Canon’s ANSWER to 3rd Party Lenses is THIS???

[@ItsPinecone_911]

Anyone who says you need to stay in your lane for politics obviously hasnt been watching your channel long. You always do the new president regardless if its republican or democrate. And I love them everytime you do then even if I dont support that president at the time. With that being said, yes Im a Trump supporter and personally I think his portrait is a tad too bright for me. Im curious to what the photo would look like with the exposure down just a tad. Like .3 or .5 at most. And yes I agree about Vance's eyes 100%.

[@jkteddy77]

If canon weren't still afraid, they'd open it up. Doesn't give me confidence in the mid-tier if Sigma's Art tier would cost the same, they're holding the ecosystem back because they know they're not the best

[@tenns]

it's not art it's a contemporary.

[@jkteddy77]

@@tenns It's not contemporary-priced... You could get an Art for $1100

[@boundaryscience]

Yeah dude. "Horror lighting." I'm terrified. I'm terrified, everyday. Perfect, no notes. The Vance portrait just needs a couch sobbing in the corner and it'd be perfect, too.

[@joeygwood]

If this is Canon's answer to the lack of 3rd party lenses, then it's not a great answer. They had plenty of options like this for the EF mount and people still looked to 3rd parties for affordable high quality glass because it was better than what Canon offered. I really hope they don't limit 3rd parties to APS-C.

[@occipitalexposure5059]

The RF licensing restriction was the main reason and final straw that pushed me over to Sony after 15yrs of shooting Canon. I don't want cheap alternative lenses, I want the option to explore the design and performance concepts from other lens manufacturers. I don't want to wait around for years until Canon releases a lens focal length or feature that fits THIER release roadmap.

[@noctwice]

I haven't switched yet but I totally agree. I shoot Zeiss adapted to EF which then has to be adapted again to RF. I also like the newer Sigma options on mirrorless. There is still a lot of things about Canon I like which why I have stuck by them but E mount is now much closer to what the EF mount used to be. A widely used mount with options for every type of user. You could also say the same about the available bodies. Now if only Sony would improve their menus. When another Zeiss lens finally breaks I will likely get ready to move over.

[@dannyd1485]

This is kinda old but you could either hotkey everything you need or put ur most used items in favorites.

[@TheNewMexicoMan]

Those lenses are expensive for consumer grade lenses. I'll stick to L lenses.

[@ZOB4]

Reserved for dictators you say?

[@Hellseeker1]

Do you even know what the definition of a dictator is? Because I'm having a hard time quaralating your comment to what the topic is about.

[@stevesharkey3312]

When you get your hands on these less than premium lenses they scream cheep. Sigma lenses that are equivalent feel like quality products - and they deliver on quality. I’m still predominantly a canon shooter but my lenses are mostly EF. Canon 100-400 l is II, sigma 85mm, 105mm, 135mm art lenses and 70-200mm & 500mm f/4 sport lenses

[@BruceBurke-o6x]

Manufacturers sure have a strange idea of what's affordable.

[@meynp4337]

I got the Tamron 17-28 f2.8 E mount for $699. Enjoy the low price and good quality pf 3rd party lens.

[@petrpohnan875]

In this case the low price matches well with the IQ you get for it...

[@ItsMidasProductions]

I like what Canon’s doing with these more affordable 2.8s. People are still complaining saying they’re expensive, but they’re the same price as sigma art lenses and I’m sure they wouldn’t complain about the price of those if they were ported to rf. I just wish they had some quality primes around the $900-1100 price range. The 1.4’s are great but at $1500 a pop it’s still hard to not look at the sigma’s sitting at like $900 and not want those. Regardless, good on Canon!

[@justinburley8659]

I don’t understand why people complain at Canon for expensive lenses, but Sony and Nikon make the same type of lenses for the same prices. I don’t hear complaints towards them! (Except for the people that think the photography gear shouldn’t cost more than $500 maximum)

[@ItsMidasProductions]

@ I’ll add to that because you can get ef lenses at more affordable prices than a lot of these mirrorless 3rd party options anyways. People act like rf HAS to be an expensive system and in reality that’s just not the case.

