Google Pixel 6 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max - Speed Test

Google Pixel 6 Pro vs iPhone 13 Pro Max speed test.
Check out the Anker 511 charger (Nano Pro): ankerfast.club/3kAZOrq
A full speed test comparison between Pixel 6 pro vs iPhone 13 Pro max including gaming, apps opening, boot up, ram management & more!
😁 🔔 SUBSCRIBE FOR DAILY VIDEOS: kzbin.info_c...
Checkout Pixel 6 vs Galaxy S21 camera test - • Google Pixel 6 Pro vs ...
❤️ MY SOCIAL MEDIA:
★ INSTAGRAM: / xeetechcare
★ TWITTER: / xeetechcare
🔥 Business Enquiries: [e-mail]
if you guys enjoyed the video then do smash that like button and Subscribe.❤️

[@F.B.I.gov.]

Wow Google really took the game to the next level (considering its a 1st gen chip) And the same performance of pixel 6 at $599,there is not even a competition at that price

[@ccbcco]

Pixel 6 is phone of the year. GPU matters much more than CPU for "real world performance" these days. This is why Pixel6 competes SO WELL in head to head side-by-side "simultaneous tap to launch comparisons" of Pixel v.Iphone that are suddenly sprouting up all over youTube. When you add in all of the other perks and conveniences of Google software and the price it's an unavoidable value preposition. Pixel is the best phone for the money and is already disrupting the marketspace. Pixel is going to grow market share faster than any other phone in the coming year. And if Google comes up with a new tensor CPU that benchmarks better than the latest Iphone chip they are going to get market share from Apple as well.

[@sarthakyadava]

@@ccbcco Bro it has 20core Mali Gpu , S21 Ultra had 12 core version ( i don't remember ) , it's definitely better if not out of the world

[@praetor5485]

@@sarthakyadava 14 cores* Still, that 20 core Mali GPU is pretty damn impressive

[@Fazer1971]

@@sarthakyadava the 14 core in the 2100 kept up with the snapdragon 888 the 20 core in the pixel is by far the best GPU set up so far in any phone. The 20 core in the pixel will blow past the 888 no problem.

[@lololololololol444]

Not really the same bc of the Ram and heating differences

[@nickosmas]

I find it pretty interesting how reviewers usually try to diminish android phone’s speed when comparing them to iPhones. During the boot up you said the Pixel was “about couple of seconds faster” than the iPhone when it was clearly waaaay faster. I’m most cases when the iPhone boots up faster the description is usually very different.

[@DavieParkes]

Also the tone in their voice like they are amazed or disappointed that the pixel opened 98% of apps faster. When the iPhone did open faster, much more praise is given or excuses handed out like sweets when it's slower.

[@charles-davidberube1174]

Well the boot up is really not important at all. In 3 years of having my iphone xr, i could count on my hands how many times i rebooted the phone. Just got the 13 pro and don’t plan on changing that habit.

[@nickosmas]

@@DavieParkes Totally agree with you. So much bias!

[@foxley95]

They had to save the iphone users some face, they just bought the phone because 'iphone is faster and smooth'

[@nickosmas]

@@foxley95 so true 🤣

[@ManosMe]

As to the Twitter scrolling "lag" of the pixel, that's only because of the amount of information that gets displayed on its screen as it's scrolling much faster than the iPhone! This gives the impression of better fluidity though on the iPhone...

[@jeremyoetken2094]

You are absolutely correct.

[@Daistra]

I was thinking the exact same thing. I'm pretty sure he scrolled through nearly double the amount of posts that the iPhone did.

[@rl95719]

I noticed this too

[@loganchamb]

I was gonna make this comment as well.

[@adrianlosch2111]

This triggered me so hard haha Like oh yes I swiped through those tweets so fast that no human being could ever figure out any of the and those little stutters must come from the chip not being able to handle the animation ... Yeah like no could be the loading time that comes with loading 50 instead of 10 tweets in the same amount of time. If you scroll like a normal person the faster scrolling speed is actually making the phone feel faster and more responsive than the iphone.

[@TheAviationistKhizr]

This test is great because, it shows the benchmarks don't necessarily mean its faster. Google's done well optimizing some of the apps. Also impressed with the iphones ram management with only ½ the ram

[@dattran3444]

Anyone with a good understanding of how these phones work would care much about benchmark. It isnt just abt the Chip when it comes down to the performance. The Tensor chip wasnt design to compete with A15 on how strong it can get. It is about a machine learning. With today technology, those number that show in benchmark will be reflected in real life performance with a difference in ms if not ns, which cant hardly tell from everyday usage.

