Just a note as someone from the city, almost everyone here (both unionist and nationalist) calls it Derry. Its just much faster to say. The people who call its Londonderry arent generally from the place
@darnellbiggumsthe9th6583 жыл бұрын
either way for speed and ease or not it’s derry, always had been and always will be
@mikeoxsmal80223 жыл бұрын
DOIRE
@Oscarhobbit3 жыл бұрын
The last two commenters only highlights the level of ignorance and sectarianism that exists in Northern Ireland today.
@mikeoxsmal80223 жыл бұрын
@@Oscarhobbit my comment is neither
@darnellbiggumsthe9th6583 жыл бұрын
@@Oscarhobbit not sectarian when both comments, mine and the other persons are historical facts.
@danielmcallister48163 жыл бұрын
Should've been called : Operation Armaghgeddon
@Monkeypole3 жыл бұрын
Hahahaa lovely 👌
@caoimhinmccann44493 жыл бұрын
Nice
@leonieromanes72653 жыл бұрын
😁😁😁
@CC-wf2qb3 жыл бұрын
Armaghzing
@henksonnemans3 жыл бұрын
Ljouwert- Derry, that is nice !
@antseanbheanbocht49933 жыл бұрын
Little known fact: Taoiseach and Tanist are from the Ancient Irish Clan election system called Tanistry. Clan leaders were elected by their kinsmen (derbfine). The Irish prime minister and deputy prime minister now use the titles.
@hcollins40663 жыл бұрын
*Tánaiste not tanist for the title but yeah
@Joker-yw9hl3 жыл бұрын
That's pretty cool
@aenorist24313 жыл бұрын
Someone played their CK3
@njb11263 жыл бұрын
Why do they still use this system? Is their crown authority too low? Primogeniture is the best.
@antseanbheanbocht49933 жыл бұрын
@@njb1126 Crown authority? Whats that?
@katywalker83223 жыл бұрын
The Irish military was around the same size as the RUC alone While Derry might be regarded as close to the border, it could be cut off from the rest of Ireland by just cutting off the whole of Donegal. This would have left any Irish regular army force in Derry completely isolated and unsupplied. I would expect that the professional officers of the Irish regular army would have been completely aware that they had no chance militarily, and would have explicitly told this to any politicians
@robert61063 жыл бұрын
There was only the one bridge in BallyShannon and another in Beleek. Then they would have been forced into Enniskillen and would have had to travel through miles of Unionist leaning farmland. It would have got mess and ended in a total disaster not just militarily but also politically as ten's of thousands of British subjects came streaming out of the invaded areas. As bad as things were in Belfast it was never as bad as some would have you believe, the areas of most violence where were the two different communities clashed, many areas of Northern Ireland didn't have any trouble and it was not until in many case the Protestants driven from their home in places like Belfast turn on their new Catholic neighbours were they settles in the suburbs. Before 1969 Belfast was in a faze of depopulation as populations move out to the new towns commissioned by Stormont to rehouse Belfast's population as part of the UK wide slum clears of the 1950s and 1960s. Thankfully the Irish government came to it's sense and didn't follow out this disaster, unfortunately the IRA carried through with it ending in disaster for many.
@raftonpounder66963 жыл бұрын
@@robert6106 and failure.
@robert61063 жыл бұрын
@@raftonpounder6696 Very much so.
@CC-wf2qb3 жыл бұрын
Or they could have just used the river as the cut off point, but sadly it had military use for docking etc.
@stevenconfident58833 жыл бұрын
The main aim was to get international attention on Northern Ireland. The Republic wanted to bring the issue to the UN this did make sense because internationally and there was a lot of sympathy for the Nationalists. I remember I had a lecture from the Netherlands and I asked him about how the trouble was perceived there given the William up at Orange link and he said The unionists particularly Ian Paisley reminder the older generation of the Nazis. This is why Britain try to keep the Northern Ireland a internal issue because it knew that there was sympathy for the Nationalists in the International community.
@ConorMakes3 жыл бұрын
"Troubles" always hated that term, you have trouble putting on your socks....fixing your car....doing the house work. The killing of men women and children from either side and calling it a terrible trouble was ridicules. I hated it, growing up and being surrounded by it
@-jank-willson3 жыл бұрын
only catholic women and children were killed (by the UVF/UDR),the IRA never attacked protestant innocent civilians...
@ConorMakes3 жыл бұрын
@@-jank-willson you make sound like that was ok
@olliephelan3 жыл бұрын
@@-jank-willson Well, the I R A actually did attack innocent protestant civilians. Deliberately. Its well documented and explained by I R A statements , that it was to put an end to sectarian attacks by the UVF in Armagh, Tyrone and Fermanagh. The UDA were not particularly good at targeting anyone so they went for soft easy targets. The S Armage I R A decided to show that if the UVF did not stop, then theyd would be far far more efficient and deadly in that type of attack. So they had to sacrifice some innocents in order to demonstrate that The statement after the "Darkly Massacre" (3 dead,several wounded) said (roughly) "If we wanted to pursue a sectarian war we could have gone into the church and killed all 30, so stop sectarian attacks now " -------------------------------------------------------- And after Darky and Kingsmill , all sectarian attacks by the UVF /PAF stopped in those 3 counties. Thats when the British increased sharing information with the UDA and began giving them I R A and SF addresses and helped plan proper attacks for them. ----------------------------------- Extra;................ *Even the movie 71 goes into that* In that film theres an editing mistake, which was fixed for netflix. I saw the original when the title was "Battle line 71" There was a different storyline for the bomb which is patched up very very badly for Netflix and CD. The bomb was supposed to go off in the Loyalist pub , to create a Loyalist reaction and speed up support for the more radical Provisionals. Thats why the lost soldier was left there. (because he saw the collusion) Even after trying to fix the editing mistake, its not explained why the MRF drove off without the soldier. Same reason why he tried to strangle him later.
@james065983 жыл бұрын
@@-jank-willson Yes but they had no problem with collateral damage did they? The IRA would mow down 10 civilians if it meant killing one soldier. The IRA would blow up a bus full of school children if it meant killing the part time police man driver (they actually did do this by the way) They’d blow up and entire building full of people if it meant they had a shot at a high profile person like The Queen. So don’t come in here portraying as if the IRA were better than the Loyalist death squads. They weren’t. They were equally as bad as each other and the sooner you accept that and move on, THE SOONER WE MAY LIVE IN HARMONY!
@-jank-willson3 жыл бұрын
@@olliephelan no they didn't, not intentionally...
@damianbylightning68233 жыл бұрын
It isn't surprising that Ireland had a war game of this nature. People are reading far too much into this. The pre-WWII, US War Plan Red, which dealt with possible war with the British Empire, is far more interesting and more realistic in terms of possible conflict.
@alcabone11263 жыл бұрын
The u.s was unlikely to invade Canada because of the Great Depression. The U.S only recovered due to the war.
@damianbylightning68233 жыл бұрын
@@alcabone1126 What relevance is this?
@ParagonRex3 жыл бұрын
Have you looked up the Canadian plan or invading the US? I think it was called Case Brown and was pretty damned good
@jimmyryan58803 жыл бұрын
Im sorry boss, I know this is the planing office but I wont be making any plans. You see in 50 years there is going to be this computer video thing and they arnt going to understand what we do in the planning office and theyre going to make fun of my plan. So im just going to sit here and drink my barrys tea. Is that ok with you general?
