Amazing Lawyer skill.... Never saw such smart lawyer.
@writer_aksharjeevi6 ай бұрын
वकील साहब को जानकारी बहुत है और तर्क शक्ति अच्छी है। बहुत इंटेलीजेंट वकील हैं ये
@GamingBoy-gm6dxАй бұрын
Sabse badi dikkat ki jaj saab kisi ki sunna hi nhi chahte 😢
@nilkanthduttanilu88526 ай бұрын
Shadi sirf purus hi karte hai Aurat to bas Sari dunia chor kar apke ghar 125 or 498 ke lia aati hai
@Shalini74482 ай бұрын
@@nilkanthduttanilu8852dear men, B indepndnt, self depend,don't depnd on a wife that she will come in yr house and take care of yr family, bache, parents,....... Do househld chores, khud se cook krna or bachcho ko palna sikhiye, orat ye sb chize maa k pet se sikh k ni aati h, ghr m apni mother ko dekhte dekte hi sb seekh jati h ghr ghrsthi sambhalna or bachcho ko paalna....Or aap b to usi ghr me rehte h to fr aap Q nahi sikh paate,apni maa or bhen ko dekh k?, Qki bhot se divorce isi bat p hte h, ki tumne ye ni kia tumne vo ni kia, bachcho ko sahi se ni pala falana dikana,... Better to do it yourself........ Hm b to financially independent bn gyi h na??? To tum b bn jayo self dependent...... Asa krke tm apni ptni ki nazro me b uper uthoge izzat k sath........... Ghr m tumhari izzat hogi, samaj me izzat hogi tumhaari fir...
@sagarnaagar59742 ай бұрын
साथ में रहे तो मैं सब कुछ करुंगा अलग रहेगी तो तुम्हें मेंटेनेंस नहीं घर की जिम्मेदारी से भाग रही है कोई भी झूठे केस में मेंटेनेंस ना दे नहीं तो आने वाले समय में सभी पत्नियों धीरे धीरे मेंटेनेंस मांगेगी और अपने माइके जाके बैठ जाएगी और घर काम करने से भी बच्च जाएगी
@PushpaKumari-vl2it2 ай бұрын
पुरुष महिला से शादी करता है, और वह महिला क्या शादी नहीं करती है। गजब थेथरलॉजी है।
@PushpaKumari-vl2it2 ай бұрын
क्या पुरुष महिला का हाथ पैर, मुँह बांध कर शादी किया था।
@neerajmishramauganj2579Ай бұрын
Yehi sawal mahila se bhi hai
@prerna87Ай бұрын
Mahila shadi krti h tbhi to kisi ke ghar me Jake uske Ghar ke logo ko palti h ab kama ke bhi vahi khila de...to aadmi krega kya...ladki Padhi likhi ho ya anpad pahle usse Ghar sambhalne ki hi ummeed ki jati h....baad me drame krne se pahle hi aadmiyon ko bol dena chahiye vo nikkama h bivi ke liye kuch nhi krega..aise me ladki aise nikaamo se shadi se pahle hazar baar sochegi
@PushpaKumari-vl2it20 күн бұрын
@@prerna87 karnatka हाई कोर्ट का live देखिए। नागिन भी दुख देने वाले से बदला लेती है, लेकिन दुष्ट औरत दस शादी करती है और सभी पति पर 498a और 376 का मुकदमा करती है। लेकिन कोर्ट कोई सजा नहीं देती है। इस तरह से सच में पीड़ित महिला की आवाज को खत्म करती है। निर्दोष सभी दस परिवार को बर्बाद की है, उसकी कोई सजा नहीं।
@neerajmishramauganj257911 күн бұрын
@@prerna87 wah kitne achha sabd nikamma. Hmare parichay me kuch ladkiya hmesha city me rahi mba kiya but fir bhi job nhi mili. Mai village area me rha.mai Government job pr hu. To mere liye jin ladkiyon ko job nhi mili wo nikammi hn. Rah gyi kaam ka to mene naukar rakha hai. Aaj Ki ladki shah sasur ki seva to chahti nhi.Apne bachho ko bhi pal nhi pa rhi ek din wohi Shas banegi fir samjh aayega
@aainaatv58686 ай бұрын
कोई फर्क नहीं पड़ता औरत कमाती हो ये तब भी उसके पक्ष मे आर्डर करेंगे crpc 125 मे क्या लिखा है इन्हे कोई मतलब नहीं 101% आर्डर औरत के पक्ष मे ही होगा
@rishigoel713 ай бұрын
Who said this
@ArvinderSingh-o5s3 ай бұрын
Frk padhta hai mentince de mile ga patni ko aghr wo khud kama skti hai to
@nitin.shakyal3 ай бұрын
Bhedbhaav hai kanoon sab ke liye barabar hona chaiye
@officeprofile6148rituahlawat2 ай бұрын
@@nitin.shakyal kis baat ki brabri bhai aurat ko doyam darja hi mila hua h smaaz me kisi ko to nyaye mile
@dnyaneshwarpapal2 ай бұрын
@@officeprofile6148rituahlawat औरतं affair करे और husband बाहर कमाने जाये....lagal तरीके से maintenance चाहिए वाह क्या बात है
@brijeshsharma65993 ай бұрын
जज साहब को बहुत बहुत साधुवाद सच्चाई की तह तक जाने के लिए।
@PushpaKumari-vl2it2 ай бұрын
महिला को कब तक पालने की जिम्मेवारी है? महिला की कोई जिम्मेवारी नहीं??????
