Damnit I love the way this guy talks. Simple. Rough. Refined. Remarkable.
@venusreena25323 жыл бұрын
He is old school with a boatload of experoence i would guess
@TomCook1993 Жыл бұрын
You forgot Iconic
@BrianPhillipsRC2 жыл бұрын
Very helpful. Now when is someone going to make an APP do all this with a usb C connection to my cell phone?
@theSaxman55 жыл бұрын
Paul, you do the best reviews and explanations of new equipment on the internet. Thanks so very much for your analysis and yes, I do trust your opinions highly, much more so than the others and totally unbiased opinions are much appreciated. Again, thank you sir.
@Nicholas-f55 жыл бұрын
DIY ADS is by far the coolest.
@jeffgilbert54195 жыл бұрын
"True first world problems" - lol
@brianb55945 жыл бұрын
Paul, excellent review and commentary! I really enjoy your style, and love these videos. Thanks for all you guys do to support GA!
@oracleovercoffee36425 жыл бұрын
Hi Paul, when i connect my iPad via wifi to an adsb device i loose the cellular data service that i pay for on the iPad. Also loose the foreflight (internet) weather data and the ability to file flight plans thru foreflight. I'm essentially connecting to a dummy wifi network on the adsb device. (1) Is there a workaround for wifi connected adsb devices to still use the cellular data service while connected? (2) which adsb devices use bluetooth? Thanks!
@AVweb5 жыл бұрын
I didn't have time to cover this, but the Stratus 3 allows this and is one of the selling points. I didn't try it because my iPad isn't cellular equipped.
@u.s.patriot34155 жыл бұрын
Great question and answer!🙏🇺🇸👍
@jovangrbic974 жыл бұрын
Your issue is just a setting on the iPad, there is a setting toggle to NOT USE cellular data *if* connected to a Wifi network (even a dummy one like the stratus). Find that setting under the cellular tab in settings, and set use cellullar data when connected to wifi!
@bobfitzgerald45983 жыл бұрын
Outstanding naration. Told my wife, --one of the best narators from Air Force to Major Air Carrier. Very profesional. Thank You Paul
@radon3605 жыл бұрын
I really don't understand why WiFi is the preferred data link for most of these. Virtually every consumer device can only be associated with only one WiFi connection at a time (regardless of whether infrastructure or ad-hoc). Bluetooth, by design for nearly a decade, allows for multiple connections simultaneously and also leaves your WiFi radio free for a data connection. Granted it's somewhat unlikely that you'll have an internet connection setup inflight, but on the ground, I've found that devices that connect over WiFi to be annoying from the standpoint that I have to choose between an internet connection and communicating with a peripheral device...whose use is often augmented by having an internet connection. Unless there's a serious bandwidth need, Bluetooth seems preferable as a data connection can be maintained while using the device. Maybe someday WiFi chipssets that allow multiple Network connections simultaneously will be commonplace in consumer devices.
@MarianKeller5 жыл бұрын
I agree, there isn't even a good reason for using WiFi instead of Bluetooth.
@marcosmota10945 жыл бұрын
A wireless network card works the same as any TCP/IP network card, and most operating systems support virtual IP addresses. A second IP address can be tacked on to the card for it to join a specific network. Just don't give it a gateway address, and your device can sit on two networks. Once Apple and Microsoft see the benefit for users, they will roll it in as a feature. (Technically an OS should be able to accept multiple gateways, but in this case you don't need it.)
@carlsonthomas5 жыл бұрын
Thank you Paul! You always provide great content. Kindly look at the Stratux if you have time. 😃
@BustedWalletGarage5 жыл бұрын
Hide 32 of those devices ( powered on ) in your buddy’s airplane , 5 in his car and just air mail about 100 of them to various airports. That shouldn’t cause any chaos
@fillipo19724 жыл бұрын
BustedWalletGarage you have raised a potential security issue that many might not have considered there. I guess Adsb transmitters would benefit from some form of authentication??
@johnpro28475 жыл бұрын
7::00 yep ..had all my stuff hit the roof several times during turbulence. Any equipment must be secured ...