@ParagonRex3 жыл бұрын
@@jimmyryan5880 Lolz
@AverytheCubanAmerican3 жыл бұрын
What you need to invade Northern Ireland: - brand new shiny helmet - pair of kinky boots - lovely new flak jacket - lovely khaki suit - go on night patrol - hold each other's hands
@The_Republic_of_Ireland3 жыл бұрын
Optional but NOT recommended: the British Army to take your land
@saintfan07UK3 жыл бұрын
I'm English (sorry) even I get this haha
@The_Republic_of_Ireland3 жыл бұрын
@@saintfan07UK listen to the Irish song Kinky Boots and you will mate
@saintfan07UK3 жыл бұрын
@@The_Republic_of_Ireland I have, that's why I get it. To be fair I've listened to quite a few irish rebel songs and do on a regular basis
@CommissarMoody13 жыл бұрын
Got my squad mates to sing it a few times while marching and training. It's a catchy song. 😅
@UKRichardHK2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. Very interesting, I'm English and I lived in NI in 1990. I noticed the North was then in much better shape than the South with road conditions etc. Then 3 years ago I went back for a road trip and drove around both parts of Ireland. I noticed a big jump forward in living conditions in the south and didn't feel much different from the north. This must have made the border much less significant and surely gives people less reason to to want to fight each other. But Brexit!!! - I can't think of a much worse way to mess all this up than to have one part of Ireland in the EU and the other out. Let's hope things never go back to the way they were.
@OllieGrigg2 жыл бұрын
Ireland just needs to reunite, makes more sense now than ever
@ardri312 жыл бұрын
@Aviation@engineering8 yes it does
@ardri312 жыл бұрын
@Aviation@engineering8 wrong on both counts. The souths average wage now is about €850 p/w. And the census results in June will reveal why your wrong about the majority wanting to remain, with the proper plans in place it would be stupid not to unite and prosper.
@JaydenHalo2 жыл бұрын
@@ardri31 I don't get why England won't give it back its years upon years of persecution and bloodshed and we dont all of our country back?
@Olilego2 жыл бұрын
Do not call us the south. We go further north than Northern Ireland.
@frasermckevitt2417 Жыл бұрын
The Irish government heavily disliked the IRA as the IRA refused to recognise the Irish government and was effectively trying to take over Northern Ireland then move south to take the Republic
@gabhagael69833 жыл бұрын
Look up "The Arms Crisis" the Irish government began training and importing arms for a a paramilitary that was friendly to the Republic (The IRA are not friendly to the Republic, they see/saw it as an illegitimate state), when it became apparent to the Irish government that people in the North would support the IRA over the Irish Government, they denied the plan existed and threw several people under the bus.
@MJ-cv5ye3 жыл бұрын
No it didnt. Thats all been long since revealed. The Official IRA used their sympathisers in the Irish media establishment to invent a scandal to blacken the eye of the provos & Fianna Fail controlled Irish government at the time. Both of which were their rivals & enemies at the time. A half assed highly isolated attempt by a handful of people to run some guns doesnt constitute Ireland supporting or supplying the provos. Its also quite disengenious to try making out Ireland supported the provos, cynically or otherwise, the Provos were at war with Ireland too. They didnt view the Dail as a legitimate gov. due to the insane convoluted nonsense ideology they go by called "Republican legiticism". Conversely multiply british enquiries have shown routine, widespread, sustained & heavy, training, funding, grooming, protection from prosecutions & intelligence sharing between the British state & British loyalist terrorists. It was so pervasive that it would not be unfair to describe the loyalism terrorism as almost entirely owned & operated as a disposable proxy of the British state. Your arguement is like worrying about worrying that victim 35 of a serial killer, scratched their attacker. Its a daft thing to focus on.
@peterfox58973 жыл бұрын
@@MJ-cv5ye yes, people don't understand it was a few rebel TDs who lost their positions and police got involved. It was not, nor was it ever government policy to arm the IRA or train them. The IRA was seen as a threat to the Irish state.
@MJ-cv5ye3 жыл бұрын
@@peterfox5897 yes. Exactly. The Provisional IRA(As its important to distinguish them from earlier iterations as well as the historical IRA of the civil war & independence era) were sworn enemies of the democratically elected government of Ireland. They always managed to have a couple of quislings infiltrate FF down the years, but having secret sympathisers or double agents isnt the same as active help. The british govs. aiding & directing the UVF & UDA as proxies, the UDA & UVF didnt have a relative hand full of agents installed in the british gov. dedicated to its overthrow. Also whats forgotten in that is the mere whiff of a connection to it was enough to topple haughey as the Provos were contrary to modern misremembering in Ireland & British misunderstandings deeply hated & feared by the majority of the people in Ireland. After all, while the northerners had to put up with being shot as "informers" any time a provo gang boss took a dislike to them or people randomly got blown up by them or they shot a child or robbed a beer truck, in the republic people had to deal with Loyalist bombs as "retaliation" for Provo actions as well as routine kidnappings of anyone with money or having bank tellers or shop keepers families held hostage while they forced people to rob their own businesses or banks or ripped ATMs out of walls or gunned down police while robbing cash trucks etc etc. The Provos conducted a reign of terror on the normal population in the republic. They were fascist authoritarians who took personal loyalty oaths to their unelected, secret military junta in Belfast which included promises to put the juntas whims before even the lives of spouses & children & brought great suffering & fear to the republic. Its utterly a rewrite of history for anyone to claim that the Irish gov. "helped them". The Irish gov. caught, prossicuted & issued life sentences to more Provos than the british state did & even once searched 30,000 homes looking for weapons & safehouses in 1 man hunt.
@ulsterman20213 жыл бұрын
@@MJ-cv5ye Nice try, but the Irish legal system provided sanctuary for the IRA. Try that nonsense on the USA and they would invade you.
@MJ-cv5ye3 жыл бұрын
@@ulsterman2021 really? How so? Specifically how did the Irish legal system offer sanctuary to "the IRA"? You're quite obviously clueless as you cant even get the name right. "The IRA" ceased to exist after its defeat in the civil war & demobilization of the Ulster Brigade after it retreated into the Free State in the face of the pogrom & mass round ups in N.Ireland during 1922-23. The group being referred to here is the Provisional IRA, an entirely different organisation, active from 1970 onward. That organisation PIRA got no "sanctuary" from the Irish legal system you born fool. I literally grew up in a house we had to move from because our neighbour was an Irish judge who got appointed to the Special Criminal Court. The Garda(Irish cops) had to fortify the judges property with 6 foot walls, barbed wire & 2 continually manned guard towers. The Irish state had to do that because unlike the British legal system, the Irish legal system far from offering sanctuary, locked up Provos constantly. Its why the Shinners to this day despise the Irish Special Criminal Court. The British legal system preferred to simply just round up any old paddy when Limies got a bit cranky at the conflict following them home or torturing confessions out of all & sundry in N.Ireland & putting said torture confessions through the diplock court system for pre determined fascistic results. The neighbour who was a judge like all Irish judges on that court tasked with Provo prosecutions were much too effective at locking them up for the Provos liking & were fond of trying to petrol bombs or assasinate said judges. When was the last British judge you ever heard having to live like that or getting firebombed or assasinated? Oh yah, thats right, because the Provos didnt worry too much about them coz they didnt lock too many up. The British legal system was far more effective at recruiting Provos than it ever was at putting them away. Fond of sending innocent people in to become radicalized by unjust convictions. Jog on Gary, I'm sure theres an EDL or BNP rally for yah to go join. Uninformed & guided by your preconcieved racist stereotypes. Get a grip
@freakyscottdude3 жыл бұрын
I remember learning about this in school, and my teacher just called it the 'stupidest idea ever conceived', so from then on I never remembered its name, I just knew it as the 'stupid invasion'
@stephendowney40763 жыл бұрын
It would have been hilariously easy for Óglaigh na hÉireann to take the border area given that Newry and Derry very much feel like they are on the wrong side of the border. But they would have been decimated by the brits very soon after.
@louisemckn3 жыл бұрын
If you’re interested read the forgotten revolution it gives a lot of insight into what was going on behind the scenes.
@zzDevotion3 жыл бұрын
@@stephendowney4076 how would've it been hilariously easy? You think the people that made this country would ever accept a terrorist occupation of its border. Without the security forces operations here, entire towns and villages would have been razed to the ground, ethic cleansing of which the UK and ROI has never seen. "hilariously easy"
@stephendowney40763 жыл бұрын
@@zzDevotion the point I was making was that due to the demographics of Derry and Newry they are predominately Nationalist and would be more accepting and supportive of the Irish Army than they would have been of even the RUC, the USC and the British Army. On that basis the local population would have been very supportive of the 'invasion'.
