We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder
@lieutenantkettch5 жыл бұрын
Rolex went to Everest. Omega went to the Moon.
@bishoyibrahim14445 жыл бұрын
Underrated comment!
@FfortheT5 жыл бұрын
Interestingly, Rolex wasn't on the summit. That has been a Smiths. Rolex is very good at setting up myths.
@benedictmarshall8635 жыл бұрын
There were two people to reach the summit, Tenzing Norgay - who actually wore a Rolex, and Sir Edmund Hillary - who is still the subject of debate regarding which watch he wore to the summit.
@perrooceaniko20055 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha .... hold my beer ..! and to the bottom of the oceans ... 3 times the rated capacity...
@attilaboda98815 жыл бұрын
Bulova also went to the Moon - and it costs a fraction of their prices!
@umt64295 жыл бұрын
Not a huge watch person. But from a purely aesthetic point of view that omega watch is one of the most stunning watches I've ever seen
@heymedic63985 жыл бұрын
Ever seen a 1950-1960 seamaster?
@mmuku86555 жыл бұрын
@@heymedic6398 Couldn't touch this one mate. I wanna buy one
@DK4Code5 жыл бұрын
LUPEDI Roblox from an aesthetic view Rolex are pretty plain and ugly. Look at this thing the dial is hand carved with precision
@arjunyeleshwarapu5 жыл бұрын
LUPEDI Roblox my grandfather owned one and gave it to my uncle. it’s a real piece of art
@muhammadaryawicaksono42326 жыл бұрын
But, is it better than MVMT?
@BobbyDazzler8886 жыл бұрын
Doksos Aryawaela only a chinese tourbillon is better than a MVMT
@TheHobbyist4126 жыл бұрын
Not a chance. MVMT>everything else
@Light-vu6ws6 жыл бұрын
AlphaM says no
@paulburger99046 жыл бұрын
Came for this comment
@TheMatchReview6 жыл бұрын
Not even AP, A lange & Sohne or Patek can compete with MVMT for heritage, class, etc *cough cough*
@Jin-Ro5 жыл бұрын
No interest in watches, no idea why this appeared in my feed, but have to say, your macro camera work and scripting is top shelf stuff.
@vouivremem64595 жыл бұрын
Spoken by the late supreme leader himself.
@s1d3k1ckRO5 жыл бұрын
If you have no interest in watches you should find a way to have it.
@gickojerke12625 жыл бұрын
Kim jong is actually Shute watch enthusiast
@mooseknuckle83345 жыл бұрын
Ikr it's one of the main reasons I subscribed lol
@VanIsleNuckFan5 жыл бұрын
Free your people, its time!
@hodanotyoda6 жыл бұрын
"Seiko took 7 out of 10 spots, including the top spot, so the Swiss don't want to play anymore." LOL... I guess we are now playing the heritage game instead!
@jandomzky5 жыл бұрын
I therefore conclude that Seiko is the 🐐
@johnlucas66834 жыл бұрын
@ragnar ulrichson Power of marketing.
@littleberghi21114 жыл бұрын
Domz Manuel Laugh in Swiss
@adisadis63136 жыл бұрын
Many brands are better than rolex....not only omega...but you see the power of marketing is the king...
@maleperson24495 жыл бұрын
Like who? (Genuine question as I'm not knowledgeable)
@ecxstasy3475 жыл бұрын
male person Also want to know.
@Jee_oon5 жыл бұрын
@@maleperson2449 Jaeger LeCoultre? Patek?
@maleperson24495 жыл бұрын
@@Jee_oon Why are you asking me? I'm asking you! What makes one that good better than another? Surely they're all super accurate so I guess it's complications or extra functions?
@maleperson24495 жыл бұрын
@Life Changing 20s They do have beautiful faces
@zzygyy6 жыл бұрын
Rolex = "Is that real?" Omega = "Cool watch"
@leeharding83066 жыл бұрын
Zzygyy so true 👍🏼
@4gegtyreeyuyeddffvyt6 жыл бұрын
I’ve never gotten a single compliment on my speed master my seiko and citizen get compliments all the time. So yea after owning a omega for 4 years I’ve never had a single person say “ cool watch”
@leeharding83066 жыл бұрын
Steve that’s a nice watch Steve👍🏼 is it a Omega? I have a few Omega’s love them 👌🏼
@zzygyy6 жыл бұрын
@@4gegtyreeyuyeddffvyt That sucks. It's a cool watch.
@johnmorrison83516 жыл бұрын
Steve, I’ve never been complimented on my Speedmaster either, but my Seamaster gets a lot of attention... Weird
@FakeRussianDude5 жыл бұрын
*slowly looks down at Casio watch*
@eldadhota42605 жыл бұрын
*slowly looks down at a damn Vostok watch while USSR anthem plays in the background*
@randymiller49785 жыл бұрын
Slowly looks down at the hair on my wrist.
@ulyssesjimenez875 жыл бұрын
Slowly looks at handcuffs on wrists
@mattm.35625 жыл бұрын
Adrian Jimenez kinky ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
@khanomeir975 жыл бұрын
Slowly looks down at my anaconda
@katalysis6 жыл бұрын
Rolex was started by a business man, a really good one. He contracted watchmakers to build a product that was "good enough", but never haute horology, as that made no sense for ROI. His DNA continued on through the brand, and as a result, Rolex's most significant achievements have been not in watchmaking, but in marketing. Rolex invented the first celebrity endorsement. Rolex invented the strategy that by giving away its watches to professionals who would go on to achieve firsts in diving or mountain climbing expeditions, the lay person will feel that the watch...had something to do with it. And just as often true today as it was back in the 70s, it was Rolex's brilliant marketing and curation of its product catalog that have propelled the brand past its peers. Its watches, however, have remained dormant in horological impact for over half a century. This is, word for word, how Rolex chooses to introduce itself on its own website: "For over a century, Rolex watches have accompanied explorers and achievers around the world, from the top of the highest mountains to the deepest reaches of the ocean. Today, Rolex is present at the most prestigious events in golf, sailing, tennis, motor sport, and at equestrian tournaments."