@DanFrederiksen29 күн бұрын
It's almost as if primary flight displays are massively overpriced. I'm shocked.
@unggrabb5 жыл бұрын
ADSB is fantastic Swedish invention. By Håkan Lans, a genious of our time. He gave it away royalto free for shipping as the US military industrial complex tried to kill his invention off (making radar far less important etc etc).
@ozziepilot28995 жыл бұрын
Australia (CASA) is setting us (VFR pilots) up for only voluntary ADS-B , I would prefer mandated. I like what the US is doing.
@r911hendricks5 жыл бұрын
Paul Scotchford v
@joerye57005 жыл бұрын
Once you pay for that box the weather is no longer for free since you already payed in advance what a joke, no freedom that's the baton line.
@brucefox65805 жыл бұрын
@Paul Scotchford. Unfortunately, we don't have near the commercial infrastructure required to support that endeavor. Would be nice don't get me wrong. :)
@ozziepilot28995 жыл бұрын
@@brucefox6580 Yeah I know, but have a look at the link here, a bit from CASA on VFR ADS-B encouragement www.flightsafetyaustralia.com/2018/11/be-seen-and-be-safer/?fbclid=IwAR2T8Th8FIvlY3mteloVz-O_O0yckTWWyI6jjmu9s6_iR0ZbFuq0WUnD-8M
@SkylaneGuy5 жыл бұрын
You can't afford $200 for in-cockpit weather? That's less than one tank of gas in a typical Cessna. If you can't afford that, then you literally can't afford to fly.
@maxbootstrap73975 жыл бұрын
I gather from the schematic diagram of how this system works, ADS-B out and ADS-B in are of zero use or help if one is a bush/mountain/backcountry pilot flying down canyons or through mountain ranges. What I mean is, ADS-B in/receive will not hear the output signal of nearby airplanes with ADS-B out/transmit, because the ADS-B out/transmit signal is only detected by special towers and not directly by nearby ADS-B in/receive devices. That's a bit of a bummer.
@MJ-td3ij5 жыл бұрын
That should be ADS-B 2.0 but nowhere have I seen that they (the FAA) are talking about that. Having airplanes talk to other airplanes on a network (I have heard of people talking about that) shouldn't be difficult if the software is setup correctly. The transmit/receive hardware is already there. I do a lot of mountain flying with my airplane and never really fly into any controlled airspace so ADS-B is not so useful. However, during my flight training in complex airspace, ADS-B was invaluable and I really enjoyed the added information. I was able to find other aircraft much fast than: "Traffic at your 10 o'clock, low."
@maxbootstrap73975 жыл бұрын
@@MJ-td3ij : Yeah, that is what I was thinking. I too fly almost exclusively in the boonies, and like you said, airplanes with ADS-B in must be receiving ADS-B out signals from pretty much every nearby airplane within line of sight (if not slightly more). So it is a bit surprising this wasn't in version 1.0 of ADS-B.
@cd42225 жыл бұрын
Love WingX Pro! Works great with the Stratux.
@Joey44205 жыл бұрын
Paul, I always enjoy your articles and video's. Keep up the great work. One day I hope to fly my Ercoupe to Venice and talk to you over lunch at the Sun Cafe if you are available when I do make it.
@lucianonisi69872 жыл бұрын
I just purchased the Sentry unit have not yet used it - plan on using it tomorrow. I live in Canada and we use a satellite based ADS-B system. From my understanding it does not received the Canada Satellite based signals, is that correct? From my understanding it will pick up in-air aircraft that are ADS-B out.
@rn28115 жыл бұрын
Have a stratux built it for a 130 no issues so far.
@coolhari20005 жыл бұрын
R J I was looking for him to mention it as well. The built ones w ahrs is $240
@coolhari20004 жыл бұрын
@TerribleFire Does your stratux ahrs work accurately? Mine doesn't
@neilmurgatroyd31975 жыл бұрын
Thankyou Paul, I always find your reports informative and entertaining. Here in the UK we have a slightly different spin on ADS-B. uAvionix have a great product for us, but for general Electronic Conspicuity the locally produced Pilotaware is the device of choice for the cognoscenti
@RollTide85695 жыл бұрын
I did my last 2 flights with a Stratux! Its nice to see the Metars before listening to the Awos. I have yet to see radar weather on the screen, but that is because I havent flown around precip yet.
