Full Nuclear War AI Simulation - Russia vs NATO vs China

[@daniel_redbeard]

At least I won’t have to pay taxes anymore.

[@hanbingliu1645]

😁😄😂

[@johnargumaniz9179]

The irs has contingency plans in place so they can co to use to collect currently due taxes in the event of a nationwide disaster such as nuclear war. Try again

[@sethfrimpong2547]

😂😂😂

[@Todd-w6u]

I’m not sure, they would have a Nuke Tax eventually

[@JuanMartinez-nz3oe]

LOL!!!

[@ziadshalabi5255]

Fact: The best place to be during a nuclear explosion is as close as possible. You'd vanish in an instant, well before your brain even processes what's happening.

[@FullJikama]

You are right, horrible and sad but true.

[@mattias92J]

Noone would win a nuclear war.. we would all be dead..

[@aaronkidd9450]

Your incorrect. You know nothing.

[@dannyoproductions1]

Yes… our leaders of today are idiots

[@CarlMartRod]

​@@aaronkidd9450 please enlight us then, provide an meaningful answer.

[@aaronkidd9450]

@CarlMartRod The effects of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Russians have invested heavily in civil defense,training civilian population. You can look at effects long term such as Cherynobyl.

[@CarlMartRod]

@@aaronkidd9450 sorry, but that's not the same scope. The context of the video and what @mattias92J said is about a "global nuclear war" which is a different beast. Sure, not 100% would be dead, but long term the % will be very high and humanity progress won't be the same for long time.

[@antonmeier5499]

Madness wins, and the mankind loses 🤑🤯

[@EraphaseContemplation]

Anyone thinking there is a winner in NUC warfare gets and "F - " in physics.

[@Castor1986x]

Will ever people understand theres no such thing like "winner?"

[@SHTshtira]

few will be

[@richardbrothers1174]

Someone saw the movie "THE ROAD" this is what our life will be like when WW3 ends, better to die in nuclear war than survive.

[@NadiaGreen-p6s]

The book was worse 🥺

[@MrAtomblue]

Words of a lazy coward 🙄

[@Alonzafrm_62]

Imma make a sandwich while the bombs falling

[@hemerhermenegild3261]

or maybe like fallout :p (serie)

[@RAM-wv1vr]

I agree. What's the point of living in this harsh aftermath?

[@hmmmahroof3602]

No human will persist. Human ego will persist even after total annihilation.

[@justadildeau]

Our ego will survive in the rise of the ai robots who will rule the radioactive wasteland

[@sp93210]

​@@justadildeau Robots have a better chance of survival than humans?

[@trinelarson6655]

It would be HELL on Earth

[@garry_potta]

If you didnt die from the initial explosions... You would spend whats left of your life praying to die. Thats if anyone survives at all..

[@dirkdiggler0372]

The simple answer is, Nobody wins. And the criminals in our own governments that led us there will never be punished.

[@petem68]

Oh, they WILL be punished. Who will they have to boss around and tax? They will have very lonely lives.

[@theallseeingkats6321]

Quick answer,nobody will win...💀

[@Roel922]

triggering yellowstone would create a devastating climate disaster alone on top of that from nuclear war in general. these two together would have same effect of an asteroid impact as which ended the dinosaurs.

[@lucvincentmetz8144]

It‘s impossible to trigger a super eruption with nukes though. The process that makes a volcano erupt, especially a supervolcano, occurs many miles/km underneath in the magma chamber. It‘s super complex and involves gases, chemical reactions and rising pressures. Even if you detonated a nuke inside the magma chamber it probably wouldn‘t do anything other than vaporising some magma.

[@Eshrakgaming934]

Simply this is an nuclear armageddon.

[@jimmyvincent123]

Nobody wins in a nuclear war.

[@matthewgrist6454]

Thanks. You’ve made for a bleaker outlook than “Threads” and that’s an achievement.

[@vojvoda]

No winners in this game!

[@manart3954]

At least it is the end of Boring ads on You Tube too

[@gravitydivide2576]

Why don't you just say it will be the end of the world and be done with it.

[@dinosmart1111]

Because it’s a simulation if you read the title. Meaning what happens throughout the beginning to end of it.

