Has the Rolex Daytona Been Left Behind? | Watchfinder & Co.

[@watchfinder]

If you want to see the Patek Philippe calibre compared to an Omega Speedmaster's, check out our side-by-side video here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kIWco6mqodCSr8U

[@mrluvit8232]

beautiful pieces

[@franzjager9931]

Maybe the best watch channel at all. There is hardly anything out there to match "Watchfinders" style, knowledge and appreciation for timepieces. Thanks a lot for all the great content!!

[@TheRj1986]

It’s named Tim Mosso from Watchbox. He is the walking watch encyclopedia. Still love this channel though !

[@stefanvanoss4344]

Franz Jäger you forget the pontif, the guru, the gouverneurs gouverneur. AC3 archy luxury

[@WrongTimeWatch]

stefan van oss no way

[@bigchiponmyshoulder7573]

+stefan van oss Tosser!

[@swampgumpharpy7977]

stefan van oss, Don't be silly.

[@Dave-ks1ye]

This is an unfair comparison. One watch has heritage, technical superiority and innovation, the other just has a crown on the dial.

[@Kostja81]

@Richard Westwood if you buy your watch as an investment and not because you want to use the watch. Then i agree with you go with Rolex and make money.

[@stationplaza4631]

Excellent video, as always....The man who narrates these videos does it so well in fact, he could sell to the Devil himself barbecue kits!

[@watchfinder]

Thanks very much!

[@brunoschoelkopf9174]

Thats, in fact, true! This guy is smart as fuck. His voice so sweet and humble that he could tell you "you are going to die in seven days" and it still would sound like "amazing grace" to you!!!

[@orion8829]

*micro lense panning over a spatula* “And the grill 3000 takes its intricate complications to a whole new level”

[@vinoypoppady9315]

That’s absolutely true.

[@EastMontana1]

Decades ago when I asked my father why Omega and not a Rolex he said: Omega will always be superior to Rolex. Time will tell ..... He never owned a Rolex but his Omega was with him until the end.

[@adityasanthanam1945]

My grandfather had an Omega Constellation he bought in the 50's and kept it until he died, but my uncle lost it. Great watch, better than the Rolex his friend owned. People think Rolex is best because of their great marketing and overpricing, but Omega was and still is better.

[@ESW206]

Aditya Santhanam my great aunt had a Rolex in the 40s, but her uncle lost it. Great watch, much better than omega. People think omega is better because of people named Aditya and bc James Bond wore and bc if it’s great marketing, but the Rolex is just a better watch.

[@Sevyne77-777]

@@ESW206 disapprove!

[@jimmyjay122]

Erick W Rolex was never, the final word in quality or aesthetics. It has become what it is today through successful marketing and branding strategies. And let’s not forget the high demand generated by the nouveau riche who have almost no idea what they’re buying save for the name and logo which they so desperately want on their wrists. I wouldn’t wear it if it was gifted to me primarily because I find it’s appearance boring, cheesy and even unpleasant at times. With their boxy cases and narrow, almost feminine, bracelets.

[@ESW206]

jimmyjay122 tldnr

[@michaelwilliams5506]

i have a grey side of the Moon, and wear it every single day to work where I'm a locksmith. it gets dusty, knocked around, and shocked, but it still looks absolutely brand new with no marks on it. on top of that amazing durability, it's drop dead gorgeous. it can be dressed up for more formal occasions, or dressed down and casual depending on the strap. Omega is killing it right now.

[@Geniusclicks]

Michael Williams I love the fact that is so low profile that you can’t be worried about being robbed for it. Very stealth like feel to it

[@michaelwilliams5506]

Geniusclicks absolutely! but mine is still insured. hehe

[@JohnOffroader1999]

Is it a lightweight watch?, do you feel comfortable wearing it? By the way good choice.

[@jamhoor2144]

can you get a stainless steel or titanium strap for the grey side of the moon to match the face? then I would definitely buy as i prefer a metal strap

[@Lukas-kh5gu]

@@jamhoor2144 are you absolutely sure about that? Have you had in on your wrist? The leather is SO COMFORTABLE and it suits the design of the ceramic bezel so much better than any metal strap could in my opinion. Also, by going with a metal strap, you kind of contradict the advantage of the lightweight bezel weight.

