When Uyghurs Ruled China | Uyghur Khaganate Documentary

[@HikmaHistory]

Could you see a scenario in the future where the Uyghurs of Xinjiang get some sort of an autonomous state? Medieval History Playlist: kzbin.info/aero/PLiPhmAD3I2JzCm2huELM5moDOPkP-EWNZ

[@kevzortd8073]

Maybe a independent state when China breaks up

[@beepboop204]

Confused Idealist Canadian Noises WHY CANT THEY ALL JUST GET ALONGGGGGG

[@kuroazrem5376]

I do. Long live East Turkestan. This will come when China inevitably collapses.

[@kevzortd8073]

@@beepboop204 cuz history

[@beepboop204]

😒@@kevzortd8073

[@nomadenjoyer]

The reason that the Türks and other Turkic nomads were formidable warriors was that they were horse-archers. A horse-archer specifically denotes a mounted warrior armed with a bow who can shoot from horseback while riding. The Turkic nomadic warriors as well as the Mongols used the composite bow, which was made of horn, wood, and sinew. The composite bow was more accurate and had a better range and rate of fire than muskets and early firearms. The tactical principles of the Turkic horse-archers were based on the combination of fire power and mobility. yhe nomadic horse-archers shot in volleys, weakening the enemy before they charged. Ideally, they practiced "fire power in movement" like modern armies.Other things being equal, the horse-archers were often almost unbeatable on the open battlefields. Against them, sedentary soldiers were often helpless until the development of efficient battlefield handguns, including the repeating firearms (the firearms that could be fired repeatedly before being manually reloaded) in the seventeenth century.

[@user-op8fg3ny3j]

Basically blitzkrieg

[@AL_AFGHANI1]

Nobody asked

[@stratospheric37]

@@user-op8fg3ny3j No, what are you talking about

[@AbdulAlhazred-l2l]

Formidable? Are you kidding me? Turks are originally from central Asia. They lose all the way now Turkey is right beside Europe. Half of old Turks lost to China and mix with Chinese. So call Ottoman "empire" got ass kicked by Vlad the Impaler become Turkish kebab🤣🤣🤣

[@malinyamato]

sam as those of Manchuria and the Hussars of Hungary and the Hellenistic Macedonians -- mounted warfare has been instrumental in forming empires, the only exception being the Romans. muslims started out as mounted robbers and emerged towards large armies of mounted looters and robbers -- during that time the adaption of improved stirrups made mounted warfare even more lethal.

[@nenenindonu]

The Uighurs have probably one of the oldest Turkic tribal ethnonyms along with the Kyrgyz, Khalaj, and Volga Tatars who identify as Bulgars

[@AL_AFGHANI1]

Volga bulgars who identify as tatars*

[@middleeastrenwarriormen1017]

now,Khalaj life in Afghanistan called ( Ghilzai ) and West Khorasan still called : Khalaj Tork

[@muhammadadeel8639]

What happened to karluks? Which country do they reside in today?

[@middleeastrenwarriormen1017]

@@muhammadadeel8639 Karluk and Uighur was separated ethnic,Karluk from Karluk Yabghu and Kara Khanid

[@vx8431]

I'm not sure Orkhon Uyghurs are the same as modern Uyghurs as after the fall of the Okrhon Uyghur Khanate fell they were under various rulers.

[@woodensurfer]

The Uyghurs have never ruled China. They fought with Tang to suppress AnShi rebellion, and then later they were in a favorable position in extracting trade advantages from a weaken Tang. The poet BeiJuYi wrote a vivid poem on how much Tang was willing to exchange for emaciated horses from the Uyghurs.

[@yangjuguang]

for the anti-China propaganda, totally made up history

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

but chinese were scared of Uyghurs that time. and they also ruled North part of China, or it's not China?

[@woodensurfer]

A small part of today's China. @@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat

[@Han-is-slave]

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisboratcertainly only small part of northwestern . You don’t know the definition and range of North China.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

@@Han-is-slave It's also included as Northern part.

[@reeyees50]

8:00 Manichean religion at that time and place was heavily characterized as being severly blended with Christian beliefs. So these early uyghur ruler could be considered to be a Christian. And if we want to go even further, potential candidate for the prester john myth of later medieval times.

[@AltaicGigachad]

Xin Tangshu 新唐書 (217: 6111) says that the ancestors of Huihe 回紇 (Uiġurs) are the Xiongnu 匈奴 (Huns).

[@middleeastrenwarriormen1017]

Uyghur from Tiele Confrederation

[@janetmontgomery-r6j]

I read that too, it seems possible. There's many connections between people's of the steppes and goturk empires and surrounding countries

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Uyghurs were closer to Altaic populations

[@Odasakuismylife]

​@@Austine1452Turkics live in Central Asia, so Central Asia and Kurds are completely unrelated, the place they want to establish in Iran, Iraq, Turkey, Syria is very different bruh 💀

[@AltaicGigachad]

Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.

[@AL_AFGHANI1]

Who asked

[@YusufNasihi]

Tarihi çevir nal sesi, kısrak sesi bunlar

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@sitarampradhan8488]

Yeah those Maniacs killed lot of humans, ransacked lot of cities and spread new diseases.

