CORRECTION: Okay, so a lot of you point out that my intro (where I say "most animals have skeletons") is incorrect as most animals are invertebrates. However, as as I mention throughout the video, many invertebrates have skeletons, but typically they are exo- (external) skeletons rather than endo- (internal) skeletons, like us vertebrates have. Therefore, while most animals do have skeletons, I should not have said "within our bodies" because most invertebrates have skeletons outside of their bodies, like shells. In addition, many invertebrate animals have no skeletons at all (soft-bodied), like worms. Hope that makes sense ;) Sorry for the poor wording choice there!
@Dragrath13 ай бұрын
Eh the term invertebrate is misleading as the vertebrate clade has never had a monopoly on endoskeletons and all vertebrates share an evolutionarily speaking "recent" common ancestor which was itself an "invertebrate" meaning the term is polyphyletic and thus cladistically useless. It should also be noted that an organism can have both endoskeletons and exoskeletons One surprising group of animals which have endoskeletons is chelicerates a clade of arthropods of which at least some have cartilaginous endoskeletons which serve as muscle anchoring attachment points. And other "invertebrate" animal groups off the top of my head with endoskeletons include echinoderms and at least prior to the evolution of echolocation in cetaceans strongly selecting against them many cephalopods also had endoskeletons with most barring octopus still retaining some degree of vestigial/reduced/demineralized endoskeletons.
@uncleanunicorn45713 ай бұрын
I've heard by 1 bya we had an ozone layer leading to our familiar blue skies, but no bony skeletons until 500 mya. Makes me wonder what role the snowball earth cycles had in the availability of the phosphates and calcium needed?
@footfault19413 ай бұрын
You're not boneless at all! Proved.
@diebesgrab3 ай бұрын
Yeah, my immediate reaction to that wording was: “a-dibba-wha?”
@Sepi-chu_loves_moths3 ай бұрын
@Dragrath1 correct me if im wrong, but wouldn't that make invertebrates paraphyletic not polyphyletic? Not trying to correct you just curious
@IsaacKuo3 ай бұрын
I love how arthropods were like, "Segments! Segments! And MORE segments!" and in the meantime mollusks were like, "Maybe we should try out a second bone. Let's not get too crazy, but let's see how a second bone works out and maybe go from there. Or not. Two bones is enough."
@barbaradurfee6453 ай бұрын
The most exciting and satisfying ascpect of your videos is that you talk about the evolving interplay between biology, chemistry, geology and phsics at every scale and throughout Earth history.
@donaldbrizzolara77203 ай бұрын
I would agree. She excels at synthesizing data into a format that is not only understandable and thought provoking but throughout is effortlessly expressed via a very pleasant and cheerful delivery. She has a gift.
@Antikyth3 ай бұрын
I love your presentation style! You talk confidently and in a very easy to process way, not sure exactly how to word it but your explanations are easy to follow. I admit I wasn't sure what the quality of this video would be seeing it had fewer views than most videos in my recommendations but I thought it was a very interesting sounding topic so I clicked anyway... clearly I was wrong to make the association between number of views and quality! You have certainly earned a subscription and like :)
@beback_2 ай бұрын
It's academic style, without extra fluff.
@donaldbrizzolara77203 ай бұрын
Rachel: I find it fascinating that the first evidence of bony hydroxyapatite is found in the teeth structures of conodonts. A very similar condition is found in ostracoderms but more extreme in that hydroxyapatite went beyond teeth but expanded into an armored structure that encased the head. If one were to cut the cranial bone of an ostracoderm open and observe it microscopically one would find virtually the same mineralogy found in vertebrate teeth. The body of ostracoderms as well as conodonts were boneless. Hence, it appears to me that vertebrate skeletons first had there origins in teeth (conodonts) and head armor/teeth (ostracoderms). Bony body structures came later. Fun stuff to think about.
@toweypat3 ай бұрын
That is interesting, and it makes sense. Evolution often works that way.
@objective_psychology3 ай бұрын
Yup, we all come from exoskeletal fish
@barryagar37903 ай бұрын
Was the evolution of teeth the beginning of the predator prey ‘arms race’?
