More recent video - full 2019 display by Czech Gripen • Dazzling Gripen - full... All-action display by the Swedish Air Force Mach 2 SAAB at Fairford. See the canards (small 'wings' near the nose) tilt during manoeuvres.
Пікірлер: 372
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
More recent video - full 2019 display by Czech Gripen kzbin.info/www/bejne/n2m4gaufmreNptU
@hd_jusonvlog69775 жыл бұрын
What kind of camera did you used to film the gripen? ? ? its very impressive
@keithallver24505 жыл бұрын
Draken, Viggen, and now the Gripen...The Swedes sure know how to make badass jet fighters.
@TheMack5 жыл бұрын
Faboulous camera work!! This is how an airshow should be filmed, so smooth! The pilot really shows how graceful this fighter can be and with stellar performance.
@MrBillyBrands6 жыл бұрын
Stunning camera work, the best capture of a fast jet I have ever seen!
@Gripenace4 жыл бұрын
The quality of this filming is absolutely top off the top!!
@TilleTeamM6 жыл бұрын
Outstanding camera work! I have NEVER seen steadier shots on airplanes!
@tomryner58305 жыл бұрын
My goodness it's beautiful! And the E version also comes as a carrier lander. Short take off and landing. Perfect for Canada, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany etc
@ragnarzetterberg90325 жыл бұрын
Simply amaxing!
@christianm15335 жыл бұрын
You almost never ever see a Gripen delaminate airflow over the wings. It just turns and carries energy beautifully around the turn. It just carves air so gracefully. So what if it is slightly low on power. It compensates with low drag and rock solid aerodynamics.
@catarinaandersson42155 жыл бұрын
SAAB know a thing or two.......
@tingsater5 жыл бұрын
You are as skilled at shooting with your camera, as the pilot is at operating his fighter jet. Poetry in motion, times two!
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
:)!
@237KMT6 жыл бұрын
Epic camera work.
@christianm15336 жыл бұрын
I love how laminar the flow is on this fighter. The Gripen almost never looses airflow over a wing (condensation, due to underpressure boiling point). Positive lift canard and carves air so beautifully. It really maximizes energy transformations.
@Thor23436 жыл бұрын
Fantastic airplane - Fantastic camera work
@thomasakerberg67656 жыл бұрын
I completely comply!
@zoltanbanoczki76916 жыл бұрын
perfect, smooth camera positioning and of course hard dancing Gripen
@petter57215 жыл бұрын
GRIPEN IS BY FAR THE BEST VALUE FOR MONEY!
@riskinhos5 жыл бұрын
how do you calculate that?
@petter57215 жыл бұрын
Based on LIFE CYCLE COST figures among modern fighters and Gripen is app. 50% cheaper to operate than the F35, for example!
@einar80194 жыл бұрын
@@petter5721 no more that that gripen is 4k per flight hour whilst f35 is nearly 30k
@samkusuma93775 жыл бұрын
Great performance of Gripen and its Pilot
@dcsvalkyrie84386 жыл бұрын
Award for best thumbnail on all of KZbin!
@flugsnug6 жыл бұрын
Thank you - that's an unusual comment!
@neutrino686 жыл бұрын
The resolution and clarity of this video is just awesome. Wish I had more than one thumbs up to give.
@Chris_Love6 жыл бұрын
Top notch filming! What a show for this amazing fighter
@hulado4 жыл бұрын
beautiful camera work Flugsnug. thanks. when he pulls hard port after the first loop it startled me to see how fast it could be done.
@nishellesly29196 жыл бұрын
Your camera work is spectacular!! Well done mate☺️👍
@skargardsdoktorn61376 жыл бұрын
High-class filming, really great resolution. Thumbs up!
@MichaelHeinrich16 жыл бұрын
Awesome display, awesome camera work. Chapeau!
@superswedes015 жыл бұрын
Love your skill with the camera!!!! AMAZING!!!
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
thank you - will be uploading this year RIAT Gripen very soon :)
@rapidcabin6 жыл бұрын
Smooth , clear video. Flugsnug you are good at this. thanks for the video
@nbrod3n5165 жыл бұрын
A lot of people complimenting the aircraft, I'm here to compliment your filming. Absolutely amazing! How do you track is so smoothly? It's like watching a computer simulation.