@Shalini74482 ай бұрын
@@PushpaKumari-vl2it dear men, B indepndnt, self depend,don't depnd on a wife that she will come in yr house and take care of yr family, bache, parents,....... Do househld chores, khud se cook krna or bachcho ko palna sikhiye, orat ye sb chize maa k pet se sikh k ni aati h, ghr m apni mother ko dekhte dekte hi sb seekh jati h ghr ghrsthi sambhalna or bachcho ko paalna....Or aap b to usi ghr me rehte h to fr aap Q nahi sikh paate,apni maa or bhen ko dekh k?, Qki bhot se divorce isi bat p hte h, ki tumne ye ni kia tumne vo ni kia, bachcho ko sahi se ni pala falana dikana,... Better to do it yourself........ Hm b to financially independent bn gyi h na??? To tum b bn jayo self dependent...... Asa krke tm apni ptni ki nazro me b uper uthoge izzat k sath........... Ghr m tumhari izzat hogi, samaj me izzat hogi tumhaari fir...
@srmlhss6 ай бұрын
Excellent arguments by vakil sahab.
@lalbahadurkaushik61972 ай бұрын
Pr koi fayeda nhi hone wala, judge ladki k favour m hi judgement dega...bakwas kanoon bana rkkhe hai...
@vijaymauka3 ай бұрын
पत्नी को जानवर नहीं है जो उसे पाला जाए जब पत्नी आदमी से ज्यादा काम आती है तो उसे भरण पोषण क्यों मिलना चाहिए
@Shalini74482 ай бұрын
@@vijaymauka dear men, B indepndnt, self depend,don't depnd on a wife that she will come in yr house and take care of yr family, bache, parents,....... Do househld chores, khud se cook krna or bachcho ko palna sikhiye, orat ye sb chize maa k pet se sikh k ni aati h, ghr m apni mother ko dekhte dekte hi sb seekh jati h ghr ghrsthi sambhalna or bachcho ko paalna....Or aap b to usi ghr me rehte h to fr aap Q nahi sikh paate,apni maa or bhen ko dekh k?, Qki bhot se divorce isi bat p hte h, ki tumne ye ni kia tmne vo ni kia, bachcho ko sahi se ni pala falana dikana,... Bettr to do it yrself........ Hm b to finncially indpndnt bn gyi h na??? To tm b bn jao self depndnt...... Asa krke tm apni ptni ki nazro me b uper uthoge.......... Ghr me Or samaj me izzat hogi tumhaari fir.... . Fr kl ko agr ptni chhod jaye to uski absence me khud se apna parivaar chala to loge........ Fr tumko kisi maa, bhen, p depend hone ki jarurat ni pdegi ki vo tumhare bachcho ko palegi aa k
@pragatirani48392 ай бұрын
Ha to jb patni janwar nhi hai to use marte Samy janwar ku samjhte hai pati
@Gandulal6899Ай бұрын
Kon Marta h didi ? Ky sabhi pti marte h ? Aapke papa or bhai bhi marte h ky 😂@@pragatirani4839
@prerna87Ай бұрын
Bulkul pr aadmi ko roti Bana ke aurat deti h uska ghar bacche vo sambhati h apne Sapno aur future ko ppeche rakh ke vo ye sb krti h ....aise nikkamo se to shadi krna hi murkhta h ..isiki saja mili isko
@Tr0ll78320 күн бұрын
@@prerna87to phir apne maa baap ya khud ko dosh do na apna Sapna kyo pura nahi kiya🤔 shadi 10 yrs ki age me to nahi hoti.
@Babirana8766 ай бұрын
Disagree with justice
@07dhiraj6 ай бұрын
Excellent efforts by lawyer 🎉🎉
@Advocate4314 ай бұрын
The Mr Justice is very hardworking,practical and knowledgeable judge.May God bless him so that he may impart Justice. 🙏
@wonderfulvideos9446 ай бұрын
जज का बेहद ही बेहूदा तर्क है कि पति ने शादी क्यों की , अब ये ज्ञानचंद ये बताए कि एक पुरुष ,महिला से शादी करता है या एक महिला , पुरुष से शादी करती है, या दोनो एक दूसरे से शादी करते हैं,
@abhishekganguly1236 ай бұрын
पहले थोड़ी इज्जत से, हाई कोर्ट का जज है और इतना पढ़ा लिखा तो आपके पूरे खानदान में नही होगा, उनका काम है कानून के हिसाब से फैसला देना किसी को गलत लगे या सही, बाकी वो कुछ भी बोले एक पार्टी को तो गलत लगेगा ही, अनस्किल्ड 5 लाख की गाड़ी में हाथ लगा के मिस्त्रियाई करता है पहली बार सुना, वैसे ये आपको समझ आएगी नही क्योंकि अगर गाड़ी होती तो कभी न कभी काम कराया होता और पता होता की खर्चा कितना लगता है दूसरी बात 5000 कमाने वाला हाई कोर्ट जा रहा है आप इतने बड़े ज्ञानचंद हो सकते हो जज नही। न खाता न बही वकील साहब जो कहे वही सही।
@wonderfulvideos9446 ай бұрын
@@abhishekganguly123 , महाशय, आप ज्यादा ज्ञानी दिखाई पडते हैं, तर्क पढा नहीं और लगे हीरो बनने, जबाव है कोई तर्क का ?पहले वो देखिए, रही लिखाई पढाई, वो आपकी समझ के बाहर है,
@abhishekganguly1236 ай бұрын
@@wonderfulvideos944 अरे भैया आप तो गुस्सा हो गए, तर्क और कुतर्क में थोड़ा सा अंतर है, जज का काम वकील के बातों में हां में हां मिलाना नही होता, जज की रिस्पेक्ट होनी चाहिए आपको उसकी बात पसंद हो या न हो, और ये वकील साहब केस हरवाने को तो तैयार बैठे है लड़की की शादी में एक पिता ने 8 लाख रुपए खर्च कर दिए तो उसे मेंटेनेंस नही मिलना चाहिए वाह तालिया घर में आपकी भी बहन बिटिया की शादी हुई होगी कितना खर्च होता है वकील साहब जज को समझा रहे की मैने कोई एक जजमेंट पढ़ा है पर क्या ये नही पता, बाकी एक हाई कोर्ट के जज की समझ मुझसे तो ज्यादा ही है, वकील साहब हाई कोर्ट में तो केस हार रहे, आप केस लेलेना सुप्रीम कोर्ट में।
@abhi.kaushik44955 ай бұрын
@@wonderfulvideos944correct bro ye sab law men's ke against hi bane hai yaha nyaay ki umeed nahi.