@zzeuss876 жыл бұрын
This comment is astute and factual. In my experience, it has no business being on a YT comment board. Just having fun, but your views are spot on. Hans was ahead of the curve with connecting his brand with celebrity. Sure seems to have worked out well for him.
@kurtmagbujos6 жыл бұрын
Sounds similar to Daniel Wellington today.
@superlameusername3626 жыл бұрын
Rolex is the Apple of watch making.
@zzeuss876 жыл бұрын
SU You couldn't be more wrong. I bet Rolex lasts as long as apple, with tech that changes slowly. Apple must always release new versions annually, which demands progress. Rumors of their demise have been absurdly exagerrated, but I remember Motorola, Nokia, Ericsson. History repeats. I'm sure both will do well for years, but my money is on Rolex outliving apple.
@jumboJetPilot6 жыл бұрын
I’d rather spend my money on a maker that has invested its money on innovating its product rather than celebrity endorsing and advertising.
@paulbroderick84385 жыл бұрын
Bought a new Omega Seamaster Automatic in 1975. Still runs fine.
@DjVader1124 жыл бұрын
paul broderick how many times has it been serviced?
@hothmobile1005 жыл бұрын
Rolex was great......before 1972. You could buy a steel submariner for only 280 bucks. Now, Rolex is ridiculously and insanely overpriced.
@rhodawg6665 жыл бұрын
Yer its a joke
@mikiii8805 жыл бұрын
$280 in '72 is the equivalent of $1750 today. Not exactly cheap if you ask me.
@chinaman15 жыл бұрын
@@mikiii880 Rolex do not go for lesser than 10k now.
@thetechlibrarian5 жыл бұрын
Even when I was in high school a submariner was $4,500 and that seemed like something you might work towards now there price point is crazy.
@shahinpj49035 жыл бұрын
Overpriced bro it takes the one year to make one watch
@edward20845 жыл бұрын
That Omega watch right there is so much more than a watch. It's an engineering marvel and a work of art, for starters... 👍
@neitherlink66125 жыл бұрын
Ed Ward a work of art, yes. An engineering marvel, no. Mechanical watches nowadays are jewelry, anyone trying to say otherwise is just in denial.
@edward20845 жыл бұрын
To my untrained eye it is indeed an engineering marvel as are all wrist watches. 👍
@J69Nice3 жыл бұрын
@@edward2084 I would say that Spring Drive is the real marvel in this day and age. All mechanical watches are more of an art as they are inefficient and inaccurate compared to quartz and spring drive
@Freedom899845 жыл бұрын
My Rolex from Guangzhou is the best
@Mint-cb2vc5 жыл бұрын
yeah but it will last only 12 months
@robfulano25525 жыл бұрын
Meat Gainz No way mate. At least 10 years.
@MarttiSuomivuori5 жыл бұрын
My Guangzhou LoLex stopped 2 weeks from purchase.
@JShine-tp6hx5 жыл бұрын
Chinese Rep. Rolex is Almost same appearance and good quality with 300~ 500USD Vs. 10000USD~ Original Rolex. No more Value for Genuine Rolex...
@TheBVlion5 жыл бұрын
You seem to be proud to get a cheap replica. I prefer originals. Even if it is a a cheap watch. Your attitude is somehow poor...
@xxyxnxwxaxx97245 жыл бұрын
Just absolutely poetic, engineering at it's best just pure and simple beautiful. I used my last army wages for an omega seamaster waved blue face. Fell on hard times and had to sell. I remember in basic my corporal haven one. And he use to be proude of it. And said one day you lads may have one of these I wasnt into watches then. But it was somethin to aim for and I fell in love with the seamaster. So I purchased it in love and respect. And had to sell it as I got skint and needed my car on the road. A month later the bloody car went pop and i didnt have the money to fix it. What a shitter. But life goes on and one day I'll save hard again if I can as my kids now come 1st but if I can I'll purchase one again. And smile when wearing it. It will mean more then as it will have a better story to it.
@BarnOwl616 жыл бұрын
So glad you gave Omega the attention it deserves over Rolex!
@adrianchoo3375 жыл бұрын
"...and the Swiss didn't want to play anymore."
@MrIORO5 жыл бұрын
Japanese engineering is an endless pursuit of perfection, Grand Seiko is probably the only brand that can claim everything is done in house even rolex outsource the hands of their watches
@Maxfli825 жыл бұрын
MrIORO I heard seiko even mines its own quartz.
@Maxfli825 жыл бұрын
Sounds like my 5 year old who doesn’t want to play anymore when she’s losing
@MrIORO5 жыл бұрын
@@Maxfli82 not sure about that, but for a fact I know the age the quartz crystals until they fit them worthy
@toggimir5 жыл бұрын
Haha, that Seiko comment killed me! 😂
@sgkrk_5 жыл бұрын
when omega went to the moon, rolex went to the mall.
@deghihderaman35723 жыл бұрын
Only people with blue moon can see the future.
@jpl18613 жыл бұрын
No it didn't. It made it out directly to scalpers. Didn't even make it to display cabinet.
@Chipchase7806 жыл бұрын
I wear my 1970 Omega constellation chronometer daily. It’s getting on for 50 years old and still accurate. It’s 564 caliber 24 jewel automatic movement is considered to be the finest ever produced by Omega.