[@Atombender]

Think about it, the most innovative thing about the current Rolex is its ceramic bezel.

[@ikirikchi]

The most innovative is Sky-Dweller

[@Sandouras]

But it's hard to get and that's what rich people care about. Do you think rich fuck No. 20281839 cares about the movement, heritage, etc?

[@HackettLai]

No, is their price

[@ronniep9272]

Yes but Rolex were the first mainstream company to use ceramic bezels and now all companies that make sports watches use them. It was a big innovation.

[@TrendyStone]

The 70 hour power reserve is nice.

[@ChiTownTx]

Omega has a lot of good things going for it lately. However their biggest problem when compared to Rolex is the fact that Omega is a master of diluting its own brand. They have pumped out so many different limited editions of the Speedmaster that it makes something like the Dark Side of the Moon seem irrelevant. Not because the Dark Side isn't a great watch with many milestones achieved but because to the average consumer it comes off as "just another Speedy Pro clone". Until Omega learns to be more reserved with their offerings and stop whoring out their various lines of watches to "limited editions" they will never be viewed as equal to Rolex.

[@nawaal4452]

ChiTownTx You sir, have put my thoughts into words!

[@ralfybaby]

There is only one Speedmaster and that is the Pro with the hesalite lens. All the rest are Speedmasters but in name

[@Quicksilver_Cookie]

But why would you want Omega to be viewed as "equal" to Rolex? Then car salesmen, golf players, pimps, and rappers would wear Omegas. That would be a reputation disaster Oo I still feel like Omega tries to balance their attempts at being more popular and appealing to enthusiasts pretty well.

[@Milofchg]

They come up with limited editions so that they can keep the Speedmaster Moonwatch as is. True as close as it can to the original. If it's not broke don't fix it. Omega knows some people will get board of it, and marketing can go so far before people just don't notice. This where the limited editions come in. Omega changed things up every year to two. Original Omega Moodwatch owners will be drawn to buy the limited editions, collectors will always collect limited rare watches, and people who want something different but want Omega.... It's a win win for Omega and everyone. Since they don't have Rolex marketing (Hollywood, luxury sporting event sponsorship). Omega has the resources to change and upgrade their product. Rolex relies on holding back, keeping production/manufacturing a top secret, "the best watches" mentality of non-watch consumers, plus the reputation of being expensive and only for the wealthy. Rolex (as a owner of a few Rolex watches) IMO and my experience Rolex is not as accurate as it claims to be. Yes Rolex are tough watches, they are timeless classics. Yes Rolex holds it value really well, as long as you sell on Ebay or as a private sale (never sell back to an AD or pawn shop). However, for all the fame and hype Rolex has, it does not live up to it. It only lives up to the stigma of a rich mans watch. Which it never was before the mid 80's. Rolex like Omega were tool watches with a few luxury references mixed in with the sport watches. I am a fan of both. I'm a Date Just/Explorer guy, but don't care for Omega dress watches. I'll take a Submariner over a Seamaster any day. I'll take a Speedmaster over a Daytona ANYDAY. I'll take vintage Omega over vintage Rolex because Omega has so much more to offer and you can find working vintage pieces at reasonable prices.

[@roybatty4687]

@@ralfybaby snob

[@7Keninho]

I wish Omega doesn't have so many editions but their creativity and willingness to try is admirable. I saw the DSOTM at a boutique a couple of weeks ago and was impressed by the lack of weight and the work they were able to do with the ceramic. Just a great watch. Perhaps Omega and other brands have already surpassed Rolex and we just don't know it. Branding, marketing and consumer tastes, like anything else in life, can slowly creep up on the general population and before you know it, all it takes is one expert to say something like Omega > Rolex and the tide changes.

[@DicksonPau96]

Quentinho King How do u like the size of the DSOTM?

[@pilchtastic]

I love the look of the Grey Side of the Moon that Omega makes. This black one is cool but seems like it would be difficult to read in poor light conditions.

[@drhombus242]

I think omega definitely has a chance at beating Rolex at their own game in the future. They are setting themselves up nicely, and the fact that we are even comparing omega and Rolex is a testament to the work that omega has put in

[@domnoya4130]

The average person doesn’t even know omega. Rolex is known to every person on the planet. Rolex has brand recognition that nobody will ever surpass ever. When you think of expensive watch the average person thinks Rolex. That will take something massive to change. Right now omega just isn’t in pop culture like AP Rolex and patek are. Omega is a low end enthusiast brand right now. AP in particular I think has gained massive main stream recognition recently. Omega just doesn’t have that high end sexy image that other brands do. It for sure sells to enthusiasts but not the average person with money.