@coolhari20005 жыл бұрын
RollTide8569 how's the ahrs capability
@johnpro28475 жыл бұрын
13:07 thanks Paul ..do people still buy magazines. ?
@MadBull244 жыл бұрын
Did he say, these portable devices meet the FAA requirements?
@aelumley5 жыл бұрын
Without the "local package" it seems to me that just ADS-B In is not going to be worth the effort even if free. If you're flying along and the airplane w/Out that's headed towards you hasn't just received the local package to send to me then it's not going to work. Somebody who's knows please correct me if I'm wrong. Also you can build these from scratch with a Rasberry Pi SBC for around $100.
@SkylaneGuy5 жыл бұрын
The 'Out' signal is what triggers the 'local package' to be broadcast. So the airplane with the 'out' signal will have it for sure, as well as anyone in his vicinity that has an 'in' receiver. An 'in' only airplane may not see all other traffic now, but that situation will improve greatly once 2020 passes and most aircraft will have the 'out' signal.
@d2supplies9215 жыл бұрын
Yes, a ADSB In receiver by it self has limitations.The traffic picture will have holes. I had a Stratus ESG (complies with ADSB Out 2020) installed in my Skyhawk for about 3500 with the FAA rebate . With Foreflight and a $299 Scout I see a more complete 15 nm traffic view. The ADSB data is an aid to to good visual look out . I often have visuals on AC that I probably would not have seen without the ADSB point out. And these include situations where I maneuver before the visual to maintain separation . I have not heard many pilots that have flown an AC with In and Out that thought it was a waste of money.
@abdullah_h425 жыл бұрын
Great info.but I,m wondring if the weather works out side USA .thax
@timbacchus Жыл бұрын
Is foreflight the only software that will work? Is there a free soft ware in which to see other traffic?
@velavanlaack91343 жыл бұрын
anyone experiences loss of reception, the Dual happened twice, out of probably 10. Very disappointed. I followed your video to get the Dynon, the reception is terrible, on the ground and in the air. I compared side by side with the Garmin GDL50, the GPS accuracy is 93m, that's worse than my iPhone 7
@johnpro28475 жыл бұрын
The 'dependant' bit should be dropped..then most folk might have a chance of remembering what the heck it stands for.Some folk mix it for Attention Deficit Syndrome....
@mikemazzola6595 Жыл бұрын
While this is a bit dated, I liked it anyway. I have a Stratux and, in a previous partnership, a Stratus 3. Frankly, the FIS-B is the most important element from a safety point of view. As a regular IFR pilot flying in plenty of IMC, I've noticed that weather is what is usually trying to kill me. But TIS-B (traffic) is a very close second. And, of course, who does not like having a WAAS geo-located reference of their own location on their charts for situational awareness "only"? No one in their right mind does NOT want this. I roll my eyes at the aviation super gods that extol the virtues of a paper chart as back up. Yeah, whatever. In my flight bag I have a back up cheap iPad with the same EFB installed and my iPhone with the same. You can store your paper where the sun don't shine. The shameless plug that Paul gives himself for the article he wrote is, well, hucksterism. Entertaining hucksterism I might add.
@Rcade365 Жыл бұрын
2:23 hahahahah I’m dead that’s funny
@gmcjetpilot5 жыл бұрын
This is better than the Jet I fly... you can't use portable GPS or ADS-B because the windows block all signals.
@christophergeorge65812 жыл бұрын
Exeunt review of ADSB. Keep up the great work. Christopher from Canada retired aerostar pilot from Ottawa Canada
@johnpro28475 жыл бұрын
7:44 most LSA windows are perspex which tends to be flimsy and easily marked,...
