Hello folks. Hope you enjoy it! Hopefully gonna have a video every weekend in July. Next weekend...LUCA.
@klogjo4 жыл бұрын
I subscribed last week, really enjoy your work, thank you
@bidishadey38154 жыл бұрын
Great
@r2out4 жыл бұрын
Great video! I really loved it. It gave me some powerful emotions of awe delight. I'm subscribing right now, and hoping to relive those same emotions in your next work. The fact that life exist at all, isn't it the most astounding thing ever? The fact that each one of us is alive, that I'm alive, fills me with the most awesome feeling. Thank you for making it possible👍💖
@JakeBiddlecome4 жыл бұрын
I'm glad I found this channel. I watched the playlist earlier today then watched it all over again on the bigger screen. Astronomical/planetary education videos are had to get right and this was perfect. Can't wait to see what's next - thanks for the upload!
@istvansipos99404 жыл бұрын
keep 'em coming also, embrace for sh!tstorm under the upcoming LUCA video. may the holy ponytail of Artemis save our sanity in the comments :- )
@dibsyD3 жыл бұрын
when i was a kid (maybe 7 or so) i remember my mum trying to explain to me that moths are made out of dust and if a place is dusty enough for long enough then the dust will just become moths. (im deliberately avoiding using words like spontaneous as they werent her words). And i remember sorta laughing a bit and saying "ok, but that cant be real though" and she looked at me with bemusement and i realised quickly that she truly believed this... it was quite a moment for me!... still makes me chuckle :)
@rustythecrown93173 жыл бұрын
So that makes moths creations of our waste.
@dibsyD3 жыл бұрын
@@rustythecrown9317 it's pretty metal, that's for sure, lol. that whole emanation thing fascinates me though. that people thought life spontaneously arised from mice appearing next to sacks of wheat, or maggots/flies appearing next to rotting things... it's wild that that seemed like the explanation xD
@andyturner873 жыл бұрын
Sounds like she was taught that to get her to clean up and passed it on to you!
@danchinoloves78043 жыл бұрын
@@dibsyD she was right in a way no dust nothing for them to eat and reproduction. The cleaner the house less dust behind things the less moths have the ability to live
@oldgreybeard25072 жыл бұрын
As a science teacher, apart from the ubiquitous answer from year 7's to the question 'what are the elements?' answered with - Earth Air Fire and Water, the other issue was that kids were told by their grandparents that eating too much sugar gave then worms. Well meaning or illogical I know not but it came up time and time again. That said the ability of first year High School students to come into lessons with the wrong science and leave with the correct science AND the remnants of the wrong science was not uncommon.
@samarkand15854 жыл бұрын
1:25 with the subtitles on, 'life baguettes life' , now that was beautiful
@wwoods664 жыл бұрын
"eels servet newborn from nothing more than a wet *booze* and..."
@elizabethshaw7344 жыл бұрын
Yes I noticed that! I don't know why but my closed captions are on and I can't shut them off on this video. BaHahaha! Dr. Elizabeth MD Ph.D Ph.D
@Salamander12694 жыл бұрын
" life begets life " , it has nothing to do with baguettes.🙈
@samarkand15854 жыл бұрын
@@Salamander1269 you're not particularly bright are you?
@harrietharlow99294 жыл бұрын
@@samarkand1585 I don't think he or she understands puns.
@lise7538 Жыл бұрын
I study biology in France, it's my first year and we have a course called Apparition of Life. You described the first chapter almost word for word ! I couldn't be more thrilled, it's always a relief to have a bit of visual support when reading pages and pages of informations becomes disheartening. I can't wait to see more, thank you
@glennsimonsen8421 Жыл бұрын
Au contraire, cette video est trop con. Je vous suggere de considerer Dr. James Tour.
@ceaserusa4771 Жыл бұрын
Hey sorry to burst your bubble - but if you are looking for answers you have looked the wrong way my friend you say that you study biology - if so the very first law in science regarding biology and life - is that life can only come from life. Do not allow a - KZbin video - made by evolutionists lie to you and make believe that - billions of years ago - some lightning struck some pond scum - and suddenly life came about. That's not how things work - and that's not how science works either. You must get out into the real world and look around you ask yourself - did everything come about by accident and by chance? - - Or was there a designer or Creator - that had created everything that you see and know of
@76rjackson Жыл бұрын
Science and Faith? Might as well suggest studying science and Santa Claus. Lol. You are gonna get the kid kicked out of school. French science is very rigorous. Mythology is a completely different subject and they know better not to mix the 2 up over there.
@melchiorlise2466 Жыл бұрын
@@76rjacksonI don't understand how that relates to my comment...
@76rjackson Жыл бұрын
@@melchiorlise2466 reply was to the true believer pushing James Tour.
@SerpentintheSun2 жыл бұрын
Such beautiful prose and he makes it so much easier to understand complex ideas. I cannot get enough of this channel. I feel like a child exploring the world for the 1st time again.
@michaelpetersen38433 жыл бұрын
This is extremely well produced, researched and narrated. The Channel is a hidden gem of the internet!
@moose64592 жыл бұрын
@@bigboreracing356 humans evolved to be cancer
@epicgamer50542 жыл бұрын
Never gonna give you up, never gonna let you down
@donuts3476 Жыл бұрын
@@epicgamer5054 and desert you~
@hakonberg8003 Жыл бұрын
I disagree, the narration is painfully sloooow... I feel like I am wasting my time
@legendofman12 Жыл бұрын
@@hakonberg80032x speed
@alexhatfield29874 жыл бұрын
This is extraordinarily well researched, presented, scripted and narrated.
@silic88734 жыл бұрын
oh
@oznews13 жыл бұрын
That’s a flattering opinion.
@tarstarkusz3 жыл бұрын
No it's not. It's "well, it could have happened this way and therefore it DID happen this way" It's speculation dressed up in the skinsuit of "science" It is speculation on top of speculation. We have no example of anything but modern cells which have nearly 4 billion years behind them. We don't know what kind of soup was flowing around the earth! It could have been Campbell's cream of mushroom or it could have been Chunky Style. Who knows. So many soups and we don't even have the empty can to test. We don't even have any of the dirty dinner plates (rocks) from the era. We will never know what happened with any certainty. We will and already know some that didn't, but we do not know what did.
@phillipmiddleton93353 жыл бұрын
@@tarstarkusz Wrong! DNA and RNA studies allow scientists to "look" back in time and accurately confirm the beginnings of life on Earth. This is not guesswork or conjecture it is proven scientific fact.
@tarstarkusz3 жыл бұрын
@@phillipmiddleton9335 What does a modern cell tell you about the old cell? Nothing. I assume you are not making the very ridiculous argument that modern cells with BILLIONS of years of evolution are just like 2 or 3 plus billion year old cells? We have no Deoxyribonucleic acid or Ribonucleic acid (I cannot post the abbreviation or it autodeletes) from billions of years ago. We most certainly do not even know for certain that life originated on Earth. This series even explicitly says so. So argue with him about it. We have very little rock of this age and what little we have are from a single small area.
@octoberrust9874 жыл бұрын
I watched many videos on this subject and by far this one is the most easily understood, Good job very well done
@robertsmith36723 жыл бұрын
Does this mean god didn't do the bizzo in seven days .
@danminer53432 жыл бұрын
This video was too simplistic. It ignored all details required for the reactions needed to occur which he falsely imagined could occur. When going into detail experiments have proven that never could a building block for life nor a building block required to build those building blocks could be formed by naturalism without a Creator. Neither can any chemist today in a million dollar modern lab be able to create an amino acid, protein, sugar, RNA or DNA required for life by using molecules that did not come from already existing life.
