Our Dash Cam Store (Use code DCOA5 for 5% off storewide): www.dashcamowne... Send us a video: dashcamownersa... Our second channel: / channel Description: "Rubbish truck hit a parked car in Melbourne on 16/08/22."
Пікірлер: 1 800
@teraris2 жыл бұрын
For all the people saying that the street is narrow because of council greed or a lack of planning perhaps fail to realise that the streets in this area of Melbourne are at least 70 years old and date from a time when cars were both smaller and far fewer in number. The solution here would be to remove on-street parking from one side of the street and realign the markings accordingly.
@stevie-ray20202 жыл бұрын
Totally agree!
@basby762 жыл бұрын
I thought you couldn’t park opposite unbroken white lines?
@alexnikolov2 жыл бұрын
@cookiemonster "a bright yellow stationary vehicle" lol
@PROVOCATEURSK2 жыл бұрын
Who wants to park can do it on their own property, not on a public road.
@wowwipeout712 жыл бұрын
Or...just make it rule to park on the nature strip or have half the car on the strip!!! Having lived in these area before, i've had times where l couldn't even enter my own street all because a stupid council were fining people for parking on the on the nature trip!!!
@Doddibot2 жыл бұрын
At fault are the urban planners and city councillors for allowing on-street parking on both sides of such narrow streets.
@mkvector95392 жыл бұрын
And allowing trucks through narrow streets?
@ESPSJ2 жыл бұрын
@@jerrygrey996 Yes it is, he's legally parked as per the sign.
@aaronleverton42212 жыл бұрын
@@mkvector9539 You have another solution for refuse collection?
@tewaewae2 жыл бұрын
@@mkvector9539 you think residents would carry their rubbish to a larger street?
@pervertt2 жыл бұрын
This is in Glen Eira, where most streets were laid out a century ago or more. No giant rubbish trucks or wheelie bins back then. And most traffic engineers will happily remind you that streets are for moving traffic, not act as a defacto car park.
@highlysuggestible8612 жыл бұрын
Well in the truck driver's defense, it's not like the Monaro was bright f%^&*n yellow or anything.
@TC-yx2ss2 жыл бұрын
The risk you take parking a dark coloured car in an unlit part of town at night;)
@swinetrek2 жыл бұрын
It's defence not defense
@highlysuggestible8612 жыл бұрын
@@swinetrek I knew that!! I just wanted to know if yoou knew that.
@juddy_1997 Жыл бұрын
@@TC-yx2ss If your car somehow doesn't have park lights.
@brianspencer63972 жыл бұрын
Monaro is behind the 'No Standing' sign, and tyres are pretty close to the kerb before the truck drags him sideways - so he's legally parked. Grey Ford is also legally parked, and the oncoming cars are reasonably close to the kerb. Garbo apparently didn't use his left mirror to check his clearance to the 'bright yellow obstruction', and hit the stationary, legally parked car, so it'll all be on him.
@BlairSauer2 жыл бұрын
I agree. That's an expensive fuck up. At least the Monaro is repairable. However the Garbo didn't stop straight away but managed to pull up on the other side of the roundabout. Monaro driver didn't look very impressed at all given that the car is a modern classic and is worth a lot of money. And I wouldn't be impressed either if that was me in that situation. The Garbo had room to go a little wide across the centre line to avoid the vehicle provided that he pays attention to oncoming traffic. Having said that, the cars coming the opposite direction would have to move over a little to give the Garbo some room. Makes sense? I think it does. Hopefully the owner of the Monaro will have his vehicle repaired and back on the road as soon as possible. Garbo will have to cough up.
@justwhy24842 жыл бұрын
Victorian Road Safety Rules 2017 reg 208(6) If the road has a continuous dividing line or a dividing strip, the driver must position the vehicle at least 3 metres from the continuous dividing line or dividing strip, unless otherwise indicated by information on or with a parking control sign.
@arendeepropertymaintenance2 жыл бұрын
Both cars illegally parked.
@BlairSauer2 жыл бұрын
@@justwhy2484 fair enough. As Brian stated in his above comment. That Monaro was legally parked and close to the gutter within the parking lines behind the no standing sign. The Garbo obviously wasn't watching what he was doing and therefore clipped the Monaro and then felled a small tree afterwards for his trouble. Says a bit about his driving. That Monaro had every right to be parked there where he was. Although the incident wasn't helped by the fact that the street is a little narrow for a Garbo to go down without too much trouble. That street wasn't really designed to have trucks and cars go down it.
@BlairSauer2 жыл бұрын
@@arendeepropertymaintenance doesn't appear that way. It seems the cars are legally allowed to park on that street. Of course that incident wasn't helped by the fact that the street was narrow and only caters for cars and not trucks. That's how I see it.
@leonkernan2 жыл бұрын
Considering the truck driver hit the tree, i'm going to question his driving ability.
@YesNoMaybeIDntKnwDoU2 жыл бұрын
I know aye FMD no idea how to drive a truck 😂
@SirSpinalColumn2 жыл бұрын
Good to see you’re so perfect. He was obviously stressed after side swiping the car and looking for somewhere to park on a tiny street. The council shouldn’t allow people to park that close to the roundabout, otherwise this never would have happened!
@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns2 жыл бұрын
He was probably shocked and not paying attention to the branch above him. The tree was overhead, while he remained on the road. Councils have it in their bylaws that they need to cut down branches in that sort of position anyway. No serious harm done. Every driver makes a mistake and this was an acceptable mistake as a one-off.
@jasonderp59332 жыл бұрын
Legally you're not supposed to park within 20 ft
@errolfeistl17052 жыл бұрын
@@jasonderp5933 You can see where the "no standing" sign is to indicate where you can park... The Monaro was parked legally so not a problem
@antman35252 жыл бұрын
The Monaro driver seems calmer than l would be. As much as you repair it, it will never be original
@android5842 жыл бұрын
Probably hadn't had enough time for it to sink in. Had to try to talk to the Garbo before he drove off!
@MattExzy2 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of getting side-swiped by a giant horse float at a round-a-bout. Lick of paint and rearview got shoved forward momentarily, but nothing terrible compared to this.
@iliketurtles44632 жыл бұрын
The motorcyclist in me is blaming the little blue car! I'd have been much further to my left and not bottlenecking the truck into the Holden, not just because I am considerate but because I don't particularly want to get hit myself...
@takemasu452 жыл бұрын
Had to dig through replies to find this. Finally someone has some situational awareness
@dylwhite88312 жыл бұрын
yeah i was looking at the solid metre between the matchbox car and the gutter thinking the same thing!
@bellarose-au2 жыл бұрын
My conclusion too.
