GLADIATOR 2 | A Completely Unnecessary Sequel

[@ROBERTGOSHEY]

I asked for frikkin' sharks with laser beams on their head in the flooded Colesseum. Come on, work with me people!

[@BrandonScott-mi5pz]

GREAT 👌 THORIAS UNLIMITED GLADIATOR TWO 2⃣ REVIEW 👌 Necessary. SEQUEL NO

[@zebare726]

They are saving it for the third movie or the fourth.

[@AndriyValdensius-wi8gw]

Nah. The next one will be Gladiator 3 : The Return of Jurassic Park. Minimus the gladiator will fight a T Rex in the Colisseum. And half way, T Rex will break off to give the audience a quick rendition of "I Like to Boogie." (I'm sorry. I do apologise. I couldn't help it.)

[@felixcolon599]

​@@AndriyValdensius-wi8gwhe likes the nightlife

[@als3022]

Just from a historians perspective, the naval engagements were a thing, minus the sharks. They were never really popular though. And only lasted a decade or so. Throwing an expensive gladiator at an animal though, insanity. And still no gladiator product placements.

[@SinEater_]

Well, if you think about it, it wouldn't be as entertaining as watching people move around an open area. Not really enough room for the mock naval battles.

[@trueblaze84]

Human vs animal fights were generally reserved for criminals being punished as the animals were expected to win most of the time. There were a number of exceptions but they weren't that common

[@Rschaltegger]

"Were you there?"

[@SinEater_]

@@Rschaltegger No. And that's why it irritates me when people say they know that something happened. I mean, you can't even trust video nowadays.

[@uuddlrlrbas9904]

True, where are my billboards and jumpsuits with sponsors

[@okcomics1635]

It's a completely different movie, mind you. This one has TWO crazy emperors, see?

[@SinEater_]

And Denzel... DENZEL!😆

[@ScooterBond1970]

...and sharks.

[@imyoursuperbeast8220]

Ah wha?! 2 you say?

[@bentonrp]

hey, the 2nd one disappointed, but the 3rd one will return to being epic! They jump forward 1800 years to North America, and the Gladiators are competing in a show called American Gladiators in the 90's, right? It's all about how another great Empire fell when it's at its height due to the excess and sloth of the rise of social media. A CGI young Bill Gates makes an appearance in it, but don't worry; They tie it in real well to the 1st Gladiator in a weird sort of way. ...Apparently Juba and that Germanic Gladiator are suppose to have been the great ancestors of the guys who invented the Pentium Processor, or something like that. Just trust me: You're gonna love it!

[@bdleo300]

Gladiator III: Three Emperors (and some aliens)

[@Emanon...]

Sea battles were indeed "re-enacted" in the coliseum. That part is more historically act than most of the plot. Not the sharks though. At least afaik.

[@sister_bertrille911]

There was only one documented naumachia held in the Coliseum, and it is described as modest, given the dimensions of the structure. Most were held in natural bodies of water or in specially constructed basins. No sharks.

[@infectedumbrellagrunt3682]

Supposedly that happens in the Colosseum centuries before Gladiator since the architecture underwent a number of changes.

[@snsnplpl]

Saw the trailer. Man riding rhino? Sharks in the coliseum? Nope

[@BrandonScott-mi5pz]

EXCELLENT THORIAS UNLIMITED GLADIATOR TWO REVIEW WORK.

[@zebare726]

Female legionnaire😂

[@AndriyValdensius-wi8gw]

Riding a rhino ? That's nothing. In Gladiator 3 he'll be sitting on the back of a giant pterodactyl, that swoops into the arena. And catches the evil Emperor in its claws and carries him away. The End. Please.....please let it be the end. 😮😢

[@trueblaze84]

Actually the coliseum WAS infact water tight and they did on occasion re enact sea battles. Im not aware of any times they used sharks however crocodiles were fairly common

[@Norbert_Sattler]

Not to mention that Rome invented sewers, so it makes sense they'd know how to build something water-tight. Though I'd imagine that the hanging gardens beat them to making water-tight, big structures by quite a bit of time.

[@bomcabedal]

It was for some time, but only until the structure of tunnels and lifts below it was built, which made this impossible. There have been two (or possibly only one), with the last Naumachia (sea battle) taking place in AD 85. Even then it was sort of underwhelming since the Colosseum's arena wasn't huge (c. 80 x 50 metres) and didn't allow for large vessels. Sea battles were typically performed in the much larger Augustinian basin to the west of the city, on the other side of the Tiber river; the river's water could be used to flood the area. By the 3rd century no sea battles had been performed in the Colosseum for over a century.

