Frozen South: Antarctica 24 hour Sun 4K

[@BockXO]

Thanks Professor Stick :D

[@marcocappelli2236]

Just came for the same reason....

[@naruino1000]

Same

[@jacintovski]

Same

[@toxicatto6074]

Birdy same

[@keopsps3474]

Same reason:-)

[@Bnio]

I love that not only did the maker of this set up a timelapse camera, but a timelapse camera for the timelapse camera.

[@seapurrrtle]

Bnio I hate that they didn’t set up a timelapse camera for the time lapse camera for the time lapse camera that’s why I disliked this video

[@JohnV170]

​@@seapurrrtleexactly! Now we don't know if the time lapse camera camera was fake!

[@RUS38]

@@JohnV170 we don’t know, but we can’t deny it was most likely fake

[@OGMeatball]

@@RUS38 was or is 🤔

[@spookmaster0057]

Professor Stick, anyone?

[@saintq3888]

We all know this is fake...the sun is made of cheese ! Or was it the moon...damn you Doctor Who !

[@tuschman168]

Which video of him sent you here? I'd like to watch it.

[@8bitarmory846]

@@tuschman168 kzbin.info/www/bejne/iqmYmJeDdpqkn6M (yes, I know this is 3 months late)

[@lljrlucas]

The sunshine is very strange and unchanging.

[@sofrik9715]

FAKE THIS VIDEO IS FAKING THE FAKE FOR FAKE PURPOSES !!!!

[@swansyboy8512]

the camera follows the sun at the same rotation speed as the Earth (but in the opposite direction ofcourse) in order to have it basicly stay still on the footage. Since the lightrays keep following mostly the same path, there's very little difference.

[@swansyboy8512]

@@sofrik9715 You say it's fake based on what? Your intuition or actual evidence? Purely because it does not work with your theory you call it fake? If us, globe Earthers, try to prove that your footage is false, we give evidence, either through math and physics, or through phenomenons which can easily be tested to be impossible or that show obvious editing. (one example is a certain video of a "flat horizon" that have been used by many flat-earthers, even though we tested it's "flatness" with a few straight lines and noticed it to be concave as it goes under the lines. I dont have a link, but you'll probably find this easily with a quick google search)

[@sofrik9715]

@@swansyboy8512 My comment was a joke, I'm not that stupid.

[@swansyboy8512]

@@sofrik9715 Ah, ok, my bad. In my defense, there are a lot of idiots here claiming that it is fake, so maybe you could've made it a little clearer? eg. using sArCaSm TeXt

[@seanb3516]

Came here because Prof. Stick encouraged me to. Absolutely beautiful!

[@renatopereira1121]

It's really nice just the sun looks so fake and the way he shine's

[@henrylinks1087]

the second sun was real and imo, about to "set" but a convenient edit cuts the video short so i guess we will never know... is this the only 24hr footage? "you can tell it's real cause it looks so fake, honestly" _nervous giggle and body shift, adjust the tie when you lie, oh shit, this is being filmed, play cool._ *stares creepiest* _i think i just swallowed my tongue quite literally. play cool._ *stares creepiest intensifies* _i need water_ ~a lone, kums

[@accursedcursive4935]

Fake, you should be able to see at least one of the Great Elephants this far south.

[@nevolight1263]

10/10-ign "It's funny"-ign

[@dillon8124]

Here its a perfect example of an unfunny joke comment on KZbin

[@sholva6809]

Lol gotta love making fun of flat earthers with Discworld

[@SwartieLoveJoy]

I have already settled the FE vs Globe issue one and for all with 100% verifiable proof that you don't even need to leave your living room to verify. Here is the 100% proof Earth is not a spinning ball: 1) THERE IS NO ZIG-ZAG OF THE SUN WHEN RECORDING A 24 HR TIME LAPSE VIDEO OF THE 24 HR ARCTIC SUN (NORTH OF THE ARCTIC CIRCLE) On a spinning ball Earth, there MUST BE a zig-zag of the Sun above the mountain ranges or horizon. Instead, a 360 circling of the Sun is recorded. Think about this very carefully, and you can even test it with a model by placing a tiny camera on a huge beach ball or weather balloon and put model trees everywhere on top of it, making sure the camera is not on the North Pole axis, but is near, but above, the Arctic Circle. Keep the trees and Sun (light bulb across the room) in the camera's view while recording a full 360 revolution of the ball, and you will record a zig-zag Sun that moves above the trees from left to right, then right to left. It is impossible to record the light bulb making a 360 with the trees all moving continuously in the same direction under the light bulb Sun. 2) THE SUN MUST CHANGE SPEED VERY SIGNIFICANTLY ACROSS THE SKY ABOVE THE MOUNTAINS OR HORIZON IN TIME LAPSE VIDEO ON A BALL EARTH. But it does not. Consistent with a Flat Earth Model, the Sun moves at a constant 15 degrees per hour across the sky. On a ball Earth, recording a time lapse of the Arctic (North) midnight Sun from a position near, but above, the Arctic Circle, starting the recording when your position in the 360 rotation of the ball, where you are standing on a spot that is farthest to the right of the Sun, during the first 2-3 hours of recording, the Sun would appear ALMOST STATIONARY in the sky relative to the mountains or horizon, then after 6 hours, the Sun would appear to be moving 15 deg per hour above the mountains or horizon. Stationary to 15 deg per hour is a HUGE contrasting observed speed change of the Sun's aparrent movement due to the ball Spinning. What we actually record in these times lapse videos is a constant speed of 15 deg per hour, consistent with a Flat Earth model. You can verify this 100% proof that Earth is not a spinning ball by testing with a physical model, or a computer simulation, or even a mental visualization if you are able to carefully model in 3D in your mind.

[@OGMeatball]

Fake because the sun has cartoon sun rays that never change 😂💀 I feel bad for adults who believe these videos are real

[@josevasjung9322]

beautiful teletubbies's sun

[@albiuchiha7045]

am not a flat earther but why is the sun rays don't change they looks like fixed?

[@shegocrazy]

Because the camera is pointed at the sun it uses a small aperture to stop the image being frosted out. The smaller aperture you use the more sun rays you'll see. Because the camera is following the sun the rays don't change shape.

[@luvpamelanewton]

You are right. I see it. The rays are super imposed. Small clouds do not affect it when they pass in front. They should. The bright dot for a sun is added too. Color of sun and rays are super imposed and stay the same the whole time and is not realistic.

[@ME-ru4hv]

@@luvpamelanewton The video is just creepy looking.. and the second camera apparently didnt need some aperture shrinkage 🤣🤔

[@elbouhdidizakaria5250]

Cuz it fake dude

[@LordArioh]

why would sun rays change? Most of the flaring depends on optics, and direct sun photography is like looking at the sun through binoculars, so the guy uses small aperture and fast shutter speed to not to burn hole in a sensor of a camera. You can try that stuff at home with your phone or whatever. you'll get same results.

[@tdl4101]

I am just curious as to why you would not use a stationary camera focused on a flag or some similar item and watch the shadow of the object go 360 degrees rather than panning the camera 360 degrees? Seems like that would be solid proof of 24 hour sun

[@richardtengdui5141]

Tom umm you idots will just say "someone is holding a light source and walking around the pole". Cant argue with peope who think that way

[@0LoneTech]

It's not about proof, and the sort of people who'd demand such a thing deny evidence either way (both "fake sun" and "can't see the sun the whole video"). A panoramic shot is more scenic. Videos as you suggest are around too, of course.

