High Temperature Superconductors Finally Understood

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Note: One of the researchers (Shane O'Mahony) pointed out that I made a mistake and said that they used a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) but they used an Scanning Tunneling Microscope (STM). Very different techniques.

[@szilardecsenyi516]

is the hopping energy shown in the video the t hopping integral, which is included in the tight bindig model, or the full dispersion relation?

[@ScienceDiscussed]

@@szilardecsenyi516 Great question. I am not sure. I had a look over the paper again and the description didn't stand out to me. I hope you can find your answers in the paper though. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207449119

[@szilardecsenyi516]

@@ScienceDiscussed By the way, it is my old dream to experiment with copper oxide cuprates ion-implanted with lanthanoids, but I have not yet gotten around to submitting a Pathfinder-type application for this, because the existence of an international consortium (at least 3 universities) is necessary. A Hungarian university would perhaps be involved and our foundation would be the coordinator. Does that sound interesting to you?

[@ScienceDiscussed]

@@szilardecsenyi516 unfortunately I don't do research on superconductors.

[@shaneomahony2629]

Nice to see our paper getting covered! One small correction. This work uses Scanning Tunnelling Microscopy (STM) not SEM. All other explanations were on point!

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Happy to cover such amazing research. Congratulations on such a cool experiment. Sorry about the mistake, I made a classic typo while I was writing notes. Of course it was an STM. I will write a note in the description.

[@jerryli5555]

they know nothing about stm

[@lifeisgood339]

​@@jerryli5555Nothing seems a bit hyperbolic

[@owlredshift]

This channel is volatile. Because some day it will explode. Because it's so good.

[@andrewbodor4891]

When the internal parts of matter are slowed down by cooling, instead of being or having a neutral charge, they repel magnets. Is this what you are saying?

[@andrewbodor4891]

When the internal parts of matter by cooling, instead of being neutral, they repel magnets. Is this what you are saying?

[@owlredshift]

Thanks for all your work, research, and consistency.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

No problem. Glad you are enjoying it.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Also I didn't see that you donated some money. Thank you very much. I am glad that you enjoyed the video this much.

[@Tom06]

Thank you for putting together such an interesting and informative video. I am currently researching potential topics for a 5k word school project and superconductors seem the most interesting to me. In terms of the title, was thinking something along the lines of “feasibility and applications of high temp superconductors”. Do you think that this would be a good idea or maybe the physics is too advanced and it should be avoided since there is ongoing research? Any advice would be greatly appreciated

[@ScienceDiscussed]

I think you could do a school project on superconductors but it might be easier to focus on the history and uses for them. The physics itself can get complicated quickly the more you devel into them.

[@marcusrosales3344]

Love the subject, but I'm a bit biased... I'm going to say it: we do not understand high-Tc SC yet. Some click bait! The pairing mechanism could be different for different materials first of all. Also, the cuprates underlying structure have many mysteries too. They may have some interesting SC phases, which resembles a Larkin-Ovchinnikov state, where the order parameter has a density wave pattern in the absence of a magnetic field, a pair-density-wave. This is like a non-zero COM momentum for our Cooper pairs. There's alot more to understand...

[@Szymoonkk]

Seriously thank you, was gonna say the same. We definitely do not understand high-Tc sc. There are a lot more mysteries. For sure, presence on social media requires you to make click baits, but this does not mandate saying "We are relatively confident, that superexchange is the mechanism". That is not true, you can't be anyway near confident after one study confirms one, specific prediction. Anyway, I'm still happy that someone speaks about superconductivity on youtube.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Yeah to be honest you make good points that are also raised by the authors. The results do point toward superexchange being one method of induced high tc superconductivity but there may be more. The authors also suggest that there could be mechanisms that just look the same as superexchange in their Sensing modality. Either way it is a cool result but sometimes these nuances are missing when I summarise results for a video.

[@scientifyessential1059]

Good information

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Glad you liked it.

[@ian6083]

Thanks very much for making a video on this information!

[@patrickhendron6002]

Years later: "We just combined low temp & high temp scm's to make a room temp one"

[@frun]

Can quantum simulators solve superconductivity? I heard, standard model can be simulated on a lattice.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Potentially, but we need to know what to simulate to begin with. A quantum simulator would look at interaction and what physics manifests from these. So we need to know what interactions to simulate. That is why these results are so interesting for the future.

[@michaelregan2419]

Wonderful. Thank you very much.

[@TorqueFormulaWon]

Thank you that was very interesting. I can't say I understand very well even though it was explained. I am tired though. The whole quantum world is amazing and I've never heard of phonon's before. I'd love to be answering a question on a game show like pointless and give an answer to "particles ending with the suffix - on" then pretend I didn't know any, but say "I wish I had my phonon me". Sorry that's probably not very funny and joked about before but oh well! I did read an article about charge density waves. Are they a promising field for the furtherment of superconducting at room temperature? I see someone mentioned the angle of your video but it wasn't too bad. A slight adjustment maybe but not distracting for me anyway. I appreciate the research. Also, someone claims to have a room temperature superconductor but aren't being taken seriously. Is it possible to entangle the sun? I'm just wondering as that is what they say and I'm not accusing them of making it up. The quantum world is very "spooky".

