Hopefully for my grandchildren, we will have another generation of young people with that level of courage. Not a desire for for war, but the courage to fight.
@brucefale61323 жыл бұрын
I doubt it. Millennials are too pampered and soft.
@glendrine3 жыл бұрын
@@brucefale6132 I don't know, a lot of the junior officers and noncoms were brought up in the "jazz age". They were considered "soft" and "self-absorbed" by their parents. It's tough to judge what people will do in a crisis without actually throwing them into one.
@MoltenUprisingMK3 жыл бұрын
Those tankers were something. They had a lot of guts to go through that nightmare like that. A lot of guts.
@leafyradio69343 жыл бұрын
I’ve never seen this episode. This is one of the first shows I ever remember watching, this and WW2 In Colour when I was probably 7-8
@FuzzyMarineVet3 жыл бұрын
My stepfather was a plank-holder in the 6th Marine Tank Battalion and fought on Okinawa. He was instrumental in the breakout of Cpl. Day's squad on Sugarloaf Hill.
@apparatchiktgru84813 жыл бұрын
I've read profusely about this theatre of war.But seeing it is enchanting.
@mikearmstrong84833 жыл бұрын
I'm astonished that the M3 tank was even mentioned. Most people seem to think that the Sherman was the only US tank in the war. In fact, almost 23,000 M3/M5 Stuart tanks were produced, and saw considerable service in the 1st half of the Pacific fighting and in Normandy and North Africa.
@brianjungen40593 жыл бұрын
It was mentioned. They said that the gun was too small to assist with destroying bunkers.
@joshjosephson50743 жыл бұрын
But they did have to title “Satan” when it was a flamethrower so I wouldn’t be complaining
@leebh86073 жыл бұрын
Sherman: Tiger of the Pacific sounds like a good title for book/documentry on US Shermans in the Pacific Theatre.
@charlie63483 жыл бұрын
Is a Bad documentary but if You read real reports and better documentals of the tanks of this period You Will understand how good was the sherman and how actually useless the tiger and tiger II were
@artempapirovyy87733 жыл бұрын
@@charlie6348 the tiger and tiger 3 were very expensive amd took a long time to make, and broke down a lot. But their sole purpose was to fight the t-34s on the eastern front.
@charlie63483 жыл бұрын
@@artempapirovyy8773 that's true but another interesthing thing is that the most successful German tank was the stug, there is a lot myths about the WW2 tanks in general, for example the T34 it wasn't the Best Even got troubles with comunications and the air system, deadly weak points
@artempapirovyy87733 жыл бұрын
@@charlie6348 tru, the t-34 was rushed and wasnt completed all the way, but the germans were scared of them since the panzers they had before could not take them out.
@aaronstevenson92703 жыл бұрын
@@artempapirovyy8773 no they had 50-1 t34s Vs panzers
@timeisapathwalkingtounderstand2 жыл бұрын
👍Thank you for the video and to all the men and women who serve thank you for your service. And rest in peace everybody who died over senseless war 🙏.
@Ace-rp7vr10 ай бұрын
It’s cool to see an episode of greatest rank battles I’ve never actually got to see before
@capitainsheep11373 жыл бұрын
Love That documentary Channel so much
@Wolfdancer48593 жыл бұрын
Greatest tank battles has a season 3?? What! This is awesome!!
@themightywookie351c33 жыл бұрын
I’m a retired sailor and I have never understood why our cruisers and other ships did not get closer (not too close) for more accurate shots on the Japanese defenses; of course without grounding them.
@AlexHalt1003 жыл бұрын
You`re easier to hit. a cruiser is harder to replace than a LCVP full of Grunts
@franeasanovic27612 жыл бұрын
Long range japanese heavy howitzers would have been able to reach them with their artillery fire, that's why
@gabrielboudreau67013 жыл бұрын
Small but useful roll? I beg to differ. The played a huge critical role because the Japanese are hidden in gopher holes. Its how I see it. Greatest Tank Battles was a series that I absolutely loved. I'm sure I've seen every single episodes. Wishing there was more back stories and side stories. For a historical documentary, this one is certainly on top of my ranking. I just hate it when other people takes it to repost online under a different title.
@mattheww.78253 жыл бұрын
Japanese Commander: It would take a million men a thousand years to break the fortress. United States Marine Corps: Hold my beer…..
@wifi_soldier50763 жыл бұрын
Imagine how the Japanese felt when they had to fight Soviet t34/85 and IS-2 heavy tanks in 1945. The is-2 had a 122mm gun and 120mm of sloped armour.