[@HellllÏôn]

@@0LoneTech Could you provide a link to one? All the videos I have seen are not continuously recorded for the whole day. Thanks

[@0LoneTech]

@@HellllÏôn kzbin.info/www/bejne/b5upZGdvor1lotk

[@lukeprice3276]

Flat earthers are the most idiotic people on the globe

[@fromnorway643]

I tried to find the latitude based on how much the Sun's elevation changed during the day, as that will equal the distance from the pole multiplied by 2. After having estimated that the frame is 68° wide and using that as a reference, I found that the Sun's elevation changed by slightly less than 24°, indicating a latitude slightly south of 90 - (24/2) = 78° S. According to the Wiki-article, the latitude of the Scott base is 77° 51' S, so I missed by less than half a degree. Interesting what amateurs can figure out based on just a video if their brains don't suffer from hypoxia by being at the top of Mt. Stupid, isn't it? timnovate.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/dunning-kruger.jpg

[@antzkiwi]

Awesome!

[@cahkene5340]

@@antzkiwi , are you still in Scott base?

[@antzkiwi]

@@cahkene5340 No, back in New Zealand right now.

[@robertgraybeard3750]

upvote for "mount stupid" L O L

[@LarsPehrsson]

If you don't believe this video, then try to explain this. Daylight at tree southern cities december 22 2017: Dunedin, New Zealand: 2.51 dark night. 15.44 daylight. Ushuaia, Argentina: 0.00 dark night. 17.19 daylight. Cape Town, South Africa: 6.05 dark night. 14.25 daylight. (the remaining hours is twilight) Even with a magic shape shifting lampshade around the sun, it is impossible to have nearly 18 hours of daylight in three different directions on the "outer ring" on a flat earth.

[@hongry-life]

I have zero dark night in Europe at 50 degrees latitude as well in the summer half year. It's only twilight in the night for months then, not dark.

[@HonestSaxSound-unEdited-]

Lars Pehrsson it's not impossible if you have a dome reflecting light.

[@HonestSaxSound-unEdited-]

BlueDiamond Might of God?!... Stop the sun over Gabaon, in accordance to the Bibel, THIS IS MIGHT!, and is not possible in a rotation globeearth, neither is possible that "all eyes will be see Him (the Lord), like the stormlight that shows from orient to occident"... its only possible in a flat earth. Water "surfaces" keep ever leveled without drop, bulge or curvature. Sory for my English. Saludos de Argentina. Blessing.

[@Rschaltegger]

Yeah and Atlas Holds the world up...beat a Titan! puny Jahawe...all he can do is stop a sun...ATLAS HOLDS THE WORLD up. Give me proof that Atlas isent holding the world up Christian...

[@DavidZimbeck]

Those observations are possible on a flat earth. The suns light can travel through a density gradient such as a lens which would cause advanced sunrise and delayed sunset the further you go south. Just varying amounts of atmospheric magnification and lensing and refraction. Various types of lenses can do this, aka a dome or atmospheric gradient. Advanced sunrise and delayed sunset are already a KNOWN phenomenon in both models.

[@b-1sauce525]

Is it normal for all the sun flares to stay the same length and everything for the entire video?

[@tnwhiskey68]

Nope!

[@jamaldeep13]

Yes. They're _lens_ flares. They occur inside the lens.

[@b-1sauce525]

@@jamaldeep13 I’m asking because I’m genuinely curious I’m not “gotcha”-ing chill Can you link or something to another example where the flares off the light emitting object stay exactly the same length as it moves up and down on the perspective of the camera? If so I digress I’m just verifying the validity of this footage lol. I’ve already seen 2 faked videos of the sun in Antarctica so I’m RIGHTLY skeptical.

[@jamaldeep13]

@@b-1sauce525 The camera specs are in the description of this video for you to cross-examine with the resulting footage.

[@shmooveyea]

Camera specs in video, take your camera, use the same settings, film the sun wherever you are.

[@aparker676]

Can someone tell me how the watch and the background can both be in focus, the watch is very close, I dont know any lens that could focus that huge focal length

[@aparker676]

+A Parker Judging from the last frame thats impossible, either the watch is in foucs with a blurred background or vice versa

[@richardross1166]

+A Parker a very small aperture setting, in this case f22, this gives most cameras their greatest depth of field for focal length

[@haywoodjablomy1361]

*"I dont know any lens that could focus that huge focal length"* Then you don't really "know" any lenses. Since the lens is pointed directly at the *friggin' Sun*, even with filtration the aperture, by necessity, would have to be at it's most acute setting. (i.e.~Infinity) Therefore, depth of field would be maximized.

[@LordArioh]

@@haywoodjablomy1361 even my 85 f1.2 can do that))

[@haywoodjablomy1361]

@@LordArioh Hell, most modern point&shoots can do it! Parker needs to ditch his old Brownie box camera and get with the times.

[@Requiem4aDr3Am]

Cool video. Should do your next one showing different compasses down there and at the magnetic pole.

[@rabdownunder6775]

+Requiem4aDr3Am Might get a bit wet at the South Magnetic Pole. It's actually a bit north of the Antarctic Circle, and south of South Australia.

[@Requiem4aDr3Am]

Rab Downunder heh yes indeed I remember from my cruise there.

[@deathblosomrules]

+Rab Downunder No, it is south of the circle. That is why the sun is up for 24 hours.

[@scottyboy2400]

I would like to purchase some of the camera equipment and batteries that they used in -9c temps. Also need to know how long did the battery powering the camera last before they had to stop recording and change the battery?

[@antzkiwi]

Watch my other video about filming in the cold. This camera was run off solar power with a 12v lead-acid battery and a voltage converter to keep it going, as seen in the final shot.

[@scottyboy2400]

Thanks. How do u keep ice accumulation from happening?

[@antzkiwi]

@@scottyboy2400 generally not a problem, very low humidity, all the moisture in the air is already frozen most of the time this far south as it rarely gets above freezing. When it is needed I just use a dew strap USB lens heater.

they ask for a video, they receive one in 4K, they still dont believe hahahahaha.

[@swansyboy8512]

"it's CGI and poorly edited" does it _look_ poorly edited, Karen? We've got so many people saying it's correct, but I mean, they're all lying, right?

[@earaheart9527]

Fake sun. Lmao

[@Joey-wq7iw]

They’ve flown over the sun now, you can see that in video with your own eyes. There’s not even a question anymore about the shape of the earth, 100% flat

[@ADANTHEGIANT]

Lolololololol lol lol hella fake hahahaha

[@boosomentity]

first rule for sussing out any magic trick is to ask two questions:- -the first is what do you actually see -the second is what do you not see

[@rogerbarnett8412]

Your point? Nothing magic about this.....

[@heydude7568]

@@rogerbarnett8412 except its video editing fraud and anthony and others just like him 'stationed' (smh🤮) in antarctica are adept at fooling the masses with their sunlight games

[@MissMessengerPigeon]

Could you do this at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station?

[@antzkiwi]

If I get back there I, intend to. I did get a circular fisheye shot last time I was at the Pole, which I will be publishing as part of a series I am working on on over the next year.

[@bhaggen]

+Anthony Powell .....Nice work! May I suggest including a compass next time? Is there anything of note AT 90° South?

[@deathblosomrules]

+bhaggen Look here, the fifth picture down shows a GPS receiver at 90 degrees. ksblog.wordpress.com/page/2/

[@bhaggen]

+deathblosomrules .....How cool (or cold) is THAT!? And the Sun's out. Any signs of curvature? LOL Thanks for sharing.

[@ziparis]

@@antzkiwi This is CGI. Those sun rays are constructed too evenly. I've NEVER seen that replicated in unedited photography.

[@yuriyshevchuk1933]

Strange, it seems the video speeds up just past "West" tag to fit into 2:07 minutes clip; though, the time between "West" and "South" tags increases despite that, and did you notice clouds sort of pop up out of nowhere into clear sky right that second, at about 1:05 minutes? The minutes and the seconds arrows on that watch move simultaneously, must require service.

