Has The Church Replaced Israel?

Рет қаралды 11,702

The Line of Fire

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 136

@iwouldprefernotto5179 2 жыл бұрын

The people of the Promise = all believers of Jesus Christ.

@tonymuse 7 жыл бұрын

Believing Gentiles have not replaced Israel, they have been grafted in/adopted. An adopted child does not replace the natural child. Being called Israel has to do with believing on the promise, not being of flesh. _Romans 9:6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For they are not all Israel who are descended from Israel; 7 nor are they all children because they are Abraham’s descendants, but: “through Isaac your descendants will be named.” 8 That is, it is not the children of the flesh who are children of God, but the children of the promise are regarded as descendants._ This applies to all, not just Hebrews.

@pbksocial 6 жыл бұрын

When God promised to scatter/regather Jews, He meant ancient Jews in the old covenant. And that's exactly what happened. He scattered them via the Captivities and after 70 years regathered them, thus 100% fulfilling all of those promises made by the prophets. In a similar way, God continued to regather Jews under the Great Shepherd Jesus as He brought them into His fold (Eze 34:23 fulfilled in the regathering of Ezra, Nehemiah and Esther) and then in John 10:14-16 Jesus says He will not only regather Jews, but also Gentiles ("other sheep not of this fold.") It all works perfectly if you just believe what the Bible says and stop adding to it.

@thomasmarchese2808 Жыл бұрын

Well. Owning the land forever. Hasn’t happened. And that’s for the Jews.

@AngelaGrant2015 8 жыл бұрын

The Bible makes it clear that we gentiles are the wild branch grafted in. The church started with the Jews first, and then the gentiles joined in later.

@AngelaGrant2015 8 жыл бұрын

+Moreno James Yes.

@wilkoswilkos4027 8 жыл бұрын

So, if a person converts to Judaism in 1800s and his generation call themselves jew is a remnant? or i a person converts to christianity is remnant? or someone has to be on on the bloodline since exile jew?

@imago9059 Жыл бұрын

Read Romans 11:24 For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, the natural branches, be grafted back into their own olive tree.

@SpotterVideo 2 жыл бұрын

Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See Galatians 3:8) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the KZbin video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church: “The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?

@imago9059 Жыл бұрын

Romans 11:24 For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, the natural branches, be grafted back into their own olive tree.

@SpotterVideo Жыл бұрын

@@imago9059 Romans Chapter 11: In its New Covenant context... There is no Plan B of salvation outside of the New Covenant Church in this passage. Plan A is found in verses 23 and 24. In Romans 1:16 Paul said the Gospel was taken "first" to the Jews. This time period can be found in Matt. 10:5-7, and Acts 10:36-38, and Gal. 1:14-18. Many try to claim God never gave the Jews a chance to accept Christ, so there must be some Plan B of salvation before or during the Second Coming of Christ. Romans 1:16 proves they are wrong, since Paul said the Gospel went "first" to the Jews. Many ignore the fact that Peter addressed the crowd as "men of Judea", and as "men of Israel", and as "all the house of Israel" on the Day of Pentecost, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. The Gentiles were not grafted in until several years later. This passage proves Paul was right about the Gospel being taken "first" to the Jews. Were all of the Israelites "partially" hardened in Romans 11, or were part hardened and another part were not hardened? The answer is found in the "remnant" of Romans 11:5. Paul reveals two different groups of Israelites in Romans 9:6-8. There is an Israel of the promise, and an Israel of the flesh. This is part of the context of Romans 11. Paul speaks about the "remnant" of Israel in Romans 9:27. This is also part of the context of Romans 11. Paul starts Romans 11 with two different groups of Israelites. In verse one Paul reveals he is still an Israelite, even after his conversion. Then Paul refers to two different groups of Israelites during the time of Elijah. There were the Baal worshippers, and there was the faithful "remnant". In verse five Paul says there is also a faithful "remnant" of Israelites during his time. This must be the Israelites who have accepted Christ, as on the Day of Pentecost. Paul uses the two olive trees as a symbol of the New Covenant Church made up of believing Israelites, and believing Gentiles grafted together into the same tree. The unbelieving Israelites have been broken off but can be grafted back in through faith in Christ in verses 23-24. Verse 26 is the problem for many modern Christians. What does the verse actually say, and how is it changed by many in the modern Church. I have heard two of our nations famous preachers say the following. "And then all Israel will be saved..." I have heard another say the following. "And all Israel will be saved..." What does God's Word, recorded by the Apostle Paul actually say? Rom 11:26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: The English word "so" is translated from the Greek word "houto", which is an adverb of manner, instead of an adverb of timing. Some have changed the word from "so" to "then", in order to change the meaning of the verse. How will all of the "remnant" of Israel from Romans 9:27 be saved? The answer is found in the verses that precede verse 26 and are found below. Rom 11:23 And they also, if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in: for God is able to graff them in again. Rom 11:24 For if thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree? Paul quoted from the OT in referring to the Deliverer coming out of Sion to pay for sin. Did this happen at Calvary, or will Jesus die again for His people in the future? Rom 11:27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. Verse 28 can only be understood by looking at how Paul started the passage. He started with two different groups of Israelites and he ends the passage in the same way. There are two different groups of "they" in verse 28. One group of "they" reject Christ and are the enemies of God, and another group of "they" are the election which accept Christ through hearing the Gospel and faith. Rom 11:28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. Based on Luke 21:24b-28, the times of the Gentiles comes to fullness at the Second Coming of Christ. This agrees with what Paul said in Romans 1:16 about the Gospel going “first” to the Jews. .