@BaronDeRothschild6 жыл бұрын
Personally I've never understood the hype behind the Rolex in the context of aesthetics. I know there is a lot of history and sentimental value behind the brand. But it lacks individuality for me. I prefer aesthetics in design and movement. Name brand is irrelevant to me.
@mattwasilewicz96776 жыл бұрын
Keeping their designs basically un-changed is a long term play to keep your product relevant and retain its value. Same reason who cars like the 911 or G-Wagon hold onto value so well. Doesn't matter if it is a new one or an old one, they have the same basic look which is easy to distinguish and builds an identity
@sadaka2016 жыл бұрын
yes. Check out BALL watches. Unique design. Great tech. and very reliable.
@jhmsmarttv7956 жыл бұрын
+Itu M Rolex, -the worlds most copied brand... it doesn't get more original than that. Rolex is not a hype, it's the manufacturer who sets the standard for the rest. 😎
@marcusskyfall6 жыл бұрын
@@jhmsmarttv795 are you joking?
@ckm-mkc6 жыл бұрын
@@jhmsmarttv795 LOL - let me guess, you also believe that Rolls Royce makes the best car in the world? Or that the only quality mens suit is made by Armani? Or that "A diamond is forever"?(cough) Glad people like you exist other wise TV & Facebook would be out of business....
@greentom6 жыл бұрын
gorgeous watch. price: 44.000$ used
@mattwasilewicz96776 жыл бұрын
That is actually a really good price for a tourbillion like this when you compare it to what else is out there on the market
@katalysis6 жыл бұрын
@@mattwasilewicz9677 Omega has always been a great value.
@feraldorozanandy11146 жыл бұрын
Matt Wasilewicz for a time telling device, made not with rare material and not so rare handcrafting skills... no other value than aesthetics and for the piece happens to be an Omega to make it 44.000 secondhand... tourbillon is useless nowadays
@ReformMsia6 жыл бұрын
NoExpert At Chrono24 = USD 94k
@AR-rk9nn6 жыл бұрын
Only $44? Bargain
@Drakovox6 жыл бұрын
Omega and Seiko fan here.... Excellent video, as always. What a beautiful watch, huge piece of horologe history
@ckm-mkc6 жыл бұрын
@MrLolmaster101 You mean great taste, sense of dress, knows how to cook? Awesome!
@phillippugh21616 жыл бұрын
@MrLolmaster101 wait what is this the 90s . Really dude a gay joke get a fucking life an grow up
@phillippugh21616 жыл бұрын
Big Seiko fanboy here love my grand Seiko snowflake , and a new owner of the seamaster m
5 жыл бұрын
Phillip Pugh It seems like you don't live in the 21 century, seeing as you're so fucking surprised to see a "gay joke." Piss off you overreacting fuckwit.
@SpyceMustFlow5 жыл бұрын
SEIKO, yikes.
@santfournier6 жыл бұрын
Very true, in fact those who lived in the 50’s mostly bought Omega.
@alvinkoh55565 жыл бұрын
This is the most beautiful piece I have seen of omega. It changes my opinion on the brand. I used to feel that omega’s pieces were boring and plain looking.
@Everythingfunnyonearth6 жыл бұрын
Always wanted Omega, but Rolex marketing makes it more recognized and feel pressure to get Rolex. Still the price point of Omega is appealing.
@zzygyy6 жыл бұрын
Omega= James Bond 007. 1990s and up....
@gilzineto6 жыл бұрын
You should definently go for omega seamaster planet ocean!
@Everythingfunnyonearth6 жыл бұрын
Don’t we all want to be that fancy sheep with all the bling. Lollll
@Tjocksnorriss6 жыл бұрын
"Pressure" LoL Not a fanboy of any of the brands, Rolex have a few nice watches same with Omega, most of them are meh to me.
@Hamburgerdad6 жыл бұрын
I've always thought that you should get the watch that you like. Personally, that was an Omega Seamaster. Others, it might be Rolex. The only person you're trying to please is yourself. If you like an Omega, get an Omega.
@SiriusXAim5 жыл бұрын
I've always said it. Rolex is bling for new money. Omega is for connoisseurs.
@kevinduncan96866 жыл бұрын
Thank you watchfinder. Do more of these because Omega is better in other ways. Omega did fall behind after the quartz crisis, but as far as I'm concerned they are back on top in terms of who makes a better watch. 15,000 gauss/coaxial escapement master chronometer.
@vincentturner-jacobs28986 жыл бұрын
Kevin Duncan , i agree. I have the AT 15000 Gauss and it’s a fantastic watch, fantastic coaxial movement and put together like a tank. Far far outstrips the Rolex Milgauss in many ways. Don’t get me wrong, I like Rolex and have the AK 2017 and the new DJ 41.
@tonygedalovitch89586 жыл бұрын
No they do it becasue they have been bought by Richemont, you know the company that owns Cartier, IWC, JLC and lots more but not.....Rolex get it?
@kevinduncan96866 жыл бұрын
Yeah Rolex made all the right moves during and after the quartz crisis so they came out on top. Omega had a good 20 even 30 years of producing some if the worst watches from any serious swiss brand their only saving grace was continuously producing the speedmaster during those dark years, but aside from Rolex making all the right moves and becoming the status symbol watch and continually making amazing watches. Omega produced a better watch until the end of the 1960s and now they produce a better watch again especially when you factor price. Rolex has the end in some ways but Omega has the better engine inside and it costs less. I love both brands but I also like an underdog and omega has been the underdog for a long time until now.
@ES-tr5no5 жыл бұрын
Tony Gedalovitch who was purchased by Richemont? Last I’ve seen was Omega was still part of Swatch Group and Rolex was still an independent.