[@vajraheart6052]

Turkic and Turk, the people of Turkey and Ottoman are different and don’t get confused.

[@user-ym8lz3yj8l]

14:30-14:51 your information is wrong the Uyghur in Uyghurstan(Xinjiang) were living in Uyghurstan before the collapse of Uyghur Khanate in North Asia... Uyghurstan(Xinjiang) were under control of western Turkic Khanate before Tang Dynasty came and make it protected areas by help of Turk clans and the Arabs sent missions to the Turk Khanate in all Central Asia and reached Turfan city in Uyghurstan in 692 AD and he said the Turks people live there.. the reason for the Battle of Talas in 751 AD is that China Tang Dynasty wanted to make all of Central Asia a protection area and he even took areas under control of the Abbasid Empire in Afghanistan and make it protected areas. when China Tang Dynasty was defeated in the Battle of Talas in 751 AD between the Arab Abbasid Empire and the Turk clans that were with China Tang Dynasty but switched to the Abbasid Empire side and the Tibetan Empire against China Tang Dynasty, Uyghur Khanate in North Asia annexed the majority areas of Uyghurstan and the Tibetan Empire took back Gansu, Qinghai and other Provinces and took some areas of Uyghurstan. After that, the Uyghur Khanate and the Tibetan Empire fought over Uyghurstan and there was an agreement to hand over the Uyghurstan areas that under Tibetan Empire to the Uyghur Khanate because this is Uyghur regions... btw the Abbasid Empire sent a messenger to the Turk clans in 750 AD before Talas battle in 751 AD asked the Turks to fight with Abbasid Empire against China Tang Dynasty but they refused and maybe that's why these Turk clans switched to the Abbasid Empire side against China Tang Dynasty when Talas battle began in 751 AD. After that came the Kyrgyz Khanate and took control of Uyghurstan and overthrew the Uyghur Khanate... it's the same thing some Western thinkers and historians think that the Arabs came to Iraq after the Arab conquest of Iraq in 7th century and Iraq at that time was under the control of the Persian Sassanid Empire, but this is not true because iraqi Arab tribes lived in Iraq before the Arab conquest Iraq in 7th century and the Iraq army of Persian Sassanid Empire was consisted of Iraqi Arab tribes and Iraqi Syriacs that fought the Arab in 7th century... The difference between the Uyghur in Uyghurstan and the Uyghur Khanate in North Asia is that The Uyghurs in Uyghurstan the majority of them were Buddhists unlike the Uyghurs in North Asia who are Tengrism( like Shamanism). The Uyghurs in Uyghurstan are agricultural and shepherds and not like Uyghurs in North Asia nomads who depend on animal shepher only... historically when a delegation of Arabs headed to China sent by the Abbasid ruler of the Abbasid Empire to meet China Emperor and with merchants they passed through Kashgar city in 847 AD, they said the ruler of Kashgar city was from the Uyghur Khan and the people living there was Uyghurs and Kashgar city at that time was the capital of Uyghurstan and Uyghurstan were part of the Karakhanid Empire that founded in 840 AD which consisted of Uyghurstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.. and last Uyghur Buddhist Khanate in Uyghurstan was Kara Khoja Khanate after that Genghis Khan came and some Uyghur Khan ruler of Karakhanid Empire and some Uyghur Khan KaraKhoja Khanate allied with Genghis Khan

[@tcxnt5442]

This title is very misleading, Uyghur Khaganate never ruled any part of China, they were allies of the Tang dynasty and they were not regarded as a threat compared with Tibetans. After the Uyghur Khaganate was destroyed by the Kyrgyz their main branch fled south, trying to intimidate Tang but they were easily crushed by a declining Tang, and all of their people were brought to China and sinicized.

[@kongwee1978]

ETIM alway try to twist history in KZbin.

[@tcxnt5442]

@@kongwee1978 Also, most of the "bribes" decribed in the video was negotiated and settled by the Tang and Uyghurs before the battle. Tang considered paying someone else to fight cost-effective, especially by using the loots from rebellious cities because a large part of China was actually not controlled by Tang and constantly challenging Tang's authority after the Anlushan rebellion.

[@tcxnt5442]

@@kongwee1978 I thought they were going to talk about the "GanZhou Uyghur" Which was a small Kingdom founded by a branch of fleeing Uyghurs who occupied the city of Ganzhou(Zhangye) after the chaotic break up of the Tibetan Empire.

[@kongwee1978]

@@tcxnt5442 All these "history" just to serve the "legitimate" right for ETIM to be independent especially in Xinjiang. Just like Kurds in the Middle East.