@DerrickthePinecone 8 жыл бұрын

Paul, for THREE CHAPTERS, hammers it home (Romans 9, 10 and 11) that God is NOT finished with Israel! For anyone to think so, hasn't done their homework, in essence. The rise of Replacement Theology is a consequence of rejecting Pre-Millennialism, which is clearly laid out for us in the Biblical text. Again, Romans 9-11 is a CLEAR REFUTATION of Replacement Theology. Paul answers the errors by writing to the Christians in Rome. He writes in Romans 9:4-5 that to the Israelis alone: 4 … belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the Law, the worship, and the promises. 5 To the Israelis belong the patriarchs, and from them, the Messiah descended, who is God over all, the one who is forever blessed. Amen. In the postCrucifixion world of the first century, A.D., the Apostle Paul reminds us that God’s plan for Israel has never been abandoned. Paul informs us in Romans 9:6-8: 6 Now it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all Israelis truly belong to Israel, 7 and not all of Abraham’s descendants are his true descendants. On the contrary, “It is through Isaac that descendants will be named for you.” 8 That is, it is not merely the children born through natural descent who were regarded as God’s children, but it is the children born through the promise who were regarded as descendants. His comments in Romans 9:7 that "not all of Abraham's descendants are his true descendants" serve as a reminder that there is more to being Jewish than merely being a descendant of Abraham. It will be this truth that forms the basis for the salvation of the non-Jews to whom Paul directed the majority of his evangelistic efforts. Paul also reminds us that God is righteous to take this posture with respect to belief in him. In Romans 9:14-16, he writes: 14 What can we say, then? God is not unrighteous, is he? Of course not! 15 For he says to Moses, "I will be merciful to the person I want to be merciful to, and I will be kind to the person I want to be kind to." 16 Therefore, God’s choice does not depend on a person’s will or effort, but on God himself, who shows mercy. God’s willingness to base salvation on the requirement to believe stands opposed to being related to Abraham. In Romans 9:23-26, the Apostle Paul asks the following not-so-rhetorical question: Can't he also reveal his glorious riches to the objects of his mercy that he has prepared ahead of time for glory- including us, whom he also called, not only from the Jews but from the gentiles as well? As the Scripture says in Hosea, “Those who are not my people I will call my people, and the one who was not loved I will call my loved one. In the very place where it was told them, ‘You are not my people,’ they will be called children of the living God.”

@jpcl223 8 жыл бұрын

+Artifact1812 terrible refutation, truly. You haven't provided anything of worth.