@ganeshbanerjee98413 ай бұрын
Correct
@DilipDU4 ай бұрын
Garib aadmi shadi na kare -Judge
@prerna87Ай бұрын
Nikaamo ko shadi kyu krni chahiye?
@savitrirai77742 ай бұрын
वकील साहब सही कह रहे हैं पत्नी कमाकर गुज़ारा करे
@RajeshPatra-c4v2 ай бұрын
Okil ka knowledge Kamal hai.I salute you sir.
@PushpaKumari-vl2it2 ай бұрын
21 वी सदी है, 18 वी सदी नहीं जज भैया। महिला साक्षर है, जज भैया।
@prerna87Ай бұрын
Mahila Padhi likhi kyu na ho pr koi bhi aurat dohra bojh nhi utha sakti ...aise me aadmi ko aurat ke ghar me aurat Jake uske aur uske pariwar ke liye kaam krna chiye...pr ye sb shadi ke pahle baat honi chiye
@suneetrainbow6 ай бұрын
11 मिनिट से सही pitch वकील साहब की
@kishansupportwithrajdeep48293 ай бұрын
जब महिला को पालने की जिम्मेदारी पुरुष की है तो महिलाओं को आरक्षण क्यों। भागीदारी क्यां।
@thecontrarycontrarian42302 ай бұрын
100% theek poocha aapne
@A-SS562 ай бұрын
@@kishansupportwithrajdeep4829 taki usko palne ki jrurat na mile… jis din empower ho jaegi us din ke baad ye maintenance b khatam ho jaegi
@sarojkumarnayak89082 ай бұрын
@@A-SS56 jo auratien already empower ho chuke hein , wo log phir bhi maintainance maang rahe hein. Pehle inko maintainance k liye rupaye dena band karna hoga. phir baad me baaki auraton ka dekha jaaega depending upon circumstances.
@Shalini74482 ай бұрын
@@kishansupportwithrajdeep4829dear men, B indepndnt, self depend,don't depnd on a wife that she will come in yr house and take care of yr family, bache, parents,....... Do househld chores, khud se cook krna or bachcho ko palna sikhiye, orat ye sb chize maa k pet se sikh k ni aati h, ghr m apni mother ko dekhte dekte hi sb seekh jati h ghr ghrsthi sambhalna or bachcho ko paalna....Or aap b to usi ghr me rehte h to fr aap Q nahi sikh paate,apni maa or bhen ko dekh k?, Qki bhot se divorce isi bat p hte h, ki tumne ye ni kia tumne vo ni kia, bachcho ko sahi se ni pala falana dikana,... Better to do it yourself........ Hm b to financially independent bn gyi h na??? To tum b bn jayo self dependent...... Asa krke tm apni ptni ki nazro me b uper uthoge izzat k sath........... Ghr m tumhari izzat hogi, samaj me izzat hogi tumhaari fir....... Fr divorce k bd kisi orat k sahare ki b tumko jarurat n hogi apne bachche paalne k liye or parivaar chalane k lia
@A-SS562 ай бұрын
@@sarojkumarnayak8908 haha.. beta wo laws janti h tabi toh le leti h, or empower koi krta ni h, har tareeke se koshish ki jati h ki wo ghar me bartan saaf krne wali e bani rahe. And jab dowry lete ho toh dhyan rakho agar wo wapis jaegi toh iska 5 times leke jaegi. Toh tameez se rahiye uske sath.
@NirmalKumar-cj7lh6 ай бұрын
कोई भी गाड़ी दो पहियों के बिना नहीं चलती, बजतीं हैं चूड़ियां दो हों हाथों में। पिता ने इतना रुपया बर्बाद कर दिया इतना रुपया में कोई भी रोजगार स्थापित किया जा सकता है।
@rishabhbharti17922 ай бұрын
India me sab chalaya jarha hai...mare hue admi ko jinda kar rhe yaha
@sunderlalsaini97583 ай бұрын
To judge sir .god bless you sir you are direct an angel.
@Parsotam-c3gАй бұрын
Agar patni galat fake case kare to use fansi kyon nahi di jati hai Pati ko saja milti hai patni ko nahi aisa kyo
@mahavirprasad5 ай бұрын
Very well argument by advocate sahab
@rajenderupadhyay19206 ай бұрын
Men don't divorce. Find solutions. It takes a lot of effort, intelligence and goodwill. But the end result is satisfying and highly beneficial to the children.
