Inflation is far more harmful to individuals than a collapsing stock or property market because it directly affects people's cost of living, which they immediately feel. It is not surprising that the current market sentiment is extremely pessimistic. In today's economy, assistance is critical if we are to survive.
@graywilliams_77.10 ай бұрын
I have experienced significant losses, and I am holding on with the hope of recovering them. It is evident that I am in dire need of assistance. Could you please share the name of the investment adviser who guides you?
@Larry.Roberton2 жыл бұрын
Hasn't been possible for the past fifty years. Not getting things done is normal for all government parties in Canada. Canada is a house of cards, all divided.
@totaleducation2 жыл бұрын
Well said Larry, as transnational oil and gas pipelines and refineries should have been built during the 1980s Recession. As you said, nothing ever gets done because Canada is a House of Cards....
@christopherkingsland46042 жыл бұрын
Good luck convincing JT and his gang.
@DavidMcCalister2 жыл бұрын
yup.... the Virtue Signaling idiot with yes men/women all around him are going to kill the poor along with the environment all the while giving triumphal and moralistic speeches along the way...
@paulbadics35002 жыл бұрын
Under Harper there were a dozen nat gas export terminals planned on atlantic & pacific that would be done now
@georginaofarrell92542 жыл бұрын
We need to get rid of Trudeau in order to develop our gas exports.
@turbofanlover2 жыл бұрын
Sadly, a minority of dopes (mainly from the GTA) keep re-electing this fool.
@musqul85662 жыл бұрын
Tradeau is the worst disaster that happened to Canada. Only the NDP can be worse good thing they will never be in charge.
@redred27722 жыл бұрын
Getting it past Natives and the woke leeches will be the biggest problem.
@Four20ftw2 жыл бұрын
If the Liberals were honest about climate change, they should be championing our energy sector. It’s the most ethically produced energy in the world. Also, offsetting China and Indias use of coal would greatly reduce net emissions vs the current strategy of keep it in the ground. We are a country of 38M. What about the billions that consume over seas?
@shanedinapoli22402 жыл бұрын
How have climate targets worked out for Germany?
@shanedinapoli22402 жыл бұрын
@Random Human are you a bot? Your comment is not an answer to my question and then suggests I’m not intelligent in the same sentence.
@DavidMcCalister2 жыл бұрын
@@shanedinapoli2240 Germany will fail to meet their targets because they decided to listen to some fearful environmentalists and have shut down their nuclear or are in the process of doing so. They have another 13 years of use of their reactors which would more than overcome the shortfall of Russian NG (The russian NG was used for electricity production not heating). Also that tsunami only resulted in 1 death... 1 death.... not much of a disaster. More people fall off of roofs installing solar in a week than that single meltdown did with a massive natural disaster. Your question didn't really make much sense either... not sure what the premise was.....what is Germany doing that you think Canada shouldn't?
@shanedinapoli22402 жыл бұрын
@@DavidMcCalister that is a good question. Undue reliance on imported natural gas from one source. While Canada targets climate targets virtually all of their fossil fuel supply is domestic. For example, the province of Ontario receives more than 2/3 of all of its fuel from Alberta. Similarly the US has large domestic supplies for fossil energy. California has managed many of their climate targets by importing electricity from surrounding states and oil from Alberta. The intermittent nature of green energy requires fossil fuels (principally natural gas) to ensure 99.99 grid reliability. So while Canada says it’s pursuing climate targets it’s still ensuring energy security because of its existing pipeline infrastructure. This may get tested if a critical pipeline that crosses into the United States is disrupted and the truth of an entirely green grid is revealed as too unreliable for most peoples needs.
@maxineporter8848 Жыл бұрын
they have built the LNG terminal at Wilhelmshaven in record time. Once the Russian gas flow was reduced, they have been looking for alternative gas suppliers (like the US) , and expediting their LNG terminal construction, which is now operational. Plus they are looking ahead to hydrogen infrastructure (their new pipeline to service Wilhelmshaven is expected to serve hydrogen in the future). Plus they generate a lot of solar/wind energy, and have a growing EV population.
@vishalkhanna1476 Жыл бұрын
Can we keep buying natural gas on new low?
@paulbadics35002 жыл бұрын
This guy wont be clear why LNG not built..because Trudeaus policies made it harder to build pipe & terminals
@Rawdiswar2 жыл бұрын
We have no way to currently export LNG. How can you possibly say our infrastructure is robust?