@tonymuse 7 жыл бұрын

Pre-Millennialism NEEDS to be rejected, it is a joke. And so is the idea that believing Gentiles are of the same commonwealth as believing Jews.

@pbksocial 6 жыл бұрын

@Derrick Tyson Paul also hammers home in Romans 1-3 that simply being born as a Jew doesn't save you, in fact Jews who knew the law and oracles of God in the first century Roman world were castigated by Paul for knowing the law, teaching it to Gentiles, and not keeping it themselves. (Rom 2:1). If you claim Pre-Millennialism is clearly laid out in the Bible, I would love to see where. Romans 9-11 shows that there were Jews of Paul's day that had rejected Jesus as Christ, and thus they were broken off the olive tree of God's blessing. Dispensationalists try to say the entire nation of Israel was cut off. Nonsense. There were still branches left on the tree, because Gentiles were grafted in AMONG them (Rom 11:17 ). What Paul is saying is that the death and resurrection of Jesus was Israel's national salvation plan and God still yearned for Jews to come into the plan. Paul himself was heartbroken over his fellow Jews that had rejected Jesus (Rom 9:1-5, Rom 10:1). Paul even says that IF these Jews do not "remain in unbelief", God will put them back in. Derrick, why did Paul word it that way? Rom 11:23 And they also, ***if they abide not still in unbelief, shall be graffed in***: for God is able to graff them in again. Rom 11:23 clearly and explicitly states that any Jews of Paul's day were to repent and change their minds about Jesus, and accept Him as Christ, they would be saved. Grafted back into the tree with their Jewish brothers (and new Gentile brothers) who had already accepted Jesus. Romans 11 says nothing - zero - about any "national plan" for ethnic Jews to be saved in a different manner, sometime in the distant future, after being beaten and slaughtered by God for 7 years!

@imago9059 Жыл бұрын

Romans 11:24 explains it all For if you were cut from what is by nature a wild olive tree, and grafted, contrary to nature, into a cultivated olive tree, how much more will these, the natural branches, be grafted back into their own olive tree.

@lamp-stand7 8 жыл бұрын

The term, "Replacement theology" is clearly a Red Herring as the Church (the body of Christ) is clearly the "Mt. Zion" of prophecy (see Heb. 12:22-23) "But you are come unto Mt Zion . . the HEAVENLY Jerusalem . . the the general assembly and CHURCH of the Firstborn . ." To the extent a Jew after-the-flesh thinks himself anything by virtue of his own flesh, he sadly errs.

@55k3v1n 4 жыл бұрын

Paul, a Jew was telling this to both Jewish and Gentile believers. Seems you make the mistake of making the "you" Gentiles in Heb. 12:22-23. Hebrews is an epistle especially written to the Jewish Christians. Most of it contains things Gentiles wouldn't even understand at the time.

@lamp-stand7 4 жыл бұрын

@@55k3v1n Are you saying Mt. Zion does not refer to the church?

@55k3v1n 4 жыл бұрын

@@lamp-stand7 You mean the Mt. Zion in heaven. Remember the church will include the OT (mostly Hebrew) saints redeemed by Jesus, Jews who accepted him as Messiah when he came as a man, as well as Gentile believers. That is the church. In the latter days the unbelieving Jews will come to see Jesus as their Messiah and will also become part of the Church (Zech. 12:10-11). This means God is not finished with the Jews. Many Jews have received him as the Messiah in the last 50 years

@lamp-stand7 4 жыл бұрын

@@55k3v1n I believe you are correct. Many Evangelicals misconstrue the scripture to emphasize ethnicity and follow after Christian Zionism. I think this is something Dr. Brown stumbles over.

@55k3v1n 4 жыл бұрын

@@lamp-stand7 I think we are commanded to pray for Jerusalem. I met up with this Jewish girl I know and told her I became a Christian. She proceeded to tell me that one night she woke up and heard a voice saying "Rowena go home." I immediately replied "To Israel right?", to which she stunningly replied "How did you know???"

