Glashutte Original SeaQ Review - Quality and Details

Thank you to Nick at Exquisite Timepieces for making this review happen. It was a pleasure! For those interested please reach out here for quotes and additional information-
Nick's cell- 443-655-4800
[e-mail]
I'm posting every couple days in my exclusive Patreon group. Come check it out for a month, its a lot of fun-
/ brucewilliams

[@abdurrazzakbinarahman8677]

I think its really disrespectful to a company like Glashutte when someone says that it shouldn't cost as much as a submariner when its, in my opinion, a better product than the submariner.

[@markbowman5580]

Great watch but they don’t hold there value like a Rolex

[@jackserious3282]

The people that buy this watch are not concerned with the value or flipping a watch.

[@yankeesandgiants1886]

I just bought this watch last week. You can get one on a synthetic strap for under $7K from an AD. Dial, finish, fit- just superb. It's a tool watch from a great German manufacturer. This is probably not a watch for a Rolex/Omega buyer. This is to compete against a Blancpain Fifty Fathoms-and others in that class/orbit. It's for you the watch buyer to appreciate the workmanship and the story behind the brand and the watch that inspired the SeaQ -(1969 East German made Spezimatic). I realize the numbers are large and it's not for everyone but I really enjoy it. Rolex will sell 500 Submariners for every one of these sold. That's okay. Rolex is a great watch and it gets you noticed and has great resale value. GO is not competing against Rolex- it can't win. I don't dislike the Rolex brand family- I own a Tudor North Flag and I love that watch as well. I also love the new Bond Omega Seamaster No TIme to Die Edition at $10K- that watch is beautiful. In person, the new blue dial version is stunning with applied white numerals (for those who need applied numerals to somewhat justify this price point). I went with the vintage look of the black dial but if you want a watch that people will notice- the blue dial is the one for you. Also the larger panoroma date is awesome but it's just to large for me (especially the thickness). It sits too high on the wrist and is not comfortable. So many great watches- so hard to choose.

[@michaelfierman3256]

It's interesting to get to the point in a hobby where you can look at a watch and know it's not for you, and I don't mean just because of the price, but to still be able to appreciate it on it's own terms.

[@josevasquez1781]

Got mine in July 2020 after seeing it in late 2019. Took a minute to drop heavy coin but worth it. It’s stunning on so many levels, a great reissue. Even the movement is based on the original caliber 39 from 1969 but GO modernized it to 39-11 so yeah very faithful in and out. This GO and my new GS SLGH003 coming December with that 9SA5 movement! And I’m straight up done. I hope.

[@zacherycampbell7296]

I’ve been looking forward to this one!! You don’t see many reviews of this brand, and that dial is KILLER

[@impexRQ]

I saw the new Blue dial SeaQ- gorgeous piece 😍

[@BuckFush08]

I purchased the SeaQ Panorama Date, and it's simply stunning! Love the oversized date window between the 4 and 5 o'clock position. The winding mechanism in unparalleled, the finish is stunning... I own about 10 watches, including Omega's and other high priced pieces... this is my favorite!

[@racebannon3014]

Purchased this watch a couple wks ago and it’s stunning. A terrific compliment to my Rolex collection

[@samuelball8775]

Love this watch Bruce - it looks amazing. I actually prefer it to the sub... gasp in horror people haha. Sounds like you’ve got a cold - hope you’re feeling better soon 👍

[@ref6122]

Nice watch. The Arabic numerals are a tad to big for my liking.

[@bobj8877]

Bruce, I see they've updated the bracelet in 2023. It's now fully brushed! If they'd just add the open caseback i think I'd for sure upgrade my BB58 to this. I also own a white SMP, and feel like this would be an amazing compliment to that in terms of my divers. I do really like the contrast right now of the SMP vs the BB58 for that reason - modern vs vintage.

[@scottlalonde2878]

Great video, Bruce, thank you. The watch is really nice.

[@peterstone9705]

Great looking watch, another one for this list !👍🇬🇧

[@964tractorboy]

Now that's a great watch. Initially I didn't like the over-sized numerals but after a few minutes I'd got my head around them. The bracelet finish and design is also outstanding. What a pity I wear a rubber strap! More of Glashu(umlaut)tte please!

[@twelvecrows3596]

Bruce, I am not surprised that so many here dislike this timepiece. I love the use of Arabics and particularly the "6". Love or hate I guess...I am trying to decide between this and the Panoramic Date version and am struggling with the decision. Will you be putting up a review/comparison of the two? If not, what are your thoughts on the Panoramic?

