Get the Facts : Which Engine is Better ? 3 Cylinder vs 4 Cylinder

In this video, we're going to compare the advantages and disadvantages of 3 cylinder engines vs. 4 cylinder engines. We'll discuss the pros and cons of each engine type, and decide which engine is better for you.
Deciding whether to buy a 3 cylinder engine or a 4 cylinder engine can be tough. But with this video, you'll have all the information you need to make a well-informed decision. watching this video will help you decide which engine is right for you!
அச்சம் தவிர் ! நேர்பட பேசு !
Reach Us @ 93632 72083
Mail ID : [e-mail]
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @gsautomotives

[@ArulAjith]

3 cyc is not as efficient as 4 cyl. Vibration and reliability are the main concerns of 3 cylinders and expect less engine life as well compared to 4 cyl.

[@vivekananthangopalakrishna4841]

Bro thanks nan annaiku keta contenta post panirukinga superb, thanks.... Keep rocking...

[@zzzsenthil70]

If compretion pannum bothu more air or copresed air anupinal more tark kidaikuma

[@motors1535]

Anna cars ellam eppadi design panranga please itha pathi pasunga

[@CarCraze-VimalKumar]

Superb Explanation GS Sir🎉❤😮

[@prasanthperumalsamy225]

Nice information bro…

[@markdencil1834]

Bro tatala yellow board cars varuma...konja update pannunga....Swift suthama sarila...

[@sanjayk708]

3 cylinders 1.2 li turbo charger hill station nala perform panuma bro compared to 4 cylinders?

[@MARVEL-FOREVER]

Fantastic, semma detailed and short and sweet ah solitinga.

[@GSAutoMotives]

Thank you so much brother, for your extensive support 😊

[@KeerthivasanVasan-hk4pd]

Excellent content bro 🎉🎉 need more videos like this 💯

[@GSAutoMotives]

Thank you so much brother, for your extensive support 😊

[@venkatasubramanian2649]

Triber 3 cylinder a irukurathala enna disadvantages athula pls anyone reply?

[@babababa2566]

எவ்வளவு தரமாக செய்தாலும்,3 சிலிண்டர் ,நான்கு சிலிண்டர்க்கு இணையாகாது...

[@VijayAutomotives]

greater topic always

[@siddarthsubramanian8775]

Hi bro im your big fan. Im planning to buy Nissan Magnite Non turbo - because that only matches my budget. So, can u please advise me whether it would be feasible to pull 5 people while driving? Even if it can pull on normal roads, would that be feasible for hill station ride...i mean can that car pull off 5 people and luggages?

[@GSAutoMotives]

1.0 L NA will struggle on Hills brother.

[@karthickvelushamy]

Buy exter or punch

[@siddarthsubramanian8775]

@@GSAutoMotives thanks bro. Can u please tell us which engine pulls how many people comfortably

[@DavidDavid-rk8rn]

Super bro 🎊

[@samrudh5977]

Super bro

[@motovlogs7744]

Unga video super bro

[@PraveenKumar-nd8hu]

Superb explanation bro ❤

[@GSAutoMotives]

Thank you so much 🙂

[@dr.yuvarajanpalanisamy9805]

Nice bro

[@gokulv6172]

4 cylinder- reliability, refinement, less mileage, long life 3 cylinder - more mileage, no refinement, decent life With turbo - raises bhp and push. Reason for syncint with 3cyl is to reduce loss in mileage due to turbo

[@roobannatarajan9468]

Suzuki 4cylinder K series give more mileage than Tata revotron 3cyliner

[@gokulv6172]

@@roobannatarajan9468 bro lighter steel mean lesser curb weight resulting in more mileage. Yes Tata has flaws in after sales service. But build quality takes a call here. Also push of 1.2Litre differs with 1 litre. So compare with another 1.2 bro. Not 1 litre k10

[@roobannatarajan9468]

@gokulv6172 not comparing with 1.0K bro. I am comparing with 1.2K engine only. Which is in Baleno, Swift, wagonR, Ignis. But I agree kerb Weight play a role here. But still I feel Suzuki K engines are best in market.

[@Raveendhana]

Chances of turbo failure or gasket failure is always high in a turbocharged three cylinder, unless it's strongly built, 5 years since nexon launch is too short to predict the life of a three cylinder turbo as the market is just flooded with three cylinder turbo now

[@RAJKUMARRAJARATHNAMSUBRAMANIAN]

A 3 cylinder is more fuel economy and cost effective than a 4 cylinder . So we need to compromise on power and vibration. So manufacturers are adding turbo for power.

