all their enemies. They say to themselves, We will not be moved throughout all time, and we will not experience adversity.” Their mouth is full of curses, lies, and oppression, their tongues spread trouble and iniquity. How can an Atheist debate? For anyone to debate on a subject they first have to believe there is a subject (God) to debate on the matter. If this is the case then Atheists do believes there's a God, why else would they debate against the matter with so much passion?

[@karz12]

I don't know how any of these exist or developed.......therefore god. Beautiful. Way to use your intelligence.

[@youtubeaccount5153]

If that is what you got out of this then that is what you came in to it with.

[@randallhatcher6028]

Yes God exists.

[@kristofftaylovoski60]

37:04 why did my 2003 Chevy Impala with the slippy transmission pretty much pop out of existence?? (a strong example of an untuned universe if I ever seen one) C'mon Frank... I thought you said we all won the sperm race.

[@Kolevrott]

I cannot rely on science exclusively unfortunately. 😢

[@jacquelineharris6124]

You can't rely on doctors then. Have fun with that

[@jacquelineharris6124]

@@Kolevrott so you have never or will never seek medical attention?

[@Kolevrott]

​@@jacquelineharris6124exclusively i meant. I would ask a medical opinion for sure. Yahweh also delivers through out Doctors. Not all of them and not all of the time neither but he manifests in everything. The problem is to think that they have the final Word. Or give medical science or any type of science the position of "God". There are good scientists and there are also liars as in every field of a Study as well. The problem is to believe there is no creator and give that position to a simple human.

[@jacquelineharris6124]

@@Kolevrott science is just a methodology which can be tested and continues to produce effective results and predictions. No one is claiming 100% certainty. Thats another benefit of the method is that it can change and evolve when we learn more about our environment. Would you rather live here and now with all the products from scientific discoveries or in the dark ages before scientific inquiry?

[@Kolevrott]

@@jacquelineharris6124 from where do you think that the idea of improving as humans in knowledge come from. What incentivated us to search for more? Science tries ro explain what the creator made for us. That is why even using the science method in a qualitative or quantitative manner you could arrive to the conclusión that there is more likely to be an inmense force that created everything and maintains it in the needed order for everything to sustain its existence. When i say i cannot rely on science only ..I mean that it is innacurate and that situation could lead to a bad understanding even though you could fix it and make it a real truth afterwards. The problem I see here is that you want me to think science comes first and i am telling you the opposite. Both are correct but one created the posibility for the other to exist.

[@ashwilliams5843]

44:52 ???? you do know there were people called scribes . . . they wrote stuff . . . which also means there were people to read it . . . also there were writing systems older than Rome . . . . please sir do read a book . . . in fact read the only book that matters the bible .

[@oldmanjoe6808]

Quite simply... If there is no Almighty God in heaven, there would be no atheists. The atheists spew from their mouths name-calling as they bring judgment against the Living God, all the while they claim no Living God exists. Their psychosis runs deep... who in their right mind curses what they claim does not exist? By so doing, they evidence the existence of the Living God. Psa. 76:10a "For the wrath of man shall praise Thee."

[@damienschwass9354]

Commenting on a fictional character in a book isn’t cursing or acknowledging its existence.

[@hanshol5399]

nope

[@danielbones9090]

But where did God come from?

[@2fast2block]

It's a silly question that comes from empty people like you who refuse to think. So in your way of shallow thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If you want to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.

[@emilemil7826]

This is the most stupid question

[@rhpicayune]

How could an uncreated Creator be created? Is that what you’re asking?

[@emilemil7826]

@@rhpicayune god is first cause uncaused

[@therick363]

@@emilemil7826 you believe your god is the first cause uncaused, but it’s not a fact of reality.

[@Bugsy0333]

No.

[@ernestfry6034]

First of all, it either makes me laugh or get angry when people says that there's no evidence for God.... Because there's Absolutely Continuous evidence for God...! The evidence has existed for thousands of years and millions of us experience it every single day. What it is is too many people out there refuse to examine the evidence and follow where it leads...!