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
practice and suitable kit
@Sunedosa6 жыл бұрын
That is such a beautiful aircraft.
@troyhudson28255 жыл бұрын
Hey Canada. This is it!
@danczer16 жыл бұрын
It's so smooth! Sometime I think that it's a video game. Especially when it's comes forward.
@newbiesobnixus88816 жыл бұрын
Ladislav Tánczos :Ohh. Same as me.like a game.lol.
@tjwookie6 жыл бұрын
stunning display.
@TravisTLK6 жыл бұрын
Smooth and Precise! Piloting and camera work, both!
@jannicatjarnlund77285 жыл бұрын
It´s an aerodynamic masterpiece. Almost every plane you see doing those turns in that speed gets turbulence over the wings. That rarely ever happens with JAS Gripen.
@tomryner58305 жыл бұрын
Even the Viggen was ahead of its time. The Viggen entered service in 1971. The year I was born Viggen is still one of the most powerful fighters when it comes to speed. Mach 3 in short duration. Missile lock on an SR 71 is pretty powerful... Sweden had a population of roughly 5 million at the time
@christianm15335 жыл бұрын
No. There is no way a Viggen does mach 3. It barely breaks mach 2. Zoom-climbing in trajectory and missile locking an SR-71 is not the same as doing mach 3 and trying to play catch up. There is no real fighter that does mach 3. Not F-22, F-15 etc. MIG-31 is an interceptor capable of near mach-3 speeds.
@tomryner58305 жыл бұрын
@@christianm1533 I'm so sorry. I didn't mean Mach 3. What I meant to say was close roughly 3K kph. From speaking to an old Viggen pilot Mach 2.4 (close to 2.900kph) wasn't a problem other than fuel consumption and a buckled rear from extensive use of the afterburner. Sorry.
@christianm15335 жыл бұрын
Well. Still exceeding top speed according to my knowledge. But still a more believable number. I guess, coming from an old pilot, I'd have to take your word for it. Lighting it up in a slight dive from extremely high up until bingo fuel might reach those kind of speeds. Planar flight @ 35000ft is about mach 2.1. Maybe mach 2.2.
@jannicatjarnlund77285 жыл бұрын
Only thing with Viggen was that it was so dam loud. In this video it sets off the car alarms when taking off...=P kzbin.info/www/bejne/f3ypfpmspZ51jKs
@catarinaandersson42155 жыл бұрын
The Eurofighter is an aerodynamic disaster compared to 39 Gripen!
@737driver6 жыл бұрын
Great to see those vortices, you can see clearly when there’s a lot of lift involved.
@tolvana5 жыл бұрын
Very impressive indeed. And I liked the bird song too. Greetings from Tampere, Finland.
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
Greetings and thanks
@alanjs16 жыл бұрын
Superb footage as usual. Well done.
@Aviatorspot5 жыл бұрын
Awesome flying display video
@tolvana5 жыл бұрын
To be honest, I really wish this would be Finlands next choise. Really good value for little money. And on top of that, it would be from good old friends. Actually. I see no reasons why to not purchase this aircraft.
@JorgenPersson-jo4sc5 жыл бұрын
Well USA will push F35 or "new" F16V down your throuth...
@tolvana5 жыл бұрын
@@JorgenPersson-jo4sc YES WE KNOW
@perrajonsson66965 жыл бұрын
We asked us the same question last time Finland purchased a new fighter aircraft, Gripen vs Hornet 0-1...:-(
@richw01236 жыл бұрын
Nice! I have never seen RIAT from outside the airfield but having seen this, I realize just how intrusive and distracting the PA system and commentary is. It so nice just hearing the engine and nothing else
@nonsense02336 жыл бұрын
that camera work is amazing
@JohnJohansen26 жыл бұрын
1:04 Especially this bit I had to watch again, and again, and again!
@skogling6 жыл бұрын
9G in a split second. Feel free to see my pictures at Instagram as "flygopaten" 😉
@georgevavoulis47582 жыл бұрын
Beautiful jet ,lovely sound too .