[@Raveendhana]

Yes that's where things sometimes gets bad, if it's Ill designed or cheaped out chances are there for failure over time.

[@Aravinths3]

You can see the tata engines 🤣 which are worst in segment

[@alagarsamys8659]

ஐயா என்ன ஒரு விளக்கம் 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

[@ksraghul5654]

Bro.. clarify my doubt...If both 3 cylinder engine and 4 cylinder engines are subjected to same usage and maintenance parallely, which engine is more durable?

[@venbas2]

4 cylinder wins by a wide margin on longevity refinement and maintenance

[@krish-tv2pw]

Good information bro

[@GSAutoMotives]

Thank you so much 🙂

[@villagefoodie5864]

We need maruti 800 Alto 800 3cylinder engine basics, maintenance, full details video m top to bottom

[@GSAutoMotives]

Noted, brother

[@villagefoodie5864]

@@GSAutoMotives I'm waiting brother I have Alto 800 2015 model but hill station Elam polama pickup irukkuma maintenance epdi pananum Elam sollunh brother

[@Raveendhana]

Long life ku 4 cylinder or even number cylinder engines always better, and some of the old Suzuki engines were three cylinder thaan it was reliable, those days the power of the three cylinder engines never used to exceed more than 65 - 70 ps, but these days the non turbo ones itself is 70-90 hp, for eg the one in kiger is only 71 but kiger is a big car, and Tata punch is 83 ps, so my take is three how much ever balancing is done to reduce vibration it's all depends on the quality of the build, even brands like Mazda, Mercedes has had three cylinder but they were costly, now our Desi brands or budget brand engines are built at a cost, so the life is very much 50 /50 dhaan, specially the turbo ones la it all depends on how well the engine is built. If you wanna keep the car for 8 years or more then 4 cylinder better. Nexon does not have 4 cylinder petrol but brezza has

[@sudheeshkumar9632]

Comedy thought

[@Raveendhana]

@@sudheeshkumar9632 sir I have been in engine design and maintenance, the three cylinder turbos have always been a knife edge than, there have been reliability issues, but that entirely depends on how the engine is designed and developed. It also depends on how well it's maintained, it will always be a debatable point dhaan or contesting point thaan, thats the same point that makes Suzuki to sell brezza with a 1.5 4 cylinder NA till now

[@Raveendhana]

@@sudheeshkumar9632 because in a three cylinder engine you have to push it to get the maximum from it, specially to extract more power they turbo charge it, so when a three cylinder is laboured all the time by forced Induction the chances of things getting failed is high compared to it's 4 cylinder NA or even 4 cylinder turbos, the build has to be such a way that it has to negate each and every issue while designing a thee cylinder, right from engine vibration to the materials used to make the engines. Apart from this a manufacturer has to consider the power to weight ratio such that the three cylinder does not labour always

[@whysoserious7553]

​@@Raveendhanabro I'm planning to buy swift car should I buy 2023 model or upcoming 2024 model 3 cylinder? I need good mileage won't cross 1 lack km in 5 years I guess

[@Raveendhana]

@@whysoserious7553 bro as for three cylinder I will take a chance with Suzuki than Tata Bro, as Suzuki are masters in that, as for the current swift I suggest you to get it if you can sacrifice build, if you can wait I will prefer the one that is coming just for the build alone.

[@sugumaranv90]

So what's your best suggestion in terms of long life

[@Raveendhana]

Long life ku 4 cylinder or even number cylinder engines always better, and some of the old Suzuki engines were three cylinder thaan it was reliable, those days the power of the three cylinder engines never used to exceed more than 65 - 70 ps, but these days the non turbo ones itself is 70-90 hp, for eg the one in kiger is only 71 but kiger is a big car, and Tata punch is 83 ps, so my take is three how much ever balancing is done to reduce vibration it's all depends on the quality of the build, even brands like Mazda, Mercedes has had three cylinder but they were costly, now our Desi brands or budget brand engines are built at a cost, so the life is very much 50 /50 dhaan, specially the turbo ones la it all depends on how well the engine is built. If you wanna keep the car for 8 years or more then 4 cylinder better. Nexon does have 4 cylinder petrol but brezza has

[@BaraniP-yn5rb]

XUV 300 w2 review anna

[@praveenkumarvijay8585]

🔥🔥🔥😊

[@naveenvignesh90]

Kia carens turbo Petrol has 3 cylinder or 4 cylinder engine?

