Can You Hear The Difference!? Profiled Amps Vs Real Amps

[@guitar-21]

Pete's statement that he made a couple of times is the actual fact. It's like having 5 of the same amp. Each one may have a slight variation, but they all sound fantastic. Each of these modelers has finally achieved that point where they are equivalents to the physical amp. This is even more true in the mix of a band. And the best thing about this is now guitarists with almost any budget constraints can finally get amazing tones. This is great for the future of the electric guitar and guitar-centric music.

[@JamesFlorio-ti8gc]

Back before crazy good modeler with amp clones n etc it was sooo much harder and more expensive to get the tones in our heads lol well said sir!

[@Nightjar726]

Yeah that’s why the top guitarists in the world all play modelers now. Cause Lee made a video. Lol Not so fast champ. It still has some time to go. They have got amazingly better.

[@christianhildalgo]

​@@Nightjar726Many of the top guitarists *are* playing modelers, actually. Especially in studio settings. And in death metal for example, it's super common to have the entire band play gigs on DI with modelers and no amps.

[@MrRofi-jp7mo]

@@Nightjar726LOL ignorance and arrogance is your specialty isn’t jt

[@pramesh.gurung]

@@Nightjar726 Metallica, Steve vai, Joe satriani, A7x, Def Leppard, Megadeth, Neal Schon, Steve lukathor, Plini,cory wong etc.. all uses modeler live or studio. Many touring musician uses kemper or fractal. Dunno what you meant by top guitarist though.

[@IAmChrisR]

One thing to point out about TONEX: if you have an Nvidia GPU in your PC, the Advanced capture can take less than 20 minutes. The multi-hour thing only applies when no CUDA cores are available.

[@ianedmonds9191]

That's awesome. Tonex are clearly forward thinking and smart as all hell. Using AI api on GFX cards is awesome forward thinking. Much Respect. Luv and Peace.

[@jonathankessler9853]

Call me an idiot but how does a graphics card affect the speed of a capture? Did you mean CPU* and not GPU?

[@Bozebo]

@@jonathankessler9853 No they meant GPU, GPUs have been available for a lot of processing beyond graphics for over a decade now (hence the recent rise of machine learning) but only certain software takes advantage of it. A mid range GPU can do certain processing far faster than even having 2 of the best CPUs would.

[@syrehn69]

keih?? man i need a days one on one tuition and brain picking pass

[@dezertson2011]

@@jonathankessler9853 All the hubbub about ChatGPT and other AI is driven by GPU processing. For anyone that’s interested, it’s because 3D graphics processing for games utilizes the same type of base math calculations as neural network training, matrix algebra at the most basic level. Clearly there are far more math tricks than this, but these are the math processes AI or computer graphics has to do over and over, which is why GPU’s are handy for this. They are doing the same thing to create amp captures. It’s the reason for the name “Neural DSP” that makes the Quad “Cortex” device. They are use neural network used in also AI, to train captures.

[@dlastone]

BTW, Captain kept asking why you would want to profile your own amp... I got a really nice 50's hand-me-down that my dad bought new, great little amp that I don't want to lug around, so I got me some tonex... very happy with it.

[@RICO_SUAVE21]

I’d go buy a bunch super expensive amp profile them and then return the expensive amps.😊

[@Espresso101]

​@@RICO_SUAVE21somewhat pointless as it's very likely that the expensive amp you're looking at already has a hundred profiles uploaded from other users with more expensive microphones, preamps, and interfaces too.

[@C33Fernandez]

@@Espresso101 This is a great point, as the benefits in these digital platforms aren't only in the accuracy and practicality of the actual devices, it's also in the community-based resourcing and contributions.

[@JohnvanCapel]

​@@RICO_SUAVE21 NGL, I can legitimately see gear-rentals experiencing a short-term increase in business from people doing exactly this, if the tech takes off - rent an amp and cabinet for a day, profile it, and keep the sound of that amp for as long as the data survives.

[@bmxriderforlife1234]

​@@RICO_SUAVE21lol a industry person I know might be letting me profile their dumble and train wreck amps on top of letting me physically clone them. Like full on studio gear level profiling.

[@IAmChrisR]

You guys should post the profiles/captures you made. At least for the TONEX! :)

[@balticvolt]

Funny, I just blindly picked the 4 and it is the HeadRush Prime which sounds so good. I just ordered it and I am so happy, thanks for the video!

[@Willl_b_]

I appreciate you guys going through the trouble making these types of videos. they're a lot of fun to watch. thank you!

[@RaviSingh-ph2uw]

Yes, like Lee said it’s so much easier to plug into an amp, but this way we get to play through a virtual Marshall JCM one day and a Fender Twin the next then a 5150 the day after. TBH if I was a professional guitarist and I’d like a Tonex in the studio and a quick and simple plug and play amp for small gigs.

[@halofour01]

Nailed it. I bought one of these to play through amps I'll never afford.

[@RaviSingh-ph2uw]

@@shumailkhan7205 I’d most likely go for an orange or victory head for a super clean sound with a few pedals to dirty it up. I have a Marshall 1965A-4x10 cab to pair with either.

