got a green dot version for $127.91 shipped, no brainer. Lifetime warranty is nice.
@jayweth4 ай бұрын
Smart!!
@DesertTactical Жыл бұрын
I noticed this optic is becoming quite popular. I might have to pick one up and check it out for myself. Good video!
@jayweth Жыл бұрын
For sure. I have a video coming out tomorrow for more review. But let them know I sent you.
@DesertTactical Жыл бұрын
@@jayweth standing by for the video!
@baxrok2.4 ай бұрын
Just bought one for $180. lol We'll see how it holds up. Thanks!
@jayweth4 ай бұрын
Awesome price.
@charlesbeall25894 ай бұрын
One of these days these guys will forget to blast us with noise at the beginning of every video.....hopefully.
@jayweth4 ай бұрын
Or not. lol. I kid. My newer videos have adjusted audio and I've cut down on the music to get to the meat of the content. Thanks for watching. And thanks for the feedback
@joshuabustamante704111 ай бұрын
Daylight bright? Looks legit
@jayweth11 ай бұрын
It’s pretty legit.
@Warhammer7710 ай бұрын
whats foot print i want to put one on my x5 legion..
@jayweth10 ай бұрын
Rmr.
@thecadillacoftokyo8788 Жыл бұрын
Does it come with the MOA ring dot?
@jayweth Жыл бұрын
The green does not. But there is an option with red.
@thecadillacoftokyo8788 Жыл бұрын
@@jayweth how do you know which one is which. On the sight they only sell red or green but on optics planet they sell 4 different versions
@jayweth Жыл бұрын
@@thecadillacoftokyo8788 on the site they have a red one with the ring. Best thing is to contact them to help with your purchase. Tell them I sent you. 🤙🏻
@GideonOptics2023 Жыл бұрын
@@thecadillacoftokyo8788 Argh, ignore the "1 MOA" listings on Optics Planet. We are trying to get them taken down. Either the red or green emitter is just 3 MOA right now. In the future we are hoping to do additional variants but right now you can choose between 3 MOA dots in red or green. We did a very small initial run of circle dot Omegas so there are a few of those out in the wild, but decided to put the circle dot reticles in our Alpha and Rock models instead. ---Mike