Freak from Vult - Manifold filter for Eurorack

[@obsidiananvil9719]

I'm looking forward to building one of these. Glad it's available as a DIY kit, and that the build guide is so well written.

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Oh nice! Have fun!

[@chemicalBR0]

this sounds really good I'm tempted

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Yeah, it's a nice one!

[@InvertedPopesMusic]

Love a bit of self oscillation really nice. Only managed first 5 mins as have to go out will catch rest of this excellent sounds module later.

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Yeah, it has a really nice and round sound.

[@Synthetrix]

Very cool. I wish I could find one assembled.

[@510th]

new "eurorack channel" for me this week and I'm enjoying your style and what you demo/show... thanks! subscribed!

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Hey, thank you so much!

[@KNHSynths]

You did a great job in this video. Thanks !

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Thanks!

[@princessgarfi3ld]

I would love to see some more tutorials on Nysthi modules! They’re so baffling to me

[@chridmeister]

I just bought one of these, you're making me want a second one already and the first one isn't even built yet

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Yeah, it's such a great module...

[@ledgendairy3056]

I am adding this to my Eurorack asap....I feel I should buy it since I use the software modules everyday for almost free! Plus it is unique , I cant wait to get it

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Hey, nice! There are some interesting things in this one for use with hardware, and more things are coming in the future also so it's a great module to have!

[@izzywalker471]

Damn, wish I had found out about this before I setup my current kit, now it's on backorder. I would have skipped a few other modules.

[@spunoza808]

Omri, How does the hardware version of Freak compare to the VCV Rack version? Given that it’s still a digital filter, can it sound any better than the VCV version? I have an ES-9, so I can just run audio from Eurorack into Freak in VCV and then back out to Eurorack. Is there any benefit to having the hardware version? Thanks, Rob

[@Vult-DSP]

One difference is that the hardware has very low latency (about 300 micro seconds) and it runs by default at 96 kHz. You can run the software through and use you audio card, but if you have to do that ver often, the physical module is much better option.

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Well, for me, it's just like why I have all of the other modules. I can do everything in vcv but I enjoy much more the combination of both. And also, there's a creativity difference between them. I tend to use hardware differently then modules in vcv. Not better, but differently. And as I always say, why not have both 🙂

[@spunoza808]

@@Vult-DSP Thanks Leonardo. I think you just sold another hardware module.

[@andrak5946]

What a lot of mushrooms

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Not enough!

[@matthsmatthsmatths]

Great video and very versatile filter! Is this essentially the code from VCV placed into a circuit and then put behind a hardware panel?

[@Vult-DSP]

Yes. It is the same code. There are a few minor changes but that’s it.

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Thanks! Yeah, as Leonardo mentioned, it's the same code but it will run at 96kHz and with less latency.

[@radcliffe2192]

Omri just dropped fire track just while testing filter.

[@OmriCohen-Music]

It's an inspiring one!

this filter is incredible, my wallet will not thank you though :'(

[@OmriCohen-Music]

I still have it and I still use it all the time :)

[@anandanamaste2845]

So... no dual mode on the software version because two buttons cannot be pushed at the same time?

[@OmriCohen-Music]

Well, as I understood it, it will be way easier to just add another module in vcv than to add this feature.

[@anandanamaste2845]

Yes... of course. Thank you

[@SenfSenferson]

do you get paid by Leonardo to do this? ... I think you should :D

[@Vult-DSP]

Jens Wemhöner every time he says the word Vult I send him a 1up mushroom

[@ronsalsaky3999]

נייס

[@EntonDelMonte]

Sounds like the filter of a free VST plugin that was for some reason ported to hardware. Upside-down world.