I have 16 hardware synthesizers going into 2 Behringer 1602 line mixers. I stereo out from each of those into a Focusrite 1802. I also use 2 MOTU 5x5 midi interfaces and the USB midi on a few of the later model synths. It's not the greatest setup but it does work and each synth can be recorded without repatching anything. I love this stuff!
@philtrickey6 ай бұрын
I am also spoilt with loads of synths and while I love the idea of a desk, I do not have the room now (and found that it didn’t fit with my workflow). So I bought three MOTU 24 IO audio interfaces giving me 72 analogue ins and outs so I can now have all of my synths hardwired into my Cubase mixer. Perfect solution for me.
Great use of the MOTU 24. Good gear and good cost value
@ronanzann48515 ай бұрын
Exactly ! The Motu 24io's are perfect especially when used along side a bunch of 2408's, and they are REALLY inexpensive !!! Super low lantency plus low cost plus nearly unlimited channel ins and outs. And on top of all that the sound quality is top notch (no matter what anyone tells you !) The only down side seems to be the fact that they're getting pretty old now. Just make sure to leave lots of space between units, (keeping them nice and cool), and you're good !
@manofsound90986 ай бұрын
Finally, the video we have been waiting for. I have the Mackie Onyx 24 and love it! It allows me to hook up my synths and allows me to go directly to my PC, DAW setup. Thanks Scott!
@JoeSmith-v7o6 ай бұрын
Patchbays are essential. Once you have all the ins & outs connected it makes life a lot easier...just don't forget the hookup diagram.
@KNHSynths6 ай бұрын
... and its a nightmare to connect all in's and out's to and from each device to the patchbay. It costs of money for zillion of cables and you're ending with enough cable length to connect earth to the ISS :-) But once this is done, fortunately it's "easy" to use... 🙂
@crhkrebs6 ай бұрын
I respectfully disagree. I have an aggregate audio device on my old Mac with 2 8-input audio interfaces, each with their own 8-input ADAT expander. That’s 32 channels (36 if you count the two S/PDIF inputs). This also handles inserts to output gear. All latency is compensated within my DAW. No need for external mixers or patchbays and all my synths are permanently connected.
@robertkiss70036 ай бұрын
Old OS?
@crhkrebs6 ай бұрын
@@robertkiss7003 yes, Big Sur. And it works well.
@fabYT26 ай бұрын
arturia 16rig
@rickpinelli15866 ай бұрын
Back in the late 80's, I had my keyboards and modules connected with MIDI, going into a 12 channel mixer, which was connected to my 16 channel Tascam mixer that output to my Tascam 246 recorder. Lot's of FUN...
@JulianChown6 ай бұрын
Adat is also ideal as more inputs are required. I use an RME Fireface 800, which allows x3 ADAT cards, so i have 26 inputs. Great conversation btw as this is something that all us studio owners ponder on, a lot! 😊
@EannaButler6 ай бұрын
RME ❤🙏👍 Digiface USB and ADAT IO for the win
@johannilsson58296 ай бұрын
Get a Behringer UMC1820 8 channel audio interface. Throw in a couple of Behringer rack mixers RX1602. Each rack mixer will give you the opportunity to connect 8 stereo instruments to two inputs on the audio interface. So one audio interface and 4 rack mixers allows you to connect 32 stereo inputs and have 4 stereo inputs in your DAW. This of course means that synthesizers share the same audio inputs. You can then add an additional ADAT interface like Behringer ADA8200 for 8 more audio inputs. The draw back is that sample rate will be limited when connecting the ADA8200 to the UMC1820. I have 2xUMC18020 and 2xADA8200 as an aggregate device on Mac giving me 32 inputs. I have two RX1602 and an additional analog mixer. Some synthesizers are directly connected to the audio interface and some via one of the mixers. A combination of both mono and stereo synthesizers.
@f.herumusu83416 ай бұрын
The problem with mixers is that they usually just have a limited number of inserts for external effects and the integrated effects are usually just of basic quality. I decided therfore to go another way. I bought a USB-controlled patchbay (XPatch-64) and can now use all my synths and external effects in every configuration, I can even switch between true analog insert effects for tracking without any latency and use my hardware effects as sends in my DAW like a VST for mixing and mastering. And I can save and recall each configuration with a mouse click. These USB patchbays are quite expensive, but offer you the greatest flexability.
@addLADN6 ай бұрын
My life definitely changed when I discovered Samson patchbays and Iconnectivity MioXL and the Midronome or ERM Multiclock. There’s so many ways to hook all this gear up but the patchbays definitely make connecting everything easier. Great video man.
@ayosh68566 ай бұрын
Great timing! I'm about to redo my mini studio and was wondering what options I had. So much great info and explanations, great job! Note to self "Figure out how to control my studio lights with the super knob on my montage..." 😂
@SantinoHS15 күн бұрын
For years I never thought of a use to route audio through a synth...you've opened things up, thank you
@natesanti6 ай бұрын
Finally a video that’s actually NEEDED! Awesome job! There are so many videos out there like “is so and so still worth it in 2024?” or “top things you never knew your daw can do” and it’s just the first ten basic things in the manual 😂 Home studio owners need more vids like this, so thank you.
@Supernumerary6 ай бұрын
Scott!!!! Your video is desperately needed by many!!! Thank You.
@EdgetoneStudios6 ай бұрын
I went with the Presonus Studiolive 32s Series III mixer for my multikeyboard setup in my studio. It's more expensive than the Behringer, but integrates well with Studio One. It also allows you to apply Fat Channel compression and EQ while tracking, then in Studio One you can call up those effects and adjust further if you want to for mixing. To me, a digital mixer as an audio interface is the only way to go for those who want more than 8 inputs.
@ronaldfigura14656 ай бұрын
I had a Studio Live Series III 24R. When I found out I could get a free NSB 8.8 with a new Studio Live Series III 32R I returned The 24 and got the package deal. Very satisfied. I also have a Behringer XAir R18. I will eventually try to make the SL and the XAir an aggregate and have 50 input channels.