[@therick363]

People present something as evidence so yes there’s evidence. The question is is it good evidence. Your last line comes off like if someone doesn’t come to the same conclusion as you that they are the one who is wrong…is that what you meant?

[@Bugsy0333]

The best evidence for a Creator would be for that Creator to show themself to all to see.However this Creator wishes to remain anonymous and have all it theist followers telling us all " YES" he/she /it is real ! Sorry i call BULLSHIT !

[@gregjones2217]

There is no credible proof of any god anywhere at any time.

[@kennethbest4640]

Yes, from where you are standing there is indeed zero credible evidence of any god. You just have to go come and rest now.

[@gregjones2217]

@@kennethbest4640 not sure of what your saying. I simply chose to stand on my own two feet rather than bow to an imaginary being.

[@papayamusicofficial7941]

@@gregjones2217To understand your statement correctly, you’re aiming to not be manipulated by what others think, nor aim to follow it because you rather stand by your own thinking. Correct?

[@ACuriousChild]

@@papayamusicofficial7941 Man's mind always - since THE GARDEN OF EDEN - has been prone to fall for its own PRIDE, ARROGANCE, IGNORANCE, HYPOCRISY AND HUBRIS! SOLI DEO GLORIA!

[@nickcalma222]

The fact that he's quoting other scientists that are atheist's and agnostic's and yet atheists and agnostic comments are disagreeing on what he's saying 😂😂

[@christopherpollard8420]

Of course this guy is brilliant, he’s from New Jersey.

[@texw4062]

I love these talks... but it's frustrating how much of these creationist speakers basically plagiarize Kent Hovind and never give him credit.

[@gtavtheavengergunnerlegend3340]

con man

[@dignaward6005]

If God is so pure, and created all thing's. Then he created Evil.

[@neoromanempire]

He made free will, or, better said, the ability to make choices. And we have the ability to choose evil.

[@zacthurman3701]

In the beginning (time) God created (matter) the heaven and the earth (space)

[@daniel1fullerton]

This statement is incoherent

[@zacthurman3701]

@@daniel1fullerton- You can't have one without the other two. They would have to be simultaneous. The "big bang" CAN NOT account for that. Why? Because the heliocentric "theory" is COMPLETELY UNPROVABLE BS! COHERENT?

[@daniel1fullerton]

@@zacthurman3701 you are arguing that the sun is not the center of the solar system? Time and space are dimensions, they are abstract.

[@zacthurman3701]

@@daniel1fullerton- "SPACE" doesn't exist in the way you think of it. A military guidens specialist can paint a target at a hundred miles when it should be behind over a mile of curvature? Polaris NEVER moves? Or the moon in relation to us? Or the constellations in relation to each other? "They" tell us 8in per mile squared is what the "curvature" works out too. 10 miles= 666 ft, "They" tell us we're at a 23.4 degree tilt, off of a vertical 90?=66.6? And that we're "flying around the sun" at 66,600 mph? REALLY? Who do you think is running this shit show? Real eyes, realize, real lies. I'm a scriptural literalist. I came to faith though the realization of truth through self education of suppressed but verifiable FACTS that are little known most. Although the algorithms of the youtube search engine have changed to put any REAL TRUTH channels behind so much BS it's hard to find GOOD INFO unless you have already subscribed to those channels. Truth channels recommended XtremeRealityCheck, aplaintruth.info, EYA, corbettreport, HighImpactFlix, Shaking My Head Productions, The Shroud of Turin and Ron Wyatt and ALL his discoverys. You can lead a fool to information but you can't make them believe it. Condemnation before investigation is the height of ignorance! Good luck brother! Sincerely I mean it! John 14:6

[@daniel1fullerton]

