Gaussian Integral 3 Differentiation

  Рет қаралды 18,141

Dr Peyam

Dr Peyam

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер
@shiina_mahiru_9067
@shiina_mahiru_9067 5 жыл бұрын
The light turns off --> (sound of some sleeping gases) --> Peyam falls down --> the story of the Gaussian Integral and Dr. Peyam . . . . . . to be continued
@MrCigarro50
@MrCigarro50 5 жыл бұрын
Esta serie es simplemente fascinante...Gracias Dr. Peyam.
@waterfirecards5128
@waterfirecards5128 5 жыл бұрын
In 6:30 how did you get from the first line to the second? And how can you just take away the d/dt away from the integral?
@alichowdhury3502
@alichowdhury3502 5 жыл бұрын
Notice derivative of first line is second line. It is effectively doing the partial derivative with respect to t.
@waterfirecards5128
@waterfirecards5128 5 жыл бұрын
Ali Chowdhury yes but then how did he just move out the d/dt away from the integral?
@alichowdhury3502
@alichowdhury3502 5 жыл бұрын
WaterFireCARDS by Leibniz Theorem. So he took the partial derivative with respect to t and the took out the derivative.
@rajatkhandelwal7276
@rajatkhandelwal7276 5 жыл бұрын
Sir plz change the angle of the camera.
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 жыл бұрын
Ok
@cheshstyles
@cheshstyles 5 жыл бұрын
@@drpeyam from ~peyam over 6 to ~peyam over 3 Still love your videos tho!
@michelkhoury1470
@michelkhoury1470 5 жыл бұрын
Very nice solution... I solved this famous integral using gamma function.
@mihaipuiu6231
@mihaipuiu6231 4 жыл бұрын
I like very much Dr. Peyam , because ...1.He knows Math., and 2. He has a lot of charisma. Good for You!
@Rundas69420
@Rundas69420 5 жыл бұрын
The best way of calculating integrals: Go in the opposite direction xD. Now I wonder whether you can find derivatives using integrals. Would be fun though. For some people at the university where I study maths, saying something like "plugging in t=infinity" would be considered some kind of mathematical mutilation. Germans can be weird sometimes :D.
@Xrelent
@Xrelent 5 жыл бұрын
You should check out FlammableMaths. He does a lot of Feyman integration :)
@Rundas69420
@Rundas69420 5 жыл бұрын
@@Xrelent I already know this boi and his nice videos. Thanks for the recommendation anyways man :D
@ashwinvishwakarma2531
@ashwinvishwakarma2531 5 жыл бұрын
kind of hard to see the board from this perspective
@kqp1998gyy
@kqp1998gyy 4 жыл бұрын
I suggest to use the left side only and flip between the inner and outer board.
@srpenguinbr
@srpenguinbr 5 жыл бұрын
Very neat solution!. When I saw the title, I had the idea of using Feynman integration with a(t)=int from 0 to inf of e^-ax^2dx if you differentiate and solve the separable diff eq (a'(t) can be expressed in terms of a(t)), you can easily get an explicit expression in terms of t. However, I wasn't able to think of a nice value of t to plug in as an attempt to solve for the constant. So I think it does not work
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 жыл бұрын
Next video :)
@holyshit922
@holyshit922 2 жыл бұрын
Infact he used Leibniz rule in reverse
@lakhdarhaouassi4948
@lakhdarhaouassi4948 5 жыл бұрын
13 minutes sont inoubliable. merci
@paulbooer7171
@paulbooer7171 5 жыл бұрын
Really interesting. I may have to watch it 5 times before I get it. It is like magic.
@michelkhoury1470
@michelkhoury1470 5 жыл бұрын
But I think we use Lebesgue theorem not because integral of 0 is not necessary 0 but because to switch limit and integral sign
@patricksalhany8787
@patricksalhany8787 5 жыл бұрын
Yeah, to justify that lim(integral)=integral(lim).
@TieJote
@TieJote 5 жыл бұрын
Thats what he said, dominate convergence theorem. Now i am not sure if lebesgue theorem is an alternate name, but Peyam said correctly what theorem he used.
@patricksalhany8787
@patricksalhany8787 5 жыл бұрын