[@josebrown5961]

But I thought that the colosseum had all sorts of things underneath it? Did ancient Romans have the ability to seal those things enough that they could do what the movie shows?

[@trueblaze84]

@@josebrown5961 those were installed later. As other people mentioned, the sea battles weren't very popular so they only happened a few times then they upgraded the arena with trap doors and what not to make for more entertaining shows

[@bomcabedal]

@@josebrown5961 It did, but those "things" were all situated right underneath the arena. There simply wasn't enough depth left after they'd been installed to create a basin. In addition, getting water inside the basin was a big problem, contrary to the Augustinian basin.

[@sardonically-inclined7645]

Was I excited to see the movie? No. Am I pleased to see this video? Yes. Difference? Entertainment value.

[@abelgonzalez158]

I can’t. Denzel being a modern sounding man in ancient garb throws me all the way out of the immersion and I simply cannot sit through that

[@sgtslaughter54]

Wait, Denzel isn't doing an accent or is doing a poor accent?

[@SinEater_]

@@sgtslaughter54 Denzel doesn't act. Denzel just plays Denzel in every movie...

[@sgtslaughter54]

@@SinEater_ Sounds about part for the course.

[@gardogodinez6621]

Mah Mehn

[@MegaHeelhook]

It should have been Idris Elba cast in this role.

[@OceanbornAngel]

I understand your historical ignorance Thorias. Not many people know that the Romans DID pipe in water to the Coliseum and have naval battles. However they did not use sharks, they would use Crocodiles in the water.

[@kingslayer2999]

Gladiator 2 is the most unnecessary Sequel of all time. It shouldn't have been made and I will Die on the Hill that Ridley Scott is a Hack these days

[@bentonrp]

Stay tuned for Gladiator 3: Gladiate or Die !

[@harryrabbit2870]

Ridley Scott is on a history kick...except he doesn't know or care about history. The history stuff is just to wrap his shop-worn concepts around.

[@bdleo300]

@@bentonrp Gladiator IV: Reloaded Gladiator V: The Empire strikes back Gladiator VI: Return of Maximus Gladiator vs Aliens Gladiator: Reboot Gladiator: Remake

[@bentonrp]

@@bdleo300 Lol! Sounds about right!

[@SiriuslyBlack7]

@1:01 you nailed it early..NO.Gladiator didn't need a sequel.

[@Darkside_C7]

You nailed it. The only thing I would add, is the amazing musical score from the original was almost completely missing in Gladiator 2. The score in the first movie was very significant.

[@TheHangarHobbit]

Anybody else really REALLY sick of endless reboots, remakes, and sequels? The original was a perfect complete film, no sequel hooks, just a really good 1 and done, and instead of leaving it be we have "Gladiator II: Gladiate With A Vengeance" 🤦‍♂

[@vaporwave4880]

Did you see the movie?

[@nicholasking4067]

The Roman Colosseum could sustain enough water to do mock navy battles. As for the sharks... I dunno dude. Could look it up. But I'm going to bed.

[@tomaszwota1465]

They farmed sharks, but I don't know if they had any in the actual Circus. Transporting them would be a pain the ass I can imagine.

[@olg05001]

They did

[@trueblaze84]

​@@tomaszwota1465 to be fair coliseum were big spare no expense events so if the emperor wanted sharks, you were getting sharks no matter the difficulty

[@thebatman4279]

Can't wait for Gladiator 3 which has 3 emperors (count 'em, THREE! 😮) and armoured dinosaurs in an colleseum filled with volcano lava and, get this, the story revolves around the son of Lucious who, due to a tragedy (loses his wife probably), has to become a gladiatorial slave but eventually rises up to defeat the emperors and then has a vision of a unified Rome!

[@als3022]

The way they are skipping through emperors that would be Christian Rome. Guess who the villains are.

[@ScreamingDoom]

Maybe Gladiator 3 will have Mecha-Nero and Robo-Caligula Voltron-assemble with Alien-Tiberius to form Ultra Mega Zord Emperor. Half crazy, half pervert, all Emperor.