@klownaround54646 ай бұрын
@@ronaldfigura1465wait when and where did you do that?? I got the same mixer but 5-6 months ago damn
@tahiro1121Ай бұрын
Great video. And I think you have covered pretty much everything there is. I’ve been a happy owner of Yamaha DM2000 for two years after one of my friends sold it to me for 15,000JPY which would be 1/5 of their secondhand prices here. He already had two of them (different hardware revisions) and was getting the third so that two DM2000s he’d run at home would be of the newer revisions. For now, I have total of 32ch for inputs on it (24 analog + 8 via ADAT) which can be routed internally down to 8ch that gets sent out to my audio interface via ADAT.
@omrialvayero2 күн бұрын
Great video Scott! I wonder about the X32 and in general, How you connect your synth PL TS outputs to XLR inputs on mixer?
@alexwestconsulting6 ай бұрын
Those Behringer mixers are awesome. Built in effects (including sidechain) AND those inputs are actually ins/outs. I've got two of the XR18 since it's so affordable and takes up such little space. I got one, liked it so much, got another, and 2x is actually quite manageable. I may very well go to the 32 at some point since it can snake to another input box, but not sure it's worth the extra cost really, especially since a simple stage box costs way more than an XR18).
@sidetrackwalker6 ай бұрын
This is an important video for synth lovers. One option you forgot to mention, though, is ADAT: you can get an audio interface with a limited number of inputs that supports ADAT. Once you run out of inputs, you can then add additional digital inputs by adding an ADAT interface on top of it and plugging that into your interface. This way, you can upgrade to a higher input count when the need arises (i. e. after buying more synths). Myself, I was in the market for a suitable solution not too long ago, coming from an M-Audio M-Track Eight Interface with eight mono inputs. After much deliberation, I decided to put a Behringer RX1602 V2 analog mixer into my rack, which adds 16 mono inputs. The analog outputs then go into my M-Track Eight (just as you describe) and take up two of its inputs, leaving me with six additional ones (-> 22 mono inputs in total). I also have an SSL 12 interface for recording vocals, and that supports ADAT, so I might switch to that at some point, should the need arise.
@nedward58716 ай бұрын
Great article! Often overlooked, but the Mackie LM3204 rack was a godsend for me. 16 stereo channels, so perfect for rooms of synths. Since most of them lived easy lives in studio racks, can be had for under $450 used. Patchbays are also great to extend what you have, or to also add in hardware effects where needed vs. just inline.
@KierDarby6 ай бұрын
ADAT has got to be among the best options for getting a large number of analog inputs separable into your DAW, especially now that relatively inexpensive interfaces are starting to support ADAT expansion
@crhkrebs6 ай бұрын
This. I have 2 8-input audio interfaces, each connected to an 8-input ADAT expander. I’m on a Mac, so everything is aggregated together into a 32 channel audio card with 2 2channel S/PDIF inputs also. My DAW sees all this simultaneously and I gain stage each synth. Also, I have inserts for some outboard gear. No separate mixer or clunky patch bay needed.
@abulka6 ай бұрын
ADAT ❤
@SmoothBob6 ай бұрын
That intro was just like how i like my synths, with the perfect amount of cheeze! immediately subbed!
@Echochamber796 ай бұрын
"You managed to sneak it into the house past your wife"... I have no idea what you mean, Scott 😆😆😆
@ScottsSynthStuff6 ай бұрын
"What, this old thing? I've had this for years!"
@remka20006 ай бұрын
@@ScottsSynthStuffI see that everyone is using the same technics 😂. Once it's with the rest, she usually cannot really spot the new one.
@klinkske6 ай бұрын
Buy her some shoes. 😇
@K.Reimann6 ай бұрын
A good wife knows, that you need all that stuff and she will support that 😉
@Dave_Medeiros6 ай бұрын
😂😂
@mjrising25 күн бұрын
Loved the intro (snicker), and the info in the vid thanks Scott! I've been wondering about this...keep em coming!
@OdinsArcanum2 ай бұрын
Great info! I liked how you shared your journey from the beginning...ive been building my studio since covid. ive done music most my life, just not electronics. im self taught and its been a journey so it was awesome to hear the journey to more channels and audio fidelity! I feel like i just don't want to stop building
@K.Reimann6 ай бұрын
Hello Scott. Once again, a great video from you, in which you also show the possibilities of how to connect many devices inexpensively. Not everyone can afford expensive studio mixers (whether analogue or digital) and this is often forgotten on many KZbin channels, that not everyone has a well-filled wallet. A big compliment for that. I am lucky that, like you, I can call the Behringer X32 my own. Yes, it is one of the expensive solutions, but it is the cheapest of them. The Behringer X32 is currently priced at EUR 2199 in Germany (they reduced the price from EUR 2500 about 2 months after I bought the X32...(annoying). The price in the US is currently $2999. I don't know if the price has always been like that. I also have to "count" my money and thought long and hard about whether to get a smaller mixer. But then I said to myself "Do you want to change the plugs and sockets every time? Set the gain every time because every device has a different output?" I made my decision quickly and went for the X32. With the 32 XLR inputs you have peace of mind for a while. I also have 4x DI-800 8-channel DI boxes from Behringer for all 32 inputs, which luckily aren't that expensive. These DI boxes can also be used as a "patch bay" if necessary ;) And the nice thing about the X32 is that I'm not "at the end" when the 32 inputs are full. The ability to expand the X32 with additional inputs using the Behringer Stage Boxes means you don't have to buy a new mixer straight away. And cascading the X32, X32 Rack, Stage Boxes etc. really solves the problem very well. I can recommend this to anyone who wants to buy "expensive" synthesizers: Think about whether you need the 1 or 2 new synthesizers for € or $1000-2000 each. Perhaps you can wait a little longer to buy one (yes, I know. That's very hard) and invest the money in a future-proof mixer first. But for anyone who doesn't have a lot of money, Scott's solutions are a great alternative that works well. I started out that way too and there's no shame in working that way. And the "normal" consumers of your music probably wouldn't even notice the difference. Everyone does it as they can. The main thing is that you have fun with what you do and people can enjoy your music. Have a nice weekend everyone And Scott. Keep it up. I love your channel. :)
@sashaSwetlowski3 ай бұрын
I was chasing after the "everything is always playable" setup for a long time. I finally decided to give up on that, and embrace dynamic studio setups. it's a good feeling. you seem like a more organized dude in general. your studio looks awesome. thank you for the tour.
