Dassault falconjet promotional video covering the following topics: coffin corner, control surface buzz, aileron snatch, gust flight envolope, shamelessly plugging dassault aircraft
Пікірлер: 95
@kukulkanlordofcas49313 жыл бұрын
This video really helped me fly my single engine piston better. Never again will I have a post-mach excursion.
@eloycolombo71252 жыл бұрын
🤣
@jerryfusilli81524 жыл бұрын
Cancel my gulfstream order please.
@jibeneyto918 жыл бұрын
17:40 - Awesome! That test pilot must have been knowing what he was doing! Brass balls rolling the plane like that at .97 Mach...
@antigen46 жыл бұрын
yeah but that's ground speed not air speed. they were at 520 kts - whereas mach 1 is 660 kts
@samstanfield26346 жыл бұрын
Mach number is mach number regardless whereas IAS varies with altitude. They were damn close to mach 1.
@v1_rotate6386 жыл бұрын
660 is at sea level, not at 430
@DrCash75 жыл бұрын
Totally worth it for the test flight at the end. Starts 17:22 but worth watching the entire sales pitch to see all that's at stake.
@brandonmiller46328 жыл бұрын
Great information and explanations of high altitude and high speed flight characteristics. The in-flight demo capped off an impressive video. Thank you!
@Flightstar7 жыл бұрын
I'm convinced, Im going with a Falcon. Now I just need to find a rich Uncle.
@HaydonHolcomb5 жыл бұрын
Let me know when you do and I’ll fly right seat!
@abhinavraj9323 жыл бұрын
I am going to send you a friend request on Facebook
@dmimcg5 жыл бұрын
Last week I was flying my Cessna 152. As I approached 560 mph, I noticed a little bit of buffet. I eased off on the throttle a bit back down to mach .88 and it was all good.
@wireflight4 жыл бұрын
Did the same in a Piper Cub with a STOL kit. Got a little hairy at the fringe, but 0.86 and below, it was smooth as glass. >XD>
@uropygid4 жыл бұрын
With a good fresh wax job, my 150 is smooth to M .94.
@itsumonihon4 жыл бұрын
i'm really dissatisfied with the Cessna 152 my flight school used. When I reached 540mph IAS i noticed that there was buffeting. even when i raised the flaps, it wouldn't exceed 550 without turning off the carb heat. time for a falcon bizjet upgrade i think.
@godfreypoon51484 жыл бұрын
I'm somewhat disappointed with my Nissan Versa. Just yesterday I experienced significant buffeting above 58 mph even with the windows raised, and and the passenger began performing a dutch roll.
@kerbalscuffedprogram47053 жыл бұрын
I brought my xr2 to an altitude of Mach 9.935
@heyitsvos7 жыл бұрын
Promotional or not, the test demonstration was pretty impressive.
@rodneysimpson48057 жыл бұрын
HeyItsVos I
@antigen46 жыл бұрын
except they were about 140 kts BELOW mach 1... nobody else caught that?
@petersnyder12414 жыл бұрын
This is a cheesy instructional video....ugh!
@a50204b1232 жыл бұрын
This is what u call a educational advertisement.
@christianpilon77258 жыл бұрын
Falcon is the roll-rocye of prive jet :))
@josephdupont5 жыл бұрын
I'll never forget seeing one of those falcons fly routine at the Morristown Airport New Jersey the man was amazing he actually did this approach and did a loop as it came out of the loop he threw out his Gary put out the flaps everything and just he's that thing in like it was nothing I had to I had to shake his hand I've never seen anything like it before or since
@mattfgln4 жыл бұрын
Was Gary ok after being thrown out of the plane ?
@MrFg19805 жыл бұрын
Impressive demonstration. Would like a 900EX...
@Lawiah05 жыл бұрын
"This is a completely different type of flying"; altogether.
@grlldfsh1238 жыл бұрын
"Coffin corner? Just not a problem in Falcon Jets" ... God's gift to aviation huh
@jeanlafitte2686 жыл бұрын
No one ever accused Marcel Dassault et Cie of modesty. Of course, their jets pretty much do what they're advertised to do.
@eloycolombo71252 жыл бұрын
Wow!
@michaelmitiszek15388 жыл бұрын
Falcons are nearly as robust as fighter jets. Great planes!
@rajathpai95735 жыл бұрын
obviously not, but what he meant was that their expertise from fighter jets translated into a robust jetliner
@nuclearwarhead93382 жыл бұрын
@@rajathpai9573 the keyword "nearly" didn't mean anything to you?