@dasmanik5 ай бұрын
Dil khus ho gya itna achha❤ lawyer dekh k🎉🎉 stereotype judge ki ghamand todh di😂 This judge is always biased to wife.
@akhileshjha2883 ай бұрын
Advocates is Excellent...
@peacheslobo-nm5xi2 ай бұрын
One of the best Lordship in India. Such men are rare in india
@PushpaKumari-vl2it2 ай бұрын
अक्सर लड़की का पिता विवाह प्रस्ताव लेकर लड़का का घर जाता है। या प्रेम प्रस्ताव लड़की करती है। विवाह के लिए लड़की ही दबाव डालती है। कानून की किताब में ये नहीं लिखा है तो जज साहब तो इसी धरती पर रहते हैं। पूछिये पहले विवाह प्रस्ताव किसने रखा था ? ऐसे ही कुछ भी बोल कर पाप कर्म का भागी क्यू बांटे हैं??
@priyashrma96062 ай бұрын
Sare ldke is bat k khilaf hn 😂
@prerna87Ай бұрын
Aakhir aise nitthale ko rishta mil kaise gya hoga vo bhi Padhi likhi ladki ka ...jadu tona kiya gya ya jhoot pheka gya
@suneetrainbow6 ай бұрын
जब वकील साहब ऐसी बहस करेंगे तो जज साहब को भी सही न्याय निर्णयन में परेशानी तो आएगी ही।
@PraveenSingh-ym4kn6 ай бұрын
क्या एडवोकेट आउट ऑफ़ फैक्ट चला जाये और अपनी बेज्जती करवा ले
@sunilgattani17503 ай бұрын
Nice argument by lawer
@TrueIndianTrueCitizen3 ай бұрын
ये सिर्फ वकील है या फिर खुद आरोपी भी है ? समझ में अभी आया.. 😳
@Gk-ry8rg2 ай бұрын
Aajkl ke buddhe judge hai dimag bacha nhi shadi kya aadmi karta hai or kya aadmi usse palne ke liye shadi karta hai padhi likhi to khud kama skti hai
@hardikzala98304 ай бұрын
Very good defence by advocate
@blissful_Life1116 ай бұрын
Shaadi ke time ladkewale agar ladki jyada padhi likhi ho toh bolte hain unhe housewife chahiye.. divorce ke time bolte hain ki ladki khud kamaaye ! Ladki ke bhai baap issi tension mein hote hain ki ladki ko job karne de ya nahi..
@roughwork-jz9lh6 ай бұрын
aurat MSC hoke bhi kaam nahi karna chahti, abled body to aurat bhi he....or section 125 ye to nahi kehta ki husband wife ko maintain kare, balki section 125 me spouse word likha he..or ishi base par kayi courts ne aurat se aadmi ko maintanence dilwaya he....par ye judge or bahut se or bhi judges ko ye baat samjh kyu nahi aati
@rajg45126 ай бұрын
As per my limited understanding…Judges ko sab samajh ata he but procedure ye he ki lawyer ko ye batana padega kis law me kon se Supreme Court ke order ke hisab se …yehi Lawyer ka kam he aur isi bat ke ache lawyer bahut charge karte he …Judge kisi ko favor nhi kar sakte …dono side ke lawyer ko proof karna he
@roughwork-jz9lh6 ай бұрын
@@rajg4512 but in this video judge said that we can drive conclusion based on supreme court judgement, but what I believe that judge should refer the law first because supreme court judgements also can be altered based on situation & time. If law section 125 clearly use word "spouse" then why even saying that - husband ne shadi kyu kiya agar maintain nahi kar sakta.
@rajg45126 ай бұрын
@@roughwork-jz9lh you are logically correct but sometimes there might be contradictory judgements available …that’s a tuff situation for anyone…you share one judgment opposite party will share other judgement…unfortunately things are not straightforward.
@roughwork-jz9lh6 ай бұрын
@@rajg4512 that's exactly is my point - why to refer judgements. Laws are already there, read the law & apply your wisdom based on evidences.
@rajenderupadhyay19206 ай бұрын
@@roughwork-jz9lhUnder Hindu marriage Act it is assumed that the husband is head and chiefly responsible for his family's well being including wife, children and his elderly parents. The purpose of any Law is to achieve justice but it can never address every conceivable human situation. Hence, the need of Judges to interpret the laws operation in a particular life situation.
