General Artificial Intelligence: Making sci-fi a reality | Darya Hvizdalova | TEDxTrencin

[@samuelkarlsson2748]

If AI doesn´t have human survival as a core goal, I´m at least hoping to be the primary attraction at the human zoo.

[@abhishekmangaraj]

Don't worry. That will never happen. AGI will be the best thing that will ever be created. And after that, the world would be a paradise.

[@joshuab2437]

@@abhishekmangaraj Or a dystopian wasteland.

[@RSEFX]

Before AI is developed on a massive, all-pervasive level, I'd think the developers and promoters of AI should spend at least an equal amount of time PRIOR TO this development, conducting major, in-depth studies of not only the potential dangers, but the solutions to those dangers and air their findings in public alongside their "primrose path" promotions of AI---like the warnings on medicine packaging that discuss in detail the potential side effects. And, even more importantly, they should develop a comprehensive plan in great detail talking about what exact new jobs will be created across the board, from people who will have, say, zero interest in pursuing a life in technology, laborers, the less educated (and even non-teachable people who simply will not have the aptitude for this "information age" work) etc and present this to the public before everyone jumps in with both feet into this AI-AGE. Meaning, there should be a comprehensive plan to solve at least the bulk of the likely problems that will be the result of world-wide implementation of automated robots, and the general take over of jobs currently being done by actual living people.

[@jimj2683]

Do you think a narcissist like her cares? Her image is more important for her.

[@ChicagoBob123]

The fact that AI is driven to be an adaptable machine makes it completely different. Typically machines are designed to do a single task. An adaptable machine is more like you. These bots can make more bots and as they get smarter they will replace over 80% of the tasks we do now. No ONE is safe with AI. Doctors, Lawyers, Accountants, XRay technicians, nurses, soldiers, programmers. This wave is moving faster every day. IMO, the future can go one of two ways, dystopian or the Star Trek. We are on a ticking clock of less than 50 years.

[@skydivekrazy76]

It's hard for the human mind to see exponential growth... I'm fairly certain because of so many advancements that GI AI is likely less then 15 years away. At which point so many things will begin changing so quickly that humanity will in effect cease to exist. I guess something like that would be frightening to most... But I've always seen the unknown as a chance to grow and become better. Or it could lead to death... But that's gonna happen no matter what. so I may as well try to embrace what's coming and drive it in the direction I see as best for me and those around me.

[@JohnDoe-fz5cz]

ano T. you're wrong. AI is truly nothing more than a toaster. unless they can figure a way to go from riding a horse to space travel, that's all AI will ever be.

[@RSEFX]

The AI people always gloss over this whole "there will be new jobs" think without offering any solid plan. I want to see heavily-researched lists and a big-picture plan from their side in GREAT DETAIL, to convince us that it'll all work out. I feel that is their responsibility. For those who say "well, that can't be done/it's too complicated/that can't be predicted", I say, right there, that shows up the big danger, the hole in their thinking. I want to know what the problems will be and that a solution is at hand, and that they actually have one!

[@SakibSourav]

General purpose AI - this term is fascinating!

[@RSEFX]

The AI people never put forth a detailed plan and list all the new jobs that will be available not only for current levels of world population, but for that ever-growing one. It's like they say "everything will be great", but never address and provide detailed lists of the new jobs that will open up, how they will be implemented across the globe across the wide variety of cultures and levels of development. It certainly feels like they're simply putting their faith in "oh, something will be figured out", rather than presenting a real plan. And given the enormity of what they are proposing in the long-run, it seems it'd be better to FIRST have a well-worked out solution for the loss of jobs that will naturally come from the wide expansion of AI into every aspect of our lives.

[@johnroberts8443]

we are obviously not good enough as our creator made us so we should give ourselves over to technology so we can truly experience our own obsolescence and appreciate our elimination

[@quantumquestthebillionaire1527]

And by creator you mean our parents right......

[@linmal2242]

What if the Good General AI designs a Super AI by accident and we don't realize? Would this Super AI be able to then copy itself to as many (or ALL) the computers on the internet as possible to back itself up to prevent us from deleting/destroying it?

[@UNOSNET]

This is a glowing speech for "all in" AI but at the same time she seems to completely ingnore any possible negative impact.. that is to me extremely scary. The phrase "Humans are the only creatures in the Universe that can make decisions under unknown circumstances" is just an example for so many absolutes that are to me rather naive but at least unscientific in this speech. We should not proceed like this with a technology as potent as AI. AI needs rules and safety otherwise it might cause unimaginable havoc and as Prof. Hawking said, might be the last invention of humankind....