@KeppyKep2 жыл бұрын
I agree, the blue car certainly didn't make it easy for the truck. But at the end of the day, the truck was the only moving vehicle. So entirely his fault.
@takemasu452 жыл бұрын
@@KeppyKep correct. Ignore this other bloke with his risk 'elimination'. That would just be having no one drive anywhere. An accident occurred, and the truck driver was at fault. That's all
@snowflake83692 жыл бұрын
Imagine having to drive a big ass truck through those narrow-ass streets all day. Good job to whoever thought of planning a road that is only wide enough to fit one lane of traffic with cars parked on both sides. See this shit too often.
@dirtmcgirt1682 жыл бұрын
They do make narrower trucks now
@arendeepropertymaintenance2 жыл бұрын
Well, both cars were illegally parked, so there is that, but hitting a stationary vehicle makes it a bit dodgy.
@thaZEBRAmussel2 жыл бұрын
Narrow streets in all the new estates, it's ridiculous. Stuff the garbo trucks, what happens when a fire truck or ambulance has to get through. But I'm sure some fat cat has decided the widths are to specification. Absolute joke.
@molewil75572 жыл бұрын
Considering this is in Glen Eira and is inner city Melbourne, this roads been there since before trucks
@daveallen48782 жыл бұрын
Streets are too narrow deal with it, That's what mirrors are for, cant fit reverse simple as that. Hitting cars not using your mirrors typical BUM..
@armzbrah63712 жыл бұрын
Some streets in Australia are so poorly planned its pure cancer
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
Almost no streets were planned in Melbourne or Sydney (probably Brisbane either)
@nostalgiaof982 жыл бұрын
that's just anyone in a government or council position
@AussieChad2 жыл бұрын
As a former Garbo I can sympathize with this bloke. While technically he was at fault for the car, my experience with councils, Vic roads and Parks Victoria says that if the waste collection company complained about both the parking and the low tree branches, those complaints would be instantly dismissed, regardless of the obvious danger to the public. In Mentone for example, there is a gum tree branch about a foot thick over the road on a bend, forcing the truck drivers to move over the middle line (toward oncoming traffic) to avoid it, Kingston council received a number of complaints from at least two garbage collection companies for more than a decade and it is still there to this day because "the residents might complain".
@ASMRchildrensbookreading2 жыл бұрын
Electric chainsaws are a thing of beauty
@Sam_Green____41142 жыл бұрын
Greta Garbo ? Yes l liked her as well !
@Greenman30662 жыл бұрын
I hear you, we have large gum tree branches above power lines, no matter how much we complain the council has never cut them. As the droop down over time eventually they come to rest on the power lines then as they rub backwards and forwards over time they cut through and drop to the ground. Ridiculous.
@steved37022 жыл бұрын
They've go a solution for that! Put up a sign warning of low-hanging branches! Those signs are near me.
@layndaratphenain39542 жыл бұрын
I think the car is at fault for parking too close the unbroken centre line, near the intersection, same as illegally parked car other side of the road. So, if you're illegally parked and get hit, it's your fault and likely not covered by insurance. The fault of the garbage truck driver is only in not stopping to make sure others not injured and to exchange particulars
@ESPSJ2 жыл бұрын
everyone on the Facebook post was giving the Monaro so much shit for being illegally parked, but he's not? He's right before the no stopping zone. I honestly think facebook comments should always be turned off for DCOA, the people on there are so abusive and always victim blame.
@Scottyy7882 жыл бұрын
It's because facebook is full of boomers
@----.__2 жыл бұрын
@@Scottyy788 stop being racist
@mangoman21482 жыл бұрын
I also noticed that on both sides of the road just before the roundabout, one end of a painted parallel parking spot is painted, but then there's no other end painted closer to the roundabout. I guess the no standing signs denote the far end of the parking area? Personally I haven't seen that kind of thing before, usually if one end is painted then so is the other, unless there's an obvious barrier like a protruding kerb. Agree that Monaro is legally parked, providing his nose was behind the sign.
@oldbloke1002 жыл бұрын
@@Scottyy788 someone say rude words to you sookum's. Hahaha
@sessi00002 жыл бұрын
I really don't miss the toxicity on their Facebook page anymore and if their KZbin page is anything to go by, its a lot more "upper-class" lmao I legit got banned on their fb page for sticking up for another member of the page after the admin was an ass hole to her lmao. 🤣
@fuzzycuzzy2 жыл бұрын
I mean you're playing with fire parking that close to a roundabout when theres also a car on the other side... If its not an illegal park the truck is still at fault though.
@Nutsaur2 жыл бұрын
Am I allowed to crash into illegally parked cars?
@JontyHare2 жыл бұрын
Truck is still at fault illegally parked or not, they have the higher duty of care to avoid a collision
@bohemas012 жыл бұрын
The cars on the other side had come to a stop to allow the truck through.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
@@Nutsaur Not illegally parked
@eaglen00b2 жыл бұрын
@@Nutsaur If you're a famous or powerful person, sure.
@jimmyjango52132 жыл бұрын
You cannot park on the side of the road when there is less than three meters between the edge of your car and the center-line, or the other side of the road (on narrow roads). The Monaro was parked with less than three meters between it and that line so that is against the road rules. Note how the marked car parks are located in an area of the road without a center-line? The center-line is near the intersections to keep them clear to allow safe passage of traffic, which unfortunately the Monaro driver didn't do. The truck should not have crashed into it however, so maybe the Micra was coming at it or jammed it who knows as I cannot tell.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The 3 metre rule only applies if the dividing line is continuous. There is a break in the dividing line which can be seen between the yellow and blue cars. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked.
@jimmyjango52132 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug Where the car was parked the line was continuous as the line was coming from the roundabout. You can't park that close to the intersection industrial by the continuous line. The gap in the line was behind the car (or at the rear of it). Common sense - why would he stop there? Theres no room.
@MikeC19652 жыл бұрын
Too many parked cars on the streets now, leaving 2 lanes of carriage way down to a single two way lane, and not enough room for large bin trucks etc.
@brosert2 жыл бұрын
Council's fault (and truck drivers) - the "No Stopping" sign pointing the other way suggests you can park there, but in fact you can't because you need to leave a 3m clearance to the solid line markings in the middle of the road. Council would claim he was illegally parked, however he could argue that given the presence of the sign "any reasonable person" would assume it's ok to park behind it.... That sort of stuff is tough on truck drivers - but if you don't know if you have room you stop rather than ploughing through cars (unless you're in a fire engine responding to a call).
@callitagain2 жыл бұрын
Besides, who said he was parked? He was just making sure nobody was in the roundabout. Truck driver illegally overtook.