@sushilkumari43482 ай бұрын
Itne saare mahila vieodhi comments dekhkar bahooooot achha lga.......bharat ka samaj bilkul shi ja rha hai......ladki ke mata pita ladki ko pal pos kar padha likhakar apni hasiyat ke anusar dahej dekar vida karte hein kyunki smaj ki reet hai ki ladki ko apna ghar chhodna chhod ke jana padta hai....ladke wale aadhe se jhooth bolte hein badha chadha kar apni family income btate hein taki unke pyare bete ko ek dulhan mil jae.....jaise hi milti hai..shadi ho jati hai fir pura pariwar rashan paninlekar us pr chadh jata hai....sas sasur nanad sab is koshish mein lag jate hein ki bahu bete ki aapas mein bne hi nhi. Or jab unme darar dalne mein safal ho jate hein tab unhe ghar se nikal dete hein ghar se bedakhal kr dete hein. Ab ladki fir ghar basana chahti hai bachhe ho jata hein. Jab jimmedari badhti hai to ladka bhag khada hota hai kyunki usne kam kabhi Kiya hi nhi. Ab ladki ghar bhi sambhalie bachhe bhi sambhale pati bhi sambhale and fir bhi ladka apne maa baap ke kahe anusar chalta Hain . Tab divorce baat chlti hai. Or wo puri atyachari family us masoom ka shikar krke usko use krke usko bahemr fenkne mein lag jati hai. Mughe samagh nhi aata smaj ke in logo ka chehra itna ghinona kyun hai or us pr turra yah ki mahila kama kr bhi lae. Kamati hai tab bhi use jeene nhi dete. Nhi kamati tab bhi nhi. Kitna achha hota yadi samaj mein ye prampra hi nhi hoti ki maa baap apne dil ko tukde ko shikariyon ke ghar bhejne pe majboor na hote. Jab ladki ka divorce hota hai to ladki ke sath uske maa baap bhi dukhi hote hein. But ladke or uske maa baap ko bas Aisa lagta hai ki naukrani chli gyi koi nhi or aa jaegi. Kitna bhi advancement aa jae pr purush ki soch nari ke liye kabhi nhi badlane wali. Lanat hai aise smaj ko....jo ghor stri virodhi hai. Ye haal to tab hai jab sabke gharon mein bahan betiyan hein. Agar aise logo ke gharon mein keval purush ho to smaj ko tabah hone se koi rok nhi sakta.😢
@GamingBoy-gm6dxАй бұрын
Ladki ko padhaate hi kyon hai jab kamana nahin hai bure samay mein😅 Sab baat hai jab ladki padhi likhi hai to khud ka kharcha khud uthaen bheek kyon mang rahi hai
@@GamingBoy-gm6dxladke kyu bheekh magte phirte h phr..ladkiyon ke liye ...jhoot kyu bolte h...mene to kisi nikkame ke rishte aate huye nhi dekhe
@ashishkaushik179028 күн бұрын
@sushilkumari Tu bhi koi mufatkhoreee lagti hai... Apna tv serial ki script mat likh... This is real life!!
@khanrashid902325 күн бұрын
Apne pati se kitne paise demand kye ho 20 lakh ya 25 lakh...😂😂 Or haan 25 lakh jab bhari coat me le sakti haen toh 25 baar coat me sex bhi karna banta hae husband ko gift...25 laakh ki rakam😂😂😂😂😂 25 baar ghapa ghap
@tilakchandkatoch13434 ай бұрын
शादी तो लड़की ने इसके साथ की है।
@tantriknarayandasАй бұрын
यह बेखुदा जज तय करके बैठता है कि स्कूल लड़की के पक्ष में रहना है चाहे तार कुछ भी रहते हो
@krk54532 ай бұрын
ऐसे केस पत्नी ने पति को मेंटेनेंस देना चाहिए...
@prashantgupta74136 ай бұрын
शादी अकेले का लड़के ने करी शादी तो लड़की ने भी करी
@parthsarthipandey43073 ай бұрын
माननीय न्यायधीशों को ऐसा क्यों लगता है कि लड़के ने ही शादी की है और उसे ही मेंटेनेंस देना है। जब बात आज बराबरी की है तो लड़कों को इतना परेशान घर वाले, ससुराल वाले, पुलिस और न्यायालय क्यों प्रताड़ित करते हैं। लड़की को क्यों नहीं मेंटेनेंस देना चाहिए पति को यह समझ मे नहीं आता।
@prerna87Ай бұрын
Barabari huyi kaha h hindu me aaj bhi ladki ko apna Ghar chodna padta b carrer chodna padta kisi dusre ke Ghar Jake uski full time maid banna padta h Phr rishte me problem aane pe vapas bhuddape me ab vo apna carrer banane jaye ya Ghar aur bacche sambhale...to pahle use barabari pe laye apne Ghar lake apni maid na banaye
@dilpreetsinghsidhu32175 ай бұрын
Very kushal lawyer, I wish everyone was as dedicated to the cause
@ककककततत5 ай бұрын
kya baat hai, msc wali ne 8th class wale se shadi kar li..
@rohitvimal43613 ай бұрын
5000 कमाने वाले से शादी करा दी और लगन में 5 लाख भी दे दिया ,वाह भाई वाह कहा है ऐसे सास ससुर
@ravshars3 ай бұрын
लड़के वाले अक्सर झूठ बोलते है, शादी से पहले। पर लड़की वालों को बिना छान बीन किए शादी करना भी गजब की बेवकूफी है।
@rohitvimal43613 ай бұрын
@@ravshars bhai झूठ दोनो बोलते है सिर्फ एक नही और झूठ न बोलें सब सच बता दे कभी शादी होगी भी नही
@Shalini74482 ай бұрын
@@ravshars dear men, B indepndnt, self depend,don't depnd on a wife that she will come in yr house and take care of yr family, bache, parents,....... Do househld chores, khud se cook krna or bachcho ko palna sikhiye, orat ye sb chize maa k pet se sikh k ni aati h, ghr m apni mother ko dekhte dekte hi sb seekh jati h ghr ghrsthi sambhalna or bachcho ko paalna....Or aap b to usi ghr me rehte h to fr aap Q nahi sikh paate,apni maa or bhen ko dekh k?, Qki bhot se divorce isi bat p hte h, ki tumne ye ni kia tumne vo ni kia, bachcho ko sahi se ni pala falana dikana,... Better to do it yourself........ Hm b to financially independent bn gyi h na??? To tum b bn jayo self dependent...... Asa krke tm apni ptni ki nazro me b uper uthoge izzat k sath........... Ghr m tumhari izzat hogi, samaj me izzat hogi tumhaari fir...