[@isntitweird5369]

Just get a 24-105 f/4 L lens. Same price and better in every way

[@justinburley8659]

@@isntitweird5369 But you get less light at f/4

[@babajaiy8246]

@@justinburley8659 True...and if one shoots often near dusk/dawn times - only having f/4 is a very significant limitation.

[@benjamin.kelley]

Not too keen on the Trump photo - it reminds me of wedding photographers who use strobes outside at sunset - it just looks unnatural and odd.

[@martinhommel9967]

Like Trump; unnatural and odd

[@CornPopsRazor]

I like it has a hard look to it. Vance photo needs to be pulled back.

[@sidvicious3129]

Canon is going to delay anymore third-party lenses as long as they can get away with it. They don't want prices to drop on their RF lenses. The STM has always been there and has always been an option, but a Tamron or Sigma alternative would be cheaper and would probably render their STM line irrelevant.

[@dannyd1485]

Canon can't compete at lower end with tamron or sigma glass most of the time and not to mention sigma higher end isn't that much more expensive than canon STM, viltrox is also pumping out fantastic lenses for the price. Haven't recommended canon since they blocked off third party to fellow photographers or families, stopped using canon cinema cameras too when they switched to the new mount and now I'm sporting Sony fx6 and fx3 instead 😆

[@sidvicious3129]

@@dannyd1485 You are exactly where I am mentally with Canon and it’s the only reason that I don’t own a Canon R3. I have shot the R3 and loved it personally but professionally for our business it’s Sony all the way and we also own the Fx6, FX3 Fx30s A7SIIIs and several other Sony bodies to include an A9 which we use for school sports. We own Sony GM, Zeiss, Tamron, Sigma and Dzofilm. This simply isn’t possible with Canon.

[@MaartenOosterbaan]

I am also still shooting Canon, but as an amateur I am still strictly shooting EF lenses with an adapter ring...of which I have several L lenses who were expensive but doable....

[@Hodenkat]

I get a laugh every time somebody says Canon has a new "affordable" lens out but Sigma has the same focal length and f-stop for $200 to $400 less! LOL! C'mon Canon! Let's get on the 3rd party wagon and drop the charade about "budget zooms" being produced as affordable. If you're comparing these new lenses to the pro L-series lenses that go for $3000 then I guess you can look at $1400 to $1800 as a budget offering, but not in my opinion. The Trump photo has poor lighting. They did it just to match his over-the-top vanity. If it used the same tonal and contrast mappings as all the other presidential photos it might blend it. Trump no doubt wanted it to stand out. WAY out.

[@KatapultGaming]

Calling this a more affordable lens is an affront to logic. *Ring* *Ring* Who's that? It's Aristotle and he's pissed, muttering something about wanting his logic back. I'd rather have Tamron's 17-28mm f/2.8 Di III RXD Lens for Sony E for a good chunk less cash. Proprietary lens mounts should be banned.

[@flyingmicrotonalbanana-k2i]

Hey, are you still shooting raw?

[@t_mcb_1342]

that trump photo reminds me of the painting of Vigo the Carpathian from "Ghost Busters II".

[@tayloriginals999]

This!!!

[@ejb_92]

😂 😂 😂

[@t_mcb_1342]

@ the photo is not in my possession.... i can't say this... cause it is not here with me but with another person THAT has it... I am pointing to that item over there, not this item here....

[@phelanwolf6747]

Like Jarred said it is a style for villains and dictators.

[@Dominik_1978]

Who you gonna call? 👻

[@robbygill824]

Video starts at 1:33

[@andrewade7017]

I don't believe Canon's 2nd tier non "L" lens offerings match the clarity or quality of the Sigma Art lens series or Tamron. I will continue to use my EF "L" glass and the one RF lens that I that I do own (RF 24 - 105) until Canon changes course on 3rd party full frame glass.