[@0LoneTech]

So what you're saying is you don't understand the concept of a time lapse video?

[@batatahigh382]

@@0LoneTech hshaushahsuahs, let him be

[@tkolkebeck]

@flow_state_chocolate explain how it is fake--otherwise keep the comment to yourself

[@kenlogsdon7095]

Outstanding! Awe Inspiring! Thank you!!

[@ethangriffin3935]

That is just a beautiful sight. *kicks back and grabs some popcorn*

[@ZombieMcBuster]

This comment section is so fun, I love seeing the different stages of people who took it upon themselves to try to inform some of the flat earthers. It's always a flat earther making some outlandish claim, someone disproves it and then the flat earther vanishes not knowing how to hold themselves up in an argument brought about by delusion and faux-paranoia.

[@Joey-wq7iw]

Pilots flew over the sun, there is now no question about the shape of the earth. The globe is completely debunked after that.

[@hongry-life]

I never get such a exact and non-changing star rays pattern on my sun photos over many hours of time. Is it a special filter or lens that you use?

[@swansyboy8512]

the lens turns at the exact same speed as the Earth compared to the Sun. Light from the Sun appears to follow the same path throughout the video, Which I believe causes the rays to have an almost equal pattern throughout the video. If you say this is fake, prove it. Show experiments and mathematical evidence which would make this impossible. EDIT: I feel like I jumped into this wayyy too quickly 2 years ago, as in reality I know nothing about lens glare and why it happens. What I do know is that proving a video fake or real does not prove the Earth is flat or round. In fact, the latter should be proven first, and from that we can conclude whether a video is (possibly) real, or factually fake.

[@ziparis]

@@swansyboy8512 Totally CGI - the words on on layers BEHIND the mountains, and yea, the sun rays are too perfect.

[@ziparis]

yea... this is CGI - sun's rays are too perfect and unwavering. No way that happens in real life photography. Also, the words are BEHIND the mountains - CGI.

[@swansyboy8512]

@@ziparis Note: I editted my comment from 2 years ago. I see I wanted to "prove" the Earth is round a bit too hastily, and what I said was definitely not a good explanation, as I didn't actually know the cause of lens flare back then, as mentioned in the edit. As for your comment(s): This video could indeed be CGI, but I'd like more information on lens glares before I'd make a claim. However, I have a remark: The words being behind the mountains could still be an edit. I believe it isn't too hard to put words seemingly behind something these days, so I'm fairly certain that on its own shouldn't be enough evidence for this video being CGI entirely.

[@ziparis]

@@swansyboy8512 I've been a photographer for decades. I've NEVER seen sun rays that uniform - EVER.

When's the part with the 24 hour sun?

[@brainzpvz2592]

About half way through the video.

[@patrickroy462]

Anthony, we are making a documentary debunking the flat earth. Is there a way to get a hold of you to see if we can use this clip?

[@antzkiwi]

via antarcticimagesdotcom

[@patrickroy462]

​@@earth.is.a.plane. I'm quiet because I am investing my time finishing our documentary. I find it sad that you call Anthony's work faked without any evidence (other than it doesn't match your worldview -- pun intended), and when he offers to pay for anyone who believes in the flat earth to test it out for themselves by actually going to the South Pole... and no one takes him up on it?????!!!! I know all your arguments must seem very convincing to you, but when I see that no one from the flat earth side will even take up Anthony's challenge, to me it kinda invalidates everything else that you say. It communicates that you don't really believe it enough yourself to do anything about it. It kinda becomes a bunch of meaningless chatter. By the way, I need to put my actions behind my worldview, as well. And we have. For our documentary, we have done several experiments in which I have clearly seen the curvature of the earth with my own eyes. Anyway, until a flat earther puts their actions behind their belief, and goes down to the Antractic, this will be my final post here for now, because I have a documentary to make!

[@increasement]

Patrick Roy you can’t see the curve you fucking CANT. Even Neil Degrasse Tyson will tell you you CANNOT SEE THE CURVE UNTIL OVER 120,000’ ALTITUDE. Valiant effort though, I’m sure your buddies love it.

[@Meatisfood]

@@increasement So you believe NDT?

[@AfrikanAdventures]

plane earth query it must be so painful to be in your shoes. When your idea is destroyed, you resorted at calling names. That proves a total lack of intelligence, and combined with FE fantasy, is a recipe for disaster

[@tonychristineandvinny786]

That sun looks really Jesuit

[@hansnielsen4165]

Anthony Powell: Thank you for this magnificent video. However: Is there a possibility to repeat this timelaps under even better weather conditions, now you have the equipment for it? All the flat'ers I have shown your video, has a huge problem understanding the white fluffy things that makes the sun magically disappear. So they all whine: "Nothing but another NASA hoax". Also, "this video is definitely made in Alaska", is another common claim.

[@antzkiwi]

Does not matter how many of these shots I post, they will still call them fake. None of them are willing to take up my challenge in the video description to put their money where their mouths are and go there themselves though.

[@hansnielsen4165]

I fully agree with you Anthony Powell, and my request was meant as a joke. Thx again for sharing your video. The FE community has recently worked on their model, and now accepts arctic midnight sun, so they can "debunk" videos like yours taken "down-under". "Easy to see, it is made in Alaska".... I have even heard a flat'er claim, "at 3:57 or something, you can see the NASA sunlight simulator takes over"! However I doubt we have heard it all. The FE community is very entertaining, except for the fact, they are indoctrinating their own kids, with this kind of nonsense.

[@antzkiwi]

@Off Grid Gringo You can book a trip to this exact location here: www.heritage-expeditions.com/destinations/antarctica-travel/ross-sea-antarctica-cruise/

[@TarekAzad]

Wow! Mind-blowing!!!

[@julzyboy8960]

Does anyone know what music that is at 0:53? It sounds awesome!

[@antzkiwi]

It is an original piece compsed for my movie Antarctica: A Year On Ice. The soundtrack is available on iTunes etc.

[@DravenWolfe]

I don't know who professor's stick is, I came because of professor dan Explains. And man, That must really be a sight to see in real life. The sun just rotating around.

[@timothymorrisii7165]

What an incredible and beautiful sight. 😍, I hope that one day I can witness this for myself. It's awe inspiring, and much like seeing the moon through a telescope, seeing with your own eyes must be exponentially more so.

[@alainncaileag5692]

From 0:53 - 1:55, each of the 14 streaks of the sun rays remain in its exact same individual shape and length. This is not reality. Shady editing. The amount of praise this video has affirms the quote; “It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they’ve been fooled.“

[@richardross1166]

I literally just explained this to you in another comment thread. Are you still convinced that you're *not* a troll?

[@alainncaileag5692]

In another thread a day ago you already expressed your recognition for me posting several comments describing mostly the same thing in the same time period, and *only now you decide to arrive at a different comment of mine* and pretend you only just saw it. Like i said to you before, i’m not gullible enough to heed into ridiculous justifications to deceptive videos like this one nor to trust people like yourself. I don’t revere you enough that I will pretend to heed with your explanation just so you will stop labelling me to be a troll. That psychological tactic of yours is not working on me.

[@richardross1166]

@@alainncaileag5692, I told you the truth with ways that you could check it's veracity for yourself if you had trust issues. Anyway, there are dozens of videos of the 24 hour sunlight from Antarctica, it's not like you're denying the fact that it exists are you? .

[@rustyshadow7]

The sun appears to move counterclockwise opposite of how it appears to move in the Arctic. So glad that you posted the watch in front of the camera, it clearly shows that you are not using mirror-imaging.