@ScottsSynthStuff3 ай бұрын
I got tired of the "wait, why can't I hear this? Why isn't this MIDI working?" killing my creative drive!
@sashaSwetlowski3 ай бұрын
@@ScottsSynthStuff I totally get that approach too.
@lyh16 ай бұрын
On windows you can use asio4all driver to use multiple interface together. And I think for the first audio interface, get one with midi is a good investment, and those come with midi will most likely more then 2ch input.
@track5musicproductions6 ай бұрын
I use Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 4th Gen USB, with Analog Mix with 16 Keyboards, with DAW using the Keyboards USB interface, it works for me on Studio 1, very Cheap and low noise mixer, Behringer RX1602 V2(This works great you chain them). He did not mention MIDI, use iConnectivity mioXL 8x12 MIDI Interface, which is great for connecting lots of MIDI devices.
@HardwiredMusicMaker6 ай бұрын
Great video as always Scott. I do have a couple of suggestions in addition to what you mentioned. One is the older Mackie Onyx Firewire mixers - still really good, you can get them used in really good shape for not much money and you can get firewire cards for PCs pretty cheap. Ironically, since Firewire was first for Macs it's actually easier to hook up firewire mixers to PCs that can take firewire cards. It can be done with newer Macs but takes several steps of adapters. The other thing I'll mention is that some fairly basic 8 channel interfaces can be expanded via ADAT to 16 or even 24 channels. Once you have a USB interface that has 8 channels input plus ADAT you can buy older interfaces for firewire that work perfectly fine for ADAT and instantly expands you inputs pretty cheaply. A studio I helped a friend put together has a Behringer USB 8 channel interface and an older Presonus firewire interface ADAT connected - the two interfaces cost about $600 all in.
@aaronthompson3176 ай бұрын
Great video! I’ve had lots of challenges attempting to get multiple pieces of gear synced and recordable at the same time. Lots of good ideas etc. Thanks! And I have that same t-shirt, in black 😊
@ojmcbaggins6 ай бұрын
good info, i use (2) Scarlett 18i20, (one in slave through ADAT). I also use that in conjunction with a second laptop with identical setup, 32 live channels for $1600. i plan on getting a patchbay and a mixer, but for different experiments..
@Mellowmancz4 ай бұрын
Great video Scott 👍🏻 My take: RME DigiFace USB has 4 ADATs so I have 4 Behringer ADA8200 hooked to it = 32 channels for ca. $1400. in total. Well the only drawback is that even in a DAWless setup you always need to boot the PC to get things going (you can then shut the PC down right after and it will be running … ) 🤷🏻♂️
@SeverityOne6 ай бұрын
My issue is space. Not that our house is small, but I have my synths in the living room, which is also my work-from-home space. I found out that this works better for me than some other, dedicated room. In the 1990s I bought a Yamaha AN1x, and Yamaha EX5, and a Yamaha 01V mixer. The latter didn't work out as planned. It's big, it was very quickly superseded by the more capable 01V96, and its value is a now a fraction of what I paid for it. I still have it, though, because of the sunk cost fallacy. Because of the space limitation, all my other synths are 19 inch rack modules. And I think I'm not the only one who thinks this way, because the modules are often more expensive than their keyboard counterparts on eBay and Reverb. One of the few where this isn't the case is the Jupiter 8 and the MKS-80, although they're not identical. I ended up with a MOTU 24Ai, and recently acquired another one. All second hand, or new in box. This gives me 48 analogue inputs in a mere 2U of rack space. It also uses proper IEC C14 connectors, so you don't have to muck around with external power supplies. And it's a universal power supply, so you can buy them from wherever they are cheapest. The second one comes from Canada, while I live in Europe. The downside is that you need special DB25-to-eight-TRS-jack snake cables, and those are pretty pricey. But all in all, including import duties, value added tax, and snake cables, I think I spent about €2000 for those 48 inputs. There are audio interfaces out there that cost a multiple of that, for fewer inputs. I've considered a lot of alternatives, including the rack version of the Behringer X32. Eventually, after literally years, I decided upon the MOTU. There was a problem for a while to actually get these units, due to the global chip shortage of a few years ago. Plus, I ran into the ASIO problem. There is a tool out there, which you can find in the Microsoft app store, called DS WASAPI ASIO router, that will solve that. If nothing else, I need it because I also have a Roland TR-8S, and I don't want to waste precious audio inputs, when this thing has USB audio. This DS WASAPI ASIO router is not free, and costs €25 here in Europe. The evaluation period expired before I had a chance to fully test it. But the point is that there are ways to get around Windows' quite frankly rubbish support for professional audio.
@73DC6 ай бұрын
Good video! I only have a couple synths and a line 6 pod go for guitar. Just a hobbyist and I only had to spend $150 US on a Mackie 12 channel mixer. I got a 4 channel interface free with credit card reward points.
@samprockАй бұрын
One more very efficient solution to add is to get usb/tb interface with Optical Input. Add another ADAT when ready. Connect it all for under $1000, not $3k-$4k at all. Mixers do not make sense, can’t even record multiple synths onto their own tracks. Once you start paying attention to in/out ADAT you can find many interfaces of your choice (from Behringer to UAD). Just look at multi-channel ones. Focusright, PreSonus, Apollo, you name it. I use 1824c + Apollo TwinX. Thinking of Arturia 16Rig, it does not spend you money on 16 mic preamps you don’t need for your synths, also has one mix you can make for your DAW, one to listen. Still can keep my old PreSonus to ADAT in more inputs.