[@olivermann5026]

@@domnoya4130 omega has a 70% brand recognition. Rolex has a 96%. Not hard to change. Especially when you can buy a omega upfront and not have to wait 2 years.

[@GabrielTan1980]

David the fact that you are celebrating the comparison of Omega and Rolex, shows how far Rolex has left Omega behind. The two brands were considered equal or in fact Omega was better. Speedys outsell Daytonas considerably back in the 60s.

[@Kostja81]

@@domnoya4130 i was about to write a longer response to you comment but it wouldn't do any good. Rolex is good at one thing and that would be brainwashing people and advertising products... and that is about it. Regarding the recognition of Omega i do have to disappoint you, everybody that watches the Olympics knows the name Omega. All the best to you

[@danielhopkins2277]

@@olivermann5026 Yeah it's 70 % vs 96 %, BUT it's 70 % vs 96 %. So IT IS hard to change. It's in every part of our World... quality, vaccination, recognition, points in a test, etc.... until 80 % CAN be difficult, but it's not that difficult. The difficult part starts after that... Btw. the Brand recognition and that you can buy a Omega easier means not the people will buy it....

[@jakerose677]

As much as I love Omega with all of my heart, I think it would be quite difficult to knock Rolex off of it's pedestal. Rolex is ingrained into the minds of a lot of watch lovers or otherwise as the top dog, whether that be true or fiction.

[@louisbrandt5386]

@Jake Rose - I agree but it is fiction - “watch lovers” would go for the better history and watchmaking and choose Omega.

[@MusikPiratCH]

Well, I am Swiss and grew up in the 1970s where Omega (and Tissot) were almost synonymus for the Swiss watch industry. Omega was founded in the very same year as modern Switzerland (in 1848). In my mind Omega always was "above Rolex"! I don't care about the hype and therefore the non-availability of Rolex models in general. (Maybe Omega would suffer the same problem if their models were as asked as Rolex' models. Luckily Omega does not suffer this problem.) I'd chose Omega over Rolex like 007 (James Bond) since 1995 (Pierce Brosnan)! 😇

[@federhaus3224]

The new Omega Speedmaster Racing (44mm case) with the white dial is (for me) a Daytona killer. The dial has something like the texture from the Grand Seiko Snowflake to it, the tachy-bezel is a combination from ceramic and white enamel (filling for the engraved numbers) which gives it a stunning contrast. You get a date display and the case has a more interesting shape overall then the Oyster-Cases. I agree, that the daytona is (or maybe will ever be) the "hot watch", because it's harder to get and has the stronger history behind it then the modern co-axial Speedmasters. That's okay for me. At the end of the day, it's about the personal taste and from that point of view, the Daytona is a boring watch in my eyes.

[@dakadoodle]

Literally was looking at one yesterday. I use it had more water resistant and omegas water resistant pushers. But wow im really debating picking one up this week

[@hipboi894]

Omega was prominently few notches above rolex back then in 20 century. I still see no defeating point Rolex can claim over Omega other than bumped prices by people.

[@Ilestun]

The superior mechanism.

[@jamescollett2625]

Ilestun the master chronometer is better than Rolex’s movements which are also exceptional

[@navybound711]

Your videos make me really happy when a new one drops. Thank you!

[@watchfinder]

Thank you, and thanks for watching!

[@Ballad64]

The Omega is huge! They really need shrink the coax. Speedys down to 42mm imo. Also, would be great to see Omega come out with some ultra-thin options.

[@dimitristheodoropoulos580]

I believe that nowadays omega is the king 🔥

[@FV4030]

The DSoTM is a really wonderful piece but I feel the 'Black Black' was a little too much. Also, the day rappers start bragging, rapping and writing songs about Omega is the day I sell off my collection. I hope Omega stays comfortably where it is. Remember chaps, all that kid ever wanted was a Rollie Rollie.

[@Alexcann1]

The Omega all day long for me. Classy, understated and damned desirable. Beautiful watch.

