Hi, small error. Between 17:50 to 18:15 , I think the "q" on the outside of the main brackets was not properly distributed over all the terms inside the brackets when multiplying out.
@SPV66 Жыл бұрын
Hi, thank you very much for this awesome lecture tutorial. It was excellent and superbly delivered. Would really appreciate so much if you can suggest a textbook on STR at the same level of difficulty as your video to supplement understanding further. Is there a textbook that also shows clearly step-by-step the non-invariance of Maxwell's Equations as you have shown here? Thank you.
@williamwalker398 ай бұрын
In the nearfield, the speed of light is infinity (see my post at the top of the comments) So inserting c=infinity into the argument presented in this video shows that Maxwells equations are invariant under Galilean transformations in the nearfield, where the speed of light is infinite.
@eigenchris4 жыл бұрын
Awesome work going into the details of how Newton's laws and Galilean Transforms work together.
@RahulSharmaSingularity2 жыл бұрын
You both are extremely hard working and making my love affair with Einsteing much much more ! Kudos and what great channels !
@damian.gamlath6 жыл бұрын
This is bloody amazing. If all university lectures preceeded themselves with an explanation like yours, with an explanation of what we are trying to do and the meaning of things, things would make a hell of a lot more sense.
@prakash-ny7sj2 жыл бұрын
Noted ( i am a professor in govt state college)
@goadelaja Жыл бұрын
All thanks to your videos, I passed a course on Special relativity and Reimann Geometry, in Applied Mathematics. Your simple and systematic approach to teaching the subject was of great help to my understanding. Keep up the good work
@Tom-sp3gy Жыл бұрын
Most books on special relativity, even the very best ones, give only a qualitative description of everything you have just said. Not only do you give a quantitative exegesis, you do so without leaving anything out! A complete explanation that totally satisfies ! You deserve the highest of commendation possible !
@glennnakamura48314 ай бұрын
Amazing derivation of the wave equation for E-M waves! MIT lecturers took board space after board space to do it in only one dimension! I am really impressed!
@Alkis053 жыл бұрын
I have to admit, it is not always easy to understand lectures of professors with Hindi accent, but I would like to say that I appreciate the effort you took on diction and pacing. Made it very comfortable to listen to, which is great for learning. Also your explanations are awesomely clear and easy to follow, without skipping anything important. I could follow the lecture very well, even though it is the first time I'm looking at this topic of the inconsistency of Maxwell equations and Galilean transformations. The algorithm did a great job, because I was looking exactly for this lecture and yours was the first thing to come up and it is well deserved. Thanks for the great content.
@fahrenheit21015 ай бұрын
Yeah this dude's a rare breed among the vast space of Indian educators on KZbin. Most are rushed and unhelpful and merely outline the bare minimum, but this channel actually approaches things with a good amount of passion and background.
@mahadevmaha56216 жыл бұрын
This work is really a great opportunity to physics lovers, to polish/nurture etc.the subject. Sincere thanks to u and If all ends meet to justice to this chain to carry forward then u have option here!
@shishirjha77443 жыл бұрын
Other Physics lecturers must watch this young man to see how Physics lectures should be taken. Great work.
@faisalmehmood52075 жыл бұрын
Lovely explanation...😘. This channel is true for the lover of physics.. 😘
@caltechharvard3 жыл бұрын
This was outstanding. Thank you. Brought back wonderful memories of my early days of physics as a freshman at Caltech in 1969. Wonderful!!!!
@teampunk1356 Жыл бұрын
A caltech legacy alum!? Damn sir!
@gautamsahu77913 жыл бұрын
Well explainaion..your way of explainaion are excellent sir..ji
@minubrahma21812 жыл бұрын
After wandering through several different videos on relativity i finally found the one that clearly explained the need of the ether concept!
@FortheLoveofPhysics6 жыл бұрын
2:13 Galilean Transformations 5:07 Newton's Laws are invariant under Galilean Transformations 7:40 Maxwell''s Equations 14:03 Maxwell's Equations are NOT invariant under GT (Proof) 24:35 Final Thoughts
@kamodkumar67933 жыл бұрын
Hey I want to talk with you sir who we can
@jwano26033 жыл бұрын
The general D'Alembert wave equation is not invariant under GT, why just matter when we talk about Maxwell Equations and not with material waves?
@pranavsachdeva96912 жыл бұрын
You wrote that divergence of electric field is 0
@manik51454 жыл бұрын
an under-subscribed channel
@orikpeyang40432 жыл бұрын
Sir, you really talented teacher among the others teacher . Everyday I am looking for best teacher for b.sec physics on you tube but I never find teacher like you. You are really a great master and as well as a great physicist. Sir you long live. Jai baharat jai India. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤❤❤
@victoriarisko Жыл бұрын
Great lecture explaining a very complex subject in a simple, cleat way. Bravo
@pritykumari53993 жыл бұрын
I have become a fan of your teaching style.Your videos give an opportunity to revisit what I have learnt during my college days. Would love to see you teach mathematical physics as well.
