Getting more from Neural Amp Modeler...

HW takes a look at how to get more out of Neural Amp Modeler int he way of EQ. NAM pairs well with all sorts of other plugins and using pretty much any EQ plugin we can get a huge amount of control over out captures in NAM!
Free Nam Captures and Impulse Responses: tonejunkiestor...
Follow us on ToneHunt: tonehunt.org/T...
Get the Full pack at: tonejunkiestor...

[@petset77]

Totally different great tones with the same instrument/plugins and modeler. Well done!

[@idhindsight]

Sounds really good - what are you doing for reverb here?

[@dancrowell2933]

HW, thank you for all you do for the guitar nerd community. What audio interface do you use?

[@jesuspaez7844]

👏🏽❤️ EQ pre or post Nam?

[@shadowm3ld]

Sounds superb, HW - would be nice to put NAM into a unit. I'm really curious as to how it'll sound on the updated Kemper!

[@pb25193]

That's called tonex

[@skylermann]

How hot are you hitting the NAM? At instrument level or is there a certain DB range we should shoot for when sending signal to it? It looks like the input meter is pretty high so maybe I haven’t been giving it enough signal.

[@bradshannon862]

Thanks for all your work! Great video! Subscribed and liked!

[@alessio_tasco]

nice reverb, what did you use?

[@RobotShlomo]

Get more? I would be satisfied with GETTING THE THING TO EVEN WORK!

[@thesoozeTJ]

Can I play on the next HW record?! 🤪

[@ToneJunkieTV]

I’m happy to let you audition.

[@daniellegomez9223]

The only problem I have with your very entertaining and informative videos is those SHIRTS! MY EYES! Hahahahahahahahahaa

[@justbenji6118]

Is there already a function available for NAM to save presets? Would be amazing with the EQ

[@djabthrash]

Save the FX chain preset in your DAW

[@resington]

Excellent tone. Game over. How can anyone poo poo NAM at this point?

[@ulli61]

Thank you very much for your tutorial!

[@fin.d7725]

Did you put the EQ before or after the NAM plug-in?

[@shorerocks]

Most likely after.

[@ToneJunkieTV]

After

[@jamesshafer6700]

You sound great.

[@ToneJunkieTV]

Hey Thanks dude!

[@patmoore6061]

HW, can you tell me which studio monitors are you using when playing your captures? Since you never use headphones while filming your videos, you must use some monitors.

[@ToneJunkieTV]

Yamaha HS8s. Good deal for the money if bought used.

[@patmoore6061]

⁠so all your amp’s captures sound good with these monitors? I’m asking because up to now I’ve been only playing amp’s captures on headphones and need to try good monitors for home studio guitar playing, not only for listening to recorded music.

[@Cherry_Sunburst]

EXCELLENT.

[@ramspencer5492]

Are you experiencing a lot of latency, or is that just some kind of video/sound sync issue I'm experiencing right now? How is NAM on Oversampling and anti-aliasing?

[@bole.martinovic]

tnx! is eq before or after NAM?

[@ToneJunkieTV]

After, I probably should have mentioned that.

[@djabthrash]

@@ToneJunkieTV Yes, this is very important indeed and i asked myself the same question hehe. You should add it in the video description actually.

[@user-wv5gv3dw5u]

How hard is it to model your own amp?

[@zakklee2556]

How does the added EQ compair to an already EQ'd profile?

[@ToneJunkieTV]

The EQ in Nam is just a simple 3 band EQ. Nothing wrong with it but you can do a lot more fine tweaking with something like a parametric eq or something with the ability to do shelves. IMHO.

[@jasonalexander5253]

Very Nice HW. When I use NAM I get a ridiculous amount of latency. You seem to have absolutely none and you are going through a DAW (I presume with the EQ you are using?).

[@northern_foxx]

you shouldn't get more than using any other plugin - if you're having issues with the standalone maybe try it in the DAW too. But generally buffer < 128 @ 48khz should be pretty good latency wise - does depend on the system though.

[@jasonalexander5253]

@@northern_foxx thanx for answer. Maybe I should be in 48k in my DAW. Is that the recommended setting for using NAM?

[@northern_foxx]

@@jasonalexander5253 yep! actually its the _only_ correct setting at the moment. It's not quality related, it's because the plugin is expecting it and the data will process at the wrong rate if you don't (for now)

[@jasonalexander5253]

@@northern_foxx cheers. Makes heaps of sense. I will try that. Thanx Danimae 😎😀

[@SHOWWHITE]

Anyone knows about the actual latency performance?

[@northern_foxx]

it really depends on your hardware - otherwise it's the same as any other plugin. RTL for my setup is around 5ms (as measured) using an M1 mac and evo 4. On my primary desktop (windows) RTL is more like 8-12 ms. None of that is really NAM related though, it's just computer/interface related. NAM doesn't introduce additional latency on top of that

[@StrongBornBullies2]

Sounds awesome! Thank you HW!

[@ToneJunkieTV]

Any time!

[@Uuur10]

Great sounds 👍

[@user-ct3ml6iu4n]

anyone else having the low volume issue?

[@hodshonf]

Reaper is not free

[@djabthrash]

"kinda"

[@glennlittle7955]

True. Cheap, very very cheap, but not free.

[@bootlegnjack]

I'm something of a McGuyver myself.

[@zeppo20]

Amazing, thank you.

[@DADBENDS]

I will continue to follow you. But pls step into the sphere of hard-rock at least. Cheers