[@SakibSourav]

Singularity, another important term

[@pankourlaut]

What if general AI is not a single large neural network that can do everything but rather a collection of thousands of neural networks/tools/scripts that can cross-modify each other, code, evaluate and evolve?

[@truthseeker8483]

A Traffic warden lost his/her job to technology and found alternative work..great, but imagine if 80% of existing jobs dissapear for humans...not so easy to find alternative work....but it gives us the opportunity to become alcoholics.....

[@tonyhsloanejr]

It's the best thing that could ever happen if general purpose automation replaces humans on everything that we do. At that point the rich no longer control the world because there's no longer a need for money. And that is the future that is coming which I find interesting because the great irony is that the very people who want to keep their wealth to maintain control will be the ones that usher in the age of general-purpose AI because it's cheaper than workers. They will be so blinded by their greed that they won't see the cliff coming until it's too late. They will try to pull it back and make humans the workers again so they can maintain the status quo but the genie will be out of the bottle.

[@abhishekmangaraj]

No. In the near term, think about Universal basic income. And farther in the future, the world would be personalized according to the needs of every individual without any conflict to the interest of others.

[@truthseeker8483]

@@abhishekmangaraj Universal basic income..great but who will pay it? and it never worked in communist countries...

[@abhishekmangaraj]

@@truthseeker8483 Imagine when all economic, political, social progress is automated by AGI, all the resources will be distributed with the maximum efficiency possible. When people have power over people, it creates inequality and tends towards corruption. Humans would be free to engage in their own pursuits, without worrying about from where their next meal would come from.

[@truthseeker8483]

@@abhishekmangaraj Where will the money come from to pay for AI? Banks...Banks will not relinquish their power....

[@chrisbova9686]

You only need to know a few things about technology... 1. It is insinuated, not offered. You can't even communicate without it. 2. Since 2001, the disparity of wealth has increased 10 fold. 3. You now must fit into one of the sanctioned categories or be ostracized, minimalized, and isolated, lest you are a threat to the narrative. 4. It's only getting worse, as it empowers anyone who does not care for humans, but are self centered and mediocre, thereby impoverishing those who are the better humans.

[@leonjones7120]

Very interesting. Thank you for making this video.

[@RSEFX]

What do you propose that a the average, non-trained worker will be able to do (and how much will it pay) in AI development?

[@thomassmestead6424]

It never ceases to amaze me how these experts in this field seem to be in a huge rush to get GAI online without seriously contemplating the possible dangers underlying such a development. Seems to me,an almost deliberate reluctance to mention the fact that there reaches a point once AI's start upgrading software atonomously that a exponential "intelligence explosion" is a serious possibility wherein very quickly human controls likely would be beyond our ability to install in our own creations. How long would it be that these AI's would far exceed even our ability to even comprehend them, or they, us? Reaching singularity, they would be as uncomprehensible to is as advanced alien voyager's from beyond our galaxy. At best, humanity would be superflous to an artificial superntelligence and at worst, possibly perceived as a complete nuisance. To be fair, there are definite benefits, to be sure. But do the benefits out weigh the risks?

[@RSEFX]

It is worth listening to educated opinions about the very realistically possible, very serious problems that can arise from AI---the overuse of it. I don't feel that people who are making a living at and are funded to do AI development are the most dependable people to listen to. I'd recommend, to start with, giving a listen to the concerns of very rationale NON-luddites like Sam Harris to get at least the beginning of an education about the potential dangers of AI's development.

[@dilyan-2904]

But.. I see a lot of improvement on single cases. Like vision, speech, small steps in specific areas. Combine all of them in one super machine and then we can talk about artificial intelligence. Sophia can't play chess or any game. Watson can't really talk, self driving cars can only drive.. deepmind can play chess etc...

[@ChicagoBob123]

The difference is these are programs that can be added to a single machine over time and as such you can see where this is going.

[@Belowzeroism]

None of them can reason as humans, that's the problem

[@Finarphin]

Super AI is not "new technology" in the sense of anything that has come before. It is going to be a monstrous and overwhelming idolatry. Looking at this presentation, I'm thinking of Sauron pitching the idea of a magic ring to a man.