[@TheBigWrist]

I like the water lapping intro. Nice job Bruce.

[@John..18]

Lack of crown guards always puts me off,,,, I've broken crowns on cheap watches, (admittedly at work),, but if I was to bang this (big) expensive crown, I'd be crying into my beer for hours,,,, lol,,,

[@austinzizzi1142]

I really might be getting this. I was going to buy a bb58 but I’m trying to decide if I should reach for one of these second hand

[@impexRQ]

I love the Glashütte SeaQ Panorama Datum- it’s amazing piece

[@ZU628]

Hey Bruce, great video as usual, really big fan of your down to earth demeanour which adds sincerity to your words. There's a Glashütte Original Seventies Panorama Date in the thumbnail of your travel watches video. Does that mean we can expect a review on it soon? It's my grail and I would love to hear your take on it. Thanks!

[@Tonysoprano497]

I’ve got to say if I was in the market for a high end diver this would be it . The quality is phenomenal. It’s a watch you buy for ultimate long term satisfaction without thinking how much will I bank if I sell .

[@BruceWilliams]

Truth! More watch 'fans' need to rediscover that

[@twstrchasr]

That case really reminds me of the Seiko SPB143J1.

[@projektflytkonsult729]

And the Seiko is top notch

[@dougdaileyphotography1534]

Don't get me wrong, this is an awesome watch, and probable worth close to the asking price, with an AD discount. I think 10K is too much. I think too many watch brands are upping the prices of their watches because of Rolex. They figure, if Rolex can charge 10k plus, we can also. Breightling did this with their higher end models, and they didn't sell very well. For 10K, I would get the JAEGER-LECOULTRE POLARIS CHRONOGRAPH, or a sports Rolex model. The watch also looks like the Seiko 62 mas, only with a different dial. The numbers, and indices are also painted on, not sure that's a good feature for a watch costing 10K.

[@BruceWilliams]

I think luxury brands like GO aren't focusing about buyers who can only afford one 10k retail watch. They are marketing themselves to those who can buy multiple as well as the next tier up with ease.

[@Sebastian85]

I totally agree with you. I never see this watch in that price range. It would always feel like too much paid for. Okay, the movement is decorated, but you can't see it. Compared to Tudors Black Bays and Pelagos or so many great watches for 10k, I don't see the SeaQ as a rival. And the used market for this watch speaks for itself. It seems like there is a low demand. You can get them unworn for around 6000 Euro.

[@panaristiman1243]

Doug Dailey Photography Hi Doug 100% Agreed is a high $$$ dollar watch, raising the prices to compete with Rolex I don’t thing is the answer, I love JLC I personally owned a Master Compressor Extreme World Alarm 🚨 love your pick Doug Polaris Chronograph beautiful Time Piece be safe and well......Regards Bruce

[@dougdaileyphotography1534]

@@panaristiman1243 You too, Bruce.

[@willied1736]

Recommended price is 9.5k, but reality is more around 7k. While the 43mm is significantly higher, it carries a 21ct gold rotor weight and complication. Agreed on the painted indices, and those indices could be a tad smaller too.

[@ccw5886]

This watch , this marque is so far ahead of Rolex in its status and manufacture process. There is no comparison. Rolex is a mass produced beautiful watch but the Glashutte is in a whole other class. It has the panache of being a marque you wont often see. there is a reason for this, its special

[@juliecable3351]

could you review the Jaegar LC Master Control Sector dial limited edition. I want one for my partner. perfect dress watch but I can't find much information on it. love your content.

[@shawnlavigne9069]

Beautiful. Pass on the Rolex and get this. German engineering is all about details and performance. They've engineered the case back to always align perfectly.

[@fire_watch7735]

Hey Bruce great review as always. The pictures of this watch do next to nothing for me. Hopefully this is one of those watches that better in real life... especially for the price. Cheers

[@jh-il5sb]

i too like this watch and the history of the brand, but struggle with the price. that hulk would win everytime!! something about the polished center links that contradicts the theme and function of the watch.

[@TommyRibs]

Love these. Part of the Swatch Group I believe.

[@SuperScottie3000]

I just looked, you’re right.

[@willied1736]

Perfect size, perfect clasp, perfectly aligning caseback, exceptional quality at par if not above Rolex, livable price, now please tell me why those indices cannot be applied and smaller? Or simply squared.