[@tcxnt5442]

​@@kongwee1978 However the Uyghurs are mongoloids and wasn't the indigenous inhabitants of Xinjiang. Muslims wiped off the original Indo-European culture in the Tarim Basin (also the Buddhist and Manichean Uyghurs) is a tragedy should be told

[@nenenindonu]

The Ilkhanate successor entity of Jalayirids are hypothesized to be remnants of the Uighur Yaglakar clan

[@nomadenjoyer]

The Jalair Possibly of the Turkic ancestry, this group of people were captured by the Timuchin's clan and became vassals. In early days, this group of people raided the pasture of rich Mongol woman, Monolun (wife of the grandson of Bodunchar), and killed her and her eight sons. Only Kaidu was saved by his uncle Nachin and later Kaidu defeated the Jalair to be a leader of the early Mongol people. The Jalairs became very much attached to the Mongol people in the ensuing years. Later, they became vassals and got assimilated Muhuali or Mukali was said to be one of them. The Jalairs were said to be of the Darligin Mengwu tribe and fled west to the Kerulen River after being attacked by the Khitans. Alternatively speaking, Jalair (Zha-la-yi-er) was listed together with Zu-bu and Zhu-bu- gu, i.e., Dadan equivalent, in Liao Shi (history of the Khitan Liao dynasty), which were considered a Huihe (Uygur) tribal alliance since the days the Huihe expelled the Kirghiz from the Orkhon River and Tu'ula River area and rebelled against the Khitans throughout the 10th-11th centuries, with Mo-gu-si Khan launching a Zu-bu dynasty in A.D. 1100 in defiance of the Khitans. That is, the Jalair shared the same ancestry as the Keraits who possessed a Nestorian Mo-gu-si (Marcus in Ecclesiastical Chronicle) - who was a different person from Kerait chieftain Wang-han (Toghrul)'s grandfather Margus Buiruk per Historian Zhou Liangxiao for the generations' lapse.

[@nomadenjoyer]

Other tribes in the region included the Jalair, said to have originated as a band of Turkish refugees, who lived between the Merkits and the Keraits; the Onggirats in the far southeast; and the Ongguts, who at some unknown date had migrated south of the Gobi Desert as far as the borders of China, but still maintained contacts with their relatives further north.

[@nenenindonu]

​@@nomadenjoyerIt would be another case of re-Turkification similar to that of the Naimans, but what's more interesting here is that the Jalayirids were Oghuz Turkified unlike other then-Mongol groups that usually assimilated into Karluk & Kipchak populations

[@AltaicGigachad]

@@nomadenjoyer The Jalairs were said to be of the Darligin Mengwu tribe and fled west to the Kerulen River after being attacked by the Khitans. Alternatively speaking, Jalair (Zha-la-yi-er) was listed together with Zu-bu and Zhu-bu- gu, i.e., Dadan equivalent, in Liao Shi (history of the Khitan Liao dynasty), which were considered a Huihe (Uygur) tribal alliance since the days the Huihe expelled the Kirghiz from the Orkhon River and Tu'ula River area and rebelled against the Khitans throughout the 10th-11th centuries, with Mo-gu-si Khan launching a Zu-bu dynasty in A.D. 1100 in defiance of the Khitans. That is, the Jalair shared the same ancestry as the Keraits who possessed a Nestorian Mo-gu-si (Marcus in Ecclesiastical Chronicle) - who was a different person from Kerait chieftain Wang-han (Toghrul)'s grandfather Margus Buiruk per Historian Zhou Liangxiao for the generations' lapse.

[@middleeastrenwarriormen1017]

@@nenenindonuNaiman,Oirat,Jalayir,Chuban,Borjigin in Turkmenistan,Iran,Azerbaijan,Iraq,Eastern Syria durring Ilkhanid turned Turkmenization

[@mohamednazir913]

Great work , thank you.

[@HistoryoftheUmmah]

May Allah SWT make it easier for our Uyghur brothers and sisters.

[@charvaka9526]

Afraid that it won't be Allah. But, hope for better times indeed.

[@kongwee1978]

Our uyghur brothers and sister is happy with CPC thanks to Allah.

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@weishi9804]

It was forced on them with corpse of 1/2 million holy warrior.

[@peterzou6961]

Hope they will not be another Pakistan with lots of chaos.

[@bigsarge2085]

Learned something new!

[@Artur_M.]

Fascinating topic!

[@charvaka9526]

Nice, and great visuals.

[@cubbelicommando]

The noblest of these nations that were not interested in science are the Chinese and the Turks. The Chinese are the largest of the peoples by number, the most imposing by kingdom, and the most considerable by territory. The domains they occupy are in the eastern parts of the inhabited world, between the equinoctial line to the extreme of the seven climates to the north. His share in knowledge (ma'rifa) is to surpass all nations in mastery of handicrafts and perfection of graphic arts. They are the most suffered of men in the prolonged effort, which the improvement of the works [supposes], as well as in enduring the harshness of the penalties in the perfection of the arts (sana'i"). As for the Turks, [they] also form a great nation with numerous troops and an imposing kingdom. The domains they inhabit are found between the eastern regions of Juräsän, [on the side] of the Islamic empire, the western regions of China, northern India, and the extreme north of the inhabited world. Their virtue is that they stand out and achieve supremacy in doing war, as well as in the elaboration of weapons; for they are the most skilful of men in horsemanship and [warfare] tactics, and the keenest of eyes for spearing, striking with the sword, and shooting arrows. Ahmad, A.S. ibn and Salgado, M.F. (1999) Libro de las categorías de las naciones: Vislumbres desde el islam clásico sobre la filosofía y la ciencia. Tres cantos: Akal., p.43

[@SacredDreamer]

Thank You so much for sharing . I was drawn in reading every word

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan 😊

[@AlMuqaddimahYT]

Why are you uploading at 3 in the morning?!