[@DoodsUnited]

That sounds a whole lot better than what we'll actually get

[@elperrodelautumo7511]

At least gladiator 2 stars didn’t hate rant on their audience. Unlike that wicked actress

[@kirk1701]

1:44 “And I did appreciate they treated the original film with respect and reverence.” Then he goes into a review showing how the original film _wasn’t_ respected. Namely, by being made and making the same movie again.

[@anthonyplanzo1082]

They 100% filled it with water for naval battles but the sharks are a 100% nope.

[@HivisoftheScale]

The most consistent critique of this film seems to be "Are you not Entertained?! ...meh?"

[@ScreamingDoom]

3:37 - Yes, flooding the Colosseum to do mock naval battles was a thing, yes. I don't know of any time they transported live sharks for these things, but they did occasionally add in crocodiles imported from Egypt. It wasn't just the Colosseum, either. Other amphitheaters could do it, too, but the Colosseum was custom designed so that it could be flooded or drained in a matter of minutes (other flood-ready entertainment venues took hours of backbreaking labor to do the same). It's an impressive illustration of Roman engineering and mastery of hydraulics. That said, the ability was rarely used. It was expensive to maintain the waterways and machinery and the mock battles didn't tend to be very popular.

[@als3022]

Probably because you can't build a fan base for a bunch of nondescript men on a ship. Thaddeus the Thaddilonian defeated of 23 men in open combat. Oh he'll yeah. The ships, nah. The rich ladies won't be buying their sweat anytime soon. Thaddeus, his sweat is a best seller.

[@bdleo300]

Not really, only once and there were no sharks and bs.... But again this movie has Romans invading 'Numidia' in 210 AD... with trebuchets...

[@bloodrunsclear]

We have Gladiator at home…

[@darryledxavier6392]

The movie is shorter than the first one but feels so much longer

[@doug6500]

Paul Mescal is not Russell Crowe. Hopefully this is last we see of him. More like a sickly wet fish than someone imparting any gravitas. He'd be better in Love Actually or something.

[@bentonrp]

There were so many call-backs with no pay-offs that it's obvious Ridley Scott just wanted to relive his glory days of filming the first one 😆

[@maniravsadhur8409]

Naval battles in the Coliseum did exist...

[@whos-the-stiff]

A raging rhino defeated with pocket sand...genius.

[@Elmgren76]

I was half expecting the Monty Python ”Biggus D….s”-scene when I saw this film tonight. It was horrendeous!

[@RedRaikou]

Soulless cashgrab

[@lieutenantcoloneltanyavond8273]

3:33 They indeed had the technology. There were sea battle reenactments in Colosseum. No sharks tho/

[@doublep1980]

The Coliseum could be flooded and they did in fact had mock naval battles. That was in deed historically accurate. No sharks though, instead they had Crocodiles. They also had rhinos, but no they did NOT ride them like some Chaos Warriors of Khorne from Warhammer or something. The rest is also all BS, like the twin emperors. Geta & Caracalla were brothers but NOT twins and were supposed to rule together, as their father, Septimus Severus had decided. ( 2 emperors ruling together was a thing). Caracalla though had a different idea, he murdered his brother in front of their mother, then executed another 20,000 Romams who were suspected to be his brother's followers and took the throne. He was described as a brutal tyrant and a pretty masculine guy. ( the guy's hobby was hunting lions!) The movie turned him into a mentally challenged femboy. He was eventually assassinated, while being on a military campaign & taking a piss. I'm not joking! Also, Macrinus ( Denzel's character) was a real person and became briefly Emperor. He was no former slave though and also not black, but rather of Semitic ethnicity, Middle-Eastern/ Arab looking in other words. He managed to rise through the ranks of Rome and eventually took the throne. That would have made for a far better movie.

[@bdleo300]

Missed the most important bs: Romans invading 'Numidia' in 210 AD......... 300 years off.... and they didn't have trebuchets...

[@Willowy13]

Some universal truths: there are no sequels to Star Wars, Star Trek has no STD, Peter Capaldi is the last Doctor and there is only one Gladiator.

[@bdleo300]

and only one Matrix movie

[@DarkPhoenixSaga]

Gladiator is my favorite movie. I refuse to watch a sequel to a movie that never needed one. To me, it's like a Joker 2.

[@Kingkev0]

Gladiator is an amazing film; you're really missing out if you haven't seen it.

[@art23428]

Did we ask no

[@KingDanny9]

Gladiator 2 is an amazing experience!!! I've seen it twice so far, best movie of the year.

