Hawking's black hole paradox explained - Fabio Pacucci

[@pogotheclown6088]

i love it when things we dont know shake the foundations of things we dont know

[@nelsonvenema3614]

Wasn't Pogo the clown the name of a serial killers alter ego?

[@jorgeanaya7621]

@@nelsonvenema3614 Yes, his real name was John Wayne Gacy.

[@pogotheclown6088]

I dont always know what google is, but when i dont ...

[@sebastiandevosi7043]

@@pogotheclown6088 wait what ?

[@CyberWorx]

shaking is not enough,we have to do it.

[@who1527]

This video taught me something and nothing at the same time.

[@JonatasAdoM]

Schrödinger's video.

[@fska9526]

me tooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

[@reemahdawod5275]

I I understood that I understand nothing nor does anybody

[@originalname7176]

Me tu understad

[@abhiramreddy2620]

Then you got it right, that is the correct way of understanding it

[@juparkjr1285]

Normal people: i see red apple Physicist: *a t o m*

[@PancakeTheKat]

My dad is a physicist and when I shared it with him, he actually understood it and he spent 45 minutes explaining it to me

[@jasmanpro]

@@PancakeTheKat oo cool

[@originalname7176]

@@PancakeTheKat You are so luky to have such a dad lol.

[@vornamenachname6549]

@@originalname7176 make ur kids later lucky

[@originalname7176]

@@vornamenachname6549 Pardon . Can you please repeat your text ?

[@joshuadickinson]

The strangest thing about this is the fact that we are able to communicate this wild idea to each other and feel like we have some kind of understanding of it, when it is just an idea...

[@ajinillias]

Exactly

[@jacobarchuleta6585]

Try to make sense out of it said by stephen hawking

[@shawnk8685]

humans have always grown from "communicating wild ideas". what's your point? at one point the computer youre on now was "just an idea"

[@IronicHavoc]

I mean there is actual formal definitions and math behind it. What you're watching is just a very surface level summary.

[@UltimateEntity]

@@ajinillias 😂q

[@antoniotalarico6093]

Please give the sound designer a raise. What he did here was beyond good.

[@keatodiet]

He

[@falcon5178]

i love this guy's voice

[@paandora]

Falcon Express i was thinking the same while watching the video 😂

[@kavyavijay4953]

Addison Anderson I think this guys name is

[@hazardeur]

Every day, I pray to god that AA won't ever leave Ted-Ed and will narrate every single video. For me, he's the voice of Ted-Ed and all the other narrator's, albeit good as well, don't compare

[@katarinajanoskova]

@@hazardeur Chris Anderson, the head of Ted has a gorgeous voice too. No relation as far as I know :D

[@anacsilva7812]

Me too 😀

[@in_99]

Well the beginning quote was horrifying 😂

[@christophermercaldi8616]

I remembered seeing part of it on the first Alien poster tho.

[@Yemmi]

666 replies

[@return_null]

Well the number of likes is terrifying

[@oreowithurea5018]

Then why are you laughing? You clearly don't have mind to use emotes

[@rantaroxlux2838]

if there's a hole there's a way -Hawkings 2020

[@cloeyay]

Imagine having enough brain cells to understand this

[@friedlemons5201]

Imagine having brain cells

[@Wakari_]

Imagine knowing what a brain cell is

[@sxlstzce]

Imagine having an imagination.

[@alexlu2]

.

[@risingraisings7012]

Imagine

[@canadianrage5224]

What if the quantum information being “erased” is still actually there, but us humans can’t see or prove its existence. For example, if we lived in a 2D world, we’d never be able to see objects in 3D. What if there’s realms beyond 3D that humans and technology are simply blind to.

[@betonhim]

Thats called God

[@jamshiddilmurodov4925]

@@betonhim Exactly

[@swaroopajit]

Well, this was a theory in the video, but yes, to your point there is a possibility of the information being stored in a way that we are unable to perceive, the same way we knew nothing about quantum physics less than a 100 years ago.