@darrinbeckum79456 жыл бұрын
I just don’t care to wear gold watches, not my style. But holy crap is that a beautiful timepiece.
@Maxfli825 жыл бұрын
I saw this in an omega brochure recently and was astounded at the price. I guess it truly is a work of engineering and art that costs a lot to build. I love companies that push the boundaries of engineering rather than just opulence.
@neptunevibe5 жыл бұрын
I will never understand people fascination with Rolex. I always been an Omega guy.
@paulbroderick84385 жыл бұрын
I own a stainless steel Omega Automatic - SeaMaster 2000, bought new in 1975. Still runs well with no major repairs!!
@tonyharrisson68235 жыл бұрын
I’ve sold every Rolex I’ve ever had, never sold any of my Omegas.
@thegougy5 жыл бұрын
Because Omegas depreciate much more than Rolex /been there, done that, regret nothing :D/
@fansofst.maximustheconfess82265 жыл бұрын
@@thegougy Yeah, but OMEGA's watches are simply better in any crucial aspects.
@thegougy5 жыл бұрын
@@fansofst.maximustheconfess8226 Have had Speedy, DeVille, Submariner, several Seamasters, DateJust and honestly, in the macro photography the biggest amount of faults had the De Ville Power Reserve. As about the "better" - well it depends, from my point of view they are in the similar league, kind of "middle class every day wearers".
@UnderseaAdventures5 жыл бұрын
I own both brands and enjoy them. May I ask why you sold all your Rolex watches?
@Super1venom5 жыл бұрын
thats called stupidity .. no offence
@publiusvelocitor46686 жыл бұрын
Beautiful watch you've featured here. I think Omega is doing more interesting things in watchmaking (co-axial movement, use of ceramics, amagnetic parts, etc). I like Rolex, but lately they've taken some missteps- the ridiculous styling of their new Air King dial is horrible, and the Oyster Perpetual line has added faddish dial colors. Technologically, Rolex is reliable, but has not been particularly groundbreaking since introducing the Oyster case.... what? like 65 years ago? Like many others on this comment board, I think Grand Seiko is the brand to watch; an up and comer which will challenge Rolex.
@tods.99476 жыл бұрын
A brilliant video again. And as an Omega enthusiast I appreciate the lesson. But a couple of facts were missed. The board of longitude were looking for a navigation solution, not really a clock (although Harrison’s was the best solution to the problem). Harrison did get paid by the Longitude board, at least most of the prize after much hair pulling and help from his son. Finally Seiko was not unknown in the late 1960’s, far from it. They had been making “Chrono” grade movements for several years. But that was the first time they entered that competition.
@NicholasSpartan6 жыл бұрын
No offense to the other brands, but show me one watch which endured the following : NASA WATCH QUALIFICATION TESTS FOR MAN SPACE FLIGHT High temperature: 48 hours at 160 °F (71 °C) followed by 30 minutes at 200 °F (93 °C) Low temperature: Four hours at 0 °F (−18 °C) Temperature cycling in near-vacuum: Fifteen cycles of heating to 160 °F (71 °C) for 45 minutes, followed by cooling to 0 °F (−18 °C) for 45 minutes at 10−6 atm. Humidity: 250 hours at temperatures between 68 °F (20 °C) and 160 °F (71 °C) at relative humidity of 95% Oxygen environment: 100% oxygen at 0.35 atm and 71 °C for 48 hours Shock: Six 11 ms 40 g shocks from different directions Linear acceleration: from 1 to 7.25 g within 333 seconds Low pressure: 90 minutes at 10−6 atm at 160 °F (71 °C), followed by 30 minutes at 200 °F (93 °C) High pressure: 1.6 atm for one hour Vibration: three cycles of 30 minutes vibration varying from 5 to 2000 Hz with minimum 8.8 g impulse Acoustic noise: 30 minutes at 130 dB from 40 to 10,000 Hz. OMEGA SPEEDMASTER .
@orbit31076 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Nikitakis bulova lunar pilot
@NicholasSpartan6 жыл бұрын
@@orbit3107 no mate. Bulova went to the moon in the hand of Dave Scott but back in 1965 didn't passed the test... Only mechanical watches selected . It was a back up watch inside a pocket. But Bulova is truly an amazing watch indeed !
@orbit31076 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Nikitakis ok thank you for the information and have a nice day.
@NicholasSpartan6 жыл бұрын
@@orbit3107thanks mate ! U 2
@karbontanto2255 жыл бұрын
I'll stick to my casio g-shocks for waterproofing, solar power, and indestructibility
@hardworker55885 жыл бұрын
My collection has included Casio - Seiko - Rolex - Omega - Timex - Swatch - Louis Vitton - Porsche - the various watchmakers that make Disney watches and even watches bought at the dollar store. They have all been fun and I've enjoyed each one of them for their utility and aesthetics. But the Casios have proved the most durable and accurate.
@alexlo77085 жыл бұрын
Casio has it's plastic bracelet which's not good.
@khalidalamin80695 жыл бұрын
@@alexlo7708 G shocks dont die .....
@glorifiedbusdriver70366 жыл бұрын
One area where Omega need to improve to overcome Rolex: The bracelet.
@jaythesmurf99765 жыл бұрын
They are made in China lol The clasps feel cheap compared to even the pre-ceramic Rolex models.
@leestrada15 жыл бұрын
@@jaythesmurf9976 Omega bracelets are made in Switzerland.
@leestrada15 жыл бұрын
JaytheSmurf99 I know that discussion since a while. A replacement link doesn’t imply that bracelets are made in China.