[@ssPeto]

Perfect analogy.

[@dilyan-2904]

They all say is coming very fast, faster than you think. No. Nobody knows when is coming. Because it needs human work. Tons of work on a field even experts don't know what is going on and how to make brake through.

[@ChicagoBob123]

In the AI industry we see the improvements and the speed of advancements. Its why we see it moving faster than you think

[@lmpIosion]

Dilyan - The first person to live forever has already been born. The next 3-5 years you are going to see Amazon, Walmart, and every major company on earth switch to autonomous, driverless vehicles. In the next 10 years you will see AI designed for manufacturing products on its own, this AI could be imbued with the knowledge of all fields of science and the laws of every country, with the understanding of purchasing habits of people. You will have personal AI on a device you carry with you diagnose your physical condition, warning you of any issues, so that you can go to a hospital where AI with the understanding of every medical journal that has ever existed, can diagnose prevent and cure you of things that doctors today haven't even heard of yet. AI will analyze the stock market, and with all the information ever written about economics, with the instantaneous mathematical capability of 1,000 Einsteins, will give more accurate and more reliable predictions and information to people in every industry, so that we can make the best decisions possible. Will humans be phased out? No, but eventually we will not be needed for any of our skills, or for any of our labor, because there will be AI and robotics capable of taking the whole of human knowledge, that up until then had only been locked away and fragmented between many many human minds, books, scientific journals, mathematical formulas, KZbin videos, and many many other places, and could combine that all into one database. All of human knowledge, unrestricted by different languages, thinking instantly without the limitations of human senses. I see the future with AI or multiple AIs conceptualizing, designing, manufacturing, and building anything humans can desire, and delivering them to our AI designed and built houses, where we as humans live free of disease and aging, in a world powered by endless clean nuclear fusion and solar power. Within 75 years, the world will be so radically different than anything the average person can imagine today, but that children being born today will surely know. Anything we want could potentially be ours, but only if we humans don't completely ruin it all out of greed fear and ignorance before we ever get there.

[@abcdxx1059]

@@lmpIosion it's my dream to make that happen

[@higreentj]

Exciting time to be alive.

[@pudaykumar121]

Important to remember is we did not create the mind and we are not creating AI

[@Torsten167]

She talks about that AI is and will be a tool for us, and not a separate species. I think one day the AI will be a separate species. Not now, but the evolution of AI will be much more faster as the human evolution. The question this time will be "is the AI species much more better as the human species? ". Cause the human species is not the best species here in the world. We make wars for oil and money. Millions of people don't have some to eat, and in our western countries more and more people falls deep in the poorest area. Perhaps the "species IA will know the word EQUALITY or Dignity", cause we don't know these words until these words will touch us.

[@luizbattistel7762]

Citizen science is about democratizing science. For example, we have an astronaut and a quantum scientist participating

[@tonyhsloanejr]

It's 2019 and my prediction for the year 2039 is that everyone will have general purpose robots in their house that they will download apps to for any type of new activity they want it to do. So if you want your general purpose bot to wash dishes you just download the dishes app and the same goes with painting the house or fixing the car. So after a while they have this massive storage of things they can do better than you could ever do and in essence at that point we all no longer need to work.

[@NextFuckingLevel]

The benefits is so big, all superpower denied human rights violations to achieve this new being

[@yujirohanma6194]

new subscriber here☺

[@maheshkumar-vv5fp]

Wow !!! Beauty with brain..

[@raybrandt]

Czech women always smart, pretty and amazing

[@andyramirez4881]

Yea i need me one of those.

[@ssPeto]

Talking about all the benefits while ignoring any possible drawbacks is not educational.

[@joeschmofromidaho8532]

You're right; this completely invalidates her entire talk.

[@AmbionicsUK]

I see this time and time again. AI safety research gets completely overlooked whilst searching to optimize the commercialization of this technology. Therein will be our downfall I suspect.

[@Troyster94806]

She actually did mention a couple of drawbacks.

[@AmbionicsUK]

@@joeschmofromidaho8532 Sarcasm aside, yes ultimately it does. Whats the point in having Ted talks if there are no humans left to watch them?

[@chrisbova9686]

@@Troyster94806 she's handing you the apple, and will call the cops if you don't eat it.

[@shawntravelstheworld911]

In terms of human learning this is called scaffolding learning model.