@Marshymilz3 ай бұрын
Hey Geo Girl, loving your vids. I am a current 2nd year undergrad in applied geology and they have been a huge help. If you ever have the chance, would love if you could make a vid about your study methods over the years for the geosciences. As I've seen it is the number one thing students struggle with and you seemed to know so many topics from the inside out. Thanks for the awesome content :)
@SiqueScarface3 ай бұрын
Apparently, biologists and geologists have a different idea of what a skeleton is. For biologists, the notochord is a skeleton, because it stabilizes the body and is used to attach muscular tissue. It is not a columna vertebralis (backbone) though, hence animals with only a notochord are not considered vertebrae.
@zechariah223 ай бұрын
6:30am educational content just hits different
@duhduhvesta3 ай бұрын
10.45 was awesome
@philochristos3 ай бұрын
I always assumed the first bone was a tooth. But it guess it makes sense that it might've been a shell. When the aliens get here, I wonder if they will have exoskeletons or endoskeletons.
@donnyfanizzi53603 ай бұрын
Thank you. As usual another excellent video
@jimthain87773 ай бұрын
So you could say that skeletons make up the backbone of paleontology. Thanks for the video, I just love how enthusiastically you present your talks.
@Pay-It_Forward3 ай бұрын
17:00 *This is a no brainer! my expertise is agronomy. Burgess Shale which contains the best record we have of Cambrian animal fossils, has TWICE as much Molybdenum as the crust of the earth & (200 times) as much as Earth's Oceans!!! Molybdenum is required for over 50 enzymes processing & Fixing Nitrogen, plus is needed for construction of many essential amino acids. Plus is needed for phosphate assimilation, plus as a biological catalyst for proton & electron transfer, plus oxygen transfer coupled reactions in biochemistry & phosphorus recycling symbiosis!*
@harrygoldhagen27323 ай бұрын
Thanks, Rachel, excellent as always! And let me say, as an older viewer, I appreciate that you've slowed down your delivery. The slower (though definitely not slow!) pace really allows me to follow all you are saying and understand it. I'm wondering if you've ever made a video about the beginning of life, especially the theory that life began at hydrothermal deep-sea vents. I've read a few review papers on the subject by Dr. William Martin, but I do not understand the chemistry happening at the vents, something he calls serpentinization (along with a whole lot of other chemistry). Thanks again!
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! That is good to hear ;) I have made some videos on that, but nothing that goes into the specific chemistry like that, so that is a great idea for a future video, thank you! :D
@punditgi3 ай бұрын
I always love Geogirl videos. Woo hoo! ❤🎉😊
@v_zach3 ай бұрын
If you get a chance, an explanation of why sponges are animals would be interesting. In particular could an argument be made to put them in their own kingdom?
@Sakkura13 ай бұрын
Sponges are multicellular organisms that can move, especially in their juvenile stage, making them more similar to other animals than anything else. We can also look at their DNA and see they're more closely related to us than any non-animals. All animals have a common ancestor that was likely similar to a sponge or a choanoflagellate. The latter are our closest living unicellular relative.
@neotericrecreant3 ай бұрын
I never even considered such small animals to be capable of "skeletons".
@Cam_V9103 ай бұрын
Good job as always, Skeletons theme might have been fun for around Halloween theme....lol
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
Oh that is a great idea, I wish I'd thought of that lol
@LiamRedmill3 ай бұрын
You got me hooked on the subject again,and I was surprised to see the variety of element's utilized in skeletons,,it's very complex and ongoing with the discovery of new/older fossil's.the use and source of phosphates is fascinating,but is poorly understood as it was eroding field's and bog's and swamp's that fed the oceon's with brackish/phosphates rich living field's(metamorphic.maybe you could explain mineralogically brackish water's from iron/phosphates rich bog's and field's.thanks so much
@robbabcock_3 ай бұрын
Wow, very interesting! I hadn't even thought to wonder about the topic. 💀🐚🐟
@skipugh3 ай бұрын
I love your content. I learn so much.
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
Thanks so much! I am so happy to hear that ;D
@cw74293 ай бұрын
Very interesting video!
@Sakkura13 ай бұрын
0:04 Most animals do not have a skeleton inside of them. Invertebrates almost always have no internal bones, and they are more numerous than us vertebrates. Over 90% of animal species, and an even greater percentage in terms of actual numbers of animals. On land, you'll find lots of insects, flatworms, arthropods etc. and at sea you'll also find animals like echinoderms (starfishes etc) and sponges.