@TheDocSRKA2 жыл бұрын
Only need to leave clearance “unless otherwise indicated” such as by the parking bay lines and signage that says parking there is legal.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The 3 metre rule only applies if the dividing line is continuous. There is a break in the dividing line which can be seen between the yellow and blue cars. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked.
@brosert2 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug "Continuous dividing line or a dividing strip" - Island and lines around it are a dividing strip. The parking bays maybe changes things (the law is actually unclear on that - 208.6 only mentions parking control signs signs, and 208.9 mentions road markings, but seems to suggest it relates to angle parking) - and I hadn't noticed them originally. The sign doesn't mean anything - just because you can't park forward of the sign doesn't actually mean you can behind it. That said, if you got booked parking and took it to court you would probably (successfully) argue "any reasonable person would assume if it explicitly says 'No Standing' in one direction then it must be ok to park in the other direction, but technically the sign pointing the other way doesn't mean you can in the other direction
@brosert2 жыл бұрын
@@TheDocSRKA "unless otherwise indicated by information on or with a parking control sign" Doesn't mention parking bays (there is bays mentioned in another subrule, but that seems to suggest it applies angle parking). While there is a sign there, it only shows that you can't park in one direction not that you can in the other. In any case my original point is it's partly the local council's fault for creating the situation (although the collision itself is the truck's fault).
@RARDingo2 жыл бұрын
The fault lies with council for allowing developers to build such ridiculously small streets.
@bugeye87492 жыл бұрын
A good driver would’ve known not to park there lmao
@neilharrison75552 жыл бұрын
Ooh, difficult one...! Reckon the driver of the garbo truck should have stopped & asked the dopey parker to "please move, we can't get through". Conversely, dopey in the Monaro should NOT have parked/stopped there, as he had seriously affected the width of road available to other road-users. (A car or tradie's ute could probably have got through ok, but a larger truck [ or a garbo truck], not a chance. It was just a wee bitty silly of Mr. Garbo trying to get through, and he was going far too fast, he should have "edged" through...."The Garbo must get through" (Shades of the Pony Express, "The Mail must get through".)
@holgerlubotzki34692 жыл бұрын
Truck should not have attempted to drive on when the way forward was obstructed.
@Alice-ui9oy2 жыл бұрын
When I saw the title I guessed Monaro at fault- generally when you have a run in with a garbage truck it's your fault.. they move slowly and are pretty hard to miss... This one though was just flying down the narrow street and clipped a parked car. Whether the car should have been there or not is beside the point- garbage truck didn't even attempt to slow down to navigate the narrow space. No one should be going that fast down obstructed roads anyway where the visibility is do poor- I would be worried about hitting someone crossing the road who hadn't seen me coming from behind all the parked cars!!! Or what about kids running out onto the street.. it's just completely reckless driving.
@bernielennox10312 жыл бұрын
Unless there is a sign saying that you can, you are not allowed to park, stop or leave your vehicle within 10 metres of: either side of an intersection without traffic lights. either side of a safety zone. Monaro shouldn't have been there
@kaasha772 жыл бұрын
@@bernielennox1031 or opposite the unbroken white lines. they are there for a reason. amazes me how few people know this
@user-pn4py6vr4n2 жыл бұрын
@@bernielennox1031 The presence of the No Stopping sign implies that you can park behind it. Whoever decided that people should be permitted to park vehicles in such a narrow street is an idiot and should be sacked, but there's implied permission to park. You don't spend the money to put up No Stopping signs, and don't then use them to denote all the no stopping areas.
@Alice-ui9oy2 жыл бұрын
@@bernielennox1031 Beside the point whether Monaro should have been there. You can't plough through a child running out onto the street and claim that the child shouldn't have been there. If you have the ability to stop and avoid the accident then you have a responsibility to do so. That truck driver just drove down the street like s/he was the only one on the road.
@Peter_Riis_DK2 жыл бұрын
@@bernielennox1031 So, if you need a new wing or a headlight, you should just find an illegally parked car and ram it? Thanks, mate! 😆
@MatthewCreasey2 жыл бұрын
Since the car isn't moving, and the truck ran into it, that's the truck's fault.
@iDrive1232 жыл бұрын
No way!
@aussiecamperman83822 жыл бұрын
By law your not allowed to stop or park any closer than 10 mtr from a corner so the commodore is actually at fault.
@ameetnarayan92192 жыл бұрын
Look at the no stopping sign before the roundabout sign, commodore driver may not be at fault here the car was well behind the no stopping zone as indicated by the arrow on the sign
@MatthewCreasey2 жыл бұрын
@@aussiecamperman8382 That's not how it works. You can't run into visible stationary objects even if they are in the wrong location.
@krispykruzer2 жыл бұрын
And the truck runs into a few trees down the road
@aussie81142 жыл бұрын
damn shame, a beautiful Monaro all buggered up. Garbo was not cautious enough in his manoeuvring. A tight fit but still he was not cautious enough.
@ghostofdre2 жыл бұрын
Regardless of how the Monaro is parked it's up to the truck to judge that there is enough room to pass a stationary vehicle without a collision.
@ghostofdre2 жыл бұрын
@SaltyBrains not sure if you're replying to me but if you think I said the Monaro is blameless you need to get your glasses checked.
@SirSpinalColumn2 жыл бұрын
The council is to blame. We have lots of stupidly tight streets in my area of Sydney and they’re just asking for issues like this. I can only imagine what it’s like to navigate a truck like this, with the driver often on the left side of the cab, having to dodge all the parked cars.
@ChrisCre8tor2 жыл бұрын
not when they start filling streets with duplexes
@RexColt2 жыл бұрын
This was in Melbourne
@dallasgrant2 жыл бұрын
Same where I live, new estates have 2 lane streets and people park on both sides overnight, hell even during the day at times, streets are a nightmare for anything bigger than a van, I hate to think what happens when a fire truck needs to get through.
@iliketurtles44632 жыл бұрын
@@dallasgrant firetrucks got them steel bumpers! I'd almost love to see that!
@SirSpinalColumn2 жыл бұрын
@@RexColt I know its Melbourne, I'm just saying I know the frustration of poorly planned residential streets and I'm not even a truck driver.
@jasonayres2 жыл бұрын
A few years ago, a nearby council, with similarly narrow streets, carved (for want of a better word) sections out of the grassed areas next to the foot path, for cars to park. Traffic hazards, anxious garbage truck drivers, parking problems.. Solved.
@kyrollos0208 Жыл бұрын
That sounds good. It would be good if sections of the grassed areas are carved out in more similar narrow streets. Or people could park their vehicles on the grass instead of on the road.
