Hath not a Jew eyes? | The Merchant of Venice (2022) | Act 3 Scene 1 | Shakespeare's Globe

[@speedracer2841]

Marvellous!

[@paulleverton9569]

RIP Adrian Schiller. Gone far too soon at just 60 years old, 'a sudden and unexpected death'. He was one of those actors with a name the public didn't recognise (even if they all recognised his face) - but every actor knew who he was and they all admired him. He was an actors actor, and that's probably the best compliment any actor could receive. I was looking forward to another 15 - 20 years of watching him mature into deeper levels of greatness. Bit of a kick in the balls to learn of his passing.

[@alan8943]

I always think that this speech should be spoken with hidden rage. The anger within is going to burst at any moment.

[@AndrewUKLondon]

Very true. Though watching this again it's like he's speaking from behind a wall he's put up as a result of prejudice of insults. And as I watched it was like that suffering was starting to emerge from behind that wall. And the final line has the piercing thrust of anger.

[@jherrera3058]

I have seen it performed in that very manner you mentioned, I think this speech was meant to be passionate and rageful.

[@titusbec2462]

It's the speech of a villain who is rationalizing disproportionate revenge by blaming the victim and the victims kin. It's Golda Maier declaring that the Palestinians can be forgiven for killing Jewish children but cannot be forgiven for making Jews kill Palestinian children. You see the victim is always the victim. Only by being superior and hated for no reason whatsoever could you blame the parents while murdering their children. So the hidden rage is the rage of having not enough power to do as you please and having to explain yourself to inferior people, having to pretend to follow the moral code of the inferior, having to appeal to some sort of sameness because the inferior is more powerful. The hidden rage is hidden by contempt and false meekness. That's how it should be played. In my opinion

[@rsr789]

@@titusbec2462 Your willfully ignorant opinion about an area of the world you know nothing about, a history you know nothing about, and a situation you know nothing about is as good as asking a dead troglodyte about quantum superposition. Facts don't care about your feelings.

[@barak9966]

Best performance I've seen of the monologue. Hidden rage is more powerful and more frightening

[@nevadak3424]

Indeed ! Wonderful performance! I would have played it in anger! Its much better seething that way !!

[@byzantineemperor6459]

My favourite quote! Explains many things during the entire human history.

[@ruvindrasathsarani6064]

this is a sentence I often use when I teach Shakespeare every semester. It's almost like Shakes predicted the fate of the entire human race

[@Forever_young_1992]

The boldest, most powerful dialogues of Shylock I ever heard. Marvellous!

[@chiarajackson97]

Adrian Schiller was an interesting character in the beautiful series Victoria, and now he's one of the most complex characters created by Shakespeare in one of Shakespeare's greatest masterpieces!

[@georgesotiriou7051]

The word dimensions is something only Shakespeare could come up with. Spectacular word choice

[@FergusFromwalking]

1:51 The villany you teach me I will execute, and it shall go hard but I will better the instruction.

[@debasmitamishra1863]

Expressions, emotions sharp on point.

[@generalesdeath5836]

My favorite play.

[@samosullivan1744]

Best rendition of this iconic speech. EVER!

[@stuartclarke8044]

I think you should search out Al Pacinos same speech to compare. This, to me, comes across as apologetic.

[@samosullivan1744]

@@stuartclarke8044 Al Pacino was amazing, but to me he went a bit too hard on the fury. Schiller really lets the verse sing as well as conveying his own emotion.

[@braddonovan1786]

Pacino was better

[@Jack44M]

@@samosullivan1744 Pacino (Shylock) had every reason to be hard on the fury. Pacino's performance was epic. What caught me by surprise was Lynn Collins' performance as Portia. She was brilliant

[@AantonioT]

Excellent performance 👍

[@ExBeeOne]

amazing!

[@ianmason2964]

I never really liked this play until I saw this version. It was amazing and the venue was stunning

[@HamnimationStudios]

This is the best Shylock seen so far!

[@shibutho2000]

What about Al Pacino’s monologue as Shylock?

[@HamnimationStudios]

@@shibutho2000 Have to see it, thanks!😁

[@enochporch]

by what rationale of cinema is this shot handheld

[@TW-mc9wk]

Powerful stuff

[@EyeLean5280]

Very nice!

[@romaparshan5346]

Lovely

[@Zingoo_]

its so cold, you can't see the pain. That's maybe something is hard to grasp.

[@wafan13]

Why not start from the beginning?

[@olatejuonasanya249]

The best rendition of this beautiful speech was done by Al pacino the legend ,he captured the emotion and made it real this rendition did not bring to life the spirit and intent even though I know they feel they should change the aggression but they are wrong long live Al pacino the best shylock of all time

[@YeomanLocksly]

I wonder how many ppl play Shylock without knowing it's loosly based on a real person. St. Anthony of Padova encountered a skeptical Jew named Guillard. It was actually Antonio who said "usurers are like thorns who prick us to bleed." Perhaps Shakespeare gives this line to the Jewish character to remind us of Christ the Jewish Carpenter who shed his blood. Most actors do (or should) make a gesture to prick their hand when saying that line.

[@midnightwind8067]

This is very good. Most I have seen are too heavy on some accent and over flowering of Shakespeare. And barked out so fast that it is impossible to follow. But this suffers from none of that. Thank you.

[@SA-gf3th]

Sir this a Wendy's.

[@herminiasumanghid3317]

...Eyes. ,jew hands organs dimensions, senses, affections, passions,..feed with the same food, hurt with the same weapon. Subject with the same diseases. Heal with the same means. Warm and cooled by the same summer and winter as a christian is! If you prick us do we not bled. If you tickle us do we not like. And if you wrong us shall we not revenge.