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Glad you enjoyed the video and I enjoyed your joke. I don't know much about charge density waves so I am not sure about this one. The room temperature superconductor paper was retracted in the end. So as far as most scientists are concerned we have not proven this is possible yet.

[@suhendiabdulah6061]

@@ScienceDiscussed honestly i dont understand much about superconductor material things. but if heat is magnetic force how can we get material room temperature? You know that its imposible with proton and neutron pair to reduce its magnetic force to zero unless we get anti neutron and anti proton that we alone cant get

[@nobitataweel7848]

I'm surprised you didn't mention coherent laser and superconductivity!!

[@shohamsen8986]

Interesting material, but click baitey and bordering on the side of dishonet. We do not know High Temp SC. Scientists would be very careful to make these claims.

[@samanthajenkins2399]

Thanks for the video. So Super-exchange could be probed by understanding the distribution of the valance electrons around the atoms and these intermediate atoms may not be "atoms" in the conventional sense but non-nuclear attractors which occur in systems such as lithium where the electronic charge density is sparse..

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Yes exactly!

[@Iowa599]

If copper oxide is a superconductor, why is corrosion on copper terminals (aka: "the blue death", a copper oxide) an insulator?

[@ScienceDiscussed]

The exact formation of the atoms and the type of oxide matter. Also these materials containing copper oxide were only superconducting at extremely low temperatures.

[@shizumi5243]

Didn’t we already get to room temperature quantum computers? Quantum Brilliance has a commercially available room temperature diamond-based quantum computer.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Not quite. Quantum brilliance has promised this but I haven't seen the devices yet.

[@shizumi5243]

@@ScienceDiscussed “The Quantum Brilliance Gen1 Model is now commercially available.” I quoted that from their website.

[@ScienceDiscussed]

@@shizumi5243 Yes but this isn't a universal quantum computer. I happen to personally know both the CEO and CSO of the company and I do research on nitrogen vacancies diamond, which is what they uses. They have a lot of great applications to quantum computers. Some of which quantum brillance are trying to acheive. But they are a long way off having a usable quantum computer with a large number of qubits.

[@conductiveironmeteorite]

Nice

[@zhongyuan2563]

let's see how korean make it come ture lol

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Yes some very interesting results from that group. I have heard some strong scepticism about the results but I haven't read into it each.

[@ikxfgymcim8384]

@@ScienceDiscussed several replications with interesting effects and this kzbin.info/www/bejne/hWfZg4GXd8loea8 author seems confident :)

[@kayakMike1000]

No, electrons don't band together. Thats crazy talk. Its a crystal lattice that constructs some places where the wave function of valence electrons span a fairly long distance. You gotta cool them down enough because if the atoms wiggle around too much the channels close. Ybco has fairly big channels, but its kinda brittle. Niobium titanate is very flexible but had small channels, so you gotta cool it down to liquid helium.

[@smallmoneysalvia]

I really like the information and communication style, but I’m getting really distracted by your hand movements. I think this is because it takes up so much of the frame, not that you’re gesticulating. I think it’s exaggerated by your camera setup - the upward angle puts your hands in the extreme bottom of the frame AND closer to the lens, and the wide angle lens causes distortions in this area that increase the amount of the frame taken up by your hands compounding this. If you want to reduce this effect, I would suggest trying to get the camera further from you, higher up, and potentially with a longer focal length to even things out a bit. This is a personal preference here, and I totally understand if it’s not feasible in your working space or budget or any other reason for that matter. In any case, great work, I like your content and will be subscribing!

[@ScienceDiscussed]

Great feedback. I will try some of these suggestions. Sitting a little further back and putting my camera on a box might help a lot. Thanks

[@ikxfgymcim8384]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/gKvShp-fmc-gacU who's gonna tell him?

[@anthonyzabala2093]

Here fun

[@AllSun369]

I've developed a high temperature superconductor but no one seems to care. I want to entangle it with our sun to develope compact nuclear fusion generators. I see it's uses in electricity, communications, and internet are limitless. Add to that quantum computational machines and I see a beautiful future with my high temp quantumly entangled superconductors. If only I could get anyone to take them seriously

[@nzuckman]

What's it made of? Have you produced any samples that demonstrate superconductivity? What's the critical temperature? I promise people will be interested if you can provide concrete evidence of its existence.

[@AllSun369]

@@nzuckman I've only produced samples in my lab and it's not patented yet but I'm now working with open AI and Lawrence Livermore Labs to make use of it... All good things in all good time I suppose thank you I will keep you informed

[@MrFleischFloete]

@@AllSun369 Is it compatible with the cloud? I would like to invest my bitcoin. Can you open a kickstarter plz?

[@AllSun369]

@@nzuckman I'm sorry I can not tell you now I wish I could

[@AllSun369]

@@nzuckman I've just finished 5 experiments proving it's validity.

[@krishnaraoragavendran7592]

arXiv:2108.03655 [pdf] cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.str-el doi10.1073/pnas.2207449119 On the Electron Pairing Mechanism of Copper-Oxide High Temperature Superconductivity Authors: S. M. O'Mahony, Wangping Ren,Weijiong Chen, Yi Xue Chong, Xiaolong Liu,H. Eisaki, S. Uchida, M. H. Hamidian, J. C. Seamus Davis 6:58

[@anupkuttan9187]

Thanks