@Godpathforkids-yj5hr Жыл бұрын
Thank you giving a great understanding of how things worked in reality. This enhances my curiosity in Physics. Thank you for your hardwork and you explain really in a extremely good manner.
@mohammedheneen6 жыл бұрын
you have really great way of describing difficult concepts, I benefited a lot from your video .. Can you do one more video to show that magnetic field is a relativistic effect from moving reference frame. So that electricity and magnetism are two sides of the same coin.
@هذاأنا-ذ3ث Жыл бұрын
I suggest checking Shankar's Yale physics 201 lectures. More precisely, his second lecture on EM waves towards the end. The question you asked is discussed there. You can also consult David Griffiths book on EM.
@shubhamdubey39025 жыл бұрын
Sir according to me ur teaching n ur way teaching both r so unique n very best. I would like 2 say that ur the best sir 👍Great!
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Shubham :)
@williamwalker398 ай бұрын
@@FortheLoveofPhysics In the nearfield, the speed of light is infinity (see my post at the top of these comments) So inserting c=infinity into the argument presented in this video shows that Maxwells equations are invariant under Galilean transformations in the nearfield, where the speed of light is infinite.
@Physixfixer17 ай бұрын
You are physics itself sir. i love the clear explanations
@rounaksen13575 жыл бұрын
again a flawless lecture...to the point and very well presented ..for me you are the best teacher
@oyster4545 Жыл бұрын
😢😢no word to thank this person.i would love to give credit of my success in physics to this gentleman
@germatech2 жыл бұрын
Sir, want just to thank you for your excellent presentation on SR...thank you so much...
@VishalKumar-vb8bw2 жыл бұрын
A lot of hard work is put in this video, outstanding performance with a taste of simplicity...... enjoyed learning.👏👏
@quantumfieldtheory5215phymath Жыл бұрын
Sir love you from Bangladesh. It's really helping us a lot. Please continue to make such amazing videos.
@Ohmashaal3 жыл бұрын
Brilliant explanation! Thank you so much.
@nihilisticboi35203 жыл бұрын
Beautifully taught! Everything is perfect.
@gatotpramono43025 жыл бұрын
Clear explanation eventhough it uses vector calculus. After all it's awesome
@ruchi99173 жыл бұрын
You are a great teacher! Thank you for your videos!
@thermodynamics4583 жыл бұрын
Nicely done. That wasn't easy. Tricky thing to explain.
@aremenderootowuwan9319 Жыл бұрын
Well done, I so much enjoyed most of your videos in most of the topics you explained. I would want you to do me a favour by making videos on electromagnetism and problems in respects to this concept. I would be very glad if you do this for me and for other Physics scholars. Thanks!
@hariharansankaran24033 жыл бұрын
Awesome explanation for physics lovers...
@yassinbimgdi61244 жыл бұрын
thank you so much sir that helped me beside you are really good at explaning
@flashfitness72103 жыл бұрын
Fantastic explanation !!
@gopalkrishna85873 жыл бұрын
Sir please bring the general theory of relativity as soon as possible.
@shwetayadav8423 жыл бұрын
M glad I show your channel... Thank u so much for this explanation ❤
@AngelAlita84 Жыл бұрын
Sir, your videos are amazing, can you please also post the DUAL VECTORS? I have exam in ten days, would be very grateful! I cannot understand anyone who is describing it here, I really need your explanations. Thanks in advance!
@MohdSameer-rx9gj5 жыл бұрын
Sir, your lectures are amazing but please create the playlist of your vedios....to help us find the vedios separately and easily
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Will do
@MohdSameer-rx9gj5 жыл бұрын
Ok sir..thanks
@vidhikaushal20953 жыл бұрын
just splendid🔥 ..tysm Sr for this Amazing explanation ❤️
@laural6142 жыл бұрын
This video was very helpful. Thank you very much!
@gunny054 жыл бұрын
Sir you are doing a great job. Your understanding of physics is deep and very clear. Please make a series on general relativity also :) :)
@vivekkumbhar26245 жыл бұрын
Clear and upto the point, just loved it 😍
@williamwalker398 ай бұрын
In the nearfield, the speed of light is infinity (see below) So inserting c=infinity into the argument presented in this video shows that Maxwells equations are invariant under Galilean transformations in the nearfield, where the speed of light is infinite.
@jasminparmar33944 жыл бұрын
Thank u very much sir, l eagerly wait of general relativity field equations derivation from u.