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
See correction comment ;)
@michaeleisenberg78673 ай бұрын
Hello Rachel 🎾, This is a superb video 🎥. Extremely interesting. I loved 🥰 it. 🙏 Have a great weekend 💥🍔🌭🧨! 👏👏👏👏👏
@michaeleisenberg78673 ай бұрын
Rachel 🐈🥰, It's never a question of will you send me down a rabbit 🐇hole, but which one? Today it was conodonts and chaetognathas (nektonic arrow worms). I think protoconodonts was the common ancestor. Arrow worms 🪱 were an apex predator a few million years before the much talked about, Anomalocaris 🪳.
@nathanmiller56583 ай бұрын
Fun and facinating video. GG at her best.
@meesalikeu3 ай бұрын
thi is a great topic and just a lot of fun. it also makes you think about ocean world moons around the solar system. especially because the sun didnt really directly come into play with all this until 20min of the 24min video.
@Dragrath13 ай бұрын
So one important factor which was left out in terms of the origin of mineralized skeletons in animals is the role of scarce essential mineral storage serving as a selective pressure for internal skeleton formation especially in the case of calcium phosphate where calcium plays an essential role in ion action potentials and electrochemical gradients and phosphorus is essential for many critical biological processes most notably RNA DNA and ATP. This evolutionary function is at odds with their use as structural scaffolding in vertebrates and thus biologically plays a key role in bone loss since if a vertebrate can get away without it converting structurally unused bone material into metabolic use is important given the essential nature of these mineral elements towards Earth based life. Anyways in terms of early complexity it might be worth your while to look at the Francevillian biota as the Francevillian basin seems to have had many of the conditions which would spread more globally during the Neoproterozoic some 2.1 Ga. Also from what I have read they don't think the Ozone layer arose until much later or at least if it existed it didn't become opaque to UV C radiation until the Paleozoic timeframe or has that work been refuted?
@_andrewvia3 ай бұрын
The yt closed caption system has trouble keeping up with your vocabulary. I guess it's not trained at a college level. Thanks for another great video. (I have cc turned on because other people I listen to have strong accents (like British or Australian)). You have excellent diction, but the cc still helps me take in your content by letting me both hear and see what you're saying.)
@_andrewvia3 ай бұрын
I see some high-caliber comments - people with a vocabulary as strong as yours, who are here enjoying your videos along with the rest of us mortals.
@khagan3 ай бұрын
When you said "official" at about 5:07, the emphasis made it sound like a pun (of-fish-al 😅)
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
Haha that's hilarous, I wish I could say it was intentional ;)
@clydecessna7373 ай бұрын
Rachel, Could you talk about what indirect evidence there is for life that we have no direct fossil evidence for. What percent of the history of life is known?
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
That is a wonderful question! I will work on a future video over that ;D Thanks for the suggestion!
@kensounds51773 ай бұрын
the early skeletons could also have begun as a way of storing minerals for later use
@robertab9293 ай бұрын
Our bones are also a partial storage, for example, they store calcium.
@mickrawson293 ай бұрын
Please do a video on your favourite textbook references and explaining why. In this age of information, it would be great to hear opinions.
@qazsedcft21623 ай бұрын
19:45 why are you showing a tree at >2Ga? 🤔
@Poey123 ай бұрын
Crazy thorough, thanks!
@ewade2443 ай бұрын
Ok, ScarJo, the brown hair isn't fooling anybody. I had no idea you had such a rich interest in vertebrates. Ms Johanson never ceases to amaze me. What a talent! 🎥 🍿 🧪 🔭 🐠
@reidflemingworldstoughestm13943 ай бұрын
Finally, a Geo Girl video for us ordinary mortals.
@LorenStClair3 ай бұрын
You are so cool to keep putting out this Contant, I wish you get to middle school or earlier
@peterolbrisch89703 ай бұрын
Remember, the average amount of skeletons per person is always more than one.
@od14523 ай бұрын
First Skeleton.... Already thinking on Sunday Morning before my coffee. Wow....no or not much of an Ozone layer.... I never really thought about that..but I guess that is a good reason for life to start in the water... Boy... bring your sunscreen. Have you discussed the first multi cell organism yet? Thanks good topic.