[@77dris]

Lenses are just too expensive in general it seems. Though, the Canon non L primes are REALLY affordable! The 35mm 1.8 RF lens is only $499 in Canadia! Yes, that's in Canadia dollars! And that lens is optically fantastic and has IS and macro to boot. Same with the 85 2.0! It's about $700 I think and has macro and IS as well. REALL great prices. The new 16-28 though is going to be at least $1500 in Canadia dollars I think which to me is about what I'd expect an L lens to be. I think that's what I paid new for the 16-35 L EF lens back in the day. Back then though I could get a Hershey's for a nickel... a NICKEL!

[@idol031808]

Your Trump photo critique was fair and much appreciated

[@TBGTOMPHOTO]

I wish Canon would open up third party so Tamron could make an RF mount for that 35-150 f/2-2.8... that would be awesome.

[@whosyabobby]

You must have saw my comment on the photo haha. You were trying to not offend that guy.

[@kennethlui2268]

Trump looks like he is going to revenge something. The VP looks like Chucky in Child's Play. I guess that is what they want.

[@vizualszounds6651]

canon is really trying to corner the market with this line of lense but sigma lenses are more reliable and sharper and can to stand up to the L series for the price of a stm lense.. just my thoughts

[@kaydawgy1999]

I don't mind them making cheaper RF lenses

[@scherge]

The 16-28 2.8 looks very interesting, especially for its weather sealing. Hope it'll perform good as well. I don't use wide angle lenses very often. Always borrow the RF 10-20 whenever I need one. However, not being able to use filters is a little annoying and it's just too expensive for what it is, imo. Looking forward to the wind tunnel test. A very important metric ☝️😌

[@Cloud_Effect]

10/10 Content Bro!

[@Hellseeker1]

Why can't they supply a lens hood?

[@Trojan0304]

Got from EBay Tamron 18-400 zoom for my T7i , happy to travel with less weight. No thanks to Canon😂

[@kingghidorah8106]

you should make a special where you shake your hair and show us how fluffy it is

[@rafalkonieczny]

I think we will see Sigma lenses after Canon gets their proposals first.

[@Matt.2024]

I really like the portrait but more so as a work of art and a story telling piece next to his first terms portrait. Fast forward 100 years to a high school student looking at past presidents and it immediately tells a story that gets you intrigued about who he was. But IMO for an official picture going in the books I think the less processing the better. You can get creative with the lighting but I think it should all be done in camera. A lot of comments here can't seem to focus on the photo aspect only of the segment though unfortunately.

[@benjamin.kelley]

You can get a Canon EF - L II or III lens used plus an EF/RF adapter for that price. Not worth it.

[@truthseeker6804]

no IS on ef, bigger and heavier with adapter . i would trade my ef Lii for this if possible

[@alienhatz3265]

@@truthseeker6804 lenses don't have ibis

[@gamebuster800]

Honeybook? What an unfortunate name lol

[@jsan7610]

Review the RF 24mm 1.4 VCM for video

[@masterinico]

3:24 I think this instax will blow up with ravers and the teen / college crowd as they love that analog look / feel and instant image they can hold but they are vain and want the “perfect shot” as well.

[@travissmarion]

I'm extremely confused with both those portraits if I'm being honest. I wouldn't even call myself a real professional photographer right now. More like semi professional and I could have done a lot better job. But honestly to each their own. Both images seem highly over processed with too much Photoshop work done. IMO portraits should look natural.

[@simonmaduxx6777]

White walker LOLOLOLOLOLOOLOL 😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉 HILARIOUS

[@Ybalrid]

I dislike the idea of an Instax printer. I want the camera to expose the film.

[@sdkgodeacs]

Would love an updated review of the Instax printers. I've considered getting one, but wasn't thrilled with the results of one of my child's Instax cameras

[@magnus547]

My opinion is like you said, the lighting is usually used for villains. He also wanted it to look like his mug shot, which is a photo usually taken of people who commit crimes. And He is a convicted felon. So.....yeah, it's perfect. It's exactly what it should have been and how I see him.