[@Felix-ld3hn]

the camera is way too shaky

[@josephjoebrown11]

Interesting, ive never heard this speech delivered in this way. As if Shylock is almost genuinely asking. More exasperated and questioning than vengeful or noble.

[@SabioTalmudico]

Hath not a jew eyes? 🌹🌺🌻

[@herminiasumanghid3317]

Al pacino delivers it well

[@muhammadzailani7313]

This is very good but Al Pacino's will always be the one to beat.

[@kipo1456]

Globe Player is pretty much the only woke thing that I like, outside the occasional art movie. Nice work.

[@Uhhbyeee]

Do you even know what woke means?

[@JazzyGinger1]

Hello🐧🐧🐧🐕🐶, 🐦 God the Father loves you so much that He sent Holy and Sinless Jesus (His Holy Son) to earth to be born of a virgin. He grew up and died on a cross for our sins. He was in the tomb for 3 days, then Father God raised Jesus Christ (Y'shua) to Life! He appeared to people and went back to Heaven. We must receive Jesus sincerely to be God's childJohn 1:12. "But as many as received Him, to them He gave power to become the sons of God, even to them that BELIEVE on HIS name." That is great news! Will you sincerely receive Holy, Lord Jesus into your life today

[@mrh9635]

I prefer Pacinos interpretation. It has to be angry with doses of irony.

[@odd0odium]

where is the anger?

[@vegadog3053]

Look for it as resentment.

[@electricman68]

Bubbling underneath

[@CaffeinePanda]

Anger doesn't always manifest as loud rage. Shylock has endured abuse for years and years, growing bitter, resentful, hateful. Performing this speech as someone unloading a lifetime of pain to justify the cold, harsh retribution they seek seems perfectly appropriate to me. That being said, to me, this delivery of "I will better the instruction" is absolutely seething with fury.

[@herminiasumanghid3317]

Yup why revenge?

[@NM-qc2dh]

Shame it is not the original language for this is no better.

[@alexmontenegro9991]

I really don’t like this rendition. Shylock was super pissed and filled with a righteous fury when he said those words. This comes off as sort of sad and reluctant. I don’t think it fits the character at all and is, imho, played too dramatically for no reason.

[@panayiotiskyriacou5118]

Al pacino did it better

[@nazmulgani3776]

Frankly speaking...........I am not at all impressed. This actor has failed to express the complex Web of feelings and emotions, the deep philosophy and edge sharp rationality.........the anger, the grudge, the sorrow and the agony, an appeal to humanity, the insult and the hatred, the injustice and the discrimination, the deprivation and the alienation..........the prejudice and sound reasoning...................Shylock is a complex character, a villainous as well as a heroic character; a comic as well as a tragic character. There lies Shakespeare's OBJECTIVITY n GREATNESS......He is a TORMENTOR as well as a victim of torment.........

[@QuantumChance]

It's hard to top Pacino's reading isn't it

[@JazzyGinger1]

Hello, 🐦 God the Father loves you so much that He sent Holy and Sinless Jesus (His Holy Son) to earth to be born of a virgin.Then, to He grew up and died on a cross for our sins. He was in the tomb for 3 days, then Father God raised Holy and Sinless Jesus Christ (Y'shua) to Life! He appeared to people and went back to Heaven. We must receive Sinless Jesus sincerely to be God's childJohn 1:12. "But as many as received Him, to them He gave power to become the sons of God, even to them that BELIEVE on HIS name." That is great news! Will you sincerely receive Holy, Lord Jesus into your life today?

[@pvonberg]

Absolutely wrong way of doing this speech. This is the old cliche way of doing it, making Shylock a sweet old man. Wrong ! As well as boring.

[@drymant]

Wow, William Shakespeare is alive and well and has changed his name to Peter Von Berg. Thank you for oficially letting us know this is the wrong way of interpreting this speech. Actors and scholars have been struggling for centuries with how it should be done and how it should not be done. Make a note of it, folks, the author himself has finally given us some insight! Thank you, Peter. Or should I say, Will!! 😉

[@agenttheater5]

I heard quiet anger in this performance. And a lot of hurt. Lot of sadness. A 'what right do you have to treat me like you've treated me?'

[@ianmason2964]

You needed to see the whole performance, if you did and you feel the same way then, ok that’s your opinion. We all can have that

[@pvonberg]

@@ianmason2964 I respectfully disagree. A Shakespeare monologue, and performance thereof, should and can stand on its own. It is very possible to say - I didn't like his Hamlet, but he really delivered "To be or not to be " well. The opposite is also true - His "blow winds" was poor, but he was much better in other spots and I liked his Lear. Now this actor in Merchant might have been very good in the role, but I didn't care for this particular monologue, that's all I'm saying.

[@drymant]

@@pvonberg Absolutely. But respectfully, that is not what you said. You did not say "I didn't care for this particular monologue". You said it was flat out the "absolutely wrong way of doing this speech". Now personally, although the performance itself was perfectly fine, I did not care a great deal for this particular monologue either but I would never be so arrogant to declare it as "Wrong!" You and I, sir, are far from the ultimate authorities on the interpretation of Shakespeare. Just because you didn't care for it, certainly does not mean it is incorrect. The greatest thing about Shakespeare is that - as long as it holds true to the text and the story, and isn't completely off the wall ridiculous - there is no wrong way to interpret this play. This is why professional shows like this sell out every time and are being performed and vigorously discussed over 400 years later. Open your mind a little.