[@elrafas2366]

_Heck yehh_

[@dexlus7593]

The iPhone 12 was faster than iPhone 13 and I think it takes time for games to be optimised for iphone13

[@rishabhrawat7856]

IOS geekbench scores aren't comparable to Android, different OS, different codes, different results.

[@TheAviationistKhizr]

@@rishabhrawat7856 tell me more

[@kimchithatisnicelyfermente4627]

At 899$, the Pixel 6 Pro performance is actually really solid, considering the 200$ difference comparing to the iPhone 13 Pro Max. It's what makes it so much more valuable.

[@nikolavonfulton5195]

I will say though for the 200 dollar difference you are getting some better specs. The display is significantly brighter. Faster processor. Better speakers.

[@tonywang9441]

LOL. I’m thinking the opposite. I would argue by spending just $200 more you’re getting so much more. Significantly brighter screen, significantly longer battery life, significantly more powerful processor (don’t be fooled by the app loading time on some light apps in the video, the processor difference will be huge 2-3 years down the line with the newest system software at that time).

[@superiortoall22]

@@nikolavonfulton5195 battery as well, the Pixel 6 got smoked in the battery test

[@koukous95]

@@tonywang9441 a pixel 2 runs as smooth if not smoother than an iPhone X... So what's this bs about processing? They are amazing but no multi-tasking, in day to day use its the same. The speakers aren't better in any way, look at Mrmobile for the audio comparison...

[@Demonhead1]

Paying 964 pounds for the pro cause fck the uk lol

[@p.nandhukutty7331]

I think Google optimised well to go head on with Apple. I really love the Pixel... ✌🏽

[@niklasgs1470]

12:35 iPhone lost, 13:22 the iphone refreshed also! You like ignoring it

[@Askeladd__._._]

That's right bro

[@pythondrink]

Ikr

[@raavananV]

This is just a first generation TENSOR.. !! it's gonna turn the market upside down in the future ....

[@m77mmdd19]

No It won’t

[@DorianHilton]

*Android Market

[@sagea.r.t497]

@@m77mmdd19 yes

[@m77mmdd19]

@@sagea.r.t497 it’s good but it’s not gonna blow up the market

[@edisagovic4049]

@@m77mmdd19 Google is Android, Google is Tensor, so it will be super powerful, just wait.....

[@ricconamz5501]

This proves my argument I just had with someone the other day, numbers in these benchmarks are hit or miss but real life performance and optimisation matters more.. Give google 1 or 2 more generations and they should be on a whole different level,that's if they don't get comfortable with what they have attained so far.

[@wellszhou8286]

No, once you got into intensive apps like Genshin Impact or other intensive apps and once applications gets more demanding, then the numbers of the benchmarks matter

[@lkay398]

@@wellszhou8286Which doesn't matter for 99% of users.

[@DorianHilton]

@@lkay398 if the numbers didn't matter, 99% of the people would be happy with a SD765. Numbers also matters when using the camera (for example) where the pixel can't process all the AI in real time, it's power relays entirely on postprocessing; another example is long-sustained performance (not only playing for 5 minutes), overheating, etc.

[@lkay398]

@@DorianHilton 99% of people overpay for technology and performance/power they don't need. Most people would be just fine with a SD765. Average phone users literally just call text email check socials, watch youtube, and play small games.

[@lkay398]

Billions of cell phone users around the world. How many of them do you really think are hardcore genshin impact players, or use all the tools that flagship cameras offer, or export 4k video, or anything remotely intensive?

[@mayansajid]

"Unlimited Entertainment, just don't get into this application. " 😂😂😂😂😂 Lol.

[@yadukrishnanp681]

Benchmarks doesn't matter at all. And Google just proved it! It's just the experience that one should care about before buying a smartphone. I'm very surprised. But I'm pretty sure it'll be different for different people. It's just so great that we now have an Android that can compete well with Apple, and that being the makers of Android, Google themselves!

[@angycucumber4319]

@@CineXpressOfficial You're not very clever, are you? I don't think you realise that the only reason PUBG felt smoother on iPhone was that the framerate on the pixel was capped at 60Hz. Also, do you think Google and Samsung are the same thing?

[@dervillager8038]

@@CineXpressOfficial the pixel is brand new so there isnt 120Hz support in all apps just as there wasnt on the iphone when it was brand new. it will get optimized soon enough!