[@NZBigfoot]

No real 'appears' about it, thats because down here in the southern hemisphere thats the direction it rotates. Spin a ball and look at it from above, then from bellow both sides appear to go in opposite directions to the others despite spinning the same direction as a whole, its also why the night sky 'down' here rotates the opposite.

[@SleepParty30]

That watch looks fake as fuck. Most 24 hr antarctica videos in daylight are edited, some are even looped. Pretty interesting things they are hiding to the south.

[@Mayan_88694]

Because the earth is a rotating sphere

[@Mayan_88694]

Because the earth is a rotating sphere

[@rustyshadow7]

@@NZBigfoot Of course

[@Ocrilat]

So...we see the Scott base, but Ennio Morricone music doesn't automatically play? I thought the Antarctic winds just sounded like that. Weird.

[@discusshub2438]

How does one acquire work at research bases in Antarctica. Is there specific qualifications you need or something?

[@discusshub2438]

Richard Bottomley USA

[@Zakleo888]

The sunrays are exactly the same after 24hours? :) Compare 0:51 with 1:51 .... hmmm that is a BUST!

[@IvanSensei88]

So? Why should they be any different?

[@Zakleo888]

If you would try to answer this question yourself, what would you say?

[@IvanSensei88]

@@Zakleo888 I'd say there's no reason for them to be different... them being exactly the same is something one should expect - unless the clouds got in the way, which they didn't. So why having sunrays look exactly the same after being in a relatively same position is a bust is beyond me.

[@Zakleo888]

IvanSensei88 Search for ”Faked CGI sun in Antartica”, The answer is in that video.

[@IvanSensei88]

@@Zakleo888 And you actually believe that? I've seen the video and read the description... let me quote: _"Throughout the time the image is shown the quantity, length, width and intensity of the rays _*_do not change at all."_* The intensity of the rays do not change? Then what about 1:11? What about 1:22? What about 1:48? Not a very convincing answer. Actually, it smells more like one of the average fe lies they like to spread.

[@gregr3995]

"Flat earthers are twats." -Nikolai Tesla

[@casper5314]

When did tesla talk about the shape of the earth?

[@jasonvoorhees8545]

casper lol

[@sholva6809]

casper5314 Dude the flat earth cult has been around for centuries. So no surprise Tesla talked about their stupidity.

[@baconbits4123]

@@casper5314 Quite a bit... the phrase "terrestrial globe" shows up not infrequently in his writings.

[@Joey-wq7iw]

That awkward moment when you see that pilots have flown above the sun… 😂

[@per-bjarnemikalsen3996]

0:55 People are walking backwards. This is filmed in the north, and they rewind the video. In other similar videos, this is more visible than in this one though.

[@jamaldeep13]

People are literally teleporting around and you can't tell them apart, so no, you're full of crap

[@Bnslamb]

Tøft å skrive tull på nett når du driver egen firma.

[@per-bjarnemikalsen3996]

@@Bnslamb Det er ikke tull. Denne verden er et terrarium, et bygd, og stasjonært veksthus, ikke en planet fritt i et rom!

[@Bnslamb]

@@per-bjarnemikalsen3996 Ta en tur til Ushuaia 21. desember og se 17 timer og 20 minutter sol.

[@per-bjarnemikalsen3996]

@@Bnslamb 1. Er dette faktisk sant? og 2. Dette er fremdeles ikke 24 timer. Verdenshistorien er forøvrig fullstendig oppdiktet, ta eks: Citadel Hill (Fort George), liksom bygd på 17 og 1800 tallet, i Canada? Samme struktur som Goryōkaku i Japan. Og det i alle fall 5 slike øst i Canada, og mange på østdelen av USA, bare for å nevne noen få. Og hva er grunnen til at alle planetene går på ett og samme plan rundt sola? Det virker usannsynlig. Denne verden er et terrarium, et bygd veksthus som er i ro, ikke en planet fritt i et rom!

[@deathblosomrules]

+Anthony Powell Do you care to explain your camera setup and settings? Some think it is fake and a little explanation may help to put down the naysayers. Thanks.

[@myleenkuhner8211]

he is a Killer He will Not answer. (sorry for my english im from Germany)

[@deathblosomrules]

MYLEEN KÜHNER He did answer. The settings were F22, 1/125 th of a second exposure time and ISO 100. It was a Canon camera with a 16-35 lens. He is currently in Antarctica and planning to do an 8 day time lapse video.

[@deathblosomrules]

I have that in my Netflix queue. Have seen the first few minutes but looks great.

[@deathblosomrules]

Oh, and the legitimate time lapse you mention is by the same guy that made the Antarctica documentary.

[@deathblosomrules]

***** There is no CGI. I've been to Antarctica and this is what the sun looks like. It is weird, you can never figure out what time of day it is because it looks the same all the time. Oh, there is CGI in the text he puts on the screen. Not sure why it is cut off behind the mountain though, that is weird. He is not a fraud there IS 24 hour sun below 67 degrees south. I've witnessed this as well as many many others.

[@Eriksvensson4231]

What program did you use for the text and the sun? is the watch a layer?

[@antzkiwi]

Only layer is the text (with masks to allow the selective backgrounds to show through), the watch is on an arm in front of the camera as seen in the end clip. Done with Adobe.

[@ScienTheNoob]

Legit it seems like the only way to actually prove that the earth isnt flat is by doing a god damn live stream for 24 hours unfiltered with no commentary or nothing. Legit just a camera outside and done.

[@DaWrecka]

Nah, the flattards will still invent an excuse to dismiss it.

[@swansyboy8512]

"There are clearly editings, yuo can see the words 'north' and 'west' and such, therfor it is fake" Yea, nah, Karen. That's a small tiny edit so you can follow along with the camera and it's rotation. It just makes things a little more clear. "omg the sun is behind hte clouds most of the time!!! it's fake cuz you cant actually see if it goes down or not" You see those bright lines, Cindy? Those are called sunrays. And the lit, colored sky? It's enough to proof the sun's up there.

[@luvpamelanewton]

@@swansyboy8512 The rays stay present when the clouds pass in front when they should have adjusted. Slow it to .25 speed and you will see photo shop editing. I am disappointed to see it was done to this footage.

[@marklangstone]

@@luvpamelanewton I agree that glare looks fakes also this smacks of editing

[@LordArioh]

@@luvpamelanewton why should rays adjust? you have no fucking idea how optics work, do you? have you ever taken a timelapse of the sun yourself? the only editing as fa as I can see is words most likely done straight in Adobe Premiere Pro.

[@EdwinvandenAkker]

I showed this to a FE-er... he said: They must have filmed it in Greenland or something... Well... good job mirroring the image and get a reverse-watch... *Sigh*

[@hummruh8505]

😂

[@Hairysteed]

Take a flat earther to space on a capsule and he'll say that the window is just LCD. Take him out on a spacewalk and he'll say the same about his helmet's visor.

[@Joey-wq7iw]

After seeing a pilot fly over the sun, you guys can have the fake 24 hours of daylight video. Explain flying over the sun 😂😂😂

[@EvilNecroid]

looks awesome! i wanna go there

[@willlake5009]

Why are the words North and West partially behind the mountains?

[@swansyboy8512]

for a cool effect I guess?

[@HRMCGR2]

How do you determine what south is in Antarctica?

[@milo4866]

There's multiple Souths, like magnetic south isn't directly on the pole, so there is different souths!

[@kerosun4598]

Easy. It is the direction towards the south pole. The location of the camera isn't directly on the south pole, so South for the camera would be whatever direction the south pole is and is directly opposite the direction of the north pole. Your question implies that you believe all of Antartica is the south pole, which is obviously not the case.