@TheTurtlee1 8 жыл бұрын

The problem is the Jews are NOT Israel, Dr. Brown. The Jews are one or at most two of the TWELVE tribes of Israel. Israel is also NOT that little strip of dirt in the near east. God will regather ALL the 12 tribes of Israel, but the problem is who knows who the people of the other 10 tribes are? Anyhow, the point is that gentiles are "grafted" into holy Israel, not replacing it.

@daved3713 8 жыл бұрын

Jews are part of Israel as Paul says " For I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin." Paul refers to himself as an Israelite. The point of the The Land is that it is promised to them.

@TheTurtlee1 8 жыл бұрын

dave d Indeed, the Jews are part of Israel, but are NOT all of it. And Jews will not be saved apart from Jesus, as I hear many Christian Zionists say. All who are saved are in Jesus Christ, as messiah.

@daved3713 8 жыл бұрын

TheTurtlee1 But History is part of Natural Revelation, in that History happens in the Natural world. History testifies to the hand of God upon the Jews, as their history is one of scattering and return, scattering and return, and exile. Country after country have kicked them out, only to find them return after time. Paul still refers to them as "God's People" in Romans 11 "has God rejected *His People*, he answers in the negative.

@TheTurtlee1 8 жыл бұрын

dave d But Israel is not the Jews! The Jews are only part of it! That's why prophecy of Jeremiah and Israel, for examples, say specifically Israel AND Judah. Isa_11:12 And He will lift up a standard for the nations And assemble the banished ones of Israel, And will gather the dispersed of Judah From the four corners of the earth. Jer_3:8 "And I saw that for all the adulteries of faithless Israel, I had sent her away and given her a writ of divorce, yet her treacherous sister Judah did not fear; but she went and was a harlot also. Jer_3:11 And the LORD said to me, "Faithless Israel has proved herself more righteous than treacherous Judah. Jer_31:27 "Behold, days are coming," declares the LORD, "when I will sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man and with the seed of beast. Jer_31:31 "Behold, days are coming," declares the LORD, "when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah, Two separate entities brought together as one under Jesus Christ.

@daved3713 8 жыл бұрын

TheTurtlee1 Israel is the physical offspring which includes the Jews. The Jews are not "totally Israel" but they are "fully Israel" its like saying Jesus is fully God but not "totally" if he was "Totally God" then he would be the Father--which is false. Israel is not the Church, that is a separate thing. The Jews are FULLY ISRAEL but not the Totality of It.

@e.m.8094 4 ай бұрын

Do you have a book or a longer teaching on this Dr. Brown?

@LFTV 4 ай бұрын

From the Line of Fire team: We encourage you to read Dr. Brown's book Our Hands Are Stained with Blood (2019 edition); you can follow it up with his book Christian Antisemitism.

@pbksocial 6 жыл бұрын

When Jews get saved, do they join the church? When Paul, Peter, James, John etc were saved did they join the church?

@codyreitsma2184 7 жыл бұрын

I really appreciate Dr. Brown's insights as usual. But he himself says here that "a remnant of Israel/an Israel within Israel" is saved; doesn't a "remnant," by very definition, mean a "portion", or "not all"? That is to say, even within the tradition of the Jewish law, it is only those Jews who are faithful to God and his law who are not condemned, correct? If "all Jews are saved" automatically, then why were many of them destroyed in the desert due to unfaithfulness? Is not a covenant a two-way street? Is not faith the end-all-be-all? Of course I could be wrong here, but when I read Paul's words that the Jews have an advantage due to their reception of the actual words of God, I take that to mean not that the physical Jews are automatically saved, but they were appointed by God to maintain his word until all who are faithful (both in their nation and in others) throughout all time could be justified through pure grace. They have an advantage in the sense that God used them as the vessel through which he would demonstrate and declare his eternal purpose for all of his faithful. Also, which part of God's promise to Abraham explicitly says that all physical Jews are automatically saved in an eternal sense due simply to heritage? Wasn't the promise simply that Abraham's descendants would "be a great nation" and also that "all nations would be blessed through him?" The nation of Israel was indeed made great, and it was through their physical lineage that the Messiah came and thereby all nations can be blessed through him. Of course all Jews who believe in Jesus are saved and so there is no favoritism, but does "be made a great nation" really imply that every single member of the blood line is eternally saved, or was it more of a statement that the nation of Israel was the foundation upon which spiritual Israel would be planted?