@eduardogardin879 Жыл бұрын
@@robertsmith3672 It’s only a theory since it can’t be duplicated in a lab. Besides scripture is a poetic explanation for those who had no concept of billions of years or chemistry
@junodonatus4906 Жыл бұрын
@@eduardogardin879 "Only a theory" Look up scientific theory. 🙄
@martinchitembo188310 ай бұрын
@@junodonatus4906it is a theory because it as main unanswerable aspect of this abiogenesis.
@fahad562973 жыл бұрын
"Every element is characterised by it's behaviour, it's affinity for others elements, and the energy needed to make or break connections." If that doesn't deserve a like, I don't know what does.
@bobdobbs9433 жыл бұрын
life accidentally formed. the eye is a electric video camera. it formed by accident.
@zaceishen79742 жыл бұрын
@bob dobbs no it didn't. It was carefully crafted by God our savior the lord Jesus christ. all things were made by him and without him was not any thing made. Ye must be born again How To Go To Heaven According to the holy Word of God in the King James Bible! It is very simple to be saved and takes only a minute to explain. Please let me show you how to get to Heaven from the Bible, God's Word... Man is a Sinner in the Eyes of a Holy God. Isaiah 53:6, “All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.”Romans 3:19, “Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.”John 3:3, “Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.”Romans 3:10, “As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one.”Romans 3:23, “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God.” There is a Price For Our Sin―Burning in Hell Forever. Romans 6:23, “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.”Romans 5:12, “Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.”2nd Thessalonians 1:8, “In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ.”Revelation 20:15, "And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.”Revelation 21:8, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” Jesus paid that price by dying on the cross and shedding His blood; Christ was buried and bodily rose again the third day! Romans 5:8, “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.”John 3:16, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”1st Timothy 1:15, “This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.”1st Peter 1:18-19, “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ...”1st Corinthians 15:1-4, “Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures.” This is the Gospel. By faith in Jesus Christ ALONE we are immediately saved.Galatians 3:26, “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.”John 11:25, “Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.”John 6:28-29, “Then said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent.”Ephesians 2:8-9, “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.”John 14:6, “Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”John 6:40, “And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.”Mark 1:15, “And saying, The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand: repent ye, and believe the gospel.”Acts 26:18, “To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.”Romans 10:13, “For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.”1st Corinthians 3:11, "For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.”Galatians 3:26, “For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.” Salvation is NOT found in a religion or good works, but in a Person... The LORD JESUS CHRIST! Simply BELIEVE the Gospel and You Are Saved!
@zose62892 жыл бұрын
@@bobdobbs943 It is not just life that is accidentally formed, recently there was a storm near my place, it went through a pile of electrical waste and rubbish, and to my surprise when the storm stopped I saw that it formed from these materials a new sony tv
@dynamicworlds12 жыл бұрын
@@zaceishen7974 if our eye was designed by a god, that god is either sadistic or stupid.
@davidthomas91907 ай бұрын
@zaceishen7974 A million candles burning for the help that never came.
@nyx6264 жыл бұрын
I feel like the production on these videos is on par with some BBC/NatGeo/Discovery shows!! Love it!! I'd been looking for a channel that details this stuff and KZbin recommended this video. I can't wait for the rest of the series!!
@oxcart41724 жыл бұрын
I was just about to just that!
@harrietharlow99294 жыл бұрын
@@oxcart4172 The production is wonderful on theses videos. I love this channel and eagerly await each new video.
@oxcart41724 жыл бұрын
@@harrietharlow9929 theyre beautiful! (And I'm about 25 miles from Harlow!)
@ziomudru Жыл бұрын
This is way better than big media productions
@Supeer76e3 жыл бұрын
I just found this channel a few days ago but from all that I've seen on KZbin this is the most comprehensive and involving channel about earth's history. Very well done! I wish you many subscribers and a good fortune!
@kimberlyperrotis89622 жыл бұрын
As an older geologist, I’m out of date, my generation of geology students (early 1980s) learned that 92 elements occurred naturally on earth, not 94. Your videos are excellent, thank you!
@Rubashow2 жыл бұрын
What are the two elements that aren't counted anymore?
@vacuumcleaner52082 жыл бұрын
@@Rubashow this person said they were out of date on the time they learned that there was less naturally occurring elements not more. So the question I would be asking is what are those two elements that have been added recently?
@vacuumcleaner52082 жыл бұрын
Also this is something we can both search up if we’re curious enough, which I’m not currently.
@Rubashow2 жыл бұрын
@@vacuumcleaner5208 yeah I misread her statement. looking it up showed me that 98 elements have been shown to occur naturally l.
@chriswarburtonbrown1566 Жыл бұрын
Not sure what you mean, as the last element that exists in natural form on Earth was discovered in 1941, plutonium. All subsequent elements discovered only exist in lab conditions or nuclear explosions.
@lamegoldfish6736 Жыл бұрын
It is nice to see Carbon gets along with everyone.
@jamesmiller74573 ай бұрын
@@lamegoldfish6736 especially plants 🪴 😍 😆
@meowunicorn76583 ай бұрын
Why did I laugh at this? Way to amused by this comment.
@Musketeer0094 жыл бұрын
Note that many of the cells shown in this interesting video, are Eukaryotes which developed from Prokaryotes. Prokaryotes (the Archaea and Bacteria) have no internal membranes to seperate cell chemistry (such as a Nucleus, Mitochondria and Chloroplasts etc.) but do have the outer cell membrane made of fatty acids. Two or more Prokaryotes got together (accidentally) and ended up making a viable symbiont called the Eukaryotic Cell, from which we all developed. This all took a long long time.
@lilianflower30174 жыл бұрын
Why? Though... so every life wants to evolve What caused this ambition
@mstalcup4 жыл бұрын
@@lilianflower3017 There isn't a desire to evolve involved in the process of evolution at all. More combinations of bionts have failed than have succeeded. In fact, it took so long for incremental changes involving chance encounters of bionts for evolution to progress in complexity that for the first 80% of the history of life on Earth, the only living things were single-celled. Sexual reproduction significantly accelerated the diversification of life because it introduced greater variety in the way genetic material was recombined. This has a lot to do with the diversification events of the late Ediacaran and Cambrian.
@Brakvash4 жыл бұрын
@@lilianflower3017 I think you mistake evolution "ambition" for survival instinct.
@juniorloaf124 жыл бұрын
It was this combination that I think is a major hurdle for complex life in the galaxy
@donaldmacdonald99404 жыл бұрын
Susan W Uehara ...Good question. 😊..🏴....see video 1hr 50mins ..not “evolutionist”....kzbin.info/www/bejne/eavcgpWFhpWXrJI
@TheGreenStone19883 жыл бұрын
This channel is criminally under viewed and subscribed.. Excellent video!
@noscompusarme3 жыл бұрын
Awesome production! As someone working full-time on emergence of life research it's great to see there's loads of interest on the topic!! Huge thanks
@KC-rd3gw3 жыл бұрын
The writing on this channel is leagues ahead of 99% of big TV documentaries. Awesome content!
@jakev85103 жыл бұрын
This is by far one of the best shows I have ever seen, even better than a lot of big budget documentaries. Thank you for this.
@debbiehenri71704 жыл бұрын
Really nicely-paced narration, wonderfully clear - perfect for those of us with hearing problems :D Lovely graphics too. Thanks for this!
@it59424 жыл бұрын
Your videos prove that good intention and passion will drive progress, rather than money and profit.
@Mr.Nichan3 жыл бұрын
It doesn't have to have happened only once. Perhaps it can still happen, just not often enough for any abiogenesis to ever have been observed by humans, and abiogenic life forms are always outcompeted by prexisting ones.