[@johnbrodnik839]

Yes, He’s out selling! 😊

[@Elijah-Peterson04]

At this point I'm switching to Sony when I'm able to afford the switch. I'm a student and cant afford L series glass, and don't like canons limited other options. I will buy canon glass, I just don't think they have a good selection and price for lots of different focal lengths.

[@v_stands_for_value124]

They'll never be like having the Sigma lineup, I'd buy 0 canon lenses

[@PixeloProGear]

You can get a used 15-35mm f2.8 L for about $1400 used now days. Might be better off going that rough. But this is a much more compact lens.

[@walkersunited332]

RF version?

[@PixeloProGear]

@ yea I just got one from a guy at $1400. Beautiful condition. I see them on marketplace quite a bit between $1450-$1600 usually. Not bad. I still think this 16-28 is a nice addition to the RF mount. A more compact option, same with the 28-70mm f2.8.

[@zenofthemoment]

It just weighs too much for a walking around/hiking lens. Mine will be strictly reserved for work, whereas this new lens seems like a nice alternative to the kit lenses for walking around. Especially appreciate that it’s weather sealed.

[@MilmidStudios]

I like the portrait 😬

[@JimEmbury]

Thanks!

[@jej7117]

Wheres the fx3 mark 2

[@viralvidsbrother]

froknows how to lift weights too apparently... holy

[@macbaar6073]

ok if this new lens would go for 699$

[@vacuumandgaspressurecoexisting]

Doesn't come with a lens hood, but at least they are giving us a rubber seal at the mount now.

[@boundaryscience]

Why can't they just put rubber on the camera?

[@jgaffney567]

​@@boundarysciencebecause some lenses are weather resistant and some aren't..using just the camera needlessly ads to wear

[@justinburley8659]

It’s actually weather sealed throughout the body. Go check it out if you don’t believe me!

[@jgaffney567]

@justinburley8659 again but not all lenses are ..the ones on the camera are not wear issues usually

[@jeffreyklaum13]

How does someone who admittedly says they’ve never done a studio portrait get to do a presidential portrait as their first?

[@Drkbardockssj]

Yeah, it has to be about who you know and then somebody who got to shoot the NBA players before the All-Star game and it was because his uncle worked there

[@SirTubeALotMore]

What happened to the G9X mk3

[@nsbhagwat]

The honey book ad reminded me of the erstwhile Quick book.

[@Mosesybanez]

Instax okay, canon lens great , mugshot dictator lighting photography to be dark over edited and creepy trying to lie to you and scare you at the same time. ... your right it fits the narrative and fits the subject and it's intentions. Prefect photo.

[@The_Idea_of_Dream_Vision]

I wonder if canon will release a 3rd lens 70-150 f2.8bto make it a trinity of cheaper lenses

[@ElMundoDuro]

Sigma should just cut all their lens prices as much as they can in order to help more people move over to systems that Sigma sells lenses for. Then Sigma will sell more lenses and still make lots of money....

[@macbaar6073]

Coming soon import taxes!

[@tubularificationed]

So that everyone in the US will have to shoot with only Kodak and Polaroid again? 😉

[@factainment_1]

Good News, for Canon

[@NoSuRReNDeR001]

As a Vegan I want a camera that prints on paper, I wish I could shoot film but its goes against my ethical stance... and still to this day no one can make film with no animal un-aliving in the emulsion...

[@bonenyamom4977]

Trump obviously took inspiration from Vigo the Carpathian in Ghostbusters 2.

[@cafnated]

Love the major league reference, that made me lol

[@JonathanMorley]

Trump's portrait looks like AI

[@TheNewMexicoMan]

The trump image is just a clue of what's in his heart, if he has one.

[@kiv9431]

Somehow only Canon cameras look the most dated to me. Not saying Nikon or Sony look futuristic or anything but Canon looks the oldest for some reason. Weird I know

[@kmh032008]

The portraits have that over processed Lightroom look. Subtly AI-ish.