@tonymuse 7 жыл бұрын

Well done Cody, not too many people get that.

@Kman. 7 жыл бұрын

CODY...A "portion" of Israel *will be saved* . God cuts no slack for them...if they're saved, they will come to the truth just as you or I...by trusting in the finished work of Christ.

@valleyadventfellowship525 4 жыл бұрын

Cody Reitsma Amen! In Romans 9 Paul goes to great lengths to show that the true “Israel” of God have always been the “faithful”, the “believers”. Even within the Hebrew nation there have always been two Israels: those according to the flesh (literal, through genealogy) and those according to the promise (believers in God’s promise to save). Ishmael and Issac were BOTH descendants of Abraham, yet the promised Messiah would come through Isaac. Why? Because God said so. Ishmael represents trusting in one’s works and Isaac represents trusting in God’s Grace. The OT promises made to Israel were ALWAYS and ONLY directed to the faithful, not to the entire nation. So those who were “scattered” were backslidden believers. Those regathered are also backslidden believers. Those believers existed within a nation made up of both faithful and unfaithful. It is nothing to God which literal genealogy a person may claim; He is no respecter of persons. “If he be Christ’s then are he Abraham’s seed and heirs according to the promise” Gal 3:29. “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” Romans 2:28, 29. Christians are Jews, “Israel” in the true meaning of those names. Jacob’s parents gave him his name. But God gave him the name Israel. So, Israel is a “spiritual name” that God applies wherever He chooses. He applies it to unbelieving Jews, believing Jews, believing Gentiles.....and even Jesus! In Matthew 2:15 an OT quote is revealed to be a prophecy about Christ. Yet, the original prophecy calls God’s son “Israel”! This is all important to know in order to correctly interpret Romans 9-11.

@SpotterVideo 2 жыл бұрын

@pbksocial 6 жыл бұрын

The remnant Jewish believers in Galatians 6:16 .... are part of the church. The entire "replacement theology" argument is a STRAWMAN. People don't like the term because it isn't TRUE. We could make the same argument against you....that you REPLACE Jesus and His work on the cross with the Jews and their own method of salvation.

@Marah493 Жыл бұрын

If the church replaced Israel, then why isn’t the church subject to the same curses of Deuteronomy 28:68 just like scattered Israelites??????

@sunnydayz8747 Жыл бұрын

Because the Law is for sinners , and made for sinners , we are all guilty ....the law was put in place to show us whats sin was , with out the Law we would not know what sin was. The Law will never go away , It is still here and we are to obey it and not sin , but we are saved from the Law because Jesus fulfilled the Law for us...is that to say now we can sin ? Never! We cannot live in sin...we are saved through the grace of Jesus Christ from the Law. If you do not accept Jesus Christ you are still under the Law and subject to the Law's curses....Hope that makes sense.

@BenR.Emmaus 13 күн бұрын

Because of the Cross.

@Juliet04738 Жыл бұрын

The original recipients of the promise were GRANTED that promise in JESUS, as one of their 'own'... & because of this, the Jewish people were/ are taken INTO THE HEARTS of Christians.

@TogelTr Жыл бұрын

Lord Jesus said: Mt 21:43 Therefore I tell you, the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a people producing its fruits. I think this speaks for itself.. the Church has been the people bearing the fruits for the Kingdom of God, 'replacing' Israel's ROLE! This has been true for almost 2000 years. On the other hand, God's dealing with Israel is His own business, not our, Gentile believers', business, let alone saying that we are now them!

@prince1warrior243 8 жыл бұрын

NT is not the gospel of Israel but of the Israel of God ...it means the spiritual Israel like Abraham's seed ( Gal.3:16).

@Tangle2Brook 8 жыл бұрын

Dr Brown, you explain your position very well. I am going to listen to this several more times.

@vnhg 8 жыл бұрын

how can I contact you for a question on this?