@jasonayres Жыл бұрын
@@kyrollos0208 Yes, it's neat and tidy, and there is still space for the footpath. They have the light rail going through their area, and had to stop on street parking, on the main road. It's not every day I congratulate a council for their foresight, but credit where credit is due.
@benhall8172 Жыл бұрын
@@jasonayres While they're at it put the power underground, rates would go up but so would home values.
@RemusKingOfRome2 жыл бұрын
"NOT the MONARO !! .. I just vacuumed the exhaust pipe .."
@harrydautovic97592 жыл бұрын
The people that suggested that the yellow monaro was at fault or at least partially, you're all wrong! It's legally parked as the road signage suggests...have a look people!!
@michaelbrazis2 жыл бұрын
Truck driver at fault, but between the Monaro and Micra drivers, this was an accident waiting to happen. What would happen if a fire truck needed to get through? Also just cause someone hits your car doesn't give you the right to walk all over the road.
@tom50516662 жыл бұрын
gee i dunno, guess they might.... move for the fire truck, a garbage truck is NOT an emergency vehicle and has no special privileges
@RennieAsh2 жыл бұрын
@@tom5051666 common sense courtesy >>> rigid rules
@brettjames90882 жыл бұрын
Not sure about that. The bloke underestimated the size of his vehicle, was travelling too fast and he crashed into a parked car. Pretty stupid.
@wazaagbreak-head60392 жыл бұрын
Am a firie, in situations like this we are told to just push the cars out of the way if it isn't going to jeopardise other motorists, tell the boss and it's their issue to sort out
@shinjisan20152 жыл бұрын
@@wazaagbreak-head6039 Garbage truck is not an emergency vehicle.
@risingphoenix012 жыл бұрын
The council has failed to leave more than 3 metres for parking near an unbroken line (See rule 208 of the Victorian Road Safety Road Rules 2017). However the truck driver was also negligent in his action of crossing over an unbroken line to pass the Monaro, he should have stopped and waited for all on coming traffic to pass before proceeding to the intersection.
@fisherfriendman2 жыл бұрын
There no space to stop in his lane without crossing the centreline.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The 3 metre rule only applies if the dividing line is continuous. There is a break in the dividing line which can be seen between the yellow and blue cars. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked.
@JamesAAshton2 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug no, the single small break isn't going to let yellow off here. The sign is no standing but the yellow car was in a no parking zone. You can see the unbroken line ends for the nearby marked parking spaces.
@brettwatson-will33882 жыл бұрын
Hat's off to the Dash Cam car managing to record the whole incident... Talk about right place right time!
@rickeyeversen44202 жыл бұрын
The council of the area is at fault for allowing parking on such narrow streets
@MelbourneGarbo.2 жыл бұрын
Not a council truck nor is it even Melbourne council
@awestruck90752 жыл бұрын
Why do councils allow narrow streets? It's their greed.
@rickeyeversen44202 жыл бұрын
@@MelbourneGarbo. don’t it say tight MELBOURNE street so it’s Melbourne council decision to allow parking on them narrow roads
@MelbourneGarbo.2 жыл бұрын
@@rickeyeversen4420 plenty of councils within in the Melbourne metro area. This is Glen Eira council
@awestruck90752 жыл бұрын
@@BadDriversOz the new suburbs are worse, so that's a lame excuse.
@cammiller76212 жыл бұрын
Truck is at fault, and council need to move the "no standing" sign back from the round about
@Ausmerica2 жыл бұрын
yes truck driver is at fault so is the Manaro driver. regardless of what and where the sign is, he is illegally parked, his parked less than 2.5 meters from an unbroken line...Check the rule book regarding this.
@ianfranzke31912 жыл бұрын
@@Ausmerica The law is 3m
@kevinmartin25162 жыл бұрын
Don't be silly, the council will have to spend some money, putting up a new pole!
@suelynch2 жыл бұрын
The truck is at fault. The Monaro was stationary on the side of the road. The Monaro was parked/stationary within the designated lines. The truck should have stopped and waited for the blue and silver cars to backup on the opposite side of the road to move before continuing to the roundabout.
@arendeepropertymaintenance2 жыл бұрын
Both cars illegally parked. Can't park next to a solid white line, or 20 metres from an intersection entry. 10m on exit.
@moneybag75592 жыл бұрын
@@arendeepropertymaintenance Theres quite clearly a no standing sign before the roundabout, which the Monaro is parked before. The truck is at fault, but thats why its called an "accident". Roads too tight, cars parked both sides, shit happens share details and move on.
@einfelder82622 жыл бұрын
Monaro parked illegally. Parking spots clearly marked in the street behind it. However, truck driver has no right to hit even an illegally parked vehicle.
@traj71962 жыл бұрын
@@arendeepropertymaintenance "both"? What other car makes up "both"?
@Creedstarsrr2 жыл бұрын
All car's were illegally parked and those 2 car's on the other side of the road no one was in them
@claudiadouglasx2 жыл бұрын
Truck 100% the fact there’s oncoming traffic and the truck is still trying to push his way through was silly 🙃
@iDrive1232 жыл бұрын
Got a job to do.
@wade46992 жыл бұрын
Typical truck driving flog
@iDrive1232 жыл бұрын
@@wade4699 Flog or not, he’s still got a job to do. Get rid of your own garbage and the trucks are gone
@bobsieschannel2 жыл бұрын
@@iDrive123 Most garbo drivers are flogs , but i suppose they hire rubbish to collect rubbish
@Moloko_Synthemesc2 жыл бұрын
@@iDrive123 but is hanging back for a few seconds to let a car or two through really that much of a problem? I don't see why the bin truck drivers gotta be in such a rush all the time. The traffic is a pain the arse but still, being patient sometimes has gotta be better than ending up on youtube getting blamed for a prang 😆
@Istoleurpancake2 жыл бұрын
Truck should have waited for the blue car to move over to the side of the road more before driving through
@tippo53412 жыл бұрын
Garbo had plenty of room...still could've been a good foot to his right and missed not only the blue car but also the Monaro...blue car had and was no part in this accident...albeit for being there and being the point of discussion of many posts...garbo's fault soley (amidst other Council related issues but can't do sh*t about that so it shouldn't really be a discussion topic) for driving through there like an impatient entitled di*k and not paying careful enough attention to the situation at hand, or clearly the size of the truck.
@Nutsaur2 жыл бұрын
Luckily a company caused the damage. Companies have money.
@tippo53412 жыл бұрын
@@Nutsaur 😂😂😂😂😂😂 love it
@WinzoIsAEpicFail2 жыл бұрын
Hits the tree when pulling over too. One of those days...
