Glycolysis

[@tomorourke6301]

I must confess I really enjoy the complexity of this because so often people say that things are being overly complicated and although the presenter makes things as clear and simple as possible, it is very obvious that the complex processes give rise to wonderful insights , not easily glossed over with not too much sleep lost,

[@doriscastillo2188]

summarized input= glucose 1. phosphorilation of glucose output= glucose 6 phospate (by the enzyme hexokinase using 1 atp) 2. isomerization of glucose 6 phosphate into fructose 6 phosphate (by the enzyme phosphohexose ismomerase) 3. phosphorylatation of fructose 6 phosphate to form fructose 1,6- bisphosphate ( by the enzyme phosphofructokinase and by now total two ATP used ) 4. fructose-1, 6-bisphosphate is cleaved into two thr3e-carbon molecule called glñyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (by the enzyme adolase) glucos is a 6 carbon sugar and til now is a 2 three carbon sugar, but glycolisis only uses one of them glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and in the fift step dihydroxyacetone phosphate it became glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate by the enzyme triose phosphate isomerase 6. oxidation of glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate and became 1,3- bisphosphoglycerate (by the enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) oxidation means to loose an electron, that free electron reaches NAD+ and reduces it to became NADH 7. 1, 3-bisphosphoglycerate is converted into 3-phosphoglycerate (by phosphoglycerate kinase generating ATP) 8. 3-phosphoglycerate is converted into 2.phosphoglycerate (by the enzyme phosphoglyceromutase) 9. 2-phosphoglycerate is converted into phosphoenolpyruvate (by enolase) 10. phosphoenolpyruvate is converted into pyruvate (by pyruvate kinase) loss of atp at stage 1 and 3 creation of 2 atp in 7 and 10 step pyruvate and NADH

[@fumifoficial8338]

wow, very helpful

[@toddwasson3355]

Absolutely brilliant. Biologists blow my mind. Thanks so much for your wonderful videos!

[@ramilurazmanov]

It’s one of the best videos on this topic. It’s grossly underrated!!!

[@d-popov]

I think this is the best video on the subject! And the best models of the actual enzymes and molecules

[@MawaAlyafrosi]

I thank you, that makes most of things clear for me ❤️

[@NameNotAlreadyTaken2]

This is a good argument *against* intelligent design. Who would come up with something this nutty?

[@TehNetherlands]

@@truthisnotrelative7438 It does not prove that at all. There are a lot of seemingly unnecessary flaws and inefficiencies in biological systems.

[@TehNetherlands]

@@truthisnotrelative7438 It came here the same way it came to other planets, moons, asteroids and objects in space: through accretion processes over geological timescales. Ultimately, the heavier elements were and still are formed in the cores of stars as they fuse hydrogen into helium and other elements. Highly energetic events like supernovae generate and eject massive amounts of matter that can then again start the process of star and planet formation through accretion as gravitation, being one of the four fundamental forces, exerts an attractive force on particles.

[@TehNetherlands]

@@truthisnotrelative7438 I'm pretty sure I gave you the correct answer yesterday. Mind to tell me where I'm wrong?

[@TehNetherlands]

​@@truthisnotrelative7438 There is plenty of water on other planets and moons. Whether or not surface water can exist on a planetary surface depends on many factors, includings the proximity to its host star, the mechanisms behind its formation, its geology, etc. Mars does have water, although most of it appears to be either frozen or subterranean., while moons like Europa contain several times Earth's volume in water. Don't forget that while the Earth is 4.5 billion years old, it took in excess of 4 billion years for multicellular life to appear. Relatively few planetary systems appear to be this extraordinarily stable for such extended periods of time. The number of chemical reactions taking place on a planet like Earth, every second, is staggering. Some approximations put the number of atoms in the Earth at around 10^50. Many chemical reactions happen on the order of microseconds and nanoseconds. Now imagine 4500 million years of interaction between 10^50 chemical elements on nanosecond scale, and suddenly it becomes clear why certain extraordinarily rare events, events like abiogenesis, might actually be possible.

[@bonniebabird]

Think Name was makin a joke. GET IT??!?

[@patrickv391]

Can you explain when using a Ketone?

[@MatthewSmith-wh5dr]

Thank you..... just.... Thank you.....

[@eugeniaagnesrombelayuk1789]

thanks, this is utterly helpful

[@yasin2870]

Thank you so much :)

[@mahmoudmohmedkamal9160]

حلو جدا الفديو يا علي

[@BlueLightDiet]

And yet more radness

[@lachicatina]

How would be create another food

[@bookbrain7339]

Is there a live moving video?

[@johnnyace1300]

if we spent half as much as we did on our military as we did on education there would be but this is the best we have, one day if I ever have money I'll fund a team to make it happen and for all of orgo, LIVING MOVING REACTIONS

[@gregorysagegreene]

The prokaryote 'ATP and Electron-Carrier Generation' cycle.

[@veo_]

Do Ketosis!

[@KenJackson_US]

Who could believe that all those enzymes just happened by chance? Fascinating!

[@MrLikon7]

me

[@metcas]

Through billions of years of refinery, yes. That's a whole lot of chances.

[@Mbbsdoctorjobs]

@@truthisnotrelative7438 meathead......Life originated on earth around 3 bya ( billion years ago ) .....

[@jcn268]

I learn this is high school lol

[@sogannkaybetmispatates2959]

Keşke Türkçe'si olsa...

[@darkrider95bilmemney82]

Ah be kardeş :(

[@kridadounsattapong1533]

2s nob kvetch lrtt