GD&T Masterclass | Virtual condition and Resultant Condition

[@VigneshkumarRajasekaran]

I appreciate the clear and practical explanations in your videos.

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

I'm glad you liked it!

[@ricardocaballero6357]

One best ME channels out there shoutout for this one

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Thank you so much

[@Ranjityadav20018]

Keep sharing your valuable tips, learning a lot from you sir . Thanks ❤

[@mayankrohit3582]

Best teacher i ever seen

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Thank you!! Mayank

[@relaxing2443]

Very unique teaching way I ever seen ❤

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Thank you 😊

[@rameshdhawale3267]

Best teaching ❤

[@이종대-u1n]

Thank you very much for the clear video. Out Boundary = Diameter 21(MMC)+0.5(Position TOL)+0.5(Straightness TOL) In this case, Straightness TOL seems to be included in Position TOL, but I wonder why Straightness TOL is separated and added separately to Out Boundary.

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Hi, think in this way, that position TOL and straightness TOL both are geometric TOL, and both are not depended on each other. So, you don't need to include one with other. both are separated, So. you should always add them separately.

[@이종대-u1n]

Thank you for your reply.

[@abhishekyash6118]

Nice video brother. I was about to ask what's the use of calculating Outer boundary for hole, and you are already there 👌. That's why your videos are special. You never let us to have any doubts. Thank you 😊

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

♥️♥️

[@rudesback5013]

Definitely a video worth watching i have no doubt about it. You should do a topic on material selection, would be very interesting to see your take on it. Cheers man

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

I'm glad you liked the video! Material selection is definitely a topic I plan to cover.

[@rudesback5013]

​@@mastermechanicaldesign hinge selection would be interesting as well! Lots of video ideas! I'm sure you'll reach 100k subscribers soon!

[@jpnmehta]

Thank you very much for your each and every content that provides deep knowledge to engineering people. Please make video on one FEA process with example.

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Thank you so much!! FEA Yes in future.

[@jaypanchal1997]

Great !

[@chindampraveen3190]

Hello, sir. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I would like to request that you please make a playlist on Jigs and Fixture.

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Noted, I will make a playlist on jigs and fixtures.

[@rahulkumargupta9663]

Please also make video on checking method on geometry tolerance

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Sure!!

[@KunWu-ks3fj]

Hi, thank you Master Ayush for your great work to make all these perfect classes. I am a Chinese guy who was trying to learn GD&T from time to time and from many other channels but can not find a good learning material. It's your videos that gave me a clear, easy to get learning experience. Thank your so much. For the questions you listed in the PDF, my answers are: Problem 1 - OB = Φ22.08 mm, IB = Φ 21.88 mm. No VC and RC for this kind of geometric tolerance design. Problem 2 - Virtual Condition = Φ21.7 mm, Resultant Condition = Φ22.3 mm, not call OB/IB in this case. Am I right?

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Hey. thank you so much for your kind words. Problem 1- OB = MMC of pin 22 + (- 0.01) + Applicable Geometric tolerance (Position TOL 0.1) = 22.09 (Here circularity geometric tolerance does not consider, because this is a surface control) ID - LMC of pin (22-0.02) - POS TOL 0.1 = 21.88 mm Yes no VC and RC could be defined in this example. Problem 2 VC at MMC = MMC of hole (22-0.1) - POS TOL @ MMC 0.2 = 21.7 mm RC at MMC = LMC of hole (22+0.1) + POS TOL @ MMC 0.2 = 22.3 mm and yes in this case we doesnt define OB/IB

[@KunWu-ks3fj]

@@mastermechanicaldesign Thanks for your detailed answer.👍

[@DilipSingh-nv1ri]

Means When Modifier is given then OB or IB is Not required to calculate? Right.

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Yes, that's right. Or we can say in that case OB and IB become virtual conditions and resultant conditions.

[@DilipSingh-nv1ri]

​​@@mastermechanicaldesign Based on ASME Y14.5 2018 (Page No. 46 ) In Problem 2... RC must be 22.5(Including 0.2 of Bonus Tolerance). So Can you tell me it is right or wrong ? - I am writing After Looking of 2-3 Different Sources.

[@behikulo_TJ]

Can you cover Overhead Gantry Design?

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Yes sure

[@myargi]

Nice video. But, orientation take place in position tolerance, so you can not add the orentation tolerance like form.

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Could you leave time stamp?

[@HEMANTSHARMANEXUS]

Please make video on o ring quad ring and k ring etc

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Sure!!

[@tangamtamil]

Please tell us about datum planes

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Very soon

[@mayankrohit3582]

Sir ek video request he, kya aap tutorial kar sakte he, make a part drawing and assembly drawing using G D &T in detail

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Jarur banayege!!

[@vishalk9656]

Can you explain how to select shock absorber in the next videos

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Next video is MOI, but I will definitely explain shock absorber

[@manikantayerrapothu5292]

I would like to listen to simulation classes from you sir

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Maybe in future

[@PAy805]

✨✨

[@nguyenthoan7258]

heart heart

[@ImranShaikh-cn6wx]

Bro pls pls pls make a video on Datum Shift....And pls explain how the gauges will be used at RMB and MMB condition in detail.....I am frustrated in understanding this....pls reply or like my comment if u have got my comment so that I can know that u will surely come up with video

[@mastermechanicaldesign]

Yes definitely I'll make videos of datum shift. Don't worry!!