@@zacthurman3701 I see you have questions, that's good you have questions, better to question than not to question imo. When I say time and space are abstract, I'm speaking in terms of space has 3 dimensions with time as a fourth dimension. For example I slept 8 hours last night, 8 hours doesnt actually exist it just describes a change over the time dimension I experience within 3 D space, 3 D physical space being height, width, depth. The dimensions themselves dont exist, the matter which is my body, bed, etc does, not the numbers. There is a lot to dissect here, I assume you also believe the earth is flat. For starters, none of these claims you are challenging are that outrageous. We are moving with the earth at a constant velocity, imagine sitting in a car at 0 mph and at 60 mph. There is no difference. You would feel a change in velocity if you went from 0-60 in 2 seconds though!! The earth is HUGE man, 23.4 degree tilt is nothin, look at Uranus! Uranus has a crazy tilt at 98 degrees! The moon does orbit the earth in 27 days! That's why we have full moon, no moon, and everything in between. Everything moves in the universe ipso facto, let me put this into perspective for you, the milky way is approximately 100,000 ly (light years, distance light travels in a year) across. Our solar system takes approximately 250 million light years to orbit the milky way. All of the constellations including polaris are in the milky way galaxy, so imagine a couple thousands years is absolutely nothing when we are talking about millions of light years to orbit the galaxy, that's why you observe the illusion that they everything looks fixed.

[@kjstars]

Thank God. And thank Trump for killing ISIS.

[@berenc7619]

ISIS is not dead , they are disrupted and disbanded and has gone underground , picking it's wounds as it were, but not dead.

[@pepsimax6671]

you lost me at trump , he is bad and its sad you dont know that

[@chrisanderson5317]

​@@pepsimax6671well it is true Trump gave the military an order to drive ISIS out of Iraq and it happened in 4 mos. Obama dithered around until ISIS gained control of an area the size of West Virginia with oil fields with which they financed their operations. Yet the brilliant (in his own mind) Obama called them "the JV team."

[@DrBiBeatz]

God exists but it not what you think of a man been seating on a throne controlling everything. You're God and so 7 billion people on this earth. God is the all Energy that exists in this universe so God is Energy E=MC2

[@daniel1fullerton]

My god is a^2 + b^2 = c^2 and he is better than your god!!!

[@daniel1fullerton]

@dom com. stfu you flat earther imbecile.

[@tomwinchester55]

Intelligent design....scientific evidence? Most of this has been debated so many times......getting really old....time to move on!

[@2fast2block]

Then give the solution that settled it all. You skipped that part.

[@tomwinchester55]

@@2fast2block plenty of presentations on KZbin.....I don't research for others...good luck in your research.

[@2fast2block]

@@tomwinchester55 you're really funny. I have to do research that you can't supply yourself. You can make any claim you want and that's good enough for you, but when you're called on it, then it shows how clueless you are.

[@tomwinchester55]

@@2fast2block rest assured....I have done the research.

[@tomwinchester55]

@@2fast2block you are a science denier....I can't help you.

[@royglenn2487]

Nonsense you say, have you read the bible?

[@DameEh25]

I have

[@nickcalma222]

yea, certainly you haven't that's for sure

[@zbdbz]

Frank Turek is brilliant at speaking authoritatively. His arguments are laughable, though.

[@lohkie2__3]

A theistic god? ....So a God that believes in a God and or gods?

[@pepsimax6671]

what you smoking , your statement make no sense

[@lohkie2__3]

@@pepsimax6671 makes perfect sense a theistic person is someone who believes in a god.

[@lohkie2__3]

@Miguel Cisneros just talking about a gud being a theist you know....

[@2fast2block]

"A theistic god? ....So a God that believes in a God and or gods?" Are you permitted to be on a computer? If so, maybe you should stop embarrassing yourself by saying such stupid things.

[@francisomigie3399]

Ladies and gentlemen, science has proven that there is God!

[@cindychristman8708]

Science is the study of the natural world through observation and experimentation. It is recognized in science that no scientific hypothesis or theory is ever proven to be certain, as it is always possible that future data may contradict it. Hence, a scientific theory can only be disproved and not proved. Any scientific hypothesis has to be falsifiable and the phenomenon has to be detectable. God is neither detectable or falsifiable.

[@2fast2block]

@@cindychristman8708 you are so clueless. "Science is the study of the natural world through observation and experimentation." Yes, and creation had to happen naturally or supernaturally. Science proves 100% it can't happen naturally but to you, naturally still won somehow. You're such a joke. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space, and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.