@robliano9497 4 жыл бұрын

If he says the people have been "switched", so its "replacement " theology,then he must believe that the very people who were scattered must be the ones who are regathered. But they cant cuz their dead. So he says its ethnic Jews of the future. So even he believes it's a "switch". Therefore based on his own logic and definitions, he's a "replacement" theology person as well.

@randybray1661 3 жыл бұрын

There is a continuation of Israel from generation to generation

@robliano9497 3 жыл бұрын

@@randybray1661 Of course there is but Dr. Browns arguement was it is suppose to be the exact same people who were scattered that are regathered.

@Anthony-1701 8 жыл бұрын

You Believe God is done with Israel then you don't know the Bible.

@DerrickthePinecone 8 жыл бұрын

Amen to that! Paul, HIMSELF, hammers home for three chapters in the Book of Romans, that God is NOT finished with Israel (Romans 9-11). In fact, the whole purpose of the Tribulation Period is where God goes back to dealing with Israel once again--the Church is not mentioned in Revelation after Chapter 4, verse 1, which speaks for itself. A deep, detailed, intense study of who the '24 Elders' represent will also give one insight and understanding of The Church and Israel, because it's evident and conspicuous enough that the 24 Elders represent The Church (The Body of Christ).

@zachary1077 8 жыл бұрын

+Moreno James Revelation does not even have the name "Israel" once! Except when describing New Jerusalem. Revelation has nothing to do with Israel.

@TheTurtlee1 8 жыл бұрын

Yeah, Jerusalem is called "sodom and Egypt". God will judge it.

@zachary1077 8 жыл бұрын

TheTurtlee1 Where is Jerusalem called Sodom and Egypt?

@Anthony-1701 8 жыл бұрын

Sword of the LORD for some reason your comment is labeled as spam from what I see.

@aldixon1977 7 жыл бұрын

Dr. Brown: How come you never respond to questions your viewers are asking you ? Please explain...

@LFTV 7 жыл бұрын

From the AskDrBrown team: Our ministry receives tens of thousands of social media comments and questions every month, so it's impossible to respond via social media. However, questions can be sent to www.askdrbrown.org or you can call his radio show, especially on Fridays, when random questions can be asked. Thanks for viewing the videos here.

@hippiegypsygirl 3 жыл бұрын

I still don’t get it... I don’t believe Israel was cut off and won’t be grafted back in, I believe that the church and Israel are now equal. They will be regathered but they don’t get a separate fate, we are all apart of the same tree and grafted in. One in the same because Israel failed God we were grafted in and get the same rewards now

@wilkoswilkos4027 8 жыл бұрын

Are the ages of people in the Genesis literal or metaphorical?

@samuelmithran5586 2 жыл бұрын

Literal

@BenR.Emmaus 13 күн бұрын

Literal, Genesis should be understand as a "Worldview molder " that means we take our view of the world from Genesis 1-11, even if you do not take it literally.

@greglindstrom2733 8 жыл бұрын

Question: the two made ONE, what two and who? 12. And you were, at that time, without the Mashiyach; and were aliens from the Devarim of Israel; and strangers to the covenant of the promise; and were without hope and without Elohim in the world. 13. But now, by Y'shua the Mashiyach, you who before were afar off, have been brought near by the blood of the Mashiyach. 14. He is himself our peace, who has made the two (become) one, and has demolished

@elijahrose7913 Жыл бұрын

Thank you

@jamesthelesser6975 8 жыл бұрын

To deny that the "true Israel" will be saved dispite their unbelief is to call God a liar and deny the scriptures. Jeremiah 31: 31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. 35 Thus saith the LORD, which giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the stars for a light by night, which divideth the sea when the waves thereof roar; The LORD of hosts is his name: 36 If those ordinances depart from before me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a nation before me for ever. 37 Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD. Romans 11: 25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in. 26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob: 27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins. 28 As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes. 29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance. 30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief: 31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy. 32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all. Revelation 7: 2 And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea, 3 Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of our God in their foreheads. 4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel. 5 Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand. 6 Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand. 7 Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand. 8 Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand. Revelation 14: 1 And I looked, and, lo, a Lamb stood on the mount Sion, and with him an hundred forty and four thousand, having his Father's name written in their foreheads.