[@Burkhimself]

@@halofour01 that’s why I got a fractal 🤘🏼….plus easy and portable

[@Burkhimself]

I haven’t watched the end of the vid yet, but #2 sounds like the real amp to my at least at 26:04

[@martyshwaartz971]

I love the the idea of profilers, but it seems to lack the ability to adjust sounds on the fly. With the price though I really need to try out this tonex thing.

[@Imsopathetic]

Grabs popcorn for the inevitable kemper vs. quad arguments. Welcome to thunderdome.

[@sacredgeometry]

Neither: Axe Fx

[@heavybrett-al4082]

😂 two units enter....only one unit leaves!

[@vincentbourely71]

Fractal everyday everytime 😅

[@questlive2338]

Kemper is the George Foreman of profiling units - we write him off as being too old and bam! Wins back the heavyweight title.... with that being said - Kemper was definitely the worst in this shootout - it was actually the only one I knew for sure was a profiler.

[@shadrackperez7325]

Great video guys

[@infn8loopmusic]

Thanks for taking time and consideration to creating and publishing this eye opening video. I think the biggest challenge with doing these comparisons is that perception of volume becomes a big factor. It's been shown that if the sounds are very similar, whichever one sounds louder will seem to have better ratings from the listeners.

[@johnnewton1830]

Given volume is easy to adjust then it doesn't really matter which you choose based on sound.

[@guitar-21]

@@johnnewton1830 yes, but his point is that one of the clean profiles was a little quieter than the other (to my ears) which made it sound a little "less." But I agree with you, if this is the only difference, then buy the one you like, crank it up, and go for it!

[@andrewcrawley285]

I love these videos were you can see Lee and Pete losing the will to live, slowly but having to persist

[@timwrigley54]

I guessed the real amp and kemper correctly. I own a QC (purchased from Andertons!) and thought it was 4 because of the way it reacted on clean with the drive pedal. Was actually surprised but pleased that QC was 5! I think all are good options and without A/B comparison I wouldn't know anything. The main obvious benefit of the modellers is i spent £1600 on a QC and now i have got a collection of virtual amps which would cost £50,000+ for the real amps which i cant afford and don't have space for. So far i have profiled precisely nothing myself and paid nothing for all the downloads. Thanks Neural and the Cortex cloud users!

[@Flopster2632]

I thought the toneX closeness to the amps sound (probably why it takes an age to profile) was surprisingly accurate! I think realistically tone, sound, feel are all subjective and if you like one thing or the other it’s not wrong just as long as you’re playing

[@dwiii1635]

It's actually quite fast depending on the GPU in the computer. I've seen advanced option only take 15-20 minutes with a RTX 4090 GPU and R9 7950x CPU.

[@bmxriderforlife1234]

​@@dwiii1635yeah but a 4090 ain't cheap.

[@Sylvain44]

Loved that you did this, the first Tonex video was really overlooking how awesome this device is. Lee did a video where he said that the best desktop/home setup was an amp and a Torpedo Captor, but now I really think it's just a guitar and a Tonex pedal. FYI, for me it takes less than 15min for an Advanced training capture, not 4-5h, but it depends on the computer. In the blind test I got 3 out of 5 (real, tonex, QC), I was pretty sure about the QC as it always has more gain when capturing, real vs tonex was just luck as they were both incredibly close. I thought that the Kemper sounded pretty bad in the chug test.

[@halofour01]

Great video as always guys! One point that I think you may not be considering... I bought one of these because I want to play through amps I'll never see in person or be able to afford. I have a selection of lower priced amps like a 6505+, JCM900, Krank Rev Jr and some others that I managed to find used. I'm never going to find an affordable Diezel Herbert or an SLO100 or a Bogner Shiva (and the list goes on for a while). I don't gig, I rarely even jam with friends and I have some real amps going into 4x12 cabs. I still bought a modeling tool so I could get other people's models of amps I'll never own. I haven't really heard you mention much about that aspect of the devices. fyi... I don't futz around with knobs either. I don't even use pedals!! I plug straight into the front of every amp I own. However, once I twiddle around for a few hours I can create complex cool effects heavy presets to mess with occasionally while still just plugging into the front of one thing. ...just some food for thought on a use case you may not relate to. Cheers!

[@Prometheus4096]

Finding an affordable expensive amp isn't the issue. The odds that you can buy an extremely rare limited number custom shop boutique amp is way higher than you having the ability to properly set up and mic your real amp in the way these profiled amps were already set up for you by a professional with decades of experience. Sure, it won't matter if you need sound in the room. But if you want to record that sound, then this is huge. Instead of buying two expensive mics, put them both at different positions near the cab, and then mixing then both in the right way with expensive preamps, you can just send the amp profiling sound straight to your PC and record it. And it will be almost identical to how the pro set up the real amp.

[@bardsamok9221]

​@@Prometheus4096 money is an issue in the vintage amp game. And sometimes volume

[@bobthejohnsson]

for me Amp 1 was so clearly the Kemper. The change in eq is really recognizable. I owned the Kemper, Quad Cortex (which I found having too much bass) and now still have the Tonex as addition to my two real amps. As something to just play with in a studio, that things for all reasons mentioned such a good thing to have in your kit and one that is available to all. They have done a great job! I still like the Kemper for its old school looks and amazing how they keep on reinventing themselves.