@Musabre3 жыл бұрын
This is a thought that i've had in the past on this myself. The precise combination of events that may have led to the spark of abiogenesis that eventually leads to us, may have happened once or more since, but as you say, been outcompeted by more developed creatures already here. Sobering thought if it's ever proven.
@Mr.Nichan3 жыл бұрын
@@bigboreracing356 Is this a response to my comment? If you read it carefully, you'll see I basically already said this.
@Mr.Nichan3 жыл бұрын
@@bigboreracing356 The thing is, it doesn't prove very much that we've never observed abiogenesis, because the amount of observation we've done covers a much tinier range of space and time than there would be on Early Earth, or has been since on Earth, for it to happen in. Concluding it probably couldn't have happened because we've never observed it would be like looking around your room, not seeing any kangaroo rats, and then concluding that kangaroo rats therefore probably don't exist. There's such a larger space on Earth for them to exist in. There are both very common and extremely rare organisms that exist on Earth, but would not be seen by you looking around your room. This certainly isn't evidence FOR abiogenesis, but my point is that you're first reply was almost completely irrelevent. Your second reply was slightly more relevant because it labelled most of my original comment as "BS", which is at least new information (in the form of giving your opinion and highlighting that my comment just talks about what's possible and not anything there's any evidence for).
@Mr.Nichan3 жыл бұрын
@@bigboreracing356 Why? I can see directions you might be getting this from, but I don't know which you are getting it from.
@Mr.Nichan3 жыл бұрын
@@bigboreracing356 I wouldn't say that, no, but the answer to such a question really depends on how you define a living organism, and I think a lot of the common definitions of "life" have problems. Earth is complicated and energy goes in and out (like with most objects) and you could say it responds to it's environment (again like most objects), though it doesn't reproduce, unless creating totally different life forms counts or if human's etc. going out and terraforming other planets in the future counts. It doesn't pass the parts of definitions based explicitly on Earthly biology, like having cells, unless this "Earth" organism you're proposing is actually the Earth's biosphere treated as a single organism and the rest of the Earth is the "dead" parts, like hair, skin, bone minerals, and extracellular matrix and fluid for humans.
@A-FELIX4 жыл бұрын
I have to admit, I fell asleep watching your first video, but i think that was most likely due to the calming voice of the narrator and the late hour. Luckily, i gave it another shot and now I'm hooked.
@vals42074 жыл бұрын
That sounds like an insult.
@valoriel44643 жыл бұрын
It feels like ASMR to me too. Drink coffee for daytime viewing. So interesting and relaxing at the same time. Thanks, love your channel
@iz65663 жыл бұрын
You should try Journey to the Microcosmos for falling asleep! It’s mesmerizing and at the same time, just like a lullaby 👍🏼
@PresidentFlip3 жыл бұрын
I was trying to sleep with back muscle spasms and this guy’s videos helped me ease up
@PeliSotilas3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, no offense, but his voice is so soothing that it makes me quite sleepy. Kind of like Bob Ross.
@MrBucidart4 жыл бұрын
Leila, Outstanding work as always .... Thank you and the crew for the most informable series on the tube.
@quintonreismann82782 жыл бұрын
A nice introduction. I would have liked to see a bit more work on crystals- how crystallisation spontaneously creates order from disorder, leading to Erwin Schroedinger's idea of the "asymmetric crystal", and finally the self reproducing asymmetric crystal. Life in essence is a peculiar thermodynamic process, that is closely related to crystallisation- molecules that move about randomly, but with a high probability of locking in to particular positions.
@alexanderplatypus36642 жыл бұрын
Yeah. This is a rather weak video to be honest, it kinda just says "DNA is complex, how did it start? Now look over here at RNA and fatty acids, we're done". Not an an amazingly step by step explanation... and I agree with your point of view the *chemistry* is the key to it.
@LordFirthunands2 жыл бұрын
Y siguiendo esto (lo siento, sé leer inglés pero todavía no soy bueno escribiéndolo), hay que decir que hay una hipótesis que dice que la formación de diferentes cristales con diferentes formas pudieron catalizar de manera diferente los diversos procesos químicos que llevaron a la complejización de las moléculas orgánicas. Siendo así una manera más en que la química inorgánica tuvo un papel crucial en el surgimiento de la vida y su posterior evolución.
@allanwrobel6607 Жыл бұрын
But Crystals hold very little information, the spontaneous local reversion of Entropy has to create enough information to create a structure that holds information, a structure that reads that information and structure that acts on that information to reproduce, plus some form of sack to hold the various structures together to stop the disparate components dissipating in the holding medium. I think that's orders of magnitude more information than is needed to create crystals.
@mickeyb492 Жыл бұрын
This channel is incredible. It covers Biology, Geology, Cosmology and many others! You guys are amazing!!
@francus7227 Жыл бұрын
But it doesn't touch the title. Life's origin. At 20:30 .... "Life from nothing." So we're still where Aristotle was. We know a LOT more about life. But, NOT it's origin.
@paulmoffat93062 жыл бұрын
I have watched quite a few presentations delving into how life got started, and one thing that I have noticed, is that (so far) nobody has remarked on the primordial Earth's abundance of radioactive elements. Almost all of the radioactive 'light' elements have decayed, but some like Uranium, have half-lives long enough to persist until today. Billions of years ago, U235 could have been as abundant as 8% or higher. Perhaps this source of energy that was ever present on the planet, provided the initial 'spark' to start things going.
@jerrypolverino6025 Жыл бұрын
I always thought the same thing. Hey, we are not alone. lol
@tamircohen1512 Жыл бұрын
Can you elaborate on how energy from radioactive decay would be any more likely to create life than thermal or kinetic energy?
@musicobsessive123 Жыл бұрын
@@simonebest6013 or the first life form could have been mutagenic, like cancer? not a scientist so i dont know, its like thinking about silicon-based alien life forms- interesting to think about but no one has a way to know yet
@omniXenderman Жыл бұрын
@@tamircohen1512there are fungi that can extract energy from alpha particles, I could see radiation being a viable source of energy
@mariusmelerski513611 ай бұрын
@@simonebest6013 while tardigrades can endure many specific situations like radiation dehydration and so on they're far from indestructable. They have a large variety of predators like snails, nematodes, insects or spiders
@logik100.03 жыл бұрын
Seriously, this is one of the most interesting series I have seen. Thanks to everyone who worked on it.
@TheElwapo666 Жыл бұрын
By the way, this beautiful content has saved my life. To know life and the universe are linked has given me peace. Thank you so much !
@jodiegreen79806 ай бұрын
Beautiful science writing, thank you Leila Battison, David and Peter Kelly, and Khail Kupsky.
@mdivmapperandgamer11384 жыл бұрын
What cosmic coincidence it is that I chose to rewatch the previous videos on this channel today, only to then see another video come out mere hours later
@VeganLinked2 жыл бұрын
Wow this so eloquently pulls everything I've been learning and wondering about together. I love the writing and the narrator's voice is perfect. Great work and thank you for doing this! ❤
@jonnylumberjack62234 жыл бұрын
Bloody hell though peeps! This was GREAT. You made it understandable, RNA and fatty acids, got it! This is fast becoming my favourite channel. So looking forward to the rest of the series. Well done.
@danminer53432 жыл бұрын
The story of evolutionism is a most silly and ridiculous story. It is really amazing and is the opposite of science.
@yumyum723 Жыл бұрын
@@danminer5343 and creationism isn't? At least scientific research has provided a good amount of evidence to support evolution while after generation after generation there is still ZERO evidence for god. Call it silly when you can disprove existing scientific discoveries or refuse and prove your an idiot not to ve listened to, I mean if your so sure then why are you even watching this?
