Barbary Lion Vs Siberian Tiger Fight - Who’s the Real King?

[@DKS-75]

Tigers are bigger, have bigger canines, bigger claws, more agile, can fight with both paws standing on hind legs, and above all tigers have bigger brains. Although the fight between the two big cats is likely to depend on the 2 individuals, the Tiger certainly has some edge. I will rate a fight between a Tiger and Lion to be 60 -40, meaning in 100 fights between tigers and lions, the Tigers are likely to win 60 times while lions 40 times.

[@zoooloogist]

reat breakdown! 💯 Tigers definitely have some impressive advantages, like their size, agility, and that unique ability to balance on their hind legs and strike with both paws. It's like the tiger has mastered the art of solo combat, while lions are more used to team play. 🐅 But while tigers might have that edge in a 1v1 scenario, lions bring their own set of skills to the table-like their sheer courage and experience fighting off rivals in the wild. A lion's life in a pride often involves constant skirmishes for dominance, which could help even the odds. I like your 60-40 estimate! It really shows how unpredictable these hypothetical matchups can be. In the end, it’s all about the individual cat, their experience, and how they use their strengths. Who knows, in a different setting or with different individuals, we could be looking at a whole new outcome. What do you think would happen if we threw in a seasoned Barbary lion or an extra-motivated Siberian tiger into the mix? 😯🔥

[@anirbanbiswas5955]

@@zoooloogist what about seasoned north indian tiger like Gunga aka Nina sahib?

[@zoooloogist]

​@@anirbanbiswas5955 Great question! Gunga was indeed a famous North Indian Bengal tiger known for his size and strength. Historical accounts suggest he was quite a formidable tiger. Comparing seasoned tigers like Gunga to Barbary lions is tricky, but Gunga's reputation shows how powerful Bengal tigers can be, especially with experience and maturity on their side.

[@charlesayodele2407]

In every encounter it's always the lion attacking while the tiger retreats. I think the lion has the edge with aggression and endurance.

[@zoooloogist]

Interesting observation! The lion’s natural behavior as a pride leader often translates to being more assertive and aggressive, which might explain why it’s seen attacking more often. Lions are built for endurance due to their need to defend territory and maintain dominance within their pride. On the other hand, tigers are generally solitary hunters and may rely more on strategic, powerful strikes rather than prolonged fights, which could explain why they seem to retreat to reassess rather than engage in continuous conflict. Both animals have unique strengths, and it’s fascinating to compare how their instincts and fighting styles differ. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!

[@charlesayodele2407]

@@zoooloogist I agree with your further analysis. I have watched and observed both lions and tigers and one thing that's clear is lion's need to constantly defend itself from infancy rough plays with its siblings to being chased out of the pride at adolescence to becoming a pride leader defending the pride from other lions. It's a life of constant battles and this gives lions an incomparable endurance. Tigers on the other hand, don't have to go through a life of constant fighting and defending due to their solitary nature. Tigers only look to hunt for food with occasional fights here and there. In my opinion, unless a tiger is considerably larger than a lion, the lion will always be the winner of a fight... Furthermore, the reason why lions are called the KING of beasts is because, unlike tigers, lions in their life journeys must ascend to a level where they have subjects and followers that they must protect and defend. Lions have a kingship type of leadership.

[@zoooloogist]

@@charlesayodele2407 the same has been discussed in our latest podcast: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bXnRgmVqicl9otE

[@DevenderKumar-ds4st]

There have been so much speculations on the fights of the two Goliaths, wirh no result favouring anyone clearly, it's high time to arrange such a fight in reality and find the real winner once for all and burv the ghost!

[@zoooloogist]

he Barbary lion is sadly extinct in the wild, so the idea of arranging a fight between these two incredible animals isn't just impossible, it’s a reminder of how important it is to protect what we have left. These creatures symbolize power and beauty, and their legacy should motivate us to focus on conserving their relatives, like African lions and Siberian tigers, rather than imagining scenarios that put them at risk. Let’s keep having these interesting discussions in a way that respects and preserves the wildlife we’re so fascinated by. Thanks for being part of this conversation!"

[@jaytenq]

Finally someone who knows about bit force 😹

[@zoooloogist]

Thanks! I'm glad you appreciated the details on bite force! It's such an interesting comparison because while lions have a slightly stronger raw bite force, tigers have a higher Bite Force Quotient (BFQ) when adjusted for their size. Both cats are incredibly powerful, and understanding these small differences really highlights just how formidable they are in their own ways! 😹

[@ponyboy2443]

Don't believe that or this please

[@ΓΙΩΡΓΟΣΠΑΠΑΒΑΣΙΛΕΙΟΥ-λ3ι]

Always Tiger wins much more stronger than the Lion !!