[@Vairoonzeng]

@@CineXpressOfficial samsung is shit tier when it come to software optimize. only pixel and oneplus are the best for android. they are still smooth and fast after serveral years of heavy using. and I know because I have so many flagship android devices. I personally prefer android over ios because of flexibillity and customization so I want only the best of android experiance

[@dervillager8038]

@@CineXpressOfficial 120fps scrolling wasnt supported in most apps when the iphone came out because it is new just like it isnt fully supported on the new pixel 6 pro yet

[@yoshatabi]

@@CineXpressOfficial that's because the s21 sucks and their software is absolutely horrid. Don't understand why anyone would like those phones. The only Android phones worth getting are pixels. Other androids are Walmart Androids

[@M.O.X_x1]

13:00 turn off adaptive battery feature

[@elrafas2366]

1:07 _EPIC!_ 3:43 _When the high-end software optimization comes in_ 4:43 _Mind blowing. Really surprising for me guys. Is the real-live hardware and software optimize._ 5:33 _I was sure that Google came to take the game to the next level_ 👌🏻 7:23 _Epic speed test_

[@ihategooogle]

I haven't finished watching the whole test but regardless who won can we at least agree than flagship smartphones today are more than powerful and fast enough for our everyday use? Longevity test is far more important than speed test I believe, especially during these times where people are holding on to their phones longer before upgrading. Reviewers should do a phone longevity test every few months to help people evaluate the reliability and trustworthiness of different phone models and brands.

[@user-ix6th9un1u]

In this case longevity is the ace advantage of an iPhone

[@darthraider450]

@@user-ix6th9un1u yep, top tier software support that kicked off yesterday with iOS 15.1, and will be coming throughout the next 5 years at least. Google doing 3 years with the Pixel 6 then another 2 years of security updates. Samsung, Xiaomi, Huawei/Honor, OnePlus can't match that at all.

[@gao1812]

@@darthraider450 Today's Galaxies already have the features that iphones will only get five years from now if ever. iOS is famous for bringing too little too late and for making older iphones sluggish. Update quality > update quantity

[@agoualeykouadio4968]

Nowadays, smartphones have about the same lifespan when it comes to hardware. It is at the software level that it can have particular attitudes over time, depending on the smartphone and the policy of manufacturers. For example, when a manufacturer such as Apple defends the logic according to which IOS updates reduce the performance of old IPHONEs to ensure them a bright future, on what does the longevity of the smartphone depend in this case? Let's face it, all smartphones are the same when it comes to longevity and this despite the components especially in the high-end. People really want numbers, they want performance. They want to know who does better than the other or who has this that the other does not have. To conclude, we are mostly influenced by numbers. This kind of video answers the question of numbers but it is not a video that necessarily leads to a purchase. The question of purchase comes from the perception of each one in front of the product.

[@STALKER777LK]

@@user-ix6th9un1u hm Ain't that literally why google changed the chip? And... They got the second best longevity already (if I recall correctly)

[@JaredClarkBoaz]

I think a lot of the "lag" when scrolling is due to the Pixel scrolling much more than the iPhone and having to load much more than the iPhone.

[@b11480]

Yep I've always said that. The Twitter app is a bit buggy at the moment but other than that it's just because it scrolls so much faster than the iPhone so it need to load everything up far quicker. Once opened if you go back to the top and re scroll the pixel feels smoother than the iPhone doing the same. I personally like the faster scroll that android has.

[@charles-davidberube1174]

@@b11480 and i prefer slower scroll, there’s a phone for everyone i guess!

[@CrossedSabresCOD]

Yep, a lot of it is just illusory. I'm a huge Android phone guy, but iOS just has the most fluid animations, hands down, so it appears smoother.

[@Schlaupelz]

The pixel is scrolling much faster than the iPhone, that's why it's stuttering and the iPhone isn't.

[@charles-davidberube1174]

Having tried both, i hated the fast scrolling… half of the time, it would decide out of nowhere to scroll super fast past what i wanted to see 😂

[@abuyaska9112]

@@charles-davidberube1174 am using 90hz reno 6 5g. Impressive for me buttery. I have not tried 120hz yet.

[@bhavyajain2427]

@@charles-davidberube1174 it never happened with me on my 120hz phone It depends on your pace how fast u scroll.in 120hz u don't see jitter or frame tearing unlike 60hz

[@dantan7881]

It is a very interesting thing! For the iPhone, it deliberately slows down scrolling so you "feel" it's smoother. While the Pixel loads everything at you at the expense of being jittery. Really interesting how Android and iOS differ.