@patjohn7752 жыл бұрын
Look like he can’t read well
@t.w.35 жыл бұрын
RNoAF uses Falcon Jet 2000 for EW and Weasel missions as well as other "classified" stuff.
@AviationChannel4529 жыл бұрын
Incredible
@glassarthouse8 жыл бұрын
It's a Falcon promotional video, so not really shameless promotion is it? I mean, that is why they designed the video.
@richardturner21506 жыл бұрын
Right, time to buy a Falcon.
@PotholesInMyLawn9 жыл бұрын
Impressive
@CompetentSalesUSA4 жыл бұрын
Audio issues,
@truettneathery43585 жыл бұрын
How does this apply to commercial-size liners ??
@bradcrosier13325 жыл бұрын
The principles are the same, the majority of commercial airliners also have hydraulically actuated controls.
@intothewildexplore3 жыл бұрын
why the fuck there are still people putting thumbs down on a video like this??? what's the point??
@RehdClouhd4 жыл бұрын
Anyone know how stall speed and a.o.a. change at high altitude? And why..
@capncrunchdorf4 жыл бұрын
The density of air is significantly reduced at high altitude, so for a given airspeed and AOA there would be less lift, and hence a lower stall speed
@RehdClouhd4 жыл бұрын
@@capncrunchdorf it is a higher stall speed (KIAS/KCAS), correct? And lower a.o.a., but why?
@crohr10003 жыл бұрын
@@RehdClouhd yea higher stall speed. Because the air is lass dens. If you take a knife and try ti ggo through water at some aoa and try the same thing through air So imagine the water more density and air less dansity(high altitude) Thats why lower aoa can be used at high altitude
@jeanlafitte2686 жыл бұрын
This is pre- Cessna Citation X, isn't it? The tables don't compare Falcons to Citation X. And before you say it, yeah, Citation X needs yaw dampers and autopilot at the altitude and speed regime they hand-flew the Falcon at during demonstration.
@donc97514 жыл бұрын
The video looked like it was made in the 1980's! VHS qual....
@remf45194 жыл бұрын
Fab video!! I didn't know this about a Falcon. Time to get type rated. I calculated £11,000 in fuel from Dalian, China to Memphis - correct me if I'm wrong. (or maybe that was just Fairbanks)...?
@TheMkarr5 жыл бұрын
I'll take a bakers dozen Bob.
@0RespectMyAuthority09 жыл бұрын
I'll take 3
@snikxel8 жыл бұрын
nice demo ricing .97 mach
@jaimefabrega96355 жыл бұрын
Is the Citation X listed? Could not find it.
@ce-750pilot34 жыл бұрын
I don’t see it listed, because it has all the safeguards the Falcons do at high Mach speed.
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
The video was almost certainly made before the Citation X was available. The plane being flown in the video was first registered in 1978, the Citation X first flew in 1993. The video was likely made in the 80s.
@williamshafer31996 жыл бұрын
yeah i'm convinced. put me down for a fleet of 10, oops over-budget, discount for 7?
@lejink5 жыл бұрын
Can’t be crashed? Hold my beer, I got this
@Herr_Jehmineh5 жыл бұрын
Alright, I'll take all four!
@MegaFPVFlyer7 жыл бұрын
Huh! I never would have guessed an aircraft capable of M .85 would have an IAS limit as low as 370 knots.
@alexanderkamerbeek9693Ай бұрын
Oké as nobody seems to have taken the time in 8 years to explain de difference to you I still will so you can finally rest knowing the answer. Ias limit or Vmo is a structural speed due to air resistance especially at lower altitudes where a Mach crit or Mmo is a aerodynamic limit. So both limits have different outcomes where the Vmo can actually damage an air frame where Mmo can cause control issues.
@MegaFPVFlyerАй бұрын
@@alexanderkamerbeek9693 Thanks! In the time since I wrote that comment, I *kinda* figured it out, but you put it in a way that's much clearer :)
@mlasko745 жыл бұрын
Bitchin!😁
@gorflunk3 жыл бұрын
Others: 15 Falcon: 0 Kind of a morbid use of that analogy.
@justynkevlar30316 жыл бұрын
I live at mach 3.
@scottb7215 жыл бұрын
I shave with a Mach 3
@zamacabandb60177 жыл бұрын
Somebody help. The speed of sound depends on material or fluid density: the denser the material the higher the speed of sound (think putting your ear on a train track...). At sea level the air is denser and therefore the speed of sound is higher than at high altitude (any altitude) because the air pressure is less. Yet at 2:00 - and this is not the only youtube location where I find this stated (!), it is said that the speed of sound depends on temperature, and because the temperature is lower, so is the speed of sound. The opposite is true: the lower the temperature the higher the density, so the higher the speed of sound. At high altitudes the speed of sound is higher because of the lower air density (the temperature may have a negative but not linear.contribution, I am sure there are plentiful studies).