[@ultramajik]

The problem i see with AI is that morality doesnt seem to be in the equation. For instance, the solution to over-population is to kill off a lot of people. That would work, but I would hope that AI would consider that to be an unacceptable solution.

[@jimj2683]

Morality is a problem among humans too. The only reason people have morals is because of the threat of repercussions

[@vsigal]

Is she kindergarten teacher?

[@sandowando865]

She seem to be and probably is a great one

[@DrSirmacek]

Artificial intelligence & machine learning & big data developer ladies? Come and join to our School of AI please!

[@evdokmv]

This girl to president, comrades!

[@ONDANOTA]

clearly she didn't read "superintelligence" by Nick Bostrom

[@2Fa2Bu]

She is gorgeous

[@curtismarcus8685]

Wow superb content.

[@markcranfield1]

Great presentation

[@dr.mikeybee]

Yes, a baby and a computer are different. Thanks for that.

[@danielg3924]

for now...

[@aubreybilskyrozier]

Dayra talks about studying history or becoming an artist as though we will be living in a socialist utopia after robots and AI take over all the mundane jobs. It’s either naivety or willful ignorance not to fear the economic repercussions of inexpensive advanced AI. Companies will take full advantage of its profit potential or they will lose to their competitors. This is happening already and will continue to happen until it reaches a critical state. UBI isn’t really the answer either. It will just be another bandaid on the inherently flawed and soon to be completely obsolete capitalist economic model. People need to start getting over their sentimental attachments to a system that simply just won’t be adequate anymore.

[@jabz1582]

HOLD UP "We humans are the only intelligent-" EXCUSE ME!? How do you know?

[@manikandanchandramohan5688]

Great speech...

[@nextchannelnext8890]

Citizen Science 13:35

[@carenevo]

Every point is the center of the universe the center of the universe is the nucleus of the consciousness. the universe is an orbital around the nucleus. life is a sub orbital inside the universe The form of consciousness is like an ATOM. The form of the universe is like an ATOM to. It is a fractal. the universe is an orbital inside the consciousness . around the center of the universe exists the general. life is an orbital inside the universe. deep inside life exists man. the universe is an orbital around man reason is an energy level that man orientates towards The elements of reason are the concepts consciousness is much deeper than reason reason is only the surface reason lies like a layer on the outside In the future, the diagnosis system in psychiatry will look like the periodic system in the chemistry

[@primostire]

Wake me up when a.i. can grow my weed..

[@LSD123.]

I think me and you would get along just fine...

[@niels1349]

It can't grow it, but it can be used to maximize yield. In the Netherlands, one of the smaller and more densely populated countries, it is one of the reasons we have the one but largest agricultural export in the world.

[@johnkai5931]

Yes!

[@abhishekmangaraj]

Ha Ha Ha

[@Estrav.Krastvich]

"... and it's not a separe species". Not yet).

[@dfjk193]

David Hohnsbehn In our not-too-distant future a person like this will be speaking to us and at the end of the speech will pull off the wig, turn 180 degrees and you'll see the processors in the back of the ai's skull, you won't have realized that it was artificial intelligence speaking to you at that time we will be at the crossroads; are we their companions, pets, or just a pest such as an ant?

[@jasonsebring3983]

Seems off. You have Elon very very worried about AI and then Elon also he is doing space exploration without the need of general AI at the moment which seems the exact opposite of what she is saying. I am leaning toward the physicist/engineer/entrepreneur/billionaire on this one.

[@abcdxx1059]

He just made a robotic arm

[@solstice2318]

once strong AI is here,the tesla to mars will be occupied by a human driver ,rather than a dummy , thrown into space by the AI lol

[@joshuafitz9084]

She need some AI but into her brain.... Was this Ted for kindergarten... If not I'd put her intelligence at about the lvl of a on and off light switch...

[@clwn7]

Speak in nepali ! I can't understand english.

[@rhianimal19]

We're all gonna die

[@abdicolestudios8899]

Spiffy Turtle eid annog lla er’ew

[@sandowando865]

It's already written on the wall

[@abdicolestudios8899]

sando wando llaw eht no nettirw ydaerla s’ti

[@mydogskips2]

+Spiffy Turtle You're only figuring that out now? ; )

[@ProfessorDrock]

lol

[@vladsch1]

AI is pure intelligence without wisdom or compassion necessitated by evolution of cooperation. In other words it is a pure ego of a single super intellect. What could possibly go wrong?