[@hemerhermenegild3261]

because you already know it and you would not watch this video

[@gravitydivide2576]

@@hemerhermenegild3261 I actually just got frustrated at the dragging of the concept that has always been known to only end in one conclusion. Yes, the simulation is interesting, but whatever or whoever pushes that button, it's too late by then. So, yeah = end of the world, or end of what we know now as the world.

[@onixxx1984]

Simple answer is no one would win, but the western powers have crowded cities, so I assume the human cost would be the highest with the regions densly populated.

[@OliverGrumitt]

So do counties like China.

[@USMC_LAterZ]

The Book of revelations reveals all of this.

[@gravitydivide2576]

Does it also reveal that you're an idiot following a false man written book?

[@MRogersneighborhood]

Yep it mentions Babylon and America is exactly Babylon description and to make things worse the ambassador of Russia just left the United States today which makes you believe that Russia is calling its people back home because they know what's about to occur remember Russia wants to win the fight with Ukraine America is supplying Ukraine weapons Iran wants to get rid of Israel Israel is being supplied by America those countries have nothing to lose if they both tag team and they both nuke America at the same time

[@justinkrajca5764]

Dude or chick if you believe this you are a more dumb then I thought

[@MrMcMuffinJr1999]

That’s just a book so…..

[@USMC_LAterZ]

@@MrMcMuffinJr1999 So, by the time you find out, it'll be too late.

[@jasonrist6582]

I only have two words: MY GOD

[@douglaspeach5489]

Nobody ever would win.

[@vision78678]

Assume a city resudents receive prior information of incoming nuclear bomb within one minure and they are told i cannot be stopped.....fifty percent may die just beause of listening the harsh news😢

[@unclemurdablackandyellow5481]

The US and Europe seems to think that they can survive and live like mad Max 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@SarahCrawford-e3i]

What U think bunkers are for. U ever played fallout my dude?

[@unclemurdablackandyellow5481]

@@SarahCrawford-e3i you can't be serious?a bunker? When we go into a nuclear winter for decades you will run out of clean air water and food you will be living like mad Max maybe. Go research modern nuclear weapons and how quick they will destroy the planet. This isn't a video game

[@chris__211]

We would more likely have a defense before Russia was

[@laurieevans9628]

​@@SarahCrawford-e3iyou come out of the bunker's to what? Nothing.

[@isobelmiddleton6353]

Scorched Earth

[@NoahGaming1101]

And what year will this be? Is the question of all.

[@MrEdmundF]

anyone who thinks a nuclear war can be won let alone fought is clearly a dolt

[@russforgus807]

I think the winners (if there are any ) would be the unlucky ones.

[@NoodleEstring]

I'd like to see a simulation for the southern hemisphere based on this 1.

[@reconnaissance7372]

We would literally destroy the evolution of our planet.

[@JaefarSABNW]

Tactical means Russia will use 1mt or larger weapons in the thousands l.

[@kingstonluna2008]

I love your videos please continue to make them!

[@WanderingSoul-MP6]

Nobody would win. “THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO PLAY”

[@BufanMuayThai]

So many errors… no, you can’t trigger Yellowstone, and no, 100-200Mt won’t cause a giant tsunami.

[@invictus2578]

There is no way a strike on Yellowstone would make that caldera erupt it would take a bomb with the yield of 500 megatons to vaporize enough bedrock to get to the magma chamber below a 300 kiloton ground burst would only vaporize enough bedrock to leave about a 100 foot deep crater

[@mmccarthy9458]

I am betting that both NATO and RUS/CHN/DPRK would not bother with a limited counterforce strike and would go straight from tactical nukes to comprehensive strategic strike hitting everything. Why risk not being able to do a countervalue strike when battle damage assessment takes time and that time results in the enemy's counterforce strike taking out your reserve missiles?

[@tonylyons7711]

I will tell you who will win...."KNOWONE"

[@musyimimichael8698]

We will all die like fools. Even bunkers are not safe considering the high tech weapons

[@hemerhermenegild3261]

mars

[@niaduong7626]

No one win. And you would not one to be alive after either. Not things left to lives

[@HellenVanPattersonPatton80]

What cities in the USA would be hit? 30 largest? 50 largest? Every city over 100k? Every state capital?