@rotarpowered66652 жыл бұрын
Poor choice to park your car there considering it's legal or not, because well this video sums it up
@knifethrower97332 жыл бұрын
Oh that poor Monaro 🥺 must've been worth a fortune before the truck hit it 🤦
@MetalSnakers2 жыл бұрын
I guess 30k is a fortune to some people. They share too many parts with a commodore to become worth 'a fortune'
@gazzafloss2 жыл бұрын
When I got my licence, a long time back now, I recall a law that says you must not park parallel within 12 ft, (approx 4 metres), of an unbroken centreline. Is that still a thing? Sad about the Monaro.
@jasonderp59332 жыл бұрын
You must not park within 20m of an intersection with traffic lights, unless a sign says you can. You must not park within 10m of an intersection without traffic lights, unless: a sign says you can
@olgadw47302 жыл бұрын
Monaro was in a designated park and not moving.
@justincondello2 жыл бұрын
Usually, 10 meters is about the end of the solid white line from the intersection
@gazzafloss2 жыл бұрын
@@justincondello like I said, long time, 56 years and also New South Wales. From looking at the clip I don't think I'd be parking my valuable car in that position be it lawful or not. It has been said, "It's not who's in the right that counts, it's what's left after the incident/accident". The trucker was careless in his run through but it's not his truck that'll need repairs.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
@@jasonderp5933 The rule is you can't stop within 10 metres of an uncontrolled intersection. Yellow car was outside the 10 metres. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked.
@HankJr.2 жыл бұрын
I love that he then goes and hits a tree as he’s pulling over lol
@jeremysun73652 жыл бұрын
probably just the branches
@firstname4052 жыл бұрын
@@jeremysun7365 exactly, goes and hits a tree
@allanmanley63402 жыл бұрын
The truck is at fault. He should have waited till there was enough room for him to clear the vehicle - he could even have "tapped" his hooter (horn) to ask the car to move to a safer place......
@mymaster1122 жыл бұрын
That doesn't seem like a street that would be safe to park on, so thin.
@SagebrushRambles2 жыл бұрын
The word you're searching in vain for is "narrow."
@rocktekmetalworker2 жыл бұрын
Councils need to start conceding half the width of their oh-so-precious nature strips in these tight streets. Indented parking spaces should be required and paid for by any new sub-dividers and developers. Im sure they can do it without the need to remove trees as well.
@Smithy22222 жыл бұрын
Lmao that title, should be "Garbage Truck Hits Parked Monaro" not sure how the driver of the blue car couldn't read the situation and move closer to the kerb though, oblivious.
@Luscious31742 жыл бұрын
The Monaro was already in the lane (regardless if it is parked or moving) with the truck doing an overtake where there wasn't enough room. 100% garbo at fault.
@jimethota2 жыл бұрын
One thing I don't miss about living in an Australian city is every single suburban street has 3000 cars parked on the side turning the street into a one lane road.
@jeremysun73652 жыл бұрын
and one thing I don't miss living else where is that I spend 20 minutes driving and then 30 minutes to look up a carpark which is another 20 minutes walking to the building want to visit.
@dan00000232 жыл бұрын
Who cares who’s “technically” at fault? Would I park my Monaro there? Hell no, because my brain functions and I would look at that spot and go, looks like a prime spot to get hit. But each to their own🤷🏻♂️
@mortxiii2 жыл бұрын
I guess everyone missed the fact the garbage truck then stopped when it HIT THE TREE on the other side of the roundabout - methinks maybe someone was driving while distracted
@MarkJohnson-wb2ef2 жыл бұрын
The council and the state and federal government's is at fault for building tiny roads, tiny carparks and never using any foresight when it comes to construction or water management.
@user-pn4py6vr4n2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. If you want to build streets that narrow, there should be no on street parking, at all.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
Sure - all this was planned by the governments!
@MarkJohnson-wb2ef2 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug the allocation of roads and infrastructures? Yes, they are decided by a combination of state, federal government along with local council. They don't grow out of the ground lol
@jurassicchrist2 жыл бұрын
This would be considered a wide street in a lot of London🤣
@psivewri2 жыл бұрын
They may've been legally parked but man that is tight with a car on either side on a fairly busy street.
@traj71962 жыл бұрын
The car on the other side isn't parked, just stopped. And it's stopped too far to the right
@yetzt2 жыл бұрын
no worries, some eucalyptus oil and it will rub out.
@fernhausluv442 жыл бұрын
Truck's fault for underestimating distance and width of vehicle/s. Better course of action would have been to alert driver to park more closely to side or move ahead.
@Vakushka2 жыл бұрын
What an amazing accomplishment for the council who approved that street, and whoever handed over the licence.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The Council members who approved that street probably all died over 130 years ago - motor vehicles were not a consideration
@Smithy22222 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug more whoever allowed parking on both sides
@benaxb2 жыл бұрын
The Truckie was definately at fault. He should not have proceeded when clearly he knew he didn't have the room to pass.
@jpHouse2 жыл бұрын
As someone from moved from Australia to Japan, a country where in the city I now live in has a population FAR more than ALL of Australia. The problem isn't narrow roads.
@Matt_Alaric2 жыл бұрын
The problem is narrow roads. Not sure why you think your house move is relevant to that.
@jpHouse2 жыл бұрын
@@Matt_Alaric have you seen the avg width of. Japanese road? Do you know the avg density in city areas? There is less room and more people. Yet this sort of occurrence is far less common. So it's not the roads that are the problem. My house move was only mentioned for validity to my claim, as I've seen it first hand both ways.
@Humannn8ss82 жыл бұрын
@@jpHouse it’s the parked cars on the road that’s the problem
@Matt_Alaric2 жыл бұрын
@@jpHouse It's an anecdote, nothing more, with all that carries. Of course the small roads are the issue, the truckie had barely any spare room either side of him which massively increases the chance of scraping a vehicle.
@jpHouse2 жыл бұрын
@@Matt_Alaric smaller truck. One side parking/no street parking. 1 way road. Just to name a few things that could drastically reduce the chance of this occurring. All without changing the width of the road.
@eduvids59632 жыл бұрын
Getting hit by a rubbish truck is exactly why we got dashcams for each of our cars. Rubbish company washed their hands of it and tried to contest it 12 months later. I ended up liaising with the insurer's legal rep, who said that this particular company Clean***y does this all the time.
@michaelreid23292 жыл бұрын
Well, it seems to me that if council permitted parking on the street and the garbo truck was permitted to operate a truck of that size and GVM, then the council has some responsibility in that matter for the service it supplies. Of course the collection firm may need to acquire vehicles more relevant to the requirements in which they operate.
@JamesAAshton2 жыл бұрын
The yellow car was illegally parked. Unbroken dividing lines mean there needs to be at least 3 metres space between them and a parked car. Notice the line stops near the nearby marked parking spots. Doesn't entirely let the truck off though.