@curiousminds2603 Жыл бұрын
Love you sir, great explain everything make more videos 🤩 I am fist year engineering physics student pls sir launch course for gate physics it great help
@awaisnizamani37544 жыл бұрын
Sir please upload video on general relativity plz
@joelandjohn2649 Жыл бұрын
Sir, can you make a separate lecture on General relativity
@higjiidghjk10133 жыл бұрын
This is what I wanted thank you
@vinaysipani42515 жыл бұрын
Nice one.
@jrrahulsingh3 жыл бұрын
Great explaining power sir....
@duked68885 жыл бұрын
Sir if you don't mind can you explain 17:50... The comparison and how we get B=B'
@SPV66 Жыл бұрын
I think the "q" on the outside of the main brackets was not properly distributed when multiplying out.
@linanahak5882 жыл бұрын
Sir i am inspired by you and i want to be like you🙏🙏
@Godpathforkids-yj5hr Жыл бұрын
Dear Sir, When you will made vedios on GTR with each and every detail. Have you any further plans for it or not?
@mohdnoor99743 жыл бұрын
Thank you my fellow human
@kidslearningbymadhankarthi61142 жыл бұрын
Great explanation...!!
@Noah-jz3gt Жыл бұрын
oh my god… you’re just amazing 😂❤
@sarathadevi70433 жыл бұрын
superb
@Gatewaysclassesupsc4 жыл бұрын
Flawless lecture lots of love dear
@harkiratsingh26655 жыл бұрын
you are doing great work sir hats off
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Thanks :)
@williamwalker398 ай бұрын
Einstein's theory of Special Relativity is based on 2 premises 1) Galilean Relativity: the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference 2) the speed of light is the same in all inertial frames of reference. I claim that the 2nd premise is already included in the 1st premise. This is because the speed of light c is a law of physics, and according to the 1st premise it must be the same in all inertial frames of reference. Another way of stating the 1st postulate, is that there is no experiment that can be done to determine the speed of an inertial moving body. So the 2nd postulate must be included in the 1st postulate, otherwise one could do an experiment based on the speed of light to determine the velocity of a moving inertial observer (like the Michelson Morley experiment). The 1st postulate predicts the Michelson Morley experimental outcome, and it can not measure the effects of the Ether! So if the 2 premises of Special Relativity are just the premise of Galilean Relativity, then according to logic, it is impossible to get different transformations (Lorentz transformations) than one gets for Galilean Relativity (Galilean transformations). Consequently Galilean Relativity must be the correct theory of Relativity. So if the effects of Relativity are observed in experiments, then the effects of Relativity must be an optical illusion. Another outcome of this argument is that Galilean Relativity assumes the speed of light is the same in all inertial frames of reference, which includes the instantaneous nearfield and speed of light farfield. In other words Maxwells equations, which predicts both, is invariant under Galilean transformations.
@Gatewaysclassesupsc4 жыл бұрын
Deserve more subscriber
@hhou29726 жыл бұрын
That's what I was looking for, ty :)
@FortheLoveofPhysics6 жыл бұрын
+Luffy Houssam You're welcome!
@BESTWINCARE3 жыл бұрын
Super sir...
@faisalsheikh78464 жыл бұрын
Sir plzzz make a series of quantum physics plzz sir
@Gatewaysclassesupsc4 жыл бұрын
Wow lots of love
@owaisfarooq939 Жыл бұрын
You write E=E(x,t) along the y axis, but if "E" is a function of x and t then the electric field movies along the x axis or time axis instead of y axis.similarly for the magnetic field . I get confused here.
@williammartin44169 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@doutormanhattan5680 Жыл бұрын
18:00 The "q" is missing in some of the terms in the equation.
@FrancisZerbib Жыл бұрын
Brilliant
@suvrasamanta30072 жыл бұрын
Sir I want to learn about twin paradox in special theory of relativity
@bijayalaxmimallik90684 жыл бұрын
Sir when u give general theory of relativity
@officialsonybhatia5 жыл бұрын
Sir next topic btaiye
@abcdef206910 ай бұрын
do any physicists ever have an urge to ask what transformation makes maxwell's eq invariant. it was the Voigt who tried 1st, and came with voigt transformation which was similar to that of lorentz but backward. experts said voigt was still correct in his own right or something. but i dont have math skills to follow the proof, maybe someone can show me easy way.