[@garethVanDagger]

I have to say this is not just the best watch channel but the best KZbin channel. I watch all of your videos and never get bored. The production of the videos is perfect as well!

[@asad4310]

Omega is becoming a great example for modern luxury 👌🏽

[@edwardgroom5665]

Hi I would like to point out that the ceramic Omega is very brittle I have a dark side and so far it has been back to Omega 4 times. Cracked bezle once. (Drop of less than 12 inches) onto kitchen worktop Broken stop watch buttons twice. (Dropped at the gym soft floor) And cracked glass once.(tapped a door handle walking past a door) Omega replaced the buttons and bezle free of charge and said it should not happen but would not replace the glass even though it was a crack on the inside cost £700. It is a good looking watch but for every day wear I would not recommend to anyone. I have the Daytona also and wear it most days. Do a small drop test say 12inchs with both onto a hard surface and watch what happens.

[@Geniusclicks]

Next watch on the list... pound for pound better than the Dayton. I think people like the Daytona more because it’s hard to get. Its a top watch but the dark side of the moon is technically more advanced and looks more modern.

[@erikkalifornia5182]

I just picked up a Speedmaster Grey side... 8 years after originally released, brand new from my AD. It's still a proper chronograph that I feel has way more character than a Daytona, which are now going for 3-4 times MSRP. I was lucky enough to get my submariner at MSRP, but this Grey Side, is still special. Do you think we'll see Omega refresh the Dark Side of the Moon collection?

[@Prositon1]

I have just ordered the omega!

[@harrychowd]

This was one of the first videos i saw when researching watches in January and now I own both of these

[@MK-xl7mg]

Omega definitely make beautiful watches... The thing is with the Rolex... It hasn't changed much... Plus most of their watches have the same overall appearance, and same signature bezel... Which makes it boring how ever Omega models differ from each other alot which is why I would go for Omega

[@8AP1]

I have to go with Bruno here. At this price point, the Rolex is a no brainer. If however you've got money to burn and you don't care about resale, the Omega is a pretty innovative watch.

[@chrischong2127]

totally agree with strong supporting , the market tell the truth .

[@jaypp1127]

Bruno Schoelkopf well pointed out, but also Rolex is a registered charity. I dare say that would help greatly when it came to taxes and the like.

[@MK-xl7mg]

Bruno Schoelkopf this is why I don't like commenting on posts... I didn't even bother reading your reply since you called me a noob... It put me off from reading it... Firstly... It was my opinion I wasn't looking for any hate... If you prefer the Rolex then fine... But don't bring your hatred and name calling here

[@MK-xl7mg]

Perksie81 if you buying to resale its a different story... If your buying for keeps its also a different story... I don't understand Brunos hatred and name calling

[@SiddhantGoenka.Official]

This Omega is a beauty

[@Redbirdsfan1970]

Another great video. You guys are probably the best produced watch channel on KZbin. For me I'd say Rolex's spot at the top of the watch heap is largely due to perception. IMHO, they aren't any better than Omega despite what many would use to argue the point. I'm not knocking Rolex but I do think one day Omega will reclaim its spot at the top. Time will tell.

[@watchfinder]

Thanks very much! Some good observations.

[@midas1929]

Watches are always a matter of personal taste and these two are both great watches. For me the Daytona has only one thing still going strong for it, the value stability. Personally I like the Omega Grey Side of the Moon better and I also consider it to be the better watch.

[@supernovachampions]

Very analytical review, but as you noted - heritage seems to be key, albeit coupled with value. The Daytona’s evolution is akin to the Porsche 911. In 5 years that Daytona will increase in price whereas the Omega will be grossly discounted, despite its elaborate use of tech and design.

[@badlarry172]

best watch channel by miles

[@watchfinder]

Appreciated!

[@costasmandylor1565]

You are so right about the Daytona in 2005. I worked in a commercial real estate firm back in 2006/2007 and it seemed half the men in the office (including me) wore a Rolex Daytona.

[@postnick]

Don't get me wrong, I'm a huge fan of Omega... And that dark side is a technical amazement, but it's also ugly and hard to see. So the Daytona is the better of these two.

[@michaelwilliams5506]

Nick Post yeah, agreed. the other ceramic variants are better. my fav is the grey side of the Moon. i fell in love with it once i actually saw one... so i bought it.