It is called dominated convergence theorem, or Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem.
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 жыл бұрын
Yep, that’s what I meant
@michelkhoury1470
@michelkhoury1470 5 жыл бұрын
@@TieJote yes you're right they are the same
@sugarfrosted2005
@sugarfrosted2005 5 жыл бұрын
I legitimately thought to ask if you were using his notes.
@liyi-hua2111
@liyi-hua2111 5 жыл бұрын
9:58 If you let t equals to zero then the second integral will not be exist since you have divided by t in your calculation. Or should this method be presented as lim-to-infinity form to be more specific
@TheGeneralThings
@TheGeneralThings 5 жыл бұрын
From 12:54 onwards, my jaw dropped to the floor. That was so satisfying to watch!
@michaelbaum6796
@michaelbaum6796 Жыл бұрын
Nice solution👍
@adityavarshney7189
@adityavarshney7189 5 жыл бұрын
The betrayal at 3:30 when he says he's gonna use u-sub but instead uses y xD
@MathematicIsFun
@MathematicIsFun 5 жыл бұрын
The board is impossibly small and invisible on the right. Can you please change the angle of your camera?
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 жыл бұрын
Ok
@xy9439
@xy9439 5 жыл бұрын
This was the way I was shown in class for the first time actually
@GoravKumar-cm5dz
@GoravKumar-cm5dz 5 жыл бұрын
Dear sir 1+2+3+4+5+6+7=-1/12 how please expand
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 жыл бұрын
Outrageous divergent series kzbin.info/www/bejne/bITYl5ZodsSFe8k
@boukharroubamediane119
@boukharroubamediane119 4 жыл бұрын
Wonderfully solved by calculus😊👍. The perspective shooting is convenient too👍
@YOUSIFPOTATOYT0
@YOUSIFPOTATOYT0 5 жыл бұрын
Can you make the camera nearer to the white board next time
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 жыл бұрын
Ok
@jacoboribilik3253
@jacoboribilik3253 3 жыл бұрын
Holy cow, good proof
@wolframalpha8634
@wolframalpha8634 5 жыл бұрын
Hey!!Dr.Peyam!!
@PackSciences
@PackSciences 5 жыл бұрын
Didn't know that one, interesting 👍.
@juanjuan-mi4gi
@juanjuan-mi4gi 3 жыл бұрын
Integral e-x3 ?....
@orangeguy5463
@orangeguy5463 5 жыл бұрын
AMAZING! This is the first one that really blew my mind with its elegance. Great proof, thanks for sharing!
@shanmugasundaram9688
@shanmugasundaram9688 5 жыл бұрын
The very same method used to calculate the integral of sin x^2 from 0 to infinity.
@drpeyam
@drpeyam 5 жыл бұрын
Yes, I posted a video on that
@snejpu2508
@snejpu2508 5 жыл бұрын
press 5. : )
@maxwellsequation4887
@maxwellsequation4887 4 жыл бұрын
5
@catholic_zoomer_bro
@catholic_zoomer_bro 5 жыл бұрын
One Gaussian boi
@tehyonglip9203
@tehyonglip9203 5 жыл бұрын
Nice T-shirt
@Debg91
@Debg91 5 жыл бұрын
So far we have always ended up with the integral squared 🤔
@jibran8410
@jibran8410 5 жыл бұрын
weird flex but ok
@jonasdaverio9369
@jonasdaverio9369 5 жыл бұрын
I really like 60 fps
@shandyverdyo7688
@shandyverdyo7688 5 жыл бұрын
Wow.
@がつかくん
@がつかくん 5 жыл бұрын
:D
Gaussian Integral 4 Feynman way
8:05
Dr Peyam
Рет қаралды 35 М.
Imaginary derivative of x
22:48
Dr Peyam
Рет қаралды 106 М.
Integral of exp(-x^2) | MIT 18.02SC Multivariable Calculus, Fall 2010
9:34
MIT OpenCourseWare
Рет қаралды 729 М.
integral of sin(x)/x from 0 to inf by Feynman's Technique
22:44
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Vardi Integral
31:55
Dr Peyam
Рет қаралды 15 М.
Gaussian Integral 8 Original Way
24:21
Dr Peyam
Рет қаралды 10 М.
The Gaussian Integral
10:09
RandomMathsInc
Рет қаралды 672 М.
Aggvent Calendar Day 18
3:36
Andy Math
Рет қаралды 13 М.
the impossible integral of e^(-x^2) & the error function
12:52
blackpenredpen
Рет қаралды 507 М.
Reddit Integral
16:08
Dr Peyam
Рет қаралды 17 М.
Destroying the Gaussian Integral using Papa Leibniz and Feynman
15:43
Flammable Maths
Рет қаралды 169 М.
Gaussian Integral 10 Fourier Way
19:54
Dr Peyam
Рет қаралды 7 М.