[@felix-gena6595]

@@betonhim This is science, don't put a god here lol

[@betonhim]

@@felix-gena6595 why not? I have an "opinion" just like the rest of u internet scientist lol

[@choppy2505]

I like the fact that although how complicated the topic is they will always keep the video within 5 min

[@dieselfreedom7938]

😂😂

[@გურიელი]

Finally, a place where I can dump my google search history without fearing the FBI.

[@queensaharaice7376]

😭🤣🤣

[@thelingx]

@@queensaharaice7376 Why are you crying?

[@thewatcherinthecloud]

The FBI would like to collect the information off of the 2D surface of your event horizon.

[@kartiksolanki5400]

FBI OPEN UP..!!!!!!

[@orbotik]

We already know it Kobe.

[@jiajitang]

4:45 the theory that the boundary of the observable universe encodes all the quantum information and the 3D objects are the projection of the boundary feels somewhat like Plato's allegory of the cave. This is fascinating!

[@larsschmidt2566]

Means earth is 2D (flat)

[@viet1514]

Uh oh

[@RyBrown]

Lars Schmidt lol no it doesn't

[@kaleomungin]

@@RyBrown w o o s h

[@kaleomungin]

@@C1ck3nSav10r Ry B = woosh

[@AJEETSINGH-nx9ll]

THE HOLOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLE COMPLETELY BLEW MY MIND.

[@potatobutroasted4308]

or,it turns your mind into a holograph

[@meltdown6856]

@@potatobutroasted4308 ohh yeah I agree WID u

[@josephlau13d77]

S-matrix vs $-matrix it makes sense for entropy bounds and AdS/CFT correspondence duality between hyperbolic space and conformal QFT which contain weakly coupled gravitons.

[@Kojakesh99]

@@josephlau13d77 sry bro we aint in hyperbolic space

[@marz9172]

I DO NOT LIKE IT

[@awbreis]

"What we know is a drop, what we don't know is an ocean." So basically, I've been living on droplets all of my life.

[@PutinJon21]

That's what's you know...

[@prudenciomangaoangiii403]

to make it worse that "droplet" gets "smaller" relative to the size of that "sae" every second for the rest of time

[@Regina-Phalange]

yet we still deny existance of God with such arrogance and surety!!

[@burningice1762]

@@Regina-Phalange and that's the shame the curiosity is giving us

[@richardhammond9757]

I'm a Non-English guy from India and I love how this guy explain the Whole thang... Even I'm able to grab all of the Thing that he is saying. Such a cool guy.

[@Nicks721]

The claim that everything is a hologram of the information contained in the surface of universe reminds me of Plato's theory of Ideas!!!

[@Rhobyn]

From my understanding Plato's ideas referred to discrete and fundamental categories, while the hologram theory does not. I think it doesn't even contain discrete objects. Not sure about Neo-Platonism or the physics themselves. I just know of holographic theory as very fringe, often somehow related to pseudo-scientific esoteric ideas.

[@Nicks721]

@@Rhobyn I don't mean of course that Plato's theory has any scientific value whatsoever. I only pointed out a vague similarity between these two theories.plato's theory is a more poetic structure and it doesn't satisfy in any way the modern scientific criteria and of course there are great differences between these two theories if examined carefully.i mean it's silly to compare them at all in a serious way. What we can say at most is that the human mind tends to think in a certain way. I mean , when a scientist collects all the necessary datas,he is free to form a theory, a picture of the world that satisfies these datas. And it seems that, while theoretically there may be innumerable theories that satisfy a certain amount of datas,men tend to create theories, pictures of the world, that are more familiar to a natural let's say way of thinking created by our more basic experiences. So it is possible that these theories, however subtle,may have similarities to " primitive" pictures of the world created by a grosser way of thinking and based on extremely more fundamental experiences. Well all these are not in any way definite conclusions and it is very possible that I myself would find them later unsatisfying. I feel that I express myself very badly 😅😅 but anyway,these are my two dimes 😂😂!!!

[@marcoaurelioa.4394]

@@Rhobyn It's pretty similar to the myth of Plato's cave though, and the Hindu's veil of Maya.