[@Anderson-f4t6c]

Didn't expect you here

[@unusualhistorian1336]

Excellent documentary Hikma, keep it up!

[@Religions.of.fandom]

I was the 1000th like😅🤲🏼♥️

[@abhinavpatil759]

It's weird to conflate the Uyghur Khaganate with modern Uyghurs. No one in modern times used that term to refer to any presently living people until about 100 years ago, including the Uyghurs themselves. It is anachronistic to conflate them; it would be like conflating Ukrainians with the proto-Indo Europeans or Sumerians with Iraqis. Actually a better example would be conflating Ghana and irs people with the Empire of Ghana; the modern state/people intentionally named themselves afrer the ancient empire, but they're not the same in any meaningful or useful way.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

In short, it is hard to think of any other ethnolinguistic entity in history that conquered so vast a territory and founded so many empires and states, also contributing to world civilizations. The history of the Turkic peoples was an important factor in world history for more than a millennium until the emergence of Europe as the world's dominant power. What happened in the Turkic world often affected the history of China, Central Asia, the Middle East, South Asia, and Europe. One may also argue that world history began with the "Turko-Mongol" empire created by Chinggis Khan. In the contemporary world, Turkic-speaking nations form six states (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkey/Türkiye) and several "autonomous" units in Russia (the republics of Chuvash, Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Altai, Khakassia, Tuva, and Sakha) and China (the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Turkic peoples also reside as minority groups in several other countries, including Mongolia and Iran, among others. It would therefore be difficult to acquire a comprehensive understanding of world history as well as our present world without studying the history of the Turkic peoples.

[@dogukan127]

olm amma circlejerk yapıyorsunuz

[@Austine1452]

FREE KURDISTAN

[@dirckthedork-knight1201]

The amount of Turkish Ultra Nationalistic butchering of history in this enough to make an observation balloon go to space

[@jt-ttt]

even Mongols have their own writing system, but ... 😂

[@namAlexander]

love this channel on arab history instead of twisted history some Muslims come out with some just cant or wont believe real history, this is why i subbed a bit back, if it wasn't for Islamite's or any other people like that and it don't matter what race the world would be a better place, iran seem tobe getting sick of it and other arab states

[@kanatbekdzhanbekuulu1833]

I am Kyrgyz and I love my Uyghur brothers ❤❤❤

[@peekaboopeekaboo1165]

Do not believe the lies about Uyghur "genocide", "ethnic cleansing" and "forced labor" .

[@nicholaskazan275]

You have no idea about your national poem, Manas!

[@azmatsaypidin1814]

I am uighur and uighurs and kirgiz are brothers.. we are one family..

[@kanatbekdzhanbekuulu1833]

@@nicholaskazan275 oh really than tell me about our Manas poem what’s a relationship between Kyrgyz and Uighur people

[@azmatsaypidin1814]

@nicholaskazan275 that is great poem collection

[@leviturek5015]

CK2 helped me reconize the names of some of the nations and people you mention lol. Like karluk.

[@espiao7343]

The question I thought you would answer is: when did the uyghurs converted to islam?

[@badmashdogesh3939]

Your title is quite misleading. Uyghurs never ruled China. They only controlled parts of modern China, not Tang China. Tang was battling internal rebellions at the time, which significantly weakened the empire, and the Uyghurs just took advantage of this weak Tang.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

rulef

[@zacharylewis6108]

Xi Xia. Never ruled all of China. The Han & Jurchens kept them in check. And the theres Dali Kingdom.

[@McVaySwifty]

Another fascinating doc, thanks!

[@layalk.7782]

Can you please state your sources in the info box.

[@yangjuguang]

sources: trust me bro

[@edwingan1988]

Do one on "When the Red Indians ruled America" 😂

[@watchshowman9664]

since when? btw uyghurs was not even the majority at present area in history. there were many fractions then. they do concentrate at around these territories the last 1000years.. kazahs, kyrgrz,tartars ,tibetans , tufan. They are majority now but not simple majority.

[@anuragpoddar8631]

How many of y'all heard about genocide of turkic muslims in mid 19th century china that left 5 million people dead?

[@WarBrickproductions]

I have, the Qing hated anyone who was not Manchu

[@kazan2081]

Tell us more.

[@WarBrickproductions]

@@kazan2081 The qing did a lot of genocides, against many ethnic groups not just the Uyghurs.

[@kazan2081]

@WarBrickproductions where can I read more on this. Plus I read the qing were not Chinese but manchu.