@billmcmeekin79092 жыл бұрын
Gas link is being built in my hood. It's about time! Hard to believe it's almost 2023 and only about half complete. We've been trying since 2007! The US is the wrong path. They steal our products, below market value. We need export facilities! And we need energy east completed. What intelligent country purchases energy from other countries, putting money in their pockets but not ours? US had numerous LNG facilities in the Gulf coast. Buy our gas cheap, sell theirs for profit. Energy globally is increasing. Canada needs to get involved now, like yesterday. 50% reduction in carbon emmisions also.
@bryancampbell96222 жыл бұрын
I think an LNG terminal in Churchill, Manitoba would work well for export to Germany. We would have to design it similar to Russia's arctic Yamal LNG terminal, and use icebreaker Finnish designed LNG tankers like they are using right now, but I think the shorter pipeline going through less provinces would make it worth it. Plus it would bring the economy of northern Manitoba up.
@billmcmeekin79092 жыл бұрын
@@bryancampbell9622 Very interesting Bryan. I haven't heard of this option for international export of LNG, but perhaps it's worth industry looking into it's feasibility? We definitely need international export means from our borders. We are not getting true value sending our products directly to USA solely. I've worked in industry for 24 years, and can't believe we have been left out of the market this long. Politics has left Canada weak, poorly positioned, and economically hurting our citizens. All while we could be helping this planet and people on it. I believe this has been by design making many US/international corporations wealthy. Sad indeed. Keep faith and in our once incredible nation, that it will once again be. Thanks Bryan :-)
@kabbythedog9409 Жыл бұрын
I agree with you both Canada sucks but I’m still buying your companies stocks
@maxineporter8848 Жыл бұрын
I don't think the US is "stealing" our natural gas. We are getting a pipeline out to the west coast, but that was not the case for decades. Canada has always had a problem with infrastructure (note Atlantic Canada still has to import foreign oil, due to lack of a Canadian pipeline). Pipelines point south, so that is where our oil/gas goes, to the Louisiana coast for processing and shipment. So we are using their infrastructure, and we do not receive the world price in payment from the US.
@maxineporter8848 Жыл бұрын
@@bryancampbell9622 Interesting thought to repurpose the port of Churchill. Perhaps for LNG shipment, or even "green" hydrogen which could be processed from Manitoba hydro. It is possible that with climate change the ice buildup in Hudson Bay is less and extends the shipping season? The Germans are so smart they know Canadian geography and possibilities better than we do. Thyssen Krupp has a deal with Hydro Quebec to produce "green" hydrogen. Scholz signed a deal this year to produce and ship hydrogen from Stephenville Newfoundland. They expect it to be up and running by 2025!
@paulbadics35002 жыл бұрын
Australia has 24 LNG export terminals vs Canada zero
@jogentile2 жыл бұрын
Get rid of the liberals!!
@rosedipanfilo12 жыл бұрын
As soon as you can blink your eye
@calvinduchaine55012 жыл бұрын
The LNG plant in Eastern Canada? Where's the gas gonna come from to turn into LNG ????????
@maxineporter8848 Жыл бұрын
Nowhere. Fracking not allowed in Atlantic Canada. No pipeline through Quebec. What does that leave??
@rolsson16932 жыл бұрын
Golden opportunities BUT the buffoonery in Ottawa has blown up Canada 🇨🇦. Canada could be making BANK right now !!!! Softening our recession .
@johne10712 жыл бұрын
LNG terminals. Remedy where you least expect it.
@williamhoffer92772 жыл бұрын
This was a very good, informative interview!
@majuscule8883 Жыл бұрын
I keep searching for this kind of good news for so long, but all I got was gloomy, plagued by environmentalists.
@vishalkhanna1476 Жыл бұрын
Can we keep buying natural gas on new low?
@climatehero Жыл бұрын
Quebec strangles the export of Canadian natural gas. It could be done using the Saguenay river.
@vishalkhanna1476 Жыл бұрын
Can we buy Natural gas on dips???? as the valuation is now dollar 2 a bottle of water price??
@thulatoria63042 жыл бұрын
Unemployment keeps surging and bills wait for no one that’s why we have to figure new ways to make an income, I came here to learn how to trade after listening to a guy on radio talk about the importance of investing and how he made $210,000 in 4 months from $35k. Somehow this video has helped shed light on some things, but I'm confused, I'm a newbie and I'm open to ideas
@canokmene89822 жыл бұрын
@Alerk Yana Exactly, the trick is to diversify your investment, don't panic when everyone else do and invest consistently
@saneramos63342 жыл бұрын
Does He offer mentorship tutorial?🤔
@rashfordmaguire73842 жыл бұрын
@@saneramos6334 Yes of course I've been attending his classes online, I just withdraw my profit past two days before now, glad I did invest with them and still reinvested and the trade is ongoing.