@danminer5343 Жыл бұрын
@@yumyum723 = You are amusing. It is amazing that people such as you will believe anything without using your mind. Pagans have been searching for a reason to believe in the fairy tale of Evolution since Axiamander wrote about it in 460 b.c. but NEVER has anybody yet found any science to support it. However there will always be fools to try to beieve that everything and everybody created themself t\o avoid the reality of our God creating us. Since I have researched this for decades and read hundreds of scientific journals, books, etc. on this subject I am able to show the fraud and/or deception in every statement ever made that fools have used to promote their foolish story. I accept science and reality which is why I cannot believe that crazy story.
@danminer5343 Жыл бұрын
@@yumyum723 -You search for evidence for God like a criminal would search for a policeman. The evidence for God is extremely overwhelming.l Every plant, tree, sea creature, bird and animal designed and built in perfection. God gave us a perfect historical record of our ancient history that has been prove true with hundreds of prophecies with no failure which you completely ignore. Evolutionism, however has made hundreds of predictions with 100% failure. Scientists can show the fraud and/or deception in every statement ever used to promote the story of evolutionism. No book in the world contains an explanation chemically as to how evolution could be possible. The word "Evolution" is used only as an idol of a false 'god' for pagans worship. This is why scientists today are rejection the unscientific nonsense of evolutionism as it is nothing except quackery for pagans who want to sin and to be greedy. You have shown what kind of a person that you truly are and should be ashamed.
@petloh18823 жыл бұрын
I remember when this channel had just 13.1k subs - I came here from the main channel a year ago. What a beautiful channel.
@jacobburr35702 жыл бұрын
This was so beautiful. Really makes me grateful just to be alive, I love you all ❤️
@NintendoTransformer3 жыл бұрын
My ass would've stayed in the primordial soup if I knew there was gonna be days like this.
@RealmsSMPStudiosАй бұрын
Technically you wouldn’t have the sentience or self awareness to have stayed in the chemical soup our family was born in, but I understand you man, TODAY ITS NO LONGER WORTH IT…
@harperwelch51473 жыл бұрын
This series is the best one to emerge in our time. It is very well written and visualized. The narration is exceptionally well done. Flawless editing to keep it brief and understandable. As a former teacher this is excellent learning material to be sharing with students. I recommend it highly. Oh, and it’s also great entertainment. Compelling storytelling
@jimmccallum23083 жыл бұрын
Hi Harper Welch. Actually, "This series is just BS." No one - not even those who claim to be a genius - has ever been able to prove this BS to be true. This is just Atheist propaganda. Jim. :-)
@harperwelch51473 жыл бұрын
@@jimmccallum2308 Wow. Glad I don't know you or other people who think science is a bad word.
@jimmccallum23083 жыл бұрын
@@harperwelch5147 Hiya Harper Welch. You have picked me up wrong. I'm a scientist by nature and by education, and the most fundamental law of science states the following: "Matter and energy CANNOT be created or destroyed but only changed from one form to another." Not one single experiment of the many thousands conducted over centuries of time has ever contradicted this fundamental law of science. The problem for those Atheists masquerading as 'scientists' is that their whole belief system is based on the claim that the universe created itself from a nothing. However, that most fundamental law of science I've quoted proves they are 100% wrong. In other words, the doctrine they are preaching is total BS (if you believe in science, that is). Nothing comes from nothing. If you start with a nothing, then a nothing is what you will end up with. This is simple science. Any belief system that does not believe this scientific law is BS. Do you personally dispute the most fundamental law of science? Do you actually believe the universe created itself from a nothing, and for no reason or purpose? Do you actually believe all life is descended from rocks dissolved in water with a few gases thrown into the mix, and with a few lightning bolts and some UV rays added to provide the energy for inanimate material to suddenly become alive? If you do believe these things, then you are a true Atheist/Scientist. But I would say you must have a phenomenal amount of faith to believe such BS. That fundamental law of science I have quoted proves that the materials, the energy, the space, and the time, that make up our universe must have always existed in some form or other. Any other suggestion inevitably contradicts the fundamental law that matter and energy CANNOT be created or destroyed but only changed from one form to another. 'Atheism' is just another form of 'Creationism', because both of these belief systems are unscientific. Atheists and Creationists are just two faces of the same BS that the universe was created from a nothing. For any belief system to have credibility it must acknowledge the fundamental laws of science that are proven to be true beyond all doubt. In other words: "In the beginning there was a 'something', and that same 'something' has now become the universe we see around ourselves today." Any other belief system has to be BS. I hope you have a better understanding of the position I'm coming from. Jim. :-)
@sevenlineitapinfo29443 жыл бұрын
@@jimmccallum2308 "Atheists and Creationists are just two faces of the same" Question, in your saying 'Atheists and Creationists' should I conclude that you are referring to life coming about only by an Intelligent mind (person) or unintelligent random force (evolution)? if not, then what is that third option that you think cause life to come about as we know it?
@jimmccallum23083 жыл бұрын
@@sevenlineitapinfo2944 Hiya SevenLine iTapinfo. Do you have an understanding of 'The Big Bang Theory?' If so, do you believe 'The Big Bang' came from a 'Nothing?' Or do you believe it must have come from a "Something' that already existed? Jim. :-)
@victorcontreras91382 жыл бұрын
I just had to watch this presentation again. It's so interesting and I needed to remember more facts. I'll probably watch it again soon!
@francissantos74484 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the info. Excellent intro into abiogenesis. Lots of brainstorming and experimentation left yet.
@theobserver91314 жыл бұрын
Already one thumbs down? Some people can't be pleased. I like this!
@klogjo4 жыл бұрын
must be a liberal democrat, they hate everything.
@comrade_commissar37944 жыл бұрын
Gary O Lmao
@tammcd4 жыл бұрын
Those who base their entire lives on belief in a non-existent control-freak are easily frightened by reality.
@deborahromilly62384 жыл бұрын
They are trolls.
@klogjo4 жыл бұрын
@@tammcd and then there are those who reality smacks in the face
@BytebroUK4 жыл бұрын
Nicely done, and an interesting vid. Look forward to the proposed follow-ups :)
@jeanniecatton9168Ай бұрын
I love this channel! Vet tech student here. After studying biology, I knew about fatty acids creating cell walls, but did not understand WHY that would happen eons ago. Thank you, thank you, for teaching this subject in such a clear and elegant way. All your videos are just excellent!
@brookegalyon50222 жыл бұрын
love love love this channel! super well researched and narrated. one of my favorites!
@AddictsoftheImmediate Жыл бұрын
What a wonderful, well informative video! Easy to understand and full of info in just 20 short minutes. Thank you so much!