@ardakolimsky71073 жыл бұрын
@@zzDevotion *ethic cleansing of which the UK and ROI has never seen* Clearly you are ignorant of your history
@gloin102 жыл бұрын
The reason this staff study was called 'Operation Armageddon' was to make it absolutely clear to even the dimmest Irish politician that it could only result in the destruction of the Irish state. The officer corps of the Irish Defence Forces basically told the government of the day that, were orders to invade Northern Ireland issued, the vast majority of the officer corps would resign, leaving a skeleton command structure to maintain the internal security of the state. We had an army of about 8,500 men, of which approximately 70% were medically unfit for duty. We had so little logistic capability that the study baldly stated that it would be necessary to lease buses from CIE, the state transport company. We had NO navy, and NO airforce, while the Royal Ulster Constabulary(RUC) had more actual armoured vehicles than the Irish army possessed. The UK had, and has, NUCLEAR WEAPONS. Ireland does NOT. The UK had, and has, a PERMANENT SEAT on the UN Security Council. Ireland does NOT. The UK had, and has, a blue water navy. Ireland does NOT. The UK had, and has, a large airforce. Ireland does NOT. The UK was, and is, a member of NATO. So Article 5, and Ireland was going to declare war on NATO like it was going to fly to the moon by metabolising 20Kg of baked beans.... Quite simply, there was, and is, NO WAY that Ireland would ever invade Northern Ireland(NI). National suicide is not something that the Irish are into....
@Reynolds1282 жыл бұрын
Time is on side
@ganrimmonim2 жыл бұрын
It would probably be a very bad idea, the UK's of nuclear weapons being irrelevant not withstanding, largely because most people on the mainland don't care all that much about Northern Ireland it being invaded is probably a way to make them care.
@user-ze8yy8jg1f Жыл бұрын
That’s why it didn’t happen and we succeeded with gorilla war
@outlawquelshingdixienothin889311 ай бұрын
That last line is proven false today. You are being replaced
@gloin1010 ай бұрын
@@outlawquelshingdixienothin8893 "You are being replaced"? Complete and utter bollocks, written by a person whose ignorance about demography in general, and Irish demography in particular, is both wide and deep. Back in reality, the Irish population, which shrank relentlessly between 1845and 1961, has been increasing steadily since the 1961 census. The main driver in that steadily increasing population is the FACT that the Irish Total Fertility Rate(TFR) is among the highest in the developed world.
@antoniobautista67183 жыл бұрын
This vid seems very interesting, haven't seen much coverage of the Republic of Ireland's actions during the times of The Troubles.
@OldSkoolWax3 жыл бұрын
theres a reason for that. they sat down there and did next to nothing to help us up here.
@ecurewitz3 жыл бұрын
I was curious about how Ireland responded to The Troubles
@CK-il8wy3 жыл бұрын
If you're into finding out about the Irish Defence Forces during the Troubles,I'd highly recommend the book 'Fighting against Subversion'.It's a great book on how the Irish army and how it stopped the IRA smuggling arms and men over the border into or out of the North and its fight against humility and high command rivalries.
@itchapter2593 жыл бұрын
Funny since the occupation ....ie the invaders were actually the British ....and Irelands actions would simply be an attempt to repel ....
@ince55ant3 жыл бұрын
The Dubliners - Take it down from the mast 🎵 kzbin.info/www/bejne/f5q3o3p6rqyahdk
@TheHasar23 жыл бұрын
I don't know why I expected to actually explain the plan to invade northern Ireland instead of basically saying "it was a bad idea so they did nothing at the end"
@jamiehayn3 жыл бұрын
he did tho
@jimbodimbo9813 жыл бұрын
I remember a certain General Glatieiri of Argentina thought it’d be a good idea to attack a British possession. How well did that end up for him then?
@seanflynncontact3 жыл бұрын
Did the majority of the island of Ireland want independence? NI was artificially created to make a minority the majority of the then newly carved out state. How well has that been working out for NI and Britain? Soon they won't even be the majority of NI. Britain left the rest of Ireland because of Vietnam like warfare in all of Ireland along with pressure from the USA where many have Irish relatives. Ireland now remains in the EU giving political clout. Britain will never have peace there in the long term. NI is costing Britain an absolute fortune to maintain and NI is economically going backwards while the rest of Ireland is prospering. Have fun with NI. It's going to economically hold the UK back and be a constant source of trouble. If you think a minor battle for the almost empty Falkland Islands accounts for British might these days then your glory days are definitely far behind you. By the way. It's spelled possession.
@johnbrereton52293 жыл бұрын
@@seanflynncontact You say many in America have Irish relatives. Yes, but not as many as their are in the rest of Britain, and vice versa.
@luciano2003.3 жыл бұрын
🇦🇷🤜🏻🇬🇧
@alcabone11263 жыл бұрын
@@seanflynncontact the falklands is thoudands of kilometres from the uk and was invaded by a much larger country. Ireland in comparison is extremely close, with(definitely at the time) pro uk population. The war wouldn't have worked for the ROI. Even if NI joined the ROI it would still be majority non catholic, non celtic. There are also many anti roi groups stillm
@jimbodimbo9813 жыл бұрын
@@seanflynncontact totally agree Sean, we all know the history. NI should be part of the Republic.
@olivercuenca41092 жыл бұрын
The fact that the Irish military even speculated on the idea of a first strike against a NATO allied country at the height of the Cold War really shows there were clearly some officers at the time that didn’t have their heads fully screwed on.
@casteretpollux2 жыл бұрын
You had to be there to understand. Under the Irish Consitution it was Irish territory and hundreds if people were being burned out of their homes is pogroms against Catholics.
@anthonyhassett2 жыл бұрын
It was more of a political decision made by Lemas rather than a military officer.
@seanmccann8368 Жыл бұрын
I don't know your nationality, but if your fellow countrymen and women were being butchered by paramilitary forces of a foreign country would you expect your own military to defend them or would it be a case of Pontius Pilate.
@johncallaghan22053 жыл бұрын
According to Martin Dillon's book 'The Dirty War'; The British may well have been aware of the Irish plan because he suggests that just prior to deploying thousands of troops to the province they actually paused for 48 hours to allow time for the Irish intervention. If it had happened it is unlikely the British would have responded in force because of the bloodshed that would have occurred, instead being forced to hand the whole issue conveniently over to the UN.
@oscarosullivan45133 жыл бұрын
UN would have been more impartial
@markyinbelfastxx90882 жыл бұрын
Lol of course they would respond ,for a start the Irish army have never been capable of such a feat anyway Studies in the 70s showed that the Irish army would at most make it as far as portadown before being stopped by the ruc alone never mind the uda etc Besides the west woild never have let it go without action, remember that the UK is a nato member
@oscarosullivan45132 жыл бұрын
Years of underinvestment
@numerouno.54452 жыл бұрын
Martin Dillon wrote fiction. Entertaining nonetheless.
@michellebrown49032 жыл бұрын
@@oscarosullivan4513 the UN would have been more impartial ? You would have had Filipino, Lebanese and Korean troops on the streets . How would they have responded to becoming targets themselves? Because sooner or later both sides would have turned on them .
@joefromplanetmars22673 жыл бұрын
You should do a deep dive into the many figures and events around the peace process leading to the Good Friday agreement. Focusing on the politicians, priests and former militants who went about trying to end the troubles. Its something I don't think is talked about enough when talking about the troubles and the non-violent movements of the troubles I believe deserve a video of their own.
@jimmorrison54933 жыл бұрын
These brave people deserve credit and anonymity
@zzDevotion3 жыл бұрын
yeah maybe do a deep dive on how machine gun marty was an MI5 agent.