@chrisstanford36523 ай бұрын
Excellent synopsis 🤗
@RichardLightburn3 ай бұрын
One of your best
@ozachar3 ай бұрын
So egg shell is an exoskeleton of a single cell? Is there research on the formation process and genetic origin of egg shells in comparison to other exoskeletons in living organisms?
@whiskeytango97693 ай бұрын
I think that the kick-off was vision, which enabled effective predation, which resulted in skeletonization and armour.
@uncleanunicorn45713 ай бұрын
Ive heard by 1 bya we had an ozone layer leading to our familiar blue skies, but no bony skeletons until 500 mya. Makes me wonder what role the snowball earth cycles had in the availability of the phosphates and calcium needed?
@olecranon3 ай бұрын
Jellyfish...not actually fish Starfish....not actually fish Shellfish...not actually fish Seahorses...actually fish!
@Musabre3 ай бұрын
Fish....not actually a thing. ;P
@douglasdingler94053 ай бұрын
They are called fish since people once called anything that primarily live in water a fish. Today people know better, but the language is slow to change.
@Rico-Suave_3 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you very much , note to self(nts) watched 23:49
@nicholasmaude69063 ай бұрын
As far as I know, Rachel ( @GEOGIRL ), the first creatures with skeletons to walk on dry land were arthropods probably Eurypterids.
@nicholasmaude69063 ай бұрын
Weren't conodonts sort of a lamprey precursor?
@shadeen36043 ай бұрын
thanks Dr geo girl great
@eotheewakan8793 ай бұрын
What about isotopes?
@tessygrondin12713 ай бұрын
Is bark a type of skeleton ?
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
What a wonderful question and thought! This question may warrent a follow up video ;) I mean they are used for protection and stability, just like animal skeletons, so I can't see why not! I will look into it and see if I can't make a video on that ;)
@jameswright...3 ай бұрын
I'd think more likely skin or more protection, armour. Remove it the tree doesn't collapse but it will weep and suffer.
@neworderadherent3 ай бұрын
Life is amazing. I wish we knew more from the time period!
@Broken_robot19863 ай бұрын
It's not important to be first, just to have fun. What's the first animal just chilling and having a good time? Not sure how that would look in the fossil record.
@AdrianBoyko3 ай бұрын
Decades ago, a friend had a sign above his front door that read “Forsake Ye Your Skeletons, All Ye Who Enter Here!”
@MrX-nv8kp3 ай бұрын
Now i'm wondering, what is a skeleton? Shouldn't cytoskeletons count, too? Why do chordata not count? And why are some shells or armor considered skeltons, but not in others? 🤔
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
That's a great question! Where is the line drawn when it comes to organic skeletons, I have no idea... I guess they have to meet some sort of rigidity and protective standards, but I don't know if these are clearly defined anywhere, good point ;)
@perceptron-13 ай бұрын
An idea arose: is it possible that calcium deposits in the blood vessels are caused by the destroyed micro-skeletons? A research has to be started on this, and please register my Nobel Prize!
@robertab9293 ай бұрын
destroyed micro-skeletons?
@gingazaurus3 ай бұрын
Very interesting, thanks.
@jamesdriscoll_tmp15153 ай бұрын
Do cuttle bones count?
@sailcat93 ай бұрын
Didn't the (possibly predatory) Ediacaran creature Spriggina possess an exoskeleton?
@emom3583 ай бұрын
I just passed it off as youthful enthusiasm until I finished the video.😂
@Kraflyn3 ай бұрын
tldr? what animal or microbe had the very first skeleton?
@MoonMoon-127753 ай бұрын
Very cool
@patrickgriffiths8893 ай бұрын
Thanks.
@savagesarethebest72513 ай бұрын
15:40 I wish my computer was quick to point it out
@IsaacKuo3 ай бұрын
Imagine if our fish/tetrapod ancestor line had silica skeletons. "Eat your sand, little Bobby SQL Injection."
@789563able3 ай бұрын
Very interesting. But complicated. Things were simpler when the earth was only six thousand years old.
@johnbaker12563 ай бұрын
Interesting
@barryfennell97233 ай бұрын
electron microscope shows the diatoms. i know carbon is an essential element but it makes me think about evolving in-organic fractals that could have been.