[@Leviathan123456]

Chess maniac do you have an Plato books you can recommend

[@Nicks721]

@@Leviathan123456 well,if you think that I am an expert in Plato,then you are completely wrong 😂😂. You can find everywhere revisions of Plato's books and you can decide for yourself which is more interesting. Generally , " Republic" is considered to be his best book, but it is quite large and hard for the beginning. If you want my opinion, " Symposium" and " Phaidrus" are great choices if this is the first time you read a book of Plato ( unfortunately, I don't know if you have already read any of his books and that's why I am writing you like this 😅). They are very charming books with great literary qualities, so if you don't find the philosophical meanings interesting,you will still be satisfied by the beauty of his writing. But both of them examine the subject of love,so if you are not interested in that subject ( and you are lucky if you are not 😂😂😂), then you can search for one of his books about a subject that concerns you. Finally,if you want a quick taste of his charm, I recommend you to read the last few pages ( I don't remember how many they are, let's say the last ten pages) of " Phaidon" ,where Socrates' death is described in a magnificent way.( I am not sure if I write the titles of his books correctly in English, but anyway you will find them easily)

[@sarveshsawant9564]

Making me wonder about things I didn't even knew before!

[@iamanidiot1418]

Exactly the same fore

[@iamanidiot1418]

For me*

[@amazingango9103]

yea

[@aanchalgajbhiye]

Know*

[@Queen-mc6fp]

Like you don’t say “knew” after “didn’t”?

[@miguelguerrero680]

Thanks TED I now live a paradox

[@himanshu7103]

i live in that for nearly a year and a half

[@sukhrobumirzakov8299]

It’s been about 2 years for me living in paradox . So confusing

[@rebeccali2707]

Scientists：*working hard to study the universe* Blackhole: I'm 'bout to end these guys' whole career

[@adrienabbet905]

@Doranzyò Valentijn Calling a meme "boomer" makes u a boomer. Sorry

[@pratyaksha6885]

lol actually building their careers

[@DefenestrateYourself]

Adrien Abbet Gatekeeping memes makes you a boomer. Sorry.

[@thunganang2249]

"Either way, this paradox has already helped us take another step into the unknown." Me: *screaming* Into the unknown ~ Into the unknown ~ INTO THE UNKNOWN ~~~

[@magatsukamisan3444]

Into the unknown

[@TheHiroClaw123]

me thinking it's an otgw reference

[@sanoberkazi1229]

Tammy evans your comment deserves more likes.

[@ovencake523]

into the unnnnNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GOD! NO GOD PLEASE NO!

[@hafssabenjelloun2409]

i was searching for this comment lmao

[@sujalgvs987]

I have an important chemistry test tomorrow and I'm here watching this.

[@ManishSharma-lm3wg]

Thats not important this is

[@Evivgemeren]

Good luck!

[@richard1113]

Good luck on your exam. But chemistry is across the hall and down the universe. This is physics.

[@randompheidoleminor3011]

Good luck. I also have my national finals - in about 2 hours or so.

[@HereComesVi_]

Ha. Ironically, I have to turn in a chemistry report. I feel you lol. Good luck!

[@urvashibalasubramaniam6785]

This is so beautifully animated, narrated and explained. TEDEd never ceases to amaze.

[@gauravmohanty2107]

Now i understood what Cooper meant by collecting quantam data when he was in the 4D bookshelf in interstellar.

[@fakhrurrozi-8814]

me too .. 😂

[@chadwick6710]

For me it's seems im gonna rewatch it everytime

[@finnvankoutrik7131]

What episode

[@ixchel3330]

@@finnvankoutrik7131 It's a movie?

[@voiceofneha7196]

@@ixchel3330 it's a show called the Big Bang theory

[@dabigbaby7193]

appreciate the pace of your talking. im not a native english speaker but i managed to understand this! this is what every youtuber should learn.

[@galaxydog2138]

"Holographic Projection" When he said that, I bit my lip and watched curiously as I moved my hand around in the air "that doesn't look like a hologram"

[@random.3665]

And how would a hologram tell that other holograms feel or dont feel like holograms, exactly?