[@uwe7445]

Hi Bruce, I like the way you make your videos and one can feel your passion for watches... please go ahead. The Glashütte watch in your video is really amazing and I totally agree that a display caseback would be a nice feature. If I had the choice between the sub and the Glashütte what would I do? Well, I guess I would prefer the Glashütte over the sub, because only watch guys would identify it at first glance. And I think this does not have to be a disadvantage. Best regards from the middle of Germany Uwe

[@jacc88888]

Looks like amazing quality. I’m surprised that people in the comments think it should cost a lot less when clearly, with the decorated movement (which sadly can’t be seen) and the level of finishing of the bracelet and casework , more man-hours have probably gone into this watch than the sub. Not a fan of the larger dial numerals but can’t fault it for much else. Great review.

[@BruceWilliams]

Everyone is at a different point in their collecting journey. I hope that many who criticize the brand and model get to experience it one-day. It is eye opening :)

[@jacc88888]

Bruce Williams Yes, I feel people haven’t opened their mind yet to this watch and brand. Fair enough if you don’t like the design or if resale value and brand kudos are really important to you, but to ‘diss’ the watch because it has printed and not applied indices and overlook the positives seems a little narrow-minded to me. Just my 2 cents worth, I’ll be quiet now! 🤐

[@derekrolle6705]

Love everything GO!

[@olemanolete1]

Bruce, nice video, but this watch does nothing to me, I am so stuck with the omega semaster 300 ;( , your videos are so great.

[@sadaka201]

Great job, Bruce. Great watch. I take the Glashütte any time over the Submariner IMO. Remember, Glashütte has much much lower production as Rolex. In fact, Roles with more than one Mio. watches produces in a year is in the end nothing more than a mass market product. Sorry to say so... If I wear a watch, I want to be different. What about you and you and you?

[@BruceWilliams]

A great point. This is a true artisan product produced in very low numbers. It really shows in person

[@watching_nyc]

thanks for the review, Bruce! This is pretty close to perfection imo. A lug to lug measurement would have been nice. take care

[@samuelball8775]

I think that was at the start in text mate

[@watching_nyc]

Samuel Ball thanks! it’s tough to pay full attention with a two year old climbing on me at all times 😂✌️

[@matthewdavis8199]

47mm

[@zhan9207]

I want this watch to have the display case back and brushed bracelet

[@emmanueltsI5]

Thanks for the review Bruce! Really good video. Great watch, however just too pricey. Wearing the SPB145 (Seiko boutique blackbrownish dial) and as far the looks goes, this SPB does the job. Surely the quality between both models is night and day nevertheless the SPB145 is excellent for what it is :) Enjoy!

[@manuel_winde]

It’s a beautiful watch but one of the areas Rolex wins that doesn’t get acknowledged so much is that they look great when beat up. Even modern Rolex looks cool with scratches and general wear and tear. I’m not so sure the GO, which is clearly a more refined watch, has that daily wearer vibe though. What would it look like after 5years daily wear?

[@uesugikaru]

I gravitating towards the sbdc051now after i saw this video. The sbdc051 exudes a sea q vibe.

[@vishaldev13]

Great review Bruce. I bet 99.9% of the people with a $10k budget for a watch will gravitate to a Sub. Myself included.

[@jonathanlau6964]

Vishal, your comment was the first one that came up on the comments feed and when I read "99.9%" I thought you were exaggerating... and after scrolling down, you are not far off. I must admit that I am completely shocked that the watch community universally would take the Rolex over the GO. When I look at the SeaQ it looks like a near perfect blend of a vintage Fifty Fathoms (with the rounded bezel, crystal and dial numbering) and believe it or not... vintage submariners with the perfect sized case and the angles and proportions of the lugs. When I look at the new Rolex's it all seems a bit too industrial... to0 many lines and edges. The case and lugs are too angular. The crystal is not domed. It just seems to lack care and a personal touch. I am sure I will remain as one of the 0.01% that like this watch more than the Rolex and look forward to some watch geek hate! Keep up the amazing work Bruce (I do agree with your centre link comment... and obviously... all watches are better when you can see the movement... even if it is... gasp... a quartz!)

[@samuelball8775]

Jonathan Lau I love the look and finish of the Glashutte 👌

[@vishaldev13]

@@jonathanlau6964 Complete agree. Perception precedes reality and when Rolex creates an "artificial scarcity" and an elitist pay to play club, it greatly (grossly) exaggerates the value of the brand.

[@riojimatsuoka]

See it in real and you won't be interested in a sub anymore. It even tops the Blancpain. Pictures and videos do not do justice to this brand.