@flowercity5463 жыл бұрын
As someone actively participating in origin of life studies, I'd like to add to the conversation here. For one, the RNA World is relatively unpopular at this point (at least within my circle of researchers). The production of nucleosides consisting of modern RNA nucleobases, ribose, and phosphate was highly unlikely in Hadean conditions. So instead, there was likely chemical evolution consisting of RNA precursors that were much easier to form and more stable at that time. Also, amino acids (and consequently polypeptides) are much more abundant and easier to be produced abiotically, so it was likely that proteins and genetic material co-evolved. I personally have beef with the RNA World and the damage it's done to the progression of origin of life research as a whole, but that's a whole other tangent. My second interjection is the setting that was chosen for this video. It seemed as though the ocean's surface was the choice, which is not a leading choice for a location. Right now, at least two locations are at the lead, hot springs and alkaline hydrothermal vents (there are more than those, these are just the places I personally know the most about atm so don't come at me). Gradients of conditions would be something likely necessary to drive the increase of chemical complexity that eventually progressed to life. I'm personally on team hot springs coupled with wet-dry cycling (aids in polymerization since water saturated environments result in constant hydrolysis unless there's a kinetic trap preventing it), but it is a touchy subject in the scientific community. I appreciate the overall approach of the video and how it could definitely get people more interested in the subject and provide a guideline on how to view how the origin of life could have progressed. However, I personally feel as though the major points made don't really line up with how the research on the matter has progressed in more recent years. I apologize for the lengthy comment, but you accidentally touched a sore spot of mine. Besides my personal gripes, good video, keep up the good work 👍🏻
@ToroidalX2 жыл бұрын
Now this is constructive criticism! Amazing info. The channel should pin this comment so people can then go and search more about this topic. I can only imagine the complexity of chemicals needed, and in those times scales! I truly admire the work people like you do every day to uncover the mysteries in the origin of life
@mirzamay2 жыл бұрын
I feel like we are missing something big. Trying to figure out origen of life is like a blind person trying to figure out the color purple. We weren't there, we can't see it, and we can't reproduce it even though people swear by things they can't know. All our theories sound like fanciful childhood imagination to me. I'm not sure we'll understand it until we get more evidence of some other part of physics. Like how quantum interacts out something I can't possibly know. So I think in time we'll figure it out, but we'll likely be infinitely further along in understanding than we are right now. All this will push us forward if we don't get stuck on ineffectual theories. I think you are absolutely right. A lot of us are not thinking big enough, we just keep circling around inside our box and the answer isn't in that box. I appreciate your research and passing it along so we can all get a bit more understanding.
@tbone32912 жыл бұрын
Origin of life studies isn't a science at this point. It's just a wild hodgepodge of crackpot whims. The fact is the more the concept is considered, the more confounding obstacles arise. Those obstacles aren't being solved. It's an exercise in hubris.
@jctrowbridge Жыл бұрын
oh man, I just learned you have a channel other than History of the Universe!!!! I'm so stoked to have more of your content now that I've caught up on all of the History of the Universe episodes!
@goldenrepublic68484 жыл бұрын
This channel deserves more subs
@cabbagehead84 жыл бұрын
As usual great narration and artwork!
@HairBallaz4 жыл бұрын
This is beautifully narrated. Leila Battison, you have done such an amazing job
@shahdashraf84952 ай бұрын
The story-telling efforts in this channel and “the entire history of the universe” is highly appreciated ❤
@harrietharlow99293 жыл бұрын
I love your videos. Early Earth and the beginning of life are two of my interests. You've made some very-high quality videos, and the narration is wonderful. Keep up the good work!
@psrivastav4 жыл бұрын
Incredible quality documentry om such a complex subject . Explained in a a simple manner
@RyantheComm3 жыл бұрын
There's new research that posits life starting out in wet and dry cycles. --Instead of the ocean. While water is certainly necessary for today's life, it's also hard to make new life with water diluting the inner machinery. These wet and dry cycles would allow lipids (fatty acids) to wash over organic compounds and capture them when it gets wet, and break apart when it's dry. --Only for them to wash over again when the time comes. This cycle would've probably encouraged some of the first prelude machinery to develop: Molecules that spontaneously replicate after breaking apart (like prions), then developing the coding to split while still inside lipids, intake organic compounds, etc. This would mean that pre life "cells" probably worked together and shared their inner mechanisms, because they had no choice. The best and strongest pre life machinery in the puddle would take over. It was only after the first cells were able to replicate and keep their cell walls intact that I think they started flourishing in the ocean, where there would be lots of room to grow and diversify from itself better. It's a process that probably took billions of years to develop. The key is consistency, and I think having wet and dry cycles is the answer to how pre life got its sea legs.
@Gelatinocyte2Ай бұрын
Prions are not self-replicating molecules, they're a class of proteins that refold other proteins of similar class/sequence into its likeness. They're named after the Prion protein, which are found normally in mammalian nerve cell membranes.
@serenity8910 Жыл бұрын
I'm so glad I discovered this channel. I'm currently watching all of them back to back. Thank you for making incredible science content. The cell is truly the most fascinating thing to ever exist. When I learned about it at school, biology quickly became my favorite subject and eventually followed that path for my career too.
@codeblue42 жыл бұрын
This was really, really well done!
@ExodusM303 жыл бұрын
This series is absolutely incredible thank u for making these
@theflyingfool3 жыл бұрын
I'm loving this series! I want to be able to show it to my young grandchildren when they are a bit older :D
@jimmccallum23083 жыл бұрын
Hi Steve Roberts. Did you know that the most recent design of Robots are the ones designing the next, and the next, Robots? Welcome to the future. Jim. :-).
@theflyingfool3 жыл бұрын
@@jimmccallum2308 but not as "we" know it! I didn't know that , thanks Jim :)
@jimmccallum23083 жыл бұрын
@@theflyingfool Hi Steve Roberts. You should let your grandchildren decide for themselves what they choose to research and believe. This particular propaganda might appeal to you personally, but you shouldn't plan to impose it on your grandchildren. I say it is verbal garbage; as untrue as you can get. Do you want your grandchildren to be aware of my opinion? Or the opinions of others? Or only of your opinions? Jim. :-)
@theflyingfool3 жыл бұрын
@@jimmccallum2308 not sure why you class this as propaganda. I see no reason to move away from a reasonable science based point of view. The truth is we'll never know for sure exactly how life began on this planet, so this is based on our best scientific assessments of what might have happened, mixed with some guesswork. Do you have a better idea?
@jimmccallum23083 жыл бұрын
@@theflyingfool Hi Steve Roberts. This BS is the propaganda of Atheists-claiming-to-be Scientists because they have a BSc in a science subject. The most fundamental law of science says the following: "Matter and energy CANNOT be created or destroyed but only changed from one form to another." Countless thousands of experiments conducted over centuries of time have never once proved this fundamental law to be false. In other words, if you begin with a nothing then science says you will end up with a nothing. Science and common sense say this fundamental law is True. Therefore, it is a certainty that the raw material or raw phenomena of which the universe is made must have always existed. Not always in it's present form, but it must have always existed. Otherwise, that most fundamental of all scientific laws must be wrong. And yet, not one single experiment out of the many thousands that have been conducted has so far suggested this fundamental law is wrong. The odds against the universe creating itself from a nothing are so astronomical as to be incomprehensible. And the odds against life creating itself from non-life are even more astronomical. So astronomical, in fact, as to be absolutely impossible. We are in the age dominated by Atheists. And these Atheists would have us believe that the universe created itself from a nothing; and that all life forms are descended from rocks dissolved in water with a few gasses thrown into the mix, and some lightning bolts and UV rays from the sun to provide some energy, and that this set of circumstances turned non-life into life. This is their claim, but presented as scientific fact. I say it is BS. Atheist propaganda with absolutely no basis in science. The people promoting this BS are flashing their diplomas and their other qualifications in an attempt to persuade us all to believe in their religion. It requires an awesome amount of faith to believe this pseudo-science. It requires a conviction that is the equivalent of religion. In fact, it requires an amount of faith that is beyond normal belief; it requires brainwashing. Those that are brainwashed are normally complicit in the procedure. Jim. :-)
@thelaughinghyenas84654 жыл бұрын
Great stuff! I really look forward to this!
@sosmooth132 жыл бұрын
It’s crazy that people for damn near 2,000 years just thought life materialized from nothing. I’m so happy to be watching these science videos lately. As someone that grew up with a super religious family, these videos give me an existential crisis at times, but it helps me cope with the understanding that maybe not everything I was taught isn’t so and that’s okay.