@reece57252 жыл бұрын
I have been seeing so many recommendations about Veilleux Thierry on social platforms trending, I think he must be good for people to talk about.
@Michael56272 жыл бұрын
@@reece5725 Consistency is key, I've been trading with him for months now and I've made a lot of profits using his trading strategy.
@conway2121 Жыл бұрын
200 Years worth and yet our gas bills are fkn huge, I see how this works our gas and we get screwed not everyone we sell it too nothing new in this dump.
@kjwang1203 Жыл бұрын
After LNG Canda Kitimat built, LNG tankers can go through Arctic Ocean to Europe in summer.
@rickboer77157 ай бұрын
We must get rid of Trudeau as PM for a start
@maxrob122 жыл бұрын
so which company we go all in ? LNG ?
@brianfrederickson2080 Жыл бұрын
Too bad we don’t have a Petro Canada …not American companies
@unition22262 жыл бұрын
what about converting it to another form ? aluminum is a great battery for extra energy for cleaner energy like hydro and nuclear.
@tomprovan502 жыл бұрын
never mind no nat gas to us . Sell it ourselves
@mazedar_tv Жыл бұрын
Answer is Yes, but US will not allow
@dougreed7362 жыл бұрын
My gas bill is to up 25% already all so we can be green and not to supply the world lol
@HavokBWR Жыл бұрын
@Random Human how tf is Canada refusing to produce more natural gas the cost of supporting friends? It's liberals for whatever reason intentionally creating a scarcity of energy. I don't know if they are bought off or just so br-ainw-ash-ed by the green energy types, but they are refusing to produce energy that we all desperately need. They are pure evil.
@allancole91582 жыл бұрын
Sock Boy won’t like this
@brianfrederickson20802 жыл бұрын
American oil and Gas companies want to take advantage of Canada....we may have enough gas for our own consumption for one hundred years but what if Canada is sucked dry by exports in 50 years. BIB oil propaganda is dividing Canadians on this issue. Extract it now or save it for the use of Canadians later . Americans want Canadian taxpayers to subsidize the cost of building the infrastructure to export gas for their profits. They don’t give a crap about Canada. Think long term …Besides, we would not be able to compete with Russian gas price just by the cost of getting the gas over there, at least double.. LNG vs Natural Gas pipeline close to Europe . The situation in Europe is likely to be short term if Russians are defeated.
@SharhbiniRauf2 жыл бұрын
GAS = SYNTETIC, DO NOT WASTE IT ON FUEL, OTHER SECTOR NEED MORE GAS THAN BECOME FUEL.
@Fuzzowl Жыл бұрын
The answer the the 1st question is they can't even do that for canada why bother with 9ther countries. #canadafirst
@SharhbiniRauf2 жыл бұрын
How to make vehicles run on alkali solution : ELECTROLYSIS INSIDE FUEL FILTER, AND INSIDE COMBUSTION CHAMBER BY PLASMA FROM MULTI SPARKPLUGS, JUST NEED LITTLE HACK THE ELECTRYCITY BY USE SUPERCAPACITOR AND VARISTOR, FIRST MAKE ELECTROLYSIS INSIDE FUEL FILTER first electrolysis (PEM OR PLASMA), BECAUSE GRAFITY EFFECT WATER COME FROM UNDER FUEL FILTER EFFECT WILL MAKE PRESSURE SO HYDROGEN DON'T COME BACK TO FUEL TANK BUT RIGHT INTO INJECTOR, BY INJECTING BOTH HYDROGEN AND WATER INTO INTERNAL COMBUSTION CHAMBER CHAIN REACTION (EXPLOSION MUST BEEN HAPPENING INSIDE COMBUSTION CHAMBER) BECAUSE PLASMA SPARKPLUGS WILL MAKE ELECTROLYSIS+IGNITION , THIS MEAN ALL VEHICLES ACTUALY CAN RUN AND BURN ON WATER AND HYDROGEN.
@peredavi2 жыл бұрын
Off your meds?
@josephhall10492 жыл бұрын
not happening
@robinpark3521 Жыл бұрын
Canadians seem deliberately to ignore the co-relation of Politics vs Economy ; without Political Innovation the Economy is just 'Dead Fish". They do not know what the economy is, what the Marketing is , what the Business is , what the Competition especially GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS is. Canada already lost the TIMING! Very Very Very seriously sick at the moment.
@CJ-yf5cr Жыл бұрын
Exactly, Canada probably has the same if not more natural gas and oil than Russia. Canada's territory is so vast some areas probably haven't even been properly surveyed do to the lack of investment and interest by the government. The main problem with a lot of Western countries is that they are too idealistic. They just don't seem to value practical common sense.