[@paulslack4303]

You can hear Lees heart breaking when he realises tube amps are not the only great sound out there 😂

[@chopperdeath]

Right. Put the modeler in an old tube amp shell and be done with it. Looks right, sounds right.

[@isaacvelasco6498]

Exactly, all these old heads think they hear major differences between a modeling units and actual amps when they're actually listening with their eyes

[@Dr.Jekyll]

@@isaacvelasco6498what an ageist comment. Old heads? Pray tell, what exactly does that mean? Also, compare a modeler going through studio speakers to a head through 4X12 at moderate level and you “feel” the difference. Age has nothing to do with it, name-caller. It’s about physics. Have you heard of physics?

[@tusharjamwal]

​@@Dr.JekyllYou could use a power amp and a 4x12 with any of these though

[@Dr.Jekyll]

@@tusharjamwal I agree with you. But I don’t think the jerk who made ageist comments is listening at levels loud enough to move a lot of air. And I doubt he has a 4x12. You make a valid point, though, and I agree with it. I don’t think many modeler users do that, though. The obvious point I want to stress is that, without an amp, there is nothing to model.

[@MichaelChapman123]

Well done gentlemen... Can you guys do a shoot out of FRFR cabinets. Headrush vs. Laney Vs. Line 6 vs. ???? Is there a difference ... Thanks, and Greetings from Georgetown Ontario Canada :)

[@twineddropf.i.5594]

as pete said, the tonex software standalone is incredible thanks to the tonenet, as a hobbyst guitarist who can't get cabs and valve amps for volume problems im sooooo much happy to get even an 80% accurate profile of a real big amp. i can't spend enough good words for all the people that spend time profiling their amps and sharing it to us casuals for free on the tonenet

[@LordBransty]

I have thin walls and neighbours the size of gorillas. I can't agree with you enough.

[@twineddropf.i.5594]

@@LordBransty yeah i think in my case is a problem because i live in italy, basically in an old city like rome or naples (where i live) single houses are not as common as in america, 90% of the average population lives in condominiums, the only ways to get privacy are: 1. You buy a villa in residentials places (which is crazy expensive) 2. You buy an entire building 3. You go in the countryside but then you lose all city comforts and can't get to work without doing 40 kilometers minimum.

[@Guitaural.]

Thanks for suffering through this process guys...lol. I knew you'd do a deep dive on Tonex Lee. If you've got a lot of pedals already and just want a variety of amazing amp tones, it's a solid option. And a plugin...cool little device. So great to be able to play a cranked Marshall stack at a whisper volume...lol.

[@Dan_Ranger]

Great video. I’ve used them all. Gigged most of them and they all do the job depending on the work or gig. The bottom line is what’s your favourite tool and what’s best for the job? I’ll use all of them my favourite “tool” will always be a tube/valve amp and couple of pedals. It’s the whole playing experience. But going in ears I prefer the the Kemper or QC. No better time to be a guitar player considering what I had when I started. Find a tone and play more and leave the knobs alone. Option paralysis is a thing.

[@michaelsnydermusic]

Thanks guys. That looked difficult. If I owned one of these it would be for the profiles other folks did. Or if I had a friend with a great amp I’d consider it. But I’m happy with my Helix LT. Bought it when it was considered “old” and got a floor model. It sounds great and works for what I need it for. Thanks again!

[@MarsHottentot]

I went for the Tonex. What's crazy is that the real amp stuck out a bit so that I thought it was a profile😂 Ultimately, any differences could be ironed out with eq - IN MY PERSONAL OPINION

[@Prometheus4096]

Using an EQ to adjust to profile so it sounds like the real amp defends the purpose. That's what the modeller is supposed to be doing for you. Any really skilled person can adjust two amps with EQ and other settings to make them sound really similar. It just takes a ton of work and skill. I wonder if the Kemper was badly profiled because it did sound quite different, but it did seem to have more richness to it that some of the other modellers who were closer in EQ terms were missing.

[@Wadey1960CS]

I actually have all of these they've tested except the Headrush prime. The ToneX isn't bad for the price at all, Great job IK Multimedia. The Quad Cortex is really like buying a half-baked Apple Pie that shares all your social media info. Compared to others in the same price range, not enough bells and whistles. Actually sold it, wasn't impressed at all. I think I'll hang on to my 11 year old tech in the Kemper, that's holding it's own and in some cases spanking that hind-end against said new tech. German tech is always top notch. Great Video Cap and Pete! Well worth the watch regardless.

[@bjarketraberg-andersen8895]

I liked number 3 and 5 the most, both the first and second time. I heard it through my Genelec 8040´s (Same as them), and I have to say i was really surprised by the sound and a bit disappointed that the Kemper wasn´t my favorite (especially as I own a Kemper myself). Great video, cheers guys.

[@Prometheus4096]

It needs to sound like the original amp. Not different but better. If your original amp sounds like shit, your modeling amp should also sound like shit. Because if it doesn't, it can't accurately capture a great sounding amp either.