@AndyFirebladeMuzaАй бұрын
This is what I did. I purchased a Behringer Uphoria UMC1820 8 channel Audio Interface which only cost £206 and when I needed more input channels I bought an ADAT, a Behringer ADA8200 for an additional 8 channels which cost £139. 16 channel audio interface for £345 is a bargain. The quality of both build and audio is also right up there.
@bennethosАй бұрын
My setup too… 18i20 focusrite + ADAT octopre and 2 Samson patchbays = 16 inputs. I will upgrade to a an remote fireface ucx III though probably which is expandable to a lot of inputs
@samprockАй бұрын
@@AndyFirebladeMuzaright on!
@samprockАй бұрын
@@bennethosneat! I guess samson handles non balanced inputs two? i got some synths with just tr. that’s one expensive interface with pro features!
@MFASonic5 күн бұрын
The Prism ADA-128 is not the cheapest around, but has an outstanding flexibility due to it's modular system. It allows me to have almost all of my gear directly connected, and in combination with 4 Flock Patch's I also have total recall on every analog connection that is needed.
@marcusunivers6 ай бұрын
I use a Focusrite scarlett 18i20 audio interface and expanded it with Adat and another behringer preamps. Because its controlled over software I can control it over midi. Means with one switch or button I can change my entire routing. Effects and Synths can be chained in different order with one click. My Setup contains a Casio WK3000, BossRC505, Circuit Tracks and Rhythm, Guitar Multi effect Pedal/Preamp and some mics. I have a lot of stereo channels to fill. 😏 Because I do Live Looping I often wanna change the order of my devices. Sometimes I wanna sample something from the Rhythm into the loopstation and sometimes I wanna sidechain my loopstation through the rhythm. So with one click I can change the order what is awesome for live performancing and its far less expensive then getting a big digital mixer.
@mondamnil5 ай бұрын
There are some very good Audiointerfaces with ADAT. I´m running all of my Gear throw an old Mackie 32/8 Bus Pult into a RME Fireface, expanded with a Behringer Ultragain.
@DJVasC6 ай бұрын
Scott, one thing why I'am also using a digital mixer (X32) is the option to record/monitor all of my synths seperately at once at different tracks in my DAW and apply (real-time) effects etc.
@ralis3 ай бұрын
Hi Scott I must thank you again! I ended up buying the X32 for my synths after watching this. I had an XR18 and a patch bay, it was not enough for all my synths and drum machines. Heck the X32 still is not enough so I am using a dedicated snake for the drum machines ( I still have to switch those out) not all of my synths have keys so I will be attempting to incorporate a Roland 8X8 midi patch bay with a master midi keyboard and then use my old audio patch bay for outboard effect’s routing
@abn0rm16 ай бұрын
Buying second hand older professional audio interfaces is also a way to do this. Mostly the older firewire stuff goes for pretty much nothing, firewire is old sure, but as a IO device that has 32 channels or more, it still will work fine. Would need to be a bit computer sawvy though, firewire is a problem in newer os'es so you might need to get your hands dirty and do some research. I remember i got a focusrite liquid 56 interface a few years back, it worked perfectly, I expanded inputs with a digimax d8 via adat which gave me an additional 4 stereo inputs. I've later upgraded to a new focusrite 18i20 card which is amazing and is priced reasonably, also works great with the digimax d8.
@jimmcdougall99736 ай бұрын
I have 27 guitars, which obviously doesn’t cause the same headache. But I wanted to have a guitar modeller (Kemper), a synth (MODX), drum machine, vocal processor etc, connected for live streaming. The simplest method is a mixer. Mine doesn’t have a built in interface, so I go out of the mixer, in stereo, into a Focusrite interface. Works well for me.
@thrutherockies36876 ай бұрын
Thanks Scott for a great video. I always follow your videos and it gives me great pleasure. I had the same problem a few years ago when I started building my studio. Too many synths and very difficult to sneak them down to the studio without my wife discovering 🤣I solved the input problem by buying 2 Ferrofish Pulse 16 for 32 channels. I connected these to an RME Digiface USB. It costs a lot, but god it's nice to be able to have everything connected all the time. I have heard that you can connect 3 Digiface and 6 Ferrofish to the same computer (Mac) for a total of 96 channels. Of course, the wife is told that it will never happen 😇 I agree with neatfreak 2180, iConnectivity MioXL is incredibly good for the MIDI side. I have two of them.
@ScottsSynthStuff6 ай бұрын
I also have the mioXL, I did a video on it some time back.
@davidknight7546 ай бұрын
I have a A&H SQ-5 mixer with MADI interface to connect to my outboard effects (H9000). Works great!
@AndersEngerJensen6 ай бұрын
Welcome to my world. Been working with a live setup since 1996. Enough MOTU MIDI Express 128 interfaces (10x) and five Behringer X32R/S16 and an Yamaha LS9-32 working with DANTE to my Mac. Total control. :) Btw.. You won't get Midas components on the X32, then you have to get the M32 FYI. With Macs you can create an Aggregate device using multiple interfaces.
@gryg6662 ай бұрын
Patch bay! I was looking for the name of this device! Thank you!
@yeshuam69416 ай бұрын
today I really learned something very interesting. thanks Scott.
@liamwescott92646 ай бұрын
I have a pretty simple setup for my little "home studio" that is reflective of my needs. Unlike you, I only have two keyboards, both Yamaha. I have my MODX7 and a CS1x. There is about twenty years separating them in terms of technology and connectivity. I got the MODX in 2019 from Pro Music Alaska, a music store here owned by an old college buddy. He helped me with everything I needed to get my keyboards set up. I have a Tascam audio interface and an eight-channel mixer. The MODX was much easier to connect because of the USB connection, but I had to use a MIDI connection for the CS1x. I had another old friend of mine build a two-tier keyboard/music desk. The two keyboards are on platforms that pull out, one on top of the other, and the top of the thing has my monitors and the small dedicated computer for my music production, along with the monitor for that. And there is a whole spaghetti pile of cables and connections going this way and that on the top of the stand. But it works for me, more or less. Anyway, this was a great video as always!