[@黄苡]

Seriously, this guy explain with a clear sound and also in brief. Give you a like

[@rijuchaudhuri]

As a researcher and a supporter of the principle, I am so glad that the Holographic Principle is finally getting some recognitions recently! I was eagerly waiting for a video like this! Thank you!

[@alwaysdisputin9930]

Why does quantum info have to be conserved please? Because the guy gave zero reasons other than saying "it's not an arbitrary rule"

[@Selfmadehuman50]

@@alwaysdisputin9930 because even if the object is destroyed the information is still there in the universe.

[@arandombard1197]

@@Selfmadehuman50 And why must that be true?

[@regularheroguy999]

@@arandombard1197 If I may I will try my hand at explaining it. Generally this thought process comes from two theorems, the no-cloning and no-deleting theorems. As they sound, they state you cannot clone an unknown arbitrary quantum state, and if there is two copies of such a state, you cannot delete one without affecting the other. They both point to the conservation of quantum information. These of course have their own evidence and proof I won't go into, but it's very hard if possible to test them. But a theorem we have tested is called the no-hiding theorem. It states that even if information is missing from a system, it still exists out there. The experiment that was done in 2011 supports this so far. So until more information is learned, we will assume quantum information is conserved.

[@fatcat1082]

i sometimes wonder why i ever bother watching this type of ted videos when i cant even understand anything

[@confusedpanda9922]

I feel you...but l love things to watch which forces my brain to think.... especially where I need my own imagination

[@josephlau13d77]

The anti-de Sitter/conformal field theory correspondence, sometimes called Maldacena duality or gauge/gravity duality, is a conjectured relationship between two kinds of physical theories. On one side are anti-de Sitter spaces (AdS) which are used in theories of quantum gravity, formulated in terms of string theory or M-theory. On the other side of the correspondence are conformal field theories (CFT) which are quantum field theories, including theories similar to the Yang-Mills theories that describe elementary particles. Super yang-mills and n=8 supergravity might be key.

[@shriya6789]

Because you want to understand

[@sgr2864]

General curiosity

[@woodhonky3890]

@@josephlau13d77 allrighty then!

[@Chirag_Gupta5]

I love paradoxes and the way you explain is beyond explanation😂. TED is too good. Thank you so much

[@saloksingh7]

It's legit so peaceful hearing this guy talk.

[@sylvia452]

I love how I can just click on whatever video Ted Ed produces and enjoy it because I know it’s going to be good.

[@isabela.marino]

I watch Ted Eds when I'm stressed because they're quick but interesting and informational! It motivates me and I've grown to find Addison's voice reassuring.

[@Mtz2604]

it also distract your brain from the anxiety 😉

[@d.a.n.k7381]

This video just made me realize we know so little in this strange universe of ours

[@rumanaharif4776]

Your voice is so good and thank you for this information

[@tsb-hq3960]

I love how physicists are being paid to make their own lives harder by creating problems that don’t exist 😂

[@cz2301]

All too often i create problems that don’t exist and im not even paid

[@zachsuarez1830]

You mean physicists? Physicians are health practitioners. And a lot of this stuff is actually useful in real life

[@tsb-hq3960]

@@zachsuarez1830 ya I know, just jokes

[@lyricsassam]

Physicists* As a physics student myself, this hurts me😖, that you wrote it as physicians

[@tsb-hq3960]

@@lyricsassam lol my bad

[@statelyelms]

3:27: the apple has a face for one frame?

[@BillyEilish]

saw that too

[@Nippleless_Cage]

Same

[@himanshu7103]

yes ian

[@himanshu7103]

your name ian murdoch reminds me of harry potter

[@savyhendrixvideo]

this is the most mysterious part of the whole video

[@meirihareven5092]

I'm intentionally not gonna remember this.

[@sahinyasar9119]

ME TO

[@blankeyed67]

You have to face it. Face the truth that we will never truly understand the universe that surrounds us. It’s what all great philosophers do. It’s what Nietzche would’ve wanted you to do.