[@brunoschoelkopf9174]

Just facts.

[@postnick]

Bruno Schoelkopf yea watches are all about the facts and not about the passion. I'd love either watch. Not a slam just a joke!

[@itnolongerexists2877]

I have that particular Omega watch. The watch I bought with efforts. You hurt my feelings

[@brunoschoelkopf9174]

Okay, I have to admit that both watches are very good. But it's still an unfair competition because the Rolex is such a strong enemy to compete with. I would'nt buy any of them because I have strict criteria on which watches I buy. For example, for me, the perfect luxury watch is mechanical, at least 200 meters water resistant, a fixed bezel would be perfect, the dial colour should be black, white, grey, red or silver and the watch should be made out of stainless steel. Keep it simple, robust, extravagant AND elegant as possible. When you're clothes are all black and you want to feel really cool, then the Omega fits perfect, imho, it is more a fashion thing. If you want a everyday luxury watch which is the ultimate, iconic chronograph, then...;-) Anyway, I love all watch geeks and freaks! Let's celebrate Baselworld 2018 together! Cheers.

[@jeanlefranc3817]

having recently traded a 214270 Explorer for a 2015 Seamaster 300, now enjoying all the mod cons (co-axial escapement, AR treatment, sea-through caseback), I wonder why it took me so long to buy an Omega.

[@dtm4trix]

Great video as usual. I love Omega and own 3 of their watches. And while I can appreciate Rolex and am in love with GMT Master II Batman, I could never see myself wear it. To me it’s ostentatious. I do like some Tudors, some handsome and affordable watches.

[@RandomUser20130101]

2:25 This is the key comment. "If mechanical watches were no longer needed, then they would have to be desired". That's the difference between Omega and Rolex. Omega can add all the latest technologies and materials, but a desirable watch is more than the sum of its parts. At the end of the day, Rolex is more desirable than Omega. That's a fact proven by resale value.

[@zaidhmoud100]

I’ve the Dytona but that Omega is epic as well, and I totally agree that the Dytona must have a clear back... I’m frustrated from not seeing that beauty at the back of my watch 💔💔

[@stewartnovinger102]

I bought both, WG Daytona and the original DSotM, love them both, the Rolex can be a little more dressy, the Omega on a fabric strap is a little more casual. Technically they are both great as far as the movements are concerned, it is nice to have both to wear to different occasions. Great video, really like your channel, very balanced on your critique, it can be hard to be a watch lover and not throw in your personal opinions on what you like vs being objective and giving a review without opinion. Nicely done.

[@watchfinder]

Interesting to hear an owner's perspective, thank you. These watches are so similar yet so different. Thanks for watching!

[@pas5294]

What I don’t like about Rolex now is that is just a piece of luxury and status. You wear one you are rich. What I liked about Rolex is that back then, it was a tool for time keeping, and followed many explorers achievers the military and it was the BEST of the best. Now what you get is just a watch you will wear for a bit and sell it for a higher price somehow. You go to a rolex store to buy a daytone they laugh at your face because they never have one although they should

[@davormatarugic2072]

They still tell the time lol

[@ivor1266]

I’ve watched a number of these videos now. It seems to me that the luxury watch market is becoming a two horse race between Omega and Rolex. Rolex are still some way ahead, but Omega are catching up fast. Is this true?

[@kessel12]

The Omega looks sweet, except for the part where it seems like it’s really hard to tell what time it is.

[@rickytestgames6085]

Who cares, watches nowadays are just a jewel and a status simbol

[@anthonynigelkendrick5474]

Omega Dark Side Of The Moon Black,Black is without question giving the buyer A head start over the ROLEX.

[@pinkyswear8233]

can you do a value proposition type of vid for the longines single column mono pusher chrono vs. something top end such as the patek 5370? thanks

[@danielchapman412]

I wonted a sub but got a Speedmaster & seamaster for the some money and did not have to wait a year or two

[@fpoynton1604]

Daniel - Those two pieces are so classic and beautiful - definitely a great choice over a single piece.

[@louisbrandt5386]

@Daniel - much better choice, I would do the same.