[@jamaldeep13]

Towards the South Pole. Scott Base is a decent distance away from the South Pole.

[@sunjaeyoo7502]

the sun never sets because Scott base, Mc Murdo is below the antarctic circle.

[@SirSethery]

So many nutcases claiming it's fake. Our education system has truly failed us.

[@kenlogsdon7095]

Unfortunately no educational system is going to cure Carlin's Law or the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

[@sofrik9715]

what in the world are Carlin's Law or the Dunning-Kruger Effect.

[@joaquinarosavaz9879]

malucos são vocês, where's the sun between 17 oclock to 00 oclock? Liears and asholes

[@luvpamelanewton]

@@joaquinarosavaz9879 Watch the clock. He does a full 24 hrs starting and ending at North.

[@luvpamelanewton]

@@joaquinarosavaz9879 The small clouds did not affect the rays? Is that super imposed?

[@lenemarie899]

This seems strange. I live in the far north and i have NEVER EVER had a single day, in complete darkness. The shortest day of the year, the sun is here for 7 hours. Wonder how that's possible, if the sun is on the "bottom side"

[@jamaldeep13]

Well, that just means you live south of the Arctic Circle. Give us your latitude

[@jamaldeep13]

@Off Grid Gringo No celebrating until we know just HOW far north this person lives. If I had to guess by the "seven hours" comment, they only live somewhere around Denmark, Scotland, or Canada

[@jasonc7593]

I live in Indiana and on the 22nd of December we get just over 8.5hrs of daylight so I'm guessing with over 7hrs you're likely in northern Canada

[@jamaldeep13]

@@jasonc7593 This is like that time a Flat Earther asked me why New Zealand didn't get midnight suns like it was some kind of gotcha moment. Guy had even forgotten that the days got longer.

[@Meatisfood]

@@jamaldeep13 Shortest time sun is up for me is about 4.5h and I do not consider living "far north". 😎

[@raz3582]

Where is the sun at 2:06:80 i'd say ? lol

[@ivvygreen9265]

wow! it's my first time i see this...its amazing!! Thank you!

[@marksilla8276]

This is just beautiful.

[@RED-my9hl]

Flat earthers in a nutshell: "1 + 1 = 3. There's a hidden 1 because of the government"

[@JuanDuran-bu9nm]

You don't need to go to antarctica. Go to any country close to the equatorial line and confirm how the daily movement of the sun changes so little that days have the same duration throughout the year:)

[@ollymounara605]

That actually works on a flat earth. The sun moving away from the equator to the middle or to the outer ring, moving back over the equator.

[@JuanDuran-bu9nm]

@@ollymounara605 you didn't get my point. For countries close to the equatorial line, days have pretty much the same duration throughout the year. There is a difference of just few minutes between the winter and summer solstices. If the flat earth model worked then the sun would never move significantly away from the equator, but of course that doesn't work.

[@jeremyhyde2328]

The part you came here to see starts at 0:53. Why do people insist on putting super long intros in their videos?

[@graham68ktm24]

Awesome timelapse Anthony , approximately how many shots did it take to do 24 hours ?

[@antzkiwi]

graham68ktm at 1 minute intervals it is 1440 photos a day

[@graham68ktm24]

Anthony Powell thanks for reply , ive been thinking of doing a static TL of sun mid winter in Sydney !

[@TerraNova--]

@@antzkiwi Fantastic !😱 Can I use the video..? I want to show them the video. Bad flat earther...😭

[@holychildofgod3778]

This video disproves the flat earth model very elegantly, You did a wonderful work, Thank you for sharing it with us to learn from it. :)

[@chadamitecheckoutredpillpl2641]

no lmao it practically proves it when that sun looks that fake.

[@holychildofgod3778]

@@chadamitecheckoutredpillpl2641 It's sun flare on the camera lenses. Please use your reasoning abilities, that your Maker gave you.

[@chadamitecheckoutredpillpl2641]

​@@holychildofgod3778 but the second camera filming the first one didnt have that. The Bible mentions a nonmoving domestructure earth in 70 places. I am using my reasoning abilities, thats why I'm here God bless.

[@Qwerty-ly8qk]

@@chadamitecheckoutredpillpl2641 The Bible is largely a collection of human made stories from around the Middle East. No different from other mythologies, except for the fact that the canonised books were selected by a closed circle rather than the public. Once you dig into other mythologies and see the similarities in story telling, you will see that the Bible is no different.

[@chadamitecheckoutredpillpl2641]

@@Qwerty-ly8qk the Bible is the objective truth about the universe. I didnt read your comment.

[@martismartiis813]

damn, seeing the clouds forming is awesome

[@swansyboy8512]

It's so weird and surreal... They sometimes seem to disappear... Do you know how it works? I'd like to know honestly.

[@jinhong5152]

soundtrack please!

[@antzkiwi]

Music is from the soundtrack of my film Antarctica: A Year On Ice by Plan 9. Soundtrack available on iTunes Amazon etc.

[@jinhong5152]

Anthony Powell Thanks! Awesome!

[@swansyboy8512]

@@jinhong5152 is that Saitama I see?

[@jinhong5152]

yes indeed, @@swansyboy8512, yes indeed

[@swansyboy8512]

@@jinhong5152 Souka.

[@SwaaallaGE]

So, apparently witsit says the stitched the start to the end. But the cloud formations dont match

[@kevinsamuelbo]

Wrong Video Mate

[@kevinsamuelbo]

Here the Problem lies with the way too consistent rays of the sun, when overexposing them, they dont shrink. the sun is edited in

[@kevinsamuelbo]

Also the watch Glitches

[@SwaaallaGE]

@@kevinsamuelbo which video is it

[@jamaldeep13]

​@@SwaaallaGE This one kzbin.info/www/bejne/j4LPo2Zsa8qYotU Still makes it abundantly clear that the Sun never set during that wholes sequence.

[@mrduckface3971]

song in the vid pls?

[@lelien-i4o]

what 's missing in this video is a compass next to the watch...

[@SwartieLoveJoy]

Agreed! Btw.. I have settled the FE vs Globe issue one and for all with 100% verifiable proof that you don't even need to leave your living room to verify. Here is the 100% proof Earth is not a spinning ball: 1) THERE IS NO ZIG-ZAG OF THE SUN WHEN RECORDING A 24 HR TIME LAPSE VIDEO OF THE 24 HR ARCTIC SUN (NORTH OF THE ARCTIC CIRCLE) On a spinning ball Earth, there MUST BE a zig-zag of the Sun above the mountain ranges or horizon. Instead, a 360 circling of the Sun is recorded. Think about this very carefully, and you can even test it with a model by placing a tiny camera on a huge beach ball or weather balloon and put model trees everywhere on top of it, making sure the camera is not on the North Pole axis, but is near, but above, the Arctic Circle. Keep the trees and Sun (light bulb across the room) in the camera's view while recording a full 360 revolution of the ball, and you will record a zig-zag Sun that moves above the trees from left to right, then right to left. It is impossible to record the light bulb making a 360 with the trees all moving continuously in the same direction under the light bulb Sun. 2) THE SUN MUST CHANGE SPEED VERY SIGNIFICANTLY ACROSS THE SKY ABOVE THE MOUNTAINS OR HORIZON IN TIME LAPSE VIDEO ON A BALL EARTH. But it does not. Consistent with a Flat Earth Model, the Sun moves at a constant 15 degrees per hour across the sky. On a ball Earth, recording a time lapse of the Arctic (North) midnight Sun from a position near, but above, the Arctic Circle, starting the recording when your position in the 360 rotation of the ball, where you are standing on a spot that is farthest to the right of the Sun, during the first 2-3 hours of recording, the Sun would appear ALMOST STATIONARY in the sky relative to the mountains or horizon, then after 6 hours, the Sun would appear to be moving 15 deg per hour above the mountains or horizon. Stationary to 15 deg per hour is a HUGE contrasting observed speed change of the Sun's aparrent movement due to the ball Spinning. What we actually record in these times lapse videos is a constant speed of 15 deg per hour, consistent with a Flat Earth model. You can verify this 100% proof that Earth is not a spinning ball by testing with a physical model, or a computer simulation, or even a mental visualization if you are able to carefully model in 3D in your mind.