[@meirihareven5092]

@@blankeyed67 I'm obviously going to remember this.

[@AmritBedi47]

I SWEAR

[@salima.anwar1]

@@blankeyed67 yea that’s for philosophers but for physicians and mathematicians it is vital information for the conservation of the human civilisation

[@redaghassah7718]

I really love how simple yet explanatory this video is. In TEXD they always try to introduce complex concepts to people in an elegant way. It would be lovely to make a similar video about the firewall theory, and the hair and no-hair theorem.

[@MiracleNikki]

everything is so magnificent, they're covered with something that we dont know and we always attempt to solve it. those things make this life more interesting

[@gaminghardx]

Love these videos so calming and soothing! Watching at 1am

[@TheRandomizerYT]

TED ED: Hey check out this new and unique topic... Kurzgesart: _Am I a joke to you_ *Makes birdy sounds...*

[@samarmohan9891]

The Randomizer YT but this is much better and easier to understand

[@elhomo6406]

@@samarmohan9891 both have their merits. I'm personally more a fan of kurzgesagt

[@shweetaa]

I think both are just perfect !!

[@TheRandomizerYT]

@@shweetaa Yes, they are... But apart from tye fantastic Ted-Ed riddles, I personally prefer Kurtgeszagt.

[@shweetaa]

@@TheRandomizerYT Personal opinions but I respect them both :)

[@weckar]

If I remember my math correctly, the holographic projection theory makes a lot of sense. Any point in a space enclosed by a spheroid can be uniquely describes as the intersection of two lines perpendicular to that spheroid*. So, if the edge of the observable universe is shaped like a spheroid, the projection of information makes a strange amount of sense. *There can be multiple ways to describe the same point, in most cases infinitely many, but the combination of any two lines can only refer to one point.

[@rishabhsharma3213]

0.44 “to understand this paradox” is a paradox in itself

[@martinjanev1705]

Actually it's simple Answer Information go in Book if life-Liberybif God and guantom inf Proove RESUREKTION! :-)

[@onnimei57]

I listen to this channel when I go to sleep cause it’s so calming...

[@vedantsridhar8378]

I really love the nice way you animated Stephen Hawking :) That looks so cool

[@naveenraj2008eee]

Hi ted-ed Expected stephen hawking video from you.. Now happened... Another fantastic video with animation.. Thank you ted-ed..🙏

[@bbgm1337]

“What one doesn’t understand is what other knows”

[@greekkidshows9373]

Or thinks he knows

[@wirly-]

Or knows he thinks about what other think he knows they think.

[@tameimpalafan17]

The more we know, the more we fear. Huh.

[@arihantkumar6491]

All this adds so much more relevance to Lovecraft's works. The constant 'Into the Unknown' makes me realize that Lovecraftian horror truly is beyond any type of horror known to us.

[@astha...]

At first i was not interestedin physics and decided to quit but here you are to make me fall in love with physics over and over again. ❤❤❤

[@sawc.ma.bals.]

Ted Ed : uploads multiple videos after a short interval *[Everyone liked that]*

[@Scream_Lord]

"Reality is an illusion, the Universe is a hologram! Buy gold, BYE!"

[@jacksonstein809]

Screaming Meat Yess!

[@thewhizkid3937]

^ right lol Our universe May just be a computer simulation. Some claimed that as they dug deeper into the understand of [It], they found computer code. Bits of 1s and 0s //I self taught myself coding and...

[@lorekeeper685]

Cipher!

[@devzzy3340]

Screaming Meat let’s go bill

[@Exachad]

Aged like wine

[@efrenarevalo2025]

One thing I learned is that if you put the word Quantum to any sentence, it will make it sound awesome.

[@hafsasadiya7134]

Now that’s quantum-astic

[@LeanAndMean44]

Cool. The holographic principle is the first idea I’ve heard of which actually combines the simulation idea with physics, making it more of a hypothesis.