[@neilmartin7776]

Rolex is a marketing behemoth. There's no one better. They've marketed themselves as the global go-to luxury watch brand for anyone wanting to get into luxury watches, despite the fact that there are many brands out there (AP, Patek, Vacheron, Lange) who make far superior, far more exclusive luxury products, and many other brands (Omega, IWC, JLC) who make far superior, more technically advanced products than Rolex, for similar or less money. I admire Rolex, but I'm a very proud owner of several modern and vintage Omegas, and consider them technically and aesthetically better than anything Rolex produces. But that doesn't matter. Until other brands can do what Rolex does, the crown will remain on top. And personally, I hope they do because I want to be able to buy and own my watches without jumping through artificially created hoops like waiting lists, paying over the odds for grey market, or over the odds for basic materials like steel when other brands are experimenting with titanium, ceramic, carbon fibre, or luxury metals like gold.

[@shanecolon7054]

The weight of this watch is not nearly as heavy as I hoped for imgs.love/Rolexgraph I wear this on my right wrist and have my briefcase on my left. This is not too big of a deal, but I feel that if it weighed about as much as 1.5million in bills, a ki. (2.2lbs) of blow and my desert eagle .50 cal and the briefcase itself I would not be developing such a terrible lean. A lean is not such a bad thing in the gangster world but this is a bit too much.

[@skipmontesjr]

Unless you are a James Bond fan or you are into watches the Omega is like any other watch but anyone will recognize a Rolex...Brand recognition is so high with Rolex than any other watch on the planet....With that said I love my two Omegas and wear them more than either my Tudor Prince (A Daytona lesser) and my Submariner... No one except watch people say "Nice watch" when I wear the Omegas but I get compliments all the time on my Rolex's...

[@redastrachan8978]

Omega looks as if it were retrieved from a fire. Legibility be damned.

[@WALLY7714]

Such a pleasure to watch. Subscribed!

[@UXXV]

I like how you can actually tell the time on the Daytona. That said the ceramic is stunning and a date window is welcome. In Rolex's other camp the Tudor Fastrider Blackshield offers the best of both worlds, ceramic case, 150m water resistance, date window and around a third of the cost of a Daytona.

[@Jeff-mj1nl]

You guys are truly experts from every angle. What a beautiful and detailled comparison of two wonderful watches. :) By the way: Ceramic has a much higher hardness than steel but its fracture toughness is many times lower compared to steel. I would be a little bit scared while wearing the speedmaster...but its still an extraordinary watch :D

[@watchfinder]

Thanks for watching! Ceramic is brittle, but it still needs quite the impact to damage it. A steel watch wouldn't look too pretty either!

[@-JohnGalt-]

Thank you for the detailed description of modern ceramic. Fascinating material.

[@leeharding8306]

Both beautiful. A bit of a strange comparison as Rolex don’t make any modern watches and are the only company that could get away with such a dull range of watches. Rolex people always talk about resale value to the point of boredom. Omega do classic and modern watches and beautiful movements.

[@grilodan]

The main difference: you can walk into most Omega boutiques and walk away with one of these watches; you’ll wait a decade for the Daytona (and maybe never get one). Or you can go buy one for $20,000. It’s nuts.

[@itsthepens]

Utterly excellent content, interesting editorial slant and brilliantly narrated and presented. Please keep it up! Random aside: I wonder if the narrator was born in Essex, his accent reminds me of Alan Davies.

[@watchfinder]

Thank you very much, and thank you for watching! Alan Davies, er, the narrator has declined to comment

[@itsthepens]

😂

[@stevepabb]

For any watch fans this channel a must watch 👍

[@UdaishankarT]

I like the quality of the videos you guys produce, keep up the good work👍. Just wanted to know the name of the background score you use for the video🙂.

[@watchfinder]

Thanks very much! We don't have the info on the track any more unfortunately, got it a long while ago

[@andybob1001]

They are both beautiful watches and I understand and appreciate the Rolex heritage, but to me there is so much pretentiousness surrounding the brand I'd take an Omega. That's just my $.02

[@muskie0291]

Totally Agree!! I know many that almost automatically think D-Bag when they see someone wearing a Rolex, that's not my opinion but it does exist.

[@jras0522]

Damn, I love that Omega

[@francismarasiganiii4549]

What i like the most about the black black Moonwatch is that it's meant for a proper gentleman with a hooligan attitude. It looks great either when you're dressed up or even dressed down.