[@Raveendhana]

1.5 Inline 4

[@BisonBaby-to1dv]

7-seater ல 3 cylinder வச்சா அவ்ளோதான்..வண்டி நட்டுக்கும்!!!...

[@Raveendhana]

@@BisonBaby-to1dv unless it's a turbo

[@saranpvc4470]

​@@BisonBaby-to1dv😂😂💯

[@saranpvc4470]

​@@BisonBaby-to1dvTriber👀

[@ARAKKAN2020]

BRO, VERY GOOD INFORMATION. I USE A KIA SELTOS 1.5 HTK PETROL 4 CYL .IT GIVES 11KMPL IN CITY 15 KMPL IN HIGHWAY. ITS GOOD AND SMOOTH TO DRIVE BUT AS PER KIA THEY INSIST TO USE ONLY SHELL FUEL . FOR THE PAST 4 YEARS IT RUNS ON SHELL, BUT THE COST IS RS.119 P/L IT BURNS MY WALLET A LOT, ITS BEEN 4 YEARS SO I DECIDED TO SELL MY KIA AND DECIDED ON SKODA SLAVIA 1LTR TURBO OR KUSHAQ 1 LTR TURBO. YESTERDAY I DID A TEST DRIVE WITH SLAVIA WHERE I SAW THE SEAT VIBRATING WHERE THE CAR DID ONLY 6000KMS TILL NOW. SALES PERSON SAYS NEW CAR WILL NOT HAVE ISSUES , THE TEST CAR MET WITH AN ACCIDENT SO WE HAVE THIS . UNDER THE HOOD THE ENGINE BAY WAS NOT VIBRATING. ITS NORMAL. ??? SO IS WORTH TO GO WITH 1 LTR ENGINE OR NOT .CONSULTANTS TAKE SIDES SO WE CANT TRUST THEM. SINCE YOU SPOKE ABOUT THE ENGINES.. I THOUGHT YOU CAN GUIDE ME.. " IS IT WORTH TO GO WITH SKODA KUSHAQ / SLAVIA 1 LTR TURBO. MY MAXIMUM DRIVE THAT IS 75% IS CHENNAI CITY.. THEY SAY I CAN USE ANY PERTOL IT WILL GIVE MINIUM 13 KMPL IN CITY AND 17KMPL HIGHWAY FOR A DECENT DRIVE.ADVISE IF CAN BRO..

[@GSAutoMotives]

Reach us #9363272083

[@Raveendhana]

A 1.5 mpi from hyundai is always better than the 1 liter turbo from venue, because your 1.5 specially in the city at low speeds will not labour much because it's a 4 cylinder, 4 cylinder engines are naturally torque heavy than the 3 cylinder turbos, so if driven smoothly you will get a good mileage in the city, as for 3 cylinder turbo below the 2000 rpm the turbo will not kick in so there won't be much power generated so once the rpm exceeds 2000 the turbo kicks in this will lead to high fuel consumption as the engine boosted on and off, so ideally three cylinder turbos are best used if your usage is mostly highways where the engine does not labour at high speeds and you get good mileage. So if your usage is mostly city only na venue 1.2 4 cylinder is better than the turbo

[@Raveendhana]

Plus three cylinder by itself will vibrate more, and as the time goes not it might increase depending on the build or damping done, because three is a unbalanced engine. For me going from hyundai 1.5 to a vw group 1 liter Is downgrade and moreover shell will not do much of a difference, usually they recommend high octane petrol for high compression engines

[@gokulv6172]

Main reason for Turbo is for push. Since 75% usage in city, so traffic, when you are not gonna go high speed then turbo doesn't open up. Also when mileage is concern, Go for naturally aspired 4 cyl with hybrid technology. So solve all your requirements

[@muthukarthick5236]

If you're usage is mainly within the city, go for a 4 cyl and not 3 cyl or turbo. 4cyl does better during the snail pace movements in bumper to bumper traffic as well as it takes care of the mileage.

[@prakashkrishna6874]

3 cylinder initial pick up irukkathu...

[@vignesh.j]

Bro why Toyota engine are more reliable than other vehicles

[@villavang4799]

சரியில்லையே

[@DavidDavid-rk8rn]

Maruti Suzuki gti entha cae bro 😢

[@GSAutoMotives]

Fronx Turbo and Baleno RS turbos

[@DavidDavid-rk8rn]

Vanga bro kilii pom