@fingazfunkАй бұрын
Excellent post! Forgive me for being off topic, but you’ve quite the collection of synths my friend. When did you find the time to figure each one of them out or is that in itself a work in progress?
@ScottsSynthStuffАй бұрын
I try to learn each one as I get it, and then go back occasionally to refresh on them so I don't completely forget how to operate and program them!
@mrratskins6 ай бұрын
Big yes on the patch bay. Also useful is a MIDI patch bay such as the Ensoniq KMX-16. You can connect 16 MIDI devices, which is useful if you want to control a synth that has very few keys (or none), with another synth that has a better keyboard such as an 88 key hammer action controller. Also, you can take a MIDI track in your DAW and route it to one synth or another and then record the audio out.
@mk1st6 ай бұрын
I got a Conductive Labs MRCC. Changed my (synth) life.
@mrratskins6 ай бұрын
I just checked it out. That looks fantastic! And I see where you can connect two together if you need more jacks. It looks very much like my ensoniq but with a lot more connectivity for newer protocols such as USB. Thanks for the tip. I notice their dealer in Portland has a wide selection of brands available including Buchla. I will to look in greater detail. Could be dangerous.
@ScottsSynthStuff6 ай бұрын
I use a mioXL: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b6fHeX6HpZJniM0
@Pintosonic6 ай бұрын
I went with Motu AVB interfaces. As soon as you need more than 18 inputs. You buy a Motu 1248 or any other Motu interface with thunderbolt interface, AVB and the set of audio inputs you need (they have a lot of models with various type and number of I/O). Then on your synth rack you buy Motu 24Ai that give you 24 line level inputs that you can send through AVB with a CAT6 cable to the other Motu interface connected to the computer through thunderbolt. In my case, I have one Motu 828 ES with a Motu 24Ai and it gives me a total of 32 line level inputs, 2 microphones inputs with phantom power, 8 line level outputs, 4 monitors outputs, 2 headphones outputs. All this for about $2000. And I have 5 sets of ADAT input and outputs so I can potentially add 40 analog inputs and 40 analog outputs by using ADAT preamps and output modules. I also have the possibility to add an AVB switch and add more Motu 24Ai.
@PumpkinSeed176 ай бұрын
Just read up on AVB capabilities. Impressive! Thank you!
@JanMichalSzulew6 ай бұрын
It's true - the Mac has an "aggregate audio device". There's a caveat though. The reason for Windows allowing you to using only one is that you need to sync to the audio interface/synth (in this case - the Montage) audio clock. Obviously it can't sync to more than one and one synth's clock might be not run at the exact same frequency as the other one (i.e. one might be somewhere around 44101Hz, another one at 44098). Mac circumvents this via... resampling those synth outputs to its own clock. Yup. If you use an aggregate audio device you forfeit the sample-accurate audio. I hope this is clear?
@gaetan_gm25576 ай бұрын
Behringer rx1602 v2 can also be a good option for 110€/120$... - 8 Stereo inputs - stage gaging @ each stereo inputs + Mute / pad... No eq but 8 synths can be pluged an take only a stereo input on your harware audio card. Got a studiolive 16/4/8 but never inputs enough ;)
@DjMorningstartrancedj6 ай бұрын
Thank you for the video quick question. How would you connect 2,3 synths and drum muchine together maybe with a Yamaha mixer?
@RoofLight006 ай бұрын
Get a Yamaha O2R second hand. They’re 200 quid used, make sure you get one with a meter bridge though as you can see all your levels. Get a couple of ADAT cards with optical outs and run those digital outs into a couple of linked USB motu 828 mk2’s. You can run one of the motu’s via FireWire to your computer for 16 digital channels in real time. Enjoy!
@jimhewes75076 ай бұрын
If I were going to get a 32 channel digital mixer I think I'd get the PreSonus StudioLive 32SX over the Behringer. I like the FlexMixes and it looks beautiful besides. Though I think it's a tough call between that and getting two Arturia AudioFuse 16Rig interfaces chained together. The PreSonus gives you more for about the same price with its Fat Channel processing and a hands-on, physical interface. But if you're trying to save space then the AudioFuse would help you do that. Often you only need to set the volume levels and forget it anyway. The only thing that would bother me about the AudioFuse is that it apparently requires a software app to do the signal routing.
@manofsound90986 ай бұрын
May I request a video on how to keep all your gear clean? Especially mixers. You won't believe how many videos I see on YT with studio gear, and it looks like they never clean their gear. Dust everywhere and that only ruins gear in time. Maybe include room temp and carpet or Hardwood for other reasons of dust and cleanliness. Also maybe add the best way to use power strips to connect your gear. I have my strips mounted on the rear of my stands for each 3-4 tiers and then several others on the wall at desk height. Hope Scott reads tis and comes up with something on the "How to keep your studio gear clean and connected" :)
@ScottsSynthStuff6 ай бұрын
I keep everything under dust covers (when not shooting a video). This video has a link to the dust covers I use.
@Reg-Edit5 ай бұрын
One thing I would say that is an advantage by having something like focusrite claret 8 pre with eight individual extra ADAT inputs is that you don’t have as many cables as you do when you are using patch, bays ( 50% less cables ) and external mixers and a byproduct of that is less noise That way each synth gets a direct route with a decent-ish preamp straight into the computer It’s raw But then you have the whole canvas to work with when processing in the box
@thedeepblueskys19 күн бұрын
I currently use a Behringer U-Phoria UMC1820 8 channel audio interface. It lets you connect an additional 8 channels via an optical connection. That unit is called the ADA8200 and it goes for about $150. I think I paid $190 or something for the UMC1820. So together you get 16 multi-tracked channels of good quality audio with those Midis Preamps. All for about $350. I also use a Akai Midimix to control the DAW levels (Reason10) mixer knobs with it. The Midimix only goes for around $100 and works flawlessly with my DAW. Like said in the video, I can also make a Mac virtual sound card of multiple interfaces, so if I wanna add another 16 multi-tracked channels of this set up I can. All on a 2010 MacBook Pro lol Hope this inspires someone on a budget.