@tbg95635 жыл бұрын
@@leestrada1 no point in arguing with a fan boy trust me mate it's like talking to a brick wall
@vamheredur4135 жыл бұрын
They have amazing bracelets, wdm?
@ejjrl1ify6 жыл бұрын
Both make fantastic watches. Residuals in Rolex are far better though. However, you shouldn’t let value cloud your judgement. Buy what sings to you and wear it.
@adam422116 жыл бұрын
"5 ways MVMT watches are better than Rolex"
@jaisaini58306 жыл бұрын
Lol
@jaycowper6 жыл бұрын
That video really colored my opinion of Alpha M. I still think he's got a great channel and some of his advice are useful to me in particular. However, as soon as it is a Vincero or a MVMT sponsored video, I just skip it. Anyways, laughed so hard that my pepsi shot out my nose when I read your comment.
@jaycowper6 жыл бұрын
Alpha M had me DYING when he said "Reason number 1, HERITAGE!" what the actual hell.
@adam422116 жыл бұрын
@@jaycowper Well, the same here, but then I found some style channels that are actually better than AlphaM.
@drmodestoesq6 жыл бұрын
@@jaycowper Yeah, but Jay...look at it this way. It's what the academics call a "teachable moment." That's a euphemism for a giant screw up that they hope never happens again. Just look at the energy and argument A.M spent getting across a pile of pure nickel plated B.S. If he literally convinced one person out of a thousand to buy a MVMT watch....the MVMT company would be happy. It's not like they have a lot of overhead when it comes to actual watch manufacturing costs. And for young people watching a channel they should have to put a much more skeptical pair of glasses on at all times. Always ask themselves...."Where is the money or time for this upload coming from." And we should be skeptical, not cynical. It could be a person who loves the sense of international internet community. How many people in Des Moines, Iowa are into collecting 70's funk records? But there are thousands on the internet. Who knows what they have in a milk crate in the basement?
@mainarbor84165 жыл бұрын
Apple's to orange's. I'm a Watchmaker. He is showing a very rare dual axis tourbillon Omega. The Rolex Datejust is basically the entry level grade for Rolex and still made with Aircraft grade materials. Both have walked the Moon. Rolex is much more durable (You wont break them). Omega's "base model" is the Sea Master with an ETA Quartz or 2892. A few thousand dollars difference in price and quality.
@harrylime51475 жыл бұрын
I had 2 Omega Seamaster automatic watches. Both of them were fast by about a minute a week...When I asked a dealer about fixing that,He said, why would you want to fix that. That’s pretty good
@gabrielvazquez71475 жыл бұрын
Those Omega watches, when properly tuned should be at around +4 or -5 second per day.
@askfm.53185 жыл бұрын
As an Omega owner, I am proud of my watch.
@louie39755 жыл бұрын
What watch is it
@jamiefinn44385 жыл бұрын
Gotta remind watch finder that these videos are fantastic. The camera work is stunning and scripting is quite brilliant. And 'the hands' has the best voice. Also this watch us maybe my favourite of all time. Its just so unique but still so classy.
@matthewscott36896 жыл бұрын
Both are great. Omega is the top of the bottom, Rolex is the bottom of the top. Omega makes better watches, but Rolex is the better brand... Omega tends to water down their offerings by putting out 9272629 special editions. Rolex is more consistent (boring?), but it works for them.
@Mint-cb2vc5 жыл бұрын
Omega is the top of the bottom, Rolex is the bottom of the top" what ya talking about
@bobjosephs8376 Жыл бұрын
I inherited my father's 1944 gold Omega automatic with the early 28.10 caliber.He bought it in London on leave during the war where he was a bomber pilot. I recently had it serviced and it still runs perfectly. I own several Cartier watches, a Rolex, and old Seiko Divers, but the old Omega spens the most time on my wrist.
@afarhan216 жыл бұрын
Omega's stories are fascinating!
@djsinusoid5 жыл бұрын
I am thrilled whenever I see a video from watch finder! I can tell that this is the single channel that I can watch for the pleasure of listening of how it’s everything spoken, the way it’s explained and the way of using words in the speech. It’s the single best channel that captures my ears completely not only for the video but mainly for the audio...I could listen to an infinite of videos like this!!! Congratulations to the person speaking here and finding always a pleasant and relaxing way to tell a story! Unique mind must be! Chapeau
@5amH45lam5 жыл бұрын
Never had a Rolex, but I own five Omega's of different ages, movements and styles, and they all run beautifully. Even when having not run for some time (though I do try and keep some energy in their respective springs most of the time). In my opinion, they're say more stylish than Rolex's, and, arguably, more functional/practical - generally speaking. Understated in their appearance. Not showy. And besides, they're just cooler looking anyway; worn by cooler people... 😎 (I might be an exception to that rule though! Ha!) I love each of my Omega's for different reasons. All of them have stories and memories. They're worth way more to me - _two in particular: a 1970 Seamaster, and a 1968 Speedmaster_ - than their financial value. Those two would be the first things I'd grab if my house was burning down. (I don't have kids!) Rolex, inferior quality aside (!), is a watchmaker I shan't be investing in, nor would I choose to wear. They're OK, but not for me. 👍
@Jdeast5 жыл бұрын
At 0:11 the blued hand looks completely off center compared to the metal half-crescent underneath it. Is this just a mistake by Omega? Or is it intentional?
@AbdulRWatches6 жыл бұрын
Omega might be better than Rolex, but the people heading Rolex are by far the best in the business, and this reflects in the sales and marketing for both brands.