[@golfpark94]

Now that's what i call a tricky question; can Rolex ever be knocked of the top? Ten, maybe five years ago this woudnt be a difficult question, Rolex was and is still at it's top. Best design, best heritage, great movements, lots of people buy a Rolex for an achivement, something to celebrate. But branches like Omega are cathing up, with the Daniels Co Axial escapement the movement is as good as Rolex, the design is as good and more modern. I own two gmt's and one Speedmaster and seamaster 300 (Bond), as i said, this used to be a simple question, i really dont know. The more i get into watches the more i respect Rolex but Omega becomes a solid part of my collection so there must be something that's attracts me to them. Thank you for this fantastic video and this dilema; Rolex vs Omega, who is going to win?

[@stevemitchell7981]

I have owned Rolex and Omega. The Omega Speedmaster moon 1861 movement watch in my opinion is the most underrated watch on the market. If Rolex owned the right to the Speedmaster the price would be more than double. I won't buy Rolex anymore because the brand is overrated in today's market. The Omega 9300 coaxial movement is better than the Rolex 3135 and 4130 movement.

[@robertcristant6107]

Maybe it’s just me, but the one thing I cannot get my head around is that the Daytona does not have a date window. After all this time you would have thought they would figure it out. I suppose it is because they don’t have the room to fit their iconic cyclops date window on the watch. It’s one of the things that, in my opinion, is a detractor of the watch. I have become so accustomed to looking down at my watch for the date, that when I wear some of my vintage pieces without one, I feel a bit lost. The Daytona would be the perfect watch, if it could squeeze in a date window.

[@enriqueborunda]

Having now both watches in my collection, I can tell you that the Daytona wears more comfortably but the Dark side of the moon looks way better, light bounces off awesomely, a bit think to wear with formal shirts and jackets but both are incredible pieces.

[@theodoro89]

What camera gear do you use? This is one of the best 1080p videos I've seen on youtube.

[@watchfinder]

Thanks! We shoot with an Ursa Mini 4.6k, with tungsten through silk for lighting

[@johnmorrison8351]

I have a DSOTM and love it! Would very much like a Daytona some day too...

[@lanceboudreaux7157]

John Morrison DSOTM is a fantastic watch - congrats, I recently acquired a Panda, yes the bitch was expensive, but am going to enjoy nevertheless

[@ILoveBANFF1974]

Good points but seriously I will stick with Rolex and steel cases .

[@michaelwilliams5506]

LoveBANFF1974 why?

[@ILoveBANFF1974]

Michael Williams the same reasons I will only buy firearms made of metal . This is just my opinion and feeling.

[@simonfreeserve]

Another Great Watch Video keep up the good work

[@gfunkmoney06]

Grand Seiko Ceramic is also worthy of consideration. Just wish they made them a bit smaller.

[@liav6024]

thank you wf for this amazing review and i think omega does a better job than rolex in many ways first: omega make new models than rolex second: omega found a way to neutralize the magnetic filds that affects the watch accuracy which rolex does not(i know rolex has the parachrom escapment which does do a good job keeping the accuracy but its not enough for me)

[@tudorfanman2620]

Pointless video. Rolex = waiting lists. Omega = 30% discount and immediate delivery. No contest. Watchfinder must have a batch of Omegas for sale.

[@nikhilbansal8067]

Your videos are one of the best on youtube and i really enjoy watching the knowledge you shared with us. Also, your story telling is amazing😊 Now, I have a rado d star 200 and i have absolutely no idea how to use it. Please do a review on that please as it is a beautiful looking watch.

[@SM-wi1js]

Interesting video. Technology aside most collectors want what they can't have "easily". It's the hunt and not always the capture of the prey and in this case a SS Professional series from Rolex will always win over the great majority of other brands which as you articulated have much more to offer.

[@TManjen]

Excellent video AS ALWAYS!!

[@watchfinder]

Thanks!

[@billbuss7542]

What does the Omega retail for?

[@paulw1570]

Other watch channels please note the high quality of sound & picture of Watchfinder videos

[@mr.revmatch]

Such a bless to listen to! I like all the details you always give us. And like the history lessons you are giving us! Love the speedmaster! It is a beautiful timepiece, but I think it is not timeless where the daytona will last forever!