[@barryschultz4947]

the compass always points north so if there was a south pole when you go below the equator it would point south but it doesnt because there is no south pole!!! Why is that so hard???? Why??? Its so simple it proves they are lying!

[@paparalph3273]

@@barryschultz4947 What on God's earth are you talking about? "there is no south pole" ????

[@paparalph3273]

And what would a compass prove or disprove ?

[@ALofiLife]

@@barryschultz4947so true amen 🙏

[@Nicolos117]

There is no way that you expect me to believe this is real

[@jamaldeep13]

Why not?

[@Nicolos117]

Lmao, no real footage would half that many edits

[@jamaldeep13]

@@Nicolos117 The only edits in the tracking shot (the important part of the video) were the cardinal directions, dude

[@Nicolos117]

@@jamaldeep13 ignore the text on the ice and constant manipulation

[@jamaldeep13]

@@Nicolos117 Okay Midnight sun still happens up there in Antarctica

[@joseftti]

I've been trying to keep an open mind about all this, but this does look strange.

[@jimmythejohn647]

Hey Yoseff. It has been 3 years. Still a skeptic?

[@tharii314]

1:15 Wait, what??

[@politokratia9714]

@1:48 A helicopter appears out of nowhere right side of the watch. 12:35 pm watch time and disappears 12:42 without being capture in any other frame before or after flying.. Tricky stuff @1:51 , (watch time 13:50) same location the magic helicopter appears again and on @1:53 watch(2:37) he flies away and for the first time we have a flying image of the helicopter watch-2:38.

[@IvanSensei88]

So a helicopter landing and taking off is magic?

[@fehmidonmez7810]

Yes thats edited.

[@IvanSensei88]

@@fehmidonmez7810 A helicopter taking off and landing is edited. What?

[@fehmidonmez7810]

@@IvanSensei88 That whole video edited. You will never get the same sun rays at the bottom of a ball while you're 24.5 degree tilted. Obvious fake.

[@IvanSensei88]

@@fehmidonmez7810 Yeah, can't you read video descriptions? Read and see how the video was actually made. Also that logic is a total failure. A complete brainfart. There's no reason for it to change as it never gets close enough to the horizon for it to dissipate.

[@FabioPedreiraMM]

I have only one thing to say: Min. 1:06. Play from this point in slow motion and anyone can see clouds apearing from nothing in the sky, it´s note real. Clouds come and go, they don´t appear or desappear suddenly, you did a good edition to catch dummies. Congrats.

[@Jake-sw3ss]

Ummm, yes, clouds DO form out of invisible vapor in the sky ALL the time.

[@hansnielsen4165]

Basic physics isn't exactly your strong side Fabio. However arrogance obviously is! Water vapor condensing, when it hits cool air. Why is this so hard to understand dummy?

[@1669Python]

Very very lucky to have gone down there. No place like it.

[@Momonga-s7o]

"I can't explain this, thus it's fake" -flatearther exposing his intelectual dissonance/dishonesty.

[@deathblosomrules]

Any photographer will tell you that the way the sun looks is due to a very small f-stop, which can give a large focal plane, which means the mountains can be in focus as well as the clock. There is some post processing. Want to explain Anthony? I know those east and west text aren't real so there had to be some layering. What camera and lens?

[@joeblack4254]

+deathblosomrules I noticed - no reply from Anthony

[@deathblosomrules]

+Joe Black I'll send a messagedirectly and see what he says.

[@deathblosomrules]

+Joe Black I just watched it again. The way the sun moves, going up and down is consistent with what I would expect for some time after the September equinox, meaning it is higher in the sky when facing north and lowest when facing south. When I was there that sun was just blaring at you, bright as hell all the time. Didn't help that everything is white to help reflect the light. Not sure he will reply but will try to contact someway.

[@deathblosomrules]

He said it was F22, and I asked for more details. He is currently in Antarctica and is doing a similar time lapse video for 8 straight days. Let's see what he presents.

[@deathblosomrules]

More info: Canon Rebel XSi, 16-35L @ 16mm, f22, 1/100, ISO100. External shot of rig at end of video shot with gopro. scontent-syd1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/.../1498906... Also, he says the spots are very fine ice particles. You think they have ice particles in Antarctica? :)

[@IvoPavlik]

For those who weren't able to read the video description for some reason and are wondering why the sun has the weird and seemingly fixed rays around itself: The video was shot on a fixed and pretty high aperture f22 which causes this kind of strong flaring due to light diffraction on the aperture blades. It's a known optical defect that photographers have to fight when looking for the right exposition. For us time lapsers, however, the mechanical aperture can pose even more headache, because it tends not to land in the exactly the same position and therefore causes slight flickering. You cannot see it here because either f22 is the upper limit of this particular lens and lands precisely or because it was fixed during the whole shoot to avoid flicker (some cameras/lenses can do that).

[@mattanubis3992]

Damn, I got the chills watching this! This is amazing! Nice job!

[@travissherwood422]

Nice cloud formations.....

[@hongry-life]

I see no sun in the east part

[@tristanlj3409]

@@hongry-life haha. It's not the sun, it's the fact that it is still day. It's the sun had set, not a lot of time would go by before it would get dark

[@hongry-life]

@@tristanlj3409 I do not believe that the sun 'sets', I do believe that it gets oout of my sight and vanishes in the vanishing point of my horizon (horizon = eye sight limit, circle of view rim).

[@tristanlj3409]

@@hongry-life agreed, but wouldn't you say that a stipulation for the sky to be lit up, is that the sun hasn't set? That being the same as the sun still being up, and therefore it cannot be used as a singular argument against the 24 hour sun. Of course I don't know if that is what you implied.

[@1080stopthedrop]

Amazing!

[@dmeemd7787]

Awesome video! Thanks for putting this together!

[@longtracker89]

great job! There are too few videos of the southern hemisphere ( north polar circle ) . For FE its not enough ! You have a video of the video that make a video of a video ...

[@BreeZieDoesiT]

Hi Anthony. I was wondering, once the sun went due west and all those clouds came for a period of 15 seconds, why not scrap it and wait for another day?. Is the forecast terrible over there in terms of getting a clear 24 hour cycle?. Its a good video but still people think its fake due to the suns positioning after the clouds. Im not one of them but was just curious if its that hard to get a clear and full 24hour shot of it in frame. Cheers

[@antzkiwi]

Yes, it is quite hard to get a full 24hour period with no clouds. This year I did get one in front of Scott Base at mid-summer, it can be seen on my Facebook page.

[@Bnslamb]

@@antzkiwi I would like to see your video here on your KZbin account. I have no Facebook account.

[@bsdiceman]

Why do people think its fake?

[@mitcHELLOworld]

@@bsdiceman because they’re flat earthers, and their cognitive dissonance will cause them to fight tooth and nail claiming anything that doesn’t fit in their ridiculous worldview is faked.

[@DroogVoom]

Brilliant work! I would hate to think of all the technical issues that had to be overcome in a shoot like this.Moreover given what scientists get paid none of them stole your watch! Congratulations and thanks for sharing a stunningly beautiful video.