@thebrummierailenthusiasts53296 жыл бұрын
very smooth sound indeed the way its gliding
@catarinaandersson42156 жыл бұрын
Fantastic camera work.....
@ylleskog6 жыл бұрын
Mmm, look how the stabilizers works at the close ups. Great filming!
@semuapenuh5 жыл бұрын
Beautiful air ballet.
@pachecopacheco90786 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful aircraft.
@anmordal-swe22035 жыл бұрын
Amazing photo, better than any youtube videos on JAS I've seen. Thanks for sharing!
@mr.jaguar38285 жыл бұрын
fenomenal show
@miskuamas5 жыл бұрын
Wow!! Im in love with gripen!
@victormanuelpolanco9226 жыл бұрын
Great vid!!!!. So elegant a fighter jet!!!!.
@sinnes5 жыл бұрын
beautiful fighter
@erikfranguellifeletantonio8915 жыл бұрын
The Gripen NG is the best multi-function fighter of the current 4.5++ generation, only loses in some configurations for its competitors
@jemimallah25915 жыл бұрын
its also incredibly cheap.
@christianm15335 жыл бұрын
@@jemimallah2591: Cheap is a very relative term when talking fighter systems in general. Cost effectiveness is a more appropriate term I think. The amount of sorties and missions you can fly on the same cash significantly alters capacity. Not all mission even remotely require bleeding edge capacity. Most missions are mundane patrol & surveillance. The capacity to cost-effectively patrol borders is a very significant capability.
@einar80194 жыл бұрын
@@christianm1533 the gripen costs about the same to buy but is much cheaper to maintain and fly and requires a smaller crew that can load it up faster
@FredrikElgstrand6 жыл бұрын
Awsome video.
@MalteSpieltYT5 жыл бұрын
i dont think many appreciate how good your camera work was here :D its so hard to film a plane, let alone a fighter jet!
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
thanks for you appreciation!
@ramalhoforttes20595 жыл бұрын
Verdadeiro show!!! Em breve fazeram parte da força aérea do 🇧🇷
@michaeldailey71035 жыл бұрын
Beautiful plane !!!!!
@petter57215 жыл бұрын
This Aircraft is insane, a very smart system!
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
very!
@ducktape59706 жыл бұрын
Great as usual
@shohanurrahman14215 жыл бұрын
Hottest fighter i have ever seen
@bartvandenhaute40196 жыл бұрын
Just the looks would make me buy it...
@talalbhatti99314 жыл бұрын
Gripen & JF-17 are both my favourite fighter Jets....
@brunoescobar2665 жыл бұрын
Sensacional! Manobras mto parecidas com o SU-35. Excelente aquisição da FAB!
@PROV-g2g5 жыл бұрын
Is our!
@Thetequilashooter15 жыл бұрын
Beautiful aircraft. It’s roll rates are amazing. In defense cost terms, this plane is a bang for the buck. I am surprised that it doesn’t get more sales.
@michaelkarnerfors95455 жыл бұрын
It is because it is built for specs and requirements by the Swedish Air Force, which is different from most countries. Sweden has a habit of doing things their own way.
@christianm15335 жыл бұрын
Political pressure. Military equipment is a dirty, dirty game. The biggest boys peddle their shit, not because it is the best but because they bully every one else. Schoolyard politics in a sense.
@christianm15335 жыл бұрын
Not really. The Gripen is fully NATO compatible and carries the highest load variation of any fighter jet. It means that it is highly adaptable.
@KimJakab5 жыл бұрын
Sweden has political restrictions and can't sell to whatever country they want. Since all other countries which are exporting defense systems are way more corrupt and therefor it's much easier for them to sell.
@catarinaandersson42155 жыл бұрын
Politics.....
@adamliljebrunn93616 жыл бұрын
Heart melting❤️
@2.Cuzzzz4 жыл бұрын
Draken and viggen are my favorites
@dprietovial6 жыл бұрын
Extraordinario
@ananarkomvichitchai6365 жыл бұрын
" .. WOW .. " Griqen ..😍👍👍👍
@skogling6 жыл бұрын
Nice video! I shared it to the pilot.
@flugsnug6 жыл бұрын
Hope he enjoys it nearly as much as the actual display!