@ESL-O.G.2 жыл бұрын
It's even crazier that millions of people right now believe that everything is here because God put it there and there ain't no evolution, yeehaw
@AG-vb6vv Жыл бұрын
If anything, these videos should increased your faith. Shows how we basically know nothing about how life was created, let alone evolved. Lends credence to the idea that there is a creator, a guiding force in the universe.
@DarthVaderfr Жыл бұрын
@@AG-vb6vv except although... It doesn't This shouldn't give you clue about neither of both, at very maximum gives you clues of how life can evolve without a creator, and we kinda know a lot about evolution, not everything obviously, but hte fact of been clueless for thousands of years is also been slowed down by religious dogma, so how do you come up with the conclusion that there must be a creator given that we are actually learning and finding clues of how life can emerge spontaneously which the entire point of this video This is utterly made up by you
@pedrovargas2181 Жыл бұрын
From their conditions and perspective, it was the logical thing to think. There was no microscopes nor lore about microbes back then, and most still have a hard time taking the concept seriously without proof.
@pedrovargas2181 Жыл бұрын
@@DarthVaderfr Science: our study on how God made the material world we live in. There, "science vs religion debate" solved. Welcome.
@luvr3814 жыл бұрын
I never cared for the idea of panspermia. That just pushes the origin of life back a step without answering the origin question.
@PeloquinDavid4 жыл бұрын
The possibility (not the relative likelihood) of panspermia is what must make us acknowledge that we may never be able to demonstrate that the earth does (or ever did) have the conditions that gave rise to the existing form of life that permeates the planet. That said, my own hunch (it can be no more than that, though others may be more knowledgeable and have greater justification for their beliefs than I do) is that our form of life did indeed originate on this particular damp rock. Even if this hypothesis were demonstrably true (i.e. it could be elevated to the status of a "fact") that would give us relatively little information about the likelihood of some form of life arising in identical or similar or very different conditions elsewhere. We simply need a larger sample size. That is why we humans are so interested in speculating about and looking for evidence of the existence (and possibly independent emergence) of some form of life elsewhere. It's only by getting a better sense of this likelihood that we can arrive at any sort of informed view of how isolated we may actually be in the cosmos.
@gillianlovell95784 жыл бұрын
@Tim Webb You yourself arose from "some random mechanism". If your mother hadn't slept with your father within the space of a few days, you would not exist. None of us, or indeed any living organism, is predestined by "God" to be here. What IS sad is you posting in the comments section of this excellent channel telling us that we are "lost" if we don't share your opinion - and that's all it is: an opinion. Never presume that we are all atheists either.
@Jebe_Noyon3 жыл бұрын
@@gillianlovell9578 why do you care what he says? unless it bothers you that he might just be right.
@masonmunkey61363 жыл бұрын
@@Jebe_Noyon You could apply the same stupid logic to your own comment. Why do you care what @Gillian Lovell says
@WildsDreams453 жыл бұрын
BAAAM! AND IN AN INSTANT LIFE WAS CREATED! by a meteor sperm.
@kimpraschma83712 жыл бұрын
Absolutely beautiful, informative and with a wonderful narrator.
@harrietharlow99292 жыл бұрын
Watching this, I remember my father, a general practitioner, explaining mitosis and meiosis. It was from him that I learned about humans evolving from a common ancestor with other apes. He would love this.
@stacyshoemaker91772 жыл бұрын
And apes come from…
@sirsanti84082 жыл бұрын
@@stacyshoemaker9177 probably more primitive monkeys
@jasonwiley7982 жыл бұрын
@@stacyshoemaker9177 a common ancestor to man
@stacyshoemaker91772 жыл бұрын
@@jasonwiley798 or not
@pezvonpez Жыл бұрын
@@stacyshoemaker9177 or yes?
@YourAverageHikikomori4 жыл бұрын
Oh shit, never knew you have a second channel. Great stuff. Love your voice dude.
@HistoryoftheEarth4 жыл бұрын
Welcome!
@howtodoit42043 жыл бұрын
Your profile is one hella of a motivation 🥺
@salwaabusaad9819 Жыл бұрын
@@howtodoit4204 عربي?
@robthatsme98314 жыл бұрын
Beautifully directed. You belong in Hollywood. Top score 5/5 👍👍👍👍👍
@JavierBonillaC4 ай бұрын
What an extraordinary documentary. Truly astounding. I love the narrator, the images, and CGI's, but the quality of the content is just amazing.
@justanumber4274 жыл бұрын
Excellent vid! Love your delivery and visuals. Great job!
@harishvyas1074 жыл бұрын
Great video again love watching. Looking forward to next one Keep up the good work . Love it Bye
@harishvyas1074 жыл бұрын
Thank You 🙏🙏
@wolfpackastrobiology3690 Жыл бұрын
A few things: 1. The more we study pre-biotic chemistry the more the importance of wet-dry, hot-cold & acidic alkaline cycles as driving forces is elucidated which makes a terrestrial serpentinizing hydrothermal pool (versus a hydrothermal vent) a far more likely candidate for the origin of life. 2. RNA world implies that the metabolism of the first life was catalyzed by ribozymes and while the first life likely had some catalytic RNA sequences, quite a few metabolic reactions were probably catalysed by inorganic minerals.
@vishtheone7162Ай бұрын
My five year old son wants to understand how and why life began? So here i am looking for answers.
@davidrosen5137Ай бұрын
Phew! I remember that question from mine!
@Humanbeing04-y1eАй бұрын
Give that dad an award!
@cherylmccord82304 жыл бұрын
Your Video's are visually engaging, which allows learning to happen on many levels. This seems like right brain - left brain learning to me. I think teachers will love using these videos to present complex theories in engaging ways. Thank You all for the ART, TIME and RESEARCH you have put in these Videos. You should all be very proud of what you have created. Keep it up our young people need it in there understanding of Earth and LIFE. As do we all!!!
@christosvoskresye4 жыл бұрын
It seems likely that life must have arisen several times, since the harsh conditions of early earth would be prone to kill off new life that had not yet firmly established itself.
@HistoryoftheEarth4 жыл бұрын
We have some possible answers for that question next weekend
@christosvoskresye4 жыл бұрын
@@HistoryoftheEarth Actually, you have just one answer, which is that life probably only originated once, period. Well, maybe. Or maybe some very, very, VERY primitive forms of life originated separately, and symbiotically merged. For example, some scientists have speculated that RNA came first, and others that cell membranes came first; maybe BOTH came "first", and the first cells were a fortunate merger of the two forms of proto-life. I don't suspect there's any way we could ever know unless we discover a "shadow biosphere". www.astrobio.net/retrospections/a-shadow-biosphere/
@frankthelion3 жыл бұрын
@@christosvoskresye Given how microscopic we are talking, even a lake the size of a small village could in theory have both happen at the same time in separate areas and through currents just bang into each other. Even if it took 30 million years of just 1 of each of these to bang into each other. I would consider it to be inevitable over mere chance.
@chirilas5217 Жыл бұрын
What a great documentary. Congratulations.👏👏👏👍👍
@kadnan61114 жыл бұрын
channel needs more subs and views amazing content
@yankeetimeline4 жыл бұрын
Excellent program! Can't wait to see the next episode.
@l1ghtd3m0n32 жыл бұрын
You know a channel is gold when most of the comments aren’t on the content itself but how it’s presented.
@glennsimonsen8421 Жыл бұрын
Ironic! There's nothing new in the content whatsoever. This is all rehashed "info" from decades past. But sure, the presentation is smooth. In short, no one has the slightest clue how life began.