[@Jonw8222]

I've never owned anything with amp captures before, I've always been more of a modelling or real amp kind of player but this video just showed why I purchased a ToneX recently. At the price you really can't say no. It's got some of the best sounds I've ever heard and I'm shocked to be able to have picked one up for such low money. The capturing is a pain but to purchase or download other people's captures and have them in such a small package. It's sort of a hybrid between a Strymon Iridium and a QC. The only downside is that the tones aren't tweakable like a real amp or model is, but the tones themselves are a step above modelling in my opinion. It's like the tone of a real amp but without being able to tweak it. Which is fine as long as you capture it with the right settings in the first place. I made some notes during the blind tests.. I knew straight away that Kemper was 1 because it has a slight harshness and nasally midrange boost. It's not a bad sound but it adds it's own flavor to the capture. I'm shocked that 2 was the real amp, I thought it was Headrush Prime. I liked 3 the most and thought it was the real amp. I thought 4 and 5 were ToneX and QC. I thought QC was 5 because I thought it sounded slightly better. I was wrong and ToneX was 3 (a nice surprise) but what was consistent is that 3 and 5 sounded similar and both sounded very good. This has been the case for the last few months whenever I hear these shootouts. I just thought in this case, that 3 sounded the best. It's hard to explain.. it sounded organic and when digging in it sounded good without sounding digital, bright or overly harsh. The capturing is faster if you have a NVIDIA video card. But even if you don't, you can enjoy the pedal without ever capturing anything. The software can be annoying but once disconnecting it from the PC.. the tones you take with you on the pedal are very good. If the people doing the capturing know that they are doing, it's even better. The tech in this area is advancing very quickly, it's like.. the newer the technology, the higher resolution the capture is.. if that makes sense. But what is odd is that they are figuring out ways to make an accurate capture but also make it sound better than the original amp. In this case I thought 3 and 5 both sounded better than 2. And you could even argue that 4 sounded better as well.

[@BuddyBlues]

At 36:14 you can immediately see that Pete used to be the kid that cheated off your homework in school and double checked his work afterwards 😂😂😂😂

[@danishpete]

100% 😂😂😂

[@streetwiserhapsody]

In my opinion, you should make a video comparing real amps vs the digital stuff BUT DO NOT REVEAL which is which, wait a few weeks until people give out their answers. Do the reveal in a separate video.

[@kiljoy3254]

Yes; let’s see the annoying ‘experts’ show just how expert they really are

[@kiljoy3254]

And do the DSM Humbolt Simplifier MLK II

[@RaviSingh-ph2uw]

This is a great idea to weed out all the “experts” who say they can hear the difference. (AFTER the results were revealed 😂)

[@JosePineda-jn8jk]

They would blame it on a mic recording the amp as the problem. Then the “if I was there in the room” arguments would start. You can’t argue with people who know everything 😂

[@Drtydeeds]

These shootouts are all over KZbin if you look.

[@SlackWi]

Really should have included neural amp modeller (NAM) in this since its literally free and incredible

[@florenttenryu5011]

You did a great job, very interesting to follow. In a live situation, with drums, bass and vocals, an average listener won't notice a difference. I wonder who will buy a real amp now...

[@weakattheknees_]

From a producer perspective, owning any one of these devices and potentially having loads of high end amp profiles that sound 95% like the real thing is a no brainer. Obviously the real amps are that tiny bit better, but cost-wise it’s diminishing returns unless you stick to one amp. Plus the casual listener won’t notice the small details in difference between digital and tube.

[@MrRofi-jp7mo]

‘Better’ is entirely subjective and can’t eq fix any remaining differences?

[@sub-jec-tiv]

Pretty close, yeah. I find it hilarious that most people can now afford gear that’s in most cases superior in sound quality to what the Floyd had when they recorded Dark Side. But they act like only the most expensive stuff is worth using. Ridiculous. Go make music.

[@dlastone]

wow, they are so close now, you can hear some differences, especially top end... I liked 4 for crunch & 3 for clean.... surprised to find out which was the real amp. Cool comparison

[@400_billion_suns]

16:50 The time it takes for TONEX to train a model is entirely dependent on the GPU of your computer. If you have a recent Nvidia GPU like an RTX4-- series, it does not take anywhere near 5 hours to train the advanced models. But if all you have is a laptop that doesn’t even have a discrete GPU, then yes, it will take a long time.

[@Gummmibaer]

It uses the GPU? Wow, shows me how little my knowledge of computers is.

[@SuperPol1981]

@@Gummmibaer GPUs are often used for complex calculations. Cryptocurrency mining for example. Or a more positive contribution for society: proteine folding (folding@home project).

[@markntexas8265]

@@GummmibaerAI is very GPU dependent ChatGP uses racks of NVIDIA GPUS very fascinating

[@dezertson2011]

Yes this was the brilliance of the Tonex solution. People like me can buy a less expensive unit and just purchase other people’s captures, but even the capture unit is cheap if you have a computer, which most people do. Totally a smarter solution that forcing people to spend $1500 to get the basics.

