western hunter gatherers were not that dark.. they were dark but those examples exaggerate the skin tone A LOT!
@johnbrereton52297 ай бұрын
The controversial reconstruction of Cheddar man found in England was one of these dark images shown. However, the leading geneticists who worked on the Ch4 TV programme that it was featured in said that it was impossible to discover his skin tone and the choice of dark skin was political rather than scientific.
@InterDIMEnsionals104 ай бұрын
Yes, my Father and I are I2. We have the ability to tan darker than more than most, but where the sun don't shine is paper white. We both have blue eyes.
@fabbeyonddadancer14 күн бұрын
Well darker then majority of modern day German populations
@bastian96935 ай бұрын
Stopped watching after the black washing began 😂
@tedtimmis81357 ай бұрын
Caution: German DNA is on the FBI watchlist.
@jimbo75777 ай бұрын
😂 funny, but basically true😂
@Thomas-gn9bv5 ай бұрын
1/3 of Americans are from German origin.
@bln1502 ай бұрын
It's going to become a big Islamic Republic together with the rest of the Western Europe by the end of this century.
@devildogu12847 ай бұрын
love to see black "hunter gatherers" which we have no source for
@wowjack89447 ай бұрын
What is the skin color based on? When you read ''high-coverage genome of the tyrolean iceman reveals unusually high anatolian farmer ancestry'' in cell genomics, they mention in the highlights that Otzi (anatiolian farmer) had ''dark skin''. The weighted genetic score of dark pigmentation is 0.59, which is only slightly higher than the same models gives for present-day sardinians 0.589 (who are white). These models are already flawed by chosing which SNPS to measure and which not, so why are you depicting them as black? It just seems like a political choise. Maybe make as video on it.
@userwsyz7 ай бұрын
Sardinians have dark skin tone. They are white in the sense as a race, not in skin color. North Africans, such as Egyptian, Moroccan, Niger etc and people in Middle East and west Asia are all white race but have dark skin.
@wowjack89447 ай бұрын
@@userwsyz Both your claims are wrong. Sure sardinians have darker skin than most Europeans, but they are genetically Europeans and they are probably around the same skin tone as some Moroccans. People from the Midde-East are a different race from Europeans and this becomes obvious if you do a Getnetic cluster analysis.
@wowjack89447 ай бұрын
@@userwsyz Just look up ''sardinians'' online and tell me they look like people from the M-E.
@userwsyz7 ай бұрын
@@wowjack8944 I didn’t say they are European. I said they are White race. European is not a race. It just means people with a nationality in Europe. Anyway, like it or not, North Africans and people in the Middle East are white race. Skin color is not the determinant of race. East Asians can have very light skin but they are not white race.
@wowjack89447 ай бұрын
@@userwsyz No you are wrong. What people call the ''Whites'' is the European race. I agree that skin color does not determine race. There are some Iranians that are whiter than some Greeks, but that does not make those Iranians Greeks. Greek islanders are often pretty swarthy and have notable Middle Eastern admixture (around 30%, see the Dodecanese population above). However, they are still genetically closest to Europeans and even the swarthiest of Greeks generally have European facial morphology distinct from that of Middle Easterners. What distinguishes Europeans from MENA people are different proportions of ancestry from ancient populations like Western Hunter-Gatherers, Early European Farmers, and Proto-Indo-Europeans. Additional ancestry from populations unique to each group are: 1.Much higher proportions of WHG Moderately higher proportions of Anatolia_N 2. Significantly lower proportions of Iran_N (which is actually a Caucasus population in Europeans, not Iranian) 3. Ancestry from Eastern European Hunter-Gatherers (EHG), which is absent from the MENA gene pool 4. Almost no Levant_N ancestry, which is a major component of the MENA gene pool 5. No Sub-Saharan African ancestry (Yoruba), which is found in trace amounts in the MENA gene pool.
@celtofcanaanesurix22457 ай бұрын
the funnelbeakers did not look like that, in fact they were some of the first people on earth to have the combination of blue eyes and blonde hair. Not to mention the WHG you showed a moment before does not look right, the skin tone is ok, but the face is too gracile and almost african in features, and the WHG had blue eyes mainly, even over brown eyes
@InterDIMEnsionals105 ай бұрын
The ancient hunter gatherer picture is totally off. Haplogroup I2 and I1 comprised these paternal lines. I2 (Cheddar Man) (Dinaric) is highest in percentage in the Balkans now and I1 in Sweden. The photo is of a sub-Saharan ( A-B) African man or (E).
@savvassyrmopoulos55707 ай бұрын
30 years ago I read that a german anthropologist called today's Germany as "Germanoslavia" due to the mix of Slavs with previous Germans in the centuries. Unfortunately I can't find the source today.