@chinaho-gmks Жыл бұрын
Tanks are useless without landing.
@hmzdu4 ай бұрын
Great episode 😊
@FactNinja3 жыл бұрын
God bless these American heroes 🙏🏻🇺🇸
@riptidegaming88763 жыл бұрын
Australians made up a 3rd of the force in the pacific
@jaydoneash2098 Жыл бұрын
@@riptidegaming8876really?
@larrylaurenzi16253 жыл бұрын
These American tankers got to know what is was like to be a German Tiger Tanker facing Sherman tanks, since their Sherman’s so out armored and outgunned all Japanese tanks. Proving the quality of a tank is completely relative to the quality of opposing armor. Can someone give a break to the Sherman in Europe considering that Allied tank combat philosophy created the gigantic mismatch in Europe.
@supersasquatch3 жыл бұрын
It was an extremely effective anti infantry tank in Europe
@pappap17023 жыл бұрын
Europe was quantity over quality by the planners. They knew it took 5 Sherman's to take out 1 Tiger and were willing to play those odds. Sad but true.
@louisavondart91783 жыл бұрын
The Sherman was a medium tank, not a heavy hitter like the Tiger or Panther. It's design fitted perfectly with the infantry support role but the later Firefly and Pershing tanks were very effective against the German armour. There was nothing cynical in the planning as is suggested by many. The disavantages suffered by Sherman crews were, in the end outweighed by German armour breakdowns and fuel shortages, not to mention the overwhelming air support the Allies had.
@pappap17023 жыл бұрын
@@louisavondart9178 The first tanks in the Pacific were M3 Sherman's a light tank with only a 37mm main gun. The M4 medium came later
@TR33ZY_CRTM3 жыл бұрын
@@pappap1702 "M3 Sherman's" Did you mean the M3 Stuart or the M3 Lee?
@BigLuke19803 жыл бұрын
HA-GO is to Sherman as Sherman is to Tiger.
@paulredinger4203 жыл бұрын
The Japanese tanks were worse then that. More like a M5 to a tiger is a better comparison. .30 caliber machine gun bullets could penetrate the HA-GO tanks. They're more like a tankette almost like an full armoured Bren carrier.
@porsche-sandoesnotundersta81843 жыл бұрын
But remember the biggest difference is the numbers. Which is basicaly germany against the hordes of American and Russian M4s and T34s.
@zulubeatz13 жыл бұрын
WW2 vets are just outstanding. What a generation of people. A million men in a thousand years - we have The USMC and that will have to do it. They did it.
@photoisca73863 жыл бұрын
I think this episode must have slipped into "Greatest Tank Battles" by mistake. It should have been "Great Turkey Shoots". It must have been the equivalent of a Kamikaze mission.
@shawntepitts4883 жыл бұрын
Perfect
@ronaldmccarty97713 жыл бұрын
holy commercials Batman!
@johnrettig18803 жыл бұрын
My Dad was in the Marines in WW 2 . He once told me that there was Nothing Wrong with the Japanese Tanks ...... They Blew Up Just Fine . He was telling me about a battle of tanks Stuart V. Two Japanese Medium tanks . Spoilers Stuart's Won They just said that he Stuart didn't have the fire power . BS Which way were you looking . The Japanese didn't put much effort into armor and that's the same not only for their plains but ALSO their tanks . I got the opportunity to not only see but got into a Japanese tank years ago at Camp San Luis Obispo . NOT very thick armor at ALL .
@Asymmetrical-Saggin2 жыл бұрын
Cuz they would rather just fly a plane into you and kill themselves
@guywiththeweirdmustasche56223 жыл бұрын
I bet bale was super angry at his gunner coz he almost got them killed lol
@stephenjennings73033 жыл бұрын
Sherman tank in the pacific: huh well i guess im top teir in the lobby again
@jacksonwilson88683 жыл бұрын
What is this, bf5?