@beachboardfan95443 ай бұрын
Was watching this video the other day and you were the first person I thought of, have you heard of this (I'm sure you have, but I searched your video library and couldnt find anything)? Would you do a vid expanding on what H20 mechanic touches on? I've never heard of this before but I think its fascinating. kzbin.info/www/bejne/oXaqf6J6ltJnoqMsi=dRQW_BhF22hc0viy Around 9:30 he gets into the geology formation thats causing their struggling.
@whiskeytango97693 ай бұрын
If I had to guess...several seconds into the video...I would guess it was sponges that had the first skeletons.
@eotheewakan8793 ай бұрын
Fish are truly ancient creatures and have always been delicious
@TheMasonX233 ай бұрын
By skeleton, I mean the spooky, scary kind that send shivers down your spine
@Saleca3 ай бұрын
Better tittle imo "what came first? Animal or skeleton?"
@rickkwitkoski19763 ай бұрын
Thank you
@garylister3 ай бұрын
'As humans you and I have skeletons within our bodies' could you imagine...yuck!
@eotheewakan8793 ай бұрын
My brain…might have an exo-skeleton but I still watched…most of the video..,when I was paying attention past about 1 millimeters or less…or more carbonate or sicilica or chitin or sharks or cartilage or more radiolarens or Carbonifera~ Thank the goddess of the sea for fish for tacos~I didn’t realize how ancient they truly are and I see salsa differently now!
@oleksandrbyelyenko4353 ай бұрын
Gonna put my 🤓 mode. Most animal are invertebrates so the most animals don't have a skeleton.
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
Well, most invertebrates also have skeletons, they are just exo rather than endoskeletons. So, you're right, I should not have said 'within' our bodies in the intro! Sorry for the poor wording, I've posted a correction comment, see above ;)
@Sakkura13 ай бұрын
Many invertebrates have a skeleton, but it's almost always an exoskeleton.
@oleksandrbyelyenko4353 ай бұрын
@@GEOGIRL well, yes, I should have pointed out endoskeletons. Anyway, no hard feelings, all in good faith. P.S. I've seen your correction
@satyammahajan75713 ай бұрын
My friend is a vertebrate but has no spine.
@sirensynapse56033 ай бұрын
Sleestaks.
@doriansebastian80653 ай бұрын
I also have skeletons in my body but also in my closet... 😮😢
@iamKBCummings3 ай бұрын
conodont teeth served as geothermomoters.
@gasdive3 ай бұрын
3:22 it's not "insects *or* crustaceans" Insects *are* crustaceans. (Pancrustacea)
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
Oh I thought insects were in the subphylum Hexopoda and Crustacea subphylum was mainly the aquatic crustaceans... I wasn't aware of the Pancrustacea group, cool!
@gasdive3 ай бұрын
@@GEOGIRL I gather that it was reorganised due to molecular information. I'm not sure when though. There have been lots of exciting changes just in the last few years!
@gasdive3 ай бұрын
Look for the video "Butterflies are crustaceans" from "Clint's Reptiles". It's an exciting romp through arthropoda. I can't recommend his phylogeny videos too highly.
@clintwestwood18953 ай бұрын
Aren't rhino beetles the strongest living thing alive today? and their power comes from in part to their Exo's?
@slowdownex3 ай бұрын
This video is fine, but maybe just a little too slow paced for me. Does anyone else agree?
@Valdagast3 ай бұрын
Could these UV-absorbing pigments have evolved into chlorophyll? Not only absorbing the energy but using it in a productive way.
@priyanshu95.3 ай бұрын
wow
@thepiper55223 ай бұрын
Fourth!
@johnvl63583 ай бұрын
😎
@KIMRT364473 ай бұрын
😊
@usapatriot4443 ай бұрын
Hold on…let’s get the first protocell to replicate. Origin for mitosis please?
@RuRockhound3 ай бұрын
Appetites for apatite.
@youtubejosephwm66993 ай бұрын
Hey Rachel sorry I don't mean to keep nagging you but I sent you an email
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
I know, I am getting to it, I am so sorry for the delay! For some reason, I have just been getting completely inundated with emails recently ;)
@youtubejosephwm66993 ай бұрын
@@GEOGIRL okay do you know which email it is
@GEOGIRL3 ай бұрын
@@youtubejosephwm6699 Yep I saw your recent email! :)