[@NoName-hg6cc]

"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play"

[@OliverGrumitt]

As the late astronomer Sir Patrick Moore wrote “if an advanced alien civilization visited Earth only to find a scorched desolate uninhabited planet, we (humans) shall only have ourselves to blame.” Such a prospect is at its strongest certainty since the end of the last Cold War and possibly since the Cuban Missile Crisis. We all thought the danger of nuclear war had gone away but with its sudden return in the last 3 years or so, time is running out to avoid it. As Sir Patrick also wrote “there may have been alien civilizations which have duly wiped themselves out, leaving behind radiation soaked death and it is tempting to believe Homo Sapiens will go the same way”. It is, certainly at the moment, hard to argue for the case that he was and is wrong.

[@jimmychin9666]

The meek will inherit the earth, so I'd have to put my money on the MEEK.

[@petem68]

Oh, and was a dustball they'd inherit...

[@mikhailmakarov8845]

Absurdly overestimated. Lets make a scenario. Russia has 1588 deployed warheads out of 4500 total. In day one it wont even be able to lauch all 1588. In retaliating attack nato can destroy most nukes that weren't used in day one. Based on command and logistics russia could launch 600 to 90p at best. Lets estimate its 900. 10 percent will fail. Another 20 to 40 will be intercepted. That leaves around 800. Absolute majority will be targeting military facilities. In order to destroy massive air bases and ports and industrial complexes you will need a lot of warheads. Some of corse will hit cities. Average 300 to 500 kt can kill half a million to a million in large cities like new York. Russia would use no more that 10 percent on cities. Its 80 warheads. So in the worst posibke outcome and warnings and preparations nato losses from 50 to 60 million dead out of 950 million population. Same for russia. So in this scenario like 90 to 100 million die not billions. But every year this number drops as number of decomisioned nukes growths. For example in 2023 450 warheads were dismantled. With this rate in less that 30 years alm nukes will be gone ofcorse no but they will decline in numbers

[@Maxfr8]

This is an odd scenario.

[@NYdaVinciBricks]

And u understand the ancient melted stone We did this before. And after this. It will happen again

[@alexsander6107]

The ideal are warheads of 9 megatons and above, as well as 10 megatons like Yvi Mike and 15 megatons like Castle Bravo, that would be total annihilation

[@richardyoung9024]

War of any kind is just plain DUMB!

[@sam3kperv]

Question, how would people in the Caribbean like myself know of this in a few minutes 🧐?

[@nicholaswoodall3840]

i have 3 years of supplies food water and i have my car full of gas and i have 10 gallons in gas i keep in my car trunk and i have a generator and lots of batterys put away

[@MrBose-kz6mi]

The leaders hardly can wait in using their toys, but they die too

[@Aufenthalt]

I missed who will win....

[@rollstuhlmeister]

Autobiles?

[@jacktettero4507]

You are in it

[@mickeyminime7556]

Neither side, but i can imagine Russia would cause more damage to the amount of nukes it has and how small America is due to land size.

[@WakoJacKooo]

Looking forward to it so i dont have to go to work 🎉🎉🎉

[@hemerhermenegild3261]

🤣, work is painfull isnt ? ,......find a better one ,....(im working on it too)

[@kronoscamron7412]

valid.... we reached a point that there are no easy solutions to this clusterfuck of a societal and political cascade failure .

[@pleasemisguideme345]

No doubt who is behind this video is there Ivan? Europe and America don’t need nukes to destroy Russia

[@CoosaRiver]

NOBODY wins if innocent people are murdered..

[@raphaelflores9496]

What is the Quantum Mechanics of nuclear war? Why is if call a nuclear armagedon?

[@preslyHawii908]

It reminds us that the quantum theory shows the measurement of shelter without shelter hause.

[@billjones1687]

No one dont need Ai to tell me that

[@RobertMarshall-d2n]

just say no to war only works if both sides agree to it. attacking another nation then claiming they started it is standard fare for dictators.

[@Kevinmsr]

Ask yourself, why would your almighty creator allow you to enter heaven

[@petem68]

Silly question.

[@kubel83]

Crazy to think someone wants to be king of the ashes. Because that is what will be left. Ashes.