@turbofan4507 жыл бұрын
I think the temperature of the air at high altitudes has a less significant effect on the speed of sound when compared to the density of the air. The air up high is so thin that it would have to be much colder than what it is in reality, to make the speed of sound increase. So yes, colder air would normally mean faster sound speeds but the air is so thin that the cold temp is negligible...i think.
@mikenorman40015 жыл бұрын
The speed of sound in an ideal gas, and air is an ideal gas at the temperatures and pressures you are likely to encounter, is solely a function of temperature. That function is: a = sqrt(gamma x R x T), where a is the speed of sound, gamma is the ratio of specific heats (about 1.4 for air), R is the gas constant for air, and T is the temperature. R and gamma are constants, and T is the only variable. The remark , "the denser the material the higher the speed of sound" is the reverse of the actual state of things. Modeling a sound wave as an oscillation, temperature is the spring, and density is the mass, of the spring-mass system. For a given spring, a higher mass results in a lower frequency. (You'll probably find that your intuition has been shaped by things that are relatively more stiff than they are dense.) It happens that temperature modifies the gas properties in such a way that the net result is that the speed increases with T^1/2. Cheers!
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
The video is correct(it would be surprising if it was wrong, considering the source and nature of the video), altitude/density in itself is basically irrelevant. It's summarised quite nicely on the wikipedia page under a chart: "Density and pressure decrease smoothly with altitude, but temperature (red) does not. The speed of sound (blue) depends only on the complicated temperature variation at altitude and can be calculated from it since isolated density and pressure effects on the speed of sound cancel each other." - further detailed in the main article "pressure and density (also proportional to pressure) have equal but opposite effects on the speed of sound, and the two contributions cancel out exactly" It also shows and describes how "The speed of sound increases with height in two regions of the stratosphere and thermosphere, due to heating effects in these regions." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound#/media/File:Comparison_US_standard_atmosphere_1962.svg Comparing to railway tracks is different, as it's a different material, not the same material at different density/temperature. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound
@erictaylor54625 жыл бұрын
You controls freeze up, your plane buffets wildly, and you disintegrate. Not all that complex.
@MadaffacaFacca4 жыл бұрын
shut up and take my money Falcon
@tomdickens78563 жыл бұрын
I hear voices in the background.
@patjohn7752 жыл бұрын
You forgot to take your meds
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
Radio traffic at about 20:14, and occasionally another pilot, otherwise nothing.
@trainhopperz5 жыл бұрын
He said aileron snatch
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
It's the correct term, just because snatch can also mean something crude is kind of juvenile. Many words also have alternate crude meanings.
@rogerbivins91445 жыл бұрын
Cancel my SR-22 order please.
@karlplaysdrums2 жыл бұрын
No falcon aircraft has ever made a mistake, or distorted information. We are, for all practical definitions of the words, foolproof, and incapable of errer. Error.
@tree3565 жыл бұрын
Makes me miss today’s video technology.
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
It's a 240p upload, it would barely make any difference if the original was even shot on 35mm or 4k. Analog tv broadcasts were much clearer, and even an average VHS was better than this.
@12345fowler5 жыл бұрын
Give me a Falcon 10 plsssssss Nice toy
@importantjohn5 жыл бұрын
If it doesn't go over Mach 1 I'm not interested, sorry.
@AbdulRahman-px7sp8 жыл бұрын
no
@williamshafer31996 жыл бұрын
where U at with that Abdul?
@dlvox74154 жыл бұрын
This is old. All the gauges are analog.
@HEDGE10114 жыл бұрын
That doesn’t make the data invalid.
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
Transparently it's old, rather a pointless statement. It being 'old' makes little difference, a lot of aircraft still in use are also old anyway.
@josephliptak6 жыл бұрын
I'm not buying it, too risky
@feetgoaroundfullflapsC5 жыл бұрын
Im not buying you. You are full of shtt...
@jhutch14705 жыл бұрын
What a wonderful commercial for a certain aircraft. This was not for learning purposes at all. What a waste of time.
@mastrfreakincylinder19035 жыл бұрын
learning is always a subjective experience don't ya know
@DoubleMonoLR Жыл бұрын
Except that the information in the video is entirely accurate, 'what a waste of time'.