[@hughJ]

Yeah, IK recommends a Maxwell (Nvidia 900 series) GPU or newer, so any Nvidia GPU since ~2014 should be able to get the training time down to minutes rather than hours. Granted that a lot of creative professionals seem to own Apple computers (which don't have Nvidia GPUs), so I can see this being a problem for many. Nvidia has a pretty good strangle hold on AI training and inference acceleration, so any new applications with AI acceleration are going to be Nvidia by default for the foreseeable future. That said, for most people it's not like you're going to be capturing amps on a weekly basis -- it's something you do a couple times for your own gear and getting to download everyone else's.

[@shawnveneziano9013]

Thanks guys! I always love hearing Pete's playing in the morning and I love Pete's enthusiasm when trying these out! I just got a Headrush myself and I'm so excited to see you all playing it and hearing how it stacks up against the competition. I'm gonna keep playing along and listening now :)

[@Tije.O]

ToneX software seems really great in the home studio. Just profile your amps or use one of the existing ones and hear yourself play in context of the recording without an amp blasting in the same room (with a mic in front). It sounds impressive. For playing out live, nothing beats a real amp imo.

[@markntexas8265]

Run the Tonex through a Katana Artist and boom real whatever amp you want Dumble Plexi Two Rock …..

[@Tije.O]

@@markntexas8265 I would like to try it and see how it feels / sounds. If one doesn't have a good (tube) amp than this is a good option. I don't like how tonex 'removes' the cab from a lot of profiles by using some kind of algorithm / interpretation. There's something a little off there I feel. The 'amp only' profiles are really good. I only tried the free version so far, so maybe the paid version is better, but I like your suggestion. Would love to try it, maybe paired with a simple class d amp through a cab.

[@65pancakes82]

I use tonex ALL the time, at home. Its good, and a fantastic tool.(vst) I Bring the real amp to the real band.

[@DanielC__]

Wow…what a great vid! Well done guys. The day of profile amps being dissed just because is over and it had for a while. This just proves it again.

[@colej3360]

Before seeing results I liked 2 & 3 on both amps. 3 had a warm, tube-like tone imo. Very impressed!

[@j79-p9u]

My conclusion, as i kinda expected: they all get the job done well enough sound-wise to be viable options...its down to price, other features and personal preferences really.

[@John-e4p1x]

Newsflash: if its close enough you need to have a video like this, its CLOSE ENOUGH. To the viewers.

[@trevorD1156]

Glad to see they thought the tonex captures are almost indistinguishable, cause it's the one I have. Lee is right I'd still rather play through my real amps and 2x12 cab. However, if I wanna record and use two amps(specifically two of my amps) then capturing them and running the models in amplitude is so much simpler. Or if I wanna play at night I could use a tube amp, attenuator, and ir into headphones but I'd rather save my tubes and use the computer model.

[@Prometheus4096]

Obviously a cabinet that really moves all the air in the room is going to be more fun to play than a pair of headphones or studio monitors. That's true regardless of if an amp is the original or modeled. If they are indistinguishable, they should be indistinguishable both through headphones and through a 2x12 cabinet. So wtf are you talking about?

[@LEUNN_]

Lee is comedy with his reactions lmao got him reevaluating the amount of tube amps in stock

[@TheNeers71]

This is insane! I thought the real Amp sounded the least good for both!!!! And the cheapest was my favorite!

[@stevenolsen3162]

Fresh into this I'm going 2 or 4 before the reveal... and...... Woot! I was on 4 early but something in the mids drew me to 2 especially with the Dane engaged.. They all sound pretty good though. I thought the Headrush sounded the most natural when we could see the brands as well.

[@woof9408]

I can't get enough of these!

[@TheMcmansilla]

13:10 have you ever pick up an voc AC30.... trough 3 floors?? thats why its nice to capture

[@robyoung2755]

I really enjoy and learn from each of your videos! For this comparison, I feel there were too many variables. I would like to see the comparison done with the playing re-amped to take away any variation and use more intentional riff sequences (both rhythm and lead). The use of the pedal in front adds more variance that works against the A/B/C/D/E. As a result, I liked the Tonex but can you just do the captures of JTM45, SLO100 (or PT100) ... and save me the trouble!!! Thx again!

[@aaronshortmusic]

Excellent comparison video. That’s how it should be done.

[@hollywoodactress]

Ok I played along with headphone on through a laptop. I agree what Pete said, man this is hard and they all sound good. All slightly different but all good. So for the Lil Sister comparison I went for 1. Tone X 2. Neural 3. Kemper 4. Headrush 5. Amp During the chug test, I liked them all but would go for No.1. For the Victory test, it was even closer for me. My preference was either No3 or No5. So I won't spoil it for others, you got to watch to see what the answers are :)

[@bradswanson6788]

Thanks for putting in the effort to make this comparison.

[@benmmurray]

Great video! Thanks for going to the effort to do this!

[@ianedmonds9191]

I have a 2x12 cab taking signal from my Origin 20 or my valvestate 100. I have them running through a really amazing Audiostorm HotBox Attenuator that allows me to run the amps at quite a high load but not an ear shattering volume. It can handle all sorts of volumes and Attenuation modes. Really trick unit. Wholeheartedly recommend. Best Amp setup I've ever had. I used to use Amplitube with a very low latency soundcard Terratec 1010LT down at about 4ms coming out through Mission Pro SM25As. Very loud and quote bass responsive powered monitors, Sounded good but getting proper valve amps and a proper speaker cab has changed my mind. The immediacy of turning on your amp and hearing noise will always trump having to boot the computer and set up a channel in Ableton. I've yet to record with this setup but damn is it inspiring. Luv and Peace.