@davidreeves29112 жыл бұрын
going to get hate, but the blue car failed to give way (entered section of road when not clear to do so), truck driver had a choice to either hit blue car that he knew had a occupant, or hit a parked car usually unoccupied. yellow car illegally parked, fail to keep 3 meres from barrier line. truck driver traveling to fast for that section of road. council failed to mark road and place signage in compliance with ARR in an unambiguous manner.
@jwnomad2 жыл бұрын
Definitely council at fault for allowing parking on both sides when there isn't room for that
@just_passing_through2 жыл бұрын
There’s a solid line in the middle of the road, so you aren’t allowed to park there.
@tommygun8012 жыл бұрын
@@just_passing_through That is not a law in any state.
@just_passing_through2 жыл бұрын
@@tommygun801 You must not stop or park in an intersection. You must not stop or park on a road within 20 metres from the nearest point of an intersecting road. The lines merely indicate the intersection. The law states you can’t park at an intersection. So, take it for granted, wherever you see the lines indicating the intersection, you can’t park there.
@traj71962 жыл бұрын
@@just_passing_through it's 20m from a controlled intersection. 10m from uncontrolled. 3m from a solid dividing line UNLESS there are parking control signs and other information. Monaro was legally parked
@just_passing_through2 жыл бұрын
@@traj7196 Still, that Monaro news too close to the intersection, whatever metric you use.
@darrensmith94072 жыл бұрын
The truck driver thought the yellow monaro was a recycling bin...you should see what he does to "non-recycling" bins!
@ylilycam2 жыл бұрын
Driving a dirty big through tight streets ain't my cup o tea and I always give truckers plenty of respect but I just can't help but think that this bloke was being just a little complacent.....hindsights a beautiful thing, if he was going a little slower and eyed the driver of the blue car I'm sure he'd have moved over for the truck....Bugger! lesson learned either way
@ylilycam2 жыл бұрын
@Aqua Fyre Why?
@ylilycam2 жыл бұрын
@Aqua Fyre So I've said I have respect for truckers....that the street is tight....that the trucker was driving a little too fast...that it's easy to comment after the fact...that he should've looked at his surroundings a little more carefully and that he'll learn from his mistake.....Your drunk boofhead
@saijenalexander2 жыл бұрын
Well I don't know about anyone else but I sure as hell wouldn't be parking a Monaro on that street, especially right in front of the roundabout.
@SaruW7772 жыл бұрын
It's the roundabout in Bentleigh East, VIC 3165 100% the truck's fault. Streets are always narrow with parking cars in that area. An experienced garbage truck driver should have handle that easily. However, there has been a shortage of garbage truck driver for more than a year now. That Monash Council had made apologies multiple times for missing the garbage collection day. Perhaps because of that, SOLO's truck drivers driving manner has become increasingly aggressive and very different from pre-pandemic. They are so rush to collect the next bin in front of them nowadays, and don't care about other drivers, even incoming traffic in a narrow street like this. They never give ways. I have had a few near misses from these SOLO drivers. The truck should have stopped and let the blue car go first. So yeah, no surprise of this video.
@maxregal88892 жыл бұрын
To summarise, 1/3 of commenters think the Monaro driver is at fault. 1/3 think the council, (Glen Eira in Melbourne), is at fault for having such a narrow road, and 1/3 aren’t complete jolly idiots and can see that the only person at fault is the truck driver.
@constantinosmallios2 жыл бұрын
It was 100% the truck driver's fault. The Monaro was legally parked, and the truck driver took a risk by trying to fit through the gap.
@Earthneedsado-over1772 жыл бұрын
He really enjoyed his legal parking. You wouldn't catch me parking in a spot like that.
@Ausmerica2 жыл бұрын
You want to go back and read your road rules, regardless what the sign says, road markings have meaning too. The Monaro was actually illegally parked, you can't not park less than 2.5 meters from an unbroken line. It's the truck drivers fault for going a tad quick, but the Monaro would not of been hit if he parked legally and remembered ALL his road rules.
@Ausmerica2 жыл бұрын
@@Earthneedsado-over177 He wasn't legally parked, I can't understand how you worked it out. It's regardless of what the street sign says, you also need to observe road markings too which so many people fail to observe and notice. Go back to your rule book and you will see, that YOU CAN NOT park less than 2.5 meters from an unbroken line.
@brycemontero24132 жыл бұрын
🤯🤯 directly outside my house and I didn’t even hear it!?
@hasenpfefer72 жыл бұрын
Clearly a nearby cyclist aggravated the truck causing it to take its anger on a yellow monaro and a tree
@sofascialistadankulamegado17812 жыл бұрын
Those streets are just stupid. Town planning failure. Shameful.
@WaxedMerkin2 жыл бұрын
You just cant hit a stationary vehicle. so it doesn't matter if the cars are legally parked or not.
@crocodile20062 жыл бұрын
Try parking your car in the middle of the freeway at night... and let me know when you court date is so I can come hear you explain that to the judge
@joshgardner28312 жыл бұрын
Not correct, if you hit a parked car that is illegally parked, the parked vehicle is at fault because they shouldn’t be parked there!
@The_Last_Ninja2 жыл бұрын
@@joshgardner2831 He’s legally parked though?? Check time 0:50 and look at the sign
@lexacutable2 жыл бұрын
@@crocodile2006 stop using completely different circumstances to illustrate something irrelevant, obviously there are exceptions but they don't apply here
@QuantumW2 жыл бұрын
@@lexacutable starting to think crocodile might be the truckwit in video
@hedonismunderstands24692 жыл бұрын
the blue car is nowhere near the kerb and yet the garbo ploughed through, and there are comments giving the monaro shit??
@gigioz742 жыл бұрын
That blue car should've moved over as close to the curb as possible to allow a truck to go through. But despite all the elements that made this truck drivers job much harder (narrow street, parked vehicles on both sides, stopped traffic not over far enough to allow the truck plenty of room), he should've stopped, told the blue car to move over more, then proceed.
@RACGump2 жыл бұрын
You can 13 other people are terrible drivers if thats what you believe. The blue car did nothing wrong, they were driving, in their lane, and only had to stop because the truck passed over into their lane. If YOUR lane is obstructed, then YOU have to give way to all other traffic before crossing into other lanes to move on.
@gigioz742 жыл бұрын
@@RACGump You do realise the blue car and silver car would've had to drive into the middle of the road to do exactly the same thing as the truck....that is to partially drive on the other side of the road to get around the parked ute they stopped behind. So their side was just as obstructed by parked vehicles.
