14 million? Why Mr. Viswa Sadavisan turned a blind eye to the 34 million Chinese casualties and millions more displaced by the Japanese from the initial invasion of the Northern provinces to the end of WW II in China, or for that matter as a comparison to the so-called Tibet problem, the disappearance of millions of native Indians in NA? Where is your honesty and justice?Have you lost your objectivity and neutrality Mr?‘’Hypocrisy and double standard‘’ is the name of your game!!
@licliff43603 ай бұрын
煞笔
@wf6453 ай бұрын
Agree that Viswa, should have that covered. Than again, once can't possibly cover all angles and how his researchers are covering the angles to provide him with enough talking points and discusison.
@rogerfaint499Ай бұрын
3 years ago, Viswa was embroiled in a sexual harassment allegations. On 4 Feb 2021, Singaporean comedian Sharul Channa shared on fb that an "inappropriate and offensive" innuendo was made during an interview for an online series Inconvenient Questions by Viswa, who was the interrviewer. Viswa apologised on the same day after Sharul had reached out to his producer about eh sexual innuendo after the show. Thereafter, doctoral researcher Kiran Kandade shared screenshots of WhatsApp conversation between her and Viswa in 2016, of which he had asked he for a kiss. Despite Kandade trying to steer the conversation back to work related matters, Viswa persisted. (Source: Viswa Sadasivan Wikipedia).
@ewng87583 ай бұрын
Professor Kishore gave very subtle answers to challenging questions from the interviewer who seemed to be more pro west. Kishore's wisdom and experience as a seasoned diplomat shine from the interviews he gave and books he wrote.
@rodneytang3753 ай бұрын
提問者有立場,有問題!!!這世界,就是這些人把世界弄得混淆不清!注:不客觀能代表民眾發問嗎???
@tongfattho69133 ай бұрын
I actually was on the side of Professor Mahbubani with regard to his 2017 article. As a small country, we should be prudent in how we use our limited diplomatic ammunition. We should use it discreetly and decisively not recklessly, We have to be smart in picking our battles. The fact remains is that we are a small country. I am not a fan of Bilahari.
@sianzboi863 ай бұрын
kishore tries to remind the gov that LKY and the old guards are pragmatist and don't go harping on ideologies because that won't help Singapore navigate between the great powers in the world... bilahari was very cocky because he was in that ambassador position... he's trying hard to defend the stance of the gov even when we got into trouble by tilting too much to the western stance...
@joeylau55223 ай бұрын
香港人最中意馬凱碩教授🎉🎉🎉睇好多佢嘅演講
@swchan6152Ай бұрын
請不要代表所有香港人表達純粹是你個人的意見。
@philostreet7813 ай бұрын
This is the key in managing human affairs: “it is an art, not a science” :: Both opposing approaches can be correct at the same time depending on the different circumstances. Kishore is much wiser man ❤ 25:07
@TheStandlau3 ай бұрын
The nine dash lines were not drawn by China alone. They were there with the republic of China already.
@ZZZ-zl4mz3 ай бұрын
That's 11 dash line. Drew by ROC with help from US at the time. US donated military vessels to ROC to take control of whole S.C.Sea. The host is an ignorant and discriminative idiot!
@linhwang6651Ай бұрын
That is right. The original 11 dashed lines were drawn by Republic of China to show its marine territory with the request and assistence from USA, which provided the ships for the survey.
@frankvillager3 ай бұрын
Great respect to Prof Mahbubani, but cannot agree on his view this time that China's nine dashed lines are illegal because they undermine the UNCLOS (which came into effect much later). Not necessarily in favour of China's claims but think the logic seems problematic. For example, should the Western colonial powers give up all their occupied land and interests because the occupation undermines UN Charter?
@john-ss8hk3 ай бұрын
relevant point
@homemaster5803 ай бұрын
@@john-ss8hkgood question!
@linhwang6651Ай бұрын
The 9 dashed lines(previosly 11 dashed lines)were accepted, even by the Western powers which controlled the region, with no objection from any country, when China delinated its marine territory for the world to know. Most people were ignonant about this history.
@teogeorge3987Ай бұрын
Read the 11 dash line of the republic of China consitition of 1947. US did not protest at that time because the nationalist government of China was an ally of US at that time.
Hahaha…there is only one founding father in Singapore….i.e. LEE KUAN YU….no such thing as 3 founding fathers….by the way if kishore do not know the strategic history of 9 dash lines….go back and read China history…as time passes by you will realise the importance and significance of 9 dash line and the legitimacy of the line…..hahahaha
@teogeorge3987Ай бұрын
There is no such thing as founding father or father of the nation as enshrined under the Republic of Singapore consitution.