[@bhavyajain2427]

@@dantan7881 its a bug in pixel otherwise 120hz is always smooth Use it and u will know the difference right away

[@Vijay-pg2ek]

I guess the reason for pixel not keeping games in memory is because the phone has to adapt itself to whatever we do on a daily basis. So if we play games regularly then it's gonna learn and keep them in memory

[@shankughosh841]

Nice

[@ionconnor1991]

Bullshit😂 how dumb you should be to buy a pixel instead of an iPhone

[@FE0070]

@@ionconnor1991 ??

[@Gabriel-ue3jf]

@@ionconnor1991 those who don't want to take part into apple's prison-like ecosystem?

[@charles-davidberube1174]

@@ionconnor1991 i have an iphone 13 pro and i still believe saying what you said is stupid and makes no sense😂

[@Divy.]

Your speed tests are the best

[@GameN3rdz]

👀

[@samuelshiels4608]

I was so surprised that the tensor was able to keep up as well as it did for an Android. Even though the specs are not as impressive it shows what good optimization can really do for a phone. Given that this is a first gen chip it really gave a good first impression and I can't wait to see what Google does next with updates and the Pixel 7 and 6a.

[@ancientslav4863]

+ Tensor G1 and now G2 were made intention for AI learning, processing and not super speed or gaming.

[@afoolserrand]

Thanks for the review. I think some of the tests were so close it comes down to human error, but both of them are great phones!

[@Afrokk]

The Pixel 6 Pro performs exceptionally well considering it's price at $899! SOLIDDDD 🔥✊

[@faiqahmed4454]

sad

[@Mtty-ew9nv]

That where the price should be for pixel considering the material they used.

[@benjmiester]

Not to mention you can get the same on the regular pixel for $599 but limited to 90hz on the screen refresh

[@angycucumber4319]

@@benjmiester It has less RAM though

[@nagaveni0711]

@@angycucumber4319 and 1080p screen along with a different camera sensor

[@CRYboytoy]

It doesn’t matter how fast app is open it is matter how long they can hold performance

[@eloquentblack]

one more proof that benchmarks mean nothing

[@angycucumber4319]

iPhone got double the pixel in a benchmark haha

[@benjmiester]

@@angycucumber4319 They gotta make their $$$. Benchmark apps figured out they can tailor specific calculations to benefit certain phones scores to please certain crowds. That makes them want to download the app more and rely on the scores more.

[@Hornetclaw]

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 😂😂😂 this is what a lot of people don’t know

[@wandywan2444]

Pls trust benchmark,which phone loads up the apps faster is nothing

[@benjmiester]

@CR45H 0V3RR1D3 This genuinely made me laugh. A lot! Literally everyone opens apps on their phone. Dozens to hundreds of times a day, all day long. Every day. On the other side... Maybe 0.5 to 1% or so of the smartphone population renders videos on their phone. Maybe. That's a very generous estimate based on if every KZbin video was a separate uploader which they definitely aren't. Even still, of all of the tiny amount of people rendering videos in the 1st place... Most are actual professionals/creators doing it for work proposes and so they're doing it on a laptop or a desktop computer that's far faster and easier to edit on than any phone. So this is saying we should disregard the vastly vastly vastly fuck it let's throw in another vastly because it's so infinitely much more important usage case to favor the completely niche usage case that almost nobody uses and even then it's a few times a month tops for a few videos. Legit hilarious! Couldn't get any more ridiculous! 🤣

[@JoshsBookishVoyage]

No way anyone could prefer a larger bar to a small cut out. It's interesting how far ahead Apple is with the benchmarks yet still failing in real world applications.

[@steve9348]

Just remember their software is not even finalize yet , regular people get it Thursday I believe

[@justmeditate98yearsagoedit23]

I'm a regular person and my pixel 6 just arrived 10 minutes ago

[@TempestTemple]

@@justmeditate98yearsagoedit23 Yeah Thursday is the street date but Google seems to be sending them out early, mine is scheduled for tomorrow

[@BackDaws]

@@justmeditate98yearsagoedit23 jammy sod, I've not even had a dispatch email yet

[@sashank224]

@@justmeditate98yearsagoedit23 I'm regular also

[@EtechnoTechno]

Hopefully tecknick is able to get his hands on a pixel 6 pro. He's the only one who does speed tests properly

[@altri_jpg]

so good for first gen tensor, new exynos is going to have rdna2 and im sure tensor gen 2 will as well since its based on exynos

[@jaughnekow]

They're both great chips. Just that everyone is curious about how good the tensor chip will be up against apple's A Chip