[@cindychristman8708]

@@2fast2block How would you demonstrate the supernatural?

[@cindychristman8708]

@@2fast2block Please stop with the personal attacks and try to focus on the subject at hand. I will stop engaging with you if you can't reign yourself in.

[@happilysecular2323]

“I don’t have enough faith to be an atheist” LOL already this video is fallacious crap. Faith is belief without evidence, not disbelief without evidence.

[@tomwinchester55]

Exactly...he tries to tell atheists what and who they are.

[@jacobhegardt6238]

Faith is not belief without evidence. That statement is actually self defeating because you have faith, that faith is believing something without evidence. You took some evidence to come to the conclusion that faith is believing without evidence and in doing that you had faith you were right, you refuted yourself. You have faith your car will not explode when you start it, because the evidence shows that rarely happens. I have faith my heart will continue beating to finish typing this comment because the evidence shows I am healthy and don’t have any heart diseases or issues. Everyone has faith based off of evidence and to say faith is based on believing with no evidence is fallacious! He named the lecture “I don’t have enough faith to be an atheist” because there is no evidence for evolution or atheism (that’s why I myself don’t have enough faith to be an atheist!) yet many are still atheists based on blind faith. I’m sure you are happily secular in your life right now. I don’t even know you yet I genuinely care for you and love you and hope you will one day be drawn to seek after Jesus Christ. Don’t judge Christianity based on its abuse and hypocrisy. Judge it off of Jesus Christ.

[@happilysecular2323]

Jacob Hegardt First of all, “faith” is not using the correct definitions for words. Secondly, evolution has been tested in labs and used for medicine on a daily basis. I’m still waiting for the creatard explanation for antibiotic research, ERVs, ring species, continental distribution, atavisms and the observable speciation in American Goatsbeard flowers. Third, atheism is a lack of belief in deities and makes no claims so I have no idea what you mean by “evidence for atheism”. Forth, Jesus has been dead for 2,000 years and nobody truly knows him. Thought it’s funny how he was somehow catholic, protestant, baptist, methodist, mormon and quaker all at once.

[@nickcalma222]

yea but still, the arguments and claims that he makes are true.

[@felixleonardogamonelcruzad7704]

That comedian was an ignorant

[@mynameisnobody3931]

I don't agree with the infinite argument. That if the universe never had a beginning but always existed and is infinite both in time and size. That today would never arrive. I disagree there. You could be somewhere on that timeline. And time still moves. Also the same apllys to Heaven and Hell. There it is infinite. So the same logic would apply here. You cant be outside these terms. For example you cant create a square circle. In churches there are even symbols of infinity. So I dont understand all this And actually now scientists as Brian Cox says that the universe is infinite. And that to me is not an argument against God at all! On the contrary. We're discussing the wrong things here in my opinion

[@johnjohn4456]

He says right in the video that Hubble and Einstein proved it had a beginning. Not infinite.

[@mynameisnobody3931]

@@johnjohn4456Brian Cox now says that it is infinite as I wrote. Didn't have a beginning

[@garyleemusic]

Look up hilbert’s hotel. An actual infinite is irrational.

[@mynameisnobody3931]

@@garyleemusic kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnaWlaSie993m8k look at this

[@Yessentuki4]

its just math (if you took calculus) you cannot reach infinity, its called a limit in math. So if you had an infinite amount of events (time) before right now, you'd never reach this moment in time. Because as soon as you reach any number, you can always add +1 and so its a limit. Unreachable. You get infinitely close to it, but you never actually reach it.

[@frenkvortice3858]

earth is flat big fart never happened.

[@jeffreysegal2065]

Therefore god? That's just boneheaded.

[@pepsimax6671]

Not as bad as who created god , thats pretty stupid

[@2fast2block]

"Therefore god? That's just boneheaded." No, therefore a supernatural creator. Once that is established, the one looks for evidence that supports the true supernatural creator. That is the God of the bible. Now look at your stupid side In other words, your god of worship. The atheist/agnostic god. I HATE your god. the god of nothing. Your god claims to have given us the universe, fine-tuning of the universe for life, life from non-life, information for life before and after it began, the laws of nature, etc, etc, when we know that your god of nothing can do nothing. Your god of nothing has nothing to offer and its followers only offer nothing of evidence for their god of nothing. That makes them nothing of importance but the followers of the god of nothing are so delusional that they think they do have something to offer to defend their god of nothing.