[@donking1000]

Earth is not flat! Why can't these flat earth people get it?

[@Dolphster69]

prove it

[@deathblosomrules]

The problem with 24 hour live footage is size. The size of the earth is so large that even when you have a lot of pixels, each pixel is several miles. I believe I calculated the pixel size to be about 20 miles per pixel for the DSCOVR spacecraft. So a storm moving 20 mph would move 1 pixel in an hour. So why do you want streaming live coverage? That would be like watching paint dry. Taking still images every hour or maybe 20 minutes, is more than good enough to track any storm or see any change in the weather patterns on earth.

[@laserfloyd]

It makes you wonder doesn't it?

[@eddietorres1313]

Because they're hard-headed and refuse to listen to reason... just don't listen to them.

[@christophercombs7561]

UnsilentGamer i just going keep to mydiscovery that *ALL* flat earther fail at basic geometry

[@lovetocook9078]

Beautiful video. Thank you for sharing

[@CheesieGamer]

If the FE model was right.... it means Antartica gets regular days then right? sun just passes by.... spins across the plate... then it's there again.... no 6 months dark/light like in northpole?

[@antzkiwi]

Yes, that is why the flat earthers hate this video, as it completely debunks their ideas. Many thousands of tourists to Antarctica see this for themselves every year, curiously none of them have asked for a travel reimbursement as I have offered in the video description.

[@jordanblake574]

Is there people that can verify Scott base gets 24hr sun? It does not work on a flat earth model Can't really trust a video as this can be edited

[@S7evin13]

@@jordanblake574 but you would trust strangers?

[@0LoneTech]

@@jordanblake574 "It does not work on a flat earth model" - well there's your problem. Such a model disagrees with reality. However, your belief such a model has any significance is based on your next statement: "Can't really trust". That isn't on its surface an issue; skepticism has its place. The problem is, you do trust - specifically the wrong things. You put so much trust in your conceptual model that you're ignoring even your own senses, let alone any explanations, and wouldn't perform any of the basic tests that have been recommended.

[@bannorbannorinc3683]

Definitely not fake. The ray effect is called a sunstar and it's from using a small aperture. And yes, it can appear if the sun is behind thin clouds. Notice they go away behind thick ones. Some people really need to research simple photographic concepts. This video is totally authentic. By the way, there are plenty of 24 hour videos of the antarctic sun.

[@nijaethompson7647]

I thought it was called the starburst effect.

[@awakeasleep1494]

We should see many more videos like this one ! Right? Lets see more!

[@henrylinks1087]

i liked the suggestion of filming a stationary object, like a flagpole, and watch the shadow make a full 360 rotation. this footage makes less sense the more i watch it. much love

[@florianhug9801]

all this "its fake!!" comments.. its hillarious to read..

[@IvoPavlik]

Shocking and entertaining at the same time 🙂

[@wolverine3149]

Description says 4 months of constant sunlight. On a ball earth the opposite point should also get 4 months of constant sunlight. That's 2/3 of the year someone is getting sunlight all day long, that sound anything close to right? And how did that cheap little watch not freeze??

[@swansyboy8512]

This is possible because it does this: www.richhoffmanclass.com/images/chapter2/wintersunrays.jpg 4 months is 2/3 of a year, is that what you're saying? Really? There are 12 months in a year, right? And 4 months of constant day long sunlight: 4/12 = 1/4 If you want people to trust your claims, at least dont make stupid mistakes like this. This is a horrible, horribly dumb mistake to make.

[@SteveSteeleSoundSymphony]

Wolverine 314 Not all materials have a freezing point of 32 degrees Fahrenheit. How do you not know the answers to these questions? And yes, 4 months sounds perfectly right. You have seasons where you’re at? They change throughout the year? It’s warm, then six months later it’s cold? Yes? That’s how it works!

[@richardross1166]

@@UnDisclosedb0ss IQ...room temperature - celcius?

[@luvpamelanewton]

@@UnDisclosedb0ss Watch was added or superimposed to show the time on the computer through video editing.

[@shmooveyea]

Hey, 6 years on, wondering if you're embarrassed by this comment yet?

[@lori-annmacdonald5016]

What is the date the video was taken? It shows the month of December, but no day or year?

[@antzkiwi]

Dec 9th 2014

[@pauld7379]

Myself, and any number of my colleagues, have worked at US McMurdo Station and NZ Scott Base on Ross Island, Antarctica and have experienced the 24 hours sun first hand. The location of this time lapse is on the Ice shelf outside of Scott Base, which is often frozen over but occasionally, every few years, will break up and blow out to sea. This last summer season it broke up and blew out in a matter of hours. As the camera pans around you see the green buildings of Scott Base near center screen with just a glimpse of Mt Erebus to the far right and the volcanic plug of Castle Rock just next to that, then Observation Hill (AKA Ob Hill, also a volcanic plug) which then slopes down to the ice on McMurdo Sound which stretches to the distant Dry Valley's. Next there's the occassionally weather obscured mountains known as the Royal Society Range. Then Black Island, White Island and the stretch of ice to the east which almost seems endless until the green flag appears and then Mount Erebus appers again along with Castle Rock. If you disbelieve then get on a cruise to Antarctica and experience it for yourself.

[@richardross1166]

Paul D, this wasn't filmed from as far as the ice shelf, it's taken from the sea ice. At one point you can see the flags marking the Armatige road (or at least the Scott Base link to it). But yeah, this is totally what happens down there at that time if year. It's funny but a bit sad reading the comments from the delusional flat earth types.

[@simonsays2774]

Sure boy u did 😂

[@Joey-wq7iw]

No you didn’t. We have a video that’s old, of a pilot flying over the sun. And now drones can see that the sun is in our atmosphere. The globe is completely debunked, and the model can be discarded.

[@DishwasherPrime]

1. Send satellite to space 2. receive internet from satellite orbiting around earth 3. use internet to say space is fake and the earth is flat

[@AlphaRoom1]

no one receives internet via Satellites. Ever heard of Cables?

[@DaWrecka]

Satellite Internet is a thing. The latency is fucking awful - like 1000ms round trip - but it works for remote regions where cables aren't practical. Such as Antarctica! (disclaimer: I don't actually know how Antarctic bases get their Internet. It would just make sense for it to be satellite.)

[@swansyboy8512]

GPS is a better example. We got I believe 24 satellites up there that send signals (with their information and time of being sent) which are then recieved by a Global Positioning System (GPS) device, and uses 4 of those signals (3 satellites and one extra, for accuracy) to measure your exact position on the Earth. We use this a lot, but it's all fake, init?

[@jordanblake574]

@@swansyboy8512 yes all fake

[@MrGrompok]

Who in the hell disliked this video? Well it has a bit long intro but it's also in 4k...

[@unnameduser17]

Flat Earthers

[@softestcat]

Flat Earthers

[@swansyboy8512]

Flat Earthers. aka people who deny actual proof based on simple unusual things without actually proving it's nonexistant faults and impossibilities. better known as retards/flattards

[@thor97470]

Thank you for the video.

[@coolhawk2003]

How do they get the battery to last that long in a hig of -1?

[@antzkiwi]

External 12v lead-acid battery plus solar panels, and a voltage converter for the camera.

[@cristibaluta]

Anthony could you disable the comments? It is very depressing to know that are people considering this fake or even that the earth is flat.

[@Kazmomusic]

+Cristian Baluta It sucks that some people can't appreciate the beauty of our planet. I personally love this, especially the watch-touch. I would love to go to Antarctica and experience this some time!

[@Kazmomusic]

***** One side presented? Just like your disk? What don't you believe in this video? It's just like the Summer Solstice in the Arctic except the sun seems to be moving in the opposite direction, coinciding with a north and south pole on this beautiful planet we call Earth.