[@leokrissandy5579]

i'm convinced with the tone x now, it's crazy considering you can get them for fracture of a price of hr and ndspqc

[@techincolor]

My favorite sounds were 1 and 3. I really thought 4 was the ToneX because it sounded much less open than the others. 5 being the QC is odd. It wasn't necessarily bad but it didn't blow me away either. I much preferred the ToneX for example. Great video guys

[@dezertson2011]

I made a similar comment to Pete Thorn on his channel about the Tonex vs the real amp. And he replied that he felt it was the opposite, and that the Tonex was more open and less compressed than the real amps. I deferred to his opinion. 😂

[@John-e4p1x]

@@dezertson2011 I have tonex it is ver "open" sounding.

[@adymatt334]

I find it interesting that I have the complete opposite opinion than you. 1 is the worst for me and 3 is second worst.

[@Willl_b_]

me at home cannot tell a difference. and PETE you have developed a GREAT Captain Swat movement with your hand, i love to see it! and nothing makes you two blokes swat harder than when a digital unit is indistinguishable from the real thing! love ya'll :D

[@SomeDudeDan]

That was awesome, thanks guys for your hard work! There is a new amp modeler, profiler out, the Neural Amp Modeler (NAM), it is an open source software, it can do what all of these pedals do, but completely free. I hope one day you are going to make a new video including NAM.

[@PacificNatureTV]

they wont cuz they cant make money off it. thats why no major brands want to even support NAM captures.

[@Riff_Rafster]

You had me at "Get to the chopper!" LOL!

[@akc5150]

Just so you know... Some of those 'capture' tones sent my Bengal kitten totally nuts!! Thanks for that!! 🤣🤣

[@seanrosedotcom]

Great video~! Thank you so much for investing the time. It truly does show how far modeling has come. It's crazy good. Still for sitting in a room playing, I want an amp. To hop on a plane, give me the modeler~!

[@circlemover]

what I hear on KZbin and what you hear live is completely different...but I trust your honest opinions. I'm in the buy an amp and cab bracket for live and an amp and load box for recording to make your own sound, after all that's what it is really about - your own sound.

[@dsapasd]

For the QC, can you explain why there was a very audible "fatness" difference when switching between real amp and profile right after doing the captures, but not during the blind testing?

[@drichcymru]

Running PC into Yamaha RX A2040 Amp with Bowers and Wilkins DM601S3 speakers. For both tests I ruled out number one straight away as it lacked dynamics and had a sibilance that was unpleasant at times. To my ears I liked number 3 (Tonex) for the Friedman test as it was smoother and more refined than the others. For the Victory test they sounded really good and I struggled to pick any of them outright except for ruling out number 1.

[@TheChainsofAlice]

My favorites were the same as the captains! Fun video my dudes!

[@cakeslashdog]

I did 2, 3, 5. Not trying to guess which was real. But in order of preference. Time to try the tonex.

[@TheOligoclonalBand]

They all sounded good. The big advantage of all of these: I can have my amp sound anywhere. I love my valve gear, but it gets harder and harder to justify having big valve amps. My next project may be to just profile my favorite amp sounds and don't even switch on the valve gear anymore because it's not necessary.

[@halofour01]

I was never able to get a guitar sound I was remotely happy with so I never recorded guitar until I bought a little Line6 PodGo!! I created a few presets and double track with those presets panned hard left and right and it sounds awesome!! As much as I love to chug through a 4x12, I love the tech stuff too!!

[@Jim_Cox]

If you revisit the Tonex at all please consider some testing of it as a pre-amp into a clean power amp then into a cabinet. Some of us are luddites and don't have DAWs and studio speakers set up but do have cabinets and amps around. Right now I'm using my Tonex into the FX Loop of a Fender Mustang GTX but I would like to find out if buying a Seymour Duncan PowerStage amp would be worth it for going straight from my pedalboard into a 1x12 (or 2x12) cabinet. Eventually I should break down and get FRFR speakers but I'm not sure which way to go right now.

[@teknomanning]

Give that effects loading guy some love😊👍🏿❤

[@michaelweiss1531]

Today I tried my AMT Bulava preamp for 150 Euro and it sounds very good. In the future I will get a Tonex to capture my Rocktron Voodu Valve 😊

[@carwynvan]

Didn't have a clue at all for the cleans. But for the high gain: 2/3 was my favourite sounding, not a clue which was the real one, but had a really good guess that 1 was the kemper because it just seems to have a high end roll off (Glenn Fricker recently did a similar comparison in a high gain application and the kemper stood out like a sore thumb).

[@TheDancingSaxophone]

Regarding the average person likely not profiling their own equipment, I profiled my amp (3rd Power British Dream) with a Rode NT-1 and it sounds amazing and I use it for every gig. What my Quad Cortex has done for me is let me use my amp, my overdrive and boost pedals, and QC’s effects and have an entire rig in one box. Edit to include: I also captured all of the amp tones in one day- the first time I tried and it was so easy! I messed up the gain on the first capture attempt but every one after was bang on immediately. Probably took around an hour all told.