[@AndrewDavis-sj6mb]

Lion against Tiger I give a 6/10

[@CutthroatAlbanian]

Heavyweights Muhammad Ali versus George Foreman

[@zoooloogist]

That’s a great comparison! 🥊 Just like Ali vs. Foreman, where each fighter had unique strengths and styles, the Barbary lion and the Siberian tiger each bring their own advantages to the table. Ali had his speed and strategy, while Foreman had raw power and size. Similarly, the tiger has its size and strength, while the Barbary lion is known for its incredible resilience and fighting spirit. 🐅🦁 So, in a way, it’s not just about who’s bigger-it’s about their skills, instincts, and adaptability in a showdown. The real question is: who would play the role of Ali in this epic animal battle? 😉

[@branislavvasic474]

Bengal tiger vs Barbary lion 60 /40.Siberian tiger vs Barbary lion 100/0.

[@zoooloogist]

Interesting take! It’s definitely a heated debate among wildlife enthusiasts. While Siberian tigers are generally larger and more robust, the outcome of any hypothetical match would depend on many factors like age, health, and fighting experience of each animal. Nature isn’t always predictable! Thanks for sharing your view.

[@harishkiddy]

Tigers are solitary hunters, used to taking down large prey by themselves, whereas lions often rely on teamwork. Tigers are known for their agility and precision in delivering deadly strikes, especially with their powerful claws.While the Barbaric lion would put up a fierce fight, Even with a Bengal tiger's size, agility, and precision in attacks would likely give it the edge. In a one-on-one fight, the tiger's solitary hunting skills and raw power make it a stronger ...Bengal tigers are smaller than siberian tiger But agility and striking force Raection time is very quick Especialy Indian Sundarban tigers ....I saw many lion lovers who think they wouldn’t see a Bengal tiger or a Siberian tiger in real life. If they did, they would realize how ferocious tigers really are... Even in your video, the tiger looks small, but in reality, Siberian tigers are huge. Forest-grown tigers are much bigger and in better shape than zoo tigers. Tigers in the wild are far more dangerous than we think. Tigers are highly intelligent and strategic. They often retreat when a lion attacks, not out of fear, but because they are very calculative. Tigers won’t engage in a fight unless they sense a real threat to their life. However, when a tiger becomes furious, it can deliver powerful blows that can cause serious damage to a lion. Many lion lovers assume that a tiger will always run away, but research and experts know just how strong and capable tigers truly are. In fact, tigers' strength, agility, and sharp instincts make them formidable opponents in the wild.

[@zoooloogist]

Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. You can also watch our video on the size of the Siberian tiger: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b4CQl5afob-Nj7s

[@harishkiddy]

@@zoooloogist Thankyou and please do a seperate video of a tiger before that please do some Research.....As a kid i like lion most coz of some stories but as an adult i know the real value of tiger.... It's important to emphasize that wild tigers are very different from captive ones. Many people have only seen tigers in zoos and compare them to the wild ones, but tigers in the forest are much larger and have extraordinary skills. Filming a tiger in the wild is incredibly difficult-researchers often wait for days or even weeks, and the tiger usually senses them long before they spot it. Additionally, tigers from the Asian continent differ in size and strength compared to animals from regions like Africa or ancient Rome. If tigers had been present in those regions, they would likely have been regarded as kings of the animal world!

[@RajeshRavindranathan]

Dude, no facts are going to change the mind of people who thinks lions are stronger. They absolutely will get mauled in any actual encounters.

[@ikemo3551]

They are also known for running away from lions in fights and getting intimidated by 200lb goofy, fluffy sloth bears. They are quite impressive at these things. They know how to cower and submit to lions quite very well.

[@ikemo3551]

​@@RajeshRavindranathanYou d*mmy, these cats absolutely can kill each other and have done so in many fair legit encounters so many times throughout history. The lion is just a tad bit superior. The fact is that many bigcat trainers who have witnessed far too many accidental fights between these two felids have testified to the lion's superiority in combat. Only delusional tigertards who can't do independent research, lack critical thinking skills or logic still believe the popular misconception, unsubstantiated claims, that tigers are stronger.. lmao ahahahah 😂😂😂 None of you people have been able to actually prove this using science or anything relevant to this issue. Your tigers are hyper overrated animals that garnered popularity and fame mainly through propaganda, lies and disinformation. There is a reason lions earned far more reverring titles like "kings of beasts" more than other felids. And don't say it's because of their mane.. LMFAO. It's because they have shown to be superior and dominant over many land predators, which most likely includes your tigger.