@redcapitalist6 жыл бұрын
Only because there are ignorant suckers to market to - like you
@AbdulRWatches6 жыл бұрын
@@redcapitalist I didn't say that i agree with the mainstream, i am just stating facts, not like you
@redcapitalist6 жыл бұрын
@@AbdulRWatches Fact is, you're doubling down on being a sucker. Not a good strategy
@lsamoa6 жыл бұрын
Apples and pears
@MrName8596 жыл бұрын
@@redcapitalist how are they being a "sucker"? They're simply stating that Rolex's marketing is top notch compared to Omega's.
@clo27156 жыл бұрын
My local watch repair guy specifically went to school for Rolex and when I asked him what kind of watch brand he recommended I buy he said get yourself a nice Omega. He was wearing a vintage omega.
@jal25506 жыл бұрын
just got my Omega 2018 Diver 300 in blue:) Love it!!
@edwardpetersii62765 жыл бұрын
The only thing I know is there is more Rolex watches out there that are second-hand than Omegas. That tells me one thing: Buyer’s remorse. People get so ecstatic and worked up when buying a Rolex. They feel like they’re buying into something, much greater than it actually is. When reality sets in, they see it’s only a watch and who knows how accurate it keeps time, how much to maintain, repair, etc. After the mystique wears off, you’re faced with what you actually bought and you had better love it. You shouldn’t have purchased something for investment purposes or because people told you that you should! The bottom line is, what you like is what should matter to you! I only know that I am going to get my money’s worth when I buy something. Therefore, I have to really like/desire it and what I get in return needs to positively correlate or measure up to the hard-earned money I put up for it! With that being said, Rolex is a nice looking watch but never appealed to me! I was always curious about all the excitement and fuss surrounding Rolex watches. It seemed like a ‘status’ symbol, rather than a useful, purely functioning device! I’ve seen many adorned with diamonds, other jewels, fancy dials, etc. many famous people have also made a point of wearing them, publicly. I get it, it’s a popular watch. I like Omega. Period. I could’ve bought a few Rolex watches, years ago but I never had the desire. I just bought my second Omega and I’m happy! This is what counts! I had a car one time and it was brand new. I loved it, it was sporty/luxurious and mine! I listened to people who told me I should get another type of car and I foolishly spent lots of money and ended up getting rid of it, anyway because I realized that wasn’t what I wanted!Go with what appeals to you. Forget the crowd. They won’t be wearing, enjoying or not, nor paying for it! You will! So get what you want! Both Omega and Rolex carry historical caches. However, both are different and unique in their own ways. You have to try them both on and see what’s best for you! The best advice I could give is this! You may try the Rolex on and it may be a dream come true or you may try and Omega and find you cannot be without it. You may want, both! That’s okay. The best of both worlds! Then, you won’t have to wonder! You’ll know!
@Itsme-vd3dx6 жыл бұрын
Who cares who is the best? I love my rolex hulk and I love my omega speedmaster.
@rikardskoglundrs6 жыл бұрын
*humble brag
@2deep5u6 жыл бұрын
I agree. Fighting over petty things like this is pointless.
@enriqueali6 жыл бұрын
@@rikardskoglundrs or statement of fact
@wailfaridi20706 жыл бұрын
@@rikardskoglundrs Not really the guy is just saying that he loves both his watches
@kjeldpedersen6666 жыл бұрын
Mr Carrera Absolutely agree. Both companies have made wonderful timepieces and I appreciate both. What does “best” mean? If it’s solely a matter of precision we would have stopped buying mechanical watches when the quartz watches came😊
@VxfreddyVx5 жыл бұрын
I was deciding between an Omega Seamaster Aquaterra and a Rolex Datejust. Honestly the Omega was just much more appealing to me with movement and aesthetic. The datejust just didn’t do it for me.
@markalexander7746 жыл бұрын
Rolex is the Apple of the watch world. There is much better out there and you can get one with the same specs for cheaper from other brands, but they have managed to convince a large percentage of people, particularly outside of the the aficionados, that they are the pinnacle of high end. In that respect, Rolex is certainly better at business than Omega.
@jmiquelmb6 жыл бұрын
Except than Apple is often top quality and reliability. Lately they've been fucking up hard with their laptops, but that doesn't change the fact that historically their products tend to be longer lasting than competition.
@dickiewongtk5 жыл бұрын
I heard that the tourbillon is of little value to the accuracy of a wrist watch because the thing is not stationary. It is now more a statement of craftmanship than anything. Is that true?
@1Eagler5 жыл бұрын
It’s true. Tourbillion was made for pocket watches that stand vertical in their pocket.
@oneashralph40766 жыл бұрын
Rolex is like buying house.It about resell value.Omega like buying exotic car.It about enjoy driving it & also has good resell value
@ec-hi1br5 жыл бұрын
My father gave me in Costa Rica a Constellation Omega watch in gold and steel. In the logo on the face it only says Omega_ automatic_ and chronometer, but no say officially certified. At the bottom it has a star and his name Constellation.On the back cover it has Gold logo with 8 stars and this cover is threaded. I took it out of my closet and it works excellent and very accurate. It has a 561 caliber, BUT I would like to know what year is it ? Thank you for the answer !
@jayebirdjb71436 жыл бұрын
Omega is superior to Rolex. jmo Especially this stunning Omega!
@midas19295 жыл бұрын
In 1994 I worked for SMH. I remember when the chairman took it off his wrist and showed it to me in his office one evening. The pride and the happiness in his eyes explaining the watch. Those who know appreciate this marvel. As for an inside view on competitive brands, we always highly respected Rolex, but we had full admiration and passion for Patek Philippe.
@rickj88595 жыл бұрын
Omega and indeed Longines, have lot longer history, than Rolex and both brands, unlike Rolex, have actually made their own movements, whilst Rolex till 2004, had their watches made by Aegler. That said, Rolex spends on advertising more, that the entire Swatch group and Richemont group together.