@DrTom19462 жыл бұрын
Great job Paul thanks . You were almost over my neighborhood near North Port, Fl. our winter home.
@areza151433 жыл бұрын
Would love to see your review about the Garmin GDL51,52, thanks in advance.
@CarDocBabaPhilipo5 жыл бұрын
Great to see you Paul :)!
@latrut922 жыл бұрын
Haha the Joke at the end.
@richardtrepanier2284 жыл бұрын
Just watch Star Trek when Jean-Luc Picard showed that the federation could read the transponder signals of the Kardasian War Ships. That was twenty years back.
@garywheeler20555 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info..... 👍
@SEA-mw9zy5 жыл бұрын
Is it allowed in a commercial flight as a passenger? (Assuming you got a window seat of course.) Meaning can you use it as an “in” not “out” receiver only?
@oddsends60484 жыл бұрын
Thank you. Excellent, crystal clear explanations. After watching the Talos Avionics vids I went to the Appareo site to get info from the users manual regarding the AHRS recovery from unusual attitudes and was surprised by the dearth of information. I'd like to know if the Stratus is able to recover from a 'tumble'. Paul, as a backup AHRS it's pretty useless if it can't recover. I would want it to be bulletproof as a backup because incorrect or contradictory indications can be fatal.
@ankitpandey85052 жыл бұрын
You are awesome bro
@TheDirtflyer5 жыл бұрын
Great presentation , now I know about three ADS-B boxes. I like the Sentry, since it has a carbon Monoxide Warning feature.
@Dr.PhilParham4 ай бұрын
Paul, you've got a new FAN.....Thank you
@1pjlewis24 жыл бұрын
What happened to the Cessna 150 who had ADSB that was hit by a military plane a few years ago.
@jmryd90305 жыл бұрын
Amazing times to fly in these days. I use a Garmin GDL-50. $399 after Garmin rebate. Works great paired with Garmin Pilot.
@richardbonander15077 ай бұрын
Very good
@RIP55824 жыл бұрын
Such good information and presented clearly. Very interesting. Now if only one could fly.
@Cyberslug15 жыл бұрын
Kind of odd that Talos Avionics seems to be the best one with the most options but not many people are talking about it!!!!
@_multiverse_5 жыл бұрын
Velcro, in my katana I have it mounted in the cargo compartment with some Velcro.
@billykittner71285 жыл бұрын
Sell my plane and have more "ponies" then just rent a modern bland white plane.
@joblessalex4 жыл бұрын
For sure you could make one of these for $350 or so. $50 GPS module, $150 in transmitting equipment, and the rest in computers and voltage controller. Could easily be that small and no need to be "installed"
@kerbalairforce88023 жыл бұрын
Design, build, and get one certified for flight. Then sell your budget units for $50 over cost and make a profit.
@nomansland48112 жыл бұрын
Will this replace transponders?
@u.s.patriot34155 жыл бұрын
Anyone here heard about Foreflight moving to Android as primary operating platform? Pretty awesome news imho.
@coolhari20005 жыл бұрын
U.S. PATRIOT fake news
@danielrleo19484 жыл бұрын
Excelent..., I will repeat excelent, article...
@braintumor9434 жыл бұрын
That plane on the screen 709ch at 9:00 crashed and killed people damn near same time you filmed this I think
@JimmyLovesMundo3 жыл бұрын
The following year... aviation-safety.net/wikibase/225921
@MegaHowtoMan5 жыл бұрын
Out and IN confuse me. Its just a Wifi service right?
@kerbalairforce88023 жыл бұрын
(one year later) As an Air Force avionics technician, the OUT is your plane giving required info to ATC. The IN is your plane RECEIVING info back from other planes/weather.
@cluelessbeekeeping13224 жыл бұрын
Wow! So fucking coooool!!!!
@alberthodge6314 жыл бұрын
so if a terrorist wants to fly undetected he just turns off ads-b ??
@kerbalairforce88023 жыл бұрын
That's already a thing. Your ANG fighters will still paint targets with active radar.
@robertobeltramelli41385 жыл бұрын
Very helpful, thanks!