[@ramigilneas9274]

@@2fast2block At least you admit that you only believe in God because all of the scientific explanation make you sad. But don’t worry, most Christians believe for emotional reasons.

[@2fast2block]

@@ramigilneas9274 b-itch, let's go down my list. First....Your god claims to have given us the universe, How did your god of nothing create the universe by natural means? Dingbat, just some BASIC science shows that can't be. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. So give me a good laugh and try to prove me wrong. You can't because you love being the waste of life you are. But still, try. "most Christians believe for emotional reasons." Then, bozo, this will be easy for you since I just go by emotion. Again, humor me, you stu-pid clown.

[@tonymitchell8563]

Does god exist? Nobody has been able to provide any evidence that stands up to scrutiny. I've watched 3 hours of Turek videos and nothing he says is convincing. Even his video called "Evidence" is a joke. May be he should spend more time trying to come up with explanations that are not just bald-faced assertions without evidence or logical fallacies. But I can tell you one thing Turek is VERY good at doing: Selling his books. It's what con men do.

[@user-wi7br4nj6p]

Interesting you say that. I think turek provides good evidence. I havent seen an atheist bring up good arguments either. Complain all you want about the Christian God, I haven't seen an atheist provide a legit, scientific argument. I'd like to see a video or something, you know of one?

[@tonymitchell8563]

@@user-wi7br4nj6p You are just trying to shift the burden of proof. I'm not saying there is no god. I'm saying I can't believe you until you prove it. Im nit trying to convince you there is no god. Im saying i have no reason to believe. Truth requires verification. Nothing Turek said was convincing as everything he said was flawed. You believe. You say you have the truth and I don't. Whst proved to YOU that you have the truth?

[@user-wi7br4nj6p]

@@tonymitchell8563 Ah gotcha. Sorry brother if I offended you in way, I had no intentions. I think the proof is there. Are the arguments that Dr.Turek provides confusing? The universe is BEYOND overly complicated, so something has to sustain it, no? Dr.Turek provides evidence that there was a beginning to a universe, so someone who transcends it must have created it. Can you name something specific as to what he said was flawed? I know you probably don't want to hear this, but if you're looking for truth, taking everything into deep consideration and speculation should always be evaluated. Many manuscripts, scrolls, and other ancient writings prove that Jesus Christ existed and VERY strong evidence that he died and resurrected, all while predicting all that. Dr. Turek, I believe, has a lecture on the validity of the New Testament and the whole Bible, really. Once you believe that surely there is a Being beyond our universe that created and sustained us, you could look into numerous religions who believe in a God, or even many gods. Maybe we haven't truly discovered the true Being? Personally, I think there is strong evidence for the Christian God being the Being. And yes, there are theological explanations and answers to many questions you may have, probably not only Christianity. And yes he does a great job of selling his book haha cause I got it. Not a fan of the aesthetic but thats subjective. The book provides clear arguments that i think is worth considering to read if you are on the quest for truth. I do not know how to explain the confirmation I have of my faith, but that doesn't mean I can't explain it so thats my fault for not being prepared. Throughout my life, there is no way things happened the way they did. I truly believe miracles and supernatural wonders have happened which means something must have caused. I wish you best of luck my friend on your quest for truth. But keep in mind, its better when you look for truth, but when truth finds you, its not pretty.