[@WarBrickproductions]

@@kazan2081 If you look it up you should be able to, maybe look up Qing Genocides or look on Britannica/Wikipedia

[@user-ym8lz3yj8l]

5:11 Sogdia and Ferghana is only a place or country name and not name for group of people or ethnicities... the majority of the people were living in Sogdia and Ferghana were Turks but sometimes the rulers were mixed Persian Turk with Persian Culture or Turk with Persian Culture or Turk and that's what makes things confusing.. So my point of view is that the ruler in the country is not necessarily have to be from the same ethnicity as the people in the country... For example, Sogdia was consisted of Samarkand and Bukhara cities and the ruler of Bukhara was a Turk woman and She inherited the rule from her husband Khan who died and because her son was young and could not rule and her title was Khatun and it's Turk title for the ruler, and the Arabs did not want to overthrow her or conquer her because she rule her Turk people and even the Arab signed a peace treaty with her and even when this Turk Khatun woman broke the peace treaty by helping the Gokturk Empire to attack the Arabs.. the Arabs forgave her and in one time she broke the peace treaty again but the Arabs knew that she was influenced by someone so the Arab leader in Central Asia decided entered Bukhara city and The Arab leader in Central Asia region asked this Turk Khatun woman to send him people as a guarantee for implemente the peace agreement and she was so smart too and know what's going so she sent him 80 Turk people of Bukhara city who were at the forefront of those who rebelled against her and whom she feared would betray her and threaten her throne. Thus, she got rid of the most dangerous enemy to her throne, in her present, and her future, and the Arabs were admired her by her justice rule and wisdom and the Arabs knew she was a good woman and ruler and even one of the Arab newly appointed leaders in Central Asia region brought his wife with him to show her this Turk Khatun woman.. the problem is when mixed Persian Turk with Persian culture or Turk withe Persian Culture took over Bukhara by a coup against the son of Turk Khatun woman and he inherited the rule after his mother Khatun death and in Samarkand too and these mixed Persian Turk even brought Zoroastrianism religion with them because some of Bukhara and Samarkan people were Buddhist and the Arabs thought they're what remains of Persian Sassanid Empire and after that the Arabs decided to conquer Bukhara and Samarkan and Ferghana and make this region under Abbasid Empire because the Arabs wanted to end what remained of influence of Sassanid Empire who fled to Central Asia... Many of people who came to Abbasid Empire from Sogdia(Bukhara and Samarkan) and Ferghana were Turks and even there was famous Turk commander from Ferghana ruled Egypt.. for example, some Western thinkers and historians think that the Arabs came to Iraq after the Arab conquest of Iraq in 7th century and Iraq at that time was under the control of the Persian Sassanid Empire, but this is not true because iraqi Arab tribes lived in Iraq before the Arab conquest Iraq in 7th century and the Iraq army of Persian Sassanid Empire was consisted of Iraqi Arab tribes and Iraqi Syriacs that fought the Arab in 7th century...

[@aseemawad4294]

Overall Uyghurs have performed a role similar to Cossacks. Not quite Chinese, until brought in the fold by CPC, but serving China as military auxiliary.

[@lerneanlion]

Will you continued into the time of Western Xia and see how the Uyghurs lived their lives under the rule of the Emperors of Western Xia?

[@AltaicGigachad]

The Turks were considered as the best warriors due to their horsemanship and skill in archery. Kaushik Roy., n.d. Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400-1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships (Bloomsbury Studies in Military History). p.24. While there is much more than this to the Turks, it is true that Turks rank among history’s great empire-builders and rulers. Under the Ottomans they conquered vast territories in the Balkans and the Middle East and ruled for six hundred years. Turkey Country Study Guide Volume 1 Strategic Information and Developments pp.30 The Turks can be killed, but they can never be conquered. Napoleon in his own words from the French of Jules Bertaut p.44

[@AL_AFGHANI1]

Nobody asked

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@sitarampradhan8488]

No Mongols were best Maniac warriors.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@sitarampradhan8488yes but their army was mostly Turkic too

[@brianticas7671]

@@sitarampradhan8488 the Mongols gave turkey their culture right?

[@subhranshuganguly2246]

One thing is certain. Traditional Chinese emperors were more powerful than Hindus. They did not bow down to Turks nor Europeans.

[@brianticas7671]

Please the Chinese always got beat up man. Gtfo here man.

[@angerycamel2]

What part of this video actually shows a Uygher conquest or rule of china? Terrible tittle for the video.

[@arrivederciheheeeeee5809]

i should warn you if youre muslim as music is haram as confirmed by many hadiths

[@adachou]

Interesting alternative view of the traditional China centric history 👍🏻

[@mrmr446]

Manichaeism is derived from Greek so the 'ch' is pronounced as a 'k' which is easier to enunciate, I think the title doesn't need the last word as it could be misleading. An interesting chapter in central Asian history.

[@magma9000]

Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰❤️

[@FORYOU-g4n]

Sultan Ertuğrul söğüte 400 çadırla geldi osmanli imparatorlugunu kurdu İstanbul da çindeki gibi bir set değil üç set vardı gemiler karadan yürütüldü uygurlar üç Oğuzlar bizler dokuz Oğuzlar tabiki kurulacak ama herseyin bir zamanı var kurt yediği ayazı asla unutmaz

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Tokuz Oghuz aren't Oghuz ... they were Uyghurs, just Oghuz khan call them Tokuz Oghuz

[@albertwong1919]

The future of XInjiang is forever tied to China as it is with Taiwan. There is no way and its impossible for Xinjiang to be an autonomous state not even like Hong Kong as a one country two system pledge since Xinjiang was never autonomous and the entire region is in a very important location with rich mineral resources to be an autonomous state. If Xinjiang ever become an autonomous region that what is happening now in the Ukraine war will happen to Xinjiang because its 100% certain that the US thru the CIA will destabilize and than put in their people in Xinjiang for independence and this will be a very bad situation for China and I dont think the chinese leaders are stupid or shortsighted to not see this and understand this possibility.