[@dervillager8038]

interesting how a phone that has much lower benchmarks beats the iphone almost everywhere i just hope games will get optimized for tensor so it will get 120Hz option with extreme graphics and btw 9:42 the lag on twitter is a bug on any android device no matter how old it is it has exactly the same stutters since a new update so that will get fixed soon enough i think the pixel only keeps one game in the ram for battery saving i mean who even has multiple games in ram anyways

[@Whatsthisbuttondo1]

Chips in a computer or a phone haven’t got a huge amount to do with loading times. It’s mostly down to storage speed

[@alexlarsen6413]

Wow, that was really surprising! Also, are you sure the iPhone was set to 120hz, because it didn't look that way while scrolling next to the Pixel? Might be a camera thing.

[@samuraisings5105]

The 120hz on Android is way smoother

[@jacure123]

Most of the time it doesn't do that . That's how they get great battery life .

[@alexlarsen6413]

@@jacure123 The iPhone 13 also has great battery life, amazing actually.

[@alexlarsen6413]

@@samuraisings5105 Ah, I see. I haven't tried out the iPhone 13 pro variants myself, I only saw them on screen.

[@DorianHilton]

@@samuraisings5105 no it's not

[@TheNightquaker]

3:02 my dude really be testing flagship SoCs with Subway Surfers 😄

[@deplaystationforme8354]

Apple's ram management is unparallel. Google definitely can work on that more. I am impressed how Google could open the games quicker than Apple. Tensor has a lot of potential!

[@D-Thang_]

You clearly see that the Tensor is faster yet you talk about potential. It already smashed the 13 pro max.

[@geffreycaruso2411]

This just proves the benchmark scores are somewhat pointless and useless as any kind of determination of real world performance.

[@The-Heart-Will-Testify]

It's pointless, but fanboys love the spec on Paper and not in real life

[@paulfoeller4866]

Opening Geekbench and Geekbench results are an interesting juxtaposition. The Pixel loaded it noticeably faster, but the iPhone crushed it in the score. Real world use wise, the Pixel is at least as fast at the iPhone.

[@mrdadecounty3056]

Wow tensor is pretty fast , I'll give them that , I've seen other ram management where they were even , they both loaded 1 app only again , so it's got to be certain apps are more optimized then others

[@maxwellyanbor4336]

Google put in a lot of efforts on it pixel 6 and 6 Pro

[@pijesz]

Android 12 have a lot of speed improvements as mentioned by Google during the IO. Other phones will benefit from it too.

[@forsakenwarlord5752]

And also on the games closing out and having to restart probably has to do with a setting for the pixel closing down apps to save on memory. That doesn't necessarily mean that they couldn't run that app but it's probably set up so that it does that by default.

[@bunnygirl8482]

Hey, little suggestion do Speed test on Phones which are 1 year old. (Moderately used ones not brand new) that's gonna help us to choose which brands phones tend to do better after year of usage also it will be better for Nature because people don't need to upgrade phones every year.

[@PeterMurrayj]

Going to watch to see if I can figure out why speed matters. Haven’t had a phone that I’ve noticed was “slow” in like 10 years….

[@4rshhh]

Fr man Who cares if your phone opens an application 0.004 seconds faster

[@twell609]

When numbers lie! Looked like iPhone refreshed Geekbench and asphalt he really wanted iPhone to win

[@danish__official5374]

What's up Zaryab bhai? Glad to be back here. Great content as always! Tensor surprised A15 Bionic.

[@pabgaming5326]

Between 5:06 - 5:09 hired a fart💥 sound too 😹😹😹

[@Aman-xo4yx]

Tensor is really good ✨

[@ridalger16]

Pixel 6 is cheaper with a better screen layout (F the notch) and can be faster than the iPhone 13 Pro Max lmao

[@angycucumber4319]

It is faster than the iPhone.

[@Hornetclaw]

You are confusing this whole thing, I don’t think is ever possible for this pixel 6 pro to even get faster than iPhone 12, and about the notch, When it comes to unlocking a phone, Face ID just works, and it works well. And that’s largely because it does need all the tech that Apple fits in (including the various sensors, IR emitters, and the actual front-facing camera.) Android phones don’t have notches like the iPhone, but they also don’t have facial unlock systems that work nearly as well. And if a notch is the price to pay for convenience, it’s the one to accept, and I want you to know the new pixel are quite good but the whole comparison with the iPhone 13 Pro max feels like a massacre. LoL.