@liamcosgrave29373 жыл бұрын
Fr.John Reid,Garret Fitzgerald,Charles Haughey,John Hume,David Trimble,Albert Reynolds,John Major,Tony Blair,Bertie Ahern,Dick Spring and others are to thank for the Good Friday Agreement
@jimmorrison54933 жыл бұрын
@@liamcosgrave2937 Mo Mowlam
@ulsterman20213 жыл бұрын
The CIA instigated the Peace Process. When the Canary Wharf bombing sent financial shockwaves as far as Wall Street, the CIA basically 'removed' everyone opposed to the idea of a truce. Terror leaders in prison. The Mull of Kintyre Chinook helicopter crash killing senior anti terror experts in the British security services. Followed up by Blair and Hain's secret deal with the IRA.
@tom790133 жыл бұрын
Dude, I love your commentary on Irish history. It's always very balanced and well stated.
@Haggis_673 жыл бұрын
Holy shit I thought you were me for a second
@tom790133 жыл бұрын
@@Haggis_67 lolz
@Daniel_8762 жыл бұрын
absolutely agree with you. I'm Irish and he did a great job delivering an obviously unbiased video about it.
@MaximilienRobespierre13 жыл бұрын
Really good video and kudos for your Irish pronunciation :)
@giansideros3 жыл бұрын
I looked up this video and others after seeing your recent videos on the subject 👍🏾
@asanulsterman10253 жыл бұрын
So Max thinks its great that ROI planned to invade Ulster.
@saoirsedeltufo74363 жыл бұрын
@@asanulsterman1025 The 6 occupied counties aren't Ulster... and no, the RoI was never planning to 'invade' the 6
@asanulsterman10253 жыл бұрын
@@saoirsedeltufo7436 Your waffle and bullshit opinions are duly noted. Tufo says no.
@thejoin46873 жыл бұрын
It was all a cunning ruse to distract people from the real masterplan: an amphibious assault on the Isle of Wight in order to occupy the Minghella's ice cream factory.
@peadarruane65823 жыл бұрын
If I recall correctly. One aspect that you left out, was that part of the plan was that there would be a staged attack upon an ambulance from one of those border field hospitals. This would have incited the Irish army to seize Derry and Newry and other nationalist majority areas near the border, provoked by anger at the attack. My understanding was that the Republic knew they couldn't win militarily, but to use this flare up in the conflict to get the likes of the UN involved as soon as possible, and to reopen the issue of partition and the border. The plan reminds me of that scene in Dazed and Confused, where the one nerdy guy starts a fight, because he anticipates that people will intervene and break up the fight before he got hurt.
@EdMcF13 жыл бұрын
Sounds like a plan for an attack on a German radio station from Poland in August 1939...
@oscarosullivan45133 жыл бұрын
Frankly the UN security council is useless
@oscarosullivan45133 жыл бұрын
Imagine them turning up into the nationlist communities with crates of guns and ammo
@peadarruane65823 жыл бұрын
@@oscarosullivan4513 Think it was more that they'd force both sides to the table for a diplomatic solution, and thus reopen the border question.....(I'm not saying it was a good plan, just saying that it was a factor in the plan lol)
@frank27a3 жыл бұрын
The UN aside from Korea has been a mostly non event on interventions, NATO has done most of the heavy lifting. Could you imagine a single voice in New York listened to in a matter of conflict by London after its effectively been invaded by a foreign force.
@aporlarepublica3 жыл бұрын
Yes, we love your videos about Ireland. And yes, we would like to see some more.
Crazy that I just learned about this and then you post about it.
@cigh74453 жыл бұрын
My friend was in the reserves at the time and he was bricking it because they'd have probably had to use all their reserves. He and his friends only joined because they thought it'd be a step up from the Scouts hah. The Irish Army did not want to go to war, they did not have any illusions of grandeur, it was more about the principle of not standing by and watching a defenceless neighbour being attacked. In the end, it was the Old IRA rifles that got taken out of the attics for this purpose, the Provos took over and saw an opportunity to go further than simply patrolling their own neighbourhoods, and the rest is history. I am glad that the Irish Army did not go for this plan because it could have led to even worse violence and more tough times for the whole country.
@smallfeet45813 жыл бұрын
lol, a step up from the scouts ,
@alastairbrewster42743 жыл бұрын
Not much of a step up to be fair.
@michaelwale99333 жыл бұрын
My dad was a soldier in northern on tour in the early 90s. He told me British and Irish soldiers would meet at the border and trade British rations for Irish homemade sandwiches
@feidhlimidhmacanaltha36443 жыл бұрын
Those sandwiches were made with love and saliva!
@michaelwale99333 жыл бұрын
@@feidhlimidhmacanaltha3644 🤣 probably
@frasermckevitt2417 Жыл бұрын
It’s so funny cause everyone from other countries assume were mortal enemies but actually we just have a bad history together and many rivalries in sport
@The1860th3 жыл бұрын
This is crazy interesting! I love this unknown history.
@garethhanna91733 жыл бұрын
Had the Irish army invaded they would been met with the full fire and fury of the British army, at that time a truly formidable force. It would have been the equivalent of a mouse taking on Godzilla.
@SuperFunkmachine3 жыл бұрын
The Union Jack would of been flying above Dublin inside 48 hours.
@emcc85983 жыл бұрын
Yeah just like the British Army in Ireland after 1916 🤣
@DavidOatney3 жыл бұрын
@@SuperFunkmachine I am not as certain of that...
@enternext22103 жыл бұрын
@@SuperFunkmachine ye , you are 100 % right ✅ ! But then the real war would start .
@slimytoad14473 жыл бұрын
I think you dont understand the irish
@detectivehobsonv2.0813 жыл бұрын
Bro the Irish army would get destroyed
@veronicadredd223 жыл бұрын
The Boys of Kilmichael say different
@thevoiceless85673 жыл бұрын
And that’s why it didn’t happen.
@ScotsmanGamer3 жыл бұрын
get destroyed ya clown they forced the Brits to the north learn your history!
@JJaqn053 жыл бұрын
@@ScotsmanGamer you mad? haha. I thought you Irish didn't care about your military. Y you so butthurt about the fact that your country would have been destroyed if you had invaded the UK?
@russell54143 жыл бұрын
@@ScotsmanGamer Yeah LOL, the Brits decided they had better things to do. They would still be running Ireland if they wanted.
@jameswells5543 жыл бұрын
I served in the Marine Corps with a lad from Dublin who had served in the Irish Rangers, and he would talk about patrolling the border to try and intercept RA cats from hopping over. He mentioned this plan a couple times as an example of "just a stupid feckin' plan". I have to agree.
@dl54983 жыл бұрын
🧢
@yourtrappedinmygenjutsu3 жыл бұрын
Obviously lying
@jameswells5543 жыл бұрын
@@yourtrappedinmygenjutsu He actually emigrated back to Ireland, if you got the sack to confront a former Reconnaissance Marine, and Ranger.
@cianmartin83962 жыл бұрын
Wait a minute, the RA trained cats to conduct espionage in the north? The boys were right🐱👀👀
@cahilla54 Жыл бұрын
@@yourtrappedinmygenjutsu he ain’t lying. Ever hear of the name Kevin Owens?
@cgillespie80103 жыл бұрын
A very good video would be on the serious consideration to creating a Genevan Colony in Ireland. In case you think you've read that wrong -> A group of people from Geneva (yes, that Geneva) wanted to set up a colony in the south of Ireland. The only book on it is called Terrorists, Anarchists, and Republicans: The Genevans and the Irish in Time of Revolution by Whatmore, Richard
@aidybing6903 жыл бұрын
So republican= terrorist in your mind then
@smallfeet45813 жыл бұрын
@@aidybing690 now , he /she didnt say that , its the title of a book , and not written by c gillespie themselves
@cgillespie80102 жыл бұрын
@@aidybing690 I didn’t notice this at the time. Kinda wished I had of done, you need to read things better, that kinda reactionary nonsense is what makes the internet a horrible place for discussion.