@Shalini74482 ай бұрын
@@rohitvimal4361 dear men, B indepndnt, self depend,don't depnd on a wife that she will come in yr house and take care of yr family, bache, parents,....... Do househld chores, khud se cook krna or bachcho ko palna sikhiye, orat ye sb chize maa k pet se sikh k ni aati h, ghr m apni mother ko dekhte dekte hi sb seekh jati h ghr ghrsthi sambhalna or bachcho ko paalna....Or aap b to usi ghr me rehte h to fr aap Q nahi sikh paate,apni maa or bhen ko dekh k?, Qki bhot se divorce isi bat p hte h, ki tumne ye ni kia tumne vo ni kia, bachcho ko sahi se ni pala falana dikana,... Better to do it yourself........ Hm b to financially independent bn gyi h na??? To tum b bn jayo self dependent...... Asa krke tm apni ptni ki nazro me b uper uthoge izzat k sath........... Ghr m tumhari izzat hogi, samaj me izzat hogi tumhaari fir...
@justcoz3772 ай бұрын
@@ravshars chhanbeen ki jaroorat to tab pade jab ladki badchalan na ho..aajkal to ladkon ko medical checkup karwana awshyak hai
@basantitanga36316 ай бұрын
Same judge refused to accept a 420 charge when the wife lied about her qualification by saying that she is 12th pass while in reality she was only 10th pass. 😂😂😂
@akashhanvate77825 ай бұрын
Section 496 defines the offence of fraud marriage the case was filed under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) i.e deals with cheating and dishonestly inducing someone to part with property. Also accusation towards the curruption of police depatment and also the accusation towards his mother in Law where non of it was filed in the Affidevite.
@vraddhi35564 ай бұрын
Uss aadmi ne galat section mai charge lagaya tha. Also, usne apni mother in law ke liye prostitute jaisa word use Kiya. Pure police department ko generalise karne ke baad corrupt bola. Then Judge Ahluwalia handled the situation very well and told him aapne bhi marriage se pehle advocate bataya apne aapko aur mera muh mat khulwaiye jab aapke paas 3-4 clients hi hai toh financial position aapki bhi strong nhi hai aur iske liye aapne bhi kya bola hoga. Woh aur uska advocate dono galat the. That is why they stepped back kyuki inhone ek women ka aur pure police department ka character assassinate kiya. That person was uneducated jisko advocate hone ke baad bhi nhi pta kis section mai kaunsa case file hoga. Toh aadhi adhuri information pr smart mat bno
@vraddhi35564 ай бұрын
Uss case ko pura dekhlo yha logo ko galat information Dene se pehle. Phir 😂 bhej lena. 420 section ki category mai nhi aata woh aur advocate hone ke baad bhi he didn't have basic knowledge that he cannot malign someone's character in court. But he did so saying mother in law is prostitute and entire police department is corrupt. That time Judge Ahluwalia pointed that out and he and his advocate had to step back because they were wrong. Aise toh tum kahi ka case khi le jaoge. Aur iss baare mai bhi bta do that as an advocate himself he merely had 3-4 clients jisko Judge Ahluwalia ne subtle tarah se yeh bhi bola tha ki aapne bhi apni exact financial position nhi batayi hogi toh sab sacchai mat bulwao yha pr. People like you don't understand anything in depth sirf bakwas karni hoti hai.
@sanjurajput_92Ай бұрын
Advocate is genius
@krishnannarayanan52523 ай бұрын
even if u have no law degree but have the ability to settle the dispute / support him with his arguments & settle it (equal to repairing / fixing), then will he be labeled as skilled advocate/ lawyer??? Honourable judge is unnecessarily complicating. let this honourable judge his opinion on my doubt.
@hridayeshverma18664 ай бұрын
Great appreciation for the Honorable Judge..his observation is examplry..
@thecontrarycontrarian42302 ай бұрын
Biased judge
@basantitanga36316 ай бұрын
According to Indian laws Husband is responsible for providing maintenance of wife as well as her pet dog who provide mental support.😂😂😂
@ravindraprasad54866 ай бұрын
Now a day gender equality husband and wife both are earning. This judge have mentallity of 1947.who make him judge in divorse case maintaince is for spouce thats not geneder specific in law. If both are earning then no one can get. If husband is earning less and wife is more wife will give maintainace for Husband. Pata nahee kis desh kaa kannon iss judge nahee padhaa hain
@vraddhi35564 ай бұрын
Dowry Milne pr nhi rote ho tum log maintenance nhi Diya jata bas.
@ravindraprasad54864 ай бұрын
@@vraddhi3556 Baap aur Bhai bhee kisi kaa pati hotaa hain
@basantitanga36314 ай бұрын
@@vraddhi3556 Drowry is illegal in India, both parties giving & taking drowry is a criminal in eyes of the law. While the same law states that maintenance is responsibility of the husband. 😥😔😞
@Shalini74484 ай бұрын
@@ravindraprasad5486 jb husband wife dono earning h to ghr sambhalne ki responsibility wife ki hi kyu,
@SinghMr-lv4ok6 ай бұрын
electrition hi hota hai vo,judge is right
@sachdiawaj89526 ай бұрын
Wife why not working
@biswadeeppandit50736 ай бұрын
The advocate has done a superb advocacy specially explaining the skilled & unskilled labour..leaned & gained knowledge 👏
@deepakparmar754911 сағат бұрын
Good argument ❤
@Harshit.vlogs00073 ай бұрын
chaudhary sahab ne mja bandh diya
@sanjaymishra28483 ай бұрын
Technical grounds par jaiye kanoon aur law na jane aam nirnay karnge maniye Sabke Datta Ram
@ganeshbanerjee98413 ай бұрын
Brilliant advocate
@Pachpan-p9s2 ай бұрын
Amazing lawyer
@rishigoel716 ай бұрын
When God make relationship. Then how could judge put the wrong judgement against the husband.
