If you try to thicken the sweep, you would run into problems. I had wrongly assumed that it would work. I really should have done the due diligence in testing it out before making the video. Sorry about this. Since then, I have been trying to adjust the sweep profile such that the thicken would work. It was not as simple as I thought! The thicken function does not play well with certain curvatures. Do try to adjust the profile yourself and let me know your results!
@Kojotous0079 ай бұрын
Would be great to make YT membership of your channel. I would definitely become member :-) ❤
@lonikur_9 ай бұрын
As a workaround for the failed thickening I could create two surface bodies from sweeping two segments and thicken them individually, then combine. However sweeping in one step and cutting the swept surface in separate bodies didn't achieve the same result. Awesome channel btw, by far my favourite fusion tutorials.
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
@@lonikur_ Interesting. How did you delineate the two sweep segments? After thickening each segment individually, was there any mismatch?
@lonikur_8 ай бұрын
@@Fusion360School I rechecked and found one difference to your example: Your sketchplane for the sweep-profile intersects through the middle of a segment of the Path. I created the profile for the sweep on a construction plane at the end of one of the path segments. That way you can use the same profile for sweeping two halves of the path. There is no interference/gap for the resulting thickened objects. Hope that explanation helps
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
@@lonikur_ The sketch plane intersecting a segment does seem to be a problem. In the end, I got it to work by splitting the segment, sweeping one half, thickening and then mirroring. But it is not smooth along the mirror plane. I should try a profile at the end of one of the segments like you suggested.
@Kojotous0079 ай бұрын
Your case studies are the best for understanding Fusion 360 ❤
@CraigHollabaugh9 ай бұрын
I always learn new design approaches with your "how many ways" videos. Thank you.
@tryuraАй бұрын
Amazing video, thank you
@joshuabarr54279 ай бұрын
Comment for the algo
@lesslong2992Ай бұрын
In the ch3 offset face method, you can just delete the extra face.
@mickylindle28 күн бұрын
No revolve? Hmmm
@ProfessorDanielLobao9 ай бұрын
Muito bom
@WPGinfo9 ай бұрын
Excellent video, showing various strategies! Thank you.
@szmano9 ай бұрын
lol, that was my reddit post asking for the tip 😄
@kkosciusz9 ай бұрын
And I provided the response with surface sweeps. What a small world 😂
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
@@kkosciusz When I attempted to thicken my sweep, it actually failed. I downloaded your file from your reddit response. Your approach was very interesting. I was pleasantly surprised that the ruled face actually rounded itself at the four corners! Also, your profile was drawn on the side. I should try doing that too.
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
Thank you for the inspiration!
@Flygtraktor8 ай бұрын
This is how CAD instructional videos shall be made!
@MrJdorrington9 ай бұрын
Thank you for "over thinking" your modelling. I for one benefit from the different perspectives. Indeed, my initial thought was to sweep this model and we now know that was under thinking. 😂
@adambergendorff27028 ай бұрын
Every time you start with how to model this I'm lost and you come up with such an easy way of doing it! Awesome!
@MegaModelista8 ай бұрын
Excellent lesson....learning a lot always!!!
@JuanAdam129 ай бұрын
No better fusion 360 lessons than these.
@thepieking18129 ай бұрын
Great video. While watching it i thought of a problem i had. Is there a clever way to design grips? I talking about tool, drill or weapon's grips. The only way i found (after watching hull modeling tutorials) is making a lot of sketches and then lofting it in some devious ways. Only to later found out that is was not comfortable at all. So is there a way i design them at least conveniently or moreover a way to make them easily adjustable. My model also looked weird(the light was rendering badly?) - i dont know if thats fixable, but i would be happy to know the answer why it happened.
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
It really depends on the complexity of the pattern. Sometimes, you can get way with circular pattern of a simple extrude. Or you can use emboss, which can be a tricky tool to use. If the handle is not circular, that adds to the complexity. General rule is to not pattern sketches and pattern features instead.
@VinayVarsani9 ай бұрын
I was thinking for the sweep to use the original sketch profile and sweep a rectangle or the non-filleted cross-section along the arc
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
That is certainly one way to create the main block instead of using the thin extrude.
@szmano9 ай бұрын
i created a U shaped profile perpendicular to the line and arc, and use swipe, than with cut on offset plane shape made the hole
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
Sounds workable. With this method, how would you achieve the rounded ends?
@piranin6669 ай бұрын
thx!!!!
@robertlee65299 ай бұрын
Just a quick question, how did you rotate the model during 00:02~00:10 in the 3d view? What hotkeys were you using? Thanks.
@vvviiimmm9 ай бұрын
My guess he's using a spacemouse (3Dconnexion or something similar), I don't think it's possible to do that with regular mouse + shortcuts
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
I am using a 3D connexion mouse. A regular mouse cannot achieve this kind of smoothness. Sometimes, I wonder why not? Not sure if it is a hardware or software limitation.
@corymullins72019 ай бұрын
Hi there, I always enjoy watching your videos as they give me better ideas for how to design a partsin Fusion. As I watched through the video I did have a question are there any benefits or detractions to the different ways these have been designed?
@Fusion360School8 ай бұрын
I would say that the solid method is probably the most straightforward method, but it might be more difficult to make adjustments after the fact since the material thickness is already there. The surfacing methods are more complicated but allow for more flexibility in adding extra flanges, etc.
@corymullins72018 ай бұрын
@@Fusion360School interesting and awesome, thanks for the reply!