@irishfionn40253 жыл бұрын
A nice touch to use the irish language translations 👌
@mathiaslist67053 жыл бұрын
10:32 ... and in the 21st century this "ongoing" conflict is still an issue .... and one may argue if negotiating it or fighting it out is actually more damaging or exhausting
@icemanire54673 жыл бұрын
I don't think it was a genuine plan. The RUC and government were brutal towards Irish Catholics. Lynch has neither the Firepower or manpower to contend with the British Army but what he can do is make world wide headlines highlighting the situation. During the war of independence 1919, the press caused world wide condemnation of Britain especially in the USA which was instrumental in making negotiations happen.
@eroche9133 жыл бұрын
Ireland weren't and indeed have never been in NATO. And so they could not have been ejected. One would also argue, that the United States would never have permitted NATO action against Ireland, with the high level representation of sympathetic Irish Americans in the Nixon administration.
@Mars-ev7qg2 жыл бұрын
Small but important correction here. There's no was about the British empire. It's still the British empire today. Just look at all the islands they still occupy in addition to the illegal imperial occupation of the northern counties of Ireland. Unfortunately the British empire still exists at this exact second. One island one Ireland 🇮🇪
@louisemckn3 жыл бұрын
Lynch’s lot were terrified of the popularity of SF and set about to undermine the socialist wing of the party in an effort to solidify their own power in the south. As a result there was a struggle and then total split with the official IRA becoming today’s workers party and the provisional IRA a much more right wing faction took over SF. It weakened the cause and was a major reason why the IRA during the troubles often targeted Protestant civilians as the officials maintained the fight was with England not with people who happened to be of a different religion, if you look into history you can see there were Catholics and Protestants on both sides it was really the troubles that solidified the religious aspect of the conflict. Yes it wasn’t an invention of the troubles but look back there were Protestants fighting for Irish freedom just like some Catholics fought for the crown. Sectarianism really found it’s footing with the troubles, ( a concept which personally I find pathetic but sure).
@mikhailv67tv2 жыл бұрын
This is great content. More on the Irish Governments stance on the Troubles would be great.
@ernestpimlott3 жыл бұрын
I grew up at this time- and remember this being discussed- The plan was to take over Derry and Armagh (Catholic areas) and then seek UN troops-The Irish governement knew they had no chances militarily- but felt that something had to be done to help the Catholic population
@kevinjackson2923 жыл бұрын
The Irish in America and Britain would have forced the British Government to find a Political solution.
@PanglossDr3 жыл бұрын
I was well aware of these plans at the time.
@andrewdavy99213 жыл бұрын
Ernest do you think it was a betrayel by the ROI government of the Irish in the north?
@JamesHussey4043 жыл бұрын
@@andrewdavy9921 To me no reason being the situation would be FUBAR
@markyinbelfastxx90882 жыл бұрын
The un wouldn't have interfered, the UK is nato
@bremnersghost9483 жыл бұрын
Much of the Irish Army in 1969 was on UN Blue Helmet Duty and wasn't even in Ireland, Thank God it never happened.
@ado753 жыл бұрын
That's not the case. There was a small contingent in Cyprus & possibly a few staff personnel attached to other missions.
@nathansellars37573 жыл бұрын
Ireland has an army?
@oscarosullivan45133 жыл бұрын
They would have had Congo veterans
@geroutathat2 жыл бұрын
@@oscarosullivan4513 In 1969, there would have been ww2 veterans about 90,000. ww1 veterans, and various former british army group veterans in Ireland like the connaught rangers who were one of the most feared parts of the British army. Although the actual size of the Irish army might have been small, the force that could have been called upon, would have probably been 150,000. Ireland forgets that up until the day Ireland got its freedom it was a huge part of the British army and we had some amazingly brave soldiers available. We had a unit that was the basis of "Storm troppers", we had units known to take on modern armies with knives and win. We had soliders that helped set up the special forces of America and the UK. On top of all that, we had IRA members, who would have helped a lot. The only thing the Irish govt would have to do would be convince another country like France to send enough weapons. Ireland didn't really want to invade, they just wanted the UK to take it seriously. They knew the UK was aware that Ireland at that point had never been as dangerous before. UK didnt have the stomach to hold Dublin, would they have had the stomach to go up against so many former british soldiers that they knew would fight them when every bullet was gone, with knives and fists, that they had seen and used these men to destroy french/spanish/german/russia/turk/Indian positions, now to be used against them? The UK wouldnt have taken the chance. As they knew if the Irish did actually get their act together, Scotland could flip a coin and join them if they thought they could take England together. Lets put it this way, England wouldn't have held off the troops in Ireland and Scotland if they got proper serious. The British army had used them as relentless dogs of war for too long. They were visious, and the English army lacked it without them.
@oscarosullivan45132 жыл бұрын
@@geroutathat Thanks for that nugget of wisdom
@webcelt3 жыл бұрын
As obvious as it is that an intervention would have been crazy, and as obvious as it was to everyone at the time, the British couldn't be sure Ireland wouldn't intervene. That ambiguity likely gave the Irish government some leverage it wouldn't have had if it had been clear it wouldn't cross the border.
@ahlads3 жыл бұрын
Exactly. If there's one thing the British government couldn't guess is how Ireland would act. After all that's what happens when you keep your boot on someone neck for 800 years
@alansmithee88313 жыл бұрын
Hello Hilbert. I was just a toddler in 1969, but I do remember BBC Nationwide or Panorama reporting along the same lines as this in the 1970s, hinting the change in the IRA, you have previously discussed, was inspired from the south, from support like you mentioned in this video. I keep seeing 1970s films on KZbin and I hope someone in comments will know better where to find video from back then.
@havinganap3 жыл бұрын
This one? kzbin.info/www/bejne/rZS2Y394rZihkJY
@alansmithee88313 жыл бұрын
@@havinganap Thank you - very interesting. The one I saw was, I believe, trying to show that officials in Eire had given support like Hilbert spoke of, but I was just a kid.
@silversolver78093 жыл бұрын
Look up "The Arms Trial" of 1970, where a couple of rogue ministers were accused of smuggling arms to the IRA. They were acquitted, but fired.
@alansmithee88313 жыл бұрын
@@silversolver7809 Thank you. I did find a documentary about this earlier this evening, showing how an Irish Labour MP had tried to find out at the time and the trial that took place, that was shown on KZbin as "Ireland's Shame". I will have a look for your suggestion too.
@silversolver78093 жыл бұрын
@@alansmithee8831 "I will have a look for your suggestion too" You'll find loads of news articles, don't know about videos unless you can access the RTE archive. It was a huge scandal in Ireland at the time, with gangster Haughey one of the men accused.
@cobbler91133 жыл бұрын
I think this can go on the long list of plans that would never have worked in a million years. This would have been practically little different to Russia’s invasion of Crimea with Irelands international reputation in the toilet.
@damianbylightning68233 жыл бұрын
As well as its ports, roads and rail systems. Lynch was a weak leader who thought he had to placate Romantic nationalist crackpots in his govt - and beyond. His words and actions made matters worse. He should've just sacked them and told them to go and whistle.
@cobbler91133 жыл бұрын
@@damianbylightning6823 Well he was far from the worst and if the Trouble's hadn't kicked off, he might have come to an arrangement with the North. However, his recommendations that Britain allow UN peacekeepers was naive at best. There was no way the UK with a military built to fight WWIII was going to allow that. Even if they did, there's no guarantee they would have handled events any better.
@damianbylightning68233 жыл бұрын
@@cobbler9113 Yes. He wasn't as bad as some. On both sides factionalism and weakness or indulgence toward it, was often a problem. Idiots like the Long Fellow heaped up problems for moral cretins and cowards like the appalling Ted Heath. On their own these people, ordinarily, wouldn't have been too bad. In a jungle where extremists determined the agenda, they were out of their depth. One of them didn't live long enough to see what his actions caused - the other, either didn't know or didn't care.
@SuperFunkmachine3 жыл бұрын
For a start Russia managed to invade Crimea with an army... Ireland hasn't got one.