@mirceapuiufagadaru94914 жыл бұрын
Nice 👍🏻
@DeeKay19116 жыл бұрын
Wow ... The footage here and the the spoken words. I could watch this channel go through different variants of broccoli and would still watch all of them
@jacc888886 жыл бұрын
How do people think Omega compare with JLC? Are they of a similar level in terms of finishing, innovation and engineering precision? Rolex do the basic things extremely well - reliability, accuracy, wrist comfort etc but Omega and JLC seem more interesting as brands.
@ES-tr5no5 жыл бұрын
jacc88888 a Rolex accuracy and reliability over Omega? I and members of my family and friends have and do own both brands, Omega beats Rolex time and time again in its accuracy and it’s reliability. My experience with Rolex has not been a good one at all. As far as wrist comfort and aesthetics, that’s completely subjective.
@nath74865 жыл бұрын
I got the omega speedmaster racing 40mm for my 21st. Is this classed as a good watch?
@greentom6 жыл бұрын
i recommend the book 'Longitude' by Dava Sobel . it's a great read about John Harrison.
@clipper3076 жыл бұрын
NoExpert also a visit to the Greenwich observatory where Harrison’s story is told with his time pieces on display, it’s fascinating
@danielw.69926 жыл бұрын
Would you buy the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M, a Breitling Superocean Heritage II 42mm , or a Tudor BB58 ? I need some help with the decission for my first luxury watch
@johnsmith-gs4qf6 жыл бұрын
Omega Seamaster Diver
@mrcobbs62275 жыл бұрын
One might have the most accurate watch in the world... but still goes to work minutes late
@alvie00Alvie5 жыл бұрын
Mr Cobbs my manager has used his exact line on me before lmao
@Pilipinazz6 жыл бұрын
What is the model/ref no of the omega shown here?
@blxtothis5 жыл бұрын
At last, you’ve mentioned the hero of timepieces John Harrison, bravo! Oh for a Lottery Jackpot win, that Omega Tourbillon is the bee’s nuts!
@thecrow75 жыл бұрын
and to think we as in the uk designed and made arguably the best pocket watches in the 18th and 19th century alas like all things we were good at is no more :(
@waitjosiah4 жыл бұрын
Do you know how the minute and hour hand works? It seems they don’t connect to anything and floating on air.
@Vincekohz5 жыл бұрын
Casio quartz is more accurate than all the watches in this video
@nahyanrajee1985 жыл бұрын
so what? Atomic watches are more accurate than your casio
@iordeebeat5 жыл бұрын
@@nahyanrajee198 Many Casios radio synch with atomic watches
@nahyanrajee1985 жыл бұрын
@@iordeebeat nanoseconds are lost while syncing
@nahyanrajee1985 жыл бұрын
@@iordeebeat so no I'll stick to my atomic watch
@bigmacdaddy12345 жыл бұрын
In other words you are poor and can't afford a nice watch.
@johnfordice57636 жыл бұрын
What is that style of strap called? Specifically, the texture of the leather. Thanks!
@paceyombex6 жыл бұрын
Waiting for Rolex fanboy to pop up in this comment section *grabs popcorn.
@BobbyDazzler8886 жыл бұрын
Putra Ramadhan he is busy bribing his AD to get his next model.
@paceyombex6 жыл бұрын
@@BobbyDazzler888 lol I forget about that, good point
@markymark35726 жыл бұрын
He's probably selling his children into slavery so he can afford a Hulk or Batman on the grey market, having been told it's a 10 year waiting list from his AD...
@ripperx4446 жыл бұрын
Rolex is a commodity... if I buy one it’s with hopes of selling it for profit... wearing one doesn’t interest me anymore
@rbrant656 жыл бұрын
@DATING HARLEY QUINN Damn, dude. How old ARE you? Lol
@eugenederry3324 жыл бұрын
Pierce Brosnan and Sean Bean wears this watch in Goldeneye. Pierce wears a newer edition, while Sean wears an older edition. Pierce and Sean wear a silver Omega watch with a blue bezel in Goldeneye.
@phillippugh21616 жыл бұрын
I think the smart watch buyer out there is starting to get tried of Rolex game . An are starting to ask about other brands more an more according to my local AD who's one of the biggest in the Midwest . Omega and grand seikos in particular are starting to get noticed
@motiur97866 жыл бұрын
Yeah that what I did. I put myself on a waiting list for the GMT masters 2 and seadweller but till this very day haven't had a call. I ended up learning and reading about watches so much that it's become an addiction. But that is a great thing as I found something new I enjoy. I ended up getting a pelagos LHD. Because it was easily available to buy compare to the Rolex I mentioned. But I know a few other people too just like me made alternative choice as they got fed up waiting. Not economically a good decision if you buy from grey market on premium. For my lhd I couldn't get discount because at the time it was hard to find but now I see them in shop windows.
@phillippugh21616 жыл бұрын
@@motiur9786 good decision
@TehGureedo5 жыл бұрын
Where do you even find these watches?
@philirlam64036 жыл бұрын
The most beautiful watch ever, absolutely gorgeous. The face is so nice. I wonder if there are any homage of it.
@jamesbrown566 жыл бұрын
Phil Irlam (
@WatchGeek6 жыл бұрын
An excellent video covering some of the "forgotten" horological history, kudos for mentioning the Seiko demolishing the Swiss. The competitions are back again, but with the competitors being limited to Switzerland and the fact they simply canceled the last one when Seiko was winning gives the competition no credibility of any sort. In other words, it is a JOKE
@MegaMarlon01236 жыл бұрын
I like citizen, good product for the money
@sdemosi6 жыл бұрын
They are. They make some nice dive computers. I've always been a seiko fan when it comes to tool watches but citizen know how to build a reliable watch that looks good and works consistently well for years.