[@nunyabusnes2439]

what you did at the end almost got me

[@Wolfickle]

Aww man , That was So Dark!

[@Czechthisout24]

I love how we can come up with such theories; but can’t come up with solutions to war, hunger, disease, etc - I guess science will always be easier to understand and deal with.

[@pinkegg3179]

I don't have the brain power to have my mind blown by this video. I couldn't even understand enough to have an epiphany.

[@rebeccacascione2409]

It is so fascinating and essential to watch all these Ted - Ed videos, intended to educate us and to form our consciences. Moreover, listening to this guy's voice, who is so professional, accurate and impeccable, makes the whole experience much more gripping!

[@Daniel-kv4np]

I love the animation of this video! Great vid Ted-Ed, keep it up!

[@jesternamuag1511]

Why Did I even watched this, now I'm on the verge of having existential crisis. Ugh

[@angelhe8040]

Wait, if scientists manage to combine the two equations into one, the universe can be pretty much explained in one mathematical equation. Which means our universe is pretty like a computer code, that everything that exists is a running program made out of some sort of code, by something else. 🤔

[@thewhizkid3937]

Well coding is math

[@proloycodes]

@@thewhizkid3937 nope coding isn't math, it's more of an art, As a coder, who doesn't know much maths im pretty sure abt it

[@paulmahoney7619]

If the universe was made, who made the maker? And who made the maker’s maker? And so on?

[@osse1n]

Hawking - a man who never gave up He should've wrote a book on philosophy

[@iamablacksabbathsong9765]

How could he type or write if he's crippled and if someone were to write it for him, how long would they last before being annoyed by his emotionless robot voice

[@prasunadhikari6054]

written*

[@Timewalker13]

Imagine if Steven hawking did a romance audio book.

[@Kosaro1234]

@@iamablacksabbathsong9765 He wrote many books and papers while crippled. Even at the end of his life he had some motion in his face. A computer was developed for him that picked up his face twitches that he used to type. Everything he said he typed first.

[@astavas8341]

"Philosophy is dead"

[@ktn8329]

The thing is - hawking radiation is a theory, quantum equations were used and applied to general relativity. The very fact mentioned in the video of quantum and relativity being difficult to marry up is the reason Hawking radiation is a theory. It’s a great theory with a lot of backing behind it. It checks out, but let’s not forget it could very well get sidelined by a new understanding.

[@w8m4n]

Wasn't it confirmed in the picture they got?

[@ktn8329]

@@w8m4n hawking radiation cannot be visualized. What you are probably referring to is the accretion disk surrounding the BH in the picture. Accretion disks are interesting but they are not hawking radiation.

[@SumTsuiTechie]

01:28 is already fascinating and unheard of to me enough

[@prabhatmunda3078]

This is the first time I've been so early to a ted ed video

[@prangonpaul8067]

“It’s possible that reality as we know it is just a holographic projection of that information” what?!

[@notsosmart3288]

4:30 " Me after watching this video" "HmmMmmMmmMmmMmmMmmMmmmMmmMmmmMmmmMmmmMmmmmMmmMmMmmmMmmmMmmmMmmmMmmmmmmMmmmMmmmMmm"

[@midoahmed3159]

I'm addicted to this channel

[@MemesthanYoutube]

i am happy that i can understand this very easily!

[@giorgiagiaccherini6097]

I suggest to read "george's secret key to the universe" by Hawking himself; it explain this topic in a very simple and clear way.

[@sreejasrivaram8250]

i have read a brief history of time. A great book!!

[@muhammadhassnain718]

yeah , it is a good one :-)

[@jaykrishnak3268]

I read it too. For a 9th grader,it's a bit complex but by the 2nd time I read it, I understood most things. It's a nice book which almost anyone who has atleast passed high school will be able to understand without much effort

[@muhammadhassnain718]

@@jaykrishnak3268 yeah , It is great that you read it as a 9th grader , I read it while in High School.

[@AshwiniR.007]

@@jaykrishnak3268 try "astrophysics for people in a hurry" by neil degrasse Tyson. Blew my mind. Still halfway to go.