@damianbylightning68233 жыл бұрын
@@SuperFunkmachine It does have one, after a fashion - and I'm pretty sure you're being sarcastic. It was in service to the oh-so moral and lofty aims of the corrupt and awful UN - a kind of inverted empire and empire building that was popular among naïve statesmen at that time. Not sure that token force would be any good without air and sea support though.
@mikeygormley3 жыл бұрын
Without provocation? I notice you omitted "Bloody Sunday" from your diatribe! Because that was one hell of a provocation!
@WrathOfGrapesN73 жыл бұрын
Unless the ROI deployed crystal balls, Bloody Sunday wasn't a provocation for this, as that was on the 30th January 1972, whereas Exercise Armageddon took place in 1970.
@britard84993 жыл бұрын
so would Kingsmill, the Birmingham Pub bombings, Omagh etc be enough provocation for the British Army to invade the ROI?
@user-qi5jw2hg1c3 жыл бұрын
@@britard8499 lol except all those atrocities come down to one common denominator: British interference in the island of Ireland
@SupremeLeaderKimJong-un3 жыл бұрын
The Irish should teach Eminem a thing or two on how to make a proper diss track
@caseyaylward88532 жыл бұрын
Yes I absolutely found this interesting. I really enjoy learning about Irish history. I really like how the Irish are not scared of a fight ever
@georgegeorgsonsonofgeorgea29402 жыл бұрын
We may be several centuries disconnected from them, but some celtic things never really left us.
@mossy199 Жыл бұрын
i'll fight ye for a fiver...
@ProfileP246 Жыл бұрын
That’s bullshit the IRA were cowards.
@silverkitty2503 Жыл бұрын
of course we are scared we aren't stupid. You cannot take these things flippantly. These are men's lives ..civilian lives.
@silverkitty2503 Жыл бұрын
@@davedoesplumbing bit work shy too ...too busy having political arguments online for both left and the right tbh they both need some fresh air
@Nobodythatmatter3 жыл бұрын
Ive meet a few officers and non commissioned who where part of the FCA at the time what is now known as the reserve defence force. They had been called in and stationed in community halls just short of the Border. Over my side the plans where to attack the customs and police barracks in newry. Of course they were stood down but many where offered the chance to transfer from volunteers to the main defence force but they wouldn't be allowed to carry over rank so many turned it down.
@michaelmulligan0 Жыл бұрын
Many did take it up and served for a long time known as “Full Time FCA”
@themelonman73633 жыл бұрын
You should do a video on the ancient history of Ireland. From its breakaway from Europe, to the first signs of life on it, to the Roman era. Etc.
@Tereyoc3 жыл бұрын
The British regiment the green jackets or green cloaks was welcomed by all sides in Derry. But for some reason someone decided to get rid of them. Instead the paratroop outfit that carried out the ballymurphy massacre, were sent to Derry. A few weeks later bloody Sunday. Why was the regiment that had some control removed.
@oscarosullivan45133 жыл бұрын
I wouldn’t know maybe they (the higher ups) felt the green jackets were too soft
@matthew18823 жыл бұрын
@@oscarosullivan4513 apparently that was close to the truth. The paras were sent in to 'crack a tough nut'. Didn't work out too well.
@oscarosullivan45133 жыл бұрын
@@matthew1882 They made things worse
@matthew18823 жыл бұрын
@@oscarosullivan4513 absolutely. I mean they are paratroops. You drop them out of a plane to capture bridges and shit not police a civilian population.
@reintaler63553 жыл бұрын
Speaking about Catholics, could you do "What did the Holy See/Vatican do in WW2"?
@nikoclesceri22673 жыл бұрын
help a Nazi scientist become a cyborg obviously
@julianshepherd20383 жыл бұрын
So that's why Catholics were denied the vote. The pope from the last did it not Bloody Sunday
@icemanire54673 жыл бұрын
Look up Hugh O'Flaherty (The scarlet and the black). He hid 7k Jews, US and British servicemen in the Vatican and around Rome.
@reintaler63553 жыл бұрын
@@icemanire5467 Thanks, though I didn't mean individual/local Catholics, but rather the Curia itself. Individuals differed widely; you can bring up O'Flaherty while I can mention Pavelić.
@Beanbag7773 жыл бұрын
@@reintaler6355 ya check out the book “church of spies “ …..
@dereksweeney32742 жыл бұрын
You missed the Irish civil War from 1922 onwards the vote to except the treaty of 22 only passed by 7 votes
@johnathonwebster57202 жыл бұрын
There was a time well before 1969 when the build up of local offical military Ulster forces of the North on the border caused a great deal of concern to the South of Ireland These were not a band of brothers but well kitted out and armed with disciplines Not British Army So it's always troubled the Southern Irish the Protestants getting militarized Its in the DNA of Protestantism this is why England keeps the boot on the Unionist neck for fear of them kicking off?!
@donathandorko3 жыл бұрын
Great video. Looking forward to the video on Portugal's plans to invade Spain in 1993 and the Luxembourg plan to rout Germany in 1997.
@EdMcF13 жыл бұрын
In the 1970s, a Portuguese retired Army officer ran for office on a platform of taking back Olivença/Olivenza from Spain, he got around 3% of the vote iirc.
@oscarosullivan45133 жыл бұрын
Nutcases
@LultasticFilms3 жыл бұрын
I’ve not seen anything ever about either of these cases, link?
@JohnMacbeth2 жыл бұрын
@@LultasticFilms It's a joke, he's referring to smaller neighbouring countries attempting to invade bigger ones.
@CmonTheHoopsCeltic2 жыл бұрын
Fantastic channel keep up the good work ☺️👍
@Richard1A2B22 күн бұрын
Correction: there is no country called the Republic of Ireland, the name of our country is Ireland. Under Article 4 of Ireland's constitution the state is named Ireland. That's why the blue rectangle on an Irish car's registration plate says IRL not ROI. Nowhere in an Irish passport will you find the words "Republic of Ireland". Our name registered with the United Nations is Ireland. If you are going to make educational videos like these, getting the name of one of the countries is fundamental.
@kierandoodykd3 жыл бұрын
My grandad was in the Irish Army in the 60s so if this invasion would have happened, I might never have been born. Oh he was also at Jadotville too, if you don't know what that is then I'd say definitely go look it up. Iys wild
@frankfinnsweenryan3 жыл бұрын
The Siege of Jadotville was an amazing film. What is your opinion on it?
@kierandoodykd3 жыл бұрын
@@frankfinnsweenryan I absolutly love it. I remebered watching it with my dad and it made him cry with pride for my grandad
@johnsheridan21722 жыл бұрын
What battalion did your grandad serve with in the Congo as my dad served there himself .
@markyinbelfastxx90882 жыл бұрын
Nice one ,did u have any family who fought in the war ?
@humphreygokart21353 жыл бұрын
9:39 "... and so Ireland would be diplomatically excommunicated from NATO". What?!!!
@emcc85983 жыл бұрын
For all viewers ... The take on this video is at best somewhat misleading. There was no "plan" for a conventional war or invasion during the troubles in NI. The ROI government undertook an evaluation on the value of a guerilla type incursion across the border in order to involve the UN in the the rapidly escalating humanitarian crisis that was N. Ireland at that point in history. It didn't happen eitherway. But in retrospect and Imho it would most definitely have been best for both sides in NI had the UN intervened and stopped 30 years of bloody violence which the British intervention once again failed to descalate.
@mrgeorgeb00623 жыл бұрын
War game
@tsar3893 жыл бұрын
He literally said it's not a actual operation it was a war game
@emcc85983 жыл бұрын
@@tsar389 Yet goes on to detail the consequences as if it was planned as a defacto war ('attacking a friendly neighbour without provocation') as opposed to a humanitarian operation trying to trigger UN involvement. Many replies here seem to have gone with the former. That and Ireland couldn't have been excluded from Nato - simply because it wasn't a member of NATO in the first place.