@stevejohnston51912 жыл бұрын
So, you’re asking if the fault lies with the stationary Monaro or the moving garbage truck? Okaaaaaaaay …
@benhazell78382 жыл бұрын
Why would you ask who is at fault? Your obligation as a driver is to avoid a collision if where possible
@crocodile20062 жыл бұрын
Isn't it an obligation as a driver not to basically park your car on the round-a-bout though?
@leonkernan2 жыл бұрын
@@crocodile2006 He was clear of the no standing sign
@benhazell78382 жыл бұрын
@@crocodile2006 You're one of them hey
@The_Last_Ninja2 жыл бұрын
@@crocodile2006 Come on, he’s legally parked. Open your eyes…
@oggyoggy12992 жыл бұрын
@@crocodile2006 There’s something wrong with you. Hand in your licence.
@creditelectric2 жыл бұрын
Bentleigh, those 1950's streets look narrow & round abouts were rare & cars have become wider particularly since the 90's.
@petermckay2 жыл бұрын
And he hit the tree when he stopped
@jamesr57412 жыл бұрын
Might is always right. Add some wheel spikes and that garbage truck would be perfect for Mad Max.
@rallylout2 жыл бұрын
Garbo … and he hits the tree 😂
@aaronleverton42212 жыл бұрын
Obviously I'm not up on the current state of play, because the Monaro certainly looks illegally parked to me, if you look at the road markings. However, there's a sign to contradict this. When I did my licence an unbroken line leading back from a stop or give way sign at an intersection indicated a no-parking zone for the length of that line. Has that changed
@derekhobbs11022 жыл бұрын
Sign shouldn't be there then.
@aaronleverton42212 жыл бұрын
@@hayloft3834 I was referring to the line that is part of/leads back from the painted traffic island. However, I can see how the line would be regarded as being broken as it is essentially two parts of the same. Last time I did an online practice test I got 97%, but obviously there are some updates I need to look at.
@Ess_Chalk2 жыл бұрын
I reckon neither took reasonable care and precaution - both are at fault. The Monaro stopped in a spot that makes it extremely difficult for the truck and the truck probably could have made it through if they were going a bit slower and a bit over to the other side.
@traj71962 жыл бұрын
Where the monaro parked was perfectly fine. Where the blue car stopped is the problem
@Ess_Chalk2 жыл бұрын
@@traj7196 I think it's the other way round - the Monaro stopped right in front of an open parking space and it looks like there is someone in the blue car, in the middle of their lane probably because they're waiting to go around the black ute.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
@@Ess_Chalk The yellow car stopped in its own legal parking space. What other spaces were available are irrelevant
@HAGGYKODU2 жыл бұрын
Lmao didn’t notice the first time I watched but the truck got caught on a tree
@Cliffy16162 жыл бұрын
I’d say the Truck driver since there’s nothing wrong with where the Monaro is parked and the moving Vehicle is usually at fault. How ever that Blue Nissan Micra that’s sitting about 10miles off of the curb and could have moved over an extra foot or two to give the truck a bit more space certainly didn’t help.
@JamesAAshton2 жыл бұрын
You can't park without leaving at least 3m space to an unbroken dividing line.
@Cliffy16162 жыл бұрын
@@JamesAAshton doesn’t matter Monaro was stationary and parked. The truck stupidly decided to try and cram through completely on the truck driver. He could have just as easily waited and asked the Monaro to move the driver was right there. So even if the Monaro was parked wrong it’s still the truck drivers fault.
@fgcp29642 жыл бұрын
I would blame whoever erected the parking signs. That is way too close to the roundabout. Madness.
@tommygun8012 жыл бұрын
Its Actually not. Sign is exactly 10m from the beginning of the intersection which is the minimum distance your allowed to park to an intersection without traffic lights.
@fgcp29642 жыл бұрын
@@tommygun801 it actually is. Regardless of the regulations, there's not enough room. It's poorly designed.
@tommygun8012 жыл бұрын
@@fgcp2964 poor design yes but it's not the people who erected the signs fault because they are following the legislation.
@jiglife26332 жыл бұрын
Truck for sure!!
@EatMyShortsAU2 жыл бұрын
I like how the how video is just this clip. Pure gold.
@C4RV32 жыл бұрын
It's a tough gig driving something that size through these streets. The law states that you must leave 3 meters clearance. The truck is about 2.5m wide. Monaro parked legally, not at fault. Blue car failed to leave 3m clearance, partially to blame. Truck driver mostly to blame unfortunately. Probably very tired and frustrated (no excuse tho).
@stevie-ray20202 жыл бұрын
Agree with you there! Those Micra drivers are almost as bad as Camry drivers!
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
Blue car is not parked (it was waiting for the truck to pass) so 3 metre rule doesn't apply
@C4RV32 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug not parked, but certainly stopped. Not sure on the legal difference.
@C4RV32 жыл бұрын
@@dynevor6327 if the blue car had better awareness they could have easily given the truck more room. Truck driver still at fault but I can tell you we get frustrated when cars leave insufficient room, especially when it is clearly there. If I was driving that truck, I would have stopped, blocked the road and waited for the blue car to move over. Truck driver got impatient and fucked up.
@C4RV32 жыл бұрын
@@dynevor6327 you're missing my point. I'm not saying the truck driver wasn't at fault. Clearly he was. I'm saying that the blue car saw him coming, could have easily given him more room but didn't. Some other things of note in this incident are as follows. This is a dual control truck. The driver was sitting in the right seat and that tells me a few things. Either he was just starting a run or just finishing a run, especially if that time mark is accurate. And when on a run in those narrow streets would usually be driven from the left seat. It was probably a situation he could have avoided if he was in the more familiar left seat. No excuse. You just can't drive these big things like that, but you're driving a car and see an incident like this about to happen, leave as much room as you can. And maybe everyone will avoid making it a bad day
@HomeDistiller2 жыл бұрын
Unless otherwise signed it's illegal to park within 3mtrs of a solid single or double dividing line, so all the cars are parked illegally (I think, I can't quite see what the sign the 2 door taxi is parked behind is) but as there was someone in the car and it seems the ignition was on (due to the brake lights showing) I don't think he was technically parked so that would mean the truck overtook illegally.. But in saying all this even if the Holden was parked illegally the truck would still be at fault as he did nothing to prevent the crash, so the car owner would cop a parking ticket and the truck driver the cost of the crash
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The 3 metre rule only applies if the dividing line is continuous. There is a break in the dividing line which can be seen between the yellow and blue cars. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked. You can be parked with driver sitting in the car.
@gerardroll64682 жыл бұрын
I’m voting for the truck driver. He could’ve & should’ve waited for the other oncoming cars to pass before trying to squeeze through such a narrow gap with a vehicle that size.