@Stigstigster6 жыл бұрын
@@cuy50 Watch people like to talk about watches. Simple as that.
@perrooceaniko20056 жыл бұрын
your comment right, also seikos. But is a comment not related at all with this video ....
@MegaMarlon01236 жыл бұрын
Perro Oceaniko im sorry if your hurt lol
@mariosiaven29656 жыл бұрын
For the money unbeatable: I have one of the first generations of eco Drive and the watch has been ticking non stop for 16 years powered only by average indoor light and the damned thing is tough as a war tank and the aestetics spot on mind you Im a Rolex/Omega/Tudor owner.
@cz1always6085 жыл бұрын
So is it worth to have a manual wind 18k gold 1950 ‘s /40 fixed . Have had estimated of 600 +. ??? Thanks
@kaypee19726 жыл бұрын
What a beauty! Actually one of the few Tourbillons, I really like.
@howardmckenna5 жыл бұрын
That is the most beautiful use and placing of a tourbillion I have ever seen. The rest of the watch surrounding it is super classy too.
@2deep5u6 жыл бұрын
I want Omega tech with Rolex design. Is that too much to ask?
@jaimegarcia-alvarezpala69096 жыл бұрын
No, the speedmaster
@matezahora20196 жыл бұрын
Omega globemaster is what you are looking for
@Quicksilver_Cookie6 жыл бұрын
@@jaimegarcia-alvarezpala6909 How is speedy a Rolex design? Oo
@THEMathHacker-121 Жыл бұрын
Perhaps stupid question but this isn’t a co-axial is it?
@ripperx4446 жыл бұрын
Look i can buy Omega... I can’t buy a Rolex!!! So who gives a shit about Rolex knowing it’s not the best horological watch with a fake wait list?? So many better buys out there
@mrp14276 жыл бұрын
ripperx444 you can buy everything except ss sports models dude.
@ripperx4446 жыл бұрын
jay p oh yea? I want a SS sky dweller.....show me where to get that
@shadiandrew5 жыл бұрын
what's the model of omega he showcase in video?
@knight15065 жыл бұрын
Cool watch but I can’t afford them so Casio is the best
@HtPt5 жыл бұрын
my friend have 200 different casios and Go-shocks . spent 1000s of dollars, buy 1 rolex finished . trade it get a better one , buy a Daytona , . even makes you money ..
@jsh12jho515 жыл бұрын
Knight of Christianity I’ve got a Rolex but after been told a service for my watch cost. Minimum of £500 I totally fucked them off. I’ve now got a Casio g mix that’s controls my music player Has world Times , dual display of digital and analogue , mobile finder, five alarms , night light , plus loads of features but most of it can take loads of abuse plus. It cost only £100 new. Love my Rolex but Casio is forever.
@eraytoma94535 жыл бұрын
What model is this ?
@danieloana35716 жыл бұрын
Damn...this is a beautiful watch!
@philirlam64036 жыл бұрын
Daniel Oană Isn’t it absolutely gorgeous.
@EWarrenEsun-_Ra5 жыл бұрын
what is the name of the watch in this video?
@aleramone235 жыл бұрын
All Swiss wathcmakers on the 60's: -Who is this Japanese maker name again? - Seiko.... or something, nobody knows them, they are irrelevant...
@ivanlagrossemoule5 жыл бұрын
The worst thing is that you still have some arrogant bastards that still think our watch industry is untouchable now.
@MartintheTinman5 жыл бұрын
I love my 1951 Westclox Dax. I restored it myself and it can handle a fall onto the bitumen. I know I unfortunately have tested it
@Th3Siam5 жыл бұрын
Omega is for the intelligent and those who appreciate beauty in engineering. Rolex is for the mans who buy Gucci toilet rolls
@jamalmahroof32985 жыл бұрын
How is buying an omega watch which depreciates much much faster and loses you money better than a Rolex that will likely hold value if not make you a profit? Good job "intelligent man". Omega watches are nice dont get me wrong if you can afford to lose money
@Th3Siam5 жыл бұрын
@@jamalmahroof3298 Bro what you said made you look like a twat. From your comment it looks like you only worry about the $price and not the design. You don't buy an Omega just because to sell it at a higher price afterwards like a Rolex. You buy it because it's a better watch. People who appreciate the design and engineering put into a watch would buy an Omega over a Rolex any day. You don't lose money when you buy an Omega, you get an Omega for what you paid for. Some Omegas do appreciate in price too but you wouldn't buy it for that reason. If you're looking for a watch to sell at a higher price after a few years to get some more money, then yea go for the Rolex.
@Hyxtrem5 жыл бұрын
Exactly. I've never understand this aswell. I've bought a Seamaster Paris City Edition just because I felt in love with it. I've hesitate with JLC master ultra thin or Grand Seiko sbgk005 but yeah, the fumé on thé Omega one us juste gorgeous.
@frantzeyssallenne63875 жыл бұрын
What is the specific model in the video?
@newnorth11005 жыл бұрын
Swatch owns omega and you watch finders. Rolex = totally independent.
@rodrigodeoliveiraleite51295 жыл бұрын
Watchfinder is owned by Richemont I think...
@desaturated60496 жыл бұрын
MVMT and DW, which one is better?
@commentjedi6 жыл бұрын
Rolex design is like the Classical Greek temple. Omega design is like the Italian....Roman era, Renaissance, Baroque, Mannerism......
@W1NGZER06 жыл бұрын
What kind of pen is that on the desk?
@shahorology32756 жыл бұрын
Longitude the movie, must watch for anyone into horology 💟