[@samuraigundam0079]

I wanted Djimon Honshu to make an appearance, if not be a major character in the movie.

[@herooflight7931]

The first gladiator stands alone. Russell crowe kills it in every role he plays

[@reymondlopez7468]

Flooding the coliseum is in fact true. Sharks …. No.

[@killerfrank8974]

Gladiator is one of those films where unless you can do what Top Gun:Maverick was able to do (i.e. make a sequel to a film that didn't need one but make that sequel more amazing and brilliant than it has any right to be) you shouldn't even bother doing a part II.

[@NickJaime]

Rome did have water battles but the cost and water damage to the coliseum was too much. The sharks, though, are another one of the riddle's bad ideas, like letting Phonix be Napoleon.

[@uuddlrlrbas9904]

Fun fact the sea battles were true events, and rome would hunt and farm sharks but they wouldn't be able to transport the sharks so they used things like crocs and hippos instead.

[@OmegaPaladin]

Those ancient Romans were clever folks. That’s why their empire was so big and lasted so long. That’s why we’re still using their bridges and roads. They absolutely filled that coliseum with water to stage naval battles. They used fresh water instead of sea water, though, and didn’t use man-eating sharks. Using seawater and capturing and transporting sharks is too much trouble. However, they did drive a lot of land animals to extinction by killing them in their coliseums.

[@markusking7594]

Well said!

[@ak96ful1]

So were you not entertained Thorias?

[@Jodie-G198]

One of the most unnecessary sequels of the last... five years. Gladiator (2000) was great, as-is. Here mostly to give this review a bump-up in the algorithm.

[@thefanwithoutaface8105]

3:40 there's no evidence of sharks but the Romans actually could flood the stadium for sea battles

[@AdrianFahrenheitTepes]

There historically were mock naval battles involving ships and filling up water in the arena, although that was limited given the size of the arena. It was primarily ship vs ship battles, not sharks in the water. Animals were generally reserved in the arena for criminals since if a criminal couldn’t even win a fight with an animal, then the person was a disgrace. The mock mini naval battles only happened for a brief time.

[@1multiverse]

Great review! Thanks

[@DADPOOL4044]

The colosseum was designed for just that. The arena floor could be removed exposing trenches that would be filled with ocean water. Quite a marvel for the time.

[@Insideoutcest]

yeah colosseum had plumbing for this water battle idea but i dont think the salinity would be good for the sharks

[@willbohland3698]

I'm with ya. F this movie. Denzel is cool, but F this movie.

[@davidnicholls5303]

Ridley's got a point when he tells history critics 'were you there?'-HE WAS. Yes, he really is THAT old

[@RobouteGuilliman-M41]

Yeah, I've lost all respect for Denzel Washington, after he started whining about his gay kiss was edited out.

[@Justmyhandle]

Not since The Fonz introduced the name for this trope in 1977 have I seen a story so spectacularly jump the shark... with actual SHARKS! Now, if we could just do something about those frickin' attachable laser beams...

[@GaudiaCertaminisGaming]

I’m so sick of sequels and spin-offs I now don’t watch them on principle. Why encourage them?

[@2tone209]

AY UP THORIAS

[@grantpflum6844]

Hell, the main plot of Lucius wanting revenge for his wife's death doesn't even make sense and it's the thing the whole movie hinges on. With Maximas the audience was able to understand and sympathize with his motivations because he joined the legions to provide a better life for his wife and son, was offered the entire empire on a platter but turned it down to be with them, then had Commodus torture and murder the both of them out of petty jealousy and spite despite them both being helpless and harmless. In Lucius case he SUPPORTED his wife's decision to become a soldier in a war, helped her get to the front lines, armed and armored her, and she wasn't singled out or harmed out of malice. She was just another casualty of war.

[@johnmcclane5322]

Thanks for the job

[@Alatoic01]

The naval battles in the Coliseum was real, just it was water from the river, not salt water, so no, no Sharks, they used crocodiles and hippos and did not combined with naval battles.

[@DarkPhoenixSaga]

Also, it was only about five feet deep, so there was no way sharks could swim there.

[@Kratos-xp2qi]

Literally found out this movie existed a few days ago. Seems like I didn't miss much.

[@williamedwards4151]

It's like they put a punch of old movie names in a hat. Ya know? Just grab one, see what pops up.