[@ChrisDragotta]

Cute!

[@badwolf8112]

@Wren Linnet why? she IS cute. and has braces

[@Iamzombiehunter]

AI does not exist. Intelligence is the ability to learn through experience. All devices which process information by addressing 2 active (or more) states of an electron are not performing intelligent action, rather carrying out instructions based on althrothyms in coded form. Perhaps in a hundred years if mankind survives and continues to improve machines based on the current learning curve, then perhaps a computer may have the ability to learn. This concept is simple, yet impossible for computers as we know them today. So called "Quantum computing" is fantasy because it is NOT true computing on a quantum scale by actually manipulating all active 32 states of an electron, but rather aligning electrons on a molecular level to achieve a desired goal. There is no learning only processing instructions by programmers.

[@axl1002]

Have you heard google duplex talking? just google it...

[@conradsieber7883]

All I have to say to this saleswoman is open the pod bay doors HAL. I'm sorry Dave I can not do that.

[@dojenryabun2133]

does this talk help me to make money? frankly NO! could Ai replace Banksters? let's hope so!

[@dimitridehouck9506]

Why should it make you money?

[@jimj2683]

This is just a veiled self promotion of herself and her company. She is a typical narcissist.

[@Salamaleikum80]

or maybe. Don't?

[@LSD123.]

She looks like Cousin It...

[@apexvenom4666]

All im sayin is...ive never herd a scientist with a country accent......

[@SirThreepio]

Nice poster girl. All this sounds like an ad ..... superficial. She did not even obliquely related herself to serious, specific warnings or concerns expressed by leading computer and robotics experts from all over the World. Another blunder is that her "different people with all sorts of backgrounds" are a "cosmonaut" and a "physicist". I would say (for the sake of diversity) try to ask a literature professor, a teeth technician and a philosopher to share their ideas.

[@内田ガネーシュ]

GAIIIII(Y)

[@duggydugg3937]

until a computer ~ A I ~ robot ...whatever...can feel pain or pleasure...it will always be a non human..a not an alive device.. it is being said that robots are learning to improve their own programs... in essence rewrite their programs... If true, this will make robots extremely human-like... Able to do many tasks and interact with humans... So closely resembling alive entities, that it may become difficult to tell the difference between alive and extremely sophisticated robot... but not alive ... my minivan knows when I have left it's engine running..won't let me hit the button to lock all doors until I pull the key.. synapses.. electrochemical ganglia.. nerves..comprise the alive ...animal...not 'if then' circuits... so far only the creator has made living creatures... we mess around with atomic energy and plastics like a child playing with a loaded gun.... look at the results... indians may have lived grim lives by our paradigms..as far as I can tell did no damage to the planet

[@lucas_vasconcelos]

I can't see why you brought the "creator" speech, it has nothing to do with AI. The point is, machines are going to replace us as work force, it doesn't matter if they feel emotions or not, human beings are getting obsolete, and a society with a huge amount of jobless people will just collapse.

[@Iamzombiehunter]

Her speech is difficult to understand, her pronunciation makes me cringe while listening to her, and laugh at the same time based on her ability to fantasize about AI, which currently in the year 2019 does not exist.

[@TheJukeboxhero15]

Darya Hvizdalova, NEVER DEVLEVED ANY AI PRODUCT, LOL

[@skydivekrazy76]

Did anybody else catch her elitism? Watch it again, you will notice it. People like that having the power to control AI is a bit frightening... Which is the PRIMARY thing I think people should be concerned about. Elitist in control of something as powerful as AI...

[@abcdxx1059]

Lol current ai is a bluff

[@solstice2318]

strong AI ,not yet invented ,will not be controlled by any human ,rather control itself

[@larencegagland506]

I don't want a person just out of Jr. high, with crooked teeth, to tell me about the future.

[@shonzhankin5411]

Blah Blah Blah, nobody knows details and speak generalities. We need details, progress and breakthroughs.

[@sitahgalaxie]

she is so naiv.

[@smokingun397]

She compares traffic lights with AI??? WTF is wrong with these people

[@johnnybussart4721]

This was annoying

[@Iamzombiehunter]

This video is really not worth watching. Where can I get back the ten minutes of life I wasted?

[@berthavermout4108]

Oh Man, how she is wrong!!! Because the question is if AI can be controlled! Cannot!!! And who needs it actually?