@teddybose6373 Жыл бұрын
R these videos apt for Bsc? or its based for engeenering syllabus
@gauravverma66085 жыл бұрын
sir at 10:00 you have written Del.E=0 but its not true its=p/epsilon plz answer
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Its true in vacuum where there are no charges, so p=0
@gauravverma66085 жыл бұрын
Thankyou sir
@ranaabdullahranaabdullah32964 жыл бұрын
sir plz tell me how to understand theory of realtivity from origin
@imaginer043 жыл бұрын
My apologise. Actually I didn’t understand the steps :q(E-VqB)=q(E'-Vq'B') =>qE-VqB=qE'-VqB'+VB'
@oyster4545 Жыл бұрын
absolute FOR kia hota ha?
@for-the-love-of-maths6 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation ☺☺☺☺
@for-the-love-of-maths6 жыл бұрын
One of the most difficult unit in physics when i was doing B.SC was statistical thermodynamics...I hope i will see a playlist on that unit in future by you sir...
@manishbmx88546 жыл бұрын
me bhi einstein ne jo theory diya h usme kam karna chahta hu ,12th ke bad mujhe kya krna chahiye ,astrophysicist bnna sahi hoga na ,astrophysicist bnne k liye 12 th ke bad kaumsa course kru
@FortheLoveofPhysics6 жыл бұрын
To go into astrophysics you need to do graduation in Physics. So a BSc Hons in Physics of a 5 yr Msc from an IIT are good options
@RahulChoudhary-tl7gu11 ай бұрын
Comparison ????? How you have done
@sajeddar68585 жыл бұрын
Sir how law of angular momentum is invariant in galalian transformation
@sonal44646 жыл бұрын
Nice video sir 😊👍
@FortheLoveofPhysics6 жыл бұрын
+Sonal Thank you..
@sbkarajan2 жыл бұрын
We have seen the formula so many times, but never seen it being applied to real world problem with real numbers, albeit hypothetical. Do you have an example problem, that we can apply to see if time dilation and length contraction does do its intended purpose, i.e. keeping the speed of light constant regardless of if you are a moving observer or a stationary one. Using some real numbers, like v = 0.6c, and find out if time dilation and length contraction works. More fun would be, what if v = -0.6c, opposite direction of the light travel?
@doctorpanigrahi9975 Жыл бұрын
The atomic clocks of Global positioning system satellites are faster than that of on earth ,so they have to be calibrated to provide correct information.
@sbkarajan Жыл бұрын
@@doctorpanigrahi9975 Aromic clock in the satellite needs to be reset twice a day due to shift in its location, speed. No need for relativity correction.
@shalinitk3416 Жыл бұрын
Can you please tell me reference books
@hamzaashraff3 ай бұрын
7:33 why you did not multiply d/dt with -v?
@nsmultiman16793 ай бұрын
Same question bro. Did you find any logical explanation to it?
@rishigautam69924 жыл бұрын
Time is not absolute if go more faster to the nearly speed of light ,the time is slower for you
@manipulativer Жыл бұрын
This law is wrong according to the findings of Mike McCulloch?
@ShubhamCE226 жыл бұрын
Sir, i'm not getting hold of the thing that the progagation medium for em waves is vacuum.and what's ether then?It's also a progapgating medium😅..Pls clr my doubt.I'm a bit baffled.
@FortheLoveofPhysics6 жыл бұрын
Traditionally, waves travel through some (material) medium. So, when em waves were discovered, it was assumed that there must be some medium (namely ether) that em waves propagate through. However, after relativity, the idea of ether has been abandoned. It was an idea which sounded nice a century ago, but for complete clarity, ether does not exist. There is NO such thing as ether. Em waves move through vacuum. We discuss ether only to give (historical) context to the development of these ideas.
@ShubhamCE226 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir!!
@officialsonybhatia5 жыл бұрын
I like it
@oyster4545 Жыл бұрын
Gem❤❤😊😊
@freedomofmusic21129 ай бұрын
for the algorithm :)
@trendingvideos59825 жыл бұрын
Sir plz rply... Whether the momentum remains invorent under galilean transformation?
@trendingvideos59825 жыл бұрын
Plz rply tomorrow is my exam😭😭
@FortheLoveofPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Momentum (as a quantity) is not invariant. This is because momentum is mass times velocity. N velocity can be different in different frames of reference.
@trendingvideos59825 жыл бұрын
But sir my frnd gave me something proof of .."show that the linear momentum is invariant under galilean transformation?
@anweshpanda7417 Жыл бұрын
At,17:58 can anyone explain how the comparison results in such results?
@SPV66 Жыл бұрын
I think the "q" on the outside of the main brackets was not properly distributed when multiplying out.
@aishwitgupta7619 Жыл бұрын
Shouldn't q also be multipled to vqB? 18:09
@SPV66 Жыл бұрын
That's right! I think the "q" on the outside of the main brackets was not properly distributed when multiplying out.
@TheCosmicDestroyer....2 жыл бұрын
I can't myself keep thinking where the fuck I was for three years