[@dechalertsumitkul8066]

How is it compare o Blanpain fifty fathams. I would prefer the brushed bracelet.

[@waterfordrs22]

For a true tool watch, having a solid, engraved back rather than simply molded, that’s completely appropriate. While it is nice to see a beautiful movement, for me at least, that novelty wears off very quickly. These are beautiful, i personally find them more interesting than a Sub by a large margin, but that price…. This is one I keep a casual eye out for on the pre owned market. They certainly make fine watches. One last thought, while I’m not remotely one to worry about power reserve and a watch like this is designed to be a daily wear, relative to the asking price, the movement is behind the times. I don’t generally sweat the specs favoring overall attention to detail, but there’s a lot of cheddar on the table when you buy one.

[@MLim-jh5xd]

Does anyone know if there is any taper on the bracelet?

[@SlapShotRegatta22]

Really struggling between the SeqQ vs a 16610 Sounds crazy but the Rolex is sooooo, so ubiquitous. The only thing holding me back from the Glashutte is the price.

[@mbalmazi6985]

have to chuckle at the notion of this and the sub being at the same pricepoint.

[@panaristiman1243]

Hello everyone !! Hi you doing Bruce great show, i have a lot respect for Glashutte love this SeaQ i really like the details on this watch very vintage, i thing a better match will be the Omega Seamater 300 41mm Master Chronometer Ref 233.30.41.21.01.001 an incredible time piece for a lot less $$ No this respect to Glashutte but marketing the SeaQ at that price $$ is going to be very hard to compete with the Rolex Submariner, personally i will prefer the Sub Regards Bruce Boca Raton FL

[@BruceWilliams]

Thanks. I'm a fan of the Seamaster 300 as well. Great watch for it's price

[@paolosoddu9642]

oh my god this is my grail sport watch!

[@zaskarclf]

Love this one. However my wallet disagrees with me. But I still LOVE IT! 😁

[@AyBi_Studio]

The more natural comparison would be to a Tudor Black bay in term of looks. Very reminicing of the BB

[@bobbysmith3433]

prefer the sub

[@mrpomm5900]

What is the accuracy guarantee?

[@Portland_Living_Life]

I was seriously considering this watch a few months ago. Like many others here I struggle with the price. It just doesn't seem like a good value to me, even with a discount.

[@twelvecrows3596]

What kind of discount were you offered?

[@sailinbob11]

The fact that they're setting a price,then telling you there's room to negotiate, tells me its overpriced to start with. All your doing is haggling over the salesman's commission.

[@taonguyen5174]

I just bought the blue 39.5mm SeaQ for 25% off. Got 3 quotes at 15/20/25%, all authorized dealers.

[@SGM805]

I think it’s a bargain at 10k stunning , probably get one for Christmas 🎄

[@BruceWilliams]

Congrats!!

[@tomkhong9828]

The Hulk looks like a big frog beside the handsome SEAQ.

[@SJCB27]

That date window REALLY spoils the aesthetics of this otherwise excellent looking watch. And those Rolex "dust traps" on the bezel are a bit naff, too! Your videos are getting better, Bruce. Well done, Mate!

[@WatchDisplay]

Great review! I loved this one in person but I agree the endlink should have polished centers.

[@petershallis2294]

Do I want one? YES! Would I actually prefer a Blancpain 50 Fathoms? .........er, yes.

[@mannycalavera2335]

It may be a weird thing to complain about, but I don't like the "Excell sheet - font" on the bezel.

[@tippykaffu4047]

I heard they are going to release new colors of this 39mm SeaQ

[@BruceWilliams]

That would be great!

[@stevefox8605]

Prefer this to the "common" Rolex, but for me I prefer the sm300m, properly done retro IMHO. Cheers 👍🏻

[@manuel_winde]

I like that this is slimmer- omegas too chunky/thick for me

[@houlester]

Would you say this watch is more comfortable than your submariner?

[@LuisFranciscoAguilar]

Stuunning piece! Looks like a great two piece collection with the Hulk! In the other hand...9:18 Here the Omega in comparison to the other two looks like a toy, a big thing with hands almost disappearing and that ugly cupcake sticked to it's case.

[@disheuresdis]

Great review. That SeaQ is very impressive, I don't like the polished center links on the bracelet though, as well as the brushed center link which creates inconsistency as you've commented, but it's not a deal breaker. Looking forward to your next post on Patreon!

[@BruceWilliams]

Thanks!