@voltsx46643 жыл бұрын
@@jacksonwilson8868 nah I think hes talking about war thunder
@funfactor45283 жыл бұрын
@@jacksonwilson8868 definitely warthunder man
@paulemica47183 жыл бұрын
Sherman in Europe : 🤕
@stephenjennings73033 жыл бұрын
@@paulemica4718 the battle of arrecourt would like a word with u
@robertpayne27173 жыл бұрын
When i was in high school someone mentioned the superiority of German Engineering, i Comment out loud that yes it was great they lost two major wars this century. I graduated in 1975
@nickg43873 жыл бұрын
yo this looks good and how come we never got this movie I mean it's looks awesome to have another tank movie like fury
@gunmasterx11643 жыл бұрын
Documentary buddy
@nathanieloconnor66863 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣 they should do this more often be like game almost love the video's though
@Vryx433 жыл бұрын
gonna play warthunder after this
@louisavondart91783 жыл бұрын
Midway was a very important battle for the USA. But it didn't stop the Japanese advance. That was done by the Australian Army in Papua New Guinea. It was the first time that the Japanese suffered a major defeat on land and it shocked the heck out of them. ( Battles of Milne Bay and Wau ) But, it's never mentioned because Dougout Doug claimed all the credit. Newsreels backed him up even though no US troops took part in the battle. Tarawa was so costly because the poor Marines had to wade so far from the beach. Poor reconnaisance meant that the Amtracks ran into coral formations and couldn't get onto the beach itself in the initial assault. One Engineer unit did recognise this danger before the battle and tried to use remote controlled demolition boats to blow holes in the coral but were given worn out, leaky boats for the task and they all broke down or sank. Later amphibious attacks were better planned using better Amtraks and beach recon parties from submarines.
@thelonebanana60253 жыл бұрын
You wanna add how many times the japanese attacked any other island after the battle of Midway?
@TheBruceGday3 жыл бұрын
They (Japan) attacked Papua-New Guinea prior to Midway, but the Battle of Milne Bay was the farthest east on New Guinea and happened after Midway. The turning of the Pacific was a combination of Midway, Milne Bay, Kokoda Trail/Buna, and Guadalcanal. The battles on Guadalcanal and in the skies and on the sea around it were really the pivot point. Midway stripped away aircraft carriers. Milne Bay stopped the advance to cut off Australia. (Yes, MacArthur was bombastic and did nothing to help with Milne Bay). The Marines and Army under Nimitz were were much more effective.) Guadalcanal chewed up Japanese troops, planes and pilots, and ships and spit them out. Guadalcanal broke the back of Japan such that they were always on the defensive.
@gimpycanuck22 жыл бұрын
Australia got the short end of the stick when it came to receiving credit, and your right that was all MacArthur. One of his favorite tactics was to refer to an American unit as an American unit. When it was Australians winning and standing ground it became an "Allied" victory with no credit to the Australians.
@robzillopez8 ай бұрын
Thank you Mr Paul!!!!!! I wish you could be president seriously we're in trouble and I don't see a way out????? I wish we could vote on where OUR MONEY GOES!!!!!!!! BUT IT'S GOIN INTO THE SEWER. SADLY THE SWAMP IS FULL AS WELL AS THE SEWER!!!!!!
@billotto6023 жыл бұрын
I wish documentaries would get this right. The island they invaded was Betio. The atoll was Tarawa. And look it up on global earth - it is wall to wall houses from shore to shore ! Wow. So much for a south Pacific paradise ! LOL 😆
@roivincentdulay68383 жыл бұрын
37mm gun vs Sherman Tanks 😂
@kevlarburrito66933 жыл бұрын
It wasn't just the Marines tasked with all that...in fact the Marines didn't even make up the majority of units. In many of the major battles fought in the Pacific, US Army combat units outnumbered Marine units several times over...
@burstingwizard9753 жыл бұрын
True but the marines are typically the tip of the spear. Usually they go in first
@NobleKorhedron3 жыл бұрын
This gives a false impression - the USN and USMC also had aircraft by the dozen. Dive bombers, torpedo bombers, fighters, and fighter-bombers...
@jimparis50732 жыл бұрын
Yes they did and it may give a different impression but it’s a video specifically about tanks in the pacific
@MrDlt1233 жыл бұрын
So basically, the Sherman’s were to the Japanese tanks what the German Panzers and Tigers were to the Shermans in Europe.
@DavidFMayerPhD3 жыл бұрын
Japan had no use for the heavy tanks such as were used in Europe. Island warfare simply cannot justify such heavy hardware.
@freshbanana99483 жыл бұрын
And they just couldn’t make heavy tanks
@freshbanana99483 жыл бұрын
Because they didnt had enough materials to built heavy tanks
@viking87813 жыл бұрын
The suicidal frontal attacks were the biggest waste of men and equipment by any country. Its hard to understand their mindset
@thecobra11433 жыл бұрын
Strike fear into the enemy… that’s what they tried t,o do…
@robertpayne27173 жыл бұрын
Had an Uncle that lost his truck and a 155 howitzer at Tarawa, all his equipment and personal items due the time of the landing they tried to land at low tide... US Navy and Marine Corp learned how not to take an island!!!!