@l1ghtd3m0n3 Жыл бұрын
@@glennsimonsen8421 Isn't that...the point of a science documentary? To make scientific information more palatable to a general audience?
@stringbean0211 ай бұрын
Something many people miss about the origin of life is that the eventual outcome is thermodynamically favorable. The initial reactions were favorable which pushed towards the simple building block molecules. Further reactions and folding driven by the hydrophobic effect and the natural drive to increase entropy pushed for more complex molecules to form. Eventually you form life in it's absolute simplest form. And while it may not seem like it, life inherently increases entropy, this is what drives the universe. So by the very nature of life, thermodynamics pushed for more complex life that further increased entropy. This is what has driven life from it's very origin.
@houstandy10099 ай бұрын
To be blunt, this is a load of rubbish
@jimmyshrimbe93614 жыл бұрын
Awesome stuff! Wonderful channel!
@A-FELIX4 жыл бұрын
I just watched all your videos. You guys rock!
@cernunnos_lives4 жыл бұрын
Earth life needs to colonize beyond it's own home, in order to survive. If Earth ends, all of this becomes nothing. At the very least, we have to spread throughout the rest of the Solar system.
@phaedrussmith19494 жыл бұрын
Conflating that "earth" is the humans on earth is nonsense. The humans will end as just another species that came and went. Earth, on the other hand, will continue on with it's journey.
@RNAxRibose3 жыл бұрын
@@phaedrussmith1949 multicellular life will die off in 800 million years. In order to survuve, we should exapand and achieve immortality by technological or biological means
@markwitt79832 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite videos of all time! Thank you for that.
@Starkada4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic content, thank you!
@harryhill59993 жыл бұрын
This is a great presentation, Thank you very much. It is concise, clear, and follows a logical progression. Which brings me to the one issue I have with it. At Minute 20.30 and thereabouts, "Just this one time, Life arose spontaneously." It was not spontaneous. You have just spent the whole video explaining a logical sequence of events that lead up to the molecules that satisfy the two criteria for the definition of life. It was not a spontaneous event, it was just one more step in a progressive sequence dictated by the nature of the bonding of atoms into molecules , and molecules into more complex conglomerations. I believe it is inevitable that an RNA molecule will eventually produce copies of itself and for the process to become sustainable. The molecules that make up the RNA molecule can ONLY bond with certain other atoms that match their bond. At first this might be different types of atoms, that can loosely or temporarily bond with the RNA molecules and fail, break away and do not progress further. But gradually , over time this process would become more and more focused on the atoms that are collected from the environment that best match the requirements for the survival and perpetuation of the RNA molecule. This, as you intimate, is perhaps the earliest demonstration and application of the "survival of the fittest". If this is correct, then it also makes it unlikely that it happened only once. It would have been happening an infinite number of times over millennia. Don't forget we are talking about atoms here that would have been everywhere on earth, all potentially interacting with each other. All these interactions would be "experiments". Most of these experiments would not result in anything significant, but many of them would be significant bondings and would lead to further steps until eventually the process inevitable became honed down to the successful self replicating molecule creating a self maintaining environment for the continuation or experiments that eventually , several billion years later , result in the Life the planet has today. Once the forging of the elements of hydrogen, carbon and oxygen occurred in the furnaces of evolving suns, the eventual progression to life was just as inevitable as the initial bonding between hydrogen and oxygen to form water.. Life is an inevitability that has to happen, providing other physical conditions are in place to perpetuate the process of progressive "experiments".
@engineeredarmy11523 жыл бұрын
I'm curious about how can a RNA molecule self replicate itself?
@alexanderplatypus36642 жыл бұрын
Agree. The key to understanding life is to demystify it, and rob it of the whole "this one time... something truly special happened". As you get into the physical reasons for atoms and molecules bonding together etc it just makes sense that it occurs in certain conditions, and it isn't "magical" anymore.
@harryhill59992 жыл бұрын
@@engineeredarmy1152 It is not RNA "replicating itself". There is no self to replicate. It is simply a conglomeration of atoms that can only form bonds or break bonds according to the restraining laws of physics. The bonds that work can become stable and progress from there. I believe it is similar to the evolution of species, but at an atomic level. Some pairings will work, some pairings will form but break, some pairings can never happen due to mismatch of charge, some pairings will form stable bonds, and eventually some stable bonds/unstable bond combinations will "evolve" to form a replicating molecule. Just like the driver of species evolution is the environment that favours individuals in an evolving species, so the driver for chemical combination at the atomic level will depend on the surrounding environment of available atoms. Of course it is all just theory, but there is no reason to think that a "self" replicating molecule could not evolve. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/01/090109173205.htm
@MAMW93 Жыл бұрын
Bruh I ate some Mexican food tonight that was grade A but I just shit myself when I trusted a fart. Damn
@ZaheedaNaheedya4 жыл бұрын
Such a great video, very informative! Could easily watch this one again. Thank you.
@Kerplakistandan Жыл бұрын
What an amazing video! I feel very lucky to be able to watch a video of this quality for free. I liked and have been a subscriber for awhile now. Keep up the great work and thank you.
@deanbuss16784 жыл бұрын
This series is moving just as it should. IMO VERY interesting. At least one good thing about the pandemic. It's allowing time for you guys to produce this series.👌👍 Keep it up!
@HistoryoftheEarth4 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much!
@danminer53432 жыл бұрын
Never has anybody ever found a scientific reason to believe in the fiction story of evolution. it is based upon believing the impossible and has zero scientific basis.
@deanbuss16782 жыл бұрын
@@danminer5343 indeed ! Where are the transitionary creatures?
@danminer53432 жыл бұрын
@@deanbuss1678 - Correct, as no transitional could live because a transitional of the interaction of its proteins and microsystem would have to have a different interactome owhich would prevent life.
@deepdrag81313 жыл бұрын
20:22 “Just this one time, life arose spontaneously” Why once and only once? If it happened once, why not more than once?
@glenliesegang89353 жыл бұрын
Most enzymes have at least 100 to 200 amino acids in correct sequence. 20+ a.a for each position. Odds for a 50 a.a chain in correct sequence is 1 in 20^50. A 50 amino acid protein requires 150 triple codons to specify it. Each codon has 64 possible combinations. Even if 2 codons specify the same amino acid, the odds of making that 50 a.a. protein by random coding is 1 in 2^(32×50). Try google scientific calculator. Is it possible? And, 1 in 2^(32x100), or 2^(32x200)? What are the odds for just 1 protein encoded for properly. Now help me understand how natural processes create 20 unique aminoacyl t-rna synthetases, create ribosomes, ATP synthetase, and exclude all but the left handed amino acids, exclude Zn,Hg,As,Mn,Cu, found at hydrothermal vents, all which denatured proteins and poison life.
@bobmiedema27263 жыл бұрын
@@glenliesegang8935 Well said. It makes happening spontaneously outrageously improbable, even in an ocean full of the right raw materials. I think the "how" in the subject line of the video was answered with a lot of wishful, hopeful thinking on a scale that science should blush at the suggestion.
@williamchamberlain22633 жыл бұрын
@@bobmiedema2726 not into maths are you? Hundreds of millions of years is a lot of chance reactions.
@scrung Жыл бұрын
@@williamchamberlain2263 i’m interested in seeing the time scale vs the probability of this event happening relative to each other. maybe given billions of years, the probability of life arising might be so low that twice might still be a reach. but that’s if and only if the odds imply that this is the truth. since you chose to respond with that kind of snarky attitude i figure you must obviously know the answer. can you please tell me
@williamchamberlain2263 Жыл бұрын
@@scrung I can tell that the probability of you understanding Darwin's "stump and wedges" analogy is 0.