@tomredmond56356 ай бұрын
“Without provocation” definitely disagree. Irish citizens were being burnt out of their houses in places like Derry and Belfast by loyalists and the RUC. And the British Army also allowed this to happen.
@paddyabroad6343 жыл бұрын
Well researched and impartial.
@dek1233 жыл бұрын
I was actually serving in NI at the time, that would have been interesting. But talking of the army bias, you always tend to be biased against the people who are set on killing you.
@termniko3 жыл бұрын
i dont think those 100s of innocent catholic families were set on killing you
@NegativeAccelerate3 жыл бұрын
@@termniko not initially, but everyone just wanted to kill eachother at one point. And even if they didn’t want to kill you it was safer for yourself to assume they wanted to kill you.
@Derekconlon3 жыл бұрын
They weren’t at first. Then your army started killing them. You tend to want to fight back against people who kill you and yours.
@mlamazigh53983 жыл бұрын
@@NegativeAccelerate yes but dont forgot who started that all bullshit, english protestant
@dek1233 жыл бұрын
Touchy, touchy. I was there on the ground, and you lot probably weren’t born. I think I know what went on better than most people, and I never killed anyone.
@Niall0013 жыл бұрын
"The British army in-between" line is a joke. They weren't in between. 5-15% of sine regiments were also loyalist paramilitaries. British intelligence cooperated with loyalist paramilitaries regularly in some regions & helped armed them. Even though loyalist paramilitaries were responsible for the largest numbers of attacks on civilians, the BA focused almost exclusively on Republicans. Catholic civilians were 14x more likely to be killed by the BA than Protestant civilians. When it came to internment, the British interned far more Catholics than Protestants. The British did not function as some sort of neutral party trying to keep the peace between warring tribes. They viewed it just as they viewed the Malayan Emergency or Mau Mau Uprising. They were there to ensure British rule, to support pro-state forces (including paramilitaries) and to crush the communities that opposed the state by any means necessary.
@anguswaterhouse92553 жыл бұрын
It wasn't a majority uprising like mau mau or malaysia it was a foriegn supported insergency that aimed to break away northern ireland from the uk despite the fact that there has never been a poll showing support for more than 40% wanting unification The support of illegal paramilitaries was almost exclusivly done by Thatcher and it is remembered among the worst things she did which is saying something
@Niall0013 жыл бұрын
@@anguswaterhouse9255 What opinion poll on the Mau Mau Uprising did you read Angus? And you'll be aware that some of the rebels in the Kenyan & Malayan uprisings were pro-Soviets.
@anguswaterhouse92553 жыл бұрын
@@Niall001pro soviet doesn't mean supported by directly and sheltered in the country and to be honest i don't know much about the other things but colonies are a different matter to one of the main nations in the UK that has never polled that it would like to leave
@TommyBahama843 жыл бұрын
Whinging Irish…
@Lessons4Life3 жыл бұрын
How can you invade your own country?
@TommyBahama843 жыл бұрын
It’s not and wasn’t. During Irish secession, Northern Ireland democratically voted to remain part of the UK.
@Lessons4Life3 жыл бұрын
@@TommyBahama84 nothing democratic about the Gerrymandered statelet. Ulster signed the Ulster covenant but even then Ulster was severed in two. If you partition a country anyone can be a majority. Ireland as a whole voted to leave the UK and then under the threat of Loyalist violence 6 of the 9 counties of Ulster were retained by the UK. These 6 remaining counties will democratically choose to join the rest of Ireland within the next 20 years.
@user-qi5jw2hg1c3 жыл бұрын
@@TommyBahama84 'democratically' haha. Pick up a book
@thatdude__3 жыл бұрын
How to start a war in the comments
@FastFl0w3 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on the seige of jadotville a irish UN mission
@edwardogorman92112 жыл бұрын
The movie is on either u tube o netflix called the siege of Jadotville.
@xrstufty86513 жыл бұрын
It would’ve been daring and a fight we couldn’t win but I’ll put it to you this way; Liam Mellows himself said “Tone knew he was fighting a losing battle, Pearse knew it too. But they fought. Because they believed in another generation. In the name of tone, in the name of pearse, in the name of Ireland. Fight on.”
@julianshepherd20383 жыл бұрын
Fighter jets v buses It's not a fight
@xrstufty86513 жыл бұрын
@@julianshepherd2038 the provos and irps held them back for a number of years. What damage would a bit of help have done
@IrishTechnicalThinker3 жыл бұрын
As a proud Irish man living in Belfast, this was brilliant coverage of what more less happened. Bloody Sunday caused the Irish to deploy at the boarders. Thanks brother.
@rickyyacine48183 жыл бұрын
I wish u restore northern Ireland the island is urs fight brother
@DTL0VER3 жыл бұрын
@@rickyyacine4818 best of luck
@rickyyacine48183 жыл бұрын
@@DTL0VER British started it since 1100 ad
@ApeX-pj4mq3 жыл бұрын
@@rickyyacine4818 Normans, not British at that time. British wouldnt be an appropriate term to use up until the early 1700's
@emcc85983 жыл бұрын
@@ApeX-pj4mq Sassanachs ...
@jacktilley9813 жыл бұрын
Honestly feel the troubles wouldve went smoother and more just in whos to blame if the british and irish army did a coalition peacekeeping force presence.
@garyb59983 жыл бұрын
You don't see any firearms on the Catholic Nationalist side... In fact the British Army were initially welcomed as saviours by the Catholic Nationalist population
@liamo54482 жыл бұрын
to be fair to the Catholics in n Irelands the ira did not defend Catholics the murder in cold blood over 300-400 another misconception is that the ira are nationalist there just flat out Marxist , the unionist killed (usually in cold blood as well) around 100- 200 while the British army murder around 150 as well the Catholics in Northern Ireland really had it bad as they had no one defending them other than the Irish Republic at the time
@oliversherman24148 ай бұрын
Very interesting videos
@reicscarlo783 жыл бұрын
Great pronunciation of Taoiseach! It’s not often people get it right
@jibjub21213 жыл бұрын
Tee-shock 😄 or should that be tea? 🍵
@warbler19843 жыл бұрын
My dentist was kidnapped by the IRA provos (correction the INLA)...they cut a finger off...strangely I never noticed the missing finger as a child
@theanglo-lithuanian17683 жыл бұрын
Damn that's a badass story to tell the kids. Hope your dentist is doing well.
@mumflrpumble91073 жыл бұрын
The days of worrying about finding an incendiary device down the back of a shop food shelf were quite something
@kewidi3 жыл бұрын
That was the INLA if your dentist was John O'Grady
@thevoiceless85673 жыл бұрын
@@mumflrpumble9107 My parents had to check under their car every morning when they left the house, even when they were living in West Germany. 😟 I’m English by the way, though an ancestor on my mum’s maternal side was actually Irish. They migrated here in the 19th century, which is quite common in Manchester, Birmingham and Liverpool. The very cities the IRA targeted the most during the troubles.
@caniceclooney10283 жыл бұрын
that was the INLA, not the IRA
@benwilson61453 жыл бұрын
Perhaps you need to look at why the Protestant in Northern Ireland were so angry? A subject missed. The Republic of Ireland had been running a campaign since 1921 to ethnically cleanse the Republic of any who were not Roman Catholics, this included Protestants and Jews. The Census figures are easily found online to show this.
@paulsmith44673 жыл бұрын
Ian Paisley said Ireland had consentration camps for southern protestants, perhaps you can advise to there location. Utter twaddle
@benwilson61453 жыл бұрын
@@paulsmith4467 Concentration camps may be rubbish but the Irish Census figures are not. Available online for the world to see.
@liamkelly13123 жыл бұрын
Total Tosh- who is this guy! The outbreak of the "Troubles" ( euphemism for civil war) in 1969 was an outcome of the savage police repression of the Civil Rights movement (which had no intention of Irish unification but rather just the removal of long standing institutional discrimination of the Catholic minority community). The dogs in the streets of every Irish city, town & village knew would have been suicidal move for Irish Army to invade the 6 counties in Ulster - Lynch's proposal was for a UN force , i.e. British & Irish troops in blue berets, to patrol the Catholic & Protestant ghetoes. In 1969 PIRA literally did not exist, the British Army effectively became their recruitment agency when internment without trial was introduced-and only targeted the minority community.