[@tonymitchell8563]

Tim No...I'm not confused by Turek. I can debunk everything he says. You say I might be confused. Ever consider I'm not confused but you've been conned? Just because something is complicated doesn't mean something needs to sustain it. An ecosystem is a very complex thing. Each and every species of plants and animals are in balance in a complex variety on interconnected environments. In science thst is called "equilibrium". That equilibrium SUSTAINS ITSELF!!! And if sonething drastically changes the equilibrium, guess what happens? The ecosystem change until a new equilibrium is achieved. There are thousands of examples from around The world where an ecosystem was in equilibrium on its own and when an outside change occurred, this incredibly complex interaction of tens of thousands of different species of plants and animals found a new equilibrium. Ecosystems are incredibly complex environments that sustain THEMSELVES, A great example of this would be when oil platforms were first built in the Gulf of Mexico and other waterways around the world. Environmentalist were worried about the damage to such A complex ecosystem of fish and plants and physical environment. The equilibrium would be destroyed. But guess what happened? Algae started growing on the legs of platforms. This provided food for smaller fish. The platforms provided some protection for these smaller species to proliferate. This over abundance caused more predators to arrive…some for the over abundance of smaller fish but some for other predators. Eventually, a new equilibrium occurred and the complex ecosystem SUSTAINED ITSELF!!! No need for a god. 've now provided an example of concrete situations that can be verified all over the world of a complicated system sustaining itself. That means a supreme being isn’t necessary in some circumstances. That removes the need for a supreme being unless you can provide proof it exists. Also, simply asserting there has to be something to maintain a complex system has its own issues. First, you have to provide evidence for your assertion. I can claim that the complex system is maintained by intergalactic space pixies. Now how do we ascertain which assertion is true? Next, asserting there has to be something to maintain a complex system…even if I was to grant that to you, you have provided no Evidence that it is your god. As a matter of fact, you haven’t provided any evidence that it A GOD AT ALL!! Another assertion without evidence. By claiming it has to be something sustaining it, you are engaging in the logical fallacy “Argument From Ignorance”. That by definition makes your argument irrational . Those are my comments on just the first part of your response. I have just as much information on 5he rest of your post, but I have no reason to add on until you can defend my response.

[@user-wi7br4nj6p]

@@tonymitchell8563 absolute there might be a chance that I've been conned. I don't think that though. And I'm sure you have more to debunk on his claims. If these self-sustaining ecosystems, environments, or other things can run themselves, what put them there in the first place? Basically I'm asking what do you think created the universe? Dr. Turek provides evidence that the universe has had a beginning, indicating that something of have happened, we believe and a creator created it. Hope you don't mind answering my questions but if it's too long of an answer and you don't want to, that's fine.

[@brads5690]

These videos only seem to make good points when they are speaking to an uninformed crowd. When ever they debate someone actually intelligent it shows the flaws in their arguments and lack of knowledge.

[@2fast2block]

"it shows the flaws in their arguments and lack of knowledge." Great. I believe in a supernatural creation. You don't. You claim to be informed and I'm not. Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. So, give your science to counter mine that proves you're the one informed. In other words, give me a good laugh. Don't say we don't know because I just showed we know. Don't give science fiction because it does not trump science. And no matter how much I say that, I get "we just don't know for sure" and science fiction from you "well informed".

[@2fast2block]

@Kelyaan, here's me, "Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it." Here's what is considered science to counter the science I gave, "That all you have ? a copy and paste reply? think for yourself and write things out instead of doing what every other believer does and copies from their script ;)" I wrote that originally. Sorry that your dumb ass wants words changed around each time I bring it up. Monkey brain, since it's so common to you then why don't you EVER offer science to prove me wrong? Why do you cling to being such a dumbass? Just shut up and give your science how creation happened naturally. Can you EVER muster up enough brain cells and courage to do that? We all need the laugh, so just do it.

[@2fast2block]

@Kelyaan "If the universe a closed or isolated system? " "If". You have proof it's not an isolated system, please give it. lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26508 ----"Isolated systems can exchange neither energy nor matter with an outside system. While they may be portions of larger systems, they do not communicate with the outside in any way. The physical universe is an isolated system; a closed thermos bottle is essentially an isolated system (though its insulation is not perfect)."---- www.bluffton.edu/homepages/facstaff/bergerd/NSC_111/thermo2.html There is NO evidence to show otherwise. Only dumbasses make up "If". "who says the universe is a perfect isolated system." Any rational, honest, sane person who knows science and goes by what the science proves. Oh, that's not you. "You do not get to force in supernatural bullshit just because you do not have an answer for something" I gave you science you could not counter. You just showed how stupid you are. I showed you what we know and have NO doubts about. We have two choices, natural or supernatural. Natural lost 100% but dumbasses like you declare it the winner. And your science is "If". "had to go so low as to insult me," You proved yourself a dumbass and that's the correct title for you. You should NOT be called smart. Dumbasses want good titles for being stupid. It's their spoiled brat mentality when they don't get their way. Always a pleasure bitch-slapping fools like you.