[@kentdavidson6416]

Agree . Polished center links scratch when you look at them.

[@twelvecrows3596]

How did the watch keep time? How accurate was it?

[@BruceWilliams]

Spot on

[@twelvecrows3596]

Bruce Williams Thanks. I’ve been torn between this and the 43mm version. I figured the 43mm/Caliber 36 would be accurate, but, honestly, I prefer the purer retro look of the 39.5. It’s also more understated.

[@JB-xt3ly]

I thought most of their movements were machine finished, maybe I heard wrong.

[@matthewdavis8199]

Machines guided by human hands vs largely robotic assembly lines like at Rolex and Omega, etc. Some of GO's movements do feature free hand engraving.

[@vast634]

A transparent case back on a dive watch? That would not be suitable, as its still meant to be a tool watch. (even though divers more likely pick a cheap Casio or Seiko)

[@benjaminklos9637]

If they made the blue dial in 39.5mm it’d be very tempting.

[@masqueman01]

My buddy just got offered a steel Rolex from an AD for $8k (not kidding)... you decide what the more prudent buy would be...

[@austinzizzi1142]

Entirely brushed bracelet please

[@hjadizulhusnihjyahya7288]

Great review as always Bruce! As for me well... not my cup of tea, I'll take Seiko Prospex SPB051 instead as case style similar to SeaQ, better dial design & more importantly it is way cheaper than SeaQ

[@BruceWilliams]

I'll be buying the new spb coming out soon. Looking forward to that

[@alessandrocerioli2151]

Very beautiful but at price you can get a FF.

[@comahrn]

I love the SeaQ with the panorama date. I hate white datewheels on black warches.

[@durpeladonis7064]

top Video Bruce (you are a real watch specialist👍❗) whats your opinion about the new Submariner-Killer Seiko spb143j1 ???

[@enriqueali]

It's obviously designed as a luxury product, and priced as such. I prefer the soon-to-released blue-dialled version. But the price! If it was offered at or around the $6K mark it might give me pause for thought. But the MSRP is just way out of my league.

[@neckbone6976]

One word... Blancpain‼️‼️

[@markq1312]

I just can't see this as a 10k watch ⌚

[@impexRQ]

If the submariner is ... than this one easy will be ...

[@JB-loves-watches]

both stunning watches only the price is imho a bit too high. see myself buying one at discount and wear it along my 214270

[@548vikings]

Perfect 2 piece combo meal.

[@martinharrison4245]

Reminds me of the 62mas, but nowhere near as nice looking. It does look beautifully made though.id take the sub everyday over that , for the same sort of money.

[@nk2ti]

I still like the sub better

[@2002chaiwa]

U can't compare GO to Rolex, GO is for a AP, VC, JC type of client. I don't think Rolex worth what they ask for it, but if they are overpriced why not bettter brands?

[@EscapePlan97]

I do not like arrow hands on watches. Other than that nice watch.

[@MichaelSmith-su9cq]

Can you put a strap on this? It’s hard to tell.

[@exodus9655]

Its a beautiful watch but I have to say it is over price. For that price I rather go for a better watch which can hold its value well. This piece can easily lose 30% of its value within a year. I love the watch n the look (but not the bracelet) of it but the price is just too unrealistic. These days I shifted from buying watches I fall in love at first sight to buying watches that can either hold its price well or depreciate just a little bit or it appreciate for me to make a profit out of it. After buying, selling n trading of watches (of more than 100 pieces) over the last 10 yrs as a hobby I have learnt my lesson well. Everytime I see a watch I like n tempted to buy, I asked myself whether am I really going to wear it or is it just some infatuation.

[@ShifterSr]

Argh. Polished center links.

[@jacc88888]

Jonathan Mills-Winkler I guess they are leaning towards the dressy-diver as opposed to the tool-diver. I personally love the look of the bracelet and the polished centre links but it’s all down to personal taste.