@FiannaUladh3 жыл бұрын
Can you do a video on the UVF
@AshArAis3 жыл бұрын
Love the idea of getting bus éireann in on the army transport. A rumbling on the horizon heading to Derry... * beep * Stand Clear! Luggage Doors Operating!
@markwhelanspain91353 жыл бұрын
They'd even be late for the invasion ffs..
@Fergus-ns7cj3 жыл бұрын
invasion is off the 46A never showed up
@peterastles61403 жыл бұрын
blakey off, on the buses could have maintained order
@johnblue89073 жыл бұрын
As an Englishman who has lived and worked in the republic and visited Derry I found this vid very interesting and in formative, cheers
@asc.4453 жыл бұрын
Interestingly enough, the US garrisoned an army during WW2 to potentionally invade the South.
@seanmccann83683 жыл бұрын
Yes, David Gray, the US Ambassador to Ireland was against Irish neutrality and did everything in his power to involve Ireland in WW2, including threatening invasion. He infamously had an education at the hands of Col. Michéal Tuohy of the Irish Defence Forces who had fought the brits during the War of Independance. Gray explained to Tuohy (a Brigade Commander in the Defence Forces) how well equipped the yanks were and how numerous they were and how the Irish couldn't possibly prevent a successful invasion. Tuohy asked what would happen if his men shot at the yanks and was told the Irish would be massacred. Tuohy asked the same question again - same answer, again - Mr US Ambassador got thick and asked what was the matter with Tuohy couldn't he understand English?. Tuohy asked if yank soldiers were bullet proof - No, of course not. Tuohy explained quietly that he had fought the brits twenty something years before and he and his soldiers were ready to fight and die for Ireland - how many dead yanks was Ireland worth to the Amnassador?
@Meaocb3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for so much Irish content Hilbert
@neilbarnes2791 Жыл бұрын
I'd love to hear from someone who was in the room during the war-gaming for this. It must have been an incredibly surreal experience.
@daveanderson38053 жыл бұрын
I wonder how the troubles would have played out if instead of the british army the UN had sent peace keepers It could have worked out better in the long run
@seanmccann83683 жыл бұрын
brits wouldn't allow that. It wasn't very good PR old boy to have blue helmets on the streets of 'british' cities and towns, don't you know?
@Jamesmofo-nc8hi Жыл бұрын
As an Irishman, I have a lot of respect for you referring to Derry as “Derry” and not “London Derry”
@frasermckevitt2417 Жыл бұрын
Most Protestants call it Derry now a days not for anything political just it’s quicker and a way to not start a fight
@dingemandevalk63393 жыл бұрын
Ljouwert Derry is supported ofc by the Frysian Republican Army
@spzer25573 жыл бұрын
Cringe role playing 11 year old
@conormacnessa772311 ай бұрын
Great post
@thehistorybox11633 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video
@pope35293 жыл бұрын
I can smell the English Breakfast when I watch this video. Jokes aside great job with this video, you were about as unbiased as anyone with a connection to one of these countries can be when it comes to discussing this topic.
@gerardhayden65683 жыл бұрын
I read some where that it was to be set piece battle, a few shots fired with British forces retreating to pre agreed positions. It was an impractical face saving plan to shed some troublesome border regions.
@dredd19812 жыл бұрын
Highly unlikely. The irish knew that the RAF would bomb them off the face of the planet so they didn't dare cross the border.
@gerardhayden65682 жыл бұрын
@@dredd1981 I think you misunderstand. In a real engagement, we would have faced not only the RAF but all of NATO! That would as you say have led to obliteration in short order - unless the Soviets got involved. No, this was supposed to have been explored by both governments as an obscure way of reassigning some republican districts along the border to the south, effectively increasing the unionist majority in what remained of the north.
@dredd19812 жыл бұрын
@@gerardhayden6568 Personally I'd have been in favor of that. Today, if you kidnapped someone from any country in the world, blindfolded them then dropped them off in the middle of Belfast and asked them what country they were in, they would scratch their head and shrug their shoulders. NI has effectively been stripped of virtually everything that identifies it as being British. Heck, the union flag can only fly for a handful of days a year, the rest of the time the flagpoles stand empty. "parity of esteem" is the old excuse that is wheeled out, yet everyone knows that in the unlikely event of a united ireland, the idea of "parity of esteem" would go out the window and if any unionists complained about the tricolours that would be everywhere, they'd be told where to go. Personally, I might have had some sympathy for a united ireland had sinn fein/ira not murdered two members of my family. And a lot of unionists feel the same. Had they not bombed and murdered their way around the 6 counties, there might actually be a UI by now. But as it stands only 30% support a UI. So it ain't happening.
@slappy89413 жыл бұрын
The Irish wanted to go to war against the Irish, but they couldn't agree on it and just started fighting each other instead.
@bodyer21203 жыл бұрын
Catholics and Protestants??? What religious principles were they fighting over? The 2 sides were Republicans/Nationalists and Loyalists/Unionists. It wasn't a religious war, it was a political one.
@L_U-K_E3 жыл бұрын
excellent video
@NZAnimeManga3 жыл бұрын
Wrong Union Flag in the thumbnail.
@casteretpollux3 жыл бұрын
Has there been any time in the last 900 years in which the English did not have a plan to invade Ireland either on the shelf or in action?
@maxdavis77223 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure that’s the global standard mate. Allies plan invasion from each other. Of course your comment is an exaggeration but I’m sure even Ireland today has some plan for an invasion from the UK and vice versa.
@Snp20243 жыл бұрын
You are good youtuber Hilbert don't start you're car tomorrow.
@noobatthetower87473 жыл бұрын
Uh oh
@mcollinss1163 жыл бұрын
The main reason why the ROC didn’t go to with the UK was (conventional or non-conventional) was because it would’ve removed their credibility of trying to be peace makers and de-escalating the conflict.
@trevormillar1576 Жыл бұрын
Ireland has no airforce; any Irish invasion of Ulster would gave been met with airstrikes on Dublin. Cork, Limerick. They would have become the "North Vietnam" of western Europe; there were lots of politicians who supported such action and lots of RAF pilots eager for a spot of target practice
@Slobbynobby3 жыл бұрын
Nobody will ever really know how bloody the troubles were. Or how long they really lasted. Ireland was troubled for 800 years. All from sectarianism, slavery, slaughter and mayhem. This country has seen the worst
@solidus7843 жыл бұрын
I think the same RTÉ documentary popped up in both our feeds lately hilbert. Interesting subject matter.
@gimzod763 жыл бұрын
How odd that they'd even consider this I thought Catholics considered suicide to be a sin.
@eoghancasserly36263 жыл бұрын
Martyrdom is promoted in Catholicism. They see it as emulating Christ himself
@vorynrosethorn9033 жыл бұрын
Is it martyrdom if the only reason the Roman soldier killed you is because you shanked him, or does it rather count as a case of suicide by cop.
@Maidaseu3 жыл бұрын
Some people like their freedom.
@mumflrpumble91073 жыл бұрын
@@Maidaseu Freedom from a foreign invasion and an unwanted Republican governance, or Freedom from a majority supported union
@user-qi5jw2hg1c3 жыл бұрын
@@mumflrpumble9107 Carve a statelet any way you want, and you'll easily make the minority into the majority. This is exactly what happened with NI's creation, and the subsequent gerrymandering within.
@stephenwright88242 жыл бұрын
Who's got their compass directions mixed up? By 7:20, Hilbert says all this is happening in the _North-West_ of Ireland. It's obvious to all watching that the action happened in the _North-East._ Unless Hilbert is aware of some shenanigans in Cavan and Donegal the rest of the world doesn't know about, the proper thing to do would be, at the very least, to acknowledge the mistake in the narration.