It blew up, but it was smaller than I anticipated. *cough cough*
@jaedenc.64624 жыл бұрын
Ahh yes, more than likely a fellow Redditor. And (that's what she said)
@ChristianMarzzelCazar2 жыл бұрын
What we learned today? it needs higher video quality.
@dhy53422 жыл бұрын
Gasoline doesn't explode, gasoline vapors do.
@GameStop-li5hp11 ай бұрын
You can't even call it an explosion, true
@omarjamal1612 жыл бұрын
Now I know. you learn new things every day
@travisk55892 жыл бұрын
This is why I top my tank off everyday.
@CoryBollig3 жыл бұрын
It's nice to know I knew the right answer. Question is... Will I remember 15 to 1 tomorrow? Yea, probably not.
@lucah18243 жыл бұрын
We've seen this concept lead to disaster before; TWA flight 800 is the best example of this
@omarjamal1612 жыл бұрын
The accident was officially attributed to the explosion of fuel vapors in an empty center fuel tank
@spana123321 Жыл бұрын
Fuel tankers in the U.K. have to carry petrol class placards for the next three loads if they are different fuel and this is why.
@kikyoC3 жыл бұрын
Lol so I should always keep my gas tank full to be safe 😆😆👌
@davidschwarz1196Ай бұрын
Tanker truck drivers all knew the answer
@rishabhagarwal8904 Жыл бұрын
Please tell me the name of this show that comes on National geographic/ history TV 18 or somewhere. Please share the name.
@An4rchy7911 ай бұрын
Searching for it too
@VoilentMan28 күн бұрын
street genius
@VoilentMan28 күн бұрын
@@An4rchy79 street genius
@VoilentMan28 күн бұрын
I used to watch it in my childhood has very much nostlgia with it
@author-vaule46773 жыл бұрын
How can you have a empty tank of gasoline
@pcdispatch2 жыл бұрын
Vapor
@rashidpervaiz35636 ай бұрын
Constantly Small quantity of fuel create cause of fumes it's also decrease efficiency and milage of vehicle.
@virondriver48233 жыл бұрын
That was mini explosion
@codydalton29834 жыл бұрын
C. Air and gas is a good combo
@briantaylor92852 жыл бұрын
It's the VAPOR, not the liquid.
@spana123321 Жыл бұрын
We spell it vapour love👍👍👍
@briantaylor9285 Жыл бұрын
@@spana123321 meh.
@aliar-d8nАй бұрын
Tim where is you’re friend
@samarkants44447 ай бұрын
What is the name of the show Pls tell
@NoVeuX5 ай бұрын
Street Genius
@christopherzobel3573 жыл бұрын
My guess is D, empty gas tank...
@lennyindrawati9016 Жыл бұрын
Do u have any english sub or indonesian sub?
@berkeuslu4 жыл бұрын
It does not makes sense how about if we try this experiment in a cold weather country?
@muhammadtofiq44514 жыл бұрын
Good idea
@satanic_panic6662 жыл бұрын
The same thing would happen. The temperature of the air has no effect on gasoline vapours igniting
@real.swing.474 жыл бұрын
حارس بس ما حرست نفسك 🤣😭
@NoVeuX5 ай бұрын
Show name - Street Genius
@sulev1112 жыл бұрын
and why would a closed tank explode? It wouldn't. Accidents happen when the lid is open and when it's open there won't be an explosion - the flames will just burst out and that's that.
@uluk66405 жыл бұрын
hadir terbaik
@retropcs883 жыл бұрын
Full tank will not explode, empty tank also will not explode. What explodes are the fumes, not the gas itself and if the tank is full there is no space for fumes so it might start pouring out and catching on fire but not an explosion. Half full is the most dangerous, as it has the perfect mix of oxygen/fumes, quarter full is still dangerous but it will not generate enough fumes to cause a big explosion
@kevinmahoney59233 жыл бұрын
Did you even watch the video?
@kevinmahoney59233 жыл бұрын
THIS ANSWER IS WRONG!!! EMPTY TANK WILL EXPLODE!!! / WTF????!!!!
@MrMarquinhos19674 жыл бұрын
daaaaaaaaa! realy? i born yesterday......! kkkkkkkkk
@akilles1087 Жыл бұрын
Obviously that last one wasn't truly "empty" 🤣
@Jonas_Albert3 жыл бұрын
You should have done a 75% gas, and 25% oxygen
@akilles1087 Жыл бұрын
21% oxygen wasn't good enough? 🤭
@UninstallingWindows2 жыл бұрын
The last one was clearly exaggerated with additional explosives, but in general, yeah, the point is correct...fuel vapors are more dangerous than fuel itself.
@petitio_principii Жыл бұрын
I share the same suspicion, I think it would be more interesting if they were more upfront about the details and maybe even had several versions of the empty take showing variations/failures to detonate in the movie-like way.
@parrsnipps44952 жыл бұрын
Empty tank wasn't true. If it was truly empty, meaning no fuel, no fumes, nothing, zero, it would have done nothing. So there had to be a small amount of fuel providing the fumes.
@satanic_panic6662 жыл бұрын
The only possible way for a fuel tank to have zero fumes is if there has never been gasoline in it This is experiment is done using real-world practicality. Your average Joe's empty fuel tank will have residual fumes inside.
@st91482 жыл бұрын
Why did they have to do the woman like that?? BECAUSE ITS BLUE!!! wtf was that intentional?? Schovinistic? watttttt