@michaeldangelo9924 жыл бұрын
How much would those dash units deviate the mag compass.
@hook864 жыл бұрын
It's going to depend on the aircraft and how you mount it. I wouldn't have it near the compass, as you know metal components will interfer. Probably go to the farthest right or left as possible.
@billsstudio25284 жыл бұрын
Kick ass quick summary
@ghostindamachine5 жыл бұрын
Excellent stuff!
@waqarsyed66414 жыл бұрын
Paul
@BareSphereMass5 жыл бұрын
If these dont meet FAA requirements, and you are required to have ADS-B, why buy these things?
@deandunford73365 жыл бұрын
👍
@immortaljatt055 жыл бұрын
Radar will never go away.
@machinesandthings71215 жыл бұрын
Yes, however ATC might not see it unless there is a discrepancy between it and the ADSB tracks.
@immortaljatt055 жыл бұрын
Its just an upgrade of the transponder. Its able to report back actual gps coordinates. @@machinesandthings7121
@TheJttv5 жыл бұрын
For security and safety radar will never go away. Being able to scan and locate from the ground is immensely useful.
@michaeldautry5 жыл бұрын
Radar barely works now, ATC is using transponders for nearly 100% of aircraft currently...
@flycow695 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir. You did a great job explaining the need and cost of ADSB (in and out). Keep up the good work.
@cdefilippo75 жыл бұрын
LOOK NEVER MIND ALL THAT BS !!! I'LND L STAY ON GROUND , AND TAKE THE TRAN !
@brianb55945 жыл бұрын
Carl deFilippo what fun is that?
@cdefilippo75 жыл бұрын
@@brianb5594 HI I GOT MY LICENSE AT 16 AND 18TO TAK HIGH SCHOOL KID FOR A RIDE ,BY TIME I GOT TO 20 YEARSI WOKE AND WHY AM I BURNING MY MONEY? HAD AFEW CLOSE CALLS AND LUCKY TO MAKE 20 ;THAT WAS WAY BACK 1945 TO1952...SO I QUIT, NO MORE FLYING FOR MEI DO LIKE R/C BUILDING AND FLYING SEND ME YOUR EMAIL I'LL SEND A PHOTO ………………….
@Alexgeo49755 жыл бұрын
Carl, does that make you 90+ years old? If so, good for you for staying connected on the internet. Hope I can be doing the same at that age.
@cdefilippo75 жыл бұрын
HI!@@Alexgeo4975 YES YOU GOT IT RIGHT ;SEND ME YOUR EMAIL , I'MM NOT GOOD WITH THIS MACHINE ,I'LL SEND APHOTO THAT YOU WILL MY EARLY FLYING 16 TO 18 YEARS. PS NO MEDS EVER
@brianb55945 жыл бұрын
Hey Carl, wow! That’s really something. I completely understand and it sounds like RC flying keeps you connected. God bless you sir!
@hud862 жыл бұрын
Hey, more gps tracking and loss of privacy
@AKENOXTRM3 жыл бұрын
Is there any GPS receiver that works with JEPPFD ?? For the iPad .
@trap83053 жыл бұрын
Single engine aircraft are for poor people.
@scarter1765 жыл бұрын
Key word is surveillance
@seikibrian86415 жыл бұрын
That's the raison d'être of air traffic control. Were they not keeping watch on aircraft, what would be the point?
@joerye57005 жыл бұрын
Surveillance that's I am taking about so much and for what, to go into your packet, Fed. is money hungry.
@seikibrian86415 жыл бұрын
@@joerye5700 I suggest you re-read your posts before hitting the [Enter] key.
@joerye57005 жыл бұрын
@@seikibrian8641 Is that a thread moron's if you don't like the comments don't read it.
@seikibrian86415 жыл бұрын
@@joerye5700 You missed my point. Your post doesn't make sense because it's poorly written. What does "Surveillance that's I am taking about so much" mean? And how does surveillance go into my packet? Are you trying to say the government is reaching into my pocket? Your second post is just as bad. What does "Is that a thread moron's" mean?