@chandleryoung95157 ай бұрын
That’s very interesting! I’m half Irish, close to half German and I have small amounts of native, south Asian, west Asian dna. A lot of people have always said I look very similar to Eastern Europeans so the Slavic connection to Germany really interests me.
@SrdjanBasaric-w2s7 ай бұрын
@@chandleryoung9515 From the island of Rugen, then by line to Trieste and then to Vladivostok to the east, everything is Slavian.
@userwsyz7 ай бұрын
@@SrdjanBasaric-w2snot true. Vladivostok is Russian but not Slavic. Most people there are mongoloid people. In fact, 75% of Russian land is populated by non Slavic peoples, though they are only about 25% of Russian population.
@InterDIMEnsionals105 ай бұрын
Haplogroup I (I2) in particular is Paleo - Europe. It encompassed all of Europe and is Native to it. The ethnogenesis of Proto-Germanic and Proto- Slavic (others) cultures comes from this Haplogroup I stock. The addition of R1a & R1b Steppe Peoples, and others, creates the gene pool of Europe today. Haplogroup I was present back to the upper Paleolithic. and was the vast majority in the European theatre. "Germanoslavia"
@MinecraftHardcore983 ай бұрын
Can not forget the language came from Scandinavia. All Germanic people of today are ultimately Scandinavian tribes. If German forefathers are predominantly frankish then that's why their language is continental. But there's much other germanic speakers that influenced them. Vikings too are their ancestors. German phenotypes differ verily especially from highly R1a ethnicities like Poles.
@Ancestrallinguist3 ай бұрын
German look completely different to Polish people. Very true
@thorstenjaspert93944 ай бұрын
Germany was always heterogeneous population. "The German" never existed.
@robertprice50394 ай бұрын
Your % don't add up to 100%? The funny thing is my Hunter/Gatherer (45%) and Farmer (43%) are your typical figures for a German. I am 1/4 East Prussian and 3/4 British Isles mixture.
@Ancestrallinguist4 ай бұрын
Nice. Some ancestral groups were left out as they aren’t significant or important to overall story
@beverlybelcher34235 ай бұрын
Interesting video.
@Ancestrallinguist5 ай бұрын
Glad you think so!
@beverlybelcher34235 ай бұрын
@@Ancestrallinguist Yes, I a great amount of German ancestry on my father’s side. My son and I were able to trace my maiden name of Lsckner back to Austria.
@Ancestrallinguist5 ай бұрын
@@beverlybelcher3423 cool, where do your family migrate to?
@beverlybelcher34235 ай бұрын
@@Ancestrallinguist Pennsylvania. U.S.A.
@beverlybelcher34235 ай бұрын
@@Ancestrallinguist I am sorry. Lackner!
@martinranalli85722 ай бұрын
Are the ethnic English genetically related to ethnic Germans?
@Ancestrallinguist2 ай бұрын
Yes
@SrdjanBasaric-w2s7 ай бұрын
As someone said, if you dig under Berlin, everything is Slavyan. Even the name.
@AugustinoSteenberg2 ай бұрын
Lovely to note ❤️🇩🇪🖤💛 and get knowledge! Jesus Christ is good for generations ❤️💕💝💟✝️🛐🩷💞❤️!!
@bradhilton22834 ай бұрын
I am of British origins , but i find German and Scandinavia women quit intoxicating. Very beautiful indeed. I have wondered what kind of children I would make if I was too mate with one of there fine beauty’s.
@kidmills6201Ай бұрын
I can only understand every 5th word you speak slow down
@oghuz_kaghan7 ай бұрын
No speaks about turko germanic ppl bc of attila invasion also cuman kipchak invasion
@userwsyz7 ай бұрын
They did not mix much with the Germanic people. but mostly mixed with the Turkic and Slavic people, Hungarians are the result. The germanic people ran away from the Huns. And the Huns were mixtures of mongoloid and Turkic peoples.
@oghuz_kaghan7 ай бұрын
@@userwsyz but in the the cuman kipchak confederation they did mixed alot with east and south germany Specialy todays munich around there you see alot turkic looking ppl in germany these are the descendants of cumans they Look german but they are turkic also did you know that ancient kyrghiz ppl are related to uralic ppl nowdays are they a mix of ural altaic and uralic ppl im very interested in to cumans and they exist even now one of the biggest turkic mercenary group they served but never truly ruled its rare for the formal behaviour in the turkic history to see that a turkic tribe wants to serve whoever got power instead fighting it till one of the sides gets whiped off.
@stanislavarutkowskiАй бұрын
@@userwsyzThe Huns were never real people. They are mentioned in the Eddas though, and nowhere within them indicates that they were racially different from the Goths (early Germanic people).
@Se2n67g9r7 ай бұрын
At min 3:50. Lithuanian... you lost my respect. I mean can you at least drop the general consensus of today's political inclination for some real science, please?