Damn I gotta check up your channel see what you been building.
@calipergarageАй бұрын
The noises this thing makes are just epic!
@lucasblanchard47Ай бұрын
That looks like a FUN car! I want to get a CRX or an EG hatch someday. Much love from Texas.
@BETTALIFE10112 күн бұрын
By the time you grow up. The care will be scrap metal.
@nicolashuffman4312Ай бұрын
Cool car! Simplify, and add lightness! Man, I miss the old GRM. I was a subscriber for something like 15 years.
@lordraiden5398Ай бұрын
Had a 89 CRX-Si for 13 years. It had 320,000 fun miles on it. I sold it in 2002 after purchasing a WRX. Still have the WRX.
@BETTALIFE10112 күн бұрын
Big mistake you made.
@carlosgarza1962Ай бұрын
Andy's crx is a killer car. Great guy too
@tRickBeeeАй бұрын
One easy piece of weight savings missed..... The Garage Door Clicker!... (awesome video presentation)
@GrassrootsmotorsportsАй бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@mattpartain29Ай бұрын
This car also doesn’t sound like the typical “race” Honda. You can tell it’s modified but it doesn’t make your ears want to bleed. It’s very well done.
@BETTALIFE10112 күн бұрын
It’s a b series. It’s got a lower deep tone.
@carsnpyro348428 күн бұрын
This is what you call a fast driver. Anyone can be fast on the straight away.
@machina_spiritАй бұрын
Love this build! What model MOMO wheel is that? Also what HANS do you wear? I noticed it has a much shorter profile that doesn’t interfere into the bucket seat headrest area like my HANS III does to my Recaro Pole Postion seat
@DQSpiderАй бұрын
Man, E85 has really changed the game...
@JoeMomma-yk6qb21 күн бұрын
Try a un-even road state road, at night, straight running it hard, taking turns at high speed
@DTEL77Ай бұрын
Uhhhh, safety steward here. I want to see those garage door openers removed. They can slip off and get under brake pedals.
@Nathan_King28 күн бұрын
I saw that too. Made me laugh! You're not wrong though.
@alfa164lsАй бұрын
Surprised you are allowed a half cage
@AndyFuntownАй бұрын
SCCAs TT classing is laughable.
@BigRichard_Ай бұрын
Why is that?
@AndyFuntownАй бұрын
@BigRichard_ Go check the classing and look what cars are grouped together. They also specify minimum weight in vague hand wavy terms, but no one is ever weighed. I just compete in unlimited now when I go to TTNats rather than try and deal with it. They do it, presumably, for accessibility - since NASA TT you need a dyno sheet, but if you're just looking to be on track any random HPDE gets you more seat time for cheaper.
@ApexwithDavinАй бұрын
@BigRichard_ Normally because either 1) Cars get classed out because someone brings a make/model that just destroys the rest, so no one is having fun. 2) Or they make so many niche classes that everyone is a winner.
@AndyFuntownАй бұрын
@@ApexwithDavin I replied to Richard, but KZbin nuked my comment? You summed it up nicely. If you just want to go to the track for fun, most HPDE groups give you more track time for cheaper. If you want to compete NASA TT classing isn't perfect, but it's a lot better, etc. SCCA is trying to make it more accessible - which is admirable, but the classing really needs some work.
@ch_chone28 күн бұрын
@@AndyFuntown yep. I wish Sport classes were dropped entirely. Keep Tuner as it is because the Tuner/Street Touring crossover/dual duty thing is where a lot of enthusiasts end up anyway. Then make Max and Unlimited into power-to-weight classes with dyno sheet required. Call out a power-weight target and a max hp per class. Done. Drop the "modified" stuff and "OE displacement" stuff for building an engine. Infinite creativity to have whatever flavor of fun you want. That would cut down total number of classes to 5 Tuner, 5 Max, and 2 Unlimited. Plus the Max & unlimited classes would be way easier to navigate. I don't think the 2025 redo of Max classing went far enough for simplification, TBH. See the November fastrack if you haven't already. Sport classes can stay in Autocross. Tuner would have higher participation/deeper fields. Max would be easier to navigate and let the creativity flow. Unlimited would still be unlimited.