Graham Hancock: Great Pyramid’s Dimensions NOT Random

[@HowardHamlin-mv9rq]

Great video! Also I must say, in Graham's recent debate with Flint Dibble, Flint made an extreme statistical error in an attempt to disprove these proportions of the pyramid. Here is the error: The significance is the fact that (with the Pyramid) the two events scale in proportion to one constant. Whereas the Parthenon & the 420 example consists of just one event scaling to a constant (which is statistically shown to be ad hoc and can be done with the scaling of random objects in one's backyard as oppose to the Pyramid situation, which cannot just be ruled out.) Step 1: -Pyramid: two linked events: (A) The base perimeter scales to Earth's circumference, and (B) The height scales to Earth's polar radius, BOTH using the constant. -Parthenon: there is just one event: (C) The number of columns scales to Earth's circumference with a constant. (A: The probability that the base perimeter of the Pyramid of Giza aligns with Earth’s circumference when multiplied by a specific constant. B: The probability that the height of the Pyramid of Giza aligns with Earth’s polar radius when multiplied by the same constant. C: The probability that the number of columns at the Parthenon aligns with Earth's circumference when multiplied by a different constant.) Statistical Analysis: Null Hypothesis : The alignment of Pyramid measurements with Earth dimensions using a single multiplier is due to chance. OR Alternative Hypothesis : The alignment is not due to chance and indicates a non-random relationship. Pyramid: The joint probability of two independent events (A and B for the Pyramid) both happening by chance would be calculated as P(A∩B)=P(A)×P(B), assuming independence. Parthenon: The probability of event C happening by chance is simply P(C) If P(A)=P(B)=P(C)=1/10,000 (just as a rough example to illustrate), which is about 10,000 reasonable scale factors might yield a match, then: P(A∩B)=(1/10,000)×(1/10,000)=1/100,000,000. Conclusion: It is much less likely (one in a hundred million versus one in ten thousand) for the two perpendicular measurements of the Pyramid to coincidentally align with Earth's dimensions using the same multiplier compared to the Parthenon's single alignment. (These results stay the same and are just as drastic regardless of whether the scaling factor is 1,000 or 100million...) Long story short. These proportions of the Pyramid are not a coincidence... Graham is 100% correct on this one.

[@AncientMysteriesAndInnovations]

Hit the subscribe and 👍 button if you find this fascinating ❤️

[@lyndalardies5399]

Wow. I'm amazed

[@shauncampbell969]

Enjoyable

[@stevefaure415]

Oh Lord.

[@4057hofft]

It may have the dimensions, but the earth may be flat. Its said that earth is 70%water and water always finds it's level. So the earth is at least 70% flat and level

[@azarpiano]

I'm reporting you for thinking outside the collective.

[@wayawolf-ox8zp]

Water line level see flat theory flooding rain collect rain stick out of balance 2340