[@2fast2block]

@Kelyaan, go ahead and be the clown you love to be. You'll certainly get yours in the end. How wonderful that will be. ================================ @Kelyaan "If the universe a closed or isolated system? " "If". You have proof it's not an isolated system, please give it. lavelle.chem.ucla.edu/forum/viewtopic.php?t=26508 ---"Isolated systems can exchange neither energy nor matter with an outside system. While they may be portions of larger systems, they do not communicate with the outside in any way. The physical universe is an isolated system; a closed thermos bottle is essentially an isolated system (though its insulation is not perfect)."--- www.bluffton.edu/homepages/facstaff/bergerd/NSC_111/thermo2.html There is NO evidence to show otherwise. Only dumbasses make up "If". "who says the universe is a perfect isolated system." Any rational, honest, sane person who knows science and goes by what the science proves. Oh, that's not you. "You do not get to force in supernatural bullshit just because you do not have an answer for something" I gave you science you could not counter. You just showed how stupid you are. I showed you what we know and have NO doubts about. We have two choices, natural or supernatural. Natural lost 100% but dumbasses like you declare it the winner. And your science is "If". "had to go so low as to insult me," You proved yourself a dumbass and that's the correct title for you. You should NOT be called smart. Dumbasses want good titles for being stupid. It's their spoiled brat mentality when they don't get their way. Always a pleasure bitch-slapping fools like you.

[@2fast2block]

@dom com. your way of wording is confusing to me. Are you agreeing that cosmic evolution is a giant mess? This is what this video was about. They showed Krauss lying about what nothing is AND what nothing can do. Do you agree with what Krauss said or not?

[@jamesford5278]

Dont listen to this guy about anything unless he's quoting a bible verse.

[@2fast2block]

He believes creation was done by God supernaturally. Tell me why I should not believe that. Give me the laugh.

[@nickcalma222]

so just because he hasn't quoted the bible makes him wrong?

[@mindofmayhem.]

Who likes a little false science with their false religion? This Guy!!! lol

[@daydayall-day668]

Welp, haters gunna hate.

[@YeshuaSaves3]

-OK Internet- Prove it.

[@pepsimax6671]

Oh please enlighten us , tell us were he is wrong?

[@YeshuaSaves3]

Pepsi Max Haha good luck for a true response.

[@2fast2block]

"Who likes a little false science with their false religion?" YOU DO! The atheist/agnostic god. I HATE your god. the god of nothing. Your god claims to have given us the universe, fine-tuning of the universe for life, life from non-life, information for life before and after it began, the laws of nature, etc, etc, when we know that your god of nothing can do nothing. Your god of nothing has nothing to offer and its followers only offer nothing of evidence for their god of nothing. That makes them nothing of importance but the followers of the god of nothing are so delusional that they think they do have something to offer to defend their god of nothing.

[@daniel7316]

Wrong in every word

[@jonathanmatt6754]

None believer wheres your proof???

[@markaponte7057]

This guy is so wrong in so many ways assertions after assertions

[@daydayall-day668]

Ok soooo what is he wrong about?

[@markaponte7057]

@@daydayall-day668 to start the cosmological argument doesn't lead to a God. It just leads to a cause. He just jokes his way thru his talk.

[@markaponte7057]

@@daydayall-day668 to be honest I would have to 2atch this again and it was too painful to watch it once twice is torture

[@daydayall-day668]

@@markaponte7057 sounds like you also have a strong bias. By your own words you're actually no different.

[@markaponte7057]

@@daydayall-day668 I'm not the one preaching lies to a crowd