Fujifilm X-T4 vs X-H1

This is the ultimate Fujifilm death match, with the X-H1 versus the X-T4. Which will survive? Just kidding, I’m comparing video AF for basic talking head type stuff. See how they compare.

[@tobysource]

What lens are you using in this? 18-55 kit? I'm impressed with the AF performance you got.

[@EDHBlvd]

This is likely the 35mm f/2. Possibly the 23mm f/2. Not the 18-55. I only use that lens when filming on the go, as dual IS is very impressive. For talking heads I like more subject separation, so I use primes.

[@FotosyMas.]

APSC is a hoax, you should dump Fuji and move to full frame.

[@EDHBlvd]

Medium Format is the new FF.

[@Murray.Sutherland]

@@EDHBlvd gfx100s is the shiz for Image Q. But apsc is still the shiz for carrying a bigish sensor on foot.

[@INTERNETDWARF]

The best camera is the one you enjoy using.

[@ALIENdrifter66]

99.99% of professional clients won't notice any difference, in fact, there's a lot of people using M4/3 without problems. Many pro sports cameras have been APS-C. As technology evolves full frame becomes less relevant, APS-C is lighter, cheaper, smaller, so unless you need huge prints (in which case you wouldn't go for full frame either) APS-C is a better technology for most situations. Full frame is just a trend or status thing, there's no rationality involved

[@MorningNapalm]

:DDDDDDDDDDDD @KeyAperture what cool-aid have you been drinking? Hoax? It is just a slightly smaller sensor, everything else is very similar. A far bigger difference is the colour rendering. Fuji's colours are awesome, Sony is sterile, Nikon has slightly dead skin tones and Canon is all boosted. If you really want great image quality, don't go FF, go GFX.