[@RajeshRavindranathan]

No lions can ever match a tiger, fullstop

[@pedrohenriquetemistoclessi3273]

@@RajeshRavindranathan no

[@ikemo3551]

Ahahahahahah keep dreaming, buddy.

[@RajeshRavindranathan]

@@ikemo3551 no dreaming required, the facts speak for itself.

[@ikemo3551]

@@RajeshRavindranathan Nah you are dreaming and deluding yourself. Overrated fatgers aren't stronger. That is just a popular myth.

[@RajeshRavindranathan]

@@ikemo3551 No it isnt. If you dont trust the scientific evidence, the only one deluding themselves is you.

[@ponyboy2443]

Look they want to put this shit on here and say how much the tiger 🐅 out weighs the lion and that's true so why promote and uneven match. Now let put the same weight a 600 pound barby Lion and a 600 pound tigers and take it from there.. not and 750 to 800 pound tiger against a 600 pound Lion now is that fair no it ain't but they want to promote it ass if it's equal. Smh

[@zoooloogist]

You make a solid point! 💯 Weight definitely plays a big role in animal matchups like this. Comparing a 750-800 pound Siberian tiger to a 600-pound Barbary lion isn’t exactly fair when it comes to size alone. 🐅🦁 But the discussion often goes beyond weight-factors like muscle density, agility, fighting instincts, and experience in battles also matter. That said, a more balanced comparison at the same weight, like a 600-pound tiger versus a 600-pound lion, would definitely be interesting and give a clearer picture of their individual strengths. It’s all about looking at the full context and understanding that weight isn’t the only thing that defines a powerful predator! 💥 What do you think would happen if we set up an equal-weight showdown? 👀

[@ErenFelek]

Dreams

[@ikemo3551]

Either cat can kill each other in a hypothetical fair fight but the barbary lion is the more likely winner in a fight. Barbary lion would decimate a siberian tiger and this would be the more likely result than the other way around for reasons. There is a case of the smaller asiatic lion defeating and killing a siberian tiger in a fight. If an asiatic lion could do it, imagine what a barbary lion could do. Barbary lions are certainly stronger than siberian tigers. In fact, since modern siberian tigers are,on average, even slightly smaller than bengal tigers and African lions, barbary lions, which are similar in size to subsaharan lions, are certainly bigger and stronger than siberian tigers. Lions have more musclemass percentage, more dense powerful muscles and bones than tigers. Lions as a species, are more combative, more aggressive, deadlier fighters than tigers and are also more durable, possess higher stamina, and endurance than tigers do. The siberian tiger wouldn't even be able to get through the extremely thick mane of the barbary lion, which are thicker and denser than those of Sub-Saharan African lions. A Lion is a Lion, whether it is a barbary, subsaharan or asiatic. It is still a lion. They are simply superior to tigers.

[@zoooloogist]

While it's true that both Barbary lions and Siberian tigers are powerful predators, the outcome of a fight would depend on individual factors like size, strength, and experience. Historically, there isn't enough evidence to definitively say one would always win over the other. Siberian tigers, known for their solitary hunting and strength, are formidable opponents. Similarly, lions, with their natural combative nature and muscle mass, are fierce fighters. Both animals have their unique advantages, and any outcome is speculative. It’s important to appreciate the strengths of both species without assuming one is universally superior.

[@jaytenq]

8:36 the tiger is more likey to retreat as it is a solitary animal not want injuries

[@zoooloogist]

You're right. Tigers, being solitary animals, often avoid unnecessary confrontations to minimize the risk of injury, which could affect their ability to hunt​. In the wild, tigers tend to be more cautious since they rely solely on themselves for survival. Lions, on the other hand, are more social and often fight to defend their pride, making them more likely to engage in battles. It's definitely an important factor to consider in a potential lion vs. tiger scenario!

[@bakimc4722]

The lion has no chance

[@p.action_br]

The tiger would lose by forfeit. Tigers would never fight to the death against a lion.

[@alanjipy55]

Lions dont fight each other to the death 1v1

[@bakimc4722]

Did you come up with this yourself or did someone help you?