[@ridalger16]

@@Hornetclaw the lies you have to tell yourself to be able to sleep at night huh

[@Hornetclaw]

@@ridalger16 and the lies you’ve told yourself is that you’ve got a brain to work with lol 😂.

[@ridalger16]

@@Hornetclaw yep, you basically just confirmed what I thought about you.

[@aboodi828]

I want to ask I see the wifi is full on the Iphone and half on the pixel Is it the same wifi connection or not?

[@Deepak_2315]

When speed test became internet speed test

[@jonascoscom]

I believe the scroll issue is due to the screen switching from framerates

[@sukhmeetsinghsodhi3261]

that twitter scrolling is much faster on pixel, that stuttering might just also be internet speed

[@lethaboelvismahlangu4869]

Yes. Because iPhone detects the speed you want to scroll it can’t scroll fast on all occasions

[@DorianHilton]

what's the point of scrolling that fast? where you literally can't read anything 🤣

[@SunshineVocals]

The pixel loads at least 3 times the content of the iPhone because of how much faster it scrolls. So yeah loading all that it has to shutter a little... totally expected.

[@SunshineVocals]

@@DorianHilton when you want to get to the bottom or top fast, it is useful.

[@DorianHilton]

@@SunshineVocals once every month 🤣🤣🤣 and in that case, the iPhone has the option to touch the upper screen to return to the first tweet, and it works wit all social media; you don’t need to do that absurd fast scrolling 🤣🤣🤣

[@ChristianParpartDev]

You compare networking applications just be looking at them without considering network traffic implications nor the fact that different content to be loaded can significantly impact the end result. :)

[@kiranbathula4275]

I am waiting for this test for longtime finally thanks for uploading it

[@tagoojoemar836]

The overall performance and battery management on Apple is great, but Google is indeed catching up.

[@rajeshbedi]

dude what catching up.. google was faster here, its apple who is catching up..

[@tagoojoemar836]

@@rajeshbedi I am referring to the overall performance, not just the app start-up.

[@MaDFroG88]

Indeed totally unexpected but pleasantly surprised!

[@DorianHilton]

You can't say that is "catching up" when the pixel literally can't process in real time all the HDR and AI stuff on the camera. It's entirely postprocessing.

[@danishdhar8374]

Google has really optimised the pixel 6 pro. I can only imagine how better the pixel 7 pro would be in future. Also I never believe in benchmarks because those are just shitty numbers, it's the real life performance that matters to me. Pixel has officially taken the crown in boot up time.

[@deathrowy2k]

You have some setting (battery saver or something) different on your pixel 6 pro with the ram management. I have seen other tests like this and pixel 6 kept almost everything in memory usually better than the iphone.

[@river.]

Nice video😌😌. Also One suggestion. Please publish the video in 60 fps also. It helps in judging the smoothness of ui during comparison .

[@basedsomali8852]

Both Are Impressive❤🤞

[@GeekAbhishek]

I am all set for today's night

[@angycucumber4319]

Haha

[@SmokechedaDaassghetta]

Do you go and comment everywhere, my guy.

[@nagaveni0711]

Big fan abhishek bhai good 2 see u here🥰

[@itzAyush7z]

What u are doing tonight?

[@nikhilv2840]

Could've written 'tonight' instead of 'today's night'. 😁

[@urbnized]

Im wondering because I feel the phones were connected to different networks. They are right next to each other and one has a different signal strength than the other. Im wondering why that is?

[@borijosue19]

When scrolling up through apps, the invite wasn't another loading. It was just sliding slower and items per finger slide there fore it's less loading. The pixel was sliding much faster and way more items per finger slide so it has to load way more data. Either way there both fast

[@androidonly4388]

Twitter developer: lets lower the scrolling sensitivity in ios vers so the iphone will look smoother 😎

[@hdtvkeith1604]

The Pixel OLED pops better on the games and such that the Apple looks like a LCD vs. an OLED.

[@charles-davidberube1174]

That’s only because the iphone has hotter tint to it and android phones tend to be more bluish

[@Eduaardojc]

The oled on the iphone is way better quality and better overall even marques browne admit it, crazy how you say it looks like an lcd..

[@hdtvkeith1604]

@@Eduaardojc In this video the iPhone looks washed out, could be glare off the screen, but the pop on the Pixel just looks better.

[@mrnub4813]

For twitter, the iPhone is smoother in scrolling because the phone has been out for longer with it's 120hz, giving them the chance to optimize it for more apps, the pixel however is still brand new, but it should work just as smooth soon.