[@Kazmomusic]

+Mark Wilson Clearly this is just an observation; no fraud being committed here! You honestly can't wrap your head around the globe, can you? "At the one spot you were at along the circumferential ring surrounding the flat earth's land mass, how was it ALSO, AT THE SAME TIME providing light to the earth, northward, while circling your camera?" That's simply because it's not a circumferential ring surrounding the flat earth's land mass! It's a mass of land at the south pole! "In other words, we know now that the earth is a flat plane." No, you BELIEVE it's a flat plane, which it is not. His camera was located in one spot in Antarctica (Scott Base to be exact). "So how did the sun deviate from its circular route going around the plane, breaking the circular movement to HANG A LEFT TURN AT THE SPOT OF YOUR CAMERA, TO GO FURTHER SOUTH TO CIRCLE YOUR CAMERA 360 DEGREES?" It didn't deviate from anything! I'm starting to realize you're probably a true troll, here to fluster everyone and pass around your dis-info. It's just like the arctic, except we're spinning in the opposite direction relative to the sun in the antarctic. It's a globe, and you can't handle the truth.

[@Kazmomusic]

+Mark Wilson Irrefutable proofs...you make me laugh. There are none! THOSE are fairy tale ideas. At this point in your life you should know better, mind you I have no idea how old you are. Going by the Bugs Bunny avatar, I'm guessing at least 20. You really believe the earth is flat? You really believe this video is fraud? You really believe there are hundreds of millions of people in on some sort of crazy conspiracy cover-up? Please, grow up. Go on a couple vacations, hell, go to Antarctica during the Winter Solstice like Anthony! Then I hope you realize you've been thrown so much horse shit from Eric Dubay and all those other guys, and finally come to your senses.

[@Kazmomusic]

***** Too bad it's not you! Samuel was not a role model (quoting Garwood, 2007): "Following allegations of sexual misconduct he reinvented himself as an itinerant lecturer under the name Parallax." So he decided to become a self-proclaimed lecturer...alright. "He took a little time to learn his trade, running away from a lecture in Blackburn when he couldn't explain why the hulls of ships disappeared before their masts when sailing out to sea." (lol) "However, as he persisted in filling halls by charging sixpence a lecture his quick-wittedness and debating skills were honed so much that he could "counter every argument with ingenuity, wit and consummate skill"" So he was better at it than you guys! Also times have indeed changed since then, so it was much easier to persuade people back then! "In 1861 Rowbotham was married for a second time to the 16-year-old daughter of his laundress and settled in London, producing 14 children, of whom 4 survived." That's fucked up. Also, this BOOK was released after all of this. "This book, in which he lays out his world system, went through three editions, starting with a 16 PAGE PAMPHLET published in 1849, a second edition of 221 PAGES published in 1865, and the third edition of 1881 (which had inflated to 430 pages). You LIED about the dates of the editions! "One of Rowbotham's followers, John Hampden, a Christian polemicist, gained notoriety by engaging in raucous public debates with leading scientists of the day. A bet involving the prominent naturalist Alfred Russel Wallace in the famous Bedford Level experiment led to several lawsuits for fraud and libel and Hampden's imprisonment." Ouch. So you look up to this guy I see...goes to show how crazy you are.

[@Nilsy1975]

Professor Sticks sent me here 💁‍♂️

[@CaptFoster5]

Okay, so we have 24 hour sunlight from Oct to Feb at the south pole, and 24 hour sunlight from April to August at the north pole, not to mention solar/lunar eclipses ... can someone explain to me how flat Earthers can possibly exist to this day?

[@TheJelac]

This video is a fake. I am 100% sure. Words "NORTH" and "WEST" are behind environment, shadows are not real and do not follow the movement of the sun, flags have no shadow at all.

[@drmantistoboggan2870]

They are too stupid to understand evidence 😂

[@drmantistoboggan2870]

​@@TheJelac well as long as youre sure, it must be true then 😂

[@michaelbauers8800]

Willful ignorance is one answer.

[@zwarst]

The problem I see with this video is that the time piece is an analogue watch, will the future generations understand such antiquated means of time keeping? I appreciate you work thank you.

[@jacksonwhare805]

Cool vid Antz and Rach 👍👍

[@laneyboy1473]

TURN OFF THESE COMMENTS HOLY CRAP THEY'RE MISERABLE

[@antzkiwi]

Laney Boy, I don't like to censor people, even if they are complete idiots. For those claiming it is fake, put your money where your mouth is and read the last paragraph in the video description.

[@RonLarhz]

BlueDiamond We can never explain to flatards,they will never or dont want to get it. However,we can hope that those who are trying to figure out for themselves will see these concrete edvidence vs the flattards pseudoscience.

[@Joey-wq7iw]

We flew over the sun more on, there’s no question about earths shape anymore. Globe heads lost

[@D3Vi1SKi113R]

​@Joey-wq7iw You flew over the Sun... like right above it, did you take a picture or record it I would love to see what it looks like from up close

[@Joey-wq7iw]

@@D3Vi1SKi113R Pilots can fly higher than the sun and moon. Doesn’t mean they fly directly over it.

[@Joey-wq7iw]

Omg the sun in this video… You actually have to be drooling from the mouth to believe this is authentic. It looks like you drew that sun yourself 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@antzkiwi]

@Joey-wq7iw your critical skills seem somewhat lacking. Maybe you should take some camera lessons to understand what you are looking at. There are plenty of reputable schools available.

[@Joey-wq7iw]

@@antzkiwiWithout a fish eye lens, there is no globe. That is the fakest sun I’ve ever seen, I don’t know what you were trying to prove here.

[@antzkiwi]

@@Joey-wq7iw I'm not trying to prove anything, I'm just photographing my experiences. Don't care about FE.

[@Joey-wq7iw]

@@antzkiwi Let’s say this was hypothetically real, how are pilots flying over the sun? Both can’t be real

[@antzkiwi]

@@Joey-wq7iw as above, I don't care what weird stuff you believe, I'm just filming things I see. Also read the full video description.

[@pastor.ryanwatson]

Awesome video! Great videography. I don't know why so many think this is fake; maybe spend more time outside and less time playing video games.

[@ziparis]

It's CGI. The words are behind the mountains. Sun looks totally fake.

[@TMesser74]

Because this is either in the north or edited to appear 24 hour sun in the south. Thats why its fake.

[@bsdiceman]

@@TMesser74 it's fake? The earth is flat there can be no 24 hr sun in Antarctica and no rotation of the stars around a southerly axis in the sky.

[@mitcHELLOworld]

I can’t believe flat earthers actually still exist in 2022. I would love to see some IQ test results. Y’all are so dumb it actually makes me fear for the future of our species.

[@juliusdedekind]

Denying the existence of Antarctica is a sacred cow for flat-earthers.

[@GhostRaven1996]

Genuine question I have. Why is the label 'WEST' partially behind the mountain?

[@antzkiwi]

Me being artistic.

[@jeffdavis6657]

Summer is when it is the other way right? Do you have any film of that season?

[@adrianpaul8044]

Jeff Davis - This is summer - S hemisphere summer = Nov - Feb, Winter = May - July. Film of "other season would be winter 24h darkness.

[@jeffdavis6657]

Adrian Paul I think you misunderstood. I see the sun almost set as the day passed. I asking does any light show in your "winter"? Like a twilight pre-dawn or does it stay like midnight dark. How much of the moon comes? Do you get the same brightness, full moon, or is it always in a phase.

[@Jake-sw3ss]

It is completely dark but for the moon and stars. I used to live in Alaska and Iceland. Same in the North during winter.