@jammer65243 жыл бұрын
Anyone else seeing scam ads for the FuzeBug Mosquitoes killing bug zapper?
@cb76003 жыл бұрын
*sees a Sherman fly from a artillery shell* well there's a flying tank
@paulredinger4203 жыл бұрын
I can't get over how long the marine's pig stickers are compared to how long they were when I did my training at Ft. Benning Ga. wow! They could stick 3 people at one time in 1944! Ours wouldn't of went through one person in 1982! Anyone know why they were so long back then?
@burstingwizard9753 жыл бұрын
Maybe because the brass back then thought the extra reach would be significant? It could also have something to do with the weight of the weapons. The Garand was much heavier than the M16 so maybe a longer & heavier bayonet would've been poorly balanced on a lighter rifle. I'm probably talkin' out my ass though
@larrylaurenzi16253 жыл бұрын
Sherman’s vs Light Japanese tanks was equal to Sherman’s vs Tiger Tanks, it will always be the courage of the Tank Crew that always makes the difference.
@NewbieObi3 жыл бұрын
its more light M3 stuart going against a tiger.
@bobbybates26143 жыл бұрын
The lea grant tank was used in Burma
@Rammstein0963.3 жыл бұрын
It's just Lee bro, Grant was what the Brits called the ones we sent them.
@The-Dom3 жыл бұрын
They didnt suicide out of fear, they suicided out of shame.
@TheBruceGday3 жыл бұрын
Peleliu was a pretty lousy fight. Tanks played an important role there as well.
@paulredinger4203 жыл бұрын
They couldn't get up into the ridges and cave systems where they were most drastically needed. The infantry couldn't dig in after making advances and had to withdrawal to get away from the shrapnel from mortars and artillery that was tearing the units apart. This was solved by the troops carrying sandbags with them to be protected from the shrapnel. Read the unit history reports of the battle. Really cuts to the point, and it's the best authority on the battle.
@kimzgwapo7657 Жыл бұрын
Shermans in the Pacific is like Tiger in Europe 😂
@catlee80643 жыл бұрын
Yo uguys do know there was only 6 div of marines in the pacific? 20 Army?
@masonmr23 жыл бұрын
If you want some we will do it again……….do you want to see the sum……🤫
@charlesgstudios55452 жыл бұрын
Greatest Tank Battles (Season 3/Episode 6) Tank Battles of the Pacific
@DavidFMayerPhD3 жыл бұрын
Okinawa was positively the WORST battle for USA in terms of casualties in its entire history.
@norshstephens23953 жыл бұрын
As far as casualties? You’re wrong, it was the Battle of The Bulge by far. With over 22 thousand killed. But Okinawa was the worse when it comes to casualties during the Pacific War. Especially for the Navy witch took the most casualties, followed by the Army then the Marines.
@DavidFMayerPhD3 жыл бұрын
@@norshstephens2395 You are CORRECT. Thanks for the information.
@splendadaddy29333 жыл бұрын
@@DavidFMayerPhD you realize 50,000 Americans died at Gettysburg over a period of 3 days right? Okinawa might have been our most costly battle in the pacific theater of ww2 but nowhere near our bloodiest event In history as a whole.
@DavidFMayerPhD3 жыл бұрын
@@splendadaddy2933 Thanks for the info.
@jimsworthow5313 жыл бұрын
my gramps told me because of the japanese soldier diet of fish and rice, the decomposition smell was of rotting fish and human putrid odor.
@gus26003 жыл бұрын
They still sink ! the U.S. should have put poison gas down in those caves !
@sWeeTcholo3 жыл бұрын
How did Japan took over if its a small island
@RJFPme3 жыл бұрын
Those tanks have men in them ? They speak of the object without acknowledging the soldiers inside.
@kwhufc57693 жыл бұрын
The Sherman tank always made me laugh as Sherman just makes me think German
@jjayyoung73353 жыл бұрын
Why didn't the tank blow up the seawall blow a hole through it
@mattdarchuck40573 жыл бұрын
Good question...My guess is that they were thicker in real life than what the video displays.
@pappap17023 жыл бұрын
They might have been to close before they realized how thick they were or couldn't depress their main gun low enough at close range.