@mitseraffej58124 жыл бұрын
I now know where I might have come from but still have no idea where my life is going. All I know is that it is going.
@ezr1684 жыл бұрын
A strange and interesting cycle that is all too real, enjoy
@Totallyrealhooman3 жыл бұрын
There's another, more scientifically rigorous view and it's worth considering. kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3fXn6qonraFn5o
@mitseraffej58123 жыл бұрын
@Janette Diaz Human inability to understand and or reproduce how life began is not proof of intelligent design, neither are examples of human technology. Human intelligence is after all the result of nature, and although we may think human intelligence is superior to that of other animals, it is not a solely human trait. In many ways human intelligence is not as developed as other species. As an example my beloved dog is highly attuned to every nuance of my emotional and physical health, in many ways more so than my beloved wife.
@tracycartwright978 Жыл бұрын
This really fascinates me, I love knowing how life started, I don't take our existence for granted, it's a miracle we are here on our beautiful Earth.
@vaiuuii4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic high quality content
@oobrocks3 жыл бұрын
My grandmother thought frogs evolved from mud!
@jimp51333 жыл бұрын
Just that one time it happened
@philwomack68414 жыл бұрын
Fabulous explanation :)
@juliebear15056 ай бұрын
Love this entire playlist. As I watched I had an idea. The narrator speculates that molecules were far and few between but eventually found each other. Very evocative when the oceans were as huge as today. What if the opposite was true. What if the process in certain areas created an exuberant abundance of molecules so the merging of one another was inevitable. Just a thought.
@monad51404 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting if we eventually were able to synthesize autogenesis in a controlled environment. It would then allow us to create lifeforms from the ground up. Maybe even ones fit to travel the stars.
@richardwebb95324 жыл бұрын
Life cannot emerge from non-biological elements. You can add whatever chemicals you like, no life will appear....
@monad51404 жыл бұрын
@@richardwebb9532 Not yet anyway. The most exciting development would be synthesized life. Or some approximation. The true goal is continued spread of genetic material. On a cosmic scale this could be useful as standard reproduction is insufficient for interstellar species. A modified version of life may be necessary.
@monad51403 жыл бұрын
@cat magic I mean the neanderthals probably thought we were monsters (they were correct in their case as we interbred and then killed them all), but the next chapter was quite exciting for life. This new life form will almost certainly kill us, but in the big picture that's almost irrelevant.
@sevenlineitapinfo29443 жыл бұрын
@@bigboreracing356 Good point
@richardwebb95322 жыл бұрын
@@whatabouttheearth ....funny how you didn't explain how inorganic hydrogen becomes organic and "alive"... Nice strawman tho', was it on special?
@Bloodknok4 жыл бұрын
This is a super series!
@VoyagerLife8264 жыл бұрын
Do you think that life could have risen more than just that one time? Could have happened multiple times over the insane amount of time
@chinyoka2387 Жыл бұрын
"No mice sprouted spontaneously into being in the late Hadean Earth" Well obviously, there were no dirty shirts around
@latheofheaven10174 жыл бұрын
Enjoying this series very much so far. Great job everyone. Can I make a production criticism though? The script, visuals and music is great, but the recording quality of the narration lets it all down. Echoey, and very sibilant. A better microphone, better microphone placement along with an isolation shield, and a de-esser would bring everything up to par.
@HistoryoftheEarth4 жыл бұрын
Thanks - great suggestions and very helpful.
@loki66264 жыл бұрын
Sounded ok to me. Watched it on my tv with a soundbar.
@malinzkia98454 жыл бұрын
Science gives my soul more peace than any religion ever could
@evanhughes15104 жыл бұрын
In what way?
@Ffollies4 жыл бұрын
Same here. In a lot of ways I think science is the opposite of religion.
@FreedomAnderson4 жыл бұрын
Ironically, souls are a religious concept.
@DarthVaderfr Жыл бұрын
@@FreedomAnderson fake, complete the opposite, claiming the existence of a force working out of those known in physics is in the frame of pseudo science(aka bullshit) The soul is a religious concept, it can't be measured in any way
@cbrx_ Жыл бұрын
@@FreedomAndersoneven more ironically, religion is a human construct which is probably psychological
@cd18573 жыл бұрын
Stating a problem, and then that the problem solved itself, even as elegantly as this video does, does not constitute an answer. It would still be more accurate, however unsatisfying, to simply state that we still have no idea how non-living matter gave rise to life.
@briant21403 жыл бұрын
It was a rare accident. Given enough time life is a question of probability. Life was 'cooked' in the premordial ponds/oceans, by lightning, the sun, and/or thermal vents in the ocean. Simple molecules became more complex by fusing together through heat.
@cd18573 жыл бұрын
@@briant2140 Probability only makes the origin of life problem worse. The combinations necessary for life to have arisen by "accident" (i.e. by non-directed means) make clear even trillions of years over trillions of universes wouldn't be sufficient. Biologists are slowly waking to the mathematical reality there hasn't been even a fraction of the time necessary in our universe for life to have emerged from non-living matter by any process of nature alone.
@briant21403 жыл бұрын
@@cd1857 In my opinion the Universe has no beginning and no end. Time and numbers (artificial inventions of man, due to the temporal matters of the flesh), are therefore meaningless. In other words over an infinity of "time" probability (of life) most certainly exists.
@32BitJunkie3 жыл бұрын
Link to these "biologists"? Sound more like young earth bible thumpers to me.
@cd18573 жыл бұрын
@@32BitJunkie Try looking up the 1967 Wistar Conference. Mathematical impossibility has nothing to do with "Young Earth Bible Thumpers"...shame your antagonism to unrelated matters colors your ability to be receptive to calculable facts
@DavidGS663 жыл бұрын
1st cellular cytoplasm was the ocean. All chemicals proto RNA needed were acquired by "hunting & gathering". There was an incentive to build a cell wall & "domesticate" the wandering chemicals needed.
@isaacchavez64654 жыл бұрын
For those interested the book "The Vital Question by Nick Lane" is a great introduction to abiogenisis. He also puts forth a compelling theory about life's origins in the book.
@thedarknessthatcomesbefore42794 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I will look that book up.
@paubakero4 жыл бұрын
@Tim Webb It's very different to say that something has no purpose than saying it can't exist. Evolution can explain the complexity, once you have a simple self-replicating unit with a somewhat stable metabolism. Evolution is already well-known, and science is marching on the path to discover what this first self-replicating unit could have been.
@paubakero4 жыл бұрын
@ReligionlessFAITH Evolution is a general framework for explaining complexity in life, and does it amazingly well. About awareness and other phenomena related to minds, we are making slow progress but the way ahead still looks quite long. Life can definitely arise from non-life, it necessarily has been done at least once or else we wouldn't be here. By the way, you should learn more about the axiomatic method, math has actually a solid foundation and mathematical proofs are a thing.
@stevencooper44224 жыл бұрын
@ I mean he does have a point, one cannot assume the biosphere suddenly has a purpose when physics dictates it does not!
@DarthVaderfr Жыл бұрын
@ReligionlessFAITH definitely not, evolution is quite a great theory and actually given his principles it can predict the existence of chemical stable compound that evolve and become more complex, while the less stable compound simply fade away, which is the entire point of an entire field of study, which is chemical evolution, while awereness, even if we don't know what i consciousness, it still works in the frame of evolution because obviously a conscious creature is far more able to survive than one more clueless about his environment so it does make sense The second part of your point went very meta very quickly, mathematical truth are different than scientific truth, cause you define what is a thing, like 3 and that's the axiom, it's not something that you have to prove that all 3 are 3, that will be nonsense