[@noone5539]

Omg that gmail notif count though

[@alvarez321]

Every single speed test for the past few years has had the same result. The ONLY thing these test prove is that Benchmark scores really don't mean anything. The only time it makes a difference is in video rendering. And honestly who really uses that feature?

[@androidonly4388]

True, i only render full hd video, and pretty quick result from my cheap phone

[@The-Heart-Will-Testify]

It's weird how Xperia 1 iii video rendering is faster than iphone lol

[@mythbuster4315]

I think google is making their chip look less powerful on geekbench on purpose, lmao no way that thing is so far behind. It smoked the iPhone

[@zimranchaudhry1987]

Yeah true Google smashed it with Tensor core and their polished UI 4.0 optimisation. Keep it up Google! Your performance is looking promising. 👌👌👌👍👍👍👍

[@andyH_England]

…see Speedtest G and you will see how far behind the Tensor chip is doing stuff, and the benchmarks in fact make them seem better than they are. The S21U on Exynos beat it by 20 seconds doing several intensive tasks and the iPhone is 10+ seconds ahead of the SD888! So, no, not really. The above tests are mainly to do with optimisations and single core performance, not multi-core or GPU and those are where the Tensor trails.

[@zimranchaudhry1987]

Performance with the price point makes this phone a better value than Iphone 13 pro max. Geekbench is useless piece of crap software so don't believe it.

[@andyH_England]

@@zimranchaudhry1987 Yes, never use benchmarks, Pixel is about enhancements, software and the extra tech. These all mean that the Tensor can be tweaked to perform far better than the benchmarks show. I agree with you. Just saying that no way is the pure power of the Tensor more than the A15 chip but as you say that is not the whole story. I also got £350 free headphones with my Pixel 6Pro and £90 off for loyalty (ONE subscriber) so the price point is much lower than even the sticker prices. Even with that I will admit the A15 is the beast and best by far in absolute performance.

[@flicka25]

I don't know why people look at that....it does not translate in real life usage.

[@shaunandeva32]

What did you shoot this video on?

[@nguyenism]

During the Twitter test, the scroll on pixel was much heavier on the pixel, meaning with one scroll you go through a lot more content. The chip had to load more posts than in the Iphone in that particular test, that could be a reason as why there was stuttering, Iphone limits this by having the scrolling at a slower rate.

[@blasterzone100]

Exactly, can be because the internet speed is not enough to load the content

[@liv2.9]

Android is getting better and better everyday

[@danielayers8787]

Android is the best

[@liv2.9]

@@danielayers8787 no, iOS is aesthetically pleasing to my eyes

[@davidcoghill8612]

I've always been an android person, but I admit I'm so happy to see Apple has finally taken a step back from the obsession with ultra-thin phones. Now I just hope other brands will follow suit, it would be nice to go back to having phones that give you something to actually hold onto.

[@wisdomyaw03]

The iPhone is still thin though. It's 7.7mm compared to Pixel's 8.9mm

[@chaseeb4563]

@@wisdomyaw03 nothing like the older iPhones, ex. iPhone 6, 6.9mm

[@kadafi_squats6507]

Your iPhone looks like it's set on 60 hz...or are iPhones purposefully set to scroll slowly?

[@starringstudent]

Is your review model is 128GB or 256GB? the reason i asked because in the iphones the 128GB R/W speeds are different from the 256GB

[@lawiabekahabeiku]

I think google should continue releasing just 2 phones in every generation rather than filling the whole world with under optimized phones like Samsung does Samsung: good hardware with less optimization Google :lesser hardware but with the best optimization Google please save android

[@vascomorais639]

Samsung already have the best optimization

[@M.O.X_x1]

The A15 bionic is a liar😹

[@benjmiester]

Lol well it's still good but just people have to learn that these benchmark # don't really mean jack for real world use. Funny thing is it used to be the opposite too. In like 2009 or so Samsungs/HTCs etc had huge benchmarks but they were still a little laggy and iphones were butter smooth despite mediocre benchmark scores.

[@M.O.X_x1]

@@benjmiester true👌🏻💯

[@iammatthews]

I would disagree giving the win to Twitter app on the iPhone, did you notice the amount of tweets you scrolled on the Pixel? is like 4 times more than you'd scroll on the iPhone, and definitely trying to load up the content would stop the device scroll if it hasn't fully loaded the tweets below. I wonder why people do not see that iPhone scrolling is slowed down, not nearly as fast as the Pixel

[@starley_]

Considering the fact that the Tensor chip is mainly designed for machine learning/AI and not for performance, Android 12 still needing some optimization and that developers still need to optimize their apps for a completely new chip, the Pixel 6 Pro did a very very good job. Probably gonna be my next phone And once again: Benchmarks do not respresent real world performance

[@rajayush2524]

Koi iphone 13 pro max blue colour arrange krado ,!!! Saala kahin bhi stock mei nhi hai !!!