@louisavondart91783 жыл бұрын
they were up to 20 feet thick made of two lines of palm tree supports filled with sand and concrete. Even a 16" gun would have had trouble...
@conniehooks46473 жыл бұрын
95000 angels 😇 💖
@TheKep3 жыл бұрын
4:54 buddy #2 off the ramp ate shit lmao
@yourlocalalexis45783 жыл бұрын
we should have bypassed all the islands, and head straight to Japan, since we dropped the bomb anyway!
@rednek6663 жыл бұрын
Some of them had to be captured so planes can reach mainland Japan and bomb it. It`s also not a good idea leaving pockets of resistance in your rear.
@user-uy1rg8td1v3 жыл бұрын
@@rednek666 Could have bombed Japan from bases on the Islands off of Alaska. I believe the real reason was to free the Americans captured during the fighting in the Philippines.
@rednek6663 жыл бұрын
@@user-uy1rg8td1v Nobody would use the whole army resourses just to free some prisoners, that`s definitely not the case. There were no airfields on alaskan islands that could reach targets on mainland Japan.
@darrelllovett47223 жыл бұрын
@@rednek666 At the time the island hopping campaign started; the Atomic Bomb was just theory. The B 29 was still a prototype; and the Japanese still had a very large carrier force.
@rednek6663 жыл бұрын
@@darrelllovett4722 I`m not the one you have to adress this to
@Khalifrio11 ай бұрын
The words Heavy Armor and Japanese WW2 Tanks do not go together.
@culturalliberator94253 жыл бұрын
3:00 Oh, that's funny. They must have never met an American before. Invite Tojo over for dinner some time and I'll show him one. 7:17 Oh really? How about a thousand Americans and only one.
@2serveand2protect3 жыл бұрын
For God's Sakes ! - I absolutely HATE "Hero Wars" and sure as hell I will never play it!
@janicebass53543 жыл бұрын
why didnt you strave them out they werent going anywhere
@nickhefter10753 жыл бұрын
For the same reason we didn’t starve out Japan at the end. It would take way to long to do
@davidalexoff16583 жыл бұрын
Life in a tank was not very pleasant, at all.
@kaptainkaos12023 жыл бұрын
And now the USMC have gotten rid of their tanks. Stupid decision.
@TheKep3 жыл бұрын
They still have LAV’s which would serve the same purpose in an amphibious landing. The advent of precision munitions and armed drones have made the tank obsolete for amphibious landings.
@jaydoneash20982 жыл бұрын
King tiger vs a Ha Go…..
@kevwebb2637 Жыл бұрын
It's sad that the Marines also had to take some Children away from their parent in order to save them. That is sad that the Civilians were brainwashed by their own government and even the soldiers had a rough time in the field. That didn't help the people of Japan to be able to Distinguish the difference between Religion and Cults.
@ray-02493 жыл бұрын
BANZAI!!!
@yewenyi3 жыл бұрын
But the Japanese lost the battle of Milne bay before midway.
@gus26003 жыл бұрын
With the inept tactics and ineffective training of the American Marines it is a miracle that won any battle in the pacific !
@anibalcesarnishizk22053 жыл бұрын
In what sense inept?.
@jimparis50732 жыл бұрын
@@anibalcesarnishizk2205 terrain, I’d say the marines did as good as they could but terrain was a big issue for em n they weren’t fully ready it. Saying that neither would I so good on those brave men
@เจตน์ศักดิ์ทองเจริญ3 жыл бұрын
Sherman is โลงเหล็กต้ดปืนใหญ่ชนะเพราะจำนวน!
@toaster8389 Жыл бұрын
Clueless
@niccologentile8673 жыл бұрын
Oh yeh, they're definitely was a Tiger E on Gaudalcanal. The god damn Germans just UFO'd a Tiger to Gaudalcanal. The legend still says if you hang around Gaudalcanal today, the Dude from Ancient Aliens will tell the full story of how Chesty Puller singlehandedly destroyed the German Tiger in the middle of the Pacific Ocean with only a obsidian pickaxe
@chrismcleod97483 жыл бұрын
With some small assistance from the Bob Semple tank.
@janderson58913 жыл бұрын
Ads worse than when it was on cable
@davidalexander83053 жыл бұрын
🧙♂️☕♥️🙏🇺🇲🦅🇺🇲👍👍
@gus26003 жыл бұрын
The Sherman was a joke to the Germans . As an American, I am ashamed to say that it was an American tank .
