Guy selected as a juror turned out to be the real culprit, while the defendant faces a life sentence

[@marchealgideon7916]

So the jury only said he was guilty so they could go home? I wonder how many people got sentenced because of that.

[@waj-efc1372]

WELCOME. You seem to have taken the EYES WIDE OPEN pill. It's a whole new world 😂

[@lastpme]

A lot…

[@endryudzhenn4398]

that happens frequently.

[@J1WE]

I highly doubt that 12 people would all put someone behind bars just to go home.

[@bbzvxb3929]

@@J1WEyou got too much faith in people and the courts😂

[@lastpme]

I’m thinking the DA could show a mistrial since the juror should had removed himself once he realized he caused the accident.

[@Zirillla]

I love people who are watching movie recaps and complaining about spoilers. 😂

[@eleanor-f1n]

nice

[@JackLawrence-dn2jb]

People watch movie recaps so they don't waste 90 minutes on what could be a shit movie. You still want to not be spoiled even if it's a shortened version.

[@PunkyPrincessPop]

They’re not complaining about spoilers about the film, they’re complaining that the twist is given away. That is annoying even if it’s a recap, the whole point of a twist is that it’s something that’s unexpected.

[@indiathylane2158]

@@PunkyPrincessPop I've read Wiki Film is the world's most popular movie review with plot synopsis. People reading _know_ the entire plot will be described. Twist included. Same with these recaps. Don't click on them if you don't want to know. And if a popular TV series is being discussed, we all know in the comments section, later plot developments will be discussed. I mean if the topic is two main character interactions in series 3, and one of them is killed in S4, readers have to be prepared for that. You might have come online to enjoy hashing over S3, the latest series you've watched. But anyone mentioning a surprise death/capture/change of heart/plot twist in S4 has every right to.

[@PunkyPrincessPop]

@@indiathylane2158 Obviously, but people are complaining about the twist being given away IN THE TITLE. You want to be surprised about the twist when watching a film the same as in a recap. If you’ve given it away in the title it takes away the element of surprise. For instance, would you see a film if the title of it ruined the ending? No, you’d want that to be revealed as you watch it and enjoy the full experience. If they wrote the twist to The Sixth Sense in the title it would make the experience less enjoyable. I don’t know how else to explain this to you if you don’t understand.

[@iwantsifegold]

This is what happens when you write a legal drama without a freaking lawyer presence

[@NWAWskeptic]

Yeah. But also keep in mind the entire story of 12 Angry Men, one of the most revered legal films, would also be 100% not allowed in real life and most certainly would have resulted in a mistrial if anyone shared the goings on in the deliberation room.

[@Addictedtofamilyguys]

I don't think he did it... It could still be the bf, cos James also saw him driving back from that spot on that same night

[@marionamewontwork2681]

good point, or the writers messed up (/directors)

[@ericanthony011]

the bf didn't drive back he made a u-turn, driving in the opposite direction

[@RunninBackchic44]

That's an option but they stated that the boyfriend's car wasn't damaged. Sidenote I wonder why the writers didn't include tire track evidence or something. Maybe rain distorts that evidence?

[@lastpme]

He did…on accident and didn’t realize he did it. But once he realized he accidentally caused her death he was willing to ruin the BF life. Plus, since he felt he accidentally caused her death, he should had held out for not guilty to at least cause a mistrial.

[@hudsonmilbank]

If the prosecutor found out that there was juror misconduct, she was supposed to report that, so she was guilty also.

[@epinkus]

He should have told the lawyer once he remembered that he too was in the bar the same night. He would have been removed from the case and another juror would take his place.

[@Memory_visit]

Always here for Toni Collette

[@raeraebadfingers]

It took me way too long to realize that was her and then I felt dumb

[@pelumiadenuga]

Things like this pisss me off. Either admit to being there or just keep your mouth shut. He feels hes doing the right thing by trying to help but every single time he kept his mouth shut he was just a coward. So lets call a spade a spade.

[@zoyadulzura7490]

13:47 "Faith was lost in thought." An interesting sentence removed from context.

[@ryleighloughty3307]

This is the moral relative and unprincipled society that we now live in. Heaven help us.

[@ankitasharma307]

Great as always 🎉

[@marryannflores396]

Love ur recap. But just the title itself gave this whole up😅

[@ashley89108]

WHY WOULD YOU PUT THE ENDING IN THE TITLE? It got spoiled for me because your videos was in my recommendations. Thanks!

[@yellowkai247]

same but i still went and watched it on max anyway 🤣

[@ecasechos7763]

Truth, like wtf. I did the whole “do not recommend this channel” thing because of it. You lose viewers being inconsiderate.

[@AshleighDanburry]

who cares? it's a recap. Plus the how would be in the video which is more interesting. so whiny

[@thatgirlPAIGE94]

Great recap/film!