[@manuelestrella9107]

Salute

[@Sol_Invictus-h9n]

He’s name is not Bayanchur it’s Bayan-Ochir Bayan meaning rich Ochir meaning mace or a staff

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Someone says he is Moyanchur

[@jasemalhammadi4228]

There are also the Han chinese muslims which are called “Hui people” who converted to islam through persian merchants who traveled up the silk road to China. they have a distinct culture within china and the chinese government is less hostile to the them than the Uighurs. It’s worth learning about their history.

[@Alejandro-te2nt]

The videos of hui dhikr on youtube are very cool.

[@xyz-hx5dh]

If Muslim collaborate with foreign enemies to destabilise the country then country will be hostile to such people .

[@peekaboopeekaboo1165]

False and fake news. PRC government is not "hostile" towards Muslim ethnic groups.

[@parttimethinker7611]

It’s because they (Hui) helped the Chinese emperor defeated the invading forces. They were hailed as great contributors to the China. The Chinese emperor built 2 great mosques in commemorate of their contributions to defend China. It’s like the U.S., after the “black American “ helped the Union side fought the southerner ( rebels). And ww2, the black American were granted recognition as important. Even though they were still heavily discriminated against by the white American. Everyone appreciates friendship, no matter which race of country.

[@jeremyhanton4467]

Its a shame that they live in their current situation with 0 support from the umah

[@jvharbin8337]

Great doc full of info

[@dennischai4831]

Festering discontent is your goal. Why the sudden interest in Uyrghers.

[@xp7575]

This is a history channel, he covers all sorts of different historical topics

[@whosthatguy8396]

Festering discontent? KZbin is banned in china

[@User-kjxklyntrw]

Uyghur anchestors were from Sino Tibetan at ancient yellow river valley Civilization that get a little mutation because migrate to different kind of terrain and climate for long generations. What happen in the past actually unification of big family that splitted thousand years before.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

🤣🤣🤣 Uyghur ancestors were Altaic... And modern day Uyghurs have some Indo European mix and Ancient Uyghur

[@User-kjxklyntrw]

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat I know , but it closely related to ancient Civilization society of China yellow river basin, do u think human came from stone, human came from human, closed to them, a little bit mutation are not mean the Difference and separate them, i give u example one clumps of grass with one root, one blade of grass of it green color, and blade of grass of it yellow, does it mean they are differences make them different in root, no, they still one clumps of grass with one same root. U don't know they was closely related to ancient Chinese yellow river valley Civilization, that why they live as neighbour because they actually family. If u just cut the scene of only 1000 year ago u said this is different kingdom, but if u see further u will understand they live so closed because they related so close before as family, and now they back to be a family, so why want distract that harmony, don't, let they live peacefully, they deserve it.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

@@User-kjxklyntrw They aren't related to chinese, you just assimilating their genome

[@rolandrabier5984]

Had the Uyghurs chosen Shamanism, Buddhism or Christianity they would not be seen as trouble makers and could blend easely in today China.

[@kamer-sing]

the troublemakers are American Christians, China's biggest enemy, and Christians will never live in China.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Being Muslim is saving them from that shit. but in Central Asia they separating and assimilating by other Muslims

[@Austine1452]

free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, Free Kurdistan, free Kurdistan.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

😂😂😂😂😂

[@Austine1452]

@@papazataklaattiranimam Freedom for Kurdistan. long live Xinjiang province.long live Armenia.

[@venture7025]

The Mogolian was more powerful ruling some parts of Europe, Central Asia, China. Has China targeted the Mogolian?

[@danlhendl]

How you know all that? I no remembu one ting

[@wsmithe2209]

This is really full of it with brown sheets. Don't waste of time here, folks.

[@xrc5540]

You are spreading fake history, no you do not convince me or scholars on the existence of such a situation. Shameful introduction.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Uyghurs ruled Northern China real

[@AllAboutMMA]

Can u prove that it s not real

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Uyghur named Hala bashi ruled chinese ming dynasty.. ge have around 5 thousand remnants in Hunnan province, his remnants are also Uyghurs but more chinised

[@xrc5540]

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Bullcrap.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

@@xrc5540 Hala Bashi is a king of Idikut Uyghur Kocho Kingdom. he ruled Ming dynasty, go check Google. even man who invented Paper in china was Uyghur man, who was later executed for his knowledge. Chinese stole his recipe making paper

[@shashajoe10]

Uyghur khganate never rule china..you are much more a liar giving disinformation...uyghur khaganate was once rule kazakhstan and central asia but they were defeated in central asia Uyghur like many hazara were alll buddhism before they were defeated by muslim

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

shut up. they ruled you

[@alexisdespland4939]

so the kagans cousin tun was a tons of pain for the kagan. lol

[@sahilhossian8212]

Lore of When Uyghurs Ruled China | Uyghur Khaganate Documentary momentum 100

[@ruggedindividual2]

Free the Uyghurs

[@kesoon88]

Twisted history

[@vanveakrin276]

The Tiele tribes in Mongolia faced the Xienbei military power in the 5 th Century

[@terraminsan7392]

Buddhist Uyghurs.