@freedomefighterbrony90533 жыл бұрын
The sherman wasn't built to take German armor head on it was designed for infantry support and even then Sherman's in Europe rarely ran into German big cats
@peterson70823 жыл бұрын
@@freedomefighterbrony9053 A bit mistaken on your end too, U.S. armor doctrinally would engage enemy armor. Regardless. The performance varied
@peterson70823 жыл бұрын
Nonsense
@TheKep3 жыл бұрын
@@peterson7082 Nonsense. The US tank doctrine was “Infantry Support” not tank hunting. There were special tank hunter units using the M10 , M18 Hellcat, and later the M36 Jackson.
@TheKep3 жыл бұрын
Gus why are you ashamed to say the Sherman was American? It quite literally won the war. Without the Sherman there is not VE Day.
@janicebass53543 жыл бұрын
why did you napam the island
@unitedwestand51003 жыл бұрын
Japanese tanks were a joke. They were cardboard boxes with pee shooters mounted on them. Heavy Armor? LMAO
@dylanhaugen37393 жыл бұрын
Against Chinese infantry with no real armor support, they were really effective, against well trained and supplied marines with the latest tanks of the time, they were hopelessly outmatched. But when your a solider your expected to make do with what you have. Even if what you have might as well be considered garbage.
@unitedwestand51003 жыл бұрын
@@dylanhaugen3739 ,. I agree!
@mikearmstrong84833 жыл бұрын
When you are an infantryman whose armored protection consists of a GI issue t-shirt and uniform blouse, a motorcycle with a mounted Bren gun and a piece of sheet tin screwed on the front becomes heavy armor. Anything that moves under its own power, has a machine gun, and your rifle bullets bounce off of it, is heavy armor. Until your own tanks show up, but in the Pacific (especially early on) Allied tanks were few and far between compared to infantry. And the Japanese did develop a self-propelled gun with a high velocity 75mm gun to take out Shermans, but its production was too limited to see significant service. There were some in the Philippines but I don't recall that they actually engaged US tanks.
@ivantheteribul3 жыл бұрын
@@mikearmstrong8483 The Japanese also had blueprints for the Tiger, but that, and any heavier tank designs they had, were likely reserved for the Home Islands.
@stickyb95993 жыл бұрын
The amount of commercials is completely ridiculous and ruins trying to watch the video every 30 seconds it seems there's another one
@HyPnOsS1933 Жыл бұрын
Meanwhile Russia en Germany Stalingrad Germany 500.000 Soviet plus minus 1miljion
@formulah1133 жыл бұрын
thats messed up, showing a kid 🏃♂️ and flopping in the water, to then show war footage off bodies floating in the water.
@Blackhawkhelicopter83933 жыл бұрын
That is war
@michaelbrennan12943 жыл бұрын
T34 ,panthers,sherman ,junk a real tank type97 the best tank ever ever made
@chrismcleod97483 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry to inform you, the Bob Semple tank holds the title of best tank ever made.
@michaelbrennan12943 жыл бұрын
@@chrismcleod9748 chris it was a joke ,thats a tin can on wheels type 97 ,but seriously 🐆 leopard 🇩🇪 germany,🇷🇺 Russia T90 ,Israel tanks ,South korea 🇰🇷 my opinion is the best tank overall .GERMANY MAKES SOME OF THE BEST WAR equipment STG DURING WW2,GERMANY 🇩🇪 ALSO makes best assault rifle G-36,I only know the nickname of this tank destroyer the RHINO WITH THE FLAK 88 ON TRACKS ,THAT COMMENT WAS MAKE PEOPLE LAUGH. ATLEAST U DIDN'T SAY I WAS STUPID🤣🤣🤣👍⚡⚡🔥
@jingranwan46082 жыл бұрын
I cant hear !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@jingranwan46082 жыл бұрын
lol
@bobkwan13083 жыл бұрын
too much talking
@minoghirardosi94633 жыл бұрын
"
@janicebass53543 жыл бұрын
thats did not no what what you were doing you cost a lot of anercian nen
@thomaslinton57653 жыл бұрын
The battlefields were "as wide as the ocean." ? Very dramatic and, speaking of tank combat in the Pacific, absurdly false.
@Lakeside43 жыл бұрын
A tiger tank is German? So not such a good title for a USA documentary on Sherman tanks in the Pacific.
@mikeobholz31483 жыл бұрын
The victorious rainbow extraorally sparkle because search summarily drip atop a spectacular melody. young, lively sun