[@electronik808]

Now we want another tonex video :-)

[@bats__]

The first time you did this was the video that made me buy a kemper. No regrets

[@chrisjs6123]

Well I was totally wrong. I like 1 and 5 most on both and 2 the least. I’ve got Qc as well as a couple of old school hand wired amps (Benson Monarch and Achillies Zephyr). The QC gets the most use. Just so easy.

[@ianedmonds9191]

I think the only way to distinguish is in the slightly compressed sounds of the Models. I couldn't really hear it in the second amp but the first it was pretty clear. Very amazing models all. Listening here on Genelec 8030s. 🙂 Luv and Peace.

[@willjohnson2511]

On the clean amp I didn't have a clue. On the driven amp I chose 2 and though 2 sounded the best. There is just something on the Tele bridge pickup that sounds special through valves for me when overdriven.

[@sacredgeometry]

39:55 Also: Can we stop pretending like modellers cant be used exactly like a normal amp with a PA and through a normal cab please. There is nothing stopping you using them that way if you want that in the room sound just disable the simulated cab you have that. The capturing thing is an optional feature on these units. You can use all of them exactly like a normal amp (i.e. plug in and turn on) and never have to use that feature. Hell you can use one amp profile/ model on them and only ever tweak the EQ if thats what you want. Hell you could build a simple midi audio input panel and hide the rest of the device behind an pretend amp head if you cant get over it being digital. Hell add some light up fake tubes ... its a poor investment and OTT but you have that option because you are not losing any options going digital, only gaining them. Sound quality used to be a thing but now even emulations of real amps are so close to the originals thats not even a debate most people are having. Some people are clinging onto feel but most blind A/B/C tests prove they either cant tell the difference or worse prefer the digital modellers. Its done, the datas in. Get which ever you want but to pretend like analog/ tube amps are better is a progressively and demonstrably more incorrect position.

[@bardsamok9221]

Equally to pretend that valve amps are obsolete is ridiculous. Some like the convenience of amp sims, others like having an amp. They are not the same. One just sounds somewhat like the other under certain conditions. If you have a link for a strat edge of break up sounding as good or better on amp SIM I'll buy you a coffee. Blind test welcome. High gain confuses people because it's mainly distortion.

[@sacredgeometry]

@@bardsamok9221 I can absolutely do that. Great edge of break up tones arent hard on modern amp sims.

[@MrJingles021]

I want to see how the Tonex takes pedals. I'd consider getting one if i knew it could take my overdrives and high gain pedals well.

[@theLME27]

I have had the Tonex for some time and for pedals I would say, as cliche as it sounds, it depends on the model. I run a Matchless and paired with my Fuzz or TS pedals it sounds awesome, but I hate the way my Rat sounds through it. The Tonex cloud makes it my favorite version of these modelers on the market today.

[@Kartrampage]

I have a Kemper Amp and it´s the best for me. The Kemper Amp is ultra flexible with no noticeable latency and I can pick up the sound anywhere to resample it or just mix in the effects after recording. The most important thing is that I don't have to worry about the software update being bug free because the Kemper Amp has been around since 2011 and they know what they are doing.

[@johnneiberger]

This is crazy. My favorites were 1 and 3, and the real amp was my least favorite. I did not expect that at all.

[@thelowlifex9437]

I think it qll sounded pretty legit. My question is , can you use the tonex with a normal cab?

[@AtifMetal]

No, you need a power amp as well

[@JohnvanCapel]

Not on its own - but there are discrete power-amp pedals that are meant to take a multieffect's output and put it through a passive guitar cab.

[@thelowlifex9437]

Thanks for your replies ! Really appreciated :)

[@hybrydsanity5857]

I have a Tonex with an original Headrush with no modeling I use them together sounds cool because you can put Tonex via send and return of the Headrush in the chain and put pedals before and after the Tonex , so this could keep older Headrush pedal board owners from crying .they all sound good to me I wouldn't mind owning any of these units you demoed and compared , If I were starting from scratch I would go with the HR Prime because of price all the features and familiarity , Also I'm still attached to real tube amps. so it's all just a back up and optional world to me as of now and a new Hobby Lol.thanks great Video

[@Russell_Optics]

When it is that difficult to tell them apart it simply means they are all good in my opinion. Personally, I prefer to plug into a real amp and it's what I've done for 30+ years and I enjoy it. If it benefits you in any way to go with a profiler it just boils down to cost, convenience, and options. No bad choice here in my opinion.

[@519MaLoNeY]

Wow. Shocking. Thanks guys.

[@DoSeOst]

Wow, I liked 2 & 3 best and just guessed that 2 would be the real amp but not with much confidence. 5 was also very close for me. 1 & 4 lacked a bit of highs for the Friedmann amp on my speaker set. I have to rewatch with headphones later. Each sound for itself was totally fine. I would go on stage with any of these. When I play I am very sensitive to latency so I would have to test that. But from what I have heard, that's not a big problem for these devices.