[@fracturedhipster]

Agree to your points, although “garrishly AI-ish” might be closer to the mark.

[@game2572]

The President and Vice President portraits look more like images than pictures if you get where i am going

[@richiecabral3602]

Did Mr. I Shoot Raw, really just say that he wants one and done?

[@madonna816]

Hybrid, because capitalism & the cup is empty.

[@PaulMcElligott]

Honey, probably isn’t the name you want to associate yourself with right now.

[@lamkiska]

I heard nothing💪🏾

[@vivalasvegas702]

Inspiration……his “mugshot”, how appropriate! 😂👌👍

[@PaulChoate-s4v]

Holy crap. 3-1/2 minutes of pushing product.

[@f800gt76]

Wanna instax back for my Mamiya 645 AFD

[@ourtvchannel]

Panasonic 10 years too late with phase detect autofocus, Canon years late with third party lenses. Panasonic are out for the count and Canon let Sony go from zero to leaders. I am shocked if a day goes by without a new E Mount lens.

[@lbeetech]

Trump is a dictator and is a horror show....

[@benjamin.kelley]

If your comment isn't about the photography, keep it out of here.

[@lbeetech]

@benjamin.kelley The picture looks that way. Get your Trump loving butt out of here. Trump took the picture this way on purpose.

[@tdawg719]

Cry about it. This isn’t the place.

[@johnbrodnik839]

Said the person who wants lower taxes and less government intrusion…

[@gopikanchi2438]

Hi sir🎉

[@am_9944]

the photographer is so bad.

[@TheChiggerBug]

The worst decision Daniel torok made was using Nikon. The second was the god awful lighting

[@jefferyedison2852]

I'm unsure how using Nikon is the "worst decision." Any camera is capable of taking portraits in a controlled environment...

[@hntrains2]

The Canon's answer starts at 3:28!

[@TerrenceW]

Hopefully this is the last video featuring Dump. I can't seem to even get away from his face, watching KZbin 🤦🏿‍♂️.

[@chrislognshot]

will he ever cut the hair for charity

[@jamesmachado8874]

Make photography great again!

[@ytj22]

Instax purist

[@factainment_1]

That is not an affordable option lens from canon

[@anthonyk27]

sigma and Tamron lens cost the same, brand new.

[@Mosesybanez]

Its an affordable variable zoom 2.8 lens if it can match quailty of the third party mid to higher end lens . I haven't tried it but most of canons rf 2.8 stm lenses are pretty decent and you get 100 percent compatability canons name matching your canon camera sigmas bottom tier C lenses are 800 to 900 dollars there sport and art lenses are more if canon can hit above the Sigmas C lens for a couple hundred more thats not a bad price. Everyone wants top end gear at bottom end money. 500 600 dollars isn't affordable really either to alot of ppl sigmas making great lenses in that prices range and above for equivalent focal ranges. Its alot more affordable then canons L glass at 2000 to 4000 dollars. I have 1 l lens I'll say it's worth the money but I can't afford to be buying 2000 plus lenses all the time . 800 to 1100 is a good price point to save up and spend on a nice lens. Now if if turns out to be trash then sure

[@carerra911]

" I wish I didnt like the portrait" we all know what idiotic stance you are then

[@romankuhler]

I love the way they are going. Canons own third party lenses with real canon quality glass😄👍

[@DaneRThomas]

If you had said that one pound was equal to 454 grams, you would have been correct. (453.592g, to be more exact.)

[@pavanpatel1090]

👍👍

[@mvp_kryptonite]

Canon finish this affordable 2.8 range, then move onto 2.0 zooms!

[@credos97]

Canon is building a true high-quality not-so-expensive lineup like Sigma and Tamron (+ others) did it for Sony. They filled the autofocus gap a few years ago and are now on part with Sony, they're ahead in video, now they're closing the gap rapidly with these lenses. Hopefully Sony will wake up and offer nice bodies like the R8 at the $1000-1500 price range !

[@moontecker]

Stick with photography bro

[@finesse49]

He did.