[@sailinbob11]

Looks like they took the pictures on my Omega box. I find that a little telling. I like the watch. It's nice,and clean. The bracelet is very close to my Omega 300m ,and no date,so ok ? Not a Rolex fan, I've got a few gripes with the Omega, but no deal breakers, yet,but it's new, so plenty of time to find more. I live on a sailboat, have for 12 years, i dive a lot, i paint mega yachts, so I see more Rolexs by the bushel, I like Rolex, who wouldn't? Other than the "Look at me" factor. Which,for me,was the reason i went 300m, no date, no escape valve. I use all my equipment without much thought about a few scratches, knocks or dings,as long as it functions properly, I'm good. I just don't understand the price. Ok,so 65 people will get one ? I'm guessing collectors ? Gonna leave it in a box for a few years, and get what ? Couple Gs ? So you can do what? Buy another watch? I have no qualms with collectors. That's what you're into, maybe this is has exciting potential, and you can leave it to the kids. Awesome.... My Opinion, save a few Gs,buy an Omega, or spend the 10,and buy the Rolex, or something. I'm also not a watch guru,so I could be totally wrong, and it's some kind of unicorn. My advice? Like it? Buy it. Thanks for the info.

[@chelious1973]

The comments below are sad. Do actual watch enthusiasts watch your channel? These watches are really not comparable. G.O. Is on another level. High horology. Rolex is not. Omega is not. G.O. Is. 10 grand is a bargain for this quality. Rolex is the better buy, resale though.

[@BruceWilliams]

I don't think I have a large about of experienced enthusiast viewers. I def has some, but not a large amount

[@martinchan2584]

62mas is a homage to Blancpain Bathyscaphe 1960...

[@BruceWilliams]

I can see a little resemblance

[@timmcdonald5335]

Lovely watch and review. From a divers perspective the Rolex Sub is the most legible. For diving the bezel is the key. If you go under water with the Rolex Sub its easy to see the 15 minute markers on the bezel. On this watch though, like some Seiko bezels, the 15 minute markers are not distinct. Also the large numbers on the dial distract from the bezel. Rolex wins as a dive watch.

[@Sisun_arumdaum]

If you think like that you should buy diving computer not diver watch

[@timmcdonald5335]

@@Sisun_arumdaum When I go diving I use both. Watch is a back up for safety.

[@marioerceg2161]

I just don't understand this brand's pricing policy and product placement, I mean they are not selling well, non-WIS people don't really know anything about this brand, and then instead of making a "big hit" watch, nice dial, interesting numerals, decent horology and finishing movement and then price it to make Omega/Tudor/... divers make look like cheap crap watches, they decide to compete with Rolex/Blancpain/Breguet etc. or even AP Diver (can be found in that ballpark)...I just don't get it. Impossible pill to swallow 😫, price?! non-display movement, no panorama date (I mean just why)...Sorry, to sum up, I love their designs, love the fact they are german quite proudly, this watch has so much potential, however the so-far execution is shameful.

[@wazreba5859]

Probably I'''[ll never be able to afford these watches ( frirend of mind just purchesed Rolex Submariner - I am happy for him ) however in this comparesment I would give more heart for Glashutte Original SeaQ. Rolex looks childish and silly. SeaQ is adult and serious. Personally I would buy Rolex, send to any wanker and would buy SeaQ + ORIS Aquis as daily watch.

[@evh4611]

Makes me think about a Seiko or a Oris diver. This watch is not for me.

[@waisinglee1509]

Personal preference? Okay, personally, I cannot stand the typeface on the dial. It looks ridiculous! It's like alphabet soup noodles.

[@pilotstyle123]

I cant accept multithousand dollar watches with print dials

[@BruceWilliams]

Can you accept sub 2k dollar watches with them?

[@pilotstyle123]

@@BruceWilliams I would draw the line probably at 1500

[@changi68]

They completely copied the Le Forban dive watch from the sixties ! 100% the same dial 2 4 6 8 10 12 and same hands, except the arrow which is not placed the same way.

[@nk2ti]

swear to God I would rather get a BB58

[@impexRQ]

No way …

[@Jonathan-dy7gq]

£10,000... come on, that's a joke. Waaay too expensive compared to what you can get for around £2000 plus. Cheers

[@sadaka201]

You have no clue about it....

[@Jonathan-dy7gq]

@@sadaka201 Well I've seen what Bruce had shown us... and you'd have to say one of many examples I could give would be the Omega Seamaster Diver 300 co-axial. At what? A third of the cost. I mean even the Submariner costs less.

[@user-dr7tb4xf4o]

I doubt you can find anything at this level for 2k. Similar looks maybe, but not similar level of finishing. Yeah it would be a tough sell at $10k, but I've seen these already selling for around $7.5k new and you could probably even get them for lower once used pieces start coming up, just because GO is not really a strong brand market wise. That being said, like what Bruce said, I think the level of finishing is a step above both Rolex and Omega, too bad they chose not to show off the movement, cause that's probably what would set it apart further. (BTW I own both Rolex and Omega)