[@uktmaxx]

most people aren't going to profile many amps... bought profiles are what will be used mainly, and in that case no profiling required :)

[@davidlavin4774]

Any chance you can share the Quad Cortex capture via the Neural app? I'm a QC owner, but have to say the Friedman capture seems disappointing, at least in the post capture test. Seemed better on the real tests, though.

[@mrcoatsworth429]

We've long reached the point where you don't need to choose between these based on the tone, but more based on what interface you like (touch screen, no screen, knobs...), size, flexibility, budget,... I like the small format of the Tonex and I like that you can basically use it like a three channel amp. Also, great price. It bothers me a bit that it doesn't have an XLR out. But then again, it doesn't have an FX loop, so reverbs etc. would go after it anyways and then you'd also need a DI box.

[@peterjessop1878]

I preferred the Kemper (1). All the others were pretty similar with more low mids/bass similar to the real amp. The Kemper added some snap to the sound. Personally I still prefer modellers as you can tweak the sound to your taste rather than going for realism. I don't want my sound to be real, I want it to be good.

[@musicdriven888]

I’m still watching, and I like #3 the best. Have not read any comments , nor have I heard any other opinions

[@jaredlowry3547]

You really gotta know what you’re doing to get decent profiles of your own amps on the Kemper. I’ve tried it a couple of times and mine always turned out sounding like crap.

[@Drtydeeds]

So you're saying knowing how to use your gear is important to using your gear? Profound.

[@jaredlowry3547]

@@Drtydeeds I’m just saying plugging in your amp and hitting “Profile” doesn’t usually result in a great sounding profile. Most companies that offer Kemper profiles use world-class preamps, compressors, etc. and do some serious tweaking afterwards.

[@lawrencewoody3544]

Why would you profile your own amp? For touring or live shows of course! Or recording audio. Not having to lug things around, worry about the setup, the mic placement, all supremely valuable.

[@moskitoh2651]

As a pro to sell the profiles, so that I can play amps, I could never afford!

[@trevorD1156]

Yea seems like an airhead statement from Pete, who I'm sure I've heard talk about using modelers for gigs. Maybe I just wanna use clean from one amp drive from a 2nd and hi Gain from a 3rd. Or wanna run stereo amps without all the extra gear and cables. The capture process is annoying but if you've spent 1000+ on a good tube amp(or several amps) then it's worth the time to capture them, particularly if you've modified or upgraded your amps.

[@robertjones1870]

The captains resigned pick throw at 36:02 says it all!

[@truthfactreality6814]

Tried the quad cortex and the tone x. Tone x is clear winner as it takes pedals exactly the same. Sometimes if I use the tone x through monitors I lean over to switch my real amps and captor x off by mistake it’s that good

[@benallmark9671]

Lol , you better get your ears checked.

[@truthfactreality6814]

@@benallmark9671 I’m correct

[@truthfactreality6814]

@@benallmark9671 turns out the tone x basically one. I tested for a long time

[@eklectrikmusic]

Lee, sounding soulful with yer licks man.

[@michaelvarney.]

2 and 5 were my favorites for both… I own 4 and 5. 1, 3 and 4 was close to last on all for me in about that order.

[@gtoger]

It's just getting harder and harder to tell what's real and what's not. OTOH, is a great sound still "special" if you can just dial it up on demand? As advanced as gear has become (modeling, guitars, etc) is there still any of the equation left to an individual's fingers? It's a lot to absorb.

[@yurita1984]

You should test all this capturing devices against VST like Neural Amp Modeler 🎉

[@grilledspaghetti]

We've gotten to a point where I prefer the Captain's playing over Danish. The Captain now plays exactly what I'd be playing. No joke, it's like being there.

[@65pancakes82]

Thanks for the blind shootout. The Tonex vid with Jon was not good. Nice to hear without bias. With a decent PC, Tonex will advance profile in 15 minutes.

[@edguitarguitar]

The profiles should give an accurate snap shot of the amp/pedal setup, that's the nature of the beast! Surely the difference comes into play when you start changing the "amp" eq after profiling. That does not get captured. Or do I mis-understand the process of capture? Someone enlighten me! Love the vid as always!

[@moskitoh2651]

At least with the Kemper, profiling is an art. Pros can create profiles, I do never achieve! So: No it seems to be not that simple...

[@tisbonus]

Alright, I'm 19 mins in. During the capture process, how can I put this into words. Did ALL the modelers sound different than the amps to everyone else? Am I placebo'd because I watched the capture process. Observing the experiment and becoming type of thing? The Tonex had a fuller bottom and the rest were brittle and missing low end. Maybe it was the YT conversion of mpeg to mpeg? I can only assume this will be corrected with eq.

[@tisbonus]

OMG I got the amp wrong. In both instances I picked 3 to be the amp. I thought 5 was Tonex. They were my favorites. Wrong on both counts. Time to get Tonex and be quiet. WOW!!

[@dewil7313]

@@tisbonus Nice to see some honesty =D I have tonex on my PC, amazing.

[@tisbonus]

@@dewil7313 They named it correctly, that tone!

[@Rich-TheCosmicSurferBand]

Man my tv audio out is plugged to my orange crush 12L litlle amp. Music and specially recorded guitar sounds great on it. It was clear that n2 was the tube amp. I'm not really into amp modelers but this was a fun one!