[@thewhizkid3937]

Right. It is such a good book

[@starcloak]

I'm in awe and also confounded at the same time😲🤔 still loved the video❤️

[@gwp4eva]

try this one on for size: when you’re done reading this sentence, look either to your left or to your right okay, good. so that means we live in a universe where you looked (insert direction here). which in turn means that the information of you looking the opposite direction does not exist. now, if all the information in the universe is finite, that would mean that you COULD NOT have looked the opposite direction. sure, you could do it now, but now is a completely different point in spacetime

[@whoamiialsodontknow3412]

This channel teaches me more then my school

[@geekacelol8982]

“Reality is an illusion, *the universe is a hologram*, buy gold, BYE!” Cipher really is all knowing

[@alex_zetsu]

I've heard about this several times, but I never understand why the Hawking radiation is assumed to not have the original information.

[@halfbloodprince2610]

It's almost like reading the brief history of time again

[@marceline227]

Nice video. I've learnt a lot from it.

[@girishnkabbernarayan1308]

I just love your channel 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩

[@Athaeus]

So how is that quantum information stored when matter is converted into energy? Does energy have a position, velocity and spin as well?

[@natasyadiyana6386]

Quantum is a packet of energy. It makes sense that quantum information must conserve.

[@jake2.035]

Never been so early to a video.

[@realeyes8199]

Me too

[@muhammadhassnain718]

same

[@thewhizkid3937]

#knowledge

[@pushkarnathshukla9405]

After this I wonder who ever made this universe is very genius.

[@yoondami1127]

As an observer and enthusiast, all I believe is that matter is not really made of quanta universally. It's when the string theory kind of can step in to explain the Hawking radiation but then again I need to study some more on it.

[@aryaraut3560]

this something which cannot be experienced (If experienced then cannot be shared)..... It's amazing to know about something like that....

[@chvhndrtntlr3482]

The title said it " explained" why I am become more confused than before....

[@alwaysdisputin9930]

He basically just said: "here's an arbitrary rule: info is conserved there's ZERO REASONS for it to be true. & then info gets destroyed. WHAT A PARADOX"

[@eltoast]

I’m hungry, I only ate a small portion of holographs today

[@dante_Karis]

Ok... Paused at 1:10 Me: the apple is red and round and shiny Quantum physicist: how many particles are there in each of the apples atom and their position and spin.. jeez what did I do wrong.. 🙅

[@Miloreo18]

kariuki dan nothing. But red and shiny and round doesn’t allow you to reconstruct the apple perfectly. But the quantum information - theoretically - allows for it.

[@balajideshmukh8005]

This Chanel teaches me more than my school

[@user-or7ji5hv8y]

This was excellent and accessible.

[@antarabhattacharjee2327]

A step INTO THE UNKOoOoWN Here i am still suffering from frozen fever

[@bidobi]

4:30 pewdiepie : hmmmmmmmmm

[@yayeetai9451]

No one: Elsa and ted Ed: INTO THE UNKNOWNNNNNN

[@dantesidorick7531]

I’ll need to rewatch this in a year or so when I have a better understanding of physics. This video is very interesting but I feel like I didn’t fully understand it

[@NullNoxproduction]

I enjoy these videos ♥️ and the videos are always insightful. 😃

[@dakshit04]

2days ago , my friend was asking about it . And now i got this video as recommendation . Conspiracy Theorist : Illuminati confirmed 🥺

[@thevlog6160]

How?

[@Kheops.]

Imagine something we never confirmed breaking everything we actually confirmed...

[@CivilDefenseEngineer]

5:15 why she only got one pant leg? hahahah

[@zohaib1537]

Its illuminati..

[@fodk7021]

XD

[@kavelate]

That's shadow

[@wyattmathers6260]

From what I remember, Hawking radiation is caused by the simultaneous creation of matter and antimatter, where one gets trapped behind the event horizon and the other doesn’t. Wouldn’t this mean that any annihilation of matter is a paradox or am I missing something?

[@ManuelPabloArnao]

Mind blown at 4:44