@sumchatoe2 жыл бұрын
Well clearly Monaro is parked next to continuous line without leaving enough distance between the line and the car for the other road users to pass safely, there for Monaro was parked illegally. In saying that, truck driver did not show enough due care to stop or slow down to a minimum speed so secondarily at fault as well.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The 3 metre rule only applies if the dividing line is continuous. There is a break in the dividing line which can be seen between the yellow and blue cars. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked.
@sumchatoe2 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug at least half of Monaro is parked next to continuous line, that still equals to illegal parking, no standing zone sign hasn't got much to do with it in this instance.
@peabow10312 жыл бұрын
Should've been parked there in the first place so close to an intersection got to love them council rules.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The rule is you can't stop within 10 metres of an uncontrolled intersection. Yellow car was outside the 10 metres. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked.
@Bysentenial2 жыл бұрын
How is this entire street not no parking?
@tippo53412 жыл бұрын
The driver of the blue car had every right to be where they were...looked to be waiting for the garbo to come through and had moved left as far as practicably was available. Old mate in the garbage truck could have taken the path past the Munro rather slower (or stopped), and a bit straighter well beyond the Munro, instead of cutting it so close...that said old mate in the Munro could have parked further back from the No Stopping/Standing sign (looked to be a good car length behind him at least and nfi if something might've been parked there prior)...but he was a bee's dick off the kerb, so did the best he could to get as far left as possible. For mine...and being a truck driver...was pretty reckless actions of the garbo to go through there as he did...and he'd likely cop blame from the Police and Insurance co. on that basis. He could have avoided that situation quite easily instead of being in a hurry to either tip off...or get to the next street to get the quota of bins plus some...smh!!! And the parking restrictions should also have been placed well back further from the roundabout as well, and street parking limited to one side...shame Council shame!!!!!
@davidreeves29112 жыл бұрын
take a close look, the truck is braking before the car bonnet dips, as the blue car brakes, cant see clearly but looks like blue car enters the road after the truck has already straddled centre line. but yes the truck is way too fast for a street that size and will cop 100% of the blame as truck drivers always do. That's why so many good drivers are walking away.
@Ausmerica2 жыл бұрын
I agree to most of what you say here regarding how the Garbo driver went through, he could of went a tad slower and would of missed it. Regardless of the sign, we do have line markings, that marking is classified as Unbroken line. one can't park or stop less than 2.5 meters from an unbroken line. Even that Blue Ford ute is illegally parked. I too am a truck driver of over 35 years, and come across this way to often some cases I can't even go up the street, and that's when both the council and the Police are called in to take action, as the clock is ticking.
@swinetrek2 жыл бұрын
WTF is a Munro?
@tippo53412 жыл бұрын
@@swinetrek old school talk for Monaro...real old school
@tippo53412 жыл бұрын
@@Ausmerica yup agreed, and with the ever much cramming of property into new developments, the roads and streets become more tracks than anything else, where you're lucky to squeeze much more than largest of 4wd's through...ridiculous
@Taizunx2 жыл бұрын
I was not expecting the guy coming out of that car to be so short... lol
@zoomosis2 жыл бұрын
Everyone saying the Monaro is illegally parked must be watching another video. But it's also irrelevant since the rubbish truck driver still needs to avoid hitting stationary cars. It's pretty clear they just went for a gap that wasn't wide enough. Crash was approx outside 5 Joy Street, East Bentleigh (VIC) if anyone wants to visit it on Street View. It just a typical pre-war Melbourne suburban street and not an especially narrow one.
@Rotbeam992 жыл бұрын
Even if he was stopped in a no stopping zone (he wasn't), this does not then permit you to plow through them like they are not there. Duh.
@Rotbeam992 жыл бұрын
@SaltyBrains Nope.
@Rotbeam992 жыл бұрын
@SaltyBrains no
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
@SaltyBrains Yellow car was legally parked
@Species15712 жыл бұрын
I'm sure if the yellow car driver had really applied himself, he could have found an even more stupid place to park than right on the narrow approach to a roundabout.
@mpk332 жыл бұрын
It's a Holden...it'll buff right out...down at the scrap yard. 😅
@franciscoman222 жыл бұрын
The government is at fault. Clearly such a small street can't be two ways
@michielvoetberg46342 жыл бұрын
It can be. But it can't have on street parking. Ban car parking there and the street is incredibly wide. Too wide in fact, so you can then add a cycle lane
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The government form 1870 is at fault!
@franciscoman222 жыл бұрын
@@dynevor6327 I didn't
@franciscoman222 жыл бұрын
@@hayloft3834 No, I am blaming the governments, from the one that decided that street should be two ways to all the others that didn't fix the problem
@sitm2 жыл бұрын
I thought you couldn't park on a solid white line and if a broken line needed two meters clearance, I don't know what the legal definition of parked is if he's in the car with the engine running is that legally parked or standing in Victoria?
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
The rule is there needs to be 3 metres between a parked vehicle and a continuous dividing line. However, there is a break in the dividing line which can be seen between the yellow and blue cars. Also, there is a No Standing sign just ahead of where the car was parked - which legitimises the location where the yellow car was legally parked.
@sitm2 жыл бұрын
Cheers
@kaytiecakes2 жыл бұрын
Both parties should be arguing with the council about parking on such a busy narrow street. However, the truck should have waited behind the Holden he would have been fine. Either the Holden would move through or the traffic going the other direction would clear up.
@tippo53412 жыл бұрын
Was nothing to really wait for...garbo should've just been a few seconds more patient and he would've got through there no probs...had a mile of room to his right...and yes...the whole parking thing seems a valid issue here i.e. parking sign so close to roundabout, parking on both sides of a narrow street etc etc...but in this case it is what it is...garbo should not have been in such a rush...plain n simple, drive to the conditions...he didn't.
@dirtyfox50602 жыл бұрын
Both parties need to send the bill of repair to council.The brake lights on the holden only came on after the hit, the holden was parked right on the edge of the no standing zone, if the holden was parked 2 metres back from the sign the garbo would have had the room to swing back into his lane. Also if the nissan and the car behind it, could of given the garbo more room this wouldn't have happened. Everyone needs to have common sense and courtesy.
@AnotherDoug2 жыл бұрын
@@dirtyfox5060 It is irrelevant how much parking space was, or was not, available behind the yellow car
@dirtyfox50602 жыл бұрын
@@AnotherDoug actually it is, there is an island before the roundabout. To avoid driving over the island, the garbo was moving back into his lane when he hit the holden. If the holden was back from the sign, this wouldn't have happened. I'm not saying the holden is in the wrong, I'm looking at how this could of been avoided all together.