@JKVisFX6 ай бұрын
You just spelled out exactly why I am Mac based. With the Audio MIDI Setup app, you can set up any kind of mixer and audio interface configuration you want. If I wanted to, I could buy a bunch of cheap(er) four or eight channel audio interfaces and combine them into one virtual interface. Or, I could purchase tow of something like that Behringer digital mixer/interface and combine them. Or I could have a mix of all kinds of different interfaces. Also, since Thunderbolt is native to the Mac, I could get higher-end thunderbolt interfaces that take advantage of the much faster data rate of Thunderbolt. I had a windows machine for a while and really did not like it. It was a constant stream of driver clashes, conflicts, and things that just plain did not work correctly. I was constantly chasing problems and having to really learn how to dive deep into the long myriad of disparate configuration dialogs spread throughout Windows, many of which were hidden many layers deep inside. Never again. My windows machine has been wiped and reconfigured as a file server and a rendering node, nothing else.
@keyboardtek6 ай бұрын
Dealing with the wiring mess can be a chore, especially when having to trace an intermittent audio or MIDI line. I bought a bag of colored nylon tiewraps that have a tag to stick a label on and put them at the plug end of every cable. I labeled where they go so I can keep track of what it plugs into. For limited space, line level mixers are useful for keyboard rigs as they usually have all stereo inputs. Fine if you do not need effects sends or use microphones.
@mike424415 ай бұрын
Wow !!! Looks like a synth store! Awesome video, thanks Scott!
@Wee0waH6 ай бұрын
Thank you! Great video. Next i sant to know how you connect midi with so many synths?
@thetruemrstallings15 күн бұрын
I use a midi patchbay.
@kellygreenii6 ай бұрын
Macs allow you to use a different interface for input vs output. They also allow you to combine multiple interfaces that behave like a single I/o device (aggregate interface). This ability is why I switched to Mac from pc. Made getting my hardware for both keyboards and guitar modelers to play well with each other 100x easier.
@Vim-Wolf2 ай бұрын
Thanks for this you resolved an issue for me. Despite having a 32 channel analogue main mixer I still ran out of inputs (curse that GAS) so I’m using submixers in the rack. This was frustrating me as I couldn’t apply effects to the individual synths on these as the rack mixers have no inserts. What I realised watching this is I can use patchbays paired with the rack mixers as insert points, problem solved, thanks very much.
@minisynthmaniac6 ай бұрын
Great. I already have a small Yamaha mixer (MG12/4FX), a Behringer mixer (MX1604A), and you just made a sale on the PX3000 patchbay 😀
@Deathoutofhell3 ай бұрын
8:20 you actually can. The solution to that would be VB-Audio Matrix Coconut (names a bit of a mouthful - but it works really well!) it can handle at least 6 simultaneous ASIO devices with channel counts from 8 to 512 per device and does alot of crazy routing in the box with a matrix mixer. Really recommend to check it out for the cheap setup. At some point USB inputs become a limitation but good powered USB hubs work aswell. I have no trouble connecting two audio interfaces, a USB microphone and a guitar multi fx that has interface functionality and I am not even using half the asio device slots and only a fraction of the maximum 3000 audio channels the software is capable of.
@drakula420_2 ай бұрын
Great info right here!
@mungewell6 ай бұрын
You didn't mention 'digital stage boxes', which could be flug in a far corner of the studio. The X32 is equiped with swappable expansion cards for connecting to other multi-channel audio networking via USB, ADAT, MADI and Dante protocols, in addition to the onboard ULTRANET and AES50 connectivity.
@nghf29066 ай бұрын
Thanks for great input. I believe one option - with great price/performance - is missing for the purpose of having a lot of synths connected to the audio interface (and the computer/DAW) and to always be ready-to-record: simply use one, two, three or more rack line mixers, such as the clean Behringer RX-1602 V2. Each mixer provides 16 inputs. Your main outs (L/R) from your last mixer in your chain goes into two of these inputs on the second mixer (and so on); and the last mixer main outputs connects to your audio interface. Cannot think of any cheaper and yet such a good/clean way of connecting multiple synths 👋
@ScottsSynthStuff6 ай бұрын
Daisy chaining mixers like that adds noise - each mixer in the chain adds a bit more noise. It's better to have a set of mixers that all connect to a single submixer, which then feeds the input. That way, the most number of mixers the signal traverses is two.
@MarkGardner66Bonnie6 ай бұрын
Great information Scott... thanks for sharing!
@mrdavies78946 ай бұрын
I am “down to” 12 synths (currently; still selling and buying to refine the “perfect set”!) but also use a lot of outboard gear and need room for folks to plug in their instruments, microphones, &c. My solution (in addition to the MioXL ;) is a 32-channel passive summing mixer for most of the synths (since I can gain-stage the volume controls and then mix via MIDI volume) but then be able to patch in my “special children” when I need outboard processing or a full mixer channel or whatever. I do not understand why passive summing mixers are not wildly popular for this application, but I plan to build more since they seem to be so rare!
@gabo3k3k6 ай бұрын
I wish you’d mentioned submixers, I’m on a really small space experimenting with “Moukey” 6 channel mixers feeding in to a rx1602. The 1602 provides a headphone out that goes to my bass amp, ( zero latency monitoring is key) and also an effect return for a reverb pedal, as well as the main out to the interface. So I can play the hw synths + iPad synths Dawless, that is very important for me.