[@lewdtwitch3424]

they never did

[@kongwee1978]

In the end, Xinjiang uyghur is happy with CPC. All muslim countries support this too.

[@KlKl-k4x]

The region in question was occupied by the powerful Dzungar Empire. When the latter was defeated and decimated by the Ching (Manchu) Empire, Han Chinese, Uyghurs, and other minorities were brought in to settle on the conquered lands, henceforth, known as XinJiang (New Territory).

[@chacri08]

I love Dilraba Dilmurat

[@vx8431]

Didn't the last Khagane kill himself? Wasn't Khagane Hu the last legitimate Khan and Öge just a pretender who grabbed the throne after his suicide to then lose the Empire to the Tang and Kyrgiz?

[@teovu5557]

they never ruled "China" they ruled Mongolia(Uyghur Khaganate) and later ruled small kingdoms in Gangsu, China(Ganzhou Uyghur Kingdom) after the Kirghiz kicked them out of Mongolia region.. lol

[@RandomGuy-df1oy]

They ruled large portion of modern day China and extracted annual tribute from Tang time to time, not as much as the Gokturks though

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

why all say kyrgyz kicked them? kyrgyz pay for Uyghurs for 100 years how can they kick Uyghurs? They attacked with Karluks, Chinese against Uyghurs...

[@AllAboutMMA]

Are ughurs descendants of mongols?

[@HDsharp]

Stop spreading lies!!!

[@xp7575]

Which part of this video is a lie? And what is your source for the truth?

[@AllAboutMMA]

Can u prove?

[@HDsharp]

@@xp7575 the Uyghurs are enjoying a renaissance. They're thriving and not being oppressed at all. Go and see for yourself when you visit their state! Massive investments have been poured into their region. So the BS from the west is real!

[@xp7575]

@@HDsharp fake news, nice try tho nazi

[@josephineberlin67]

The Qing dynasty time lands reaches to the turkey habitations

[@teovu5557]

To Turkey? hell no, what history you reading? Or do you mean reaches to Turkic speaking regions like western china and parts of central asia? Turkey/Turkish are not the same thing as Eastern Turks.

[@duyanning]

那个时候维吾尔人还不是穆斯林，也不是农耕民族。

[@fiyangga.yanggiri-hala]

I'm from Manchuria and i love their history and people. Please perceive your own tradition and culture. 🙏

[@peekaboopeekaboo1165]

You're from Heilongjiang, China. The Man-chu rulers incorporated their territory with that of China.

[@Li.Meng.]

满洲是个嘚！

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

I like Manchurians, but I hate you guy lost your language and replace it with mandarin

[@peekaboopeekaboo1165]

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Not true. Mongol Man-chu language is still spoken and taught in schools.

[@samwill7259]

One of the ideas that keeps me up at night is wondering how many Uyghurs there will even be left by the time I die. No one is stopping China, not anytime soon

[@peekaboopeekaboo1165]

False and fake news. Uyghurs population in China continue to grow.

[@parttimethinker7611]

You need to worry about the Muslim population in India as well. Muslim ruled India for over 1200 years. Islam was the predominant religion in India. Now, only about 19% of Indian population are Muslim. Wonder how many Muslim will be left in India when you take your last breath? They’re openly killing Muslim in India now. They’re openly burning the Koran in Sweden now? Türkiye was bribed with financial aids by the U.S. , therefore they (Türkiye ) signed the deal to help the Swede joining NATO. Can Islam be bought?

[@charmingsmile9301]

The population of Uyghurs in China is 12 million people

[@samwill7259]

@@charmingsmile9301 Cool, they are activley being placed in concentration camps. What is your point. Also, NFT avatar, opinion discarded.

[@AlternityGM]

I hope one day that East Turkestan and Tibet regain their independence from China and become free from colonial occupation. I also hope China becomes free from the one-party communist dictatorship.

[@abhinavpatil759]

The CIA thanks you for your service.

[@AccipiterAtricapillus]

my mom is from xinjiang. people there are really tough and love to fight.

[@chanalex8358]

really

[@peekaboopeekaboo1165]

Funny misinformation.

[@shaifunnessa7816]

Georgia vs Seljuk battle of didgori how Georgia defeated Seljuk please make video

[@teslavu9426]

💘 💘 💘

[@beepboop204]

[@RebelKitty338]

First off thank you for your channel and I'm always excited for your content. As for your question not as long as CCP are in power. I could see this eventually happening in a dissolution of modern China, but as it stands right now any ethnic group with particularly strong religious leanings are incompatible with the Maoist hegemony. The only religion ultimately acceptable is worship of the State.

[@kongwee1978]

China for 2000 years is never a religious rule country. We have no problem reading chinese text from Qin Dynasty unlike all other civilization. We can even read Shang and Zhou text which is 3000 years ago. We have confucius study that improving society rather than after life in all religion. We don't wait from heaven to save us in face of thousands year of conflicts and calamates fall upon us.