[@TextrovertSolidork-KT]

Maybe don’t spoil the movie in the title? This video was in my recommended and I only clicked to write this comment. That’s a dick move for anyone just scrolling

[@juliusogsimarpis-an2811]

He is guilty not only for one victim but two

[@josefk7437]

Is the Justin played by Nicholas Holt? He looks a lot like Tyler from The Menu.

[@anjalibhangare581]

Yes it's him

[@HelenL2-b1i]

Good recap and movie too 🍿🍿🍿🍿

[@Tomy_Yon]

Mmm, I don't know about writing the plot in the titles. I know it's a recap, but give us still something...

[@miriamllamas224]

I hate your video titles 😡

[@marionamewontwork2681]

because they are long or?

[@Quijote92]

😂

[@miriamllamas224]

@@marionamewontwork2681 because they give away the whole plot.

[@zoyadulzura7490]

Haha, I agree that spoilers in titles are a real problem in recap videos (along with misleading titles), but if the trailer gives away a certain bit of information, I see it as fair game for a recap title. If spoilers in titles are a consistent problem, I just block the channel.

[@FlameMoose37]

I watched a movie where the Prosecutor drove drunk and hit a guy that ran in front of him. He got out saw him then drove home. (cause he was drunk.) Well he volunteered for the case and got the guy off. But the guy was a serial killer whom the victim ran away from. Talk about a twist.

[@joshwright2286]

Man you could at least not ruin the twist in the title. I actually wanted to watch the movie but now its ruined 😞

[@mollymelena6104]

If you wanted to watch the actual movie, you shouldn't be watching the recaps because the ending will be given away every single time 🤷‍♀. I actually clicked on because I was intrigued by the twist given away by the title of the clip.

[@joshwright2286]

@mollymelena6104 ????????? What about if I don't wanna be spoiled by the ending when I'm just scrolling my feed??

[@MissKamara95]

@@joshwright2286I mean, you decided to watch this video. You didn’t have to press play….

[@joshwright2286]

@MissKamara95 bro I DIDNT WATCH THE VIDEO??! Can you not read? THE. TITLE. SPOILED. THE. MOVIE. IN. MY. FEED. I'm only here to comment that the creator of this channel needs to stop spoiling shit in the fucking title

[@ThatGuy-bz2in]

@@MissKamara95 his point is that the title of the video spoils the movie. So you don't have to press play to have the movie spoiled. KZbin just has to recommend it for you.

[@ulexite-tv]

AI recaps of movies? Please, no.

[@richard1493]

Thanks for spoiling the twist in the title for those of us who actually wanted to see the film.

[@Vasilia4]

*Dude, stop narrating stories in the past tense unless referring to past events in the plot*

[@zoyadulzura7490]

Why does that matter? It's how books are usually written. As long as the tense is consistent, I don't see a problem.

[@Vasilia4]

@@zoyadulzura7490 Firstly, it is not consistent. Secondly, it does not work for these tyoes of videos. If anything, it is confusing

[@recapsjob]

Your recap is great at explaining the events! Perhaps mention if the movie evokes a specific emotional journey, like nostalgia, suspense, or joy.

[@PallidusCarnifex]

Was that Urkel?

[@P3rmissionD3ni3d]

As soon as I saw him I knew. It certainly is Urkel! Well Stefan if we want to be technical.

[@ambermitchell5838]

The other juror..? If so, absolutely not.

[@P3rmissionD3ni3d]

@@ambermitchell5838 I think he is talking about the actor at 1:02. Cedric Yarbrough. It was the eyes. It is NOT Urkel :-(

[@t.dorazio2784]

aw man, did you just spoil the ending in the video title??? dammit

[@bmcminn8838]

No that information is literally in the trailer and the entire set up for the movie

[@t.dorazio2784]

@@bmcminn8838 oh good! thanks. it's on my to-watch list. lol

[@Black_and_Green]

I agree with Marcus that it was James fault for leaving her to fend for herself.

[@NeoCreo1]

Accept that is complete bullshit because that in NO WAY equates to murder. You are also letting the actual murder get off Scott free under that logic as well, which is extra repugnant.

[@Jepse89]

I hate when title is a spoiler

[@zoyadulzura7490]

Curious to know how the phrase "hit and run" was typed out--the voice makes it sound like "hit an drun" or something.

[@SaltpeterJohn]

Don't spoil the movie in the title, jerk.

[@cy4330]

Don't watch jerk!

[@yudodis]

Thank you for including a complete spoiler for your own video and the movie in the title. I'm unsubscribing so you can't ruin another movie for me 😊

[@jackdaniels5134]

You don't have to announce your departure, this isn't an airport 🤣😂🤣

[@KA-mo7nd]

@@jackdaniels5134😂😂😂

[@bz6837]

By Felicia

[@lisedabataracil]

By the way, the trailer of the movie inclues that Justin is guilty

[@Mis_wangui]

​@@jackdaniels5134😂😂😂😂

[@MaxwellsDemon9]

Can you train your AI reader to pronounce things correctly?