@goldmanz48526 ай бұрын
I use a UAD twin with an 8 channel digital break out box. pretty cost efficient and sounds excellent
@RayyMusik6 ай бұрын
Wow, the Montage M superknob is more powerful than ever! 😉 I have roughly as many synths as you - but a very cheap connectivity solution. Having no space for a huge mixer, I use three cheap 19“ Behringer RX1602 Mk.2 going into a Focusrite Scarlett 18i8 audio interface connected to my Mac. The Behringers have volume & pan control plus FX send per channel; they are pretty noiseless for my old ears. I don‘t think that synths require full-fledged mixers with all those features useful for vocals, drums, guitars etc. The sound is made on the synth itself. The only minor problem is the position of outboard FX in the signal flow. I came up with this: RX1606 #1 and #2 => RX 1603 #3 (=> FX send to my main FX units in series) => Scarlett => Mac. I.e., on the audio interface I need one stereo channel for the RX 1602 #3 and one for the FX output. That‘s it. Not perfect but workable.
@user-nu7xx7pc1d6 ай бұрын
great video! now I am using a Tascam Model 24 and it is working fine for me.
@caprimaniac016 ай бұрын
Nice sum-up, but I miss the Midi and Master keyboard part which is also a very difficult topic to get the correct routing done.
@Johnsormani3 ай бұрын
It all depends on your workflow. If you are constantly trying out different synths in your current project it makes sense. I can work fine with limited channels and a patch bay, since I don’t have all of my 65 synths on standby anyway
@noisevector6 ай бұрын
If you also want everything connected via MIDI, you can use Kenton MIDI splitters for that. You don't have to daisy chain your gear and have it turned on unused to transmit via MIDI.
@ScottsSynthStuff6 ай бұрын
I use the mioXL: kzbin.info/www/bejne/b6fHeX6HpZJniM0
@MKA636 ай бұрын
Admittedly a much smaller scale than you are talking about, but I think my Zoom L-12 deserves an honourable mention 😀
@jeffryarchambeau54413 ай бұрын
And if you don't feel like starting up the DAW, just record to its SD card!
@chrisstaubyn6 ай бұрын
While I have an expensive multichannel audio interface (Steinberg AXR4U), there are cheaper [than $3k and $4k] options. For example, the Steinberg UR816C (16 ins/outs) costs about $600.
@troublesomecorsair6 ай бұрын
The best is RME Fireface with Ferrofish extension via ADAT and RME M-32 Pro extension via MADI for 60 channels but these days I'd probably go with that new Arturia 16rig with two x8 In ADAT expanders. That should get up to 32 channels in a nice compact space.
@MrSmithUK6 ай бұрын
I use an 02r96 into a fireface 800. Plenty of inputs plus more analog & Adat options. Mine sits in an Argosy console and 14 synths are permanently connected. Plus also 2track DAT & Cassette (!). Not forgetting outboard returns into channels, for recording into logic/PT. It’s a great system that really works well. The RME provides master clock to the 02r96. These desks are often criticised for their hard eq. On the original 02r, I’d have to agree. But not so with the 24bit 96k mk2. That’s said, I belive in clean unadulterated sound. I can’t recommend these old Yamaha desks enough because they are astonishingly cheap these days. I’ve seen original 02rs selling for £150 ($200). It’s worth it for the noise gate and compressor on every chennel !!
@qrdnk6 ай бұрын
...started with a cassette recorder either when I was a 4year old boy. Later, in the middle of the nineties, I got me a Behringer mixing desk for my first synth stuff still recording with a cassette tape deck improving to an audio cd recorder a few years later 😜 ...as time goes by 😇
@willb11575 ай бұрын
Lovely, Thanks! My word, I had a portastudio AND an Ensoniq Mirage! Heady Days!
@mrdali676 ай бұрын
On Windows you can install Asio4All, which is an Asio Wrapper. In it you can combine several Asio devices to one. The con is Asio4All uses its own drivers which is of course not optimized with each hardware device. And afaik there is no way to do sample acurate sync unless you have 2 devices that can sync via an adat optical cable or coax wordclock.
@ScottsSynthStuff6 ай бұрын
I thought about mentioning this, but Asio4all causes so many latency and stability problems (at least for me) , I've never been able to get it to work successfully and consistently.
@mrdali676 ай бұрын
@@ScottsSynthStuff Ya I agree. I have also tried using it eg. together with a soundblaster and a small 2ch Presonus and also throw it away, and today the soundblaster drivers is actually ok latency wise alone, but the Asio4All totally hampered the Presonus performance, so I decided it was not worth paying for. Windows has always been kinda poorly coded with how it handles multimedia devices. Had major issues getting my Kronos USB to play along until I found out the culpit was how Windows handles the different multimedia devices. People should delete all the devices they don’t actively use. If you have more than 10 devices installed things go haywire and you manually have to edit the matrix adressing each device in the registry, which is not for the faint of heart unless you know what your doing
@bassnbikes.6 ай бұрын
I have successfully used asio4all with a bunch of Roland Boutiques and a multichannel audio interface. Have to increase latency/buffer due to my old laptop and mixer is 24/24. I enable a subset of ins and outs and seems better. Boutiques with a 2x2 is great. Probably USB 2 and old computer to blame not asio4all.
@Timetraveller22086 ай бұрын
The second I started watching this brilliant and needed video, I recognised the first note played on the first synth at the beginning. I racked my brains knowing it was the intro from a JMJ album track. Finally I found it. It's the exact key he uses.... The track and album... (check if you like): Oxygene 7-13 Track 7.
@PacifierMusic6 ай бұрын
I picked up the rack mount Presonus 32R. 32 In and you get 16 out and Main out. You can control it from an iPhone or iPad. I also use a $128 Behringer rack mixer for random extra stuff. Total of 48 In. Solved my issues.
@AstrAir16 ай бұрын
At Sweetwater for $ 1700, so not "thousands of dollars"
@j.b.williamson37166 ай бұрын
For any on a budget (like me!), check out the Allen & Heath CQ-20B. I bought one for my blues band (now rip) as a live mixer/recorder, moving up from a Soundcraft 12Mkt, which still sounded good for live use as a bar band. The CQ, being digital, sports a 24x24 (@48kHz), or 16x16 (@96kHz) USB. It's awesome. I'm supporting a Modx+, BARP GM2600, Korg Wavestate, Arturia Analog Lab and a bunch of East/West symphonic samples. Great mixer & interface.