[@itsyoboigucci7578]

Wow im really impressed with tensor chip here considering its a first gen chip and its not even the most high end chip either. And im more impressed with what google did here with android 12, they really optimized it to go well together with tensor chip here. Really excited for future software updates improvements. Also the most saddening thing is that this phone isn't even available to buy in my place even if i wanted to.

[@avi9724]

Could you share the wallpaper you used to your iphone13 pro max. Thanks

[@fahadabdulahad9358]

Twitter for android has been really buggy and laggy for the last couple of updates so that could be the reason tensor is struggling there

[@MasterofOrion]

Samsung and Google!! IMPRESSIVE!

[@SapSapient]

High end phones are all really fast. Honestly, I think loading times that are within a half-second of each other are ties for all practical purposes. I wouldn't keep running those tests trying to figure out which phone is technically first. The game loading times were interesting. The video rendering seems like it will always go to iPhones. The refreshing on the Pixel for loaded applications was shocking. Hopefully the memory issues will be fixed in an update.

[@willowdemetriou]

I agree. Rendering speed tests and gaming performance is much more informative to a user than the nanosecond difference in loading of an app

[@benjmiester]

Well don't be so sure. Juan Bagnell, Some Gadget Guy has been doing a great running segment about real world performance vs benchmarks and TLDR version the old Pixel 4 XL chews through video processing the absolute fastest and has gotten faster and faster over time. Pixel 6 included. SD 888 phones, iPhone all of it. Part of that is it had a secondary processing chip built in alongside it's main SOC. That's now built in to Tenso, so could get interesting in the future.

[@SapSapient]

@@benjmiester Interesting. Thanks for the info.

[@SabinTV-NP]

Anker be sponsoring all the tech KZbinrs lmao. They do deserve all the attention though. Their products are really good.

[@unpossible9747]

Ya they are the king .

[@noegamboa9924]

Would of loved to see augmented reality speed tests

[@gen4790]

U can clearly see there network frequency at top of screens are different and no touch is going to be at same time exact . Pixel wins overall

[@Driftyy]

Test should be done offline

[@Lollakuk]

APPLE IS A JOKE! So much faster on pure numbers but SUCKS at real life performance!

[@pawelbu4672]

how finger print unlocking worked for you on pixel 6?

[@StrongerThanEver84]

im sure future google updates will fix alot of issues with the phone. also its their 1st ever chip. impressive stuff

[@c0rtin3x]

Did he take into comparison that the Pixel 6 Pro took 1.5 minutes more on Premiere Rush? 1.5 minutes seem like quite a substantial amount of time to consider.

[@EdwardBartel]

Did you notice that the in app Twitter scrolling was much faster on the Pixel? Maybe it was lagging because it was loading far more posts than what the iPhone was doing???

[@lowkeygaming4716]

10:04 I think the twitter stutters in pixel because it loads the resources. If you notice the android loads more posts than the iphone when you're scrolling posts for the first time. iPhone only have the same speed scrolling when you go back to the posts you have already loaded.

[@Mitchy_Witchy]

Why does the WIFI appear weaker on the Pixel? The iPhone has full bars but the Pixel doesn't? I've never used an iPhone before so I'm not sure how the WIFI logo should look in the notification area.

[@HipHopCantSaveMe]

I picked up a couple of the Anker chargers, they are great!

[@lethaboelvismahlangu4869]

What was the iOS version on the iPhone because Apple said the had Modem/network issues that is why asphalt took time to load

[@TheOriginalSageNations]

This man doesn’t sleep 😄 I appreciate the effort.

[@MobileTechPoint]

I love that iPhone wallpaper. ❤️ can you link it please ? 💙❤️💚💛🧡

[@psycho0815]

Very refreshing to see a real world test and not the same geekbench/3dmark numbers again. And not the big difference one would expect from those numbers. I'm not sure if the IPhone is worth the extra 200-300€/$ if you don't plan to render videos.

[@that_Kanti]

At 12:36 😐. Geekbench part is cut . Any video part is missing

[@nowajishrafi]

Love ur videos💙

[@petergilang2997]

Why pixel only has half bar wifi connection during the test while iphone is almost full even full sometimes?