@skogling6 жыл бұрын
flugsnug How did you film it? I think Henrik has asked you in an e-mail too.
@teaaet15 жыл бұрын
This is a super nibble plane. So flawless in maneuvering.
@randyx3166 жыл бұрын
Canada should buy some now to replace our old cf-18
@lego4736 жыл бұрын
I think they're buying the F-18E
@Tomcat58375 жыл бұрын
The Gripen is in the competition for the CF-18 replacement, along with the Eurofighter, F-18E, and F-35. Dassault has removed the Rafale from the competition.
@watermirror3 жыл бұрын
Gripen CD, upgraded w/ AESA, Arexis EW suite, IRST like the EF version, additional hardpoint... a mini EF-like Gripen, could be the best interceptor plane at low cost
@ericalexandre32696 жыл бұрын
Good Plane and good fighter and Mach 2 him
@Adhenauer5 жыл бұрын
GRIPEN JAZ 39 NG . MADE IN BRAZIL FOR EMBRAER
@tokuchaan46936 жыл бұрын
Absolutely love your camera work (and may be post edditing?). Delightful to watch!
@carsos006 жыл бұрын
Completely agree, always a delight to see Flugsng post's, I have no doubt that behind the lens there is some very expensive equipment but more importantly in this case it's used by someone who knows what they are doing resulting in what must be some of the best quality aircraft vidoe's on youtube.
@ReverseThrustAviation6 жыл бұрын
True words!
@safetyinstructor6 жыл бұрын
Who else likes Saab Gripen too?
@ESPirits876 жыл бұрын
Gripen*
@safetyinstructor6 жыл бұрын
ESP87 changed it..... sorry for my autocorrection
@viniciusx6005 жыл бұрын
Esse cara tem a melhor câmera do mundo
@peterbergqvist76666 жыл бұрын
A superplane that strikes those fussed other planes agility
@vilmondesribeiro43636 жыл бұрын
É bem bonito mesmo Brazil (my country) bougth 20 these Gripens, these are realy beaultifull airplanes to see
@felicioharley6 жыл бұрын
The video is so stable that looks like computer-generated imagery! Nice work @flugsnug! OIS + EIS?
@XSpotAviation6 жыл бұрын
Amazing stuff! Liked! I wonder how you can follow the plane so smooth without any shaking... !?
@metralla5 жыл бұрын
apparently it's called a tripod, it's a new technology
@rafaelcaiani31005 жыл бұрын
Gripen 👍👍👍👏👏👏💪💪💪
@Balacypax6 жыл бұрын
Show do aviao e da camera.
@yggsten6 жыл бұрын
The JAS 39 Geipen in IRL... What you see is what you get...
@HisMajestyWalrus6 жыл бұрын
Is this real time camera tracking? I am incredibly impressed if so. The pessimist in me tells me this has been stabilized in post production.
@hd_jusonvlog69775 жыл бұрын
i Luv JAS Gripen
@gustavzollernmakinen15165 жыл бұрын
You have amazing skill, how can you keep a near constant zoom regardless of the distance ? why does it look so different from what we normally see in parades or flypasts ?
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Being further away and using a longer lens to compensate
@alexandremachado13375 жыл бұрын
Muito show!!!
@thedarkmonster17965 жыл бұрын
Nice fighter jet
@centech10005 жыл бұрын
belíssimo video
@flugsnug5 жыл бұрын
obrigado!
@GUILL197419745 жыл бұрын
A mi me encanta el Gripen pero me gustaría saber porque pierden en las licitaciones con otros aviones al parecer algo les falta a los representantes Suecos para introducir el producto
@olafweinzer57465 жыл бұрын
GUILLERMO MENARES Se pierde porque hay mucho dinero de propina en esas licitaciones. Aquel país superpoblado que quiere convertirse en potencia militar presenta escándalos en casi todas sus adquisiciones, submarinos, cazas, helicópteros.
@grahamariss21116 жыл бұрын
Would have made the ideal Jaguar / Harrier replacement for the RAF, and as the Sea Gripen for the Navy while the F35 is debugged over the next decade.
@eraldorh6 жыл бұрын
The sea gripen isnt a thing yet and they may as well have made a naval version of the typhoon given that it is significantly better than the gripen AND they make them. Why buy a foreign aircraft that isnt as good....