[@Wahid910]

لاطاقة لأي ببر بقتال عادل مع أسد جنوب إفريقي أو أسد بربر

[@michaelairjordan23GOAT24]

The lion king!!!!!🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 👑 🦁is winner

[@Wahid910]

أسد بربر أسد بلدي

[@ErenFelek]

only one king MALE LION wins

[@michaelairjordan23GOAT24]

The Lion King 🦁 👑 beat the Tiger

[@Nature-AR-j6w]

barbary lion is much stronger than tiger do you know why because a lion never gives up in a fight tiger does

[@zoooloogist]

Thanks for your comment! It’s true that lions, especially Barbary lions, have a reputation for not giving up easily in a fight due to their strong territorial and pride-defending instincts. Lions often fight until one is unable to continue, driven by their social nature and need to protect their pride. Tigers, on the other hand, being solitary animals, might avoid prolonged fights to minimize the risk of injury since they rely on themselves for survival​ That said, both animals have their own unique strengths, lions with their sheer determination and tigers with their agility and precision. It's always an interesting debate!

[@holmes1978]

Tiger

[@parthasarathisarkar3255]

Tiger fan lacey wonderland channel!!!

[@lionswrath6410]

Barbary Lion would win against the Siberian Tiger.

[@Evansventura-tc7cq]

Lion wins

[@mesfintsegaye4077]

No question that tiger is a killer and lion is a warrior. If lions have no mane, almost always the tiger would win. However, the mane protect the lion from pin down by the tiger. Meaning that the tiger would always intends to retreat to avoid injuries. Lions won’t back down as they are social cats injury is part of their journey and someone will provide their dinner.

[@zoooloogist]

You nailed it. “tiger is a killer, and lion is a warrior” really captures their styles! 🦁🐅 The lion’s mane acts like armor, protecting it in battle, while their social nature toughens them up for constant clashes. Tigers, being solo hunters, focus on quick, powerful strikes to avoid drawn-out fights. It’s like two different fighting philosophies: the relentless lion vs. the tactical tiger. 💥 If their roles were reversed, it’d be wild to see how they’d adapt! What do you think, could a tiger thrive in a pride, or a lion go solo? 🤔🔥

[@shivasahilraj25]

You are nice youtuber. You say it's 50:50. No one is weak both are strong.. but wild cienBias will disagree with you..

[@zoooloogist]

Thank you for your comment! I appreciate your thoughts, and you're right-both the lion and tiger are incredibly strong animals, each with their own unique strengths. While I presented it as a 50:50 battle for entertainment, it’s true that different experts and studies might lean one way or another. "WildCiencias" and other sources may have different opinions based on factors like agility, bite force, or fighting styles. Ultimately, it’s a close call, and much of it depends on the scenario. It’s always fun to debate, and I love hearing diverse perspectives! Feel free to share your thoughts on who might have the upper hand in different situations. 😊

[@shivasahilraj25]

50:50

[@GazanferAKINCI]

Claw sizes are wrong. They have similar length of claws. Canine of tiger is slighlty longer.

[@zoooloogist]

While both big cats have retractable claws that are incredibly sharp, tigers' claws tend to be longer and more curved, which helps them deliver more devastating wounds. However, lions’ claws are thicker and straighter, built for gripping prey during group hunts. So, the difference in claw length and structure is small but notable, especially considering the unique ways each species uses their claws. Furthermore, claw size depends upon the size of the animal.

[@Khabib007-e5l]

Tiger easily

[@sidneywilder2731]

Tiger looses easily, do your research on the subject ,there's over 100 accounts of lions 🦁 killing tigers over the last 100 years

[@GazanferAKINCI]

False informations...

[@zoooloogist]

Thanks for your comment! I always strive to provide accurate information, but if something seems off, feel free to point it out.

[@ErenFelek]

Many 100s years MALE LION number 1 TIGER 3 LIONS Figth can go all Nigth Tiger only sort time Beacouse tiger spen all his energy MALE LION more smart on figth Tiger when he see he can win hi run LION figth to death one king his life is all figth skill his got Hoa to use hes energy and power he calclate well he wrestles then give the finel blow makes him KING

[@RajeshRavindranathan]

rubbish, stop making up stories or tell us where it happened except in your head.

[@xphaisalx]

This is a myth that Barbary lion was bigger lion. Fact is they were same as regular size lions. Due to cold climate they had bigger mane that’s all

[@zoooloogist]

Thanks for sharing your perspective! While it’s true that the Barbary lion's larger mane helped them adapt to colder climates, there are some historical accounts and studies that suggest they were slightly larger in size compared to other lion subspecies. However, reliable measurements are scarce since they went extinct in the wild long ago. The mane size can definitely create an impression of greater size. It’s a fascinating topic with a lot of debate!