@sudhanshuswami23045 ай бұрын
1 पति 5000 से ज्यादा ही कमाता होगा। stereo की वाइरिंग भी कोई सीधा सरल काम नहीं है। 2 इस बात का कोई जिक्र नहीं कि पत्नी क्यों नहीं कमा रही। 3 5000 में घर का खर्च चलना मुश्किल है, परंतु पति पत्नी दोनों कमाए और दोनों घर का काम करे तो 10000 में चल सकता है। 4 पति की इंकम यह है, वो स्किल्ड है या नहीं है, उसने शादी के समय पर मैट्रमोनीअल साइट पर क्या लिखा होगा, 5000 में घर चल सकता होगा या नहीं , यह सारे तो अनुमान और अंदेशा लगा लिए, पर पत्नी क्यों छोड़कर गई, काम क्यों नहीं कर रही, वो घर नहीं रहेगी तो घर का काम कौन करेगा , इस से पति की कमाने का समय कम होगा, इन बिंदुओं पर विचार तक नहीं हो रहा !
@SumitKumar-ul3hw2 ай бұрын
Irritate people irritate others.
@zenzui930412 күн бұрын
Wife ne bhi to shadi ki hai, if both are equal partner then why Man has to pay why not women to pay men.
@rohan3_official21 күн бұрын
How old these videos are??
@jitendersharma72711 күн бұрын
where is concluding part
@sushantdeshmukh25456 ай бұрын
Judges are Blindly taken Side of women...but actually in LAW doesn't specify only husband should pay for maintenance... But actually it is defined. In LAW either husband or wife can claim for maintenance. But if anyone raising voice against false judgement it will b easily molded To Contamept of Court.. it's not good for indian Society,
@abhi.kaushik44955 ай бұрын
Andha kanon, legal terrorism isko hi bolte hai.
@VIJAYSINGH-wp2sjАй бұрын
Shaandar advocate 🏹🎯
@g-page6453 ай бұрын
Be that as it may. The girl is educated and she can earn on her own equality.
@savitrirai77742 ай бұрын
जज साहब पति पत्नी दोनों की शादी मील कर होता है पर अलग होने पर पति को परेशान क्यों किया जाता है दोनों को बराबर सज़ा मिलनी चाहिए
@damandesignerstudio83754 ай бұрын
Phle boy..bhut.. educated hota h...phir divorce ki baat aate hi... Uneducated ho jata h... Are..bhai..phle..jhoot bolke shadi krte ho....sochte ho ab kha jayegi.... Are paglo...court hi jayegi...
@Neerajkumar-yt9qr6 ай бұрын
14:51..... High court mai .. Hindi........🙆
@SumitKumar-ul3hw2 ай бұрын
Jo khud Lakho me salary lete hai woo sadhak me kaam karne walo ka majak udate hai. Power means responsibility not ghamand. Kya 5 hajar kamane wala shadi nahi kare or government ne garibi rekha kya rakhi hai?
@AnkitYadav-ej2cc6 ай бұрын
pati kamaye patni baith ke khaye ye matlab hai is judge ka
@SiratKalra-rr1hl6 ай бұрын
To paida hote hi hizre bn Jaya kro boys....fir tum b baith kar khana patni ki tarah .......kiyo tumare maa baap boy paida hone pr faltu k dhol bajate firte h....
@AnkitYadav-ej2cc6 ай бұрын
@@SiratKalra-rr1hl tum hijra ho kya 😂😂
@ravindraprasad54866 ай бұрын
Now a day we are talking about gender equality husband and wife both are earning. This judge have mentallity of 1947.who make him judge in divorse case maintaince is for spouce thats not geneder specific in law. If both are earning then no one can get. If husband is earning less and wife is more wife will give maintainace for Husband. Pata nahee kis desh kaa kannon iss judge nahee padhaa hain
@ravindraprasad54866 ай бұрын
Kaam Karo kamao aur husband kau bhee maintainnace dain
@SiratKalra-rr1hl6 ай бұрын
@@ravindraprasad5486 husband apne baap se maintenance maange.....wife se ni.....itna to dimaag rkho.... because dahej se wife tumara muh phle hi bhar chuki hoti h.....
@ambujpandey5526Ай бұрын
Pehli bar judge sahab chup ho gaye
@jitendersharma72711 күн бұрын
maintenance should be given or not on ground of more educated wife and whether a sterio fitting person is an unskilled person, are two different issue. both grounds are not established to deny maintenance thats why judge asked for apex court rulings. people without knowing the judgement, started to curse judge for sympathetic to wife.