@grahamariss21116 жыл бұрын
@@eraldorh The Sea Gripen was the fall back aircraft for the RN new carriers if the F35B was cancelled. It was chosen because the alternatives needed significant modification to operate using a Ski Jump. For example the Sea Gripen required a marginal strengthening of its nose gear, the next best alternative the Typhoon needed extensive modification of both fuselage and undercarriage (this was because in the design process they needed some effort to get the weight down) plus enlarging of the control surfaces. While the Typhoon has a marginal performance advantage in the air to air role, its strike capability is still a work in progress, and of course the Gripen already has a well developed anti ship capability. The other factor that made the Gripen so attractive over the alternatives, is the low level of maintenance it needs, being designed to be serviced on improvised runways by 1 technician, 4 conscripts with the contents of one support truck and a fuel bowser. Great news with a carriers limited crew and number of aircraft. It is also not so foreign BAe has the rights already to licence production in the UK and some 35% of its current value is already provided by BAe, this was why the UK was able to block the Brazilan's selling their licenced built Gripen's to Argentina. This is why many in the navy, feel that the Gripen woukd have been the better solution for them than the F35B with a decade or more of debugging required to get truly ready for combat.
@eraldorh6 жыл бұрын
It wasnt a fall back it was just an idea. The typhoon has far more advanced systems intigrated into it than the gripen which is why it costs so much more, including better radar so a typhoon would detect and fire on a gripen long before a gripen could detect the typhoon which is...hardly marginal. Its head and shoulders above the gripen. The typhoon already has outstanding air to ground strike capability with its laser guided bombs, brimstone and storm shadow launch capability and most importantly its built and developed at home. Choosing the gripen would be just as stupid if not more stupid than choosing the f35b. Well if low maintenance is what we need we should just buy russian aircraft right? Low maintenance means less advanced and more basic systems which means much less survivability. The UK has not vetoed any sale, it could but it has not needed to and saab could simply remove any UK systems from its plane before sale and replace them much like the US made engine if the US were to block its sale. Getting rights to build a foreign aircraft is not easy nor guaranteed. Most importantly, the typhoon may cost more but given that it is most definetely a better aircraft and build at home alot of the investment in making the aircraft goes right back into the economy by creating jobs. There was already talk years back of a naval version of the typhoon and if britain made one it could sell them abroad as well, why put the money into someone elses economy!
@grahamariss21116 жыл бұрын
@@eraldorh It was the fall back aircraft to the point it dictated the size of the carriers, had the F35B been certainty when the carrier design was signed off they would have been 30K ships little bigger than the old Centaur class carriers like the Hermes. But they had to size it up to the next best thing which was the Gripen as the Typhoon required too much work and so could not be relied on as a fall back had the F35B been cancelled. The systems of the Gripen E are comparable with the Typhoon, and its ahead in its ability to exchange information around the battlefield all part of the virtue of its systems for the E variant being a decade fresher than the Typhoon's, do you want a ten year old smart phone? What you have to remember is that we are talking about a design process for carriiers was finished over a decade ago, at which time the Typhoon ground to air capability was just a possibility. The RAF only this summer taking delivery of it first Typhoon with a full swing capability, and still a long way from full operational service.. Yes we did stop the export by Brazil of the Gripen to Argentina and given that key parts of the wing structure are manufactured in the UK, it would have been unaffordably expensive had the Brazilians wanted to reverse engineer the BAe out of it as well as of course politically difficult given that they are partnered with BAe and Saab for the development and sale of the Gripen in the South American . What you write about Russian aircraft might have been true about the Mig 21, but it is mot true of maintenance hungry aircraft such as the SU24, 27, 35 or Mig 29, 31 etc. When you have a small carrier with limited number of aircraft available you need a reliable aircraft that spends minimum time below deck being fixed. The Ark Royal in its later years, for this reason could not sustain its own air defence, because its 12 F4 Phantoms would be all be unserviceable after a relative short period of intensive air operations. As F35B is now in delivery there will never be a Sea Gripen or Typhoon in service with the RN, because the window of opportunity closed for both aircraft.