@Sonikbytes6 ай бұрын
For a small 12 inputs audio setup Behringer x air 12 digital mixer is great plus you can record your live mix to USB stick and it's road worthy. You can get higher models but it'll cost more. What should be mentioned that quality cables will add up to be just as pricey as the hardware itself
@jakob4536 ай бұрын
Im still have this Emu Interface. Its still pretty good. I connected a Korg 168RC Mixer over Adat to connect my Synths to my DAW.
@b.hornetiii.67714 ай бұрын
The more problem I see is reaching all of those synths fast enough so you don't lose your "creative momentum" and while doing that tour from synth to synth your hands start to hurt as an additional bonus, so here I would say is more than appropriate the old saying: "Less is more." It looks great, but from a creative stand point a total nightmare if you really want to create something complex and larger than life. It must be some kind of mathematical formula for this situations, "when more becomes less".
@dxtrs_mnpltr5 ай бұрын
Check out the Arturia 16RIG. Lots of ins/outs (+adat expandability) and very good routing options. Top notch audio quality at a competitive price.
@wiseradical33865 ай бұрын
A used Motu 828x around 200/300 bucks should do wonders for most people. 8 analog in/outs, 2 mic/guitar in, 16 digital channels. Built in mixer with VERY GOOD reverb, EQ and lot's of other stuff.
@flashchrome6 ай бұрын
Exactly this is what I needed to watch. Thanks for sharing
@frankmuscato77414 ай бұрын
Great advice and options for multi synth connections. Do you have a video of MY mind boggling method of the patch bay option? Thank you
@JoeJohnston-taskboy6 ай бұрын
I am literally waiting for delivery of a Behringer pre-amp to expand the number of inputs on my Scarlett 18i8 from 8 to 16 using the optical (ADAT) jack. Fingers crossed that it will work as expected. But yes, unplugged synths do not get used.
@crhkrebs6 ай бұрын
This is what I have and the Behringer works like a charm.
@JoeJohnston-taskboy6 ай бұрын
@@crhkrebs This setup is also working for me now (at 44.1k, which is fine for me).
@crhkrebs6 ай бұрын
@@JoeJohnston-taskboy I use 44.1kHz too.
@itsJoel596 ай бұрын
I currently use an old RME Fireface with a Creamware A16 ADAT, it works like a charm...as long as I have access to Firewire/thunderbolt 3 😁 Oh and patchbays are great, I want a second one!!
@DougGray-xf3hzАй бұрын
I’m sure Reaper running on Linux would be capable of accepting many different USB inputs simultaneously. So for those with USB audio connect them directly, for those with analog out put use an audio interface. I honestly thought this would have been where you were going to land. As an added bonus you could output midi to each of the synths from Reaper as well. Linux honestly can manage USB audio like you expect a computer should be able to do.
@stephencrane5615 ай бұрын
Thank you for this; however, the biggest issue I've got - and have always had - is distributing some time-based sync function across all my synths, keyboards, modular and effects so the arps and sequencers are all in time. Howsabout a video describing how you go about distributing MIDI Clock (or whatever timing protocol(s) you deploy) throughout your setup? The Detail:- I seldom - if ever - move my setup around (save for when I play a very simplified setup 'live'); however, I want to be able to be able to sit down at any device (MIDI controller keyboard, sequencer, pattern generator or synth) and have everything else synchronised to them when I press 'play' (or start arpeggiating on a synth!). That means either my Conductive Labs NDLR, Arturia's BeatStep Pro, Arturia's KeyStep 37, my Vermona Melodicer, Pamela's New Workout, my Doepfer Darktime, Korg SQ-1, Behringer 182 (via a Doepfer A190-4), or my (Cubase) DAW - when I'm using it - puts out appropriate clock/timing info (usually MIDI 24PPQN MIDI Clock) which is distributed appropriately whenever any one of these devices are actually running. [Note: Unfortunately, the NDLR appears to put out MIDI Clock even when it's not actually playing and requires menu diving in order to turn it off and back on, whereas the Melodicer is never, ever off, which is why I slave it to incoming CV timing info via Pamela's!] I currently have everything (including Pamela's!!!) synchronised to my NDLR via an ageing (and faulty) parallel port MotU MIDI Express XT successfully operating in MIDI "Merge All" mode for ALL 8x8 MIDI ports ... but have got to come up with a better solution in order to avoid inevitable MIDI loops and to reduce the sheer amount of MIDI sync timing data flowing around every, single device in my setup! I'm seriously considering investing in a Conductive Labs MRCC - to replace my old MotU XT - simply so that I can create an appropriate distribution matrix which can be recalled at the flick of a switch. [MIDI gets into my Eurorack setup / modular environment via a Doepfer A192-2 and out of it via the aforementioned A190-4. MIDI gets into and out of my DAW via a USB3-connected ESI Audio M8U eX alongside the aforementioned MotU XT coupled to myriad Kenton Thru and Merge boxes. I try to only ever use MIDI over USB for firmware updates and initial setup/config matters because of ground loop and graphics whine issues, plus the inevitable confusion at the DAW end.] So, any ideas, Scott!? Howsabout a video describing how you go about distributing MIDI Clock (or whatever timing protocol(s) you deploy) throughout your setup? PS This started off as a really short 'request' comment and only grew as I realised most parts required a little bit more 'clarification' in order to communicate exactly what I'm trying to achieve. Sorry!
@patrickcampbell87575 ай бұрын
Thank you, Scott. You offered a lot of really great solutions. - I am trying to have the option to record midi simultaneously. Would you recommend using the midi through option or a dedicated interface? - signal flow is complicated logic for me. So I want the get this right. My space is cramped and I can't be plugging in and unplugging constantly. Needs to be " ready to go". - I will watch your other videos.