@RohanKumar-qm7bj4 күн бұрын
कुछ तो झोल है, जो आदमी 5000 कमाएगा ओर 8वी तक ही पढ़ा है वो शादी के लिए मेट्रीमोनियल साइट पे प्रोफाइल डालता है, खुद को सेल्फ एम्प्लॉयड दर्शाता है, लेकिन इनकम नहीं दर्शाता, उसे शादी में 5 लाख का सामान भी लड़की वाले देते है, लड़की Msc होके भी 8वी पास से शादी करने को राजी हो जाती है, ओर जब तलाक की नौबत आती है तो खुद तो unskilled ओर मात्र 5000 कमाने वाला दर्शाता है, वाह, जज साहब को वकालत के साथ उम्र का भी तजुर्बा है,😅😅😅
@ravijaiswal6145Ай бұрын
These type judges should be removed from judiciary, maintenance is for them who are illiterate, unskilled
@Yarr_bharosa3 ай бұрын
Pr kuchh v ho ajj vakil sahab ne judge sahab ko bolne ka mauka hi nhi diya
@jagdishrajchopra4 ай бұрын
In most of the cases electricians are doing all the job wring as well as installation of stereo system in cars. Is not skilled person he has launched only to install stereo.
@jky1528Ай бұрын
Mai to kahta hu koi bhi purush koi bhi mahila se shadi hi na kare aur puri duniya se admi ka namo nishan khatam ho jaye fir ye jhanjhat hi khatam😂😂😂
@devshyara94842 ай бұрын
Yeh Judge power ka istemaal karke kisi ko bolne nahi deta...sabse phehle yahi baat galat hai aur toh aur vakil hee nahi bol pa rahe hai
@hemrajhemraj61982 ай бұрын
Double mind double policy
@samaryadav54543 ай бұрын
Judge saheb aap apane salary se paisa de de ...jab nahi de sakate to aap kon hoto ho kisi ka faisala karane wale ..aap se poochh kar sadi ki thi kya
@rajnishkhajuria4 ай бұрын
This is really very unfartunate and uuhuman and shows the sickness of mind of the system and society .
@ravindraprasad54866 ай бұрын
Now a day we are talking about gender equality husband and wife both are earning. This judge have mentallity of 1947. in divorse case maintaince is for spouce thats not geneder specific in law. If both are earning then no one can get. If husband is earning less and wife is more wife will give maintainace for Husband. Pata nahee kis desh kaa kannon iss judge nahee padhaa hain
@deepika5892 ай бұрын
Divorce ki spelling to pta nhi, aaye ho gyan baantne
@ranbirsingh87854 ай бұрын
Why both not thought at the time of marriage this thing?
@hemrajhemraj61982 ай бұрын
To biwi padhi likhi hai maintenance nhi kaanoon kyun bnaya likha fir
@rahulvasudeva93032 ай бұрын
Hire mr.chidamabram , sibbal singhvi,dave and u will get favourable order. No matter what hire an high class advocate no judge will dare to argue with them and give them whatever order they want.
@pahadichannelkathur3 ай бұрын
जब वो कमा रही है तो मेंटेनेंस क्यूं देना नहीं देना चाहिए औरतों को भी पैसे की भूख हो गई है
@akmishra35533 ай бұрын
जिसको तलाक चाहिए उसको देना होगा।
@vkchaturvedi46912 ай бұрын
To ye galat hai aurat bahar ka hawa le😂😂 pati ke sath na rhe to talak koi bhi dega swabhimani ensan@@akmishra3553
@prajaptiramu34496 ай бұрын
महिलाओं को लाचार समझना है या पत्नियों को लाचार कमजोर जो पढ़े भी तो कोई काम का नही है और पति या पुरूष तो नारी से ज्यादा ही मजबूत होता है अधिकांश यही कोर्ट का कहना होता है और यह सच भी हो मै नही जानता मै कुछ समझ नही पाया कोई तो बताये
@rahulvasudeva93036 ай бұрын
Please read sec 125 crpc, a wife who is unable to maintain herself , how an educted, abled body girl cannot maintain herself.
@garrysekhon5426 ай бұрын
Do you think India has no unemployed with masters degree?
@rahulvasudeva93036 ай бұрын
Y the same is not applicable to man then. After all men and women are equal.
@sethysiba5 ай бұрын
lekin kaha likha hai husband ko hi khana khilna hai? ladki saadi kyun kia??
@DMIndia_Official3 ай бұрын
agar person income tax payee nahi hai to maintenance apply nahi hona chahiye
@deepika5892 ай бұрын
Tumhare logic se to fir aise insaan ko shadi bhi nhi krni chahiye
@nirmal158128 күн бұрын
Husbands kyun dega wife de maintenance
@payalvarma22276 ай бұрын
inko jaj banata kon pati rakhna chahata hai patni rahena nhi chahai to ye bolte hum kuch nhi kar sakte agar patni bole mai rahena chahati hoon or pati mana kare to ye jo jaj bane pathe hai to pati ko bolte jail jai ya paise do inka kanoon he dogla hai
@PawanSaini282 ай бұрын
Court ladies ko kaam krne ke liye kab bolega
@CryptoFeeders3 ай бұрын
kitne outdated hai indina courts , inke paas previous cases ka koi data bhi nahi hota hai.
@mohammadabdullah18496 ай бұрын
Simply the petitioner is non skilled worker as he is only able to install music system in the vechile, And not skilled worker because he cannot repair the music system
@suneetrainbow6 ай бұрын
Trap में आसानी से आ गए,,,, भूमिका पर प्रश्न चिन्ह
@BishalBasak943 ай бұрын
Illiterate judge. If a person doesn't have a degree or certificate he isn't a skilled worker. That's how industries recruits.