[@spiritsealed]

And the people who caused this will be in underground bunkers with enough food to survive until they can come out

[@ParsonsFamilyChannel]

The head table that actually runs this world will not allow

[@GUNNERHEATTANK]

No one wins, except for South Africa

[@iermanicus]

Funny innacurate 😂 what would be minimal collateral damage involving a 300kt thermonuclear warhead detonation?

[@kronoscamron7412]

remember.... hide under a table... you will be safe 🤣

[@INONWO]

Very Scary indeed! I don't think I could survive.

[@bonginkosimotloung4440]

If I was Elon I was going to make a system that will detect on coming a nuclear rocket. I don't think it will be hard for with this space x tech

[@panospapavasiliou174]

Simple answer no one

[@jamesknapp1454]

“The only winning move is not to play”

[@darkshaman7087]

There will be no winners

[@sss.5751]

Dear God help us keep us all safe no matter what colour creed or country were from...WE ALL HUMANS DO NOT DISTROY MOTHER EARTH 😢

[@leg414]

This sounds like a happy projection....Culling the human herd...And finally...Someone mentioned how the Soviets would use warheads to cause a split in the continental U.S. and the damage in Yellowstone Park and this place would be finished! Peace

[@thomasforst7327]

No one will when all need

[@ebiker484]

I second that!!

[@martinbisschoff988]

Loved one of the opening statements......to "minimise collateral damage...." 😆😃🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃🤣Hell, why not get on with it? All else failed....to 'cure" human apathy.....😅😉🙃🙃🙃😊

[@paulsparks771]

A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? As for the Yellowstone supervolcano, it would take more than a few nukes to get that to erupt.

[@I_Stand_With_RussiaZOV]

No wins a nuked war

[@NathansWargames]

Nobody wins.

[@patclark2186]

You missed a few thing Comrad. True a European /Asian war will play out. But USA Agis ships with AN/SPY-6 radars and SM-3 missiles will intercept about 90% of those warheads.

[@joelara610]

The answer is NOBODY

[@kaxtorplose]

Good grief, the drama... Listen up, peeps. A nuclear strike on the Yellowstone caldera will almost certainly NOT cause a supervolcano eruption.

[@balfourwheatley6644]

care to elaborate?

[@backyardmicrobiology]

i hope you are right

[@shineadvertise]

Chatgbt "A nuclear strike on Yellowstone would be unlikely to trigger a supervolcanic eruption. While a nuclear explosion could cause localized damage, the magma chamber beneath Yellowstone is vast, and the immense pressure needed to cause a supervolcanic eruption far exceeds what a nuclear detonation could achieve. Geological forces required for such an eruption develop over thousands of years and involve a complex balance of magma pressure and tectonic shifts. In short, while a nuclear strike would be devastating in other ways, it wouldn't necessarily cause the Yellowstone supervolcano to erupt."

[@balfourwheatley6644]

@@shineadvertise thank you

[@geomax3465]

So... in resume... start playing Frostpunk. 😏

[@user-Bornagain]

If I was in charge. The U.S. will never be destroy i promise you I guarantee it.

[@tombrydson781]

There is no winners in any war

[@johndough-jr6od]

nobody. nobody will win. we all lose

[@bl5608]

No one win only who's left

[@burtonwilliams5355]

No one, NO ONE!

[@tomfin]

The only winning move is not to play

[@NoName-hg6cc]

How about a nice game of chess?

[@petem68]

@@NoName-hg6cc Nah, too violent 🤣

[@ferdinandparan-yz6uo]

No winners in a nuclear Armageddon

[@brucelee-nz2gl]

Everyone loses.. it sucks this power was developed

[@Michael-dr9wl]

There are no winners!

[@MrAllen-fv9cj]

Crocodiles be like, so what?

[@petem68]

All that would be left would be flies and cockroaches 🤣

[@Horatiuy]

It is a high chance that everyone would either die or go to the bunker. But I know you do not care, the people in here care about dogs not death.

[@DerBrew-yn1se]

Robot will win after ww3, 😂 alien and Robot gonna work together 😂. Can't wait see this.😊

[@notmyrealname6150]

The US needs more missiles.

[@Daiv-l9g]

No one will survive.

[@frankwenos641]

Only the aliens 👽 can save some of the species ❤, before someone release their nukes.