[@antartis73]

Dude you should have looked up in history books about the Colosseum being flooded and the naval battles some of the emperors hosted, yes the sharks were not needed and clearly fictional although crocs from Egypt would be brought in. Also you should have read a little into the relationship of Caracalla and Geta, joint emperors that absolutely couldn’t stand each other and in fact occupied different sides of the palace in Rome with punishment of death for those that crossed over the boundary. You’re Right about Lucius and his portrayal though he just didn’t feel right and also his wife’s death almost felt inconsequential to him. Denzel’s character Macrinus’s was miscast imho because again if you read about him he was of ‘Berber’ background, Denzel’s New York accent, mannerisms and general acting left me feeling he was filming a sequel to ‘The Equaliser’ next door with Pedro Pascal.

[@bdleo300]

How about Romans invading Numidia in 210 AD hahaha... with trebuchets....

[@mrne1988]

I'll consider this a victory. Hollywood made an okay movie-not terrible, not great, just okay. There are so few new movies worth watching nowadays that even this feels like a victory. Sad, isn't it?

[@balrighty3523]

Okay, so they put sharks in the Colosseum. But did anyone jump those sharks?

[@leonardkrol2600]

The history of sequels is that most of them fail.

[@tomasistudios2618]

sea battles were a thing but it was short lived because it cost to much

[@michaelc1626]

So as soon as I saw the first trailer, I thought...this looks exactly like the first one. And the whole staging mock naval battles in the Collesium is actually historically accurate. Don't ask me how they did it though

[@olg05001]

You should do research in those days they did filled the arena with water

[@billbillinger2117]

When ChatGPT rewrites a movie:

[@mechgouki7999]

Glacked

[@scotthirschausen177]

Gladiator 2... this time its personal

[@leandrodevilsummoner]

The movie didn't seem interesting anymore, but the part about the Sharks in the Coliseum...I thought that could be the plot for a new Sharknado movie. Great review!!

[@DannyKnightblade45]

At this point in time, I wouldn't be surprised if hollyweird made a sequel to Forrest Gump.

[@ctrain6962]

Good take

[@patrickmcgavin2245]

I haven't seen the movie, so I can't criticize from personal experience. From other KZbinrs I trust like you, all the consensus is gladiator 2, is boring and a lot of things don't make sense. I'm surprised, they didn't have the woman be an unstoppable B.A. it's usually unearned, that's what I don't like about it. Through the history of cinema the B.A women characters have earned it. With it our love and respect. That was until 2013, in some things and 2016, then became egregious since 2018.

[@TevyaSmolka]

Gladiator 2 really felt unnecessary in my opinion

[@Bonn3000]

Boat battles really happened with out sharks .

[@zebare726]

Considering how today's Hollywood handles their ips, I'm pretty sure that sooner or later they will do something with Titanic, either in the form of a "modern" remake or in the form of a prequel, heck they might even do a sequel.

[@dannyd.9932]

Clearly they should have made it a musical

[@sgt_slobber.7628]

I think it would’ve been better as a Stand alone film!!!!

[@m.michaels]

Yes. They could fill certain arenas with water and they did have boat fights. The ships. Were much smaller. No, they didn't put sharks in. Crocs? Seals? Maybe a small whale just to hunt and chop up for people to see..... MAYBE But not sharks.

[@frmm123]

They should've had Daisy Ridley in there fighting, riding a shark! Hail Thorias!

[@setlik3gaming80]

Hail Thorias 🖖

[@Clambamthankyoumam]

They lost my interest for the sequel the very second that they announced it. I never once felt that there had to be a Gladiator II but rather they should’ve left the previous film as a one off since it managed to tie all the loose ends perfectly with the story and characters as far as I’m concerned. Honestly I’m not gonna acknowledge this or the third movie whatsoever.

[@victormendes1588]

It's sad in a way when movie reviews are better the film.

[@jaceseldom8236]

They actually did that, the fact you didn't know that is embarrassing.

[@jagsdomain203]

The sharks probably not but they did do they did do some naval battles in there I think they only did one or two but it did happen

[@gadrielvanorion9872]

gladiator 2 will simply be forgotten sooner rather then later it was just that forgettable

[@KingDanny9]

Liar!!! I've seen it twice now and I'll be buying the DVD.

[@KingDanny9]

Gladiator 2 is past 400 million in just two weeks. People love it, my date tonight loved it.