[@tcxnt5442]

But over 98%of people in China don't have strong religious leanings and the concept of strong religious leaning is foreign to most ethinic groups in China

[@RebelKitty338]

@tcxnt5442 Buddhism? Daoism? Islam alone accounts for 2%, Christians 3, Daoism for 4-10, and Buddhism roughly 20% of the population. According to CIA World Factbook roughly 50% of the entire population are religious and that's with open persecution: www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2021/field/religions/#:~:text=China,51.8%25%20(2020%20est.)

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@peekaboopeekaboo1165]

False and fake news. Neither the PRC or ROC have State religion. PRC citizens are free to believe any religion. Both PRC and ROC are against separatism ...it will not succeed.

[@LimeyRedneck]

🤠💜

[@ShadyAli17]

Yesterdays oppressors are tommorows victims.

[@princevelkan295]

So Uighyurs are same peoples as Mongols & Turks? Their culture & way of life almost similar

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Not similar. Modern day Uyghurs culture is a riched by Karakhanid Karluk culture. But yes, it's Turkic

[@ruggedindividual2]

Real Turks. Ps great thumbnail

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Yugurs are not very Turkic however. They are genetically very Tibetic and Sinitic.

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@Austine1452]

​@@papazataklaattiranimamFree Kurdistan

[@xp7575]

China spent a lot of money programming all the bots here in the comment section to throw hissy fits lol, and the best part is every angry comment promotes this vid in the algorithm so more people see it 😂😂

[@khtan585]

Propaganda galore ❤

[@xp7575]

Which part of this video is a lie? And what is your source for the truth?

[@khtan585]

@@xp7575 one knows a propaganda without needing a source exactly like what the programme has attempted to do.

[@xp7575]

@@khtan585 your feelings aren't a source bro That's why facts don't care about your feelings

[@khtan585]

@@xp7575 propaganda are not facts based and definitely not a reliable source, very much like the programme.

[@alvinchua5211]

What nonsensical disinformation

[@Anwari_khatun]

Plz wake up uyghur muslim😢☪️

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@Anwari_khatun]

@@Austine1452 yas bro free palestin

[@shaifunnessa7816]

Georgia vs Seljuk turk how Georgia defeated Seljuk please make video

[@semanadelherrero]

The Uighurs came from the Arab Empire 1,500 years ago. It was during the Tang Dynasty in China. The earliest ancestors were the Uyghurs. They had nothing to do with the Turks, and they had nothing to do with them genetically. They were closer to the genes of Europa and Central Asia. Mixed race, so what you said is complete nonsense.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

😂😂😂

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

What Arab? Do Arabs have R1a, R1b, J2a M7706? Uyghurs population has Native Central Asian ancestry, not arab. they never marry Arabs

[@semanadelherrero]

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat 😂You have to know that the Arabs at that time included not only Arabs in a large area of ​​​​the Middle East. There are historical records that the Uighurs migrated from the Middle East.

[@semanadelherrero]

@@papazataklaattiranimam It seems that you don’t know much about the history of the Middle East. The Arab Empire in history was very large and included many ethnic groups. Children, if you don’t understand history, study hard.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

@@semanadelherrero All humans migrated from Middle East, but no-one is Arab. Uyghurs genetically related to Central Asian, you can check their gedmatch. The closest population is Hazara, next uzbek, nogai etc.

[@绿菊人]

维吾尔人不是突厥人的后裔，我们的史书有明确的记载，甚至和还和唐朝并肩作战，共同抵抗过突厥人

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

They were not Turk but language was Turkic... and they fought against Turk because of territorial conflicts

[@fredtan1506]

😂😂😂

[@pooi-hoongchan8680]

BS fake video

[@Nxb9ch]

In Sha Allah, Caliphate will be reestablished soon

[@charvaka9526]

Nobody needs another caliphate. A constitutional republic with Human rights is preferable.

[@kongwee1978]

@@charvaka9526 CIA will grant this caliphate.

[@Austine1452]

Free Kurdistan

[@charvaka9526]

@kongwee1978 What might this ever mean? Clue?

[@hanumanbattambang9347]

So Uyghurs are Chinese! Now you all NOT LIKE CHINESE RULES. Who would have thought CHINESE WILL NOT LIKE CHINESE RULES? Ha!…Sad to be Uyghurs; I DO NOT FEEL SORRY FOR YOU!

[@azumishimizu1880]

Shows you the Uyghurs always belonged to China.

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Uyghurs always ruled chinese. they banned them to eat bugs, hundred years Chinese wait. and now they can freely eat Bugs and Scorpions

[@azumishimizu1880]

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat Other way around, Google: Conquest of the Western Turks

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

@@azumishimizu1880 Uyghurs wanted autonomy from Turkic general. Not only Uyghurs fought against Turkic khanate, also Karluks which are Turkic tribe they fought against Turkic khanate.

[@azumishimizu1880]

@@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat China conquered them all

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

china used them to win

[@boldbadaa1800]

Uigars is not turkic it s Sogdian culter frame in Mongolia

[@RandomGuy-df1oy]

wtf nonesense are you spitting? Uyghurs are Turkic for sure, Mongolia was a Turkic land and Sogdians and Mongolic people were just subjects

[@kasyakyoubfgamindikisborat]

Culture is influenced. all modern day Turkic people have Sogdian elements, cause Sogdians were Silk Road man

[@alexisdespland4939]

i hope this never ha[pens but china mite try and block this video