[@paulanthonyjohns]

This is a really excellent video. Thanks

[@clark3830]

I have both. In fact, I have over 20 Rolex and Omega watches. I actually like the Omegas much more than Rolex other than my Rolex Panda Newman and Rolex Air King.

[@toocoolforu]

The new Omega heritage line is gorgeous. Rolex is also gorgeous. It's healthy to have such competition. I own a Sub but would gladly buy a Seamaster next time.

[@Lukas-kh5gu]

love the description!

[@anthonynigelkendrick5474]

OMEGA ALL THE WAY. THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON BLACK ,BLACK IS A STUNNING TIME PIECE ANYONE WOULD LOVE TO OWN AND DESPLAY. GREAT REVIEWS GUYS.

[@xfan616]

only thing I concern about choosing one of these two is which one I can get on my wrist by the end of the day, actually prefer the dial on the grey side,

[@issamladdi]

Absolutly amazing presentation and comparaison !

[@fhhfgj]

Love your channel, at the point in my life where one of these watches are on my soon to purchase list. Thanks for your in depth reviews. Cheers!

[@essamalmasad5538]

I'm gonna BUY Omega The Dark Side of The moon !

[@selahvasari7664]

That Omega looks good!

[@neitherlink6612]

I think newer generations are far less forgiving towards underhanded tactics. A middle aged/old, rich man that is considering buying a Rolex, when surprised by the realization that he will have to be on a waiting list for two years, he will accept and wait, maybe even buy something to improve his spot. A young, rich guy who is considering to buy a Rolex when faced with this dilemma will politely refuse, go down the street, and buy an Omega. If Rolex continues with its dubious methods the will face unmeasurable repercussions.

[@y2ksierra]

I think Omega has some impressive offerings. The most impressive thing I've found is that if you want to actually see the model you're interested in, it's typically available in the boutique for viewing. As for the ceramic Daytona, I've sadly never seen one in the flesh as they are unobtainable. As a nice bonus, the Rolex stores typically laugh at you for even inquiring about one. Does it make me want one even more? Kinda.

[@iainmorrison9048]

So I lusted after a Daytona to compliment my Kermit (original lol) but balked at the markup. I also have a Seamaster and have also lusted after a Speedmaster. After weighing up movement, value for money, availability etc I ordered a Grey Side with meteorite dial, sedna gold with clasp strap. Arrived last week after a two month wait and I absolutely love it. Truly impressed and I can only see it growing on me even more with time . It's a keeper!

[@msbrownbeast]

The Omega is impossible to read the time dim light. No contrast between hands and dial

[@kostasp1137]

Honestly I do not see omega ever becoming Rolex but who knows. Rolex too focused on what they do and omega often proved they are not. It is matter of long term strategy. We will have to wait and see

[@tangchiprathomo819]

You can’t go wrong with both.

[@mikew742]

Between these two, Omega all day long....

[@markorombolakis6281]

To everyone who said, “ill take the omega” This guy puts them both in front of you and said, don’t worry about paying me. Take the one you want. You’re all grabbing the Rolex lol. Stop.

[@nicolorenz4464]

You have a point but I would only take the Rolex to sell it and buy the Omega.

[@Dave-ks1ye]

Id take the Rolex but only because the speedy would be too big for my wrist

[@rsr789]

People are only grabbing the Rolex to flip it, so they can then buy other watches.

[@DM-rc4yu]

@@rsr789 Yeah, that's the only reason. Not the iconic, classy design that doesn't try too hard.

[@Cityautolocksmith803]

I think the black black is unique. I love this watch great look and great movement.

[@Nexus.Achiles]

That Speedy looks nice but is unreadable. Ceramic might be scratch resistant but it's brittle, it will break if it hits a hard surface. Fora have quite a few documented horror stories showing photos with lugs being ripped appart after falling to the floor. Also, chips of ceramic were reported to come off in certain pressure points like behind the lugs for instance where the end links tend to apply considerable force against the lugs. I'm ok with ceramic on a bezel, not on an entire case. It's worth mentioning that the cost of replacing a broken Speedy ceramic case is about 7 thousands euros, ouch. I'll stick to steel, thank you very much. I can live with scratches, not with broken cases and lugs.

[@scottk1214]

Lack of legibility and thickness are dealbreakers with the Omega, despite the fact that it's a relative technical marvel.

[@msmc2728]

how do you read that Omega???