[@gadrielvanorion9872]

@KingDanny9 doesn't change the fact it will be forgotten fairly fast, and whenever ppl remember the gladiator they remember the first The second most likely will only be mentioned like this : i think it had a sequel And that's that

[@KingDanny9]

@@gadrielvanorion9872 Total lie, the movie is making a fortune now

[@gadrielvanorion9872]

@@KingDanny9 you are mentally disabled, i see i just ignore you from here on

[@Starkiller2725]

The Romans really were that good though.

[@karenhall4645]

If you wait over 10 years to make a sequel to a movie, then obviously that movie didn't need a sequel. I don't seem to recall audiences asking for a Gladiator II either so why was this movie made. Hollywood is no longer capable of making one off movies anymore - everything must be a franchise.

[@odojang]

Naval battles in the Coliseum; yes they were a thing. Sharks; no that's fantasy. Sharks, especially great whites, don't survive out of free sea water. hence why there are none even in modern aquariums. Animals in the Coliseum; yes they were a thing but but no, not as figthing but as hunting spectacles or to kill hepless, defenseless, unarmed prisoners. Because animals were expensive and gladiators too. Commodus was reknowned for killing beasts in the arena, including some weird choices like girafes. Yes not a bad film but indeed quite needless. It will fade into obscurity like King Kong Lives, the sequel to the 1976 Kong remake.

[@Hewylewis]

I think you'll find Wicked Part 1 a lot more enjoyable than Gladiator II.

[@kingslayer2999]

Yeah if he's a woman he would

[@Hewylewis]

@@kingslayer2999 Well, that was misogynistic to say.

[@reno2319]

I can't wait for your review of arcane season 2

[@Denneska]

I will NEVER bother watching this movie 😤

[@jaycollins2036]

Lucius's town is attacked and his wife dies, he's sold into slavery to become a gladiator(just like his dad. Already dumb) The man who attacked his village happens to be his Mom's husband(smh). The first man he befriends in captivity is a black man which I feel is supposed to mirror the original. Still, they kill this guy immediately before he has any discernable characteristics. The man who buys Lucius, son of Maximus, heir to the empire also just so happens to be a man who is scheming to overthrow it. Why is the empire not a republic? This is just the Force Awakens. I literally walked out of this movie to my complaints end there. The shark scene was a bridge too far. SO many reviews seem like they want to go soft on this trash movie.

[@missugh1890]

We didn’t not know that was max son 😮😮😮😂😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣

[@BrianFlyingPenguin]

3:28 Hah! Yeah, that... That actually happened.

[@AdrianFahrenheitTepes]

Small ship on ship battles though. Not really sharks. There were only a few mock naval battles held in the Colosseum for how expensive they were to get all the water in there. Most of the Naval Re-enactments did not happen in the Colosseum, but rather in the Lakes or Rivers. There were several recorded Naval Battles in the Colosseum over years from AD 80 to AD 107, when the last one happened in the Colosseum. If you were in Rome you would basically most likely only see one mock naval battle in the colosseum in your lifetime. You would more likely see such a battle in the Tiber River or in the Mediterranean Sea. Did they do it? Yes. But it was difficult and expensive to do and had to be planned very well to pull it off. Most naumachiae or mock Naval Battles were actually in the lakes or rivers since the water was already there and didn’t have to be relocated over longer periods of time.

[@filipvadas7602]

I genuinely don't get why this movie exists or who asked for it. I could understand the motive being "I like money" if it was made a few years after the original. But making a sequel to a movie that wrapped things up with the neatest of bows, *24 years* after the fact is just insane. Its the definition of striking while the iron is *ice cold* The only logical explanation is money laundering lol

[@TheEverSoTalented]

I wonder if when they flooded the arena did the tigers underground get drowned?

[@JustTooDamnHonest]

Gladiator was created by an artist/storyteller and Gladiator II was made by an out of touch failure.

[@scifiguy26]

Did Ridley Scott put any black Goo in this movie he's obsessed with it

[@thiefthearcher9907]

Can’t wait for a sequel of the 1960’s Spartacus. 🤦🏾‍♂️

[@SupremeCommanderBaiser]

The Spartacus series was awesome!

[@thiefthearcher9907]

@ The one on Stars is amazing.

[@bdleo300]

Titanic 2

[@guywholikesanimations1018]

You know